You were talking about how much good pr you’d get from having the self driving car kill the passengers instead of the child, but who’s going to want to buy a car that prioritizes someone else’s life?
As a philosophy and ethics a level student (exam results this week oh god) this game gave me some VIOLENT flashbacks to the type of stuff we wrote essays about. would Bentham kill the dog
The vacationer one if I got an organ and I knew that I was from some random guy getting his check up I would be fucking mortified and I'd have survivor's guilt on all the steroids
I dont think that would even be survivors guilt Survivors guilt is like you survived a plane accident but nobody else did and you feel like you should have died aswell Aka guilty because you survived This is like blaming yourself because someone was murdered to save you
@@thatdamncrow9197 It would be survivor guilt as you'd be guilty you survived and the person murdered to help you didn't..you'd die without the organ provided so by the death of that person you literally survived. "a condition of persistent mental and emotional stress experienced by someone who has survived an incident in which others died."..it doesn't just apply to things like plane crashes, any situation where you lived while others didn't or you lived because others didn't applies towards survivors guilt. It also doesn't have to apply to death at all! Testing negative to something when everyone around you may make you feel guilty of forts which would also be survivors guilt, or others with the same condition as you dying while you didn't could lead to survivors guilt..Another definition is "Many people who live through trauma and other life threatening situations go on to develop survivor guilt, which refers to strong and persistent feelings of remorse, personal responsibility, and sadness" meaning it can apply to other situations of trauma, like feeling guilty and blaming yourself after being assaulted or sexually assaulted is a very common form of survivals guilt, if you make it out of a bad situation that is considerably traumatic you have a decent chance at feeling guilty about it even if you have no reason to.
I’d like to point out something with the dog problem at the beginning that I noticed thanks to a play through on Alpharad Deluxe, that ReadGraves chose to SAVE the dog. That wasn’t even an option
YEAH LIKE. The problem was that the dog is going to die. Do you kill it and put it out of it's misery, or let it die slowly. Those were the options. In that situation, the most humane thing to do, (Provided you knew for a fact the dog was actually going to die) is to euthanize them. Put them down. Even if it's the most morally guilty one.
They do something like that, actually! It's not the trolley problem exactly, but questions about who ppl would prioritise. Boyinaband made a video about it with corpse. Pretty interesting
Remove the lever and just put them all in one track. Preferrably as you're wearing a fancy suit with a cape twirling your long musgache. There, trolley problem solved.
This game, and the trolley problem itself is an example of a false dilemma, or a black and white problem. A lot of these questions with two answers actually have three or more other answers, like saving the dog instead of killing or letting it die. The game restricts the players to a black and white situation, so the narrator voice (whom I assume is controlling the game) is being hypocritical for telling Kwite that he should’ve saved the dog when that wasn’t even an option.
You can't really save the dog..you have somewhere to be so you don't have time to save it (who knows saving it could get you fired from work or something idk), and it's close to death so I don't think it's savable as you wouldn't be able to get it help in time. Trolley questions also aren't black and white as that assumes one situation is good the other bad, they're morally grey questions neither bad or good as either option can be justified or hated depending on how you view them like the og trolley question: switching the track is you killing 3 people (bad) switching the track is you saving 5 people (good), not switching the track means you aren't actively killing anyone (good) not switching the track means you're choosing to let the 5 people die thus killing them as you could of saved them (bad); neither answer right neither answer wrong.
orange and purple problems is more proper but i still agree. boiling down any situation to a binary digit can make anything "morally" complex. for example, the dog situation: you're not a vet you don't know anything about this dog or it's actual condition. there is no option to call an animal expert nor drag the dog out of the way and investigate further ignoring the rush you're in to prioritize your time on job affairs (dog on the rail is your duty after all, you are the trollyman and obstruction of the rails would fall under guidelines.) Under its most basic principles a trolly problem like this is more of a moment of choice in uncommon circumstance rather then a test of true character tbh. some questions or hypothesis cannot account for the versatility and creativity of a individual human being.
