The only thing this experiment proves is confirmation bias can affect the experiment. Right now your confirmation bias is allowing you to believe that discrimination doesnt exist when it does. Why are we trying to tell people to give people the benefit of the doubt when its not warranted.
So if he was lying, and this study never actually happened but you want to believe it does because "woke" people are bad or something, would that not mean you are actually demonstrating confirmation bias by buying into the narrative that "wokeism" is bad BECAUSE this study is 100% false but you believe it because it's what you look for in the left's behavior?
Just looked up the study. This is a fantastic example of bias. If you think of yourself as a victim, you'll find that you see yourself being victimized virtually everywhere you go.
Were the interviewers in on the study? Were they genuine interviews? It could be that the interviewers were instructed to make loaded statements or ask loaded questions to fit in with the object of the study.
@Royston Richards Then the women would not be complaining about perceived slights; there would have been actual slights. As the study was to see if people felt they were being victimised when they were not, they would have to be very careful not to ask questions or in any way give the impression that they were victimising the women. The interviewers would have to be impartial, most likely reading from a script, so each woman would have the same experience. The amount of "adlibbing" would be zero, I suspect. Any deviation from the script between interviews would invalidate the whole experiment.
I just looked for it and couldn't find that study. Would you give the reference for it please. There are multiple studies showing discrimination against men and women with facial disfigurement. People with facial disfigurement feel mortified. The women who thought they had fake scars could not possibly all acted as "their normal selves" as they didn't feel normal and had a rational belief they were liable to be treated differently.
But if people weren't actually being discriminated against in the first place those people would not be looking for discrimination. Think about the fact that white people under the same circumstances don't feel that way. It's because they do not generally face discrimination so it's not something to look for. Here is an example. I live in Canada and in more than 30 years of driving I have been stopped by the cops a total of THREE times all for speeding. I was speeding. Last year I decided to visited my sister in Florida and between Ontario and Florida. I was stopped a total of 18 times. I ha e 360 cameras on my car which records sound inside and out. I have external speakers so I don't need roll my windows down but it seems to me that a black man driving a Maserati is a magnet for American ops. So now every time I cross the border and I see a cop I expect him to stop me and when he does I immediately think it's racially motivated. If a Canadian cop stops me I would never think that no matter his race. Do this little experiment as interesting as it may be is really saying absolutely nothing about the realities of human interactions.
@@jussayinmipeece1069 "But if people weren't actually being discriminated against in the first place those people would not be looking for discrimination. " Have you met a Radical Evangelical Christian?
So if you watched your grandparents and your parents get beat up by cops dog's turned loose on thim and even sometimes children. Redlining exc. You are not a victim? Well you clearly don't have a good concept of time. 19th century is not gone just in ower rear view meror. Healing takes time isn't that ironic?
Except that this man is describing the results incorrectly. The experiment PREDICTED complaints of bias but found NONE. Read for yourself. Kleck and Strenta, 1985, for reference
@@ramonmcgee2240 You are referring to the wrong experiment. This one is "Perceptions of the Impact of Negatively Valued Physical Characteristics on Social Interaction" by Kleck and Strenta (1980)
@@davidbroadfoot1864 Roger that. I read the study you referenced (the full report.) The interesting thing about the juxtaposition of the Kleck study and the speaker's point is that the "disfigurement" was apparent to the test subjects and then surreptitiously removed. In the context of race, it can hardly be denied that physical attributes associated with minorities has not been social and historical laced with demeaning and degrading descriptors. In that sense it cannot be said that the "disfigurement" is only the minds of minorities. In the Kleck test, there was no disfigurement to be viewed by the testors. That is not the case socially and historically for majority members looking at minorities.
Any details on the study? Like effect size, sample size, what journal it was published in, or if there was a control. Those are all very important for interpreting the results of just about any study.
Exactly. I'd also like to see if they did the exact same experiment with a group of men. Or if there was a control group setting for comparison (since he mentions 'increased', but compared to what?).
