Cause he's half full of it...not all, but he glosses over quite a bit that Dulles did great for the country, the man was definitely not a Saint though, but not an evil man as his book shows, Soviet propaganda...well he gives a pass to many dangerous characters or down plays their deeds, Che for instance and Castro. Castro was going to launch nuclear missiles at the US, thank God the Russians had the key. He's a partisan hack period.
It is way past time the CIA comes clean about the Kennedy assassination. David Talbot's research should be taught in history classes throughout the country.
Ya.... If it were bipartisan. Lauds Clinton but doesn't speak about the Clinton murders? Talks about Bush but not Obama use of NSA and wiretapping friendly governments? Hugely irresponsible lack of journalistic integrity. I'm disappointed.
Theres still people alive likely involved with it today. They need to make sure they all pass away so whatever story they create can somehow have them being the good guys. To be honest, if they told the truth. Most people would demand real change in the government. This is something they cannot have, as you work for them. They don't work for you. They need to keep up the illusion making you think your candidates work for you and not more powerful people who secretly run the country.
Congratulations to David for his hard work. The book is in point especially prior to 1960. I will strongly recommend his work to my international colleagues. Further more, If you liked to suggest last second in Dallas from Dr. Joshua Thompson. Both of Dr. Thompson and David are complementary. Congratulations to David Talbot, again great delivery!
David Talbot is a great writer. They're like ''Think'' Books. To me it was like, I'm gonna research that & before I knew it, I'd learn something I didn't know... Thanks for Posting This Interview...
Final remark in this video: "We didn't crush the Nazi regime (as FDR wanted to) as much as we (re)purposed it". Symbolism being a reflection of reality, we can say that the spirit of the German/Nazi Eagle on their flag shifted to America after WW2 and became "resident evil", as the Great American Seal very clearly shows.
I've been happening similar thoughts to this recently after studying our history & looking at the world around us today. I thought to myself, "Hitler died, but facism didn't lose WW2... it shed its skin & took on a new life in the U.S." Talbot -- whose book I would love to read -- seems to echo these impressions (and can add TONS more evidence & documentation than I ever could).
The irony that any proponent of democracy could believe that democracy is too important to trust to the people is so painful it hurts just to think about it.
Also, as a side note I'm reading a book called "The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People," that confirms a lot of these stories from additional sources. It also explains how the government legally spies on its citizens without a warrant. Basically, the 4th Amendment only applies to US citizens. Our spies are allowed to spy on non-US citizens to their heart's content. UK citizens are protected by UK laws, but US citizens are not protected under those laws. Basically, UK agents spy on US citizens and then give those reports to US agents. In return, US agents spy on UK agents and then give UK agents those reports. There is a certain genius to this plan. Honestly, if any of these cases went to court, chances are the practices would still be ruled unconstitutional, so government agents work overtime making sure none of these cases make it to court from what I have heard.
Except, of course, that the people to whom he ascribes the desire to be proponents of democracy were nothing like it. Using the word democracy does not indicate a genuine belief in it. The idea that the Dulles brothers were even remotely interested in democracy is clearly bases on nothing. Given what Talbot knows of these people, I find that very difficult to reconcile. I don't have the answers, of course.
@@staninjapan07 Oh, I don’t for a second believe the Dulles brothers were ever genuinely interested in democracy, and I certainly don’t believe that just because someone pays lip service to democracy that it automatically means they believe in it. But there’s something extra painful about the concept of trying to argue that democracy is too important to trust to the people. How could anyone ever have even come up with that sentence? I’m trying to think of an equally moronic sentence to say, but I’m really struggling to come up with something because it is in a class of its own. Maybe choice is too precious for me to let you decide if you want to have it? Anyone who says the believe democracy is too important to trust to the people just in speaking that sentence has proven they a) don’t even understand democracy, and b) don’t believe in democracy. It is such a revealing statement, I can only think it would be made by either an extreme idiot or by someone who thinks their listener is an extreme idiot.
@@staninjapan07 That has to be one of the most polite, genuine, intelligent, humble responses I have seen on UA-cam. I’m very impressed. Thanks. And for the record, I think your original comment still added value and was spot on whether or not you perfectly understood my original point.
The Devil's Chessboard is one of those books you are poorer not to have read. For anyone who still thinks they can trust government, this is the one and only book you need to read.
