I don't even care that much about performance for the most of those graphic cards but i watch your all videos because they are really enjoyable. Keep it up dude:)
The 1050 Ti is the Corolla of graphic cards. Not too fast, not fancy, not really nice but it is always there and get the job done. And its value for price is great. I used it for 3 years before I upgraded, it gave me a lot of fun
it used to be a great card, i have one, but i cant run cs2 at more than 100 fps in a 10 game lobby while i ran csgo at 250fps in a 20 game ffa dm in csgo. when i join a valve deathmatch in cs2 im getting 40ish fps with freezes every few seconds on the lowest settings possible.
Holy shit the reworked Inferno looks insanely good graphically, the fact that it runs on 100+ FPS on 1050 Ti while looking that good is pretty crazy. They did excellent job with the optimization since Inferno was completely reworked for CS2 and has much more detail than Dust 2 but still runs better.
first of all, saying that it should be "at least 300fps" is ridiculous on its own since 120+ FPS is already considered as high refresh rate. Second, you completely ignore the fact that it's getting 100+ fps on a GPU that released in 2016 and now costs 150$ or under 100$ for used 1050 Ti. Any GPU from 2018 to current time (RTX generation with AMD's counterpart GPUs) will run this pretty seamlessly at minimum 200 fps.@@SB3_01
15 minutes ago I started looking for videos with the 6700 XT test in CS 2, but I didn’t find any adequate ones. And as soon as I go to the main page of UA-cam, I immediately get a video of your test! Nice job bro! I'm definitely looking forward to the 6700 XT video from you :)
the fact GTX 1050 Ti i with 4 gb my graphic card im using for 5 years already bec i dont have that much money to buy a new one is nice to see someone using it for testing
Ive been huge fan of your channel for years now but recently ive found that putting your videos on in the background while studying has actually helped me focus on my work lol. Keep up the great work man
glad to see you getting cs2 access, been enjoying it lots, RTX3070 / 3700x running on 3440x1440 max settings with 4x msaa, i cant hold a steady 140 fps, but it runs fair enough, hope to see FSR 2 impremented sooner or later!
FSR2 is not possible on source 2, it still uses forward rendering with MSAA and some effects like volumetric lighting or shadows won't work without MSAA..
yep, after all those matches I played in cs2, I opened csgo, searched for the match, and first few kills was like "omg the spray is so easy man", meanwhile in cs2 I was struggling a lot (I have almost 1.4k hours)
@@lazix9769 I think it does, steam engine is really different, i feel like it renders things that you don't even look at. Maybe second one is a little bit different.
I have a 10 year old GPU (keep in mind that on CSGO i used to get 125-150fps on all maps). I can say that Mirage is the best and most optimized map. I checked all the maps in multiplayer. I get 40-50 fps on Mirage and like 15-25 on Inferno for example. Other maps aren't any better. Dust 2 I get 20-30 fps.
Your processor is helping the graphics card a lot haha, I have friends who play with the same graphics but with mid-range processors and they don't reach 200fps with everything low
Looks like the 1050 is about the minimum for a hi refresb rate experience. I can't help but want to so what the GT1030 would do, but also would not mind seeing what some lower end AMD's might perform like in this. I think it can be perfectly playable on the 1050 and similar, even if not high refresh rate all the time.
It depends on the processor, currently using a 1050TI 4GB GDDR5 with an i5 6600k and 16gb RAM, It never cross 110 fps even in 1080p 60hz low settings. its mainly his processor and ssd that is giving him a lot of fps.
Probably you should try one of the most popular GPU in the past - GTX 970/GTX 1060. And maybe play with the settings a little bit. High shadows can give information about player position
You need to try "high" graphics settings not all low. High has real time shadows which are a gamechanger and can give you an advantage. Many players are playing on high. Would be nice to know how much FPS you're giving up to see the shadows of enemies before they peak.
