This Is What JWST Saw in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 172

  • @billbinnings4347
    @billbinnings4347 Рік тому +22

    If JWST is looking for intelligent life, make sure it is pointed AWAY from Earth.

    • @theshadow3001
      @theshadow3001 6 місяців тому +5

      Such wisdom

    • @arkofnight
      @arkofnight 2 місяці тому +1

      Wow , jwst is a great device even though it was made by non intelligent life.

    • @billbinnings4347
      @billbinnings4347 Місяць тому

      @arkofnight Our inability to avoid repeating history is astounding....yes, kudos to humanity for building the JWST as the greatest among us strive to know the universe. Creating population checks using lab designed diseases and better weapons to wipe out geopolitical enemies is a bit "misguided", non??

    • @tomfitzpatrick737
      @tomfitzpatrick737 Місяць тому +1

      Ha ha , no doubt!

    • @Floppa_raven
      @Floppa_raven 15 днів тому

      Who points a telescope at the earth anyways, u tried to make sense but it didn't work out very well. Ur not so intelligent either 😂😂😂

  • @jeffjames4064
    @jeffjames4064 Рік тому +9

    Just when I could start to wrap my brain around Hubbell's images, jwst comes along. Mind blown.

  • @debbiehenri345
    @debbiehenri345 Рік тому +33

    You know, this image really blows your mind, trying to think how many stars all these galaxies contain.
    There really has to be 'somebody' else out there, hasn't there?

    • @ChrisPattisonCosmo
      @ChrisPattisonCosmo  Рік тому +7

      I totally agree, would be shocked if we were truly alone!

    • @jimskirtt5717
      @jimskirtt5717 Рік тому +6

      Well, life may be common, but intelligence is just going to be extremely rare. Just think about Earth. We are by far the most intelligent species - a world away from the nearest intelligence, chimps. And for life to evolve beyond simple organisms is truly extraordinary. Our planet is tilted, giving us seasons, spins, has a moon which gives us tides, is just the right distance from a star, has been blessed with mammals, and has survived cataclysms - meaning that our climate system responds to perturbations with negative feedbacks (oh, yes!). We must be extraordinarily rare. And of course, we haven't wiped ourselves out, yet. For intelligent life to get to this stage takes billions of years, because stars have to live their lives and go supernova to give us the heavier elements. If there is any intelligent life out there, it may even be (in evolutionary terms) behind us. We may be the only intelligent life in the Universe, or we may be the most advanced!

    • @1337Ox
      @1337Ox Рік тому +3

      @@jimskirtt5717 I remember I used to tell myself that there absolutely has be life somewhere, intelligent life, maybe even more intelligent than us! But later I realised what everything must have happened and played in our favor for us to be here as we are now. Yes the universe is unimaginably huge, but now I think that the chance for intelligent life to evolve to such a point, is still very rare to happen. We really might be the only ones, on this little tiny planet for a fraction of time...

    • @jimskirtt5717
      @jimskirtt5717 Рік тому +1

      @@1337Ox
      But you believe in the god hypothesis? That's up to you, of course, but just think...what if there are trillions, and trillions, and trillions of universes? There would be one where humans evolve. Douglas Adams put it best (paraphrasing): Image a puddle of water (if water could think!) thinking how lucky it was to find a pothole which fitted it exactly.

