It's time to revisit the super genius Yogendra Yadav's "Congress must die" idea. Rahul Gandhi is an arrogant, overconfident, and stubborn fool. There are plentiful areas to take on Modi, but Rahul is neither able to connect nor inspire. The whole media was against Trump, yet he prevailed against Kamala because he focussed on real issues. Rahul is too alien for India.
I'm listening from Canada and I don't understand the language. What was said about places of Worship? Anyone? We have had over 100 Churches burned, Synagogues vandalized and now Islam who has 1000s of Mosques, is taking over our streets in prayer.
The audience Q was whether the judgment on the Places of Worship Act will be the defining legacy of the new CJI, which has only 1 one-year term (Context: An Indian CJI can serve only up to the age of 65. The current Chief Justice, Mr Khanna is already 64. He got promotion late). The other Q was whether the government was planning to remove the Places of Worship Act (Context: The Places of Worship Act states that the status of a mosque or a temple would be considered from 1947. This Act was passed after the demolition of Babri Masjid, which was originally built by demolishing the Ram Temple. I'll digress a bit here to inform you that a Ram Temple now stands at the site. It was constructed after favorable judgment from a legal battle initiated in 1885. Do not let anyone fool you. It is legally established that a temple stood at Ayoydhya. The place is sacred to Hindus as it is considered the birthplace of a revered deity, Lord Ram. In its judgment, the court did not comment on who demolished the temple. It is not hard to fill this void with a little bit of common sense, given the fact that 800 AD to 1400 AD was a tough period for India as it witnessed a brutal Islamic invasion. Coming back to the main issue, the Act had many problems. There were already multiple legal battles about several disputed "places of worship" even before this act. The current Govt is led by the BJP. It's a Hindu nationalist party). The response from the speaker was basically vague. He only responded to the first Q and stated that legal matters take time and he'll have to wait and see how things work out. (My opinion: The debate on the act ignited after the former CJI's oral observation wherein he said archaeological surveys unearthing the history of a place "may not necessarily fall foul" of the Places of Worship Act. Now, you need to understand three things - 1)It is not possible to reclaim everything that was lost to history. Even Israel is not constructing the Temple of Solomon at Al Aqsa. 2) However, should that stop us from deciphering the history of a particular place? In a just world, it should not, but the elements involved here are too volatile to control. India is a deeply religious country. Personally, I am happy with the Ram Temple, and I do not support other Hindu claims. However, there are certain illegal possession of Temples by you-know-who which must be returned back to us. These were not demolished structures. They were simply taken by just claiming and entering like idiots. One of those is the Sambhal Temple dispute, which triggered this discussion. PS: The commentator deliberately avoided a straight answer. (Hint: Avoid Samuel Paty fate)
@@sankalp6872 So the Act is about who can claim ownership depending on a Temples previous use? May I ask if Hindus stop at Prayer Time and take over Streets or someone else's Retail Stores to pray? This is getting out of control here. Yes, I know about the Ottomons and now they are expanding throughout the world again. Big thanks from Canada who needs to know what Normal is.
SG & DK Think over and tell us , if you can do your shows excluding PM Modi for atleast two weeks. Take Tamilnadu , Telangana, Andhra, MP. subject. (You are unable to see beyond PM Modi criticism)
People's questions tend to be long winded - could you truncate them just taking the key points rather than just read out their questions. I personally lose track especially when there are more than one question and each question had a huge commentary from the one posing the question.
Dear DK, it seems you cleverly ignored the issues raised by Opposition MPs including Priyanka, Akhilesh, Mahua and others. In addition, you glorified PM after a very ordinary speech. PM has become a prisoner of the past. The failure of PM to adress the glaring issues was not mentioned by DK.
Sir baal Budhi ko aana bhi toh chahiye yeah sab. Bolta hai ki Indira ji sey baat Huwa tha uska regarding Savarkar sahab. Itna dimag aaj nhi hai uska tab Kahan se hoga.
When DK says INDI Block then he looses trust of viewers as unbiased reporter! DK you can criticise Congress but using keywords of BJP shows you're not unbiased (you're not naive reporter)
Lol, so if someone does not follow one side narrative then they become biased ? the name itself is "I.N.D.I Alliance " or " "I.N.D.IA". You can't call it "I.N.D.I.A Alliance" as it will be "I.N.D.I.A.A"
Laws biased because if same offence is committed by a woman then she is not punished like a man is punished after committing that same crime. So LAWS are BIASED for eg. If a man abuses a woman he will be jailed for 3 years but if a woman abuses a man there is no punishment for her
Gobhijis speech as usual is a no-brainer! Dharm and dhanda go hand in glove at the expense of half of the country hungry and the other half naked,! Truly insufferable tool!
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
It's time to revisit the super genius Yogendra Yadav's "Congress must die" idea. Rahul Gandhi is an arrogant, overconfident, and stubborn fool. There are plentiful areas to take on Modi, but Rahul is neither able to connect nor inspire. The whole media was against Trump, yet he prevailed against Kamala because he focussed on real issues. Rahul is too alien for India.
The print plz bring back सुरक्षा, संकट और स्वामी show 😊
The biggest baggage of congress is Rahul, sooner they shed it better it would be for them.
