Guilty people hate cameras, cops who get riled by a camera legally pointed at them, know they might do something illegal or something else that would get them in trouble if posted on YT and just want a free hand to do and say how they want to, whether it is within the law or not.
@shanemooney6118 Not even close....they just hate to have their criminal, unlawful behavior exposed. The Body-cams worn by police have been the best thing ever, because it has caught their acts on camera and helped get rid of hundreds of the tyrants/Bullies/and thugs.
Right! A basic summary of this video that I got basically supports the corruptness of "justice". There is no actual rules, they just make crap up and do what they want until someone does it to them then they turn around!
Exactly ! I was in courtroom and told judge , I was going to record and that I have that right , due to the fact there are cameras recording me during court. Judge , dismissed case !
There are law societies that have the power to suspend or terminate judges and lawyers. Some society boards are better than others. Theres always the flip side of exposing these corrupt assholes. Remember if the lawyer is corrupt, excessive drinking and drugging etc, they have nasty criminal connections. So have your own righteous gang or a very good plan in place. I live in Canada, Greater Vancouver area in a predominantly brown neighbourhood. Good lawyers get assaulted by the bullies. Some lawyers have formal complaints lodged against them and are either suspended or lose their license to practice law in the courts. I am always respectful to the cops here. Some police have been very good here and some not so much. It is very stressful watching the swat team in action. You know when you have different members from different gangs watching and circling your half decent neighbourhood that something is in the works and to be careful. Be ssfe. Peace love joy. Its time to make our homes back into a garden of art, enlightment oeace joy progress advancement. Look at the beautiful ancient architecture and carvings mosaics pottery paintings etc.
@@noellane3808 We need to figure out how this technology works and how we can block it. For instance I watched another video where they talked about simply putting a sheet of metal between you and the wall penetrating camera with enough to block its view. (I guess we all know why aluminum siding was replaced with vinyl siding. 😏)
@@kenkneram4819 Reflective Styrofoam insulation can block the view. Just lean a big sheet up against the wall. No need to install it. Double sides reflective foam insulation might even be better. Plain sheet metal will slow things down but not stop things if you are sitting still for a while.
I have a late friend who had a camera-happy neighbor. That neighbor learned how a well-placed mirror reflecting direct sunlight really can negate the function of any camera.
@@dakota9821 ONLY IN PUBLIC. In your home and 'curtilage' (I'll let you look that up) you have a Constitutional and US Supreme Court affirmed right to expectation of privacy.
i already regret it.. I'm in IT, and i dont even know the full extent of what is possible. What i do know however, scares me to death and makes me want to go live with the Amish. I am not joking. You think you have privacy? HAHAHAHAHA. your phone is tracking, listening and knowing everything about you. and you willingly give it away. and that's just the start.
what are you going to think when you come to the realization that any RF can be used as radar, which can create 3D real-time surveillance that penetrates most walls ie... cell phones and wifi pro tip: wavelength dictates image resolution
I used to believe that if you had done nothing wrong , you had nothing to fear from surveillence but in this dystopian era ,wrong is called right and right is called wrong
Even with a warrant this is still very troubling, not all warrants are in good faith because judges are also corrupt and will recklessly sign off on a warrant.
If someone noticed that a camera is pointing at your house can you put in a privacy fence, then off set a few feet behind it another section of privacy fence with a message that says "f**k the police" on it and place it on two thick pieces of pipe and located on your property in a position that blocks the camera from being able to see over a 6 foot privacy fence with a code lock on the gate. Assuming the private fence doesn't violate any city ordances.?
@@-Nickname- If I follow you in traffic for the rest of your life you will eventually screw up and I will be able to give you a ticket, And because of that I will keep following you until I can get something from it. That's called harassment, That's called stalking, You follow anyone for any period of time and they will eventually do something that could get them in trouble. blindly putting your faith in something because you think you don't do anything wrong is absolutely absurd. cops are not your friends they are tax collectors they are only there to increase the prison population so that some politician can get richer, they're only there to collect fees for you breaking some traffic law so that's the city purse can get bigger. quit blindly trusting authority.
@@Crazy-Chicken-Media If I screw up, then I deserve that ticket. The key to avoiding tickets is follow the rules and don't screw up. It's not that hard. Hyperbole. It's not stalking when it's done by law enforcement for the purposes of enforcing the law. Words have specific definitions for a reason. Use them correctly or don't use them at all. You sound like some kid that was raised by a paranoid conspiracy theorist. It ain't that deep, junior. There may be a few bad apples, but the vast majority are just trying to do their job to protect innocent people.
Meantime, if I have somebody private citizen sitting outside my house, watching me in my family for eighteen months , i'm pretty sure that they would find that that's stalking
@@JayPlaysEverything soo many cases dont even show them self cz the person is inocent and dosent even know is being watch... Soo that Logic dosent really work...
@@РомаПетров-ж1н How would you like it if a regualr person put on cameras outside your house, and watched and harassed you night and day? Wouldn't you report them for stalking? The police have no more rights than anyone else, they can't break the law either. Yes, they can do temporary surveillance, but they need to go to a judge to present evidence and get a warrant if they want to stalk you, just not have a feeling something is happening.
You may not have a expectation of privacy in the sense that people can see your activity when you leave your house, but NOBODY expects to have all your activities, tracked, documented, and scrutinized and analyzed everytime they leave their house!!!!!! Otherwise, their house is just a builder cage or jail.
Law enforcement is spending huge amounts creating a complete surveillance state that can track everyone 24/7 while actual violent criminals get away with brutalizing innocents on a regular basis. Priorities, you know.
Except the surveillance web they weave includes themselves by default without realizing this because so much is put in place by each and every other LE agency.
Yes, it’s called the Sting Ray system. No warrant needed under the “Agreement” signed with the maker, Raytheon and FISA. In the case of the Sting Ray system they spoof multiple cell towers and listen to your phone conversations. Beat down in Funky Town, TX uses this in conjunction with the pole cameras. The case law SCOTUS uses for this needs to be updated. They also use drones over your backyard to help the Code Nazi’s to make obscene amounts of revenue.
@@MajorReynolds92 We need access to those.. pronto! Let's police the police.. I can write dickets too... not that f'n hard.. won't have to lie either... blue gangbangers are sloppy lawbreakers.
@@MrAkaprimetimeA MASER would do it. A camera cannot see Microwave radio radiation. But if the MASER has enough Wattage it will fry the cameras electronics.
According to Our Gov: Spying, Violence, Lying,Theft, & Corruption of Any Kind is Unacceptable in our Society... Unless the Spying, Violence, Lying, Theft, & Corruption is Perpetrated by the Gov!
@@dustyking8851stop watching crap news. Also, take a class on government. A president much be impeached by congress for acts taken while in office. It doesn't make sense that the institution the president resides over is in charge of his prosecution.
George knew exactly how his fellow leftists operate l, he knew what they woukd do in the future because he was one himself, he understood their thought process and where it woukd lead, and we've been voting them into power for decades. Also Cops are some of the biggest left wing socalist extremist there are, they just play pretend conservative.
Viewing from the sidewalk at normal human height is not the same as viewing from 15 -25 feet up a pole. I would consider this an invasion of privacy if one has a wood fence around the property.
yes, and anything that is only visible from that height should not be admissible, unless they had A warrant at the time. If A person cannot view it from A sidewalk they should have to get A warrant. Maybe it would be A good idea for such cameras to not be allowed to be greater than 7 feet high.