    • @bili4591
      @bili4591 Рік тому

      @@jimskirtt5717 « image a puddle of water ( if water could think ) thinking how lucky it was to find a pothole which fitted it exactly »
      I just want to do a « small » reminder of some things in a ( for example ) human body.
      organization of atoms resulting in a code ( DNA ) that inform and guide to place each molecules in a order that build a system that should catch toxic charged materials, charged chemicals, toxins, poison, heavy metals which will necessarily be encountered in food present in the environment, and which short-circuit the formation of ATP that no longer allow the cells of any fabric layer of any organ to have cellular activity and therefore stop activity, coma, appearance of reversible then irreversible damage to the cell (death),
      organization of atoms resulting in a code that orders and guides the stacking of atoms (constituting the matter that surrounds you, and also constitutes your environment, your furniture), resulting in a system that would prevent circulation of and inactivate the "reactive oxygen species", « ROS » which causes the inevitable cancers, and the disruption of the membranes of the cells of the organs (needed for vital activities) of the organism and leads to death,
      and parallel system which detects and catches the unique three-dimensional shapes and unique chemical composition of parasites encountered in the environment (bacteria) and circulating in the piping system for the transport of the energy source, bacteria multiplying, clinging to the surfaces of living units (cells of the organism) and destroy their plasma membranes by the release of toxins, and steal their resources glucose, ATP, living only to infect and destroy, communicating their resistance against the body's defense system .
      which form 3 of the multiple functions of the "liver"
      I continue with something
      The large code (DNA) formed by the agglomeration of atoms which guides the stacking of molecules (with physico-chemical properties which are specific to each other such as alkalinity, acidity, positive and negative charges, hydrophilic, hydrophobic and others) and which by their distance between them (according to the order of their placement) repel and attract each other more or less strongly and take a form also dependent on the timing of the placement of each because a local three-dimensional form x will induce interactions with the succeeding local three-dimensional form which will be different than if it adopted a local three-dimensional form y, which finally leads by cascade, to the changes of the final three-dimensional shape.
      and the whole forming giant molecular machines which once agglomerate by hundreds form other cells and according to the signaling signals indicating the location of each thing (at a certain stage of the development of the embryo) guide according to other portion of this great code (that atoms forms ), the location of these specialized cells in the nose.
      cells which form a system which, by recognizing the geometric shapes of the volatile molecules released by the bacteria, indicate their presence, specific cells which among the others have their addressing of their nervous portion which points to specific areas of the centers of the brain of smell which cause disgust and cause the organism to flee.
      and according to another portion of the code forms cells placed on the tongue and recognizes the geometric shape and chemical composition of the membranes of bacteria and spores, and toxic materials, and which among others have their addressing of their nerve portion which points to specific areas of the brain's taste centers and cause disgust, strong bitter taste and cause the organism to don’t eat
      while the cells placed in the nose and tongue which recognize the geometric shapes and chemical compositions of the volatile and fixed molecules emitted and constituents the sources of vitamins, minerals, simple and complex sugar, fatty acids and essential amino acids which allow the construction of which maintains the different cellular activity, repair, multiply, rebuild the proteins which degrade over time, source of energy which are profitable and allow the life of the organism,
      have their addressing of their nerve portion which points to specific areas of the taste and smell centers of the brain and cause pleasure, attraction.
      Hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, sodium, magnesium, sulphide, silicon, phosphorus, chlorine, potassium, calcium, nickel, cobalt, iron, copper, zinc, iodine, molybdenum
      that make up each building and bins and cable you pass by and that have come together and organized to answers the needs of each of the different organisms that they will form based on their environment (cold, hot, dry, humidity, height, water, pressure, predator, prey, day-night cycle duration, etc.
      and the mechanisms they form continue to outpace us,
      it all just depends on the code, now
      Does a code improve over time and answers the different specific needs of different organizations just over time?
      so it wouldn't be surprising to place a math test and wait until after 10 billion years the atoms have finished to forming a pen or whatever and put to the test all the correct answers.
      I prefer to believe that the agglomeration of all this is the fruit of a perfectly learned intelligence, and moreover who can master perfectly quantum mechanics as well if not its creator.
      some animals have some quantum-scale sensitive proteins for magnetism that can maintain quantum entanglement for 20 micro-secondes more than the latest laboratory system, some plants have some proteins that work through quantum effects, humans also have proteins in the electron transport complex.