2 things on big text on the top there is something called practice 💀 and 2 "hrd" on performance is for extremely bad conditions since it makes the game grainy and in general look bad.
im on a 1050 (2gb) and an i5 12400f, 32 gb ram, playing at 1280x960 (4:3, no fsr, low settings with CMAA2 and hdr in quality), in the maps that only changed the lighting it tends to run pretty well, 200-250+ fps in avg, and in the reworked maps there is definitely a difference as it might drop down to 80-90 fps in a "normal" situation. The problem comes when there are smokes, molotovs, and similar, specially when shooting through smokes or when standing in a molotov, for some reason that drops the fps a lot, like seeing or standing in a smoke do drop the fps but it always stays over 60 fps and i would say always over 80fps, but shooting through smokes or being damaged/burn really drops fps, like 30-40fps for a brief moment, which is definitely noticeable. Lastly, when i open the game for the first time in the day, and i scope with an awp or ssg, it lags a little, but then it doesnt happen anymore. Even with 2gb vram i dont experience any fps drops, only a few when i die sometimes, which i think its pretty impressive tbh
@@zWORMzGaming In the title and preview of the video it is written about Gtx1050ti, if you want to test your video card in games, then do it wisely, because putting a powerful processor next to an average video card is not very good
11:54 if that's a few pixels then I on my old laptop must've been seeing a couple. Considering that I was running at something like 720x480 that would definitely make sense.
no, it's not only csgo with better graphics. Technically it's completely another game.But unfortunelty for me (idk for others), I can't even get more than 10-15 kills after almost 20 matches. Comparing to csgo I can easily get the same amonut of kills or even higher in short match. Something's wrong with cs2 like spray is not the same, movement is not the same, for me it's broken atm xD@@chase7974
this was my first nvidia gpu back in the day, i got it new in 2016 for dirt cheap (140$ us) was the zotac version and it was an overclocking monster it would easly rech 2000 MHz stable and the fans were bearly spinning the good old days of the 10 series
Csgo source 1 has a optional Vulkan api, with the launch option -vulkan it uses all the cores properly if you using Amd processors, on Nvidia uses almost 100% cores
he did play on casual which is 10 v 10 . expect better performance in compi matches by alot Even the bot match consumed cpu but i dont think it would matter for a stacked ryzen to work on 9 bots but still better fps in online 5v5
I've got a 6700m. It's been awesome. I'm currently playing starfield on it. The o lyrics issuebis the 6700m is only in like two different laptops, so it's not super common to find.
@@user-wq9mw2xz3j Looking at some benchmarks the rx 6700m has performance similar to an rx 6600 (maybe a little bit slower), so he probably gets 50-60 fps at 1080p low.
Idk how I feel about CS2 It runs well on my rig I have Asus Rog Crosshair V Formula Z with FX 8350 and Strix RX 570 4GB and 16GB Ram averaging about 100 fps but game needs a lot of work. I havent touched CS since it dropped the beta
Don't shoot through smokes, it's not the new thing, it's very easy to reveal your exact position when doing so and the opponent can shoot back and kill you, if you want to shoot through smokes you can do that when you're sure you saw somebody and you're pretty sure you'll get a kill after shooting a maximum of 4-5 bullets. Try a 3060ti, i have a ryzen 5 5700g for it and at times fps drops below 240 so it wouldn't be a very good experience for 240hz but i'm curious if it is the cpu's fault or just the game.
Can you test the gtx 1660 ti you testes in starfield please? That's my gpu and I'd like to play cs2 when the game drops. I've been watching for years. You're awesome Kryzzp!
Real matches on Inferno will lower ur fps even more? I'm asuming this not 100% if correct, i just remember there being a difference performance wise in csgo playing bots vs mm
The low settings in cs2 are not low they are still high you need to change the config file and change all manualy if you change the resolution again settings will revert to high again so you need to do all from config file and when you change to low from config you will see a massive difference
can you please another test for this ? I use 1050ti on a laptop and my fps was better during the limited test. After they release the game and few updates, my fps changed from 120 to 90's. Especially on Inferno and Overpass, I sometimes hit 60 fps
why didn't you try higher settings? the game seems to be running perfectly on low. i'm a 1050 user and i'm glad i'm able to run the game perfectly but still saddened i can't use the map editor until i upgrade my gpu soon
Thanks for vid! I'm 1050ti 4gb owner at the past, as well as GT 730m before it. For now I have 3060 12gb. So my growing formula is upgrade every 3-4 generation and increase class (30 -> 50ti -> 60). So next one might be 6070/6070ti (or AMD analogue). What do u think about all of this? (Just comment for channel activity 😊)
I was looking at your old benchmarking videos from 2+ years ago and u had on average 1m views. Now, your average is 20k - 80k views. Is this because people are not buying CPUs/GPUs right now due to the steep prices?
i wanna try cs2 but supposedly i need to be ranked, every game i play is against sweaty global 5 stacks kinda not fun. hope when they release i can start over playing at higher mm ratings is too toxic.
i personally think an RX-580 or 590 would be awsome to test in CSGO2 haha, but i think a 1650 or 1660 would be more realistic to look at for most CSGO2 players.
