Electronics Introduction to LC Oscillators circa 1974 US Air Force Training Film

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • For use in our study of Parametric Excitations of Electric Oscillations, Join us at: www.aboveunity.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 80

  • @matyi1656
    @matyi1656 Рік тому +94

    This is the kind of education that should have stayed. They made a paralell between something you know and the new knowledge creating these examples. So much easier to absorb the basics this way, and after this you can go to the advanced part and understand that more easily thanks to this. Nowadays they teach you like you already know the basics well and that is where today's education fails.

    • @ovalwingnut
      @ovalwingnut 7 місяців тому +1

      Yes, Maty. You are wise and speak the truth. What has happened to us... it's like most things that actually worked have been forgotten. But not today! I watched it and R a better person 4 it. Cheers

    • @Alessioalessio-qv1ff
      @Alessioalessio-qv1ff Місяць тому

      We still use it in europe

  • @Kurt1968
    @Kurt1968 7 місяців тому +15

    Man, these old videos are so much better than the modern stuff you see in UA-cam. The right cadence, clear English, proper use of visual aids (even using more primitive ones like this are more clear).

    • @ovalwingnut
      @ovalwingnut 7 місяців тому

      Y. Who knew are GR8T GR8T GR8T grandfathers were so smart?

  • @MrElapid
    @MrElapid 11 днів тому +1

    I love the clear, concise and unadorned style of explanation here. Well done!

  • @omsingharjit
    @omsingharjit 3 роки тому +48

    That old way of explanation is rare now days

    • @alakani
      @alakani 3 роки тому +9

      Not rare at all, just really expensive now

    • @rodericksibelius8472
      @rodericksibelius8472 2 роки тому +10

      Professors scares the students with COMPLEX MATHEMATICAL Physics and STUDENTS quit Engineering. DEMOTIVATIONAL system of education. LOL.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 2 роки тому +6

      Yep, I like this old stuff too.

    • @thephilosopher7173
      @thephilosopher7173 2 роки тому +3

      @@alakani Well it is rare because its expensive lol

  • @edtruthseeker3337
    @edtruthseeker3337 3 місяці тому +2

    I was a USAF Electronics Student. They did have some really good films for training.

  • @manuelvillarreal1021
    @manuelvillarreal1021 Рік тому +5

    just watched "the beauty of LC oscillations" and while the animations were great, I was losing my mind because the direction of the induced emf didn't change at the correct time when the current began to decrease... THANK YOU SOO MUCH !!!

  • @adhyansehgal4192
    @adhyansehgal4192 Місяць тому +1

    as usual the us army with the logistic approach i thought i was gonna go insane thank you so much

  • @jboy6944
    @jboy6944 Рік тому +6

    Sir, you are truly a BOSS! You've somehow explained what I've found difficult for months 💕💕❤❤

  • @simonlinser8286
    @simonlinser8286 10 місяців тому +2

    If you want to get the navy (i think its navy) manual on electronics it's pretty cool and actually still relevant for learning stuff, it's readily available for download

  • @0dbm
    @0dbm 2 місяці тому +1

    Excellent video

  • @mazharkhaliq1971
    @mazharkhaliq1971 4 місяці тому +1

    Thanks for the knowledge 😊

  • @PaulCrooks-qj6di
    @PaulCrooks-qj6di 3 місяці тому +1

    Boy I went to college and didn't understand it like this.

  • @nusyil
    @nusyil 3 роки тому +9

    Great explanations! Thanks!

  • @surendersingal2192
    @surendersingal2192 Рік тому

    Fantastico education on LC circuits n cost added by self resonance damping. Elegant comparison WITH flywheel n paper graphs.
    Jussojuan surender singal

  • @jacobvandijk6525
    @jacobvandijk6525 2 роки тому +6

    Start here: 4:53. Of course, 0.159 = 1 / (2.pi)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit

  • @sachinhrajak1709
    @sachinhrajak1709 2 роки тому +3

    Amazing explaination 👍

  • @deanboful
    @deanboful 22 дні тому

    An LC circuit is A.C. A.C. is an LC circuit is an oscillator not a wave.

  • @rockyreynolds739
    @rockyreynolds739 4 роки тому +14

    What could the motivation be for the one jagoff voting this video down?

    • @RapperBC
      @RapperBC 4 роки тому +4

      He's a jagoff. Nothing can save him.

    • @AvantGrade
      @AvantGrade 3 роки тому +5

      maybe he/she wanted the classified version.