IR lights blind digital cameras or wash them out, but are invisible to the human eye. This is the working mechanism of lower end night vision system, and is why video cameras can often give brighter video than what a human can see. A proper security camera setup might have IR spot lights to back up the camera's own lower powered IR lights. Very bright IR lights or somewhat close lights can damage cameras that do not close the auto iris enough. Either way having flashing IR lights tends to cause the camera to chase it's tail opening and closing the iris to adjust the exposure. This can be a problem if you have a flickering IR light source which humans simply can't see to quickly troubleshoot a camera issue.
I won't go so far as to condone your comment at least not publicly even though I can't disagree with it. And I know that some years ago in the area of California called south-central Los Angeles (an area that is host to many the media politely chooses to refer to as "urban youth"), the city attempted to install pole cameras, in order to monitor for the criminal activity that was rampant in the area. To almost no one's surprise, the cameras received immediate attention from local residents including the aforementioned urban youth, who were less than thrilled at being on camera. The new camera network was only operational for a matter of days. Those cameras that were not totally destroyed, whether by air gun pellets, bullets, flung rocks, or thrown projectiles unknown, were soon rendered unable to monitor the area.
WERE As in Due to loose education and reason standards they incorretcly used "was" in place of "were" Breaking stereotypes is empowering and trully how you make progress to a better future for all
I wonder what would happen if someone were to place cameras looking over the fences of these "judges" that ruled it's not a violation of privacy and no search was conducted. PEEK-A-BOO!
I work for the largest DOT in the US and I wish I could take you into a certain camera control room. What I can say is that L3 Harris (a military defense contractor) are the contractors that install the cameras and update the software/algorithms periodically. Anyone in a major metropolitan area has seen along the streets and highways those tall poles with a generic looking black box on a gimbal mount up top. The viewing room is staffed with observers 24/7 and you need a security badge to get into those areas.
today ? I remind you that the United States used to have literal concentration camps where they threw away American citizens who were of Asian descent just for that fact. or that the Guantanamo base exists so that they can torture people who, being outside the country, no longer have guarantees and constitutional rights, even if they are citizens of the country. It's not a today thing
i don't think the electronic cameras in east germany were that ubiquitous however, the stasi did manage to make 1/3 of the citizens of the DDR snitch on someone as least once in their lifetime.
Nothing new there.. I had them gangstalking me for four solid years, attempting to set me up and entrap me, covering up crimes commited against me.. yep.. we are no different than the soviet union. Except the now the technology is totally different as I am electronically harassed and tortured 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
Trespassing is Trespassing! Supreme Court is committing treason for not upholding the US Constitution for WE the people!! Supporting cops over we the people is betrayal of the publics trust! Arrest all judges who fail to support the US Constitution as the Supreme law of the land!
Humanity is at a fork in the path. One way leads to an indefinite Dystopia. The other, to freedom. My generation, Gen X, is the last whose childhoods and, for many, young adulthood, were pretty free from the surveillance state. Once we’re gone, there won’t be anyone to tell the tale, “Once upon a time in America…” That sort of personal testimony is powerful. It’s hard to inspire youth, that a better future is possible, when there’s no one around to talk about a better past.
One of the problems with the pole cameras that clearly distinguishes them from the general public is that they can view your premises from on high. A fence would be useless against them. If some member of the general public was floating above your sidewalk at 10+ feet or hanging out in a tree on your front lawn spying into your yard and windows, I imagine that person would be breaking a number of laws. Additionally, one does not reasonably expect an individual to do such things. If it were a normal thing, we'd all have tall, visual blocking screens blocking such views into our space.
I lived in a city, no HOA, and they still had strict regularions on the size and placement of fences in the front yard. 3' from the sidewalk and I think 5' tall. It was something stupid short for a fence.
Establish a reasonable expectation of privacy. If possible, comply with the lower fences near the edge of the property for visibility and have an inner fence closer to the house that's 6' or taller. Look up regulations. In some areas a 2' solid trellis on top of a 6' fence is still considered a 6' fence.
Using "pole cameras" to monitor traffic in public places is not the same as pointing those same cameras at an individual's residence, where they have a long codified right to privacy. The 4th amendment is not just about searches and seizures, but guarantees the right of individuals to have "secure in their persons, their identities and their belongings" and have privacy in their own homes, as well as in non-public aspects of lives - if it is not clearly visible, it is "private" by virtue of the fact that a person made an effort to make it private by hiding it from view.
On a public pole. And how is the light pole or telephone pole as used to be called not the property of the Electric company. Does the police have a statement from each electric company to do that?
@@jamkajer 😎 U were Stalked by a drone, Myself I was stop at a stop light, noticed a helicopter just shadowing the buildings, the Helo, was a large Herkulese military terms, the lite turned green I moved thru the Intersection, continued down the road the Helo was just above me, I turned into a neighborhood stopped at the first Stop sign🛑. The Helo was over the local grade school, jus in front of me, I pulled out my 35mm camera an took snapshots, the Helo peeled away, left the area, last time that happened!
So now you have to surround your home with a concrete lined steel dome to prevent X-ray vision cameras from all directions and flying drones in order to ensure your privacy. Otherwise, they can watch through the walls and know exactly what style underwear you prefer. But then we need multiple secret tunnels leading into and out of your home so they can't know exactly who is entering and leaving your home, when, and how often. I'll bet if I were to set up a pole camera in front of the home of any SCOTUS judge, they would want it removed immediately.
They allowed intimidation of Scotus , which unlike Congress, is supposed to be protected from that. Schumer led the charge. No.... It should be every member of Congress...they supposedly make the Laws
If a camera is mounted on a pole then it sees things anyone walking down the street can't see. My head isn't 18 feet in the air. It's a warrantless search.
Also the fact that this information is being stored, as a person walking by cannot later reproduce video from merely looking at something should factor in to make it search.
I wish you’d bring up the subject of Flock Security and the usage of their cameras in public. How they’re used, who they’re connected to, potential for misuse, 4th Amendment concerns, etc. They will certainly be used to do great harm someday.
When the general public is allowed to use public poles to video public areas, then maybe we can have a debate. Law enforcement is over the line as well as other government agencies that have used "other" devises/tech to monitor "suspect" in "public". not to mention they singled out a subject without a warrant or civilian oversight. FOUL on this whole play.
Unfortunately if the camera is put on public property and aimed at private property it's legal. They ran this little scam on me for months and found out something. That me taking a piss and a shit in front of it every night got boring I guess.
So you buy an inexpensive pole (like a flag pole or a pole for Purple Martin houses) and erect it on your property as close to the utility pole as you can. On the top of the pole, place a banner or plate sign or whatever to block the camera view of your property.
Well I can't say your reaction was inapropriate! But the thing that surprises me is that they did not just checkmate you and send out a prowl car to arrest you for "public urination" or their usual catch-all, "indecent exposure". I actually know of two guys who were arrested for pissing on a wall at 2 AM coming home from a bar.
There is a world of difference between being able to casually observe the yard of a house and being able to record every second of every day for that yard, plus being able to look into windows from a vantage point that a casual observer never has. Private use of camera and other surveillance technology, including cookies, pixel tags, sale and purchase of financial, medical, and other personal data has become a huge threat to our personal safety as well as our privacy. It is time to put the brakes on all of this as it very rarely solves actual crimes committed against humanity. Solving so called crimes against the state such as violation of bans literally don't count. Most bans should not exist in the first place.
So, it's basically considered a high-tech stake out. I'm no fan of drug manufacturers, but I have to wonder how much manpower and money went into this 18 month long technological surveillance saga in order to get enough evidence to just get a warrant to be allowed to search the home of just one guy. Can you imagine how much actual good a town can do with that amount of resources?
Never mind 18 months - ten years here! Here in the UK they do that all the time. I must be of massive interest to them. Especially my comings and goings... like, I don't know, given that I'm severely disabled, medical staff, nurses, ambulances, then there's the grocery deliveries, pharmacy deliveries... meanwhile there's thousands starving but that's where tax payer's money goes...