I love how the game tells you not to kill other people or jump off bridges *after* bringing you through an AI war, leading a government and bringing you to hell.
I look at the trolley problem not to find the better option, but whether or not the people already on the track is worth taking an active role in another’s death. And so, I can walk away from every trolley problem without pulling the lever.
I would like to challenge your viewpoint. I argue, that by simply being there, and having a choice in the matter; you have become an active participant. You actively have the choice to pull the level or not, and by not doing so, you made the decision to not step in and let them die.
@@FluffyDragonDrawing exactly this, either way you were the cause of someone's death..whether you chose to pull the level and kill them or not pull it and watch them die.
@@testerwulf3357 Pretty much. Once you are present in the situation that means your choice matters. It's basically the bystander effect on a different level. "If I don't do anything or get involved, it's not my problem." And to _some_ degree sure, but in a court of law "Why didn't you stop that person from getting killed?" "Well your honour I figured if I didn't do anything it wasn't my problem." By simply being _present_ you are involved in the situation. Choosing inaction is still a choice.
For the 5 patient and tourists one I’d let the tourist go because I can get into some real legal trouble and I don’t wanna get my job taken especially if I’m a doctor because that’s like 8 years down the drain
With the second trolley problem, just because the girl dreams of becoming a doctor doesn't mean she will. How many of you dreamed of being police men or fire fighters?
@@FluffyDragonDrawing even so,if your idea of pulling the lever the first time to save the many at the moment given,it could be the man carrying the cure to cancer,you'd still pull the lever to save 10 people. if you don't because you know little of someone backstory,what happened when you know that out of the 5 people,1 will turn out to be a murderer. would you not pull the lever because one was a bad person out of the 5?
@@ryomahoshi4529 Didn't get a notification for this for some reason. I'm not sure entirely where you got that whole spiel from, as I said nothing of the sort nor do I disagree. I was simply providing more information/correcting the OP's comment. Of course it's a complicated situation, I didn't say it wasn't. Or that the choice SHOULD have been to save the girl, just the correction on the posters comment that it said her _fate,_ not _dream_ was to be a doctor.
exactly. the first question and the second one is the same to me, i was surprised at the disparity in the %s of players who agreed and disagreed with his choices
Omg I hate when neighbours get involved in that type of shit. Once I was offered to take care of a cat while the family was gone on vacation, but sadly the pet was on the verge of death. I didn't know the last part, and neither did the family's neighbours, so when they realized that it started walking weirdly and stuff they asked me if I actually took care of it or if I was just freeloading. Then they asked my mother (because she would join me occasionally), and even though we both said that Yes, we treat it as if it were our own pet, they still called the owners, said we wouldn't feed it, and then tried to *guilttrip* them into *putting the cat down*
@@_________-____________________ The neighours were the odd ones. Short version: They lied about me and my mother, and tried to guilttrip the actual owners of the cat to put the pet down.
@@ioan.c8868 Look man, i can understand being skeptical of the people taking care of the cat, especially if it doesn't seem like they are actually doing so... but trying to get them to put the cat down? That's fucked. Like, i commend them for calling out to said family to be like "hey... I'm worried that the people aren't actually taking care of your cat, they say they are but it looks really sick and is walking weird." But going any _further_ than that, or calling Prevention of animal cruelty is uh.... No
But it's not your neighbors dog..it's one lying on traintracks totally alone and is going to die as it's not receiving help. It's a completely different situation thus would have a different reaction. If I were in a car I'd absolutely pull over to check the animal and get it help (if I had time or could miss the thing I was heading for), but you can't do that if say you'll be fired for being late therefore you either leave it to suffer to death or end it quickly for it before leaving.
So, the child is unprotect meanwhile the passengers in the self driving car is in a big metal box with a bunch of safety features, so not killing the child is the right decision because the passengers have a much higher odds of survival that the child meaning the odds of anyone dying are lower.
