The total theory or whatever there's a portal in the ocean that goes back to earth if you know what I mean earth is actually in some weird ball but it's flat pyramid like an iceberg
@GC2Major_Tom there's a portal in the ocean that goes on forever why not? The earth is actually a flattened curved iceberg in a quantum ball... the edges are contained and impossible to travel to.
Hi there! Hydrographic Surveyor/Marine Geophysicist here. Couple of things I'd like to clear up: 1.5km resolution is the resolution we have in the centre of the Pacific. The important areas, and by that I mean continental shelves, are often at 20cm resolution due to the combined work of Oil and Gas, Renewables, Researchers and cable routers. Further more, the only way we really scan the seabed is by Multibeam Echosounders (MBES for short). Now mathematically, data quality from these reduce with distance as they fire a wedge perpendicular to the vessel. The deeper you go, the further that swath has to go. The beams scatter and hence you end up with a handful of soundings per 100m. Hence why the only way to increase resolution is to decrease the swath width, and collect at a slower rate, or drop the altitude of the MBES using ROV, AUV, which move slower than surface vessels
Hydrographer here as well. A big problem is that that data isn't very public from a lot of sources that have good high resolution data. If the oil and gas industry would share more of their data publicly, we'd have better resolution for the public, and that 20cm resolution in under 200m waters would be seen by a lot more people. But also, the other problem is that the seafloor changes a lot in some places, so it's a never ending challenge to map.
In Nordic countries in Scandinavia, this is not the case. There is a company called Olex that sells seafloor map data. This is very popular, especially on fishing vessels that require relatively accurate seafloor maps. The way it works is that they gather data from sonars on all boats where it is installed and compile this data. We have had this on one of our boats for at least 10 years. However, it recently came to light that this has been very unfortunate as this data is something that Russia has had unrestricted access to, resulting in highly detailed maps of the seafloor around, for example, Norway and military sea installations.
Don't be paranoid. Every country (including russia) has extensive public gps data about their shores. You can see at least 5939 different maps just for russia by searching on google
Crowdsourcing is awesome, but the video is talking about the ocean floor where almost no ships have ever been to. The Pacific ocean is huge and travelling to every square kilometre is a tedious task.
@Raiyven79 the fact you even put a whole number is bold. I going to take a guess that it's 0.002 percent are even known of. Now graphed 0.0002. Roughly 20% of the ocean floor has even been mapped!
@@Cool-Random-Human hmmmm, that's a good one, buty weren't they under the ocean via a portal in PR?? I'm thinking like the Abyss.... there's been sightings by submarine crews and a possible conflict with an international sub.
As a geophysics student I’m surprised that we aren’t doing enough to explore the ocean and yes the technology isn’t that advanced yet but we still can gather more details with technologies we have right now like seismic exploration
I think she fucked up and compared the Mars DEM resolution to the Earth's surface DEM instead of the ocean bathymetry. Mars: 5 m × 5 m = 25 m^2 Earth surface: 0.3 m × 0.3 m = 0.09 m^2 25/0.09 = 278 ≈ 300
Oh nevermind she must've just been making a linear comparison instead of an areal comparison. 1500/5 = 300. I agree with you though, you should be comparing areas and not linear dimensions.
Something I was told is that we do know what most of the unexplored ocean contains. The thing is that it’s almost completely empty swaths of seafloor containing almost nothing of interest. So until now scientists had no reason to check it out, as it would have been too expensive for very little gain.
@@ralucapop1467 well coral reefs are bleached and species are dying bc of fishing nets, and massive garbage patches etc so idk I'd say we have. The ocean is resilient I will agree. I don't want it's life to be sucked dry, but it is being drained. Luckily it is inhabitable by us so at least (hopefully) we wont be building infastructure down there
Might have something to do with the ufos that routinely enter and exit the ocean. With CENTURIES of documented sightings of these things, it might be that surveying the ocean is being discouraged from on high. Just a thought.