I would argue that the camera is inciting civil disobedience. It may be legal, but in the older laws of manners that span the globe, staring (electronically included) is rude and disturbing.
Pole camers are mostly within city limits. That is 1 reason I do not live within the city limits of any town. The closest town is 18 miles away from my house. Where I live all the roads are Farm to Market Roads & County Roads. Out where the streets have NO NAMES.
Last I checked those poles belong to the utility company and are private property. Without even watching past 1:08 I can tell you this is illegal as all heck. Public view necessitates being on *public* property; If I'm not allowed to climb on top of them and sit there 24/7 neither are the cameras.
Thank you for posting this video! I live in Phoenix Az. We have been fighting to try to get the City of Phoenix to stop violating our privacy rights for years now. They don't use pole cameras (yet), that I know of, but they do go down the alleys behind our homes & climb up ladders & stand on trucks to look over EVERYONE'S 6ft+ block fences into our yards "Looking for violations" several times a month. They have also made it a "violation" to put up taller fences without getting special (& costly) "variance permits" & , sadly, growing privacy vegetation takes many years, to be even partially effective, & is not affordable by many ppl. in our neighborhood. Any ideas, aside from these, as to how we might stop their violations of our privacy?
They did this to me! It’s so messed up. I never was involved in a crime so nothing happened. But I was harassed, followed, and tracked by police/fraternal club. I put in a bid to run for city council cause I wanted to help my community. I’m not in the good ole boy club so when I put in my bid I was immediately gang stalked by my municipality.
Here in Australia, my local hotel has live video streaming straight to the police station. In fact, the whole town is under constant scrutiny with many cameras on many corners.
In Britain some departments of the law are actively using cameras that can penetrate two concrete walls easily and now have a system of eye tracking you through walls (most likely using 3D representation of the room you're in to calculate what you are looking at in your home), and are actively using this technology for more than a decade on certain individuals! These technologies and how these agencies are increasingly abusing them, is getting out of hand, but what are we to do when there are people who are willing to go along with the laws being broken in such ways and staying silent once they are payed?
I know, I'm in the UK. They are not even trying to hide it because they assume that I'm of low intelligence and don't understand what they are doing. Got the van outside my house as we speak... since August 2014 it's been going on. Vans since November 2023.
@@LittleKitty22 If you're not a cop. I'll tell you, if they really wanted to they would set up shop in a room adjacent to you and set their equipment. It takes only a few hours to set up all of their equipment! If you're right, and not mentally ill or delusion, good luck mate, you're a bit screwed in todays society! Plus, it's probably a matter of time before they come busting through your door too (they want your ass and won't mind setting you up to get it)!
I also think there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in an unfenced yard too, and cameras recording and storing info 24 hours a day is just weird. Theres a big difference in someone observing me by driving by but knowing I'm on camera 24 hours a day I wouldnt feel comfortable ever going in my own yard.
@@gfy2979yea tell my nosy neighbors that, got cams fixed on my front and back entrance, when I'm bringing out many bags of trash I can hear there phone notifications going off multiple times lol but I feel uneasy about being watched all the time.
There is no expectation of privacy for anything that can be seen from a public vantage point. This is the same argument that 1st Amendment auditors use on government and public offices. Want to sit outside of a power utility station and record the comings and goings, no problem. As long as you are on public property, there is nothing they can do. I don't see an issue here either. As long as the police are authorized to use such devices, its no different than an individual sitting outside your home, ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, watching. You may not like it, but there is no law against it. And be careful about pushing for a law to stop this behavior. It can be used against you or those that use public property to monitor and record unlawful police and other government personnel. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Feel free to think that, it is not based in logic or reason though. If you are visible from public eye, you have no lawful expectation of privacy from it's view. Say for example you have a fence and the police mount a camera high enough that it can observe areas ordinarially obscured to the public walking by, THEN you have a reasonable claim against that camera.
A CAMERA IS A PERPETUAL SEARCH, it is tireless, endless and can spy at great distances without ceasing ANY use of ANY camera should always require a warrant
It should be was the video accidental or was it targeted. I think it should be a search if a suspect is targeted. "suspect" implies they have articulable reason to justify the observations and thus they should be required to get warrant.
The cops use thermal imaging all the time. This is why lead paint was banned years ago. The military was developing thermal imaging 45+ years ago and lead paint blocked quite a bit of the ability.
The country is going to be shocked when they find out that the college murders in Idaho were voice recorded by a camera outside on a telephone pole camera that belonged to the city. It happened at a college sorority. What business did that city have micing up those pole cameras?
Humanity is at a fork in the path. One way leads to an indefinite Dystopia. The other, to freedom. My generation, Gen X, is the last whose childhoods and, for many, young adulthood, were pretty free from the surveillance state. Once we’re gone, there won’t be anyone to tell the tale, “Once upon a time in America…” That sort of personal testimony is powerful. It’s hard to inspire youth, that a better future is possible, when there’s no one around to talk about a better past.
The Constitution has been getting shaved down year after year for the last 150 years! Now, instead of a Bill of Rights, we have a List of "Please Mr. Government, we'd really rather you didn't do that to us"!
I remember a story of a guy who had a police camera pointed towards where he parked everyday. He would get numerous speeding tickets because the camera mistook his car for the speeding car and sent him speeding tickets
In my HOA, years ago, they made us all remove our chain linked and privacy fences in order to allow police access quicker "in emergencies".... Shit, we were all conned!
Wait till everyone has their own govt assigned camera drone flying 3 ft above your head monitoring every move you make while the guy watching you has his own camera drone and and the guy two desks over is watching him watch you while he’s being watched
What if a homeowner is prevented from building a privacy wall or privacy fence by municipal codes or HOA rules? If unable to shield your property from public…. Nevermind! You just answered my question! Thanks!
hey, 15:25 ,why isn't the 7th circuit choosing to not recognize the particular theory of gravitation ? I mean, "it's only a theory", right ? if they so decided, then we could fly and float freely instead of having to walk around... Them failing to understand that a "theory" is not a "hypothesis" shouldn't prevent people's rights to be respected. Do these judges have "a reasonable expectation to not being crushed by a falling piano" when they're sunbathing in their backyard ? No, they don't ? How comes ? they SHOULD expect it, or else if a piano was to fall upon them, insurances could claim "they had no expectation of not being crushed by a falling piano"... Why are those judges working so backward...? How about planting cameras to watch the judges 24/7 ? exact same type of cameras, mounted on cars with telescopic poles, recording from a public place... how many affairs and shady things could be found, and how long til they want their peace back ?
What about police listening to cordless telephone calls, taping conversations and distributing the tapes throughout the community - all without a court order for a wiretap. The police take the position that the evidence may not be admissible but it can be used for investigations and to try people in the court of public opinion.
- Is it an unlawful search? No. Anything visible from a public place is fair-game and not subject to expectations of privacy; that's been ruled numerous times (including for Kate Middleton). That said, it IS ABSOLUTELY _HARASSMENT._ If a guy were to park outside a woman's house and watch her for 1.5 YEARS, she could absolutely get a restraining-order against him for harassing her. WTF would it be any different for cops? 🤨 (Also, why did he keep stuff in his house after 1.5 YEARS? 🤦) - 18:11 It's insane that cops are allowed to HACK people's phones, to use Stingrays to do illegal wire-taps. 😠
I'm getting tired of the mass surveillance going on now. My house is surrounded by license plate cameras. So are the paths to work, family, shopping, etc. There should be a warrant to allow capturing specific license data and another to retrieve that data. How is tracking all of my travels constitutional at all?