  • @davidpescod7573
    @davidpescod7573 Рік тому +14

    Absolutely stunning, Chris. The JWST image taken in less than a day! It will be truly mind boggling to see what a much deeper image will reveal? I’m still bemused by the apparent amount of matter which has formed and coalesced into galaxies in such a short time. Many thanks as always

  • @kasuha
    @kasuha Рік тому +4

    What caught my attention were a few bright deep red spots that can't be really seen in Hubble image. They may have tried to recreate Hubble image but JWST's true potential peeks through that anyway.

  • @schnittmagier5515
    @schnittmagier5515 Рік тому +7

    Now I am really looking forward for the first JWST 10+ Day Deep Field image. I imagine it to look like a grainy picture with seemingly endless and never before seen baby galaxies, all of them so far way that they are only one or two pixels wide. And the currently visible Objects will turn into overexposed white spots.

    • @jonathanleonard1152
      @jonathanleonard1152 Рік тому

      It is probably already in the works. It is a series of photos, not one long shot. This is done to reduce the noise level.

  • @joemel2
    @joemel2 Рік тому +6

    The universe really is just mind bogglingly, ridiculously, incomprehensibly massive! Like you try thinking about it and just can't even come close to wrapping your mind around it, and that's awesome!

    • @kevinlatham5661
      @kevinlatham5661 Рік тому

      our primate brain is easily overwhelmed. our reason has to default to emotion when confronted. some go to poetry or music others to religion and denial.

    • @jc4evur661
      @jc4evur661 Рік тому

      @@kevinlatham5661 Denial comes in many forms...so does justification

    • @josephfacey2596
      @josephfacey2596 5 місяців тому

      Here is one for you. They say the science of the small is smaller than the science of the biggest of the big is big. Crazy. Example: If you took the smallest theorized particle and made it 1 meter long, an atom would be larger than the universe. True????

  • @ExploringNew1
    @ExploringNew1 Рік тому +2

    4:30 you can look behind those videos in you're on mobile by swiping down a little bit and then swiping up without taking your finger off of the screen. You'll be able to see behind as long as you keep your hand on the screen

  • @RudieVissenberg
    @RudieVissenberg Рік тому +6

    What a great choice to use Beethoven's 7th

    • @ChrisPattisonCosmo
      @ChrisPattisonCosmo  Рік тому

      Thanks! Fraser is a legend of the game, would love to work with him in the future!

  • @Deploracle
    @Deploracle Рік тому +2

    Such pretty pictures of fractals ...

  • @T800-theRealOne
    @T800-theRealOne Рік тому +3

    Thanks for another cool video, bro. I love the content. Keep it up.

  • @maxplank4083
    @maxplank4083 Рік тому +6

    Unbelievable In your wildest dreams

  • @darrinsiberia
    @darrinsiberia 7 днів тому

    It's like being a prisoner. Looking out your cell window seeing trees clouds and hillsides. But you'll never be able to go to any of them.

  • @MrSmithwayne
    @MrSmithwayne Місяць тому

    I just get blown away seeing images like that but what really makes me think on this is no matter how far we peer back we keep seeing more and more lights farther out. They say that the big bang happened 13.7 billion years ago but according to this image and the JWST one there is no end to the galaxies so how the hell can they say the big bang happened at that time scale or even at all. This is something that has always bothered me about the deep field scans.

  • @user-wb3uc4oe2b
    @user-wb3uc4oe2b 3 місяці тому

    Great video thankyou , Great place to explore !

  • @matgeezer2094
    @matgeezer2094 Рік тому

    Really good description of a couple of important images

  • @vudusid8717
    @vudusid8717 Рік тому +1

    I actually prefer the hubble udf. I have had it as my wallpaper for many years. Really looking forward to see a longer exposure from JWST tho.

  • @michman2
    @michman2 6 місяців тому

    The scientist that was curious about what would be seen in the small dark area had to fight for the time on Hubble. Finally, his request was granted and it proved to be one of the most important photos taken by Hubble.
    Sometimes, you have to assert yourself.