@@mattdombrowski8435 Yes. I am also familiar with the reality that "peer review" is just as much of a political tool as anything else in current year. There was a fake study done to "prove" that men were the cause of literally every single problem in society. Everything in it was literally made up. It was peer reviewed and published based exclusively by its title and conclusion.
Look it up. This "experiment" never happened. It was literally made up. Don't you wonder why it's so vague, no clips, no actual testimony? Because it isn't real THIS GUY JUST MADE SOMETHING UP TO GET ANGRY ABOUT
This is so true, I worked in dermatology for years, women would come in with complaints of horrible disfigurement on their faces. When asked where they would ask for a mirror to point out where the problem was. Our mirrors were normal and 2x magnification. They would then demand a 10x magnification mirror so they could find the spot that "everyone was staring at" I always wanted to know who all these people were carrying 10x magnifiers to star at people were.
@@JGDD7190 look it up. there are 2 to 3 minute videos on yt summing it up. pretty interesting. basically it's about people being more and more hyperfixated and paranoid avout things. best example: especially here in the western world we're living in literally one of the safest periods humanity EVER lived in. and yet people (especially women) over the last 2 decades startes to feel as unsafe as they did the last time over 100 years ago, because they hyperfocus on increasingly trivial things and make them bigger than they actually are.
@@pichelen This answer is both for you and the other comment. You are confusing a GROUP with EVERYONE. Nazis were a group, not EVERYONE. GROUPS tend to follow the same ideology, so a GROUP will act (wait for it) AS A GROUP. If the whole Planet Earth would've hated and acted as the Nazis against the Jews, then your statement would've been right. But at least 90% of the world condemned the Nazis.
@@pichelen Everyone wasn't against them. Not even the military let alone every citizen. All of that is from the SS officers, many of whom were executed in trial.
And the reverse is true too: if you constantly believe the ideology of victimhood is behind typical claims of discrimination, you can ignore discrimination which ought to be staring you in the face. The door swings both ways. But pretending it doesn’t is a good excuse not to have to think about prejudice or privilege, ever.
Very true. The worst part is, people are very aware of it. There are people who will use the ideology of Victimhood to dismiss any disagreements about how people are treated, but there are also people who will falsify oppression because they know it will be taken seriously and use it as a tool for personal gain rather than getting someone help they need. Both of these types of people make the other side point and go "look, see! We were right! You all are really oppressors/professional victims!" It's made a rather simple issue way more complicated than it ever should have been and it frankly pisses me off.
@@umbrellabirb3206 Growing up undiagnosed autistic and realising one day that “not everyone gets bullied for seemingly no reason” was really depressing
The study is "Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction.", by Robert Kleck and Angelo Strenta. *Edited with the correct study after someone pointed it out.
Since nobody here wanted to link to it, the study is called Perceptions of the Impact of Negatively Valued Characteristics on Social Interaction, it was published November 1980. It actually consisted of four studies. Broadly speaking, the participants who had been primed to believe they had a visible disfigurement (not all were given the scar, some were told that the interviewer was told they some non-visible deviancy such as allergies) were more likely to focus on gaze behavior in social situations. Importantly, the authors went on to point out in their conclusion that this modification in behavior by the test subjects for an experiment that involved temporarily interacting with one person while believing to be showing a physical impairment may not be consistent with the behavior patterns of individuals who live with physical disfigurement full time. Quote from the conclusion to the study: "The leap from these results, therefore, to the conclusion that they support Wright's (1960) assertion that physically handicapped persons are often prone to articulate their social reality entirely in terms of their handicap, even when the objective facts do not support such a construction, is tenuous at best." In short, this study really doesn't support the conclusion implied in this short. At best, it opens the door to further studies to determine if this is a valid conclusion or not. www.researchgate.net/publication/232481827_Perceptions_of_the_impact_of_negatively_valued_characteristics_on_social_interaction
Been honestly trying to articulate something along these lines the study did seem to focus nocebo induced self conciousness in someone whi hadnt previously had to deal with it rather than the framing of someone who does At least thats what i got from the shorts summary
I found an extension on this study from 1998. 'The effects of having a facial scar on state self-esteem and face-to-face social interactions' "targets were rated as more tense in the scar believe condition than in the no scar condition. There was, however, no support for a self-fulfilling prophecy theory"
But most of the people who watch this short will take it at face value and apply it by and large to social inequalities and assert that this proves that social inequality does not exist, specifically racism and sexism…
The study is called" Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction" by Kleck and Strena (1980) . Its important to note that theres no interview, no use of discrimination language or asked how they were discriminated, and there was more than just scarring, such as epilepsy. They were asked how they felt the interaction with the person they talked to went and what they were thinking at the time, it was more the internal conflict more than the actual subject of discussion, ie they felt stressed and nervous about the scarring and felt self conscious. Interesting study, shame its misrepresented to try and shut down the "woke crowd".