It'd still look bad that car didn't take time to consider the passengers when swerving. Who'd want a car that would endanger them if someone was in the way? Literally no one. As much as pedestrians have to be safe, so do the drivers. I want a chance to survive
my thoughts on ANY doctor version of these is that as a doctor youve taken the hypocratic oath. THERFORE no matter the circumstances it would be immoral to break that oath.
i know how to solve the trolley problem without killing anyone. step 1: Try to slow down the trolley step 2: get a knife to set that one person on the other track free. step 3: divert the trolley to that track step 4: Golden medal from the mayor baby
I'll take it a step further, You can watch and let the person in the trolley decide you're fate,you can join you're fellow humans in their somewhere along the line and hope that it will be quick or would somehow stop the trolley
Honestly with the blowtorch or bone saw Kwite was a lot more intelligent with it than I expected. I knew the fried nerves and blood clotting stuff because I had a gory book phase (hunger games, divergent, ect. hunger games directly mentions fried nerves too) but I didn't expect Kwite to know that, it's impressive :D
2:30 i agree i would do nothing because when polly grows up and becomes a "great doctor" she could save more then 5 lives so in the long run you're saving more people. its like mario killing people (goomba's) to save peach and the mushroom kingdom
Oh my god- thank you- someone who agrees with my decisions. I watched ranboo play this and it was far too frustrating. But istg Kwite you literally said my exact thoughts.
This will forever be the video that showed me how it is to take the most foot numbing, heart wrenching, pressure aleaviating, rectum stretching, ass shaking shit ive ever took.
I agree, my dog was 15 it was a struggle to walk, and he couldn’t control when he went to the bathroom, so a couple months later I’m scared for life and cry randomly throughout the day😂
20:30 Can we just talk about how the letter mentions Beelzebub, said to be the ring leader of gluttony, in which gluttony does not specifically mean the sin for eating when not hungry and just for enjoyment?
My brother gave me one of these types of things and it went like this: There 5 people on a train track that are tied down. Flip the lever and it will kill 10 scuicidal people. You will not be liable for their deaths. My first reaction was to flip the switch. They wanna die right? What that the right decision.
to solve the trolley problem, you could just un-tape the 1 guy on the other path and then switch to the empty path. with the AI car, the car would notice the child and wouldn’t swerve, it would just brake quickly as that saves everyone. these types of problems are really stupid
So, one morning me and 5 of my colleges go out to check two trolley tracks for damages. One of them is still in use, but it is only one Trolley around noon. Of course the lazy smugs did not read up on the schedule and needed me to tell them. Yet, to save on some walking, they just jump into the first track we see and call me an asshole when I tell them we need to do the other one first, then come back to this one. I tell them there will be a Trolley coming in an hour, they would be in danger. They call me a Nerd. So of course only I stick to the plan (as always) and start alone on the one track that is not in use. After an hour I look up to see some brainlead touching a Lever only trained employees are supposed to use.
You were talking about how much good pr you’d get from having the self driving car kill the passengers instead of the child, but who’s going to want to buy a car that prioritizes someone else’s life?
Bad car design. This is not very consumer-friendly.
@@avidclown agreed.
the people’s whose life you just saved who’d buy some of your stuff as thanks
@@error8119 why would that person buy it when they know first hand the car would kill them as a passenger
@@BeefENacho maybe they buy something else instead of the car
As a philosophy and ethics a level student (exam results this week oh god) this game gave me some VIOLENT flashbacks to the type of stuff we wrote essays about.
would Bentham kill the dog
NOT BENTHAM
@@bubbybubbybubbyy it gets worse...imagine Kant
@@incelghetsis NOOOOOO
act vs. rule utilitarianism
Let us know when results come in. Also, how is something like ethics graded? What are the questions on the exam like?
It's interesting to see how Kwite falls back on humor to deal with stressful situations
I mean, isn't that just the majority of gen z? (from- a fellow zoomer)
Yeah, but it kind of ruins it since he's not seeming to answer it seriously, which isn't as fun.