@keyboardsmash42 from the diaries of Christopher Columbus, the department of the Navy, countless merchant reports, the Vatican ect. These accounts numerous and well known.
@@darththc christopher colombus just saw a light in the sky (theorized to be a meteorite), and the navy just saw something they couldn’t identify. im not saying ufos are definitely fake but these sources aren’t proof.
It's always better when we don't know things. Anything we find down there will be exploited and destroyed before we ever know how important it was to leave it alone.
That's why I hate people who go "too late to explore the world, too early to explore the universe" Then when you bring up exploring the ocean, they suddenly realize they have a Netflix show to binge.
Most of those people would've stayed in their villages anyways! It takes either being insane, arrogance, ignorance, or balls of steel to explore the unknown.
I want to build a deep underwater robot just for fun, but I realized that I’m probably not going to get a signal from so deep, and making it an autonomous AI is tedious and boring. I’ll stick with flying things
Not seeing or knowing what's beneath me must be one of my biggest fears. Just imagining swimming in the middle of the Atlantic is sending down shivers down my spine.
I’ve heard people make the argument that we know more about the oceans than the moon and mars just there is so much to know that there is still vastly more we can’t even fathom
I remember watching Planet Earth’s Ocean episode and one of my buddies being like, “Dude look at that thing! That’s a fuckin alien! If that thing was coming at you in the air you’d be like, ‘Ahhhhhhh!!!!” Lol. So true.
The bottom of the ocean is a less hospitable place than the vacuum of space. In many aspects yes, a spaceship is easier to build than a submarine. A spaceship must be designed to contain roughly one atmosphere of pressure whereas a submarine must be built to withstand many hundreds of atmospheres. You could survive exposure to a vacuum, but you could not survive exposure at the bottom of the ocean.
@@tahyang I have to disagree. But I feel like I could post a complete essay about that topic and I wouldnt convince you. Thats okay, and I wont try it. So... have a nice day. 🙂
My job is to maintain and fix the oceanographic hand hydrographic survey equipment on ships. There is and has been technology around for a long time to map seabed but its very expensive business. Firstly, Its only really done when someone or company has a motivation to pay for it- ie they think there is oil etc there, they want to construct something like an oil pipeline, run a telecoms cable, install a renewable energy generator like wind turbine or tidal turbines etc. Second is that the deeper the water the more problematic, expensive and complicated it becomes to do. Sound waves are whats used and unlike in air where we use electromagnetic and lightwaves , sound takes noticeable time to travel even in water so in deeper water it introducing delays and its extra complication. Also time taken to get equipment deployed to depth increases a lot and its all extra costs 3rd problem is that the seabed changes- its like sand dunes in the desert, but on a smaller scale. Things move, its dynamic. Change might not be as big as in desert but in areas where the information on the seabed is required its often checked regularly because changes occur, naturally and also due to fishing nets getting dragged along. 4th although we can get detailed chart build up to see whats there its done by sound, so you can see whats there in terms of an outline but not detailed to our eyes. Imagine you took a plaster cast of the seabed, you would see the peaks and troughs, depressions (pock marks), rocks, shipwrecks and other things but you would not know detail. What we see is effectively like this. To take photographs would be so time consuming as light doesn’t travel far in water so only a small area can be seen at a time.
There is a common misconception with this statement, it leads you to believe we know more about mars than our own oceans and this is simply not the case . First let's sum up the players, mars being half the size earth which is 71% water, and while we have mapped the surface of Mars we have very little data as to what lay beneath the mars surface, far less than the data we have on the depths of Earth's oceans, in truth the statement that is accurate would be we know very little about the depths of the ocean but even less about cave systems on Mars.
As someone going through a training program to become a deckhand that ends in a 90 day internship with one of the many companies that work with the college, and hoping to get a NOAA internship, this stuff is so fascinating to me. I will never be one of the researchers who maps the ocean, but I may work alongside them, and it would be so cool
That’s because the sun will become a supernova and we realize there are limited benefits for studying the ocean when the only chance for survival is up and away.