So basically in short the Plain view doctrine supersedes the Fourth amendment. If I cannot Zoom in with my eyes they shouldn't be able to zoom in with a hidden camera. You must get closer.
Two of the pictures that you show are not pole cameras. One of them is the ubiquitous "Flock LPR Camera" (another huge issue) and the other one was a standard HPS light fixture.Then you show a picture of a what is traditionally called a "pole camera" which is a hand held police camera on the end of a pole that is commonly used to look in windows. Case law in the US has generally held that if you stand in front of an open window and commit a crime, and a reporter is on the sidewalk and he can see you with the naked eye, then he can photograph you . . . so long as he does not use a telephoto lens. I think that is what the crux of the biscuit is here also. The cops have every right to survey the street and your property with the naked eye, or equivalent, but when they get into things like telephoto and thermal, that crosses the line into an illegal search.
I could have answered the question about cameras installed on the street including utility poles. My job was to install traffic cameras for a major city, to report traffic conditions to the public. Of course I had reservations, but found that no one has expectations of privacy on any publicly viewable area. If we did, we would be removing satellite cameras, and aerial photography would be shut down. That is a public issue that has been decided ever since photography was invented. If the police, a public entity decide to put up cameras to monitor any viewable area from a public property or right of way, or fly their plane, drone or helicopter constantly over an area of concern for illegal activity, they can at their leisure and of course at cost to the taxpayer. By the way, traffic cameras have been in operation, monitoring roads and outside of businesses and homes that are within their view since 1998. So, there is legal precedent for long term monitoring looking at the comings and goings of everyone that uses the public rights of way in the area of interest. Each and every case objecting it will lose. Were they to win, a very good use in traffic monitoring and it being made available to the public and press will go away.
There has been cop vans around too many years/decades so Major violation about my private life which I have never had. Keeping me safe? Really? And organized stove which will setin in fire if used (and goes those ones also where they are yelling my name) and causing me losing my home and life since that cop and his wheel man is such a big deal.
I was struck by a scene in the 1967 film about Bonnie and Clyde.. The scene involved a police car stopping Bonnie and Clyde for a tail light, directly after they had robbed a bank and evaded police in town. The acted all polite and and were allowed to go on their way, because the cop didn’t know who they were. My thoughts were regarding the lack of police radios in that time and in that county. Technology is getting cops killed. Add to that the percentage of times when cops get it wrong…wrong addresses to raid, or not understanding the law.. We need to reign this in immediately.
Get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan:
incogni.com/hamptonlaw
They are doing far WORSE than this to ALL of us, now.
The law does not allow for "peeping Toms" to remote view.
@@tedphillips2501 They aren't remote viewing. They are putting the stuff directly in our own body, watching thru our own eyes..
Poll cameras, not to be confused with poll dancers.
So you're telling us the Police don't need a Probable Cause to surveil us on our private property 24/7/365?
Amazing how police will turn cameras on citizens, but freak out, if any citizen, turns a camera in their direction.
Guilty people hate cameras, cops who get riled by a camera legally pointed at them, know they might do something illegal or something else that would get them in trouble if posted on YT and just want a free hand to do and say how they want to, whether it is within the law or not.
How to folks see the pole cams when they're naked to the eye?
@shanemooney6118 Not even close....they just hate to have their criminal, unlawful behavior exposed. The Body-cams worn by police have been the best thing ever, because it has caught their acts on camera and helped get rid of hundreds of the tyrants/Bullies/and thugs.
@shanemooney6118how long did it take for you to destroy your mind. Being a cowardly reprobate repeating your delusions has got to be embarrassing.
WE FOUND THE BOOTLICKER!!!!@shanemooney6118
It never ceases to amaze me that so many Americans still believe that they have freedom while objectively living in a police state.
Right! A basic summary of this video that I got basically supports the corruptness of "justice". There is no actual rules, they just make crap up and do what they want until someone does it to them then they turn around!
Well freedom has rules duh .
@@markgearing here! here!
@@thepurplevelvetIt actually doesn't
@@TshepoKotelo yea it does lol 😂
This is only legal until someone does it to judges and cops then it's illegal.
That's the real Truth!
👍🏾
Exactly ! I was in courtroom and told judge , I was going to record and that I have that right , due to the fact there are cameras recording me during court. Judge , dismissed case !
Judge told me I could request a copy of courtroom video. I said yes , and that evidence ALWAYS gets lost !
There are law societies that have the power to suspend or terminate judges and lawyers. Some society boards are better than others. Theres always the flip side of exposing these corrupt assholes. Remember if the lawyer is corrupt, excessive drinking and drugging etc, they have nasty criminal connections. So have your own righteous gang or a very good plan in place. I live in Canada, Greater Vancouver area in a predominantly brown neighbourhood. Good lawyers get assaulted by the bullies. Some lawyers have formal complaints lodged against them and are either suspended or lose their license to practice law in the courts. I am always respectful to the cops here. Some police have been very good here and some not so much. It is very stressful watching the swat team in action. You know when you have different members from different gangs watching and circling your half decent neighbourhood that something is in the works and to be careful. Be ssfe. Peace love joy. Its time to make our homes back into a garden of art, enlightment oeace joy progress advancement. Look at the beautiful ancient architecture and carvings mosaics pottery paintings etc.
I'm really tired of living in a surveillance state.
Welcome to the future 🤦♀️
@@noellane3808
We need to figure out how this technology works and how we can block it.
For instance I watched another video where they talked about simply putting a sheet of metal between you and the wall penetrating camera with enough to block its view. (I guess we all know why aluminum siding was replaced with vinyl siding. 😏)
I have cameras on my place I watch. You can too
@@kenkneram4819 Reflective Styrofoam insulation can block the view. Just lean a big sheet up against the wall. No need to install it.
Double sides reflective foam insulation might even be better.
Plain sheet metal will slow things down but not stop things if you are sitting still for a while.
Take me back to the payphone days it was a better kinda of life. Technology destroyed mankind as we know it
If people don't yet realize where all this is heading in the not to distant future, you have blinders on.
IKR pretty soon you wont be able to go anywhere in view of the public without being recorded.
Oh wait... That's now.
Like 🇨🇳. Social credit scores. Just wait!!
It’s for are own good! If you don’t believe me, ask the people that use them. Or make them.
But the country is PAYING refugees to come and live here because afterall, this is a great country 🎉❤
I'm sick of searching 😭😅😂
I have a late friend who had a camera-happy neighbor. That neighbor learned how a well-placed mirror reflecting direct sunlight really can negate the function of any camera.
@@michelleslack9985 get a bettter camera do it back ot them ??
@@michelleslack9985 that's called eavesdropping and is against state law.
Lasers work well against cameras too. You can take up a new hobby!
@@orbitingeyes2540 Not all states are 2 party; You only need consent in 2 party states kiddo.
@@dakota9821 ONLY IN PUBLIC. In your home and 'curtilage' (I'll let you look that up) you have a Constitutional and US Supreme Court affirmed right to expectation of privacy.
When the technology becomes so cheap and every pole has an AI camera on it, we'll regret giving so many latitudes to law enforcement.
i already regret it.. I'm in IT, and i dont even know the full extent of what is possible. What i do know however, scares me to death and makes me want to go live with the Amish. I am not joking. You think you have privacy? HAHAHAHAHA. your phone is tracking, listening and knowing everything about you. and you willingly give it away. and that's just the start.
We can take it away from them.
what are you going to think when you come to the realization that any RF can be used as radar, which can create 3D real-time surveillance that penetrates most walls
ie... cell phones and wifi
pro tip: wavelength dictates image resolution
Come to the bay area, it's already here
Exactly!