  • @TheSaintFrenzy
    @TheSaintFrenzy Рік тому +1

    Hubble was amazing for it's time and still holds up so well.
    I just think we can't always compare Webb to it. It's far more advanced. Like comparing a well made VCR to the streaming services to our smartphones and smart-tv's.

  • @myutube5882
    @myutube5882 5 місяців тому

    I love that you used Beethoven's 7th Symphony as your background music for this!

  • @kjwong4730
    @kjwong4730 Рік тому

    Can’t look at this imagine and be forever changed by it, as it was narrated in the original Hubble deep field video many yrs ago

  • @alphalunamare
    @alphalunamare Рік тому

    Stunning! good choice of music to :-)

  • @UnlockedANDunleashed
    @UnlockedANDunleashed Рік тому +1

    nice touch on the music

  • @manoo422
    @manoo422 Рік тому +2

    Its not as detailed as the hubble image but I like to see a 10 day exposure from JWST of this or more interestingly 180 degs from it...!

  • @vancemorton1081
    @vancemorton1081 Рік тому

    The numbers are so vast ,,,it’s simply amazing and spectacular inspirational and some what emotional,,

  • @barry_g8443
    @barry_g8443 Рік тому

    Amazing images, thanks.

  • @adonistopofmen2571
    @adonistopofmen2571 11 місяців тому

    Great images ...

  • @amramjose
    @amramjose Рік тому +3

    These deep field images never fail to make me feel "very small" indeed. The scale of what is visible is beyond comprehension, and implies a nearly infinite universe...

    • @calculator1841
      @calculator1841 Рік тому

      How does it feel to be a usefull idiot for the global cabal? You people are easily pointed out with the corrupt regime flag....

  • @Rafaga777
    @Rafaga777 Рік тому

    Very impressive. Thanks for this video.

  • @dkk1404
    @dkk1404 Рік тому

    Wish my eyes were that good

  • @ComeonmenID10T
    @ComeonmenID10T Рік тому

    interesting that some Galaxys in the Hubble and in the Web are blueish in color, meaning they are coming in our direction ( blue / red shift ), while others are very much redish meaning they float away from us

  • @ericwhitehead6451
    @ericwhitehead6451 Рік тому

    I wonder if I'm staring back at myself in these photo's?

  • @DoubleDoubleWithOnions
    @DoubleDoubleWithOnions Рік тому +1

    They didn't seem to move very far since Hubbles shot.

    • @-MaXuS-
      @-MaXuS- Рік тому +2

      I have to ask. You’re joking right? ✌️

    • @Brenton-xc2fg
      @Brenton-xc2fg Місяць тому

      did you even watch the video?

  • @witherbossbros1157
    @witherbossbros1157 Рік тому +1

    It's not really about which is better. The two telescopes provide different image information. Some galaxies' features are clearer in the Hubble, some are better in the JWST.

  • @Davemmmason
    @Davemmmason Рік тому

    Galaxies have been forming forever, no beginning no end

  • @procactus9109
    @procactus9109 8 місяців тому

    Turning off annotations in UA-cam gives you a cleaner more personal experience with it... Don't let other people or UA-cam control what you watch. Look after your recommendations and it's a lot better experience.

  • @tigerwarsaw99
    @tigerwarsaw99 Рік тому +3

    So if we kept taking photos of random positions in the sky we would keep seeing thousands more galaxies?

    • @ChrisPattisonCosmo
      @ChrisPattisonCosmo  Рік тому +2

      Yes, exactly! :) Unless there is some other bright object in the way, we would see galaxies in any direction!

    • @greatfullded
      @greatfullded Рік тому +1

      Here is my take on that.. take JWST deep field image and look at the farthest galaxy.. I would bet the farm if we could put the JWST in that or near that galaxy and point it beyond it i bet there would be Trillions more Galaxies and so much intresting wonders of the impossible.