Ex hydrographic surveyor here who worked around the SA coast. Remote sensing over large ocean areas is not possible, so as she says, " cartographically water sucks". Oceanographic surveys are tedious and in many ways prohibitively expensive.
First I don’t think it’s NASA thats conducting the research, and secondly it’s simply because of the large technological difficulties getting to the ocean floor because the pressure is so high.
I love this channel. Everyone is so doom and gloom about technology, and even worse, making conspiracies about the future, but you show the bright side.
We’ve had tech to do it for decades… it’s just that said tech (sonar mapping) would have massive negative effects on sea life if we actually went to the trouble of doing it.
I work in an ocean awareness organisation and I am always blown away by how amazing our oceans are. 🌊🦀🐳
Wtf is an "Ocean Awareness" like who tf doesn't know about the ocean??
@@hienable6933 You, because you would know what an ocean awareness organization is.
@@to_ur_heart I know the ocean exists you dummy. Everyone does.
It must be working, because I am aware of oceans.
Why everybody acting like they know everything? Some of y’all don’t know how many countries are where, so don’t go in the ocean
That "Water Sucks" was so personal.
Yeah, I don’t like her style. Pretend to be expert in many areas.
she is 60% water and she do sucks both literally and instinctively
@@waterloowarWhat? That didnt really have to do with the parent comment
@@agereartist3763 I am saying my feeling only. not asking you to agree
@@waterloowarTbh she is better than those Ai based channels who do the exact same but with much less effort.
I gotta say, you're one of the best scientific journalists I've ever seen. Keep up the great work.
You like her looks and make up skills, right?
I do like that but I think her content makes it value@@karolmaczek
@@karolmaczekI need to dissect you under a microscope
@@karolmaczekher content is better than the other brain rot I consume
the title ur looking for is "science communicator"
Natalie Portman's long lost sister
The total theory or whatever there's a portal in the ocean that goes back to earth if you know what I mean earth is actually in some weird ball but it's flat pyramid like an iceberg
@@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine What
@GC2Major_Tom there's a portal in the ocean that goes on forever why not? The earth is actually a flattened curved iceberg in a quantum ball... the edges are contained and impossible to travel to.
@@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine lay off the meth lad
@@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine u ritard
I am studying geology and I can second this.
I am not studying geology or anything related to the ocean and I third it 😂
i'm learning geography so i fourth this
Yooo geological engineering here. Fifth this
I don't know shit about anything but i sixth this.
internet user here and i seventh this
Hi there! Hydrographic Surveyor/Marine Geophysicist here.
Couple of things I'd like to clear up:
1.5km resolution is the resolution we have in the centre of the Pacific. The important areas, and by that I mean continental shelves, are often at 20cm resolution due to the combined work of Oil and Gas, Renewables, Researchers and cable routers.
Further more, the only way we really scan the seabed is by Multibeam Echosounders (MBES for short). Now mathematically, data quality from these reduce with distance as they fire a wedge perpendicular to the vessel. The deeper you go, the further that swath has to go. The beams scatter and hence you end up with a handful of soundings per 100m. Hence why the only way to increase resolution is to decrease the swath width, and collect at a slower rate, or drop the altitude of the MBES using ROV, AUV, which move slower than surface vessels
What is the use of mapping the sea flor? People allways say "we only know 5%" but, as you said, we know the important parts well enough
@@joaopedroandsan2172 well most cable companies like to know if their cable is gonna break where they lay it
Hydrographer here as well. A big problem is that that data isn't very public from a lot of sources that have good high resolution data. If the oil and gas industry would share more of their data publicly, we'd have better resolution for the public, and that 20cm resolution in under 200m waters would be seen by a lot more people.
But also, the other problem is that the seafloor changes a lot in some places, so it's a never ending challenge to map.