I don't even care that much about performance for the most of those graphic cards but i watch your all videos because they are really enjoyable. Keep it up dude:)
Thank you 😃
Based
Same here Brother
"shall we" is why i watch his videos:D
same
The 1050 Ti is the Corolla of graphic cards. Not too fast, not fancy, not really nice but it is always there and get the job done. And its value for price is great. I used it for 3 years before I upgraded, it gave me a lot of fun
so tell me, what is the Hilux of a GPU will be?
1080@@rizkijunir23
970 @@rizkijunir23
it used to be a great card, i have one, but i cant run cs2 at more than 100 fps in a 10 game lobby while i ran csgo at 250fps in a 20 game ffa dm in csgo. when i join a valve deathmatch in cs2 im getting 40ish fps with freezes every few seconds on the lowest settings possible.
@@zezanje1 i upgraded from a 1060 a few weeks back to a 3070, honestly i dont even see like a massive improvement in fps for cs2 lmao.
Holy shit the reworked Inferno looks insanely good graphically, the fact that it runs on 100+ FPS on 1050 Ti while looking that good is pretty crazy. They did excellent job with the optimization since Inferno was completely reworked for CS2 and has much more detail than Dust 2 but still runs better.
yeah, now its GPU bound, since they are not just using single core..
Meanwhile Starfield runs like shit and looks worse.....
100+ fps isnt good for CS2 on Inferno. It should be at least 300 fps.
first of all, saying that it should be "at least 300fps" is ridiculous on its own since 120+ FPS is already considered as high refresh rate. Second, you completely ignore the fact that it's getting 100+ fps on a GPU that released in 2016 and now costs 150$ or under 100$ for used 1050 Ti. Any GPU from 2018 to current time (RTX generation with AMD's counterpart GPUs) will run this pretty seamlessly at minimum 200 fps.@@SB3_01
@@SB3_01with a stone age card? Upgrade your PC bozo. Volvo is the best.
The most intensive part of this game is the water on the ancient map in t spawn when you walk and look down at it, try it in a practice bot match.
throwin a smoke on a molly and jumpin right in it afterwards drops fps heavily too
Hmm..i tried it by myself..bot kicked..spawned at T...fps stays
RX 6700 XT
DDR5 16GB
R5 7600
Try noclipping into water and shooting a P90 into it
15 minutes ago I started looking for videos with the 6700 XT test in CS 2, but I didn’t find any adequate ones.
And as soon as I go to the main page of UA-cam, I immediately get a video of your test!
Nice job bro!
I'm definitely looking forward to the 6700 XT video from you :)
I have a 6700 xt..i locked my fps to 144..if not it will go to more than 300 fps which is too much fps😂
To be precise 400-550 fps
440 fps on ancient tspawn water (following the user comment about fps drops here )
the fact GTX 1050 Ti i with 4 gb my graphic card im using for 5 years already bec i dont have that much money to buy a new one is nice to see someone using it for testing
Glad you were able to get your hands on the cs2 beta :D Cant wait to see you hit #1 on the leaderboards with a gt 710
GT 710 no amd HD 5450xd
Ive been huge fan of your channel for years now but recently ive found that putting your videos on in the background while studying has actually helped me focus on my work lol. Keep up the great work man
Love this engine! Scales beautifully to high or low end hardware while looking modern and gorgeous
glad to see you getting cs2 access, been enjoying it lots, RTX3070 / 3700x
running on 3440x1440 max settings with 4x msaa, i cant hold a steady 140 fps, but it runs fair enough, hope to see FSR 2 impremented sooner or later!
no way they are going to implement fsr2 atleast not in the next 3-4 years.
FSR2 is not possible on source 2, it still uses forward rendering with MSAA and some effects like volumetric lighting or shadows won't work without MSAA..