@@aycoded7840 That's true. I wonder how he would answer if he wasn't streaming it 🤔
@@aycoded7840 I think he *is* answering seriously, just making his reasoning move joking.
It's the coping ways (from -a person with PTSD)
Knowing what I know now, if Kwite ever gets power like this, I’ll make sure I’m the first person hit by the trolley.
Best option honestly
why
The vacationer one if I got an organ and I knew that I was from some random guy getting his check up I would be fucking mortified and I'd have survivor's guilt on all the steroids
Me too and l'd never trust an hospital again
I dont think that would even be survivors guilt
Survivors guilt is like you survived a plane accident but nobody else did and you feel like you should have died aswell
Aka guilty because you survived
This is like blaming yourself because someone was murdered to save you
@@thatdamncrow9197Also, the person didn't agreed to anything, the dude's just got straight up murdered, and now the organs are inside your body :)
@@thatdamncrow9197 Oh I wasn't supposed to tag you sorry :/
@@thatdamncrow9197 It would be survivor guilt as you'd be guilty you survived and the person murdered to help you didn't..you'd die without the organ provided so by the death of that person you literally survived. "a condition of persistent mental and emotional stress experienced by someone who has survived an incident in which others died."..it doesn't just apply to things like plane crashes, any situation where you lived while others didn't or you lived because others didn't applies towards survivors guilt. It also doesn't have to apply to death at all! Testing negative to something when everyone around you may make you feel guilty of forts which would also be survivors guilt, or others with the same condition as you dying while you didn't could lead to survivors guilt..Another definition is "Many people who live through trauma and other life threatening situations go on to develop survivor guilt, which refers to strong and persistent feelings of remorse, personal responsibility, and sadness" meaning it can apply to other situations of trauma, like feeling guilty and blaming yourself after being assaulted or sexually assaulted is a very common form of survivals guilt, if you make it out of a bad situation that is considerably traumatic you have a decent chance at feeling guilty about it even if you have no reason to.
The elderly man deserved that heart, drunk crashers deserve punishment for making us drunk drivers look bad
booze cruisers get a bad reputation because of people like him
Also as a medical professional you shouldn't play god. Whoever was first gets the treatment.
Blame drunk CRASHERS not drivers
#notalldrunks
@@Deactivatedsorry You should not drive drunk.
@@justafurrywithinternet317 you mean you shouldn’t crash drunk
This was the first ever kwite stream i was able to catch, and i was not disappointed
no cuz same
SAME!
Idk who put him in office, but we here for him.
I like how every action tries to guilt trip you
I just love hearing Kwite laughin and giggling over a scary piece of shi. 💀💀 icon
I was about to comment this, his laugh gives me dopamine
@@Gh0sstt0wn I think the same thing all the time. He's adorable.
icon icon i i i i icon icon also a homosexual
@Kurtis bot
@@Gh0sstt0wn kipokzz zu lo
I’ve watched this game be played by 4 people so far and this is the most different of all them
I watched this game be played by alpharad and slimecel
I’d like to point out something with the dog problem at the beginning that I noticed thanks to a play through on Alpharad Deluxe, that ReadGraves chose to SAVE the dog. That wasn’t even an option
YEAH LIKE.
The problem was that the dog is going to die. Do you kill it and put it out of it's misery, or let it die slowly. Those were the options.
In that situation, the most humane thing to do, (Provided you knew for a fact the dog was actually going to die) is to euthanize them. Put them down. Even if it's the most morally guilty one.
imagine they use players choices in this game when they make real self driving cars 💀
@just i c e Imagine spamming links.
@@avidclown just report it and move on
They do something like that, actually! It's not the trolley problem exactly, but questions about who ppl would prioritise. Boyinaband made a video about it with corpse. Pretty interesting
@@rain596 cool! i will look at that video :)
@@rain596 can you link it? Is it on Corpse’s channel or Boyinband’s?
