Greatest respect. He's only stating facts and not war-mongering. Leave that to the Russians. If the Russians were so stupid as to launch nukes, I guarantee you Moscow and surrounding districts would cease to exist. So, it would help if you kept quiet as someone without a clue about military matters.
Not only delusional, but in fact ignorant, AND HE IS AN EFFING PROFESSOR? On what exactly! He forget or actually doesn't know that there are 750 millions of us crammed in an area of about 4.5 millions of square KM , it would take Putin's a small number of nuclear weapons to incinerate all of us before the puny number of Polaris weapon would hit Moscow. Russia is vast and less populated, sure lots of them would die but not the entire population unlike us with nowhere else to go.
@TomThumb-d1r What facts? That the UK can destroy Moscow 55 minutes. I believe the Germans and others have tried that crap before and we know what happened to them
You lot went "to war with others" all over the place, particularly in Ukraine, whilst your wicked leader lined his pockets with your taxes (according to Mr.Browder)! Incidentally, you lot still can't win that war, so if I were you, I'd sort out your own country, before you rubbishing ours!
@@RenegadeSound Yes, England won many battles, but remember it was the Russians who played the major role in kicking the Mongols and Muslims out of Europe and in defeating the Nazis since 60% of the Soviets were Russians.
i think if you took the time to listen he is not on about fighting a war with Russia its about nuclear deterrent the uk my be finished but that will not stop[ a submarine out of 40 missiles only one needs to get through as for beat Russia no body wins in a nuclear war if the people of Russia knew the truth do you think this war would still be going no need to be anti Russia they do that quite well on there own
It’s now the US Empire. The US is desperate to get its puppet Britain and Russia to nuke each other. It’s not really Britain provoking Russia, but instead US military officials who run British airforce bases here in Britain. This is what happens when you think the US is your friend, you end up getting pushed into a nuclear war.
Back to ZOG, my friend. You're an embarrassment and have read too many comics. Leave the conversation to those who know. Your office job is where you should be with similar keyboard warriors.
@@JohnSmith-tw8wd 🤣🤣🤣 Biden said No. Why do you think that is genius. Starmer was there with his candy box like a demented child. Cause Biden got the message from Russia. Now laugh some more.
What are you not getting here? Our missiles are in the north sea, even if the UK got obliterated, the nukes are hidden and will fire back, everyone dies. That's why it must never happen! And Russia nuclear threats are dangerous for all of us.
As for the power of the British warheads. Yes, they are six times more powerful than what was dropped on Hiroshima. But the funny thing is, the Russian warheads are 70 times more powerful than what was dropped on Hiroshima.
If a country is being attacked by the weapons of it's foe and it's people are being killed by such weapons. Then what the hell do people think the end game is.
@@rinatst.petersburg6511 The Allies and the Ukrainians (as part of the USSR) at Kursk, whilst being supplied by the breathtakingly valiant Allied -- many Eng., Scots & Irish -- sailors, travelling on the deadly Arctic Convoys!
@@mrs.taylor9666 Irony of ironies, the Ukrainian nationalists fought side by side with the nazis, particularly in the field of murdering Jews and Poles.
The fact that we don’t just have one submarine deployed with the purpose of retaliation against our enemies, which is predominantly Russia. The US and French military are obliged by their NATO membership to join the efforts of the British military. The catastrophic consequences are unthinkable for both sides.
Art 5 does oblige anything other than ‘support’! That ‘support’ is not necessarily suicide alongside other nations. It could merely be supplies and UN votes!
@@CrashRacer69 I understand the principle, but France is obligated simply as a result of its close proximity in a geographical sense, and subsequent self preservation. The US would surrender the right to be considered the leader of the free world and would literally be giving Russia a free rein on the world stage. This is largely dependent upon the state of country in the aftermath of an exchange with the UK. I do take your point, and on reflection it is clearly valid. Let’s hope that our exchange is an academic one 🙏🏻.
Nobody from western want to destroy Rússia. We are all forgetting who started this war, and in the first message on the beggining of Ucrain invasion Putler threaten all countries. This message from professor is just a remmind that we are United and also have nukes Don't subestimate NATO. We don't want war. This is the objective of Putler creste division and fear ... It's over for Putler. Great future for Ucrain and Russia, but without the oligarcs. They are the evil
If they strike the nukes on the ground level definitely, but air burst nukes do a ton of damage at ground level,but the radiation threat isn't a 100,000 yr ordeal.the land would be livable in a decade or so.
All the Russians do and have done since their illegal invasion is threaten with nukes. From day one Putin was threatening catastrophic consequences if anyone helped Ukraine. They have been doing this through their state owned TV and clinically insane presenters who laugh about leaving European cities in nuclear dust. If you consistently threaten to destroy other countries and even laugh at the prospect of the death of millions of innocens, then don't be surprised if those countries sit up and take notice and say well actually we have nukes too and they can reach you.