So, why was Q & A cut off, just as Talbot was talking about the significance of the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act passed late in the Clinton administration?
I think it cuts off for technical reasons. Prior to cut off it pretty much summarizes what it means, where Nazi Germany is just transformed by the hand of the US into West Germany.
Who did Project Paperclip with Dulles ..? The man to his left in the picture with all the Scientists ..? The guy with the dog in his coat and Wingwalker boots ..?
The interviewer never really gave David Talbot a chance to talk. The interviewer liked to ask 20 minute questions. I can appreciate his knowledge but I really wanted to hear more from Talbot.
Its like he almost took offense at talbot "speaking for too long"...his smug and somewhat self-indulgent posturing did detract from what was otherwise an outstanding interview..But kudos to both of them, well worth watching.
Normally, I'd agree. However, the time allotted in this interview was short and brief, and to bring out the massive coverage of Dulles's activities during his CIA career, plus the fact he, and his brother, John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State in Eisenhower's Administration, were attornies of Wall Street's Law firm Sullivan and Cromwell, is noted too and to that degree. That in itself, opens the door to speculation and further study, plus, can be a source of argument as a conflict of interest due to the Dulles brother's power within government institutions, thus required the host to guide Mr. Talbott through the maze to highlight much of Talbott's expose' in his work. Personally, I felt the host was not embellishing his credentials as an effort to elevate his stature over Talbott per se,' but to use his talent, based on what of Mr. Talbott's discoveries and investigation, to embellish Talbott's work. So much was, and is, needed to be conveyed to a public audience (public jury) to explore government intrusions based on a somewhat fascist arrangement with Wall Street. The legal questions should be discussed accordingly after the facts are presented to get a better analysis of the academic prowess of Talbott's nature, and he knew so much needed to be addressed under the strict time of the interview. I've gotten Mr. Talbott's book, "The Devil's Chessboard" and it is exceptional with facts gleaned and presented in such a fine manner. That is why Mr. Talbott's expose is considered outstanding among his peers and critical thinking members of society. But, I understand your frustration.
@@TManningSirenSong25 True, we already know about Guatemala, I'm sure the audience would want to hear more about Dulles killing JFK and the Dulles Nazi connections.
Another thought; so Kennedy was a young man surrounded by these old cronies who were in on who is really running things and it was a foregone conclusion in their minds that Kennedy would acquiesce to their direction, real talk they would bully him if needed. When the “missiles of October” went down, Taylor et al wanted to do a preemptive strike on the Soviet Union. Kennedy had to pull together all fibers of clear thinking, morality, and courage to go against the men who felt their lifetime occupation was to defend the US. I don’t think Nixon would have held up against them. If left to our military leaders the world would have imploded, so thank goodness, though alone on an island, Kennedy had the guts to follow his keen thinking and instincts.
You dont know Nixon he wanted to use nuclear weapons on north Vietnamese but people had to keep telling him thats to far mr president its crazy we cant do that and Nixon would just laugh figuring out other ways to kill thousands of people by blowing up the dikes to drown people.
Thank you again Mr. Talbot for your research and revelations and your courage. Yes, courage, because your reporting shakes the foundation and pillars of the majority of most Americans. While most Americans don’t believe Oswald was the lone assassin or the assassin at all, I don’t think they are aware that in the 50’s who was running foreign policy, economic policy and financial markets. Americans would not want to believe that Jack Kennedy was surrounded by agency heads CIA, FBI, the State Department, at least two of the four Joint Chiefs, who were insubordinate and establishing their agendas. Averill Harriman should have been executed before the Rosenberg, but no American would know of his action. They would only know of him and his swanky wife from the Style section of the Washington Post. When Kennedy didn’t provide what the CIA wanted at the Bay of Pigs it set their hair on fire. And when he denied the same hawks a military attack on Cuba during that crisis, and his speech at American U, those events sealed his fate; but who believe, i bet JFK wouldn’t have even believed his fellow Americans no matter how ideologically opposed would murder one of their own. He was wise enough to know that he had to conduct diplomacy in a clandestine manner. I can’t imagine being the President and you literally cannot trust anyone in all these crucial arenas. The ironic thing about the CIA, they were inept at what they were suppose to be doing. The Soviet’s and East Germans ran circles around them. But the CIA was very accomplished in subverting the American government and many nations attempting self government after years of empirical rule..that’s all for me. Sorry to bend your ear.