All that proves is that confirmation bias is a thing and if you tell people they're in a study of discrimination they're going to be actively looking for signs of discrimination.
isn't that the exact point he made? If you tell people they are always facing discrimination, they are going to be looking for signs of discrimination. This effect works both ways, in that telling someone they are a victim causes them to actively look for signs, but also being on the receiving end of even a small amount of discrimination can also create this effect.
Ok, well, people get discriminated against all the time. It is happening, and it's causing certain people who are under certain circumstances to fail. There really isn't anything we really can do to completely stop it either.
No, the point this short seems to be getting across is that the discrimination people face is actually made up; however, the study basically conditioned the women to look for possible discrimination, making it a biased and worthless study if you are attempting to prove said point.
@@miclowgunman1987 I think the point of the comment is that this will happen to any study even if it's not about discrimination. this doesn't say much about how we think discrimination is happening when it's not. it just shows if we look for something specific our brains will make connections even if there is none ex: if you start the day off thinking it's bad you will probably only notice the bad stuff that happens
Or the lack of empathy towards other people who suffer that leads to the refusal of accountability for the well-being of others that leads to the cruelty we now see in our society.
It’s definitely not a status marker, people just think it is and the left begrudgingly now goes along with it since they championed it for so long. But I can’t name anyone who looks up to someone with a victim complex.
Cruelty that we now see in our society? I would firmly believe that we have never lived in a less cruel society, think about it? To say otherwise is to completely make us into 'victims'.
@@bobbyhempel1513 depends on the scarring. Small ones, probably not. But huge gashes, far more likely. Though it does depend on the job. If your face is covered in scars, you wont easily get a job dealing with people.
@@handsomelarsandhisfabulousjars i dont think scars are seen as bad in general? it works for this experiment, because its only about the perception, but in reallife with people that have scars i dont think its generally seen as negative
As a woman with actual scars on my face due to a car accident when I was a child, I can say that some and I do mean some people do discriminate. Most look more for what you can do for them than what you look like.
Yeah, but as the experiment suggests, I believe you should not think that THAT'S the default of what people think about you. Those 'mean' people were some special cases/the anomaly/the unsual. There are many of them, but they're not the default. It's healthier to think this way.
Sure, not everyone is a perfect angel and there will be bad apples out there but I think we should never try to assume bigotry as the first thing to come to mind whenever something like this happens. For every person who would descriminate against your scars there is another person who won't and if you always assume bigotry then that's a very unfair generalization.
As someone with actual facial deformities, I can confirm you get treated differently. Not in a good way. You'd think only children who don't know any better will point, snicker, and say something about you, NOPE adults do it too. It's just sad when adults do it because they _should_ know better.
Can I ask you question..Don't you find it easier if kids ask you instead of just staring. I know some people isn't always in the mood to answer but I find when younger kids asked and they get their answers they move on and the staring stops whereas adults are worse then kids. They ignorantly stare and will do it till you randomly ask what's up
As an artist, I've always wanted to ask about deformities, especially the facial ones, as I find them very cool and interesting, but I always ignore it and just interact normally cuz I don't want to make anyone uncomfortable, and i especially dont want to direct bystander's attention to it. Maybe the only people who don't make fun are the people most interested, haha.