@@demonsun When even bedforms are moving 2m a day it's a real headache
Holy yap! Get a publisher.
Thank you Natalie Portman for the update. ❤
🤣
Hahah foreal she’s like her cousin or something fuckin gorgeous
@@DL-df3lgyeah she dated my boyfriend
@@jayus2033yeah i dated your Boyfriend too
@@MAHIM_Kinda_Savage nah
I’ve seen enough monster movies to know this won’t end well…
I'm craving for some action
What if the ocean is mad because the land never waves back?
Cleo, love your content, love your delivery and you are lovely!!
In Nordic countries in Scandinavia, this is not the case. There is a company called Olex that sells seafloor map data. This is very popular, especially on fishing vessels that require relatively accurate seafloor maps. The way it works is that they gather data from sonars on all boats where it is installed and compile this data. We have had this on one of our boats for at least 10 years. However, it recently came to light that this has been very unfortunate as this data is something that Russia has had unrestricted access to, resulting in highly detailed maps of the seafloor around, for example, Norway and military sea installations.
This is seriously not good. The helpful ingenuity became a National Defense liability
Don't be paranoid. Every country (including russia) has extensive public gps data about their shores. You can see at least 5939 different maps just for russia by searching on google
Crowdsourcing is awesome, but the video is talking about the ocean floor where almost no ships have ever been to. The Pacific ocean is huge and travelling to every square kilometre is a tedious task.
cool, didint know about this. Thanksn for the info
Great information ❤️
Would also be interesting to know how many caves are mapped
Doubt it's more than 2%
@@Raiyven79probably wayyy less
we don't even know about 90% of caves
I think it should be more than the oceans
@Raiyven79 the fact you even put a whole number is bold. I going to take a guess that it's 0.002 percent are even known of. Now graphed 0.0002. Roughly 20% of the ocean floor has even been mapped!
Born too early to explore deep space and too late to explore the high seas, but right in time to explore the _low_ seas :D
*goes wading*
Borring
No one asked what your mother says Everytime she looks at you😂@@joaopedroandsan2172
@@joaopedroandsan2172every sea creature down there would like to voice their disagreement
@@escaped_cephalopod discovering lands>discovering sea creatures
Discovering space>discovering sea creatures
Multiple leviathans detected,Are you sure what your doing is worth it?
My brother is a hydrographer / marine biologist / sonar expert for NOAA. This is all he does, map the ocean floor.
Watched your full version very cool ❤😊
that's why the real aliens hide under the oceans
Like pacific rim?
@@Cool-Random-Human hmmmm, that's a good one, buty weren't they under the ocean via a portal in PR?? I'm thinking like the Abyss.... there's been sightings by submarine crews and a possible conflict with an international sub.
If we just drained the oceans and turned them into oil fields and super-highways, we'd have a much easier time mapping them. Just a thought
As a geophysics student I’m surprised that we aren’t doing enough to explore the ocean and yes the technology isn’t that advanced yet but we still can gather more details with technologies we have right now like seismic exploration
What is the point, though? It isn't like the majority of the oceans are filled with life. They are relatively empty.
NASA’s original plan was to explore the ocean, but they stopped because they found something terrifying down there
No. Just no
To travel to space is more attractive to humans than exploring the all same ocean.
If resolution of mars is 5*5=25m^2 and resolution of ocean is 1500*1500=2250000m^2, then it's 90000 times less details, not 300
Exactly and so many people get confused about this.
Exactly. 300^2=90000
I think she fucked up and compared the Mars DEM resolution to the Earth's surface DEM instead of the ocean bathymetry.
Mars: 5 m × 5 m = 25 m^2
Earth surface: 0.3 m × 0.3 m = 0.09 m^2
25/0.09 = 278 ≈ 300
Oh nevermind she must've just been making a linear comparison instead of an areal comparison. 1500/5 = 300. I agree with you though, you should be comparing areas and not linear dimensions.