Fun fact: The font being in the game is called the 'Railway' font.
💀💀
Kwite gaslighting the game with Business Major moments is always a highlight
I love how the options, no matter what you do, just gaslight you into feeling wrong.
Can't believe kwite saved Andrew Tate instead of the old man 😔
Kwite really is underrated
*kwote
TRUE
fr
@@rykrostheguitarist i also meant his main channel and twitch channel
and kwote
Remove the lever and just put them all in one track. Preferrably as you're wearing a fancy suit with a cape twirling your long musgache. There, trolley problem solved.
Or a half foot toddler...
Kids are so cute.
Wait a minute.....that sounds like a novel cover
Then the train can run everyone over 💪
This game, and the trolley problem itself is an example of a false dilemma, or a black and white problem. A lot of these questions with two answers actually have three or more other answers, like saving the dog instead of killing or letting it die. The game restricts the players to a black and white situation, so the narrator voice (whom I assume is controlling the game) is being hypocritical for telling Kwite that he should’ve saved the dog when that wasn’t even an option.
You can't really save the dog..you have somewhere to be so you don't have time to save it (who knows saving it could get you fired from work or something idk), and it's close to death so I don't think it's savable as you wouldn't be able to get it help in time. Trolley questions also aren't black and white as that assumes one situation is good the other bad, they're morally grey questions neither bad or good as either option can be justified or hated depending on how you view them like the og trolley question: switching the track is you killing 3 people (bad) switching the track is you saving 5 people (good), not switching the track means you aren't actively killing anyone (good) not switching the track means you're choosing to let the 5 people die thus killing them as you could of saved them (bad); neither answer right neither answer wrong.
That's why it's an imaginary hypothetical tbf
@@testerwulf3357 I am not a vet I don't know if I can save a dog but I will try
orange and purple problems is more proper but i still agree. boiling down any situation to a binary digit can make anything "morally" complex.
for example, the dog situation: you're not a vet you don't know anything about this dog or it's actual condition. there is no option to call an animal expert nor drag the dog out of the way and investigate further ignoring the rush you're in to prioritize your time on job affairs (dog on the rail is your duty after all, you are the trollyman and obstruction of the rails would fall under guidelines.)
Under its most basic principles a trolly problem like this is more of a moment of choice in uncommon circumstance rather then a test of true character tbh. some questions or hypothesis cannot account for the versatility and creativity of a individual human being.
@@testerwulf3357 It's black and white as in there are only 2 options, not in that one is objectively better. It's a binary choice.
I love how the game tells you not to kill other people or jump off bridges *after* bringing you through an AI war, leading a government and bringing you to hell.
I look at the trolley problem not to find the better option, but whether or not the people already on the track is worth taking an active role in another’s death. And so, I can walk away from every trolley problem without pulling the lever.
I would like to challenge your viewpoint.
I argue, that by simply being there, and having a choice in the matter; you have become an active participant. You actively have the choice to pull the level or not, and by not doing so, you made the decision to not step in and let them die.
@@FluffyDragonDrawing exactly this, either way you were the cause of someone's death..whether you chose to pull the level and kill them or not pull it and watch them die.
@@testerwulf3357 Pretty much. Once you are present in the situation that means your choice matters. It's basically the bystander effect on a different level.
"If I don't do anything or get involved, it's not my problem."
And to _some_ degree sure, but in a court of law "Why didn't you stop that person from getting killed?" "Well your honour I figured if I didn't do anything it wasn't my problem."
By simply being _present_ you are involved in the situation. Choosing inaction is still a choice.
@@FluffyDragonDrawing "I would like to challenge your viewpoint."
That's the Joker trap. Exactly why they put it there.
