Hm, the distinction would be the setting of boundaries in growth. Unlike In nature where are fine lines that are hardly ever transgressed to promote growth, the obscenity of the Human organisational construct of capitalsm will accept no boundaries to growth....until it kills off itself. The defining influence that turns natural capitalism into human capitalism is the limitless defect of avarice and lust in humans that will not accept any bounds and will pursue growth to the detriment and destruction of the ecology it exists in.
Thanks for the comment. That is an interesting point about boundaries. Consider though the unlikelihood that boundaries in nature are set by any sort of reason unless it exists for sentient beings sometimes. Non-sentient nature wouldn't set boundaries or have any except for chemical, molecular or other physical constraints (i.e. oil and water). I suppose some behavioral constraints exist too that support species continuity and are organically incorporated. In the Garden of Eden the first fully human beings transgressed boundaries of conduct and ever after humanity has paid the price.
Animals fight amongst themselves plenty. I personally think we should look to accomodating nature within our society rather than promoting this borderism between the two.
Hm, the distinction would be the setting of boundaries in growth. Unlike In nature where are fine lines that are hardly ever transgressed to promote growth, the obscenity of the Human organisational construct of capitalsm will accept no boundaries to growth....until it kills off itself.
The defining influence that turns natural capitalism into human capitalism is the limitless defect of avarice and lust in humans that will not accept any bounds and will pursue growth to the detriment and destruction of the ecology it exists in.
Thanks for the comment. That is an interesting point about boundaries. Consider though the unlikelihood that boundaries in nature are set by any sort of reason unless it exists for sentient beings sometimes. Non-sentient nature wouldn't set boundaries or have any except for chemical, molecular or other physical constraints (i.e. oil and water). I suppose some behavioral constraints exist too that support species continuity and are organically incorporated. In the Garden of Eden the first fully human beings transgressed boundaries of conduct and ever after humanity has paid the price.
Animals fight amongst themselves plenty.
I personally think we should look to accomodating nature within our society rather than promoting this borderism between the two.
algorithmic comment