This exactly. One pixel of the ocean floor covers the same area as 90000 pixels would on mars.
"we will be taking pictures of the ocean floor in 16 times the detail, and four times the size"
“Cartographically speaking, water sucks” had me laughing for way longer than it should’ve
Who said that?
sometimes awful jokes can make us laugh too, i agree
staring at a wall would be funnier than this comment
please never stop Cleo you're the best!!
This channel is underrated! ❤️
Something I was told is that we do know what most of the unexplored ocean contains. The thing is that it’s almost completely empty swaths of seafloor containing almost nothing of interest. So until now scientists had no reason to check it out, as it would have been too expensive for very little gain.
As long as that doesn’t lead to taking all the life out of the deep as we do with the surface, this is interesting
Lol, no they’re doing it for “science,” not economic exploitation and military control.
Well said!!!
We already have :(
@@charliemayfilms1550 Not yet,but unfortunately we are getting there :(
@@ralucapop1467 well coral reefs are bleached and species are dying bc of fishing nets, and massive garbage patches etc so idk I'd say we have. The ocean is resilient I will agree. I don't want it's life to be sucked dry, but it is being drained. Luckily it is inhabitable by us so at least (hopefully) we wont be building infastructure down there
"We know less about the ocean than we do Mars".
Goes to speak with Aquaman and Martian Man hunter: "Not missing much according to two guys I know".
Loving this channel ngl
Might have something to do with the ufos that routinely enter and exit the ocean. With CENTURIES of documented sightings of these things, it might be that surveying the ocean is being discouraged from on high. Just a thought.
🤦
source?
@@keyboardsmash42 He told its 'just a thought'. An interesting one I might agree.
@keyboardsmash42 from the diaries of Christopher Columbus, the department of the Navy, countless merchant reports, the Vatican ect. These accounts numerous and well known.
@@darththc christopher colombus just saw a light in the sky (theorized to be a meteorite), and the navy just saw something they couldn’t identify. im not saying ufos are definitely fake but these sources aren’t proof.
It's always better when we don't know things. Anything we find down there will be exploited and destroyed before we ever know how important it was to leave it alone.
Not to mention that the ground of the ocean is much less important than the animals that live in the water in those areas
Corporations want to drill the ocean floor for oil, national gas and pipelines, no matter the undiscovered species that die in the process.
@@zzulm tbh some of those creatures might be able to defeat us lmao. There are literal aliens deep in the ocean
I cannot not even comment on her without sounding like a simp. Beautiful beyond heaven and smart enough to get us there. I absolutely love her channel
A bit odd you think “beautiful beyond heaven” is important to enjoying the video
Also bit odd you feel like telling the world this
Love when shorts are a preview to a longer interesting video instead of mindless scrolling, I wish that was more common!
The enthusiasm and interesting knowledge. You get a sub!
That's why I hate people who go "too late to explore the world, too early to explore the universe"
Then when you bring up exploring the ocean, they suddenly realize they have a Netflix show to binge.
What’s the Netflix show called?
to early to explore the ocean then what am i gonna do just go out with my billion dollar submarine and diving gear and start swimming around?
@@aashig99I think op meant that people use that as an excuse to not explore after finding out there IS still a lot to discover
Most of those people would've stayed in their villages anyways! It takes either being insane, arrogance, ignorance, or balls of steel to explore the unknown.
@@IJMPVI oooh 😭 I misunderstood that one completely 🤚
The conspiracy people who "find" landed motherships and pyramids under the ocean using Google maps need to see this.
I would LOVE a huge if true of 40 minutes or more, or a podcast of you talking on more detail about the subjects you talk about on your videos!!
Same
Why am i getting this 1yr later😂😂
I want to build a deep underwater robot just for fun, but I realized that I’m probably not going to get a signal from so deep, and making it an autonomous AI is tedious and boring. I’ll stick with flying things
You learn something new everyday ❤
10/10
Also, the video about ocean maps is good.
