Lagrange Multipliers - Force of constraint for a disk rolling down an incline

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 жов 2024
  • A disk with a mass m and radius R rolls down an incline angled alpha above the horizontal. Here's how to find the equation of motion and the force of constraint using Lagrange multipliers.
    Second Semester Classical Mechanics Playlist
    • Classical Mechanics 2 ...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @fizixx
    @fizixx Рік тому +2

    Nice run-through for these two methods!

  • @andyrundquist7672
    @andyrundquist7672 Рік тому +2

    It's interesting that we tend to need the second time derivative of the constraint equation, rather than just it by itself when solving for the equations of motion. I realized that when I was playing around and I realized that if I told Mathematica to honor the second derivative of the constraint equation it's able to integrate all the equations. If I just give it the constraint it (usually) fails. But if you give it the second derivative of the constraint you have to be really careful with your initial conditions. If you give the variables an initial velocity such that the first derivative of the constraint isn't zero, that solution will have that constraint constantly growing! That took me a while to figure out.

  • @fcvgarcia
    @fcvgarcia 10 місяців тому

    Thanks for the great explanation!

  • @williamperez-hernandez3968
    @williamperez-hernandez3968 Рік тому

    Comment on the signs. The torque is negative, so in R×friction, friction is not the magnitud but the component along the plane. That is OK, we saw it was negative by Langrange method. Care must be taken for the accelerations. Note s=R(theta) is taking both variables as positive, as was done here. But the derivatives have opposite signs, sdot > 0 while thetadot < 0. Same is true for the second derivates. Therefore sddot = - R (thetaddot).

  • @nishchayy
    @nishchayy Рік тому

    16:18 friction force = I *theta double dot / R square... I think you miss the square on R

  • @rajvardhansinghsisodiya1095
    @rajvardhansinghsisodiya1095 Місяць тому

    Why dont you find constraint in theta ??

  • @sahidtenorio601
    @sahidtenorio601 Рік тому

    Sir. The KE of a rotating body is T = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iw^2... Not theta dot

    • @DotPhysics
      @DotPhysics  Рік тому +1

      Sorry - I don't remember exactly what's there, but it looks like I have (1/2)*I*thetadot^2, right?

    • @FULLAWESOMENESS12
      @FULLAWESOMENESS12 Рік тому

      Theta dot = omega