Repeated-Measures ANOVA

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @cheskys.5910
    @cheskys.5910 5 років тому +26

    You out here saving careers and lives. Thank you, you're a godsend.

  • @Tntpker
    @Tntpker 6 років тому +3

    this guys lectures from 2010 are way better than some that are put on right now

  • @AlexTseng007
    @AlexTseng007 12 років тому +2

    Thank you for your elaboration on the concepts and calculation of reapeated-measures ANOVA, which helps me review the past quantitative lessons several weeks ago!

  • @sneaky2273
    @sneaky2273 3 місяці тому

    14 yrs ago, this vid keeps on helping people ❤

  • @sarajevavazquez200
    @sarajevavazquez200 2 роки тому

    I passed my exam because of this video! Thank you!

  • @hmuucsd
    @hmuucsd 3 роки тому

    The clearly listed steps for the statistical tests are so helpful! Thank you for creating these video!

  • @gregoryschreiter8505
    @gregoryschreiter8505 10 років тому +18

    You said we were going to use dferror and dfbetween to determine the critical value, but the table you have used has dfwithin x dfbetween. In this table, you want the F critical value corresponding to (2,18) not (2,12).

  • @RoseRobbins_rbns
    @RoseRobbins_rbns 7 років тому +1

    Your video works like a charm! Thank you

  • @taladiv3415
    @taladiv3415 Рік тому

    Thank you for your explanation video.
    I still have trouble finding an explanation video about the effect-size for the repeated-measures ANOVA, with its confidence interval.

  • @Muuip
    @Muuip 4 роки тому

    Great concise presentation, much appreciated! 👍

  • @adebayoayomichael-np3pj
    @adebayoayomichael-np3pj 5 місяців тому

    Please, how do we calculate the p-value? I’m lost in that part. Thank you for the video❤

  • @MrJdmk8
    @MrJdmk8 11 років тому

    Thank you so much, you saved my degree!

  • @MuskanMadaan
    @MuskanMadaan 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much this series helped me a lot!!

  • @DrJadeBalfour
    @DrJadeBalfour 13 років тому

    Very nice walkthrough! I really appreciate it.

  • @PersianKhavos
    @PersianKhavos 10 років тому +1

    Thank you so much! You just saved me! This video was very helpful

  • @akileshoogarah9349
    @akileshoogarah9349 5 років тому

    I need data for my repeated measures dissertation that has not been analysed using repeated measures

  • @WmHenry95
    @WmHenry95 13 років тому

    Brilliant! This is exactly what I was looking for.

  • @rupanataraj
    @rupanataraj 11 років тому

    Well you have certainly helped me beyond words. thanks thanks thanks!

  • @shivangisrivastava1123
    @shivangisrivastava1123 2 роки тому

    Wow. I understood in 9 minutes what I couldn't in an hour in class.

  • @filmdude007
    @filmdude007 7 років тому +1

    How did you get 98.67? following your exact word there is no way to get that figure

    • @filmdude007
      @filmdude007 7 років тому +1

      Upon further research, 57, 47 & 21 should be each individually squared and divided by 7 individually. then that total is subtracted. The equation in the picture is misleading.

    • @harrisking8091
      @harrisking8091 2 роки тому

      @@filmdude007 THANK YOU SO MUCH! I was about to give up but then I saw your comment from 5 years ago, you just saved me and my grade. I sat here for 30mins typing the problem into the calculator and couldn’t get the right answer, but now I can because of this comment! Thank you so much!

  • @gsm9v
    @gsm9v 12 років тому +1

    great, thanks! would like to hear about the post-hoc tests too!

  • @malikasingz
    @malikasingz 11 років тому

    Thank you! Everything else is computer inputs which no one needs!

  • @cliffordvictor3602
    @cliffordvictor3602 5 років тому

    Thank you for making this understandable and your one laugh in between disturbed my friend so much so according to her demand show your face also sometimes

  • @alinasrallah5496
    @alinasrallah5496 3 роки тому

    Hello, thank you alot for this clear explanation. Please could you tell me which is the best posthoc test for the repeated measures ANOVA and what is the rule of HSD or scheffe in this case?