    • @tigerwarsaw99
      @tigerwarsaw99 Рік тому

      @@greatfullded infinite universe 👍 got it

    • @greatfullded
      @greatfullded Рік тому +1

      @@tigerwarsaw99 Yep as buzz light-year from toy story would say infinity and beyond

  • @shantanujoshi1097
    @shantanujoshi1097 2 місяці тому

    Let's not forget that all of this is within the one millionth patch of the sky 😅😅😅

  • @johnishikawa2200
    @johnishikawa2200 9 місяців тому

    We are seeing those galaxies as they were millions , and hundreds of millions of years ago , and even billions of years ago . In those images , what we are looking at are countless planets , millions of TRILLIONS of worlds . So what could be happening RIGHT NOW on tens of millions of those worlds , what dramas are going on involving sentient beings like us who have developed technology , plus or minus perhaps thousands of years of development , and maybe so unlike us in appearance , we can never know . But it is fun for me to ponder such things whenever I look at images like these , produced by the amazing technology that humans have available now , technology which allows us to take in these spectacular images . We are lucky to live in a time on our own world when we can know that so much exists beyond it , and that we will never be able to understand very much of it , but that so much IS being learned about .

  • @BrotherMichaeloftheCross
    @BrotherMichaeloftheCross Рік тому

    It seems clear to me that the universe appeared instantly at one time, fully formed galazies and all.

    • @leftpastsaturn67
      @leftpastsaturn67 Рік тому +3

      If that 'seems clear' to you, then you aren't being intellectually or emotionally honest with yourself.

  • @tuliolopez9749
    @tuliolopez9749 Рік тому

    It’s hard to keep thinking that life is unique to our planet. It’s just a matter of time before we find evidence of life elsewhere.

  • @herbertberger7711
    @herbertberger7711 Рік тому

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @GreenDistantStar
    @GreenDistantStar Рік тому +1

    When you are looking up at the night sky, this image represents about as much sky-space as the end of a pin held at arm's length. The universe is titanic, beyond our ability to truly conceive.

    • @greatfullded
      @greatfullded Рік тому +1

      What i think is a intresting thought is there are Billions or Trillions of so called individual life prolly looking up at us.. well where they are we are prolly just a faint wite star or with a Very Strong Telescope you can see our galaxy, just think we are just as courious as the next and I bet they are doing exactly what you do looking up at the night sky.

  • @bilalyusaf7822
    @bilalyusaf7822 Рік тому

    Excellent 👍

  • @ML-xx5mj
    @ML-xx5mj Рік тому

    I would like to see this startin to slowly zoom from Earth as you can see the sky with your own eyes. Otherwise you can’t realize the scale.
    Then I could blow more minds showing it to my friends.
    Thanks

  • @damanifesto
    @damanifesto Рік тому

    James Webb. Say it. SAY IT!

  • @stephenking8754
    @stephenking8754 Рік тому

    Yes very good again chris 🚀🛰🛰🌙🌞🌞

  • @abvmoose87
    @abvmoose87 Рік тому

    Lol, I, seriously. I can't fathom how your mind is blown by this. I do genuinely hope that we do get to see new incredibly more detailed images from JWST but Im starting to get a bit skeptical to all this. We don't even have raw video of Earth from space.

    • @leftpastsaturn67
      @leftpastsaturn67 Рік тому

      What do you need 'raw video of earth from space' for exactly?

  • @kohtalainenalias
    @kohtalainenalias Рік тому

    But we have no way of knowing how those galaxies look now?

  • @patrickmchargue7122
    @patrickmchargue7122 Рік тому

    This surprised everyone, including my mom.

  • @OSRSylent_1
    @OSRSylent_1 Рік тому

    people: "wE aRe ThE AlOnE iN tHe UnIVeRse"

  • @quistador7
    @quistador7 Рік тому +2

    You should've added like 30 seconds of black screen to the end of your video, that way the stupid cards go there and not on the image

  • @drkingslend
    @drkingslend Рік тому +1

    Why is it blue shifted, why isnt it violet shifted?