@@niks660097if fsr1 is possible on cs2 then so is fsr2
@@niks660097it keeps deleting my comment cause i have a link to reddit where it shows that cs2 is indeed in amd's list to recieve fsr2
@@E_lisa_afr tho yt keeps deleting random comments of mine and it drives me crazy
2:19 bro dropped the filthiest edit and thought we wouldn't notice
I may be Turkish but man I understand everything you say, your video is legendary
Congrats on getting access to the CS2 beta, I was wondering if you could test older CPUs like the 4770k. Nice video as always man
using it with 4790 and not getting anywhere near his fps
using 6700k, ı get 70-120 fps back with g4560 ı was getting 50-60 fps
I don't even have a PC. I think I would never even get one but I still love your content 💓
Thanks For The Benchmarks Was Waiting For You're Video
Good thing u got cs2 access, cant wait to see how other cards perform.
Looks great. I'd like to see a test with some older quad core i7's.
Also worth to note this is a 8v8, in a competitive match which is a 5v5, you'll get more fps more likely 200+ on 1080p
As someone with over 2k hours on CSGO I really hope they fix how sprays feel on CS2, it does not feel right at all
yep, after all those matches I played in cs2, I opened csgo, searched for the match, and first few kills was like "omg the spray is so easy man", meanwhile in cs2 I was struggling a lot (I have almost 1.4k hours)
game looks nicely optimized, really excited to get on cs with my mates again
Valve is doing best job, many objects don't even have textures from top just from the bottom you can see.
@@bravedragon thats common practice honestly
that doesn't matter they don't get rasterized if they're not on the screen/are being culled anyways.@@bravedragon
Yeah 2023 Best optimization cs2❤
@@lazix9769 I think it does, steam engine is really different, i feel like it renders things that you don't even look at. Maybe second one is a little bit different.
This is a game I wanted to see you play :D I'm really enjoying the game myself so far so I hope youll enjoy it aswell ❤
*Great to see some high FPS on this card*
Ok finally❤
Ah my previous gpu I had such amazing time with 1050 ti xD served me for years now upgraded to rx 6600 it was a legendary gpu ngl
Rx6600 is nice for cs2 but AAA Games are pretty mess despite 8gb are Not Future proof
@@Capybaraslay2 nah I play most of the games on high settings man idk what you talking abt ☠️
@@itzbatsygaming504 i personally own a rx6600 but regret in the end buying one especially for warzone
@@Capybaraslay2 what cpu do u use with it??
@@Capybaraslay2 and rams
Finally a video with a game that doesn't run like shit unless you buy a $2000 GPU.
Ppl doing benchmarks for knowledge
My dude here doing them for knowledge and fun (entertain the viewers)
I have a 10 year old GPU (keep in mind that on CSGO i used to get 125-150fps on all maps). I can say that Mirage is the best and most optimized map. I checked all the maps in multiplayer. I get 40-50 fps on Mirage and like 15-25 on Inferno for example. Other maps aren't any better. Dust 2 I get 20-30 fps.
Your processor is helping the graphics card a lot haha, I have friends who play with the same graphics but with mid-range processors and they don't reach 200fps with everything low
It's a cpu bottleneck
nice to see the 1050 ti still holds up you should try the gtx 970 just to see how this goes
holds up in cs go?;D
?@@Voltwall
playing with 970 and i5 6500, in 4:3 1280x960 res or something like that its doing pretty fine
it doesnt hold up, i have one and im running the game at 30 frames on the lowest settings on newer maps.
plus bc of water u lose like 40% of the fps@@zezanje1
kryzzp getting 100+ fps with a 1050ti while im getting 40-50fps but i do have an i3 4170 so thats probably part of the reason
That's definitely the reason, get an i7 and you'll be good :)
Great video as always and and wating for the 4080 performance in this game
i wasnt invited yet, but now i know how my brick will handle it. im pairing it with ryzen 5700x lmao
Looks like the 1050 is about the minimum for a hi refresb rate experience. I can't help but want to so what the GT1030 would do, but also would not mind seeing what some lower end AMD's might perform like in this.
I think it can be perfectly playable on the 1050 and similar, even if not high refresh rate all the time.