Russia in 5, wow that's so very quick. Before believing Russian nonsense, do the maths. You know how fast a missile would have to travel to get from Russia to UK in 5 minutes? Put it this way, think of Star Trek,
Would love to hear a debate on the current reality of the Ukrainian war situation with Scott Ritter and Daniel because I'd love to hear Scott's views on Daniel's talking down Putin and his nuclear ability.. bring it on 🤔
Little tip i learned from nuclear wars.The person who presses the nuclear button make sure you warm your fingers first so you don't get finger cramps.Thought that might be helpful.
55 minutes is not quick, it is very slow. The UK has 6 nuclear submarines. Russia has 58 active submarines, 30 of which are nuclear-powered. The Russian nuclear submarines can deliver up to 654 nuclear warheads.
UK is only small, it wouldn't need that many to wipe it out, so unless Russia can find all 6 subs with Nuclear missiles on board or x amount out of 6 in 55 mins.. well the rest is history..
Your numbers are wrong, and you're confusing different types of submarine. The UK operates two types of large submarines, SSN and SSBN. Only SSBNs carry ballistic missiles. Jibes about the number of warheads are pretty much irrelevant. Were Russia to explode the number of warheads you claim, and the UK exploded none at all, the entire planet would suffer a nuclear winter, contamination would cover the entire globe, so the chances of anyone, anywhere, surviving would be very low.
"Russia's nuclear threats don't make much impression in Britain." - well I'm no expert on nuclear detonations but my guess is that Russian Nuclear weapons exploding would at the very least create some inconvenient sized potholes, I wouldn't be at all surprised if I were to spill my cup of tea. It might also go some way to solving the heating crisis for some pensioners.
Why would and NATO nation need to invade Russia? If Russia has anything we in the west need we can just buy it, trade for it, barter for it and the Russians will be very happy to sell their grandbaboushkas for a profit. Russia has nothing we cannot buy somewhere else. Thefore apart from Russian invading its neighbours and issuing stupid threats Russia would pose no problems to the west and would be ignored. No idea what anyone in Russian thinks Russian has anything worth invading for. Especially as the Russian federation is busy shooting itself in the foot most of the time.
Ukraine's incursion into Kursk is a demonstration of just how weak the Russian Federation is, and how badly it defends its border. It follows that, if NATO had any interest in attacking Russia, it could be across the border very easily. Putin's constant cries that NATO seeks the destruction of Russia is empty rhetoric, using NATO as a bogey-man to scare the Russian people, telling them that only he can protect them against the dreadful things NATO will do to them. The reality is, he has made the Russian people less safe, thanks to his folly of attacking Ukraine, for which he is entirely responsible. As a direct consequence of this, Russian people are being called upon to fight in Ukraine, where thousands have been killed and injured; and Ukraine is striking back into Russia, destroying Russian facilities. Putin has failed the people of Russia, taking them down a blind alley of his own making.
Are you a clown Putin is the only one threatening country's with Nuclear weapons the British pm as never threatened Russia with Nukes only Tw*ts do that like Putin as his propaganda machine and the west are sick of his threats
The last time i checked just about a week ago Russia pulled up a nuclear submarine in the mist of Queen Elizabeth carrier strike group undetected causing panic in the strike group. The was a great statement to UK. What makes you dream you can defeat Russia?
Let there be PEACE!! Can there be creative ways to stop and think of other ways or rhetorics that summons both parties to a productive dialogue? While all these war equipments are used, most humans who suffer, know nothing about the reasons for it. While escalations are still going on, there are chances to remedy the situation by using language of peace instead! Those who object to PEACE surely are thinking of their benefit than the result it will have on the masses! Let there be PEACE in our World!
@@rinatst.petersburg6511 we know the possibility’s , I’m just saying that he needs to realise we have nukes as well. And do you think China would just sit back and let him destroy the world, no they wouldn’t.
You are providing arms aid to Ukraine. You are making a fuss when China, North Korea and Iran are providing arms to Russia. You have mental problems in general. Western leaders have very serious mental health problems. When journalists ask Western leaders about this contradictory situation, they experience South Park silence :)
@@ConxolConxol-fo9ru After the sanctions on Russia, Ms. Ursula von der Leyen responded to Russia's threat to cut off gas to EU countries by saying "How can such a thing happen? Russia is acting against the agreements." In other words, calculate the intelligence level of these EU administrators :) They are all completely stupid and immoral.
Actually, you're wrong about the test firings of Trident missiles: both launched. The submarine did what it's supposed to do: get the missile out of the water, at which point the missile's engine fires. This is the thing that didn't happen on the last test, but, since Trident missiles have been test-fired loads of times, it wasn't considered necessary to perform a new test, because the critical part of the test was for the submarine to eject the missile. Now, just remind me of how Russia's test firings on the _Kursk_ submarine went.
@@mrs.taylor9666 They've beaten Ukraine and de-militarized Europe along with depleting our arms stocks. They've won regardless of some test firing. Are you blind?