I used to believe that if you had done nothing wrong , you had nothing to fear from surveillence but in this dystopian era ,wrong is called right and right is called wrong
Yooooooooooooooooo
For some individuals,authorities can literally MAKE UP sh*t about you!!
You don't have to break any laws for the police to arrest you. Guilty until proven innocent.
No. With enough data about you and resources it's possible to manipulate your decisions and life in a very wide range of ways.
Even with a warrant this is still very troubling, not all warrants are in good faith because judges are also corrupt and will recklessly sign off on a warrant.
This.
Just ask Trump.
If someone noticed that a camera is pointing at your house can you put in a privacy fence, then off set a few feet behind it another section of privacy fence with a message that says "f**k the police" on it and place it on two thick pieces of pipe and located on your property in a position that blocks the camera from being able to see over a 6 foot privacy fence with a code lock on the gate. Assuming the private fence doesn't violate any city ordances.?
they literally found drugs bro, dudes a criminal
@@JayPlaysEverything who cares? Government are the main criminals, everyones a criminal
Get on a ladder outside of a judge's house and see if what they assert holds true.
That's because there's laws against that... I know I'm shocked too...
The difference is you'd be doing it just to be an asshole. Police do it to protect people. You're not a crime fighter in any way, shape, or form.
@@-Nickname- Your opinion of police is not based upon reality or even court rulings on the responsibilities of police.
@@-Nickname- If I follow you in traffic for the rest of your life you will eventually screw up and I will be able to give you a ticket, And because of that I will keep following you until I can get something from it.
That's called harassment, That's called stalking, You follow anyone for any period of time and they will eventually do something that could get them in trouble.
blindly putting your faith in something because you think you don't do anything wrong is absolutely absurd. cops are not your friends they are tax collectors they are only there to increase the prison population so that some politician can get richer, they're only there to collect fees for you breaking some traffic law so that's the city purse can get bigger. quit blindly trusting authority.
@@Crazy-Chicken-Media If I screw up, then I deserve that ticket. The key to avoiding tickets is follow the rules and don't screw up. It's not that hard.
Hyperbole. It's not stalking when it's done by law enforcement for the purposes of enforcing the law. Words have specific definitions for a reason. Use them correctly or don't use them at all.
You sound like some kid that was raised by a paranoid conspiracy theorist. It ain't that deep, junior. There may be a few bad apples, but the vast majority are just trying to do their job to protect innocent people.
Meantime, if I have somebody private citizen sitting outside my house, watching me in my family for eighteen months , i'm pretty sure that they would find that that's stalking
they would aproach as "suspecius" and that only shows the hypocris....
Yup, trying walking around on the sidewalk with a camera outside their station ....see what happens
@@StonyBaboon and he would win because of the first amendment. Probably don't be a drug dealer and they won't try to arrest you for dealing drugs.
@@Armany77777 nothing. Or you get to sue for millions.
@@JayPlaysEverything soo many cases dont even show them self cz the person is inocent and dosent even know is being watch... Soo that Logic dosent really work...
Stalking is a crime in every state, without a warrant, the police were stalking this guy.
Gang stalking is becoming a huge deal in America as well!😮
Ain't that part of their service? I mean detectives always could use low-profile methods to gather info.
@@РомаПетров-ж1н How would you like it if a regualr person put on cameras outside your house, and watched and harassed you night and day? Wouldn't you report them for stalking? The police have no more rights than anyone else, they can't break the law either. Yes, they can do temporary surveillance, but they need to go to a judge to present evidence and get a warrant if they want to stalk you, just not have a feeling something is happening.
You may not have a expectation of privacy in the sense that people can see your activity when you leave your house, but NOBODY expects to have all your activities, tracked, documented, and scrutinized and analyzed everytime they leave their house!!!!!! Otherwise, their house is just a builder cage or jail.
Also police: you can't take photos of our public parking lot! That's suspicious!
Yes you can you can take a picture of anything in public just like they can
Law enforcement is spending huge amounts creating a complete surveillance state that can track everyone 24/7 while actual violent criminals get away with brutalizing innocents on a regular basis. Priorities, you know.
Except the surveillance web they weave includes themselves by default without realizing this because so much is put in place by each and every other LE agency.
Yes, it’s called the Sting Ray system. No warrant needed under the “Agreement” signed with the maker, Raytheon and FISA. In the case of the Sting Ray system they spoof multiple cell towers and listen to your phone conversations. Beat down in Funky Town, TX uses this in conjunction with the pole cameras. The case law SCOTUS uses for this needs to be updated. They also use drones over your backyard to help the Code Nazi’s to make obscene amounts of revenue.
@@Nachos-N-Beer too bad they only bother to use that to further cover their wrongdoing and misconduct, and not hold their own accountable
@@MajorReynolds92 We need access to those.. pronto! Let's police the police.. I can write dickets too... not that f'n hard.. won't have to lie either... blue gangbangers are sloppy lawbreakers.
Absolutely they are because they are criminals too.
The video on the pole cameras should be available to everybody since it's not considered private and it's not a search.
👍🏾🎯💯
They'll do what they want and cover it up!
Agree
Stingray tech is a perfect example of them doing that currently
They don't even cover it up anymore. Why should they when the DAs and courts do not hold them accountable??? We had better WTF up and nix this now.
To his guy is not telling you everything b we cause the remedy for this also affects him have challenged him and won't respond
@@marysmith9107so your not willing to study and find remedy
If you see the cameras aimed at your home. Put up flood lights facing the cameras
@doug
Set a camera facing on and focused on the police's pole camera.
A laser beam "accidentally" goes through the lens of the camera then what ??
@@robertgrey6101 what kind of camera would create a invisible laser beam back at the camera???
Mirror reflecting sunlight
@@MrAkaprimetimeA MASER would do it. A camera cannot see Microwave radio radiation. But if the MASER has enough Wattage it will fry the cameras electronics.
I hope no one shoots the lens out of the pole cameras from a hidden place, like from inside their house through an open window.
Any action that is allowed without warrant should be allowed by any private citizen. Stalking much?
It was part of investigation, so the citizen should be an investigator. So that one checks out I guess.
According to Our Gov: Spying, Violence, Lying,Theft, & Corruption of Any Kind is Unacceptable in our Society... Unless the Spying, Violence, Lying, Theft, & Corruption is Perpetrated by the Gov!
Now the president can do anything he wants to. Ain't it grand!?
@@dustyking8851stop watching crap news. Also, take a class on government. A president much be impeached by congress for acts taken while in office. It doesn't make sense that the institution the president resides over is in charge of his prosecution.
@@dustyking8851 Except for Unconstitutional Acts... but you can wipe your azz with the constitution since they Ignore that too.
Pretty much, yeah.
Never thought id be living in 1984s Oceania.
George knew exactly how his fellow leftists operate l, he knew what they woukd do in the future because he was one himself, he understood their thought process and where it woukd lead, and we've been voting them into power for decades.
Also Cops are some of the biggest left wing socalist extremist there are, they just play pretend conservative.
1984 and Animal Farm are their how to guides
Illinois has long had a habit of ignoring individual privacy.
Viewing from the sidewalk at normal human height is not the same as viewing from 15 -25 feet up a pole. I would consider this an invasion of privacy if one has a wood fence around the property.
yes, and anything that is only visible from that height should not be admissible, unless they had A warrant at the time. If A person cannot view it from A sidewalk they should have to get A warrant. Maybe it would be A good idea for such cameras to not be allowed to be greater than 7 feet high.
@@grants7390wait till you hear about these things called satellites.
No kidding. In Cali insurance companies are getting around inspection notification laws by using drones over your property to cancel policies.
Also being watched while not seeing anyone around. People watching from the sidewalk look suspicious after being at the same spot for a while.