It depends on the processor, currently using a 1050TI 4GB GDDR5 with an i5 6600k and 16gb RAM, It never cross 110 fps even in 1080p 60hz low settings.
its mainly his processor and ssd that is giving him a lot of fps.
I'm excited for more benchmarks on this game :D
How are you getting 150-220 fps with a 1050ti?
I'm getting a constant 200 fps with a 3060.
Is it really the CPU difference? I'm on an i9 9900k
This is my exact graphics card thank you for testing it I love your vids btw
Yes me too, I can't wait for CS2 release.
@@ScarOne314 lol i already have for more than 2 weeks...just bought gtx 1650 gddr6 to play it.
I was wondering why you are not playing CS2 beta, I was going to tell you about the CS2 but you did it. Keep it up!!
Just got access :)
I would've tested it before but I didn't have it!
FINALLY Krryzp starting to test CS2
much better frametime than csgo
fiinally 2023game not stuterry
Great Video, as always🤗
Thank you 😃
This game looks way better than slowfield!
Hahhahahah❤
Graphically it does not look better than StarField.
Probably you should try one of the most popular GPU in the past - GTX 970/GTX 1060. And maybe play with the settings a little bit. High shadows can give information about player position
I think, the shadows option doesn't work like that in cs2, because most things are server-sided, not client-sided like the shadows you mentioned
@@szymeq3116🤦 the shadows literally give you an advantage. the shadows are both client sided and server sided
We need cpu tests for this game, it's quite cou heavy for 144hz+
Nice to see an actually well optimised game.
Well optimised for a comp FPS always means 100+FPS on the shitiest shit on earth. How else would Russian Warzone soldiers play this
hahaha what? it is a game from 2000's and 2010 graphics, and it drops to 50 fps and sometimes total freeze.
Compared to the 2023 games, this is amazingly optimized!
Compared to CSGO or overwatch, it's meh
Yeah cs2 is most optimized game in 2023❤
@@user-wq9mw2xz3jk, go back to your warzone 2 match
You need to try "high" graphics settings not all low. High has real time shadows which are a gamechanger and can give you an advantage. Many players are playing on high. Would be nice to know how much FPS you're giving up to see the shadows of enemies before they peak.
Real time baked shadows*
it runs better than i thought it will be
Btw inferno map test is not right because the bots are taking much fps because its local jk try doing it in a normal match pls 12:33
Doesn't matter, it's not CPU bound
@@zWORMzGamingtrust me brothet it is matter you ll get surprised try it
2 things on big text on the top there is something called practice 💀 and 2 "hrd" on performance is for extremely bad conditions since it makes the game grainy and in general look bad.
im on a 1050 (2gb) and an i5 12400f, 32 gb ram, playing at 1280x960 (4:3, no fsr, low settings with CMAA2 and hdr in quality), in the maps that only changed the lighting it tends to run pretty well, 200-250+ fps in avg, and in the reworked maps there is definitely a difference as it might drop down to 80-90 fps in a "normal" situation. The problem comes when there are smokes, molotovs, and similar, specially when shooting through smokes or when standing in a molotov, for some reason that drops the fps a lot, like seeing or standing in a smoke do drop the fps but it always stays over 60 fps and i would say always over 80fps, but shooting through smokes or being damaged/burn really drops fps, like 30-40fps for a brief moment, which is definitely noticeable.
Lastly, when i open the game for the first time in the day, and i scope with an awp or ssg, it lags a little, but then it doesnt happen anymore.
Even with 2gb vram i dont experience any fps drops, only a few when i die sometimes, which i think its pretty impressive tbh
*Flash bangs do almost nothing outside. It would have to detonate literally right beside you to have any effect.
Here, basically everything is pulled by the processor, it would be better to install some i5-3470 or i5-3570K
Then it would be a CPU test.
@@zWORMzGaming In the title and preview of the video it is written about Gtx1050ti, if you want to test your video card in games, then do it wisely, because putting a powerful processor next to an average video card is not very good
11:54 if that's a few pixels then I on my old laptop must've been seeing a couple.
Considering that I was running at something like 720x480 that would definitely make sense.