Nuclear war will have no winners and definitely not the Uk . We need to deescalate now and build back normal relations with Russia our biggest energy and food supplier. This nonsense has to stop and now 🇬🇧🇷🇺
When they get rid of that depraved, despot and have a Pres. Kara -Murza; otherwise, that lot can't be trusted! They poisoned people in the U.K., for goodness sake! Appeasement didn't stop Hitler! "If you don't learn from history, you're doomed to repeat it"!
Such a silly and idiotic thinking and how do you got the title professor 😂😂😂😂...if a missile will travel and the satellites cant see it travelling then boom😂😂😂😂😂😂
I can remember hiding under my desk at school during the 60s in the United States when we were preparing for a nuclear strike ☢ and yet Here we are at a couple ticks before midnight and nobody seems to give a fuck?
Honestly they are idiots starting with the headline. They somehow forgot Moscow is not all of Russia nor all nuclear weapons are there. Another question is. What would happen in the following 55 minutes to the island West of French coast?🤔 4 years old often holds more inteligent conversation than these 2. ....
According to recently publicly announced info on some of their new hypersonic missiles, Russia claims to be able to reach London or Paris from Russia in 206 seconds. If true and accurate, that would be 3.43 Minutes.
russian navy? Definitely not The Royal Navy -- please have a look at H.M.S. Defender's valiant, young sailors, standing up to to awful provocation by those devils, in Ukraine's territorial waters, on the Black Sea, bless them.
@@mrs.taylor9666 USA UK, victoria nuland did coup 2014, maidan, documented,stepan Bandera, nA z1.you should do your proper homework, black rock war for resources
@@Weevve ...and "you should" mind your own business! My remark was about our valiant, young sailors, standing up to your evil lot in Ukrainian territorial waters, on the Black Sea! You lot LOST Crimea in the Crimean War, at dreadful cost to the gallant Allies, but stole it, causing this horrific 10 yr. war! God only knows what you're on about!
@@mrs.taylor9666 well your ignorance is alarming.....as stated my pals and family in the navy would know more than you, don't you think.this war was started by the USA, with it's vassal UK....fact.....if you see the man today, military depleted, all forces depleted, no way to make steel, v nessassary for war ...wake up love....our leaders are fools, liers, corrupt, and we are in no shape , look to grant schapps on our nuclear sub with all top brass watching the firing of a trident,, it plopped 300 yards away from sub,, check,, it's in the main stream Medi a
@@johnh6137 Not true, Russia has the most Nuclearr stock pile in the world, and it has the world's largest bomb!!! Yes, U.S has U.K as it's Allie, but Russia has China as their Allie!!! There is a *prophecy* and it states... The day the bear and dragon join, it is game over!!! The world is against any escalation, this war must end!!! Nuclear war is not a joke... 1 bomb dropped will kill millions in minutes, and nly to mention the ramifications of Nuclear fallout!!!
This guy lives next door to Alice, in wonderland. Completely detached from the real world. I bet he is a consultant for electronic war game for the kids
UK is a one deluded nation. The RS-28 Sarmat (Russian: РС-28 Сармат,named after the Sarmatians; NATO reporting name: SS-X-29 or SS-X-30), often colloquially referred to as Satan II by media outlets, is a three-stage Russian silo-based, liquid-fueled, HGV-capable and FOBS-capable super-heavy intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) produced by the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau, UK is a stone age Island, can't even build a decent ship for their baby navy, wake up, the empire is long gone.
@@Will-jv6jh I am Danish, overrated junk, carriers, nuclear icebreakers is a better investment, and with the 3M22 Zircon, Russian scramjet-powered, nuclear-capable hypersonic cruise missile, US is 5 years behind minimum, Europe is already stone-age in this department, RU subs with Poseidon missiles 200 miles off the US and UK coast is enough, carriers are ONLY projection plus the last war US won was against Panama.
No one wins...no one !
I'm a critic. I think satan wins.😮
Putin is on a par with Hitler in ww2 A very dangerous . Phycotic
War hawks do the work of satan.
@@Critic-qn3hg make belive character
Finally some sense
Clark said Russia was fighting with washing machines and brooms
Washing machine chips.....
He forgot about the shovels that they finally took Bahkmut with. 🤣
Yes and Russian space stations were built by Eskimos, lol.
@@guzzirider701 Nah! The Eskimos would be far more efficient.
I think you'll find he said something like The Russians spend more time fighting to get their hands on Washing machines.
These warmongers don’t understand the impact of nuke wars. Talk like shit
Empty tin like them will always make the loudest noises
That crazy old man is near dead therfore he does not care about young people.
The Proffessor of warmongering is delusional
Greatest respect. He's only stating facts and not war-mongering. Leave that to the Russians. If the Russians were so stupid as to launch nukes, I guarantee you Moscow and surrounding districts would cease to exist. So, it would help if you kept quiet as someone without a clue about military matters.