Not seeing or knowing what's beneath me must be one of my biggest fears. Just imagining swimming in the middle of the Atlantic is sending down shivers down my spine.
I’ve heard people make the argument that we know more about the oceans than the moon and mars just there is so much to know that there is still vastly more we can’t even fathom
First time I don’t hear “for more optimistic science and tech stories subscribe”
Last words before the Titanic submarine went underwater
Beautiful and smart. This is a mans dream woman.
Genuine
As a kid I just knew somehow aliens were real! Then I learned about deep sea creatures and boom! Aliens were actually real
an alien has to be extraterrestrial
Precambrian life growth!😊
Their is alien 👽 world and now we're trying to invade it
We know....what THEY want us to know.
We know what they know. There’s nothing to crazy that can live at those depths.
@retrobeans24 exactly what THEY would say.👀
I remember watching Planet Earth’s Ocean episode and one of my buddies being like, “Dude look at that thing! That’s a fuckin alien! If that thing was coming at you in the air you’d be like, ‘Ahhhhhhh!!!!” Lol. So true.
Natalie portman knows her shit
First.
Yeah it's easier to build a spaceship than a submarine.
No, its not. But as she mentioned in the video, it is very hard to survey the ocean because light doesnt get to the ocean floor...
The bottom of the ocean is a less hospitable place than the vacuum of space. In many aspects yes, a spaceship is easier to build than a submarine. A spaceship must be designed to contain roughly one atmosphere of pressure whereas a submarine must be built to withstand many hundreds of atmospheres. You could survive exposure to a vacuum, but you could not survive exposure at the bottom of the ocean.
@@tahyang The most complex machines that were ever designed by humans are spaceships. Period.
@@Gentleman...Driver the Large Hadron Collider would like a word but uh...if you say so.
@@tahyang I have to disagree. But I feel like I could post a complete essay about that topic and I wouldnt convince you. Thats okay, and I wont try it. So... have a nice day. 🙂
Literal alien creatures, insane depths causing crazy amounts of crushing pressure, and giant squids are what keep me up at night
You're so good at making videos Cleo where did you acquire all these skills 😅?
I have thalassophobia. I’m glad we know so little about this death trap of a geographical concept.
You’re so beautiful 😢
You need to be put on some kind of list
Commenting for the UA-cam algorithm
My job is to maintain and fix the oceanographic hand hydrographic survey equipment on ships. There is and has been technology around for a long time to map seabed but its very expensive business.
Firstly, Its only really done when someone or company has a motivation to pay for it- ie they think there is oil etc there, they want to construct something like an oil pipeline, run a telecoms cable, install a renewable energy generator like wind turbine or tidal turbines etc.
Second is that the deeper the water the more problematic, expensive and complicated it becomes to do. Sound waves are whats used and unlike in air where we use electromagnetic and lightwaves , sound takes noticeable time to travel even in water so in deeper water it introducing delays and its extra complication. Also time taken to get equipment deployed to depth increases a lot and its all extra costs
3rd problem is that the seabed changes- its like sand dunes in the desert, but on a smaller scale. Things move, its dynamic. Change might not be as big as in desert but in areas where the information on the seabed is required its often checked regularly because changes occur, naturally and also due to fishing nets getting dragged along.
4th although we can get detailed chart build up to see whats there its done by sound, so you can see whats there in terms of an outline but not detailed to our eyes. Imagine you took a plaster cast of the seabed, you would see the peaks and troughs, depressions (pock marks), rocks, shipwrecks and other things but you would not know detail. What we see is effectively like this. To take photographs would be so time consuming as light doesn’t travel far in water so only a small area can be seen at a time.
I'm sure they have high res mapping of ocean, but it's classified, for military use only.
why tf is she so beautiful
why is she getting beautiful day by day?
Idk
OF when?