@Jay Watching uhhhh maybe im just too sick to understand what you are saying but I'm confused
For the 5 patient and tourists one I’d let the tourist go because I can get into some real legal trouble and I don’t wanna get my job taken especially if I’m a doctor because that’s like 8 years down the drain
I mean,of course you'd get into legal troubles,you'd be killing someone lmao
@@ryomahoshi4529 And illegal organ harvest, FBI gonna put you down for that
Kwite singing "we just got a letter" threw me back into my elementary years 😭✋
With the second trolley problem, just because the girl dreams of becoming a doctor doesn't mean she will. How many of you dreamed of being police men or fire fighters?
I thought wishing to be a police men or fire fighters when you are young was a fiction character thing lmao
To be fair, it said her _fate_ was to be a doctor, not just her dream is to be one.
@@FluffyDragonDrawing even so,if your idea of pulling the lever the first time to save the many at the moment given,it could be the man carrying the cure to cancer,you'd still pull the lever to save 10 people.
if you don't because you know little of someone backstory,what happened when you know that out of the 5 people,1 will turn out to be a murderer. would you not pull the lever because one was a bad person out of the 5?
@@ryomahoshi4529 Didn't get a notification for this for some reason.
I'm not sure entirely where you got that whole spiel from, as I said nothing of the sort nor do I disagree. I was simply providing more information/correcting the OP's comment.
Of course it's a complicated situation, I didn't say it wasn't. Or that the choice SHOULD have been to save the girl, just the correction on the posters comment that it said her _fate,_ not _dream_ was to be a doctor.
exactly. the first question and the second one is the same to me, i was surprised at the disparity in the %s of players who agreed and disagreed with his choices
I just love the fact that the stats say "People Killed: 8,601,029" and then says "Children Killed: 1" like the one child isn't a person.
That's legit how some people wanna write the laws.
The dog one makes me think would you run over your neighbours dog if he looked sick and then find out the neighbour was saving him
Omg I hate when neighbours get involved in that type of shit. Once I was offered to take care of a cat while the family was gone on vacation, but sadly the pet was on the verge of death. I didn't know the last part, and neither did the family's neighbours, so when they realized that it started walking weirdly and stuff they asked me if I actually took care of it or if I was just freeloading. Then they asked my mother (because she would join me occasionally), and even though we both said that Yes, we treat it as if it were our own pet, they still called the owners, said we wouldn't feed it, and then tried to *guilttrip* them into *putting the cat down*
@@ioan.c8868 who's the bad people and who are the good
@@_________-____________________ The neighours were the odd ones.
Short version: They lied about me and my mother, and tried to guilttrip the actual owners of the cat to put the pet down.
@@ioan.c8868 Look man, i can understand being skeptical of the people taking care of the cat, especially if it doesn't seem like they are actually doing so... but trying to get them to put the cat down?
That's fucked.
Like, i commend them for calling out to said family to be like "hey... I'm worried that the people aren't actually taking care of your cat, they say they are but it looks really sick and is walking weird." But going any _further_ than that, or calling Prevention of animal cruelty is uh.... No
But it's not your neighbors dog..it's one lying on traintracks totally alone and is going to die as it's not receiving help. It's a completely different situation thus would have a different reaction. If I were in a car I'd absolutely pull over to check the animal and get it help (if I had time or could miss the thing I was heading for), but you can't do that if say you'll be fired for being late therefore you either leave it to suffer to death or end it quickly for it before leaving.
I love how this woman guilt trips you no matter what 😂
So, the child is unprotect meanwhile the passengers in the self driving car is in a big metal box with a bunch of safety features, so not killing the child is the right decision because the passengers have a much higher odds of survival that the child meaning the odds of anyone dying are lower.
"YEAH, THIS IS BIG BRAIN TIME!"
Off a cliff? Nah, the passengers would be dead asf
@@wizardlizard55555 Vs the chances of the kid surviving getting plowed by a high speed vehicle. Passengers can take it on that one
It'd still look bad that car didn't take time to consider the passengers when swerving. Who'd want a car that would endanger them if someone was in the way? Literally no one. As much as pedestrians have to be safe, so do the drivers. I want a chance to survive
@@wizardlizard55555 It wouldn't be hard to add a don't go off cliffs/lakes/anything that isn't a survivable object.
my thoughts on ANY doctor version of these is that as a doctor youve taken the hypocratic oath. THERFORE no matter the circumstances it would be immoral to break that oath.