    • @ubrayj02
      @ubrayj02 3 роки тому +1

      Fell asleep at the helm and forehead hit the thumbs down button in the submarine.

    • @greeneblack7330
      @greeneblack7330 3 роки тому +3

      this is a russian guy

  • @Eligus33
    @Eligus33 Рік тому +1

    I watched a lot of these training films and film strips back in 98 before they made everything confusing

  • @user-og1ko7fe8q
    @user-og1ko7fe8q Рік тому +1

    Is the current flow direction correct when capacitor discharge? I think the current from the capacitor is clockwise when flip the switch to C.

  • @p0k7lm
    @p0k7lm Рік тому

    solid example !📕🎺📖📚📐✏🔬

  • @arifwahyudiansyah2809
    @arifwahyudiansyah2809 Рік тому +1

    so how to build regenerative feedback circuit?

  • @veronicanoordzee6440
    @veronicanoordzee6440 2 роки тому +4

    @ 6:50 The coil becomes a voltage-source because the decaying magnetic field acts like a battery! My battery produces voltage, not energy! And so this magnetic field contains no energy. Faraday's law of induction is about changing magnetic fields and ... voltage.

    • @Satyaprakash81102
      @Satyaprakash81102 Рік тому +3

      A battery contains potential energy and similarly an induction coil stores potential energy due to magnetic field generated as a result of applied voltage.

  • @carlosdeandro7046
    @carlosdeandro7046 2 роки тому +2

    Why the actual explanations isn´t so that didactic ?

  • @dualexistence
    @dualexistence 3 роки тому +7

    Shouldn't the LC capacitor be a non-polar capacitor?

    • @camron695
      @camron695 2 роки тому +2

      I believe it doesn't matter which kind of capacitor you use

    • @Satyaprakash81102
      @Satyaprakash81102 Рік тому +2

      It must be a non polar capacitor. The induced oscillating current is AC. So a polarized capacitor will die. The symbol surprised me.

  • @good.citizen
    @good.citizen Рік тому

    thank you
    i use a whawha pedal for my fdd..
    .

  • @mazharkhaliq1971
    @mazharkhaliq1971 4 місяці тому

    I have a question
    1) if the amplifier is used to strengthen the signal that is restoring the amplitude that is lost due to circuit resistance then why do we need a feedback circuit?
    Please explain?
    And if feedback is used to get the same signal frequency and phase, but isn't that the job of the LC circuit won't the LC circuit generate constant frequency signals ?

    • @nikiopia
      @nikiopia 3 місяці тому +1

      I believe I can shed some light on your question.
      To answer your first question, you're right, the amplifier is used to regenerate the energy losses in the LC (oscillator) circuit. The feedback circuit is required because without it, you would simply be amplifying the gradually decaying output from the LC circuit. The feedback circuit is what gives back the LC circuit the energy it loses due to its internal resistances.
      For your second question, the LC circuit's job is to provide the capability of generating constant frequency/amplitude signals, but without amplifier feedback to recoup loses, the output will decay away over time like the felt pen demo held in place by rubber bands.
      Hope this helps, cheers.

    • @mazharkhaliq1971
      @mazharkhaliq1971 3 місяці тому +1

      @@nikiopia Ooh okay thank you for the explanation😊

  • @itrstt66
    @itrstt66 Рік тому +2

    why did the quality equation get inverted at 16:08?

    • @Inflec
      @Inflec 11 місяців тому +1

      Because the first equation for Q was for the series resistance of the circuit. The second equation refers to any *parallel* resistance *across* the circuit, which must be kept at a high value to obtain a satisfactory Q for the L-C combination.

  • @user-rq9po2zv4k
    @user-rq9po2zv4k Рік тому

    Пояснення дуже дотепне

  • @abulfazibrahimov1990
    @abulfazibrahimov1990 Рік тому +2

    1000th like

  • @itrstt66
    @itrstt66 Рік тому +1

    Why doesnt it cancel out in the mic and speaker feedback example? the phase shifting doesnt happen?

    • @tobiasgertz7800
      @tobiasgertz7800 Рік тому

      The only waves that will reinforce for a standing wave are 180° out of phase. It's a closed loop system that selects for those conditions. Great question.

    • @itrstt66
      @itrstt66 Рік тому +1

      @@tobiasgertz7800 thank you for The answer, Im not sure i understand what you mean by "... Selects for those cpnditions...". What does it exaclty means?

