fixing/optimising the calendar and where f1 goes will greatly reduce emissions compared to a more electric-focused f1 car (so we can bring back V8s and make fans happier)
Even if they don't reach net zero by 2030 - which is really ambitious by the way, as long as the sport is trending in the right direction - a win is a win. Aim for the stars and land on the moon type vibes. 🎉
one way they could help reach net zero is by focusing on bundling the schedule to have the races in the same region back-to-back rather than having them all over the place and back. That way they don't have to ship everything minimalizing the amount of fuel used.
Chinese milk tea shops are promoting "0-calorie sugar," which is a great marketing gimmick. I am quite concerned that these 0-calorie sugars may still be harmful to people... perhaps even worse than the conventional white sugar previously used.😢
Say what you will, I do NOT envy the first woman team principal to join the grid, and I pray for the poor woman who will be the first driver in the series. Hard to find a bigger boys club than f1...
The term "net zero" is absolute nonsense because of the word "net". What this means is that you can burn as much as you like and generate as much CO2 and other green house gases as you like, as long as you can use some form of crazy accountancy to offset the CO2 that you have generated. When in reality the offset to the CO2 will never actually offset the amount of CO2 you generate. It's all just a big accountancy con trick. What you need to do is skip the word "net" and get your emissions to zero, and not "net zero".
You are confusing "net zero" and "carbon neutral." They are not the same thing. Net zero is all about reducing emissions based on a baseline, while carbon neutral is more about offsetting emissions with things like carbon credits. For carbon neutrality, you don’t have to change anything in your operations-you just pay to "cancel out" emissions. F1’s goal is to reduce emissions as much as possible. The only way to truly avoid emissions would be to stop racing altogether! So they’ll eventually need some offsets too since, realistically, anything we do has an impact and no technology is perfect.
fixing/optimising the calendar and where f1 goes will greatly reduce emissions compared to a more electric-focused f1 car (so we can bring back V8s and make fans happier)
Even if they don't reach net zero by 2030 - which is really ambitious by the way, as long as the sport is trending in the right direction - a win is a win. Aim for the stars and land on the moon type vibes. 🎉
"Shoot for the Moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.” - Norman Vincent Peale
one way they could help reach net zero is by focusing on bundling the schedule to have the races in the same region back-to-back rather than having them all over the place and back. That way they don't have to ship everything minimalizing the amount of fuel used.
Gaslighting. Nobody is reaching net zero by their deadlines. "Cash is king"
yea, but F1 drivers travel mostly in their private jet plane.
That’s only when there in Europe they fly private.
F1 the panicle of motorsports ❤❤😊😊
Chinese milk tea shops are promoting "0-calorie sugar," which is a great marketing gimmick. I am quite concerned that these 0-calorie sugars may still be harmful to people... perhaps even worse than the conventional white sugar previously used.😢
this intro deserves the like already
i think big issue is with F1 drivers and chiefs using private jets to travel for the races,which i think should be a bigger concern.
What a marvelous piece of greenwashing. If you happen to be at a track, it will take 10 seconds that the least concern is the environment.
It is literally in the video that the on-track aspects are
The best to reduce carbon on F1 is that every single country turn down F1. Coming from Singapore commuters perspective, is a hindrance to traffic.
Veto Electric
💥
Say what you will, I do NOT envy the first woman team principal to join the grid, and I pray for the poor woman who will be the first driver in the series. Hard to find a bigger boys club than f1...
There has already been at least one female Team Principal. Several female drivers have featured, too.
@@R4356th I think you know what I mean though
@@R4356th did not know there had been a woman principal though! thank s for informing me!
There have actually been women drivers in F1 before! It’s just been quite a while since a woman made it onto the grid.
@@R4356thhow did that turn out?
The term "net zero" is absolute nonsense because of the word "net".
What this means is that you can burn as much as you like and generate as much CO2 and other green house gases as you like, as long as you can use some form of crazy accountancy to offset the CO2 that you have generated. When in reality the offset to the CO2 will never actually offset the amount of CO2 you generate.
It's all just a big accountancy con trick.
What you need to do is skip the word "net" and get your emissions to zero, and not "net zero".
fact is, there is no "getting your emissions to zero", hence F1 can't escape from the word "net".
You are confusing "net zero" and "carbon neutral." They are not the same thing. Net zero is all about reducing emissions based on a baseline, while carbon neutral is more about offsetting emissions with things like carbon credits. For carbon neutrality, you don’t have to change anything in your operations-you just pay to "cancel out" emissions. F1’s goal is to reduce emissions as much as possible. The only way to truly avoid emissions would be to stop racing altogether! So they’ll eventually need some offsets too since, realistically, anything we do has an impact and no technology is perfect.
@esterfon-pat8723 wrong
I don’t think about non of that when I think of f1! I think of senna! Schumacher! Prost! Luada! The real times of this organization!
who cares
People with a moral compass, also you, why else would you watch & comment?