Timbre: why different instruments playing the same tone sound different

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • "The same tone" is not the same at all. We usually think of a tone as the frequency of one sound: the fundamental frequency common to all instruments exemplified here, but every tone is in fact a complex entity - a chord if you will - consisting of many other simple tones.
    These simple tones are reiterations of the same energy, on different levels. They are harmonically related to each other (do not confuse true harmony with the simultaneous playing of equal tempered tones). The simple mathematical law governing the harmonic series is depicted here: the fundamental frequency at 128 Hz is harmonic 1, or simply the fundamental. The next harmonic oscillates exactly 2 times faster at 256 Hz; harmonic 3 precisely 3 times giving 384 Hz, and so on.
    This progression 1 2 3 4 5 ... generating aurally unequal tones continues to infinity. Physically, a harmonically rich timbre like that of the sitar or accordion goes beyond the 120th harmonic - visible on the graphic. Musically, the Harmonic Series is nature's perfect tuning system, generating perfectly consonant harmonies.
    [Note that "tone" means "sound with regular structure" and has no connection to the definition given to it by Western music theory. Some of the overtone series in the video are not perfectly harmonic, that is, bearing exactly whole number relationships with the lowest frequency, because of the physicality of the instruments. The stiffness of strings together with the exciting action performed upon them (like striking and plucking) are responsible for the stretching or compressing the series into numbers that are not 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 but for example 1 - 2,001 - 3,002 - 4,003 - 5,004 - 6,005 and so on. This is called "inharmonicity".]
    The program used in making this video is
    Overtone Analyzer by Sygyt Software:
    www.sygyt.com/
    The sound file analyzed (with a +11dB difference in volume):
    whatmusicreally...
    More about What Music Really İs:
    whatmusicreally...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 120

  • @__________5737
    @__________5737 Рік тому +23

    TLDR it is the number and amplitude of harmonics produced by a voice or instrument that define the timbre, but they all share the fundamental tone being the biggest contributor

    • @Fromagreatheight
      @Fromagreatheight Рік тому +2

      Yeah. Root tone with 0 harmonics would be a sine wave

    • @Chris-sv8ty
      @Chris-sv8ty 5 місяців тому

      Noise also plays a part especially with the percussive elements

    • @guascamsb8138
      @guascamsb8138 3 місяці тому

      But it wasn't, for the viola and the accordion? Still confused.

  • @Lucius_Chiaraviglio
    @Lucius_Chiaraviglio Рік тому +5

    With respect to the comment in the video about how out of tune 12-tone is: When you consider harmonic substitution by way of tempering, 12EDO actually isn't so out of tune after all. For starters, it has a very good perfect fifth -- you have to go all the way to 29EDO to do better (although an unequal temperament of an intermediate number of divisions of the octave could potentially do better). Yes, the 12EDO minor third (300 cents, 4th root of 2) is nearly 16 cents flat of its nominal 6/5, but it falls very close to both 19/16 and (closer yet) 25/21, which has pretty good consonance. Yes, the major third (400 cents, cube root of 2) is nearly 14 cents sharp of its nominal 5/4, but it falls almost perfectly on top of 63/50 and (if you go slightly more sharp) 24/19 -- those are a bit more rough, but not too bad. And the minor seventh (1000 cents) is WAY off from its nominal 7/4 . . . but it substitutes this by being very close to 16/9 and 25/14 -- definitely not to specification, but at least a pretty good-sounding substitute. And I think the perfect roots of 2 -- 4th root and cube root already mentioned, and square root (tritone) themselves have virtue, especially with the square root of 2 getting a lot of use in modern jazz, but also significant use in Baroque music.

  • @katiekeen7019
    @katiekeen7019 5 років тому +15

    Love how the intro music was the harmonic/ overtone series. Pretty neat.