Heeeeyyyy this library is where I worked my 2nd job at 16 years old then I joined the US AIR FORCE AT 19 years and retired at 39 years old DAMMIT LIFE FLASHED BEFORE MY EYES! Thank you for the memories!!😢😢😢
"CHE LVES!" [I wrote that on the walls in the US Navy in Puerto Rico, 1968-'69. They made me sand it off. I also used a cutting torch, cut out a peace symbol out of a barrel lid, painted it white and got this younger guy to climb the pole that had the PA sysyem speaker and hang it over the speaker. Days later, the battalion Exec Officer came over there with a PO1 and they took it down with wire cutters.] You had to be there. M
Also, there were two Oswalds and also, the Mossad of Israel were involved in getting snipers from the Corsican Mafia in position in Dealey Plaza, a scheme that was largely the work of Bill Harvey, Angleton's associate at CIA. After the assassination, Israel was able to keep American support AND build nuclear weapons. They were going to build nuclear weapons anyway, but killing Kennedy meant that they, Israel, were able to complete their development of nuclear weapons and also keep American support. The Israelis were convinced that Kennedy was going to send in paratroopers to take over and shut down the Dimona Nuclear Reactor Facility in the Negev Desert. Not kidding. M
@@MMorMM I well understand this and the USA is in a sad state of affairs."Powers that Be," control,dictate "what occurs" in the USA and other countries controlled by them.
Its mind boggling how much the US owe to Europe and the Middle East. In Greece. My family always said. Imagine how peaceful the world could have been without the Americans. All the millions and millions and millions of lives that could of been Saved if the USA didn't exist.
Yes and no. Use the science of physics to ascertain that what will be will be and que sera sera but as much as we tried to help, we got demons too. So im sorry. I am a victim of america and even mexico, even stupid amsterdam honestly but as long as computers exist u will have “god as a computer” aka the cia which is actually global and tries to mitigate bombing random people but is more specific
Also. Islamic extremism and the British government go back a long way. I recommend the new edition of the historian Mark Curtis book Secret Affairs: Britain's Collusion with Radical Islam and terrorist groups since the 1940s. It will tell you what the news doesn't.
What the hell was that part about Dulles looking at his victims' faces as he snapped their necks?!! Wtf?! I know Dulles had countless people killed, but did he actually kill people himself?!! And did he talk about it to his mistress?!!
So is this guy a communist? I’m a bit confused? If communism was so good why did my family in Poland who owned their own large farm get it taken away in Poland and went hungry as they were not allowed to eat what they grew? I’m confused as to this man’s bias?
Idk why did america take nationalized land from Guatemalan farmers in 1953? America and the soviets both did terrible things you ever use your brain and realize you dont have to support neither america or the soviets because we both commited crimes
When was your family’s “large farm” taken away? Was your family farm over 50 hectares? How did your family secure such large holdings? Was your family affiliated with Polish fascists or where they German? Did your family’s holdings include forest land? Do you think that land should be concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy people whose source of wealth are dubious? Do you think that an oligarchy is a sign of a healthy society and that it shouldn’t be totally destroyed where ever it occurs in order that ultimate power rests with the people rather than a few greedy oligarchs? Answers to these questions would help me provide some guidance to you.
@@platosbeard4449 My great-grandmother’s farm was also taken away in Eastern Ukraine in the early 1930s. Are you suggesting that owing land is a sign of being an oligarch? Also, how low could you, communists, stoop by indirectly suggesting the OP’s family affiliated itself with the Nazis?
@@МаксимЛяшко-и3ъ could have been a Kulak and a counter revolutionary. But all land rests with the state on behalf of the public/community. Did your great grand mother create an iota of sand in order to lay claim to land? What gives people the right to seize land from the commons and lay claim to it as their private property? Aside from your home which is personal space, why should anyone own land separate from the commons? How did your great grand mother get the land in the first place (I assume you’re talking about a large farm here)? You’ll probably find out that it was seized in the first instance by landlords from the public space. It may have been sold on in pieces subsequently but this does not obviate the initial crime.