“Don’t make me the villain”
“I’m safe to play the villain, if that’s what it takes”
It's better to switch on the turn, so it drift kill both side. The people will trip the cart and kill everyone.
Remember. No witnesses!
6:47
"making the mother of all omelettes here jack, cant fret over every egg"
-senator armstrong
8:12 the AI should hit THE BREAKS and stop anyone from dying
Trolley should do the same, cant a machinist see a buch of tied up people on the tracks?
@@alexturnbackthearmy1907 it DOES say its a runaway trolley
Had a lot of fun on stream, I liked the interaction with chat and the game
Starts out fine, then the guy slowly becomes a threat to society
14:45 kwite x flamingo fanfic when
Don't worry, man. Writing it right now.
@@Customized_Kuromithanks for replying to this a year and some later because now i’m even more optimistic for this fanfic lol
Game be like: I appreciate your choice, but AI is rasist therefore you stoopid, therefore L, therefore ratio.
some of these are like SUPER common ethics problems that we talk about in Philosophy classes. The best of professors turn it into a game.
The Elderly Man or Young Man choice is just reminding me of basically the premise of SAW VI. If you know, you know.
You should do another play through but use the "twitch'o'meter"
i know how to solve the trolley problem without killing anyone.
step 1: Try to slow down the trolley
step 2: get a knife to set that one person on the other track free.
step 3: divert the trolley to that track
step 4: Golden medal from the mayor baby
20:03 "I will fight against fate, even if it is a losing battle".
Genuinely hard ass line.
I would like to argue he made it even better
03:51 when you don't realize there is actually an option to save the dog-
There isn't. Never was.
"Readgraves chose to save the dog" Now that wasn't a choice was it?
I'll take it a step further,
You can watch and let the person in the trolley decide you're fate,you can join you're fellow humans in their somewhere along the line and hope that it will be quick or would somehow stop the trolley
Honestly with the blowtorch or bone saw Kwite was a lot more intelligent with it than I expected. I knew the fried nerves and blood clotting stuff because I had a gory book phase (hunger games, divergent, ect. hunger games directly mentions fried nerves too) but I didn't expect Kwite to know that, it's impressive :D
17:14 "ferb, i know what were going to do today!"
"I personally think the 5 dying patients should take some responsibility for having a failing organ"
Can't spell Trolley without Troll
Thabks quite, now I'll never be able to get "Five Nights at Trolley Problem" out of my head.😂
Everyone in Trolley Problems: do as little harm and be ethical
Me, watching as the trolley kills 5 people after the rich guy gave me money: *:)*
What happened to this game being about The Trolley Problem?
By 13:15 I think it’s gone off the rails.
Damn you, that's good. Corny, yes, but good. I hate it. Congratulations.
it really threw me off-guard how Kwite referenced Flamingo, as in, Albert. Kwite is a Flamingo stan fr
same
Kwite unknowingly made my day by making a flamingo reference.
3:00 She becomes a doctor in business and runs a corrupt company.
Springtrap is proud of you for this mass murder. Springtrap told me to tell you that he has a surprise for you.!
oh hell nah, kwite has legs in the thumbnail
Alternate title: Kwite being *completely* unhinged for 23 minutes
In all fairness your honor, my client was in goblin mode
2:30
i agree i would do nothing because when polly grows up and becomes a "great doctor" she could save more then 5 lives so in the long run you're saving more people.
its like mario killing people (goomba's) to save peach and the mushroom kingdom
21:18 "Better call saul"
the "i solved the trolley problem" followed immediately by "i have become the feds" is so menacing out of context
18:46 Tommy and Tyrone are the names of my uncle and his son 💀
Leave the dog alive, go rescue it, take it in as your own
They don't explain the aftermath
13:31 THAT WAS MY EXACT THOUGHT-
Fun fact you should pull the lever to kill the one guy because you are also responsible to save 5 people
(meaning you saved 4 people in total)
I watched some of this live and let me tell you, it was an experience lol
this eventually just became the exact plot of the 4th corporate war in cyberpunk
I DID IT, IM FINALLY SLIGHTLY EARLY
Same
We did it bro!