Shall you be around to testify that . instead of brokering for peace Ur minds are still colonial processing.good luck for u@@TomThumb-d1r
Not only delusional, but in fact ignorant, AND HE IS AN EFFING PROFESSOR? On what exactly! He forget or actually doesn't know that there are 750 millions of us crammed in an area of about 4.5 millions of square KM , it would take Putin's a small number of nuclear weapons to incinerate all of us before the puny number of Polaris weapon would hit Moscow. Russia is vast and less populated, sure lots of them would die but not the entire population unlike us with nowhere else to go.
Well said@@TomThumb-d1r
@TomThumb-d1r What facts? That the UK can destroy Moscow 55 minutes. I believe the Germans and others have tried that crap before and we know what happened to them
England cant even run its own country, but then thinks it can go to war with others 😂😅
You lot went "to war with others" all over the place, particularly in Ukraine, whilst your wicked leader lined his pockets with your taxes (according to Mr.Browder)! Incidentally, you lot still can't win that war, so if I were you, I'd sort out your own country, before you rubbishing ours!
@G.C.7127 i dare you to google which country has won the the greatest number of battles, ever ..... off you go .
Yeah it's England btw . Knob!
We don't think we can. We know we can.
@@RenegadeSound your living in the distant past remember britain got chased out of europe at dunkirk.
@@RenegadeSound Yes, England won many battles, but remember it was the Russians who played the major role in kicking the Mongols and Muslims out of Europe and in defeating the Nazis since 60% of the Soviets were Russians.
Why you are so angry? It must be a reason ? Are you losing ?
No, the West and Ukraine are winning! On TV! 🤣
Mad means mutually assured destruction NO ONE WINS 😮😮
The last time the UK tried to launch a missile from a sub they failed - twice in a row !!!
😂😂😂they are delusional
The UK and USA are not white European nations. Why do they want Europe to fight a nuclear war with Russia
That doesn’t mean that they won’t get it right the third time
@@jayjay9610no they are completely realistic
@ianmuir3640 🤣🤣your as delusional as they are, the British are weak and pathetic and they need to stop playing with Russia before they find out
CLARKE makes me laugh, to be anti Russia does not mean you will beat Russia
100%
This guy has been wrong ever since the battle of Mariupol
Russia can not take Oekraïne 😂 wat a joke.
I doubt he's just ideologically wedded to anti Russian feelings. I'd love to see if he's on the pay roll of a think tank or MIC company.
i think if you took the time to listen he is not on about fighting a war with Russia its about nuclear deterrent the uk my be finished but that will not stop[ a submarine out of 40 missiles only one needs to get through as for beat Russia no body wins in a nuclear war if the people of Russia knew the truth do you think this war would still be going no need to be anti Russia they do that quite well on there own
This guy has lived his life and Ready to go
That's the fear I have for Putin, Biden and other world leaders... but especially Putin as I'm from the UK.
@@Rubbafingaz1: Remember, Putin Is a moderate politician.
And take us all with him!
To be honest, I think the Powerful Nations are not taking seriously the Human life
Yes, I agree. And the Powerful Nations have never taken human life seriously! They are insane!
DREAM ON ENGLAND
I am praying for the world peace. Amen.
The British Empire has long been a thing of the past.
Just like the Russian empire and the USSR.
This is a discussion on nuclear weapons and not empires!
It’s now the US Empire. The US is desperate to get its puppet Britain and Russia to nuke each other.
It’s not really Britain provoking Russia, but instead US military officials who run British airforce bases here in Britain.
This is what happens when you think the US is your friend, you end up getting pushed into a nuclear war.
Oh, and Ruzzia is not?
And all because of the migrants lol.
Who are you? Are you on planet Earth? 😂
Back to ZOG, my friend. You're an embarrassment and have read too many comics. Leave the conversation to those who know. Your office job is where you should be with similar keyboard warriors.
Russia can do it in 53. What a stupid line of thinking and for what.
Russia's latest rocket test disagrees 🤣🤣. Unless by 53 you mean 53km blast zone near their launch pad.
@@JohnSmith-tw8wd 🤣🤣🤣 Biden said No. Why do you think that is genius. Starmer was there with his candy box like a demented child. Cause Biden got the message from Russia. Now laugh some more.
@JohnSmith-tw8wd These youtube channels really need to stop deleting comments because people like you think they have a point
What are you not getting here? Our missiles are in the north sea, even if the UK got obliterated, the nukes are hidden and will fire back, everyone dies. That's why it must never happen! And Russia nuclear threats are dangerous for all of us.
Thank god this guy isn't in charge his decision would end civilization as we know it.
He's Nuts!
Right 😂 He's probs got stocks in The Military section😂😉
God decides!
Brilliant insights by prof. Clarke. Very knowledgeble!
As for the power of the British warheads. Yes, they are six times more powerful than what was dropped on Hiroshima. But the funny thing is, the Russian warheads are 70 times more powerful than what was dropped on Hiroshima.
Operantional Russian warheads heads are of a similar yield to the warheads on the trident missile.