  • @christophmessner6450
    @christophmessner6450 2 місяці тому

    When JWST sees a galaxy 13 billion lightyears away and then look into the opposite direction and also sees a galaxy 13 lifhtyears away, and it both sees them as they were when the universe was as only 0.8 billion years old, how come they look 26 billion lifhtyears apart from each other when the universe could only be maximum 1.6 billion lifhtyears in diameter?

  • @greggweber9967
    @greggweber9967 Рік тому +1

    Could they render the same colors that match in frequency with each other in colors that match each other, and those that are only seen in Hubble Or Webb in other colors? Red is red in both images.

    • @x88868
      @x88868 11 місяців тому

      English, please. Thank you.

  • @elcheapo9444
    @elcheapo9444 Рік тому

    Looking at this I realise how trivial and insignificant my own life is.

    • @-Gingecringe-
      @-Gingecringe- 22 дні тому

      No, it’s amazing! Despite all of these lifeless galaxies, we are the ones who took this image

  • @allenuic
    @allenuic Рік тому

    If Hubble Space Telescope is not pronounced HST, then James Webb Space Telescope is not just JWST.

  • @enrique88005
    @enrique88005 Рік тому

    What's the music in the background?
    I know it just not the name

  • @user-cw4rp9xg5o
    @user-cw4rp9xg5o 9 місяців тому

    They are called heavens.

  • @LuvHrtZ
    @LuvHrtZ Рік тому

    The JWST images appear to contain a lot of 'noise' that isn't in the Hubble images, and nobody is mentioning it.

    • @CZ2128DELTA1
      @CZ2128DELTA1 Рік тому +1

      Maybe they just wanted to show the public how fast JWST can do a deep field image and in this image they didn't even bother to remove the noise. I think they just merged the images together and put them out there for the public to see without any processing which is amazing as it demonstrates the potential of JWST being able to do what hubble does in 1/10 the time.

  • @NetanyahooWarCriminal
    @NetanyahooWarCriminal Рік тому

    what a shame for all that to exist if its only us to witness it 😢

  • @eronavbj
    @eronavbj Рік тому +1

    Sorry, but my non-scientific background can discern nothing in this comparison to cause me to gasp. I personally would have the JWST concentrate on our own galaxy. Even that perspective would be too enormous, locating solar systems so distant that eventual contact/exploration would be impossible.

  • @Pegasus4213
    @Pegasus4213 Рік тому +1

    I wonder what evidence these images show that convinces science that the Big Bang theory still makes sense? I would think it possible that the expansion is due to different processes. If we increase the size and efficiency further and further what will we see, or what do we expect to see that validates the BB? It just kooks like more of the same to me!

  • @Struggle.Snuggles
    @Struggle.Snuggles Рік тому

    I know it sounds weird to say this, but am I the only one who hates how when people describe what the JWST can do vs the HST.
    Especially in this video as its pointed out, the JWST did it in one day, compared to Hubbles many days needed.
    Like no shit, its a modern scope that is more advanced then a scope from the early 90s.

  • @blackholeentry3489
    @blackholeentry3489 Рік тому +1

    My guess is Jehovah Witnesses get really excited about this as there are a lot of future doors to knock on!

  • @LostinMIA
    @LostinMIA Рік тому

    I always suspected there were tons of galaxys and stars so the Hubble match photo didn't impress me. I'm still waiting for the image that tells us we are not alone. That is the most important reason they made the JWST. Unfortunately I don't think they will ever tell us everything they find, remember its owned by our government.

  • @OregonDARRYL
    @OregonDARRYL 2 місяці тому

    But what about an even LONGER exposure? Isn't the point to see into the dark further? Do the TEN day exposure... Come ON, Man!

  • @thesupremegenius
    @thesupremegenius Рік тому

    What if that furthest galaxy was looking back commenting that our galaxy was the furthest known galaxy. Our place in the universe has no value.

  • @what9621
    @what9621 Рік тому +1

    This is all well and good but I wanted to see something mind blowing but nothing.