Not only that, but this guy also said those cameras zoom can very closely, night vision optics, etc... 😮
If I put up a 20ft fence to guard my privacy, the government will put up a 21ft utility pole, complete with camera.
Not if you eat beans.😊
If it took 18 months, they was grasping at straws.
Remember folks, bb guns and air rifles are not firearms. Glass breaks.
Stay frosty.
IR lights blind digital cameras or wash them out, but are invisible to the human eye. This is the working mechanism of lower end night vision system, and is why video cameras can often give brighter video than what a human can see. A proper security camera setup might have IR spot lights to back up the camera's own lower powered IR lights. Very bright IR lights or somewhat close lights can damage cameras that do not close the auto iris enough. Either way having flashing IR lights tends to cause the camera to chase it's tail opening and closing the iris to adjust the exposure. This can be a problem if you have a flickering IR light source which humans simply can't see to quickly troubleshoot a camera issue.
I won't go so far as to condone your comment at least not publicly even though I can't disagree with it. And I know that some years ago in the area of California called south-central Los Angeles (an area that is host to many the media politely chooses to refer to as "urban youth"), the city attempted to install pole cameras, in order to monitor for the criminal activity that was rampant in the area.
To almost no one's surprise, the cameras received immediate attention from local residents including the aforementioned urban youth, who were less than thrilled at being on camera. The new camera network was only operational for a matter of days. Those cameras that were not totally destroyed, whether by air gun pellets, bullets, flung rocks, or thrown projectiles unknown, were soon rendered unable to monitor the area.
They started making explosive pellets now 😂😂
grasping at straws? He's literally in prison for being a drug dealer.
WERE
As in
Due to loose education and reason standards they incorretcly used "was" in place of "were"
Breaking stereotypes is empowering and trully how you make progress to a better future for all
It'a time for judges that issue these kinds of blatantly anti-citizen rulings to be afraid again.
I wonder what would happen if someone were to place cameras looking over the fences of these "judges" that ruled it's not a violation of privacy and no search was conducted. PEEK-A-BOO!
I work for the largest DOT in the US and I wish I could take you into a certain camera control room. What I can say is that L3 Harris (a military defense contractor) are the contractors that install the cameras and update the software/algorithms periodically. Anyone in a major metropolitan area has seen along the streets and highways those tall poles with a generic looking black box on a gimbal mount up top. The viewing room is staffed with observers 24/7 and you need a security badge to get into those areas.
Great comment. Thank you 🙏
They did it in East Germany and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. What's the difference today in the United States? None.
today ?
I remind you that the United States used to have literal concentration camps where they threw away American citizens who were of Asian descent just for that fact.
or that the Guantanamo base exists so that they can torture people who, being outside the country, no longer have guarantees and constitutional rights, even if they are citizens of the country.
It's not a today thing
i don't think the electronic cameras in east germany were that ubiquitous however, the stasi did manage to make 1/3 of the citizens of the DDR snitch on someone as least once in their lifetime.
Nothing new there.. I had them gangstalking me for four solid years, attempting to set me up and entrap me, covering up crimes commited against me.. yep.. we are no different than the soviet union.
Except the now the technology is totally different as I am electronically harassed and tortured 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
@@pieterwillembotha6719 The phone recordings in East Germany were far WORSE than the cameras today in USA.
The differences are innumerable, both in kind, and in magnitude.
Cameras are set up high on a pole to be able to " see" more than a passerby on the ground and are an intrusive search .
Trespassing is Trespassing! Supreme Court is committing treason for not upholding the US Constitution for WE the people!! Supporting cops over we the people is betrayal of the publics trust! Arrest all judges who fail to support the US Constitution as the Supreme law of the land!
This is truly a prison planet.
More than you even realize.
It’s like George Orwell’s novel on a dystopian dictatorship “1984”
Aluminum foil on the windows
Humanity is at a fork in the path. One way leads to an indefinite Dystopia. The other, to freedom.
My generation, Gen X, is the last whose childhoods and, for many, young adulthood, were pretty free from the surveillance state. Once we’re gone, there won’t be anyone to tell the tale, “Once upon a time in America…” That sort of personal testimony is powerful.
It’s hard to inspire youth, that a better future is possible, when there’s no one around to talk about a better past.
Kind of tired being a prisoner.
One of the problems with the pole cameras that clearly distinguishes them from the general public is that they can view your premises from on high. A fence would be useless against them. If some member of the general public was floating above your sidewalk at 10+ feet or hanging out in a tree on your front lawn spying into your yard and windows, I imagine that person would be breaking a number of laws. Additionally, one does not reasonably expect an individual to do such things. If it were a normal thing, we'd all have tall, visual blocking screens blocking such views into our space.
The problem is, most anywhere you live, you can't put up a fence in your front yard.
I've lived in many cities over my 80 years and there has been nowhere I or my dad before me could not have put up a fence. Stay away from HOAs.
I lived in a city, no HOA, and they still had strict regularions on the size and placement of fences in the front yard. 3' from the sidewalk and I think 5' tall. It was something stupid short for a fence.
Even backyard fences are limited to 6 ft in my area. Everywhere I have lived, front yard fences were limited to two to six feet by the municipality
What are you talking about? 😂
Establish a reasonable expectation of privacy. If possible, comply with the lower fences near the edge of the property for visibility and have an inner fence closer to the house that's 6' or taller. Look up regulations. In some areas a 2' solid trellis on top of a 6' fence is still considered a 6' fence.
Using "pole cameras" to monitor traffic in public places is not the same as pointing those same cameras at an individual's residence, where they have a long codified right to privacy. The 4th amendment is not just about searches and seizures, but guarantees the right of individuals to have "secure in their persons, their identities and their belongings" and have privacy in their own homes, as well as in non-public aspects of lives - if it is not clearly visible, it is "private" by virtue of the fact that a person made an effort to make it private by hiding it from view.
Can I set up cameras to watch the governor's house?
You'll get a good look at his AIPAC guy!
On a public pole. And how is the light pole or telephone pole as used to be called not the property of the Electric company. Does the police have a statement from each electric company to do that?
Only if you live near enough to put the cameras on your property facing his house.
1:55 It was. The second they “looked” inside the house, they lost any possibility of claiming filming public locations.
Big Brother is watching you (us)!
Do you know how much a fence costs? They're putting a damn pay-wall between you and your rights to privacy.
So would it be illegal if a laser accidentally pointed in the camera’s direction? 🤔
...or a $115.00 disposable .22 marlin rifle...
@@brodefineportraiture446 If you can find one.
No that's not illegal. Shooting out you're neighbor's camera is illegal
Or just a powerful white light?
No.
You've been through nothing until you've been followed by a drone for 7 years.
@@jamkajer 😎 U were Stalked by a drone, Myself I was stop at a stop light, noticed a helicopter just shadowing the buildings, the Helo, was a large Herkulese military terms, the lite turned green I moved thru the Intersection, continued down the road the Helo was just above me, I turned into a neighborhood stopped at the first Stop sign🛑. The Helo was over the local grade school, jus in front of me, I pulled out my 35mm camera an took snapshots, the Helo peeled away, left the area, last time that happened!
So now you have to surround your home with a concrete lined steel dome to prevent X-ray vision cameras from all directions and flying drones in order to ensure your privacy. Otherwise, they can watch through the walls and know exactly what style underwear you prefer.
But then we need multiple secret tunnels leading into and out of your home so they can't know exactly who is entering and leaving your home, when, and how often.
I'll bet if I were to set up a pole camera in front of the home of any SCOTUS judge, they would want it removed immediately.
I don't wear underpants anymore.. but when I did I highly suspect they liked slipping into the house while I was away to sniff them.