Game is Really Optimized Considering how good the Graphics looks!! unlike StarField, and new games we got in 2023
Yeah, but this is literally just CS:GO with better graphics. Of course it's still going to run good.
no, it's not only csgo with better graphics. Technically it's completely another game.But unfortunelty for me (idk for others), I can't even get more than 10-15 kills after almost 20 matches. Comparing to csgo I can easily get the same amonut of kills or even higher in short match. Something's wrong with cs2 like spray is not the same, movement is not the same, for me it's broken atm xD@@chase7974
@@chase7974 if its just csgo the why create CSGO2?
optimization is still long way to go but knowing valve how they responds to the feedback regarding cs2, I am really hopeful.
Thank you for the cs2 test, but can you please test an old cpu? Maybe some i5 2nd-4th gen?
Idk Will be❤
Honestly Ratchet & clank rift apart would be great for the GPU testing series as well.
this was my first nvidia gpu back in the day, i got it new in 2016 for dirt cheap (140$ us) was the zotac version and it was an overclocking monster it would easly rech 2000 MHz stable and the fans were bearly spinning the good old days of the 10 series
heh, me here in latam for people my type the 10 series is just starting HAHAH
Do you feel the frametime pacing is really bad in cs2 beta? Like even if you're on 144hz+, the game feels like its running on 60 hz on screen
Did you checked in game fps with msi afterburner
@@prateekpanwar646Ain't that, it's the game, for some users (it's still beta) only weird thing i experienced was 1 crash till today
@@lemonhaze715 In that case, “Valve pl fix”
@@lemonhaze715 Any info when cs will release?
Bruh, i got 150-240 fps with my 3060ti+R5 5600x pc? How dude and my gpu working %60-70. Cpu %40-50 is something wrong on my pc?
Nothing's wrong, you need a faster CPU to get more FPS
@@zWORMzGaming everyone saying "its good CPU for your GPU " ? And so many youtuber making systems with this 3060ti+5600x combination?
did you know counter strike 2 is actually really well optimized for the cpu and now its more gpu intensive
Csgo source 1 has a optional Vulkan api, with the launch option -vulkan it uses all the cores properly if you using Amd processors, on Nvidia uses almost 100% cores
I have 1050ti and i don’t get more then 150 and it lags hard someone knows a fix for this?
Damn congratulations on CS2
he did play on casual which is 10 v 10 . expect better performance in compi matches by alot
Even the bot match consumed cpu but i dont think it would matter for a stacked ryzen to work on 9 bots but still better fps in online 5v5
Valve saw what Blizzard was doing with Overwatch 2 and said: Write that down, write that down!
Can you maybe in the future test laptops whit amd gpus like the rx 6700m?
I've got a 6700m. It's been awesome. I'm currently playing starfield on it. The o lyrics issuebis the 6700m is only in like two different laptops, so it's not super common to find.
@mrfilcritic haha starfield on it, what, 720p low settings?
@user-wq9mw2xz3j actually runs pretty solid at 1440p medium settings, 40-60 fps.
@@user-wq9mw2xz3j Looking at some benchmarks the rx 6700m has performance similar to an rx 6600 (maybe a little bit slower), so he probably gets 50-60 fps at 1080p low.
Yeah ❤
I wish they reworked every map through the years, the non reworked maps are nothing compared to Inferno and italy in Graphics.
Idk how I feel about CS2
It runs well on my rig I have Asus Rog Crosshair V Formula Z with FX 8350 and Strix RX 570 4GB and 16GB Ram averaging about 100 fps but game needs a lot of work. I havent touched CS since it dropped the beta
Pretty good for the old FX actually, I'm impressed
Kryzzp, qual esse fone que você está usando? Lindíssimo.
Don't shoot through smokes, it's not the new thing, it's very easy to reveal your exact position when doing so and the opponent can shoot back and kill you, if you want to shoot through smokes you can do that when you're sure you saw somebody and you're pretty sure you'll get a kill after shooting a maximum of 4-5 bullets.
Try a 3060ti, i have a ryzen 5 5700g for it and at times fps drops below 240 so it wouldn't be a very good experience for 240hz but i'm curious if it is the cpu's fault or just the game.
I tried 1440p, max settings. Got a drop to 280fps on ancient around t spawn area, got around 350fps on dust 2 / inferno. Rtx 4090 / 7800x3d here
Online shooters always got the best fps. I wish i still played online shooters but I quit while im ahead
Great video!! although I can't play cs2, the fact that I can't aim down the sights, kills the game for me!