Davie Davie Davie Talbot I am new to DT and I am tracking and appreciating the illumination into Dispicable Dulles.................and then the wheels fell off. DT is a member of the very group he criticizes. His excuruation of the Occupy movement's organic response to Wall St's s..tty character and then blunders forward and defamed Ed Snowden's contributions. Uhhhhh.......so how is DT not an establishment acolyte?
you know this man is telling the truth because it's so difficult to find interviews of him
Cause he's half full of it...not all, but he glosses over quite a bit that Dulles did great for the country, the man was definitely not a Saint though, but not an evil man as his book shows, Soviet propaganda...well he gives a pass to many dangerous characters or down plays their deeds, Che for instance and Castro. Castro was going to launch nuclear missiles at the US, thank God the Russians had the key. He's a partisan hack period.
they're all over the internet
It is way past time the CIA comes clean about the Kennedy assassination. David Talbot's research should be taught in history classes throughout the country.
Ya.... If it were bipartisan. Lauds Clinton but doesn't speak about the Clinton murders? Talks about Bush but not Obama use of NSA and wiretapping friendly governments? Hugely irresponsible lack of journalistic integrity. I'm disappointed.
Nothing is new under the sun, a small circle of people must maintain ultimate authority, beyond your imagination
Theres still people alive likely involved with it today. They need to make sure they all pass away so whatever story they create can somehow have them being the good guys. To be honest, if they told the truth. Most people would demand real change in the government. This is something they cannot have, as you work for them. They don't work for you. They need to keep up the illusion making you think your candidates work for you and not more powerful people who secretly run the country.
Congratulations to David for his hard work. The book is in point especially prior to 1960. I will strongly recommend his work to my international colleagues. Further more, If you liked to suggest last second in Dallas from Dr. Joshua Thompson. Both of Dr. Thompson and David are complementary. Congratulations to David Talbot, again great delivery!
David Talbot is a great writer. They're like ''Think'' Books. To me it was like, I'm gonna research that & before I knew it, I'd learn something I didn't know... Thanks for Posting This Interview...
Great interview; Talbot knows his stuff, the research is just about impeccable. Read him please.
Good propaganda.
Good propaganda.
I'm reading The Devils Chessboard at the moment. It's pretty dark stuff. Compelling and well- sourced.
@@notsocrates9529propaganda for who? propaganda for what?
@@greenvelvet I am not here to spoon feed you information that I spent years reading and looking into. Figure it out, or don't.
his books are awesome....
Final remark in this video: "We didn't crush the Nazi regime (as FDR wanted to) as much as we (re)purposed it". Symbolism being a reflection of reality, we can say that the spirit of the German/Nazi Eagle on their flag shifted to America after WW2 and became "resident evil", as the Great American Seal very clearly shows.
I've been happening similar thoughts to this recently after studying our history & looking at the world around us today. I thought to myself, "Hitler died, but facism didn't lose WW2... it shed its skin & took on a new life in the U.S." Talbot -- whose book I would love to read -- seems to echo these impressions (and can add TONS more evidence & documentation than I ever could).
Medical Aparthied and the last 2 years of western decolonization proove you to be right.
ua-cam.com/video/x9Vn8_wYAwQ/v-deo.html
@@jasondelvaux3036 anti fascism is an American ideal. The FBI and others refuse to investigate antifa because of this.
Absolutely. We took their scientists and became them.
The irony that any proponent of democracy could believe that democracy is too important to trust to the people is so painful it hurts just to think about it.
Also, as a side note I'm reading a book called "The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People," that confirms a lot of these stories from additional sources. It also explains how the government legally spies on its citizens without a warrant. Basically, the 4th Amendment only applies to US citizens. Our spies are allowed to spy on non-US citizens to their heart's content. UK citizens are protected by UK laws, but US citizens are not protected under those laws. Basically, UK agents spy on US citizens and then give those reports to US agents. In return, US agents spy on UK agents and then give UK agents those reports. There is a certain genius to this plan. Honestly, if any of these cases went to court, chances are the practices would still be ruled unconstitutional, so government agents work overtime making sure none of these cases make it to court from what I have heard.
Except, of course, that the people to whom he ascribes the desire to be proponents of democracy were nothing like it.
Using the word democracy does not indicate a genuine belief in it.
The idea that the Dulles brothers were even remotely interested in democracy is clearly bases on nothing.
Given what Talbot knows of these people, I find that very difficult to reconcile.
I don't have the answers, of course.