@@StgoergegreatStGoerge our last two Trident tests have failed ☹️
@@StgoergegreatStGoerge stating facts isn’t foolish! Our last two Trident Tests have failed. fact
Look it up Georgie Boy.
Did you forget it's Old Soviet Kit probably poorly maintained...
Basically Junk
Was Churchill England of 1945 had more weapons than Germany of Hitler?
This man is living in the past
Time to watch the movie "Threads" again. Nobody should ever threaten Nuclear war.
That was a scary movie.
You are all crazy
Bro,America in itself is afraid of provoking russia and using Ukraine and some sort,the fuck will uk do,couldn't even handle Houthis
You imagine 1,000 years of warfare renders the UK impotent .
What a Load of Bollocks.
@@MaxwellMoore-d1u honestly uk ain't shit bruv,hate to break it to you,no one cares uk
Dumb
If a country is being attacked by the weapons of it's foe and it's people are being killed by such weapons. Then what the hell do people think the end game is.
dont forget who defeated the Germans and saved everyones bacon.
Wasn't incharges by Putin , Duh
@@kodiakcitycab891 obviously you don't know your history
@@kodiakcitycab891 the nation that chose Putin and backs him
@@rinatst.petersburg6511 The Allies and the Ukrainians (as part of the USSR) at Kursk, whilst being supplied by the breathtakingly valiant Allied -- many Eng., Scots & Irish -- sailors, travelling on the deadly Arctic Convoys!
@@mrs.taylor9666 Irony of ironies, the Ukrainian nationalists fought side by side with the nazis, particularly in the field of murdering Jews and Poles.
Best get my tin helmet out. This fellas probably got his own bunker somewhere
I bought 10 rolls of Aluminium foil
This guys one of my favs to listen into , knows his stuff .
The fact that we don’t just have one submarine deployed with the purpose of retaliation against our enemies, which is predominantly Russia. The US and French military are obliged by their NATO membership to join the efforts of the British military.
The catastrophic consequences are unthinkable for both sides.
Art 5 does oblige anything other than ‘support’! That ‘support’ is not necessarily suicide alongside other nations. It could merely be supplies and UN votes!
@@CrashRacer69 I understand the principle, but France is obligated simply as a result of its close proximity in a geographical sense, and subsequent self preservation. The US would surrender the right to be considered the leader of the free world and would literally be giving Russia a free rein on the world stage. This is largely dependent upon the state of country in the aftermath of an exchange with the UK.
I do take your point, and on reflection it is clearly valid. Let’s hope that our exchange is an academic one 🙏🏻.
Russia is not your enemy and if you believe they are then you are fkn stupid..
Israel will
Starmer has destroyed England already
What a dumb comment
destroy the world for what Professor?
Nobody from western want to destroy Rússia. We are all forgetting who started this war, and in the first message on the beggining of Ucrain invasion Putler threaten all countries.
This message from professor is just a remmind that we are United and also have nukes
Don't subestimate NATO. We don't want war. This is the objective of Putler creste division and fear ... It's over for Putler. Great future for Ucrain and Russia, but without the oligarcs. They are the evil
Ask putrid!
Madness, nobody wins we all die. The planet is trashed.
What about the Irish Naval fleet. I'd imagine that is a great deterrent. Putin wouldn't dare agitate the Irish navy
Unfortunately the Irish don't have much of a navy but I'm sure that would change.
He don't understand nobody can live on his island after a Russian nuclear attack for 10 000 years
ha ha im sure the muslims will find away to live in the uk
I think if you look it up, 10000 years is just the half life
Same in Moscow.
If they strike the nukes on the ground level definitely, but air burst nukes do a ton of damage at ground level,but the radiation threat isn't a 100,000 yr ordeal.the land would be livable in a decade or so.
Everyone is dead tho,keep that in mind
The last of the summer wine
It was high time that someone told Putin what would happen to him in a nuclear war.
i think he already knows just like the west know.
A lion do not even have to turn its head if a poodle 🐩 is barking behind
ABOUT TIME SOMEONE SAY IT,,,,AND SHOULD BE REPEATED AS MANY TIMES, AS THE RUSSIANS MENTIONED..."WE HAVE NUCLEARS TOO."
Yes and we are not the ones who are making threats.!!!!
Just stay away to russia ukraine is not uk not even a nato member are you willing to risk the uk for ukraine 😂
All the Russians do and have done since their illegal invasion is threaten with nukes. From day one Putin was threatening catastrophic consequences if anyone helped Ukraine. They have been doing this through their state owned TV and clinically insane presenters who laugh about leaving European cities in nuclear dust. If you consistently threaten to destroy other countries and even laugh at the prospect of the death of millions of innocens, then don't be surprised if those countries sit up and take notice and say well actually we have nukes too and they can reach you.
Yes
@@michaelagbayani4961 Ukraine is not a NATO member .... and you are still getting your ass kicked 🤣🤣🤣
Playing with fire...well, what can we do but pray it won't happen. 🙏🙏🙏
Britain can in 55 min... Russia in 5 min.