  • @charlivy.e
    @charlivy.e 4 роки тому +76

    is anybody else watching this for school? xd

  • @郭路
    @郭路 Рік тому +11

    I would like to know the name of this analysis software。

    • @thibaultmenz
      @thibaultmenz Рік тому +6

      Sygyt Software's Overone Analyser is mentioned at the end of the video :)

  • @java311
    @java311 9 років тому +2

    Which program did you used to record this video ? It was awesome !!! :D

  • @aaronbanks8577
    @aaronbanks8577 9 років тому +2

    Great tutorial could you do more instruments? What do you mean by compare with the lines behind, those lines are not in sync with whole/integer harmonics, their equal all the way up, should be getting smaller and smaller

    • @whatmusicreallyis
      @whatmusicreallyis  9 років тому +2

      Aaron Banks That's precisely my point: Western musical culture takes those artificially created lines (the 12-tone equal tempered tuning of the piano) as standard. Here you see just how inappropriate that is.
      Re. more instruments: Perhaps it would be better to do 110 Hz because it related with the standard these instruments were tuned to when recorded and this way there's no pitch-shifting & time-stretching of the samples.
      By the way, this approach also explains "inharmonicity": imgur.com/D7OZpHZ

  • @mlhu9699
    @mlhu9699 4 роки тому +1

    Great demonstration! What App did you use to draw the spectrogram?

    • @nielsmiller1858
      @nielsmiller1858 4 роки тому +2

      Hello, the creator used the Overtone Analyzer, this is the previous version of VoceVista Video. You can find this software for free download at www.vocevista.com/purchase-vocevista-video-for-mac-and-pc/

  • @senul976
    @senul976 3 роки тому +4

    Does anybody know what Note was played?

    • @j8aco
      @j8aco 3 роки тому +8

      C 128,40 Hz

    • @senul976
      @senul976 3 роки тому +1

      @@j8aco thank you

  • @azizaahmad3557
    @azizaahmad3557 3 роки тому +3

    اذني: سأخبر الله بكل شي 🙂💔

  • @BohdanTrotsenko
    @BohdanTrotsenko 4 роки тому

    I have an alternative spectrogramming algorithm :)

  • @davidgrout1056
    @davidgrout1056 4 роки тому +10

    This explains why accordions ruin everything

    • @camonthejam
      @camonthejam 3 роки тому

      You lie

    • @gastonrobles2870
      @gastonrobles2870 3 роки тому +1

      oh... go fuck yourself. btw, I love how the comment section of a really nice scientific demonstration turns into a hate therapy session

    • @davidgrout1056
      @davidgrout1056 3 роки тому +1

      @@gastonrobles2870 things were pretty civil until you chimed in

    • @gastonrobles2870
      @gastonrobles2870 3 роки тому

      @@davidgrout1056 I know, I´m an asshole, I´m just wondering why all us assholes got clustered in here. mmm. me, personally, I got triggered by the accordion comment. I got some great performers I could recomend. what music do you like?

    • @davidgrout1056
      @davidgrout1056 3 роки тому

      @@gastonrobles2870 I like prog rock, bebop, bluegrass, Frank Zappa, Rush, Steely Dan, REM, Talking Heads, Tribal Tech, and Shostakovich, to name a few. I also have extensive hands-on experience with accordion players: I was the percussionist with Valery Kovtun, Russia's best accordionist, for many years. I also worked for a TV news company, and did an entire story on accordions. I respect talented players on any instrument, but you won't change my mind about the sound of the accordion. It saturates the air with overtones, and the constant crescendos and decrescendos irritate me.

  • @rs-tarxvfz
    @rs-tarxvfz 4 роки тому +12

    I am computer professional and I hate how the classic people treat music as complicated concepts and all weird notation. There is no scientific consensus and its real hard to learn the music as arcane art.
    People in music talk about perception which is hard to translate in science. Only exists is the Sound Waves, Frequencies and amplitudes along with physics notion of Nodes and anti-node, superposition, attenuation etc etc.
    Can we make music more scientific in 3rd Millennium ?

    • @ShanevsDCsniperr
      @ShanevsDCsniperr 4 роки тому +11

      who the fuck would want to do that lol

    • @Persun_McPersonson
      @Persun_McPersonson 4 роки тому +1

      @@ShanevsDCsniperr
      Seeing as your name is Libtard, I don't think anyone expects an intelligent opinion from you. And here you are, proving it right.