    • @tobiasgertz7800
      @tobiasgertz7800 Рік тому

      ua-cam.com/video/oZ38Y0K8e-Y/v-deo.html
      Your englishv is good, but you won't need words to understand this one.

    • @tobiasgertz7800
      @tobiasgertz7800 Рік тому

      ua-cam.com/video/cnH2ltfW48U/v-deo.html

    • @tobiasgertz7800
      @tobiasgertz7800 Рік тому

      In the feedback loop the physical soundwaves have a speed through the air and they also have harmonics. There are more than just one fundamental frequency. The one specific frequency that fits inside the physical distance between microphone and amplifier is the one that has the least resistance to the loop and gets amplified. Positive reinforcement happens over and over again rapidly. There is necessarily phase shifting and harmonics in the system. The speaker isn't a perfect sine wave generator, and air isn't a lossless or homogenous medium. It all generated harmonics. One of those harmonics (different but related frequency) will appear as a phase shift.

  • @felixdiaz4438
    @felixdiaz4438 Рік тому

    👍

  • @PremSingh-ev4mo
    @PremSingh-ev4mo Рік тому +1

    Wrong current flows from + ve to -ve

    • @BTW...
      @BTW... Рік тому +1

      Wrong.. Deluded
      That is not the reality of electron flow, which is current flow.
      If you were taught that, they would have explained that is termed 'conventional flow' thinking and not in accordance to reality.... I call it 'deluded'.

    • @Amine-gz7gq
      @Amine-gz7gq 7 місяців тому

      @@BTW... The problem is to mix up the two conventions: in high school physics lessons, during charging of the capacitor, the direction of the current is from the battery's + terminal to its minus terminal, whereas during discharging, the direction of the current is from the negatively-charged armature to the positively-charged one.

  • @piotrne
    @piotrne 2 роки тому +2

    6:05 In those days, did the current flow from minus to plus?

    • @abhirajsingh960
      @abhirajsingh960 2 роки тому +10

      they are not using conventional current
      they are depicting actual electron flow

    • @jakobjensen3424
      @jakobjensen3424 Рік тому +1

      Current has always been minus to plus, it's voltage that's from plus to minus.

    • @piotrne
      @piotrne Рік тому +1

      @@jakobjensen3424 No... Current traditionally flows from positive to negative, although electrons flow from negative to positive.

    • @jakobjensen3424
      @jakobjensen3424 Рік тому

      @@piotrne Current traditionally flows from negative to positive. Because current is* electron flow.

    • @mikejones-vd3fg
      @mikejones-vd3fg Рік тому

      ​@@jakobjensen3424 But in a circle 2 points are both behind and infront of each other , there isnt a front or behind, both points are going toward each other, so technically this explantion doesnt make sense either way? and maybe why my brains starts to hurt when i see a diode in a schematic.

  • @intheshell35ify
    @intheshell35ify Рік тому

    Well I'm not scared of em anymore.

  • @tobiasgertz7800
    @tobiasgertz7800 Рік тому

    Amplifiers oscillate and oscillators amplify.

  • @jongdonglu
    @jongdonglu 2 роки тому +5

    "Unclassified" so this simple piece of information was classified?

    • @bsdiceman
      @bsdiceman 2 роки тому +5

      Unclassified just means public. It doesn't necessarily mean it was ever classified.

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 Рік тому +2

      Yes made, today this is simple but at that time hardly someone know about electronics, it can be used against u by ur enemy to obviously you don't want your enemy to be educated as u

    • @oakspines7171
      @oakspines7171 7 місяців тому

      It should have been classified and it was.

    • @nonconsensualopinion
      @nonconsensualopinion 28 днів тому

      ​@@supremeleader5516 No. Just no. This video was made in the 1970s. The whole world knew about LC circuits already. This video was made, and labeled "unclassified" because it was not "classified". Many people here are mistakenly thinking this film was "declassified". That's different.

  • @cyklop1977
    @cyklop1977 3 роки тому +1

    Zajebiste

  • @two_number_nines
    @two_number_nines 2 роки тому +1

    This video is a swiss cheese of theory needed to explain. While most things aren't completely explained a few details were wrong and the presentation completely failed to demonstrate what it has to demonstrate to the intended audience.

  • @TheRealEtaoinShrdlu
    @TheRealEtaoinShrdlu 22 дні тому

    "1974"?!?! Looks more like 1944! 😂😂😂