😂55 minutes is too long.
Russia in 5, wow that's so very quick. Before believing Russian nonsense, do the maths. You know how fast a missile would have to travel to get from Russia to UK in 5 minutes? Put it this way, think of Star Trek,
@@CarlWiganerUKRussia's hypersonic will hit the UK in under 30 minutes and cannot be stopped like ballistic missiles can.
@@CarlWiganerUKYou have to think before you say something!
Your German blood has been bread out of you shame on you
55 minutes, more like 5.5 minutes. Both the British and French have boomers.
What are you talking about? Britain doesn’t have any nuclear bombers.
@@KKTR3boomers, are a tearm for subs.
What garbage
@@KKTR3Vanguard class
Mr Putin fears our boomers 😂
Grandpa,your time has gone.
Russia is not my enemy.
Russia AMERICA IS AMERICA ENEMY AS WELL AS CHINA AND NORTH KOREA
I'm British and we shouldn't even be involved we have our own issues to deal with
A joke. British can't defeat Russia
Russia can’t even beat weak neighbor state
ENGLAND DREAM ON.
Professor Michael 👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏
Those who want to visit London for the last time will have to do so now, if you know what I mean by this!
Would love to hear a debate on the current reality of the Ukrainian war situation with Scott Ritter and Daniel because I'd love to hear Scott's views on Daniel's talking down Putin and his nuclear ability.. bring it on 🤔
Ritter the pedophile?
Thanke. You professor , excellent information for us all to
Old man is dreaming..
Do only I think this guy looks a little like Michael Caine?
Not a lot of people know that.
@@mikeleppard2771 😳
Little tip i learned from nuclear wars.The person who presses the nuclear button make sure you warm your fingers first so you don't get finger cramps.Thought that might be helpful.
yeah if they can even launch a missle successfully im doubtful
55 minutes is not quick, it is very slow. The UK has 6 nuclear submarines. Russia has 58 active submarines, 30 of which are nuclear-powered. The Russian nuclear submarines can deliver up to 654 nuclear warheads.
google it.
UK is only small, it wouldn't need that many to wipe it out, so unless Russia can find all 6 subs with Nuclear missiles on board or x amount out of 6 in 55 mins.. well the rest is history..
You are dumb😂😂
Your numbers are wrong, and you're confusing different types of submarine. The UK operates two types of large submarines, SSN and SSBN. Only SSBNs carry ballistic missiles.
Jibes about the number of warheads are pretty much irrelevant. Were Russia to explode the number of warheads you claim, and the UK exploded none at all, the entire planet would suffer a nuclear winter, contamination would cover the entire globe, so the chances of anyone, anywhere, surviving would be very low.
Give peace a chance, then we all will survive, this man is a war monger, he's not helping one bit.
I get it anyone not wearing 2 million sun block is gonna have a very bad day 😅
"Russia's nuclear threats don't make much impression in Britain." - well I'm no expert on nuclear detonations but my guess is that Russian Nuclear weapons exploding would at the very least create some inconvenient sized potholes, I wouldn't be at all surprised if I were to spill my cup of tea. It might also go some way to solving the heating crisis for some pensioners.
If they work.
Not more damn potholes!
That's really funny!
If Russia was a weak country NATO would have invaded as they did others. This is first time in history NATO met her match. Now look what we have
Nato are bemused at just how weak Russia are. The Russian military forces are playing out like an actual comedy show.
Why would and NATO nation need to invade Russia? If Russia has anything we in the west need we can just buy it, trade for it, barter for it and the Russians will be very happy to sell their grandbaboushkas for a profit.
Russia has nothing we cannot buy somewhere else. Thefore apart from Russian invading its neighbours and issuing stupid threats Russia would pose no problems to the west and would be ignored.
No idea what anyone in Russian thinks Russian has anything worth invading for. Especially as the Russian federation is busy shooting itself in the foot most of the time.
Also they couldn't be defeated by sanctions
Tanzania was not invaded by NATO, is Tanzania strong to fight NATO?
Ukraine's incursion into Kursk is a demonstration of just how weak the Russian Federation is, and how badly it defends its border.
It follows that, if NATO had any interest in attacking Russia, it could be across the border very easily.
Putin's constant cries that NATO seeks the destruction of Russia is empty rhetoric, using NATO as a bogey-man to scare the Russian people, telling them that only he can protect them against the dreadful things NATO will do to them. The reality is, he has made the Russian people less safe, thanks to his folly of attacking Ukraine, for which he is entirely responsible. As a direct consequence of this, Russian people are being called upon to fight in Ukraine, where thousands have been killed and injured; and Ukraine is striking back into Russia, destroying Russian facilities. Putin has failed the people of Russia, taking them down a blind alley of his own making.
They’ve been saying this for 10 years. China has both the capability and desire to purchase the entire export of their energy.
If UK strike Russai then good bye Uk 😂 this man is clown 🤡
Are you a clown Putin is the only one threatening country's with Nuclear weapons the British pm as never threatened Russia with Nukes only Tw*ts do that like Putin as his propaganda machine and the west are sick of his threats
So is Russia, gone.