Congrats!
8:38 there should be no world where the car can't just stop without jellyfishing it's passengers
If only there were a medical ethics board that removed the choice from doctors in these healthcare scenarios and established standard procedure.
Me with 5 dachshunds: THEY ARE INDEED STUPID BUT ADORABLE!
Guys it’s so easy
Just aim for the highest kill count because the world is too harsh for anyone to live in 😍
Oh my god- thank you- someone who agrees with my decisions. I watched ranboo play this and it was far too frustrating. But istg Kwite you literally said my exact thoughts.
14:47 I’ve watched this so many times and didn’t realize he mentioned flamingo
Alternative Title: The Trolley Problem but it's more problematic than usual
wow, i never thought anyone could make the wrong choice every time. thanks for proving me wrong!
it's your own opinion that makes you say he was wrong. but for him he was right,and for many people too
That was a nice gameplay, and to be honest the choices you made were quite understandable.
This will forever be the video that showed me how it is to take the most foot numbing, heart wrenching, pressure aleaviating, rectum stretching, ass shaking shit ive ever took.
I agree, my dog was 15 it was a struggle to walk, and he couldn’t control when he went to the bathroom, so a couple months later I’m scared for life and cry randomly throughout the day😂
Did you use the wrong crying emoji
"Do you not feel responsible for their death?"
"No, not at all"
I can't even tell when Kwite is joking and when he's serious anymore x)
20:30
Can we just talk about how the letter mentions Beelzebub, said to be the ring leader of gluttony, in which gluttony does not specifically mean the sin for eating when not hungry and just for enjoyment?
14:44 hey i think i know that guy
7:32 The editor panned the funniest part "..A lot of messages coming in from a woman called KAREN" LMAO Argument instantly NULLIFIED!!
Its probably from the IRS 7:35
“At least it can die hating me instead of feeling like it was alone”
Holy shit dude
the situation in 7:03 happenened with the dengue fever vaccine that was administered in my country and as a result killed 600 children,,,, oof
Me: *sees the trolley problem*
My understanding of psycology: "that just went from 0 to a 100 real fucking quick"
8:30, or, have the car slow down to a stop
No officer its not drink driving,we simply call it a “difficulty tweek”
Ah yes another amazing video
My brother gave me one of these types of things and it went like this:
There 5 people on a train track that are tied down. Flip the lever and it will kill 10 scuicidal people. You will not be liable for their deaths.
My first reaction was to flip the switch. They wanna die right? What that the right decision.
20:51 no I'm not
to solve the trolley problem, you could just un-tape the 1 guy on the other path and then switch to the empty path. with the AI car, the car would notice the child and wouldn’t swerve, it would just brake quickly as that saves everyone. these types of problems are really stupid
this is insane
This stream was fucking hilarious. Go check out his livestreams in his description!
The 18 dislikes are just the angry parents
So, one morning me and 5 of my colleges go out to check two trolley tracks for damages. One of them is still in use, but it is only one Trolley around noon.
Of course the lazy smugs did not read up on the schedule and needed me to tell them. Yet, to save on some walking, they just jump into the first track we see and call me an asshole when I tell them we need to do the other one first, then come back to this one.
I tell them there will be a Trolley coming in an hour, they would be in danger. They call me a Nerd. So of course only I stick to the plan (as always) and start alone on the one track that is not in use.
After an hour I look up to see some brainlead touching a Lever only trained employees are supposed to use.