Please bring SG back to this show
High time Shekhar Gupta comes back to Headlines ke peeche
Apurva and DK ❤
DK says, “आम आदमी पार्टी में MCD इलेक्शंस जीत कर गलती कर दी”।
I think there in lies the current state of uneasiness of AAP.
Well explained 👍
Is it intentional or what I don't know, why is discussions on "Atul Subhash's suicide case " not in the headlines ke peeche
Shekhar Gupta is miles better than DK
Dhankar shall resign!!!
Good analysis by DK, like is style of to the point answering. Keep it up 👍🏼
I'm listening from Canada and I don't understand the language. What was said about places of Worship? Anyone?
We have had over 100 Churches burned, Synagogues vandalized and now Islam who has 1000s of Mosques, is taking over
our streets in prayer.
The audience Q was whether the judgment on the Places of Worship Act will be the defining legacy of the new CJI, which has only 1 one-year term (Context: An Indian CJI can serve only up to the age of 65. The current Chief Justice, Mr Khanna is already 64. He got promotion late). The other Q was whether the government was planning to remove the Places of Worship Act (Context: The Places of Worship Act states that the status of a mosque or a temple would be considered from 1947. This Act was passed after the demolition of Babri Masjid, which was originally built by demolishing the Ram Temple. I'll digress a bit here to inform you that a Ram Temple now stands at the site. It was constructed after favorable judgment from a legal battle initiated in 1885. Do not let anyone fool you. It is legally established that a temple stood at Ayoydhya. The place is sacred to Hindus as it is considered the birthplace of a revered deity, Lord Ram. In its judgment, the court did not comment on who demolished the temple. It is not hard to fill this void with a little bit of common sense, given the fact that 800 AD to 1400 AD was a tough period for India as it witnessed a brutal Islamic invasion. Coming back to the main issue, the Act had many problems. There were already multiple legal battles about several disputed "places of worship" even before this act. The current Govt is led by the BJP. It's a Hindu nationalist party).
The response from the speaker was basically vague. He only responded to the first Q and stated that legal matters take time and he'll have to wait and see how things work out. (My opinion: The debate on the act ignited after the former CJI's oral observation wherein he said archaeological surveys unearthing the history of a place "may not necessarily fall foul" of the Places of Worship Act. Now, you need to understand three things - 1)It is not possible to reclaim everything that was lost to history. Even Israel is not constructing the Temple of Solomon at Al Aqsa. 2) However, should that stop us from deciphering the history of a particular place? In a just world, it should not, but the elements involved here are too volatile to control. India is a deeply religious country. Personally, I am happy with the Ram Temple, and I do not support other Hindu claims. However, there are certain illegal possession of Temples by you-know-who which must be returned back to us. These were not demolished structures. They were simply taken by just claiming and entering like idiots. One of those is the Sambhal Temple dispute, which triggered this discussion.
PS: The commentator deliberately avoided a straight answer. (Hint: Avoid Samuel Paty fate)
@@sankalp6872 So the Act is about who can claim ownership depending on a Temples previous use?
May I ask if Hindus stop at Prayer Time and take over Streets or someone else's Retail Stores to pray?
This is getting out of control here.
Yes, I know about the Ottomons and now they are expanding throughout the world again.
Big thanks from Canada who needs to know what Normal is.
DK ko bahut dard hota hai Congress ki incapability pe.
SG & DK
Think over and tell us , if you can do your shows excluding PM Modi for atleast two weeks. Take Tamilnadu , Telangana, Andhra, MP. subject. (You are unable to see beyond PM Modi criticism)
People's questions tend to be long winded - could you truncate them just taking the key points rather than just read out their questions. I personally lose track especially when there are more than one question and each question had a huge commentary from the one posing the question.
DK seems baised as he is speaking indi alliance is he a bhakt
Dear DK, it seems you cleverly ignored the issues raised by Opposition MPs including Priyanka, Akhilesh, Mahua and others. In addition, you glorified PM after a very ordinary speech. PM has become a prisoner of the past. The failure of PM to adress the glaring issues was not mentioned by DK.
What did he miss? Try to elaborate..
Sir baal Budhi ko aana bhi toh chahiye yeah sab. Bolta hai ki Indira ji sey baat Huwa tha uska regarding Savarkar sahab. Itna dimag aaj nhi hai uska tab Kahan se hoga.
When DK says INDI Block then he looses trust of viewers as unbiased reporter! DK you can criticise Congress but using keywords of BJP shows you're not unbiased (you're not naive reporter)
It IS INDI Block. What else is it?
Lol, so if someone does not follow one side narrative then they become biased ? the name itself is "I.N.D.I Alliance " or " "I.N.D.IA". You can't call it "I.N.D.I.A Alliance" as it will be "I.N.D.I.A.A"
Lol, don't be this sensitive! what should he say? I.N.D.I.A.A ? the last A is for alliance only!
Should be called India Alliance....@@PanakaluPoonakam...😂😂😂
Nazi symbol @@PanakaluPoonakam
Laws biased because if same offence is committed by a woman then she is not punished like a man is punished after committing that same crime.
So LAWS are BIASED
for eg. If a man abuses a woman he will be jailed for 3 years but if a woman abuses a man there is no punishment for her
Gobhijis speech as usual is a no-brainer! Dharm and dhanda go hand in glove at the expense of half of the country hungry and the other half naked,! Truly insufferable tool!