Ruski will be goneski…
He speaks of defence, how is it so many on here are so numb?
@@bill5868 Russia is the largest country in the world nearly twice the size of the US
The last time i checked just about a week ago Russia pulled up a nuclear submarine in the mist of Queen Elizabeth carrier strike group undetected causing panic in the strike group. The was a great statement to UK. What makes you dream you can defeat Russia?
We have nukes too. I reckon that's why.
@@iankelly3081russia is all hot air
Let there be PEACE!! Can there be creative ways to stop and think of other ways or rhetorics that summons both parties to a productive dialogue?
While all these war equipments are used, most humans who suffer, know nothing about the reasons for it. While escalations are still
going on, there are chances to remedy the situation by using language of peace instead! Those who object to PEACE surely are thinking of their benefit than the result it will have on the masses! Let there be PEACE in our World!
I heard UK got contract with Good Year to buy extra range sling shots,
This professor is not OK
No you are 😂 please stop it.
@@bee5778 Tell this to British government
It was an apparent, intelligent, and informative interview.
big difference between nuclear weapons and hypersonic nuclear weapons also england is a tiny island Russia is avast country
We got enough to make a mess of his country, and that’s just us . He needs to think before opening that mouth of his .
you would be smashed half of it is unpopulated
@@Batman-x8k you were the first ones to open the mouth)). So, don't get offended. Just sit back and realize the possibilities
@@rinatst.petersburg6511 we know the possibility’s , I’m just saying that he needs to realise we have nukes as well. And do you think China would just sit back and let him destroy the world, no they wouldn’t.
Don't you mean Britain, bet your English,typical
Going by how quik we left Dunkirk we are not ready to die for aload of nazis.
@@charlesthrush6767 Whats disgusting about not wanting to die on a foriegn beach?and when did millions die ? your thinking of Russia.
You should learn how to spell.
Pootins special military fiasco 🤣
Not so fast. 😊At this point it looks like Putin prepared fiasco for natso)
It would have been more good pushing towards peace instead of bosting about power where does the innocent people go
Thanks 👍
We do not want nuk in the world
U destroyed yourself…and go where…
You are providing arms aid to Ukraine. You are making a fuss when China, North Korea and Iran are providing arms to Russia. You have mental problems in general. Western leaders have very serious mental health problems. When journalists ask Western leaders about this contradictory situation, they experience South Park silence :)
Go and live in Russia if you're not already there. Patton was right after WW11.
Dumb
Itszall a buncha tree huggin hippie crap goddammittt!!!@@ConxolConxol-fo9ru
@@ConxolConxol-fo9ru After the sanctions on Russia, Ms. Ursula von der Leyen responded to Russia's threat to cut off gas to EU countries by saying "How can such a thing happen? Russia is acting against the agreements." In other words, calculate the intelligence level of these EU administrators :) They are all completely stupid and immoral.
THANKS 4 REMINDING THEM ABOUT THEY NOT GOING INTIMIDATE MINIPULATE GREAT BRITAIAN AS USUALL WE BE THE ANCHOR!
Russia has the dead man switch on the nuke
Excellent professor Michael Clark, agree. Respect for Ukraine.
🤡
The Brits test fired two missiles from naval platforms and both failed to launch. I have no faith in this paper lion.
Actually, you're wrong about the test firings of Trident missiles: both launched. The submarine did what it's supposed to do: get the missile out of the water, at which point the missile's engine fires. This is the thing that didn't happen on the last test, but, since Trident missiles have been test-fired loads of times, it wasn't considered necessary to perform a new test, because the critical part of the test was for the submarine to eject the missile.
Now, just remind me of how Russia's test firings on the _Kursk_ submarine went.
Have a look at russia's 21st.Sept., '24 failed SARMAT test, please!
@@mrs.taylor9666 They've beaten Ukraine and de-militarized Europe along with depleting our arms stocks. They've won regardless of some test firing. Are you blind?
So why is putin pooing his pants over storm shadows if our missiles are unlaunchable...
Do they not think ,Putin not got toys like this in his toybox ,And many more
I’m amazed by your thinking your racional professor. 💯👍
Nuclear war will have no winners and definitely not the Uk . We need to deescalate now and build back normal relations with Russia our biggest energy and food supplier. This nonsense has to stop and now 🇬🇧🇷🇺
When they get rid of that depraved, despot and have a Pres. Kara -Murza; otherwise, that lot can't be trusted! They poisoned people in the U.K., for goodness sake! Appeasement didn't stop Hitler! "If you don't learn from history, you're doomed to repeat it"!
Such a silly and idiotic thinking and how do you got the title professor 😂😂😂😂...if a missile will travel and the satellites cant see it travelling then boom😂😂😂😂😂😂
I can remember hiding under my desk at school during the 60s in the United States when we were preparing for a nuclear strike ☢ and yet Here we are at a couple ticks before midnight and nobody seems to give a fuck?