@@staninjapan07 Oh, I don’t for a second believe the Dulles brothers were ever genuinely interested in democracy, and I certainly don’t believe that just because someone pays lip service to democracy that it automatically means they believe in it. But there’s something extra painful about the concept of trying to argue that democracy is too important to trust to the people. How could anyone ever have even come up with that sentence? I’m trying to think of an equally moronic sentence to say, but I’m really struggling to come up with something because it is in a class of its own. Maybe choice is too precious for me to let you decide if you want to have it? Anyone who says the believe democracy is too important to trust to the people just in speaking that sentence has proven they a) don’t even understand democracy, and b) don’t believe in democracy. It is such a revealing statement, I can only think it would be made by either an extreme idiot or by someone who thinks their listener is an extreme idiot.
@@hollybigelow5337 I clearly missed your point. Sorry about that.
@@staninjapan07 That has to be one of the most polite, genuine, intelligent, humble responses I have seen on UA-cam. I’m very impressed. Thanks. And for the record, I think your original comment still added value and was spot on whether or not you perfectly understood my original point.
Book Brothers is magnificent got it on audible lovely book listened twice
How is it different from this?
The Devil's Chessboard is one of those books you are poorer not to have read. For anyone who still thinks they can trust government, this is the one and only book you need to read.
😂😂
anyone who still thinks they can trust government, is too far gone to learn to read
So, why was Q & A cut off, just as Talbot was talking about the significance of the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act passed late in the Clinton administration?
I commented but then realized what you were talking about. For other viewers: 52:52
I think it cuts off for technical reasons. Prior to cut off it pretty much summarizes what it means, where Nazi Germany is just transformed by the hand of the US into West Germany.
in the middle of the devil's chessboard....if even a fraction of these events are true then morality is just something you scrap off your shoe.
Look into Studley Butler and the business plot.
@@kiddeath96 Smedley Butler "War is a Racket" can listen to it here on You Tube. Changed my whole perspective on war.
@@kiddeath96 Smedley Butler's"War is a Racket," General Butler was a Genuine Military HERO🇺🇲🇺🇲
@@NancySanders-om4ic indeed
@@kiddeath96 Thank You.
I have always wondered how Oswald got back in the States so easily after "Defecting" to the USSR? Wasn't that a huge red flag in the early 60s?
Can't wait to read this one.
Totally fascinating. Very informative. Gripping.
I love this book! Cant recommend it enough!
My name is Warren David Talbot so i know this is a smart guy .
Who did Project Paperclip with Dulles ..? The man to his left in the picture with all the Scientists ..? The guy with the dog in his coat and Wingwalker boots ..?
The interviewer never really gave David Talbot a chance to talk. The interviewer liked to ask 20 minute questions. I can appreciate his knowledge but I really wanted to hear more from Talbot.
Its like he almost took offense at talbot "speaking for too long"...his smug and somewhat self-indulgent posturing did detract from what was otherwise an outstanding interview..But kudos to both of them, well worth watching.
The interviewer steered the conversation into the most uninteresting alleyway, total waste of the guest's and viewer's time.
Normally, I'd agree. However, the time allotted in this interview was short and brief, and to bring out the massive coverage of Dulles's activities during his CIA career, plus the fact he, and his brother, John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State in Eisenhower's Administration, were attornies of Wall Street's Law firm Sullivan and Cromwell, is noted too and to that degree. That in itself, opens the door to speculation and further study, plus, can be a source of argument as a conflict of interest due to the Dulles brother's power within government institutions, thus required the host to guide Mr. Talbott through the maze to highlight much of Talbott's expose' in his work. Personally, I felt the host was not embellishing his credentials as an effort to elevate his stature over Talbott per se,' but to use his talent, based on what of Mr. Talbott's discoveries and investigation, to embellish Talbott's work. So much was, and is, needed to be conveyed to a public audience (public jury) to explore government intrusions based on a somewhat fascist arrangement with Wall Street. The legal questions should be discussed accordingly after the facts are presented to get a better analysis of the academic prowess of Talbott's nature, and he knew so much needed to be addressed under the strict time of the interview. I've gotten Mr. Talbott's book, "The Devil's Chessboard" and it is exceptional with facts gleaned and presented in such a fine manner. That is why Mr. Talbott's expose is considered outstanding among his peers and critical thinking members of society. But, I understand your frustration.
Interviewer’s commentary and interventions were very helpful and complementary to David’s encyclopedic knowledge.
@@TManningSirenSong25 True, we already know about Guatemala, I'm sure the audience would want to hear more about Dulles killing JFK and the Dulles Nazi connections.