    • @ShanevsDCsniperr
      @ShanevsDCsniperr 4 роки тому +8

      @@Persun_McPersonson the name is obviously meant in jest but i'm not surprised someone who would focus in on that word would have trouble with reading comprehension lol. in any case, do you care to explain why you think "more scientific" art would be more desirable? there is no scientific consensus about art and nor should there be. art is the realm of ambiguity and subjectivity and interpetation. of course there are physical properties to sound and all other media, but understanding physics or electrical engineering does not make one a great composer or a great synthesist, for example. i'm not opposed to artists being educated or developing an understanding of scientific concepts relevant to their medium (i'm classically trained), but looking for scientific consensus on a subject like music is evidence of a limited worldview and an event more limited perspective on the actual value of art imo.

    • @Persun_McPersonson
      @Persun_McPersonson 4 роки тому

      @@ShanevsDCsniperr
      I'm a libtard myself and was just shitposting haha. It would've probably been a good idea to exaggerate a bit more to highlight my non-seriousness...

    • @ShanevsDCsniperr
      @ShanevsDCsniperr 4 роки тому +3

      @@Persun_McPersonson poe's law lol

  • @rdox23
    @rdox23 4 роки тому

    xd f

  • @traininggrounds9450
    @traininggrounds9450 5 років тому +3

    So what is music really? It should be the expression of truth in harmony.

    • @kornbread5359
      @kornbread5359 4 роки тому +3

      Music, is an idea which originates in the conscious, which then unconsciously executes crazy math equations to stimulate neurons to control body to operate a musical instrument created by another humans imagination who had in mind the frequency of waves induced into the air by vibration of an object and specific frequencies react nicely to eachother and then they go into the ear and bounce off a drum with an electrical signal running through it changing its energy which is measured by the brain and converted into something we can hear and somehow triggers chemical emotions in the body and the sound also goes into a microphone where it is again converted to electrical signal, then digital, where it can be manipulated by a computer using 1s and 0s to change all characterics of the wave and then is converted to a radiowave where it can travel at the speed of light to an atenna and be converted again so the world can hear it 🤔

    • @Unkn.9wn
      @Unkn.9wn 4 роки тому

      @@kornbread5359 "so the world can hear it"... & eventually one will say: I have an idea!

    • @purungo
      @purungo 4 роки тому

      @@kornbread5359 gay

    • @dopaminecloud
      @dopaminecloud Рік тому +1

      what truth is there in numbers? they're all true as they are
      your obsession with simplicity and symmetry has nothing to do with truth or music, you're just looking for easy brain stimulation

  • @femyeah3064
    @femyeah3064 3 роки тому +20

    The chord in the intro is A major dominant 7th add 9 add 10 if anyone wondering.

    • @AdamMaykov
      @AdamMaykov 2 роки тому

      its overtones

    • @femyeah3064
      @femyeah3064 2 роки тому +1

      @@AdamMaykov yep but can be heard

    • @AdamMaykov
      @AdamMaykov 2 роки тому

      @@femyeah3064 of course

  • @racerdylan
    @racerdylan Місяць тому +5

    Anyone who's watching this with a growing music driven curiosity?. Would love some more ideas to get a better undstanding and deep dive into the subject of sound and waveforms, anyone any help?

  • @dtagzALT
    @dtagzALT 2 місяці тому +9

    THAT HARMONIC SERIES INTO THO WTFF

  • @CasuallyYoursTuhinBanerjee
    @CasuallyYoursTuhinBanerjee 3 роки тому +5

    Thanks for clearing my one year old doubt 🙏

  • @elkbloodheart1188
    @elkbloodheart1188 5 років тому +4

    I love the shakuhashi at the end, really beutifull wave

  • @tomlavelle8518
    @tomlavelle8518 3 роки тому +3

    Awesome visual aid!

  • @rs-tarxvfz
    @rs-tarxvfz 3 роки тому +3

    Have you used Fourier Transform to separate the frequencies? What software?

    • @SamirPatnaik
      @SamirPatnaik 2 роки тому +2

      The software he is using is Overtone Analyzer by Sygyt software. The visualisations you see in this videos are not possible without FFT.

  • @TrisnoadiWikantoro
    @TrisnoadiWikantoro 5 років тому +1

    Very good video! This is what I've been wondering for a few years. Thank UA-cam recommended this to me

  • @cycrothelargeplanet
    @cycrothelargeplanet 2 роки тому +8

    I love the additive synthesis intro

  • @beminja5558
    @beminja5558 4 роки тому +2

    they were all the same hertz though? it was the same c with all the instuments? am i missing something?