Civilization going, going, go......
In Russia it went a long time ago apparently.
@@kmg474 that's in your head. Wake up to reality
That was one of the most discusting conversation I ever heard !
true however
Honestly they are idiots starting with the headline. They somehow forgot Moscow is not all of Russia nor all nuclear weapons are there.
Another question is.
What would happen in the following 55 minutes to the island West of French coast?🤔
4 years old often holds more inteligent conversation than these 2. ....
According to recently publicly announced info on some of their new hypersonic missiles, Russia claims to be able to reach London or Paris from Russia in 206 seconds. If true and accurate, that would be 3.43 Minutes.
My mate in the navy says....they couldn't hit anything that they aimed at....true....scary....true....
russian navy? Definitely not The Royal Navy -- please have a look at H.M.S. Defender's valiant, young sailors, standing up to to awful provocation by those devils, in Ukraine's territorial waters, on the Black Sea, bless them.
@@mrs.taylor9666 USA UK, victoria nuland did coup 2014, maidan, documented,stepan Bandera, nA z1.you should do your proper homework, black rock war for resources
@@Weevve ...and "you should" mind your own business! My remark was about our valiant, young sailors, standing up to your evil lot in Ukrainian territorial waters, on the Black Sea! You lot LOST Crimea in the Crimean War, at dreadful cost to the gallant Allies, but stole it, causing this horrific 10 yr. war! God only knows what you're on about!
@@mrs.taylor9666 well your ignorance is alarming.....as stated my pals and family in the navy would know more than you, don't you think.this war was started by the USA, with it's vassal UK....fact.....if you see the man today, military depleted, all forces depleted, no way to make steel, v nessassary for war ...wake up love....our leaders are fools, liers, corrupt, and we are in no shape , look to grant schapps on our nuclear sub with all top brass watching the firing of a trident,, it plopped 300 yards away from sub,, check,, it's in the main stream Medi a
I don’t want Moscow to be destroyed; I have friends in Moscow and in Ukraine as well. Mr Putin should retire.
Don’t make me laugh! Uk? 😂
Cockle😅
You guys are dreaming please we don't need war
5 min or 1 hr , 50 years is still a long time to live in a bunker.😂😂😂😂
Do you even know the mere size of Russia compared to the U.K???😮😮😮
As is often stated, size doesn't matter. Not when you are dealing with nukes.
NATO has more nukes than Russia, as a collective.
Russia? Is only moscow, the rest is open fields and farm😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
The USA has as many as Russia has and the UK is an ally
@@johnh6137 Not true, Russia has the most Nuclearr stock pile in the world, and it has the world's largest bomb!!!
Yes, U.S has U.K as it's Allie, but Russia has China as their Allie!!!
There is a *prophecy* and it states...
The day the bear and dragon join, it is game over!!!
The world is against any escalation, this war must end!!!
Nuclear war is not a joke...
1 bomb dropped will kill millions in minutes, and nly to mention the ramifications of Nuclear fallout!!!
Yes, a professor psychopath. The good news is that he would finally try his own medicine if everything went down.
Thank you U K 🙏
Specially if the chef of submarines is Boris Johnson, with supervision Tony Blear,
😂
"chef"?! You lot must be kids with your silly remarks!
And I like 👍 professor Clarke? I would listen 👂 just to reassure my own thoughts 💭 Sometimes 😂👍👍🤓
I envy Michael Clarkes students , a clear, coherent , analyst
US is playing smart game not wanting escalation but destroy the enemy gradually
Delusional bs
But Russia can do it in 15 😂😂😂
This guy lives next door to Alice, in wonderland. Completely detached from the real world. I bet he is a consultant for electronic war game for the kids
UK is a one deluded nation. The RS-28 Sarmat (Russian: РС-28 Сармат,named after the Sarmatians; NATO reporting name: SS-X-29 or SS-X-30), often colloquially referred to as Satan II by media outlets, is a three-stage Russian silo-based, liquid-fueled, HGV-capable and FOBS-capable super-heavy intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) produced by the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau, UK is a stone age Island, can't even build a decent ship for their baby navy, wake up, the empire is long gone.
How’s your aircraft carrier doing ?😂
@@Will-jv6jh I am Danish, overrated junk, carriers, nuclear icebreakers is a better investment, and with the 3M22 Zircon, Russian scramjet-powered, nuclear-capable hypersonic cruise missile, US is 5 years behind minimum, Europe is already stone-age in this department, RU subs with Poseidon missiles 200 miles off the US and UK coast is enough, carriers are ONLY projection plus the last war US won was against Panama.
At least the Russia carrier has planes on it
@@AndrewWilkin-n4i INDEED, STILL JUNK, thats why they do not build more, got zero strategic value
I'm not trying to be rude, but the so-called Satan can't seem to make out of the silo without blowing itself up.
and what for Christ's sake, would the reply from Putin do to England ??? and maybe all the rest of us.
We can take it.