Bro aint got NO idea how cs plays
😂😂@@marlibeshaj1069
You need prime and rank to play wait or buy prime 20e❤
@@mhpross1234I only have prime but don't have any comp rank cause I only play Casual 😢
Play competitive and earn points for rank❤
This is honestly impressive
Can you try integrated graphics in cs2 ? Just curious is it still playable in that. Thanks
Looking forward to the RTX 4080 test on all the resolutions, like 768p all the way to 8K 👀
Can you test the gtx 1660 ti you testes in starfield please? That's my gpu and I'd like to play cs2 when the game drops. I've been watching for years. You're awesome Kryzzp!
You should collaborate with Dawad does tech stuff. The vibe would be amazing lol
Please, youtuber sir, test the RX 7800XT 16GB someday! I want to buy it, and you are the only youtuber that i trust for the benchmarks. Thanks.
We’re all waiting for the GT 1030 🤘
you should definitely test it on older cpus like 1st or 2nd gen ryzen and older intel like 4th, 6th, 8th gen
I agree
Dayum this happens when developers actually take their time to optimize their game
please compare starfield with rage 2 please rage 2 looks good and performs better .
What no it doesn't 🤣🤣🤣
@@phantompoke2378 yes it does.
Yeah but older xd old is best❤
@@mhpross1234 yessssssss
Real matches on Inferno will lower ur fps even more? I'm asuming this not 100% if correct, i just remember there being a difference performance wise in csgo playing bots vs mm
How do you think it would run on my pc,
I3-2100
Geforce Gt 1030
12gb ddr3 Ram
With a HDD
Can i even play it?
Atleast Valve optimizes their games. Unlike most other companies in 2023
The low settings in cs2 are not low they are still high you need to change the config file and change all manualy if you change the resolution again settings will revert to high again so you need to do all from config file and when you change to low from config you will see a massive difference
can you please another test for this ? I use 1050ti on a laptop and my fps was better during the limited test. After they release the game and few updates, my fps changed from 120 to 90's. Especially on Inferno and Overpass, I sometimes hit 60 fps
why didn't you try higher settings? the game seems to be running perfectly on low.
i'm a 1050 user and i'm glad i'm able to run the game perfectly but still saddened i can't use the map editor until i upgrade my gpu soon
Thanks for vid! I'm 1050ti 4gb owner at the past, as well as GT 730m before it. For now I have 3060 12gb. So my growing formula is upgrade every 3-4 generation and increase class (30 -> 50ti -> 60). So next one might be 6070/6070ti (or AMD analogue). What do u think about all of this? (Just comment for channel activity 😊)
Your next upgrade should be amd cause it's more future proof especially with the vram well have fun with 3060
i love you
im biggest fan finnaly cs2 iyou heard my tutorial
does it have dlss .... thanx for the great video ... keep up the great work
I was looking at your old benchmarking videos from 2+ years ago and u had on average 1m views. Now, your average is 20k - 80k views. Is this because people are not buying CPUs/GPUs right now due to the steep prices?
i wanna try cs2 but supposedly i need to be ranked, every game i play is against sweaty global 5 stacks kinda not fun. hope when they release i can start over playing at higher mm ratings is too toxic.
remember dust 2 is not demanding map there is overpass water and ancient t-base
Tuscan ❤
You know the drill, Kryzzp. Now test the gt710 on it. And want it for yesterday.
rx 570 next please!
Idk❤
Can you try more gpus on this game please? maybe a 6800xt/6700xt ? thanks!
Ah 🥲 My old card ,just switched to rx6700xt this year .
Still waiting on rx 6700xt rdr 2
You Will not see you comment like mine😢
i personally think an RX-580 or 590 would be awsome to test in CSGO2 haha, but i think a 1650 or 1660 would be more realistic to look at for most CSGO2 players.
i got rx 580 bro 8 gb
@@mhpross1234 i have an rx-590 red devil paired with an i7-2700k
Good paring not bad
I7 2700k oc Will be good
@@mhpross1234 definitely and thank you, ill be getting a 3770k to upgrade for pcie 3.0 soon enough though. when i can find one for the right price
can you test a 2gb gpu? I think it would be interesting as in your video msi afterburner was showing about 3gb of vram usage