Classic Interviewer... Central Casting.
seriously, like he's been printed by a 3d printer, bloody good though
Honestly can’t believe UA-cam allows this video.
I'd love to know Talbot's thoughts on Epstein. Media has conveniently swept that under the rug.
Amazing
Oddly, this book was recommended by Q
Another thought; so Kennedy was a young man surrounded by these old cronies who were in on who is really running things and it was a foregone conclusion in their minds that Kennedy would acquiesce to their direction, real talk they would bully him if needed. When the “missiles of October” went down, Taylor et al wanted to do a preemptive strike on the Soviet Union. Kennedy had to pull together all fibers of clear thinking, morality, and courage to go against the men who felt their lifetime occupation was to defend the US. I don’t think Nixon would have held up against them. If left to our military leaders the world would have imploded, so thank goodness, though alone on an island, Kennedy had the guts to follow his keen thinking and instincts.
You dont know Nixon he wanted to use nuclear weapons on north Vietnamese but people had to keep telling him thats to far mr president its crazy we cant do that and Nixon would just laugh figuring out other ways to kill thousands of people by blowing up the dikes to drown people.
Thank you again Mr. Talbot for your research and revelations and your courage. Yes, courage, because your reporting shakes the foundation and pillars of the majority of most Americans. While most Americans don’t believe Oswald was the lone assassin or the assassin at all, I don’t think they are aware that in the 50’s who was running foreign policy, economic policy and financial markets. Americans would not want to believe that Jack Kennedy was surrounded by agency heads CIA, FBI, the State Department, at least two of the four Joint Chiefs, who were insubordinate and establishing their agendas. Averill Harriman should have been executed before the Rosenberg, but no American would know of his action. They would only know of him and his swanky wife from the Style section of the Washington Post. When Kennedy didn’t provide what the CIA wanted at the Bay of Pigs it set their hair on fire. And when he denied the same hawks a military attack on Cuba during that crisis, and his speech at American U, those events sealed his fate; but who believe, i bet JFK wouldn’t have even believed his fellow Americans no matter how ideologically opposed would murder one of their own. He was wise enough to know that he had to conduct diplomacy in a clandestine manner. I can’t imagine being the President and you literally cannot trust anyone in all these crucial arenas. The ironic thing about the CIA, they were inept at what they were suppose to be doing. The Soviet’s and East Germans ran circles around them. But the CIA was very accomplished in subverting the American government and many nations attempting self government after years of empirical rule..that’s all for me. Sorry to bend your ear.
Heeeeyyyy this library is where I worked my 2nd job at 16 years old then I joined the US AIR FORCE AT 19 years and retired at 39 years old DAMMIT LIFE FLASHED BEFORE MY EYES! Thank you for the memories!!😢😢😢
"CHE LVES!" [I wrote that on the walls in the US Navy in Puerto Rico, 1968-'69. They made me sand it off.
I also used a cutting torch, cut out a peace symbol out of a barrel lid, painted it white and got this younger guy to climb the pole that had the PA sysyem speaker and hang it over the speaker. Days later, the battalion Exec Officer came over there with a PO1 and they took it down with wire cutters.]
You had to be there.
M
Also, there were two Oswalds and also, the Mossad of Israel were involved in getting snipers from the Corsican Mafia in position in Dealey Plaza, a scheme that was largely the work of Bill Harvey, Angleton's associate at CIA.
After the assassination, Israel was able to keep American support AND build nuclear weapons. They were going to build nuclear weapons anyway, but killing Kennedy meant that they, Israel, were able to complete their development of nuclear weapons and also keep American support. The Israelis were convinced that Kennedy was going to send in paratroopers to take over and shut down the Dimona Nuclear Reactor Facility in the Negev Desert.
Not kidding.
M
@@MMorMM I well understand this and the USA is in a sad state of affairs."Powers that Be," control,dictate "what occurs" in the USA and other countries controlled by them.
Its mind boggling how much the US owe to Europe and the Middle East.
In Greece. My family always said. Imagine how peaceful the world could have been without the Americans.
All the millions and millions and millions of lives that could of been Saved if the USA didn't exist.
