Single-photon detectors - Krister Shalm

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @mfglinux
    @mfglinux 2 роки тому +2

    Very nice talk and nice recording. One can watch it like if we were there. Congrats to the speaker for his educational spirit

  • @mohammadsadeghashrafpoor6737
    @mohammadsadeghashrafpoor6737 11 місяців тому +4

    It was the greatest lecture that i've seen about this topic
    I really needed to understand how it works by real fibers instead of just seeing some slides ❤

  • @drvignesh
    @drvignesh 8 років тому +1

    Thought provoking and interesting info regarding single photons!

  • @drarp
    @drarp 6 років тому +28

    The real content starts at 9:01

  • @ArpitAgarwal1
    @ArpitAgarwal1 9 років тому +5

    very insightful in the field of SPS and detector

  • @aroopkantibose1373
    @aroopkantibose1373 3 роки тому +3

    very nice talk

  • @rastislavblablabla3615
    @rastislavblablabla3615 5 років тому +2

    Excellent lecture. Do you have it in written form? I come from Slovakia and some things I do not understand well and I would like to read it all.

  • @GdncHfjbdkf
    @GdncHfjbdkf 4 місяці тому

    This light detectors how much photons can you see?, no more than three

  • @engx3733
    @engx3733 4 роки тому

    We are dealing with pulse issue with our quantum device running at quanta - Is there any detector that can solve this issue?

  • @abdulrahmanalbarqi5992
    @abdulrahmanalbarqi5992 7 місяців тому

    Nice lecture. i was wondering how can you distinguish between initial detection and after pulse detection? thank you 01:14:00

  • @alexandriahephaestrin634
    @alexandriahephaestrin634 2 роки тому

    The link is not working

  • @BrendaEM
    @BrendaEM 5 років тому +1

    Thank you for posting this : )

  • @phyozeng223
    @phyozeng223 3 роки тому +1

    Great talk!

  • @jasonbourne7179
    @jasonbourne7179 2 роки тому

    Approved for 30k.

  • @veronicanoordzee6440
    @veronicanoordzee6440 8 місяців тому

    MODERN PHYSICS IS BECOMING A RELIGION: A LOT OF PREACHTERMEN SPEAK ABOUT ALL KINDS OF PHENOMENA, BUT THEY MAKE NO EFFORT AT ALL TO PROVE THEIR CLAIMS. ARE YOU A BELIEVER TOO?

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 7 місяців тому +1

      @veronicanoordzee6440: you do not have to shout!! (caps)- the only 'religion' is working hard in college to get your good grades, and get a job... :/

    • @veronicanoordzee6440
      @veronicanoordzee6440 7 місяців тому

      @@bobm4378 YEP, IN LIFE YOU GET FEW THINGS FOR FREE. GOOD LUCK! P.S. WHEN YOUR PERSONAL PHOTON-RECEPTORS DON'T WORK THAT WELL, "SHOUTING" BECOMES INEVITABLE ;-)

  • @kratos5186
    @kratos5186 5 років тому

    I'm confused.Aura is light.,but we can't see that light with naked eye?

    • @MrSupervin94
      @MrSupervin94 5 років тому +2

      It’s ok lord Dracula, always stay away from light if you don’t want to die

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 роки тому

      Some of this talk is bs for sure.

  • @jamesstewart7212
    @jamesstewart7212 3 роки тому

    Any thought on the size of a photon? Could they be large or very large but the detection efficiency low?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 роки тому +1

      Photons are energy. Energy doesn't have a size.

    • @jamesstewart7212
      @jamesstewart7212 2 роки тому

      @@schmetterling4477 Photons have momentum, can be discreet (photoelectric effect) or wavelike (interference). The wavelength can be miles long (radio) or discreet (gamma). But no size?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 роки тому +1

      @@jamesstewart7212 Photons are irreversible energy transfers between an electromagnetic field and an external system. A photon never shows interference effects. Only the quantum mechanical ensemble of an em field does. Most people, many physicists included, are having a hard time distinguishing between one photon and many (the ensemble).

    • @jamesstewart7212
      @jamesstewart7212 2 роки тому

      @@schmetterling4477 Thank you for your thoughtful response. Your photon is a verb. I'll be thinking about that one.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 роки тому +1

      @@schmetterling4477 So how do they know when they get a single photon then?

  • @WalterSamuels
    @WalterSamuels 11 місяців тому +1

    The delusion of the "single photon". There is no such thing. The size of a "single photon" is always relative to the emitting particle's energy, and the energy received by that particle.

    • @INDIOBRAVOO
      @INDIOBRAVOO 11 місяців тому +2

      It's a cult bro

    • @bobm4378
      @bobm4378 7 місяців тому

      problem is, most of this is defined by MATH.. If you are in college, and want to pass, you do what the *ancient* books say... 'reality' has nothing to do with it..
      and do note 'energy' has only a level, and 'size' has a level AND length..

  • @sudeephalder5077
    @sudeephalder5077 2 роки тому

    Please provides the answers.
    How single photon can be produced from a continuous laser source ??? Explain in details pl
    Can we use pulse laser as an replacenent of single photon source , if not how these two differ???

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Рік тому

      A photon is simply an irreversible energy transfer between an electromagnetic field and an external system. It doesn't take a laser or a pulsed source to detect a photon and a single detection will tell us absolutely nothing about the source.

  • @عبدالعزيزيونس-ذ9ظ
    @عبدالعزيزيونس-ذ9ظ 3 роки тому

    In theoretical physics, what if photon is actually two photons sharing the same room.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 роки тому

      Then the wave function is fully symmetric. Bosons like to do it that way. ;-)

  • @qualquan
    @qualquan 3 роки тому +1

    unhelpful

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 3 роки тому +1

      What was unhelpful about it?

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 роки тому

      I agree. Total word salad no proper scientific substance.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 2 роки тому +1

      @@rl7012 I advice you to read a book on Quantum Optics.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 роки тому

      @@jacobvandijk6525 Why? It won't explain how they isolate a single photon and shoot it will it? I advice you to learn to think for yourself sunshine.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 2 роки тому +1

      @@rl7012 Why? I thought you were searching for "proper scientific substance". If not, dream on.

  • @ddstar
    @ddstar 4 роки тому +1

    46:34 totally and absolutely wrong. Read Steinmetz, Faraday and Maxwell and then Tesla. None of this is true. That's the part when relativity breaks down and quantum becomes a dumb thing. There is a spacial void between the two plates and only blue light can traverse through the because of its wave length properties. Lower frequency light bends more when it comes in contact with the magnet field, so you never see a connection of the circuit.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 3 роки тому +2

      A chocolate Santa/cookie package is on the way to you.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 роки тому

      @@schmetterling4477 Your the one that needs the care package.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 2 роки тому

      That is not the only place he is wrong.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 роки тому +1

      @@rl7012 Why are you so angry at people who know more than you? Did you have a bad time in high school science class? Does the humiliation sit that deep? Dudes, you need help to overcome your knowledge-phobias. :-)