  • @NOT_NativeEN_Speaker
    @NOT_NativeEN_Speaker Рік тому

    💖💖💖

  • @mikejawid9769
    @mikejawid9769 Рік тому

    come on, i need a 20 day exposure with jwst and as deep as possible. come on.

  • @robertcerins
    @robertcerins Рік тому

    Why is there no selfie camera on the Hubble showing real video of earth? You could get rid of the fake ones you show us.

  • @mountuplikeaneagle
    @mountuplikeaneagle 4 місяці тому

    That's only the second heaven, God's throne is past that.
    There are three heavens, the first heaven is our atmosphere and including the sun and the moon, the second is what we call the universe or space. The third heaven is paradise where God Almighty's throne is located.

  • @alexciocca4451
    @alexciocca4451 Рік тому

    It’s nice but what good is it what was the $$ cost of this pix I think it’s fascinating but a waste of time and $ a 10 B $ toy to play with wish I had one

  • @louisvega1834
    @louisvega1834 Рік тому +1

    Jwst saw, the, glory of God, and his handy works!.🕵😇

    • @markb3786
      @markb3786 Рік тому

      Yes! Praise Shivakamini Somakandarkram !

    • @louisvega1834
      @louisvega1834 Рік тому

      @@markb3786 who is that?.

    • @louisvega1834
      @louisvega1834 Рік тому

      @Get Zappéd 1974 tell that one to the creator on judgement day, I'm sure he will get a good laugh!..

    • @leftpastsaturn67
      @leftpastsaturn67 Рік тому

      @@louisvega1834 Which 'creator' out of the countless thousands currently worshipped?

    • @louisvega1834
      @louisvega1834 Рік тому

      @@leftpastsaturn67 only one I know, "the GOD of abraham, Issac, and jacob, the king of kings, and the Lord of lords, JESUS CHRIST!"..

  • @rogercoziol2768
    @rogercoziol2768 Рік тому

    Would have been more incredible without music. What is the point of putting music?

  • @kamleshgjain2811
    @kamleshgjain2811 Рік тому

    🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @bjornfleuren
    @bjornfleuren Рік тому +1

    What in the world, There must be alien life!

    • @bjornfleuren
      @bjornfleuren Рік тому

      What’s scarier, life or no life.

  • @joetamaccio9475
    @joetamaccio9475 Рік тому +2

    Galaxies don’t form . They are created by G O D

  • @Hhbdr
    @Hhbdr Рік тому

    Hubbles is better

  • @danielmorris4676
    @danielmorris4676 Рік тому

    It's not "four hundred orbits of the world"; rather, it's four hundred revolutions of the earth!, the duration of Hubble's exposure time of this image. Get your facts straight. BTW, 400 orbits of the earth would equal 400 years of time.

    • @T800-theRealOne
      @T800-theRealOne Рік тому +3

      It's neither. It's 400 rotations of the Earth. A revolution of any celestial object is the same as the orbital period. They're synonyms. Get your facts straight.

    • @TheDanEdwards
      @TheDanEdwards Рік тому +5

      The HST is in orbit around the Earth. It takes approximately 95 minutes for the telescope to make one orbit. Sor 400 orbits times 95 minutes.

    • @Jez2008UK
      @Jez2008UK Рік тому +4

      I'm not even an astronomer, just a regular person in awe of our Universe and I understood what was being said in the video. However, I didn't understand your point, and seeing as everyone before me disagrees with you I guess you must be talking nonsense.....

    • @_Rustodian
      @_Rustodian Рік тому

      Don't be daft, Dan. It was quite clear what the video said, especially when the Hubble image took just over 11 days of exposure time to create.

  • @abvmoose87
    @abvmoose87 Рік тому

    Wth, talk about underwelming. Tax payers paid for it so it could see more detail than before, not the same thing. Would have been a better demonstration if it zoomed in on a small patch of the area thats in tve hibble image an zoomed in a couple of times to reveal tvis increased detail that was the purpose of this whole thing!