    • @dariusduesentrieb
      @dariusduesentrieb 4 роки тому +10

      yes, they had all the same fundamental frequency (128 Hz). the most important point, why all these instruments sound different, is because the harmonics are not always the same volume compared to the volume of the fundamental frequency.

    • @borpie
      @borpie 4 роки тому

      @@dariusduesentrieb so the harmonics are like a residual? I call it residual because some had alot of movement from the 'main' frequency. not sure if that made sense :/

    • @dariusduesentrieb
      @dariusduesentrieb 4 роки тому

      @@borpie I don't understand what you mean with residual (sorry I'm not a native English speaker, I could just be that I don't know the correct meaning of the word).

    • @borpie
      @borpie 4 роки тому

      @@dariusduesentrieb kind of like 'what's left over' i cant really articulate it well so if you still dont understand it''s totally ok

    • @hasanyalki6669
      @hasanyalki6669 11 днів тому

      Can “digitally changing sounds ie what you play on electric guitar is transformed into a piano sound with a processor” be explained with this? Changing the residual/smaller frequencies of guitar into the smaller freqs of piano tahn replicating the timbre?

  • @whatmusicreallyis
    @whatmusicreallyis  9 років тому

    +igopepra Download the source file from the link in the description, lower the volume 11dB and analyze it to your liking.

  • @OfficialMstar
    @OfficialMstar 4 роки тому +2

    yoyoyo bun sarib

  • @igopepra
    @igopepra 9 років тому

    hello and thanks for the video is great! ... I just want to know which was the amplitude in dB used during the recording of these sounds ... thanks!

  • @masterliu
    @masterliu 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you for this video. This greatly increased my understanding of music. Answered a lot of questions. Well done experiment and presentation of results.

  • @7g_21_louisdanendra9
    @7g_21_louisdanendra9 7 місяців тому +4

    Is it because the amplitude?

    • @7g_21_louisdanendra9
      @7g_21_louisdanendra9 7 місяців тому

      Different amplitude in every periode or we can say that it is
      Just like different volume every(lamda)

    • @ravenovraver
      @ravenovraver 3 місяці тому +1

      the title of this video is wrong instead of tone the video is referring to pitch . different instruments playing the same pitch have different timbre and therefore sounds different . [timbre explanation- the sound producing or vibration creating part of different instruments are made of different material so whenever the instruments vibrate it creates different after effects of the vibration (like different sets of harmonics and overtones)]

    • @ram.shac.kl.e
      @ram.shac.kl.e 3 місяці тому +1

      its because of the overtones

  • @Abdussalam-ml3so
    @Abdussalam-ml3so 4 роки тому +4

    ...
    My ears hurt

  • @PrinceSwaggy
    @PrinceSwaggy 5 років тому +2

    Which produces the most harmonics

  • @skrivbordslampan6923
    @skrivbordslampan6923 5 років тому +1

    Really just why things sound different in general.

  • @sayijinsupremo9961
    @sayijinsupremo9961 3 роки тому

    Irivel

  • @danilooviedo8215
    @danilooviedo8215 4 роки тому

    f

  • @qlfix3494
    @qlfix3494 4 роки тому +10

    maybe be they sound diffrent because they're not the same instrument

    • @Spherey
      @Spherey 4 роки тому +16

      no its because each overtone has a different volume

    • @jakegearhart
      @jakegearhart 4 роки тому +1

      Well yes, but why do different instruments sound different? That's the question. If you play a note, let's take C for example, that sound wave travels through the air. But if I play the note C on a different instrument, it sounds different, even though the same C note sound wave is traveling through the air. The reason is because there's "hidden" notes that your brain filters out.

    • @rs-tarxvfz
      @rs-tarxvfz 4 роки тому +1

      @@jakegearhart It is not cancels out, I believe is is due to superpositions of different waves that gives characteristic perception.

    • @jakegearhart
      @jakegearhart 4 роки тому

      @@rs-tarxvfz No, it is your brain filtering out overtones. Here's an example: ua-cam.com/video/Wx_kugSemfY/v-deo.html

    • @minamishi
      @minamishi 4 роки тому +3

      that completely misses the concept that's being explored in this video.