They allowed intimidation of Scotus , which unlike Congress, is supposed to be protected from that.
Schumer led the charge.
No.... It should be every member of Congress...they supposedly make the Laws
They know what brand of underwear if you used a credit or debit card....
If a camera is mounted on a pole then it sees things anyone walking down the street can't see. My head isn't 18 feet in the air. It's a warrantless search.
Also the fact that this information is being stored, as a person walking by cannot later reproduce video from merely looking at something should factor in to make it search.
GANG STALKING
EXACTLY!!!!!
Been going through this from 2021
Called patriot act started by rino bush
yup.
Agree 😅😅😅😅@@farmerdave7965
One day Incogni will get hacked. It's just a matter of time.
At night put up a spotlight right at their cameras and leave it on as long as the cameras are there.
Use a laser
I wish you’d bring up the subject of Flock Security and the usage of their cameras in public. How they’re used, who they’re connected to, potential for misuse, 4th Amendment concerns, etc. They will certainly be used to do great harm someday.
They already are using them . I bet you !!!!
@@genX68 All over the country.
When the general public is allowed to use public poles to video public areas, then maybe we can have a debate. Law enforcement is over the line as well as other government agencies that have used "other" devises/tech to monitor "suspect" in "public". not to mention they singled out a subject without a warrant or civilian oversight. FOUL on this whole play.
Unfortunately if the camera is put on public property and aimed at private property it's legal. They ran this little scam on me for months and found out something. That me taking a piss and a shit in front of it every night got boring I guess.
That's one way of handling it. Why isn't it considered peeping Tom or sexual perversion?
So you buy an inexpensive pole (like a flag pole or a pole for Purple Martin houses) and erect it on your property as close to the utility pole as you can. On the top of the pole, place a banner or plate sign or whatever to block the camera view of your property.
Well I can't say your reaction was inapropriate! But the thing that surprises me is that they did not just checkmate you and send out a prowl car to arrest you for "public urination" or their usual catch-all, "indecent exposure". I actually know of two guys who were arrested for pissing on a wall at 2 AM coming home from a bar.
Maybe don't break the law in veiw of the public.
There is a world of difference between being able to casually observe the yard of a house and being able to record every second of every day for that yard, plus being able to look into windows from a vantage point that a casual observer never has. Private use of camera and other surveillance technology, including cookies, pixel tags, sale and purchase of financial, medical, and other personal data has become a huge threat to our personal safety as well as our privacy. It is time to put the brakes on all of this as it very rarely solves actual crimes committed against humanity. Solving so called crimes against the state such as violation of bans literally don't count. Most bans should not exist in the first place.
The camera is up a pole.. it's not "seeing what people walking buy would see", unless they're walking on stilts.
So, it's basically considered a high-tech stake out.
I'm no fan of drug manufacturers, but I have to wonder how much manpower and money went into this 18 month long technological surveillance saga in order to get enough evidence to just get a warrant to be allowed to search the home of just one guy.
Can you imagine how much actual good a town can do with that amount of resources?
Never mind 18 months - ten years here! Here in the UK they do that all the time. I must be of massive interest to them. Especially my comings and goings... like, I don't know, given that I'm severely disabled, medical staff, nurses, ambulances, then there's the grocery deliveries, pharmacy deliveries... meanwhile there's thousands starving but that's where tax payer's money goes...
I would argue that the camera is inciting civil disobedience. It may be legal, but in the older laws of manners that span the globe, staring (electronically included) is rude and disturbing.
Time to take matters in our own hands
Pole camers are mostly within city limits.
That is 1 reason I do not live within the city limits of any town.
The closest town is 18 miles away from my house. Where I live all the roads are Farm to Market Roads & County Roads. Out where the streets have NO NAMES.
Last I checked those poles belong to the utility company and are private property. Without even watching past 1:08 I can tell you this is illegal as all heck.
Public view necessitates being on *public* property; If I'm not allowed to climb on top of them and sit there 24/7 neither are the cameras.
Yep
Thank you for posting this video! I live in Phoenix Az. We have been fighting to try to get the City of Phoenix to stop violating our privacy rights for years now. They don't use pole cameras (yet), that I know of, but they do go down the alleys behind our homes & climb up ladders & stand on trucks to look over EVERYONE'S 6ft+ block fences into our yards "Looking for violations" several times a month. They have also made it a "violation" to put up taller fences without getting special (& costly) "variance permits" & , sadly, growing privacy vegetation takes many years, to be even partially effective, & is not affordable by many ppl. in our neighborhood. Any ideas, aside from these, as to how we might stop their violations of our privacy?
They did this to me! It’s so messed up. I never was involved in a crime so nothing happened. But I was harassed, followed, and tracked by police/fraternal club. I put in a bid to run for city council cause I wanted to help my community. I’m not in the good ole boy club so when I put in my bid I was immediately gang stalked by my municipality.
I believe you. Community gangstalking is everywhere in Texas
The general public can't/won't stand in my backyard for months without sleep and also have a photographic memory 😅
Here in Australia, my local hotel has live video streaming straight to the police station. In fact, the whole town is under constant scrutiny with many cameras on many corners.
In Britain some departments of the law are actively using cameras that can penetrate two concrete walls easily and now have a system of eye tracking you through walls (most likely using 3D representation of the room you're in to calculate what you are looking at in your home), and are actively using this technology for more than a decade on certain individuals!
These technologies and how these agencies are increasingly abusing them, is getting out of hand, but what are we to do when there are people who are willing to go along with the laws being broken in such ways and staying silent once they are payed?
I know, I'm in the UK. They are not even trying to hide it because they assume that I'm of low intelligence and don't understand what they are doing. Got the van outside my house as we speak... since August 2014 it's been going on. Vans since November 2023.
@@LittleKitty22 If you're not a cop. I'll tell you, if they really wanted to they would set up shop in a room adjacent to you and set their equipment. It takes only a few hours to set up all of their equipment!
If you're right, and not mentally ill or delusion, good luck mate, you're a bit screwed in todays society!
Plus, it's probably a matter of time before they come busting through your door too (they want your ass and won't mind setting you up to get it)!
@@LittleKitty22I've got one following me on the Wi-Fi it is named "FBI van on corner"
What departments exactly?
@@LittleKitty22@LittleKitty22, why is this going on?
Nice camera you have there. Be a shame if it had an accident…🙄
Blade Runner in UK is my hero!
My thoughts exactly !
Wouldn't that be considered harassment?
I also think there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in an unfenced yard too, and cameras recording and storing info 24 hours a day is just weird. Theres a big difference in someone observing me by driving by but knowing I'm on camera 24 hours a day I wouldnt feel comfortable ever going in my own yard.
private citizens should also make effort that there personal surveillance is not constantly filming neighbors and focusing only on ones own property
@@gfy2979yea tell my nosy neighbors that, got cams fixed on my front and back entrance, when I'm bringing out many bags of trash I can hear there phone notifications going off multiple times lol but I feel uneasy about being watched all the time.
@@gfy2979their
There is no expectation of privacy for anything that can be seen from a public vantage point. This is the same argument that 1st Amendment auditors use on government and public offices. Want to sit outside of a power utility station and record the comings and goings, no problem. As long as you are on public property, there is nothing they can do.
I don't see an issue here either. As long as the police are authorized to use such devices, its no different than an individual sitting outside your home, ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, watching. You may not like it, but there is no law against it.
And be careful about pushing for a law to stop this behavior. It can be used against you or those that use public property to monitor and record unlawful police and other government personnel. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Feel free to think that, it is not based in logic or reason though. If you are visible from public eye, you have no lawful expectation of privacy from it's view. Say for example you have a fence and the police mount a camera high enough that it can observe areas ordinarially obscured to the public walking by, THEN you have a reasonable claim against that camera.