Yes and no. Use the science of physics to ascertain that what will be will be and que sera sera but as much as we tried to help, we got demons too. So im sorry. I am a victim of america and even mexico, even stupid amsterdam honestly but as long as computers exist u will have “god as a computer” aka the cia which is actually global and tries to mitigate bombing random people but is more specific
Rename Dulles International Airport
Yes 100%. Rename Dulles airport as Pound Airport or Mullins Airport after Eustace Mullins.
Only 15k viewers in 5 years, what does this show us?
The truth is bitter,
The powers to be,of which the CIA is a tool of, feel the ends justify the means. It doesn't
poeple are not tortured for information. torture is a mind control technique.
Dark does describe him
Also. Islamic extremism and the British government go back a long way.
I recommend the new edition of the historian Mark Curtis book Secret Affairs:
Britain's Collusion with Radical Islam and terrorist groups since the 1940s. It will tell you what the news doesn't.
Whoh! Great info. You know what fits in with all this information? HAVANA SYNDROME
What the hell was that part about Dulles looking at his victims' faces as he snapped their necks?!! Wtf?! I know Dulles had countless people killed, but did he actually kill people himself?!! And did he talk about it to his mistress?!!
Mr Hand can you explain history to me agian?
Add 2014 Ukraine to the list
I think that the key word and idea in the devil's chessboard is the devil himself. Here that internet thought police?
Holy smokes.
Howdy
You got to fight for your right to party. cheers
WTF was all of this for? cheap avocados and bananas
🧐
Jesus! the recent videos have barely double digit views! shocker -import
May I ask what's the readers feelings about the death of Clinton author Barbara Olson on 9/11...
Cuba is not autocratic
I wouldn't be proud of the fact that he saved Clinton's a$$. Not exactly a huge accomplishment.
So is this guy a communist? I’m a bit confused? If communism was so good why did my family in Poland who owned their own large farm get it taken away in Poland and went hungry as they were not allowed to eat what they grew? I’m confused as to this man’s bias?
Idk why did america take nationalized land from Guatemalan farmers in 1953? America and the soviets both did terrible things you ever use your brain and realize you dont have to support neither america or the soviets because we both commited crimes
When was your family’s “large farm” taken away? Was your family farm over 50 hectares? How did your family secure such large holdings? Was your family affiliated with Polish fascists or where they German? Did your family’s holdings include forest land? Do you think that land should be concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy people whose source of wealth are dubious? Do you think that an oligarchy is a sign of a healthy society and that it shouldn’t be totally destroyed where ever it occurs in order that ultimate power rests with the people rather than a few greedy oligarchs? Answers to these questions would help me provide some guidance to you.
@@platosbeard4449 My great-grandmother’s farm was also taken away in Eastern Ukraine in the early 1930s. Are you suggesting that owing land is a sign of being an oligarch? Also, how low could you, communists, stoop by indirectly suggesting the OP’s family affiliated itself with the Nazis?
@@platosbeard4449
_you aren't worthy even to praise Plato, let alone use his name_
@@МаксимЛяшко-и3ъ could have been a Kulak and a counter revolutionary. But all land rests with the state on behalf of the public/community. Did your great grand mother create an iota of sand in order to lay claim to land? What gives people the right to seize land from the commons and lay claim to it as their private property? Aside from your home which is personal space, why should anyone own land separate from the commons? How did your great grand mother get the land in the first place (I assume you’re talking about a large farm here)? You’ll probably find out that it was seized in the first instance by landlords from the public space. It may have been sold on in pieces subsequently but this does not obviate the initial crime.
THE GAY INTERVIEWER IS ALL ABOUT HIMSELF. WHAT A WASTE...AND A WASTE OF AN INTERVIEW.
You the same 'David talbot' trolling the Kathy griffin beheading??
Davie
Davie
Davie Talbot
I am new to DT and I am tracking and appreciating the illumination into Dispicable Dulles.................and then the wheels fell off.
DT is a member of the very group he criticizes. His excuruation of the Occupy movement's organic response to Wall St's s..tty character and then blunders forward and defamed Ed Snowden's contributions. Uhhhhh.......so how is DT not an establishment acolyte?
If it wasn't Dulles it would have been James anglelton
hes completely wrong on mccarthy
he's a lib
@@greghay3709 libs wrong about everything
@@mikejones9961 your comment reeks of ignorance.
@@greghay3709 go stuff some ballot boxes, stupid. That's the only way to beat Trump
@@mikejones9961 i agree, communism is the only way forward