Wtf. No.
Please say this is a joke 😭
Calling it an alien world hits different these days…
I remember when I was growing up I thought like “why would anyone be a marine biologist, there’s nothing left to find”
Your very very beautiful ❤
There is a common misconception with this statement, it leads you to believe we know more about mars than our own oceans and this is simply not the case . First let's sum up the players, mars being half the size earth which is 71% water, and while we have mapped the surface of Mars we have very little data as to what lay beneath the mars surface, far less than the data we have on the depths of Earth's oceans, in truth the statement that is accurate would be we know very little about the depths of the ocean but even less about cave systems on Mars.
Pleasing refreshing information. Well presented😊
exactly!! we need to understand more about our own planet before looking at other, nice that we are starting to realize that tho.
The ecosystem of our oceans is far more important than many people realize. Glad to see some light being shed on this subject.
One day, we will find Atlantis. Either that or I am crazy. Probably the latter.
Haha atleast ur self aware m8
As someone going through a training program to become a deckhand that ends in a 90 day internship with one of the many companies that work with the college, and hoping to get a NOAA internship, this stuff is so fascinating to me. I will never be one of the researchers who maps the ocean, but I may work alongside them, and it would be so cool
That’s because the sun will become a supernova and we realize there are limited benefits for studying the ocean when the only chance for survival is up and away.
So there could be a submerged spaceship on the ocean floor, and we wouldn’t even know it
Technically, yeah it’s possible. The likelihood is extremely low, but even if there was, it would be impossible for us to retrieve it.
The reason is once you get so deep it doesn't matter. There's no money to be gained from it so you'll never see it
I always believed a marine biologist would be an amazing career.
“finally”? we’ve been throwing tech at it for a while
I admire enthusiasm on your face while narrating
I mean when Mars’ surface is visible from space and the ocean floor is under miles of water, it’s easy to see why we don’t know much about it.
Wow, I didn’t sea this coming
She likes to hear herself talk.
I guess teenage kraken was right with the quote “ humans know more about the surface of Mars than the depths of the ocean.”
We're starting to actually create a detailed map of the universe but our ocean's still just, blue? That's in a way very amusing.
You're late. We heard about this year's ago on UA-cam.
But glad you could make it. 💪
Thanks for the reminder.
Didn't know Kiera Knightley is also an expert on cartography! 😮
Ex hydrographic surveyor here who worked around the SA coast. Remote sensing over large ocean areas is not possible, so as she says, " cartographically water sucks". Oceanographic surveys are tedious and in many ways prohibitively expensive.
This is also one of the many reasons why MH370 hasn’t been found yet
Honestly MH370 isn’t much of a mystery, it’s a 99.9% chance we know exactly what happened to it, we just don’t know where the plane rests.
What did nasa find in the ocean that made them stop searching the ocean and wanting to get us of the planet 😅
First I don’t think it’s NASA thats conducting the research, and secondly it’s simply because of the large technological difficulties getting to the ocean floor because the pressure is so high.
@@jonasg.bisgaard1086 thank you 😊
I love this channel. Everyone is so doom and gloom about technology, and even worse, making conspiracies about the future, but you show the bright side.
It's like it's harder to scan the entire ocean floor then to send a satellite to Mars
My friend loves you so muchh... I cant explain his devotion towards you❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
A new part of the world for humans can disturb
It would be so much easier to map the ocean if there wasn’t an ocean in the way.
OceanGate is a massive innovation
"Alien Growth"
What!??
Okay but I LOVE the work Marie Tharp did for mapping the ocean floor
amazing information, amazing makeup as well 😊
wait till the comms system in a submarine says "leviathan class forms detected, are you sure whatever you're doing is worth it?"
What is the excuse for 1000 meter/ pixel on most of Antarctica?
We’ve had tech to do it for decades… it’s just that said tech (sonar mapping) would have massive negative effects on sea life if we actually went to the trouble of doing it.