Cops have to much leniency now. To much power. It will never stop. Back to a total police state.
Trump wants to give them federal immunity.
This is a clear invasion of privacy
A CAMERA IS A PERPETUAL SEARCH, it is tireless, endless and can spy at great distances without ceasing
ANY use of ANY camera should always require a warrant
It should be was the video accidental or was it targeted. I think it should be a search if a suspect is targeted. "suspect" implies they have articulable reason to justify the observations and thus they should be required to get warrant.
The cops use thermal imaging all the time. This is why lead paint was banned years ago. The military was developing thermal imaging 45+ years ago and lead paint blocked quite a bit of the ability.
It would be easy to make heavy lead paint, just like copper power put into paint
Were you thinking paintball? @paulcerny3805
You can still buy lead lined dry wall. It is made to protect sensitive computer systems from magnetic fields around electrical panels.
But if the public does this, it’s against bylaws, and invasion of privacy. WTF?!
Funny how many videos I have seen where police officers get upset when someone films them on public property.
They are using the wrong s word. They stalked this man
The country is going to be shocked when they find out that the college murders in Idaho were voice recorded by a camera outside on a telephone pole camera that belonged to the city. It happened at a college sorority. What business did that city have micing up those pole cameras?
Humanity is at a fork in the path. One way leads to an indefinite Dystopia. The other, to freedom.
My generation, Gen X, is the last whose childhoods and, for many, young adulthood, were pretty free from the surveillance state. Once we’re gone, there won’t be anyone to tell the tale, “Once upon a time in America…” That sort of personal testimony is powerful.
It’s hard to inspire youth, that a better future is possible, when there’s no one around to talk about a better past.
The Constitution has been getting shaved down year after year for the last 150 years!
Now, instead of a Bill of Rights, we have a List of "Please Mr. Government, we'd really rather you didn't do that to us"!
I remember a story of a guy who had a police camera pointed towards where he parked everyday. He would get numerous speeding tickets because the camera mistook his car for the speeding car and sent him speeding tickets
In my HOA, years ago, they made us all remove our chain linked and privacy fences in order to allow police access quicker "in emergencies".... Shit, we were all conned!
Wait till everyone has their own govt assigned camera drone flying 3 ft above your head monitoring every move you make while the guy watching you has his own camera drone and and the guy two desks over is watching him watch you while he’s being watched
Get some of the reflective skateboarding tape. It doesn't obscure the license plate from a cop behind you, but the cameras can't see it 😅
Stingray every time I see a speed trap radar trailer I think of the stingray and pole cameras.
What if a homeowner is prevented from building a privacy wall or privacy fence by municipal codes or HOA rules? If unable to shield your property from public…. Nevermind! You just answered my question! Thanks!
hey, 15:25 ,why isn't the 7th circuit choosing to not recognize the particular theory of gravitation ? I mean, "it's only a theory", right ? if they so decided, then we could fly and float freely instead of having to walk around...
Them failing to understand that a "theory" is not a "hypothesis" shouldn't prevent people's rights to be respected.
Do these judges have "a reasonable expectation to not being crushed by a falling piano" when they're sunbathing in their backyard ? No, they don't ? How comes ?
they SHOULD expect it, or else if a piano was to fall upon them, insurances could claim "they had no expectation of not being crushed by a falling piano"...
Why are those judges working so backward...?
How about planting cameras to watch the judges 24/7 ? exact same type of cameras, mounted on cars with telescopic poles, recording from a public place... how many affairs and shady things could be found, and how long til they want their peace back ?
Thanks!
Appreciate this support and you taking the time to watch!
What about police listening to cordless telephone calls, taping conversations and distributing the tapes throughout the community - all without a court order for a wiretap. The police take the position that the evidence may not be admissible but it can be used for investigations and to try people in the court of public opinion.
Well it literally isn't a "wiretap"
@@LegDayLasDo you agree with this practice?
- Is it an unlawful search? No. Anything visible from a public place is fair-game and not subject to expectations of privacy; that's been ruled numerous times (including for Kate Middleton). That said, it IS ABSOLUTELY _HARASSMENT._ If a guy were to park outside a woman's house and watch her for 1.5 YEARS, she could absolutely get a restraining-order against him for harassing her. WTF would it be any different for cops? 🤨 (Also, why did he keep stuff in his house after 1.5 YEARS? 🤦)
- 18:11 It's insane that cops are allowed to HACK people's phones, to use Stingrays to do illegal wire-taps. 😠
I'm getting tired of the mass surveillance going on now. My house is surrounded by license plate cameras. So are the paths to work, family, shopping, etc. There should be a warrant to allow capturing specific license data and another to retrieve that data. How is tracking all of my travels constitutional at all?
I love how only homeowners get the luxury of expected privacy
This whole issue would seem to question whether Prohibition has any Constitutional legitimacy.
So the government is allowed to monitor any specific person or property without a warrant?
Invasion of privacy without legal warrant from a judge !...
So basically in short the Plain view doctrine supersedes the Fourth amendment. If I cannot Zoom in with my eyes they shouldn't be able to zoom in with a hidden camera. You must get closer.
Big brother is watching you. This has been going on for years.
If I were a juror, I would find the person not guilty because of the blatant disregard for the constitution.
Two of the pictures that you show are not pole cameras. One of them is the ubiquitous "Flock LPR Camera" (another huge issue) and the other one was a standard HPS light fixture.Then you show a picture of a what is traditionally called a "pole camera" which is a hand held police camera on the end of a pole that is commonly used to look in windows. Case law in the US has generally held that if you stand in front of an open window and commit a crime, and a reporter is on the sidewalk and he can see you with the naked eye, then he can photograph you . . . so long as he does not use a telephoto lens. I think that is what the crux of the biscuit is here also. The cops have every right to survey the street and your property with the naked eye, or equivalent, but when they get into things like telephoto and thermal, that crosses the line into an illegal search.
I could have answered the question about cameras installed on the street including utility poles. My job was to install traffic cameras for a major city, to report traffic conditions to the public. Of course I had reservations, but found that no one has expectations of privacy on any publicly viewable area. If we did, we would be removing satellite cameras, and aerial photography would be shut down. That is a public issue that has been decided ever since photography was invented.
If the police, a public entity decide to put up cameras to monitor any viewable area from a public property or right of way, or fly their plane, drone or helicopter constantly over an area of concern for illegal activity, they can at their leisure and of course at cost to the taxpayer. By the way, traffic cameras have been in operation, monitoring roads and outside of businesses and homes that are within their view since 1998. So, there is legal precedent for long term monitoring looking at the comings and goings of everyone that uses the public rights of way in the area of interest. Each and every case objecting it will lose. Were they to win, a very good use in traffic monitoring and it being made available to the public and press will go away.
abuse of authority.
There has been cop vans around too many years/decades so Major violation about my private life which I have never had. Keeping me safe? Really? And organized stove which will setin in fire if used (and goes those ones also where they are yelling my name) and causing me losing my home and life since that cop and his wheel man is such a big deal.
I was struck by a scene in the 1967 film about Bonnie and Clyde..
The scene involved a police car stopping Bonnie and Clyde for a tail light, directly after they had robbed a bank and evaded police in town. The acted all polite and and were allowed to go on their way, because the cop didn’t know who they were.
My thoughts were regarding the lack of police radios in that time and in that county. Technology is getting cops killed.
Add to that the percentage of times when cops get it wrong…wrong addresses to raid, or not understanding the law..
We need to reign this in immediately.
That was a slick ad slide in stop it. Was taking it serious until I figured out you were throwing an ad.