  • @yangcao3724
    @yangcao3724 4 роки тому

    That was super clear and helpful! Thank you soooo much!!!

  • @drtaskingunes
    @drtaskingunes 4 роки тому

    Hi! In the series the subjects divided into two groups as patient and control, I want to analyse the continuous variables measured in 7 different times. And I want to ask which test I need to choose to analyse these :
    1. Does the temporal difference of control significant in itself?
    2.Does the temporal difference of patients significant in itself?
    3. Does time course between patients and control significant?
    Thanks a lot for answers..

  • @arthurmaxs8
    @arthurmaxs8 4 роки тому

    Thanks man, this video help-me! I like your video design model.

  • @chalenegirl1
    @chalenegirl1 11 років тому +1

    What post hoc tests would u do?

  • @karimaabdulrahim1236
    @karimaabdulrahim1236 7 років тому

    For the example you provided in the beginning, How would I know what statistical design I should use? when I read it I thought I will use repeated measure t-test.

  • @elbnderi
    @elbnderi 14 років тому

    Splendid!
    Thank you very much for the explanation..

  • @Leonor1990vdb
    @Leonor1990vdb 11 років тому +6

    haha F-table.. ok.. statistics is affecting my brain and humor.. Wish me luck tomorrow when I have my statistics exam

  • @the-infofreak
    @the-infofreak 2 роки тому

    shouldn't the sum of all df be equal to df total

  • @ziauddinquvanch7092
    @ziauddinquvanch7092 5 років тому

    A very good explanation. thank you

  • @caramacisaac
    @caramacisaac 11 років тому

    Hi what if there are hundreds of subjects.. how would you calculate T^2 in the SS formula.. is there an alternate formula for the Sum of squares for the situation?

    • @Tomahawk1999
      @Tomahawk1999 7 років тому

      honey they use something known as a puter which you use to browse facebook and gossip sites to do the calculation when there are hundreds of subjects... sighs

  • @omariodutreize
    @omariodutreize 11 років тому

    Thank you . It's a very good explanation .

  • @billieboi
    @billieboi Рік тому

    Holy fxxking shit it's been 5 years now I finally got it good lord

  • @ykbwhd
    @ykbwhd 10 років тому

    how did you get 98.67?

  • @TriadAgone
    @TriadAgone 8 років тому +1

    shout outs for helping me not fail when my prof decides to cancel lectures (y)

  • @Lolertii
    @Lolertii 11 років тому +2

    Thank you so much! It helped a lot! :)
    Just one thing, you talk a little bit too fast. Other than that, excellent work

  • @elijumalon6125
    @elijumalon6125 7 років тому +2

    HEEEEEELP PLEASE
    I got negative result using online repeated measures calculator

  • @sohailahmed7283
    @sohailahmed7283 5 років тому

    Nice explanation

  • @joanafialho5832
    @joanafialho5832 12 років тому

    You are my statistic man duddeee =) Im gonna graduate only because of you*

  • @TheBernFactor
    @TheBernFactor 12 років тому +1

    RP Business Stats brought me here!

  • @rong6968
    @rong6968 3 роки тому

    This is so complex compared to the common 1 way anova

  • @raf47
    @raf47 12 років тому

    Excelent video, thanks ;)

  • @jeusmallari8555
    @jeusmallari8555 6 років тому

    i really hate research, but still, thank you for this wonderful information!

  • @mkhan045
    @mkhan045 10 років тому

    just awesome

  • @krishnayedage4209
    @krishnayedage4209 Рік тому

    thanks

  • @pbjohnny2201
    @pbjohnny2201 6 років тому

    DAAAAAAM where an I get this drug that has an F statistic of 200???

  • @danielochieng7204
    @danielochieng7204 7 років тому

    the stuff are more helpfull