@@6ColourMeRainbow9 I have lots of facial scarring and a skin condition. I think its difficult topic cuz I rlly don't mind if people ask about it, but I now its a personal preference. its always about time and place I guess. if u hardly know someone probs none of ur business to ask or bringing it up if ur in a big group. I mostly find myself bringing it up when I know someone reasonably well. but asking kindly is always welcome personally as I know the people that ask are interested and curious and not people who would silently judge. :)
But you’re missing the point. No one is arguing that people with deformities are not treated differently. It is about how people can talk themselves into being treated badly because of a deformity that doesn’t even exist! Very clever study.
@Odi Etamo they don't talk themselves into being treated differently. The women in this study perceived discrimination and comments based on facial scarring, while there were none as there were no scars.
This is true. It's part of what makes discrimination so insidious. The fact that one might internalize their oppression does not necessarily mean that they are not being oppressed. This means that those from marginalized communities have to navigate both their own expectation of oppression as well as actual oppression. It is not, however, a reason to ignore the reality of discrimination in our society. It is rather yet another reason to call it out and take responsibility for it. Just imagine how the expectations of the participants in the study would have changed if they grew up in a culture that did not discriminate against people with scars. So you see, it is the discrimination that is the problem, not calling it out. Ignoring it makes it worse
@whocriesforbidennotme641 Indeed. I'm not sure in what way you disagree with what I said. It adds another layer to the suffering caused by discrimination. Therefore, you can be understanding and cut people a little slack when they are overly sensitive. And, you can do your best to be aware of the fact that sometimes we can act in discriminatory ways without consciously intending to do so
"If you think everyone around you is judging you, then you might be the one judging them by assuming the worst of their character." - from a website I visited
My wife does that to me from time to time. I bought a loaf of bread a few weeks ago to make sandwiches for lunch at work that week. She fussed at me and called me a snob because i bought a loaf of bread different from her loaf of bread. I told her i bought it to make sandwiches to take to work. A week and a half later i told her she owed me an apology because i had eaten the entire loaf of bread. She smiled and didn't say anything. Good thing she's not like this all the time i would have divorced her 20 years ago
I used to do air conditioning and one day I was given a helper. It was a young girl that had a little bit of experience because her dad owned an ac business and yes, she knew how to do her job. She got paid the same as me but did about half the work I did because she wasn't strong enough to lift up the air conditioners or the condensers but she could crawl through the attics better than I could. I got paid for my strength, she got paid for her size.
Sounds like you’re all for what those video is speaking against. You’re acting like you’ve been victimized because a woman wasn’t as strong as you. She probably did all the other work, poor, oppressed white guy.
@@Callofthevoid3 wow...talk about completely missing the point. You are a prime example of what's wrong with this world. You see someone giving praise to another person, but because of your preconceived ideas, all you can see is negativity. How sad for you.
Imagine one woman deviates from the experiment and goes, “ You wanna know how I got these scars ?” The interviewer sat there like , ” I’m sorry , what ? “
@@jaglinuxmint "And the result of the experiment is that we now have like 130 female Jokers running around causing havoc... But it's okay, we're gonna do another experiment where we tell a bunch of trust fund babies their parents were shot leaving the movies."
He is right, on a systematic level its imporant to not play the victim. HOWEVER, systemically its important to recognize that massive unjust inequalities still exist regardless of attitude.
honestly this feels more like it proves a person, who has never been discriminated against, thinks they know what discrimination is like. Best case scenario it proves that it's difficult to tell when someone is discriminating against you, nothing to do with the actual fact that discrimination exists
I do have a facial scar. As a kid, people , usually boys, commented on it and made fun of me. I was about 29 when i no longer cared what people thought. A coworker commented the other day on the scar and was shocked that im not self-conscious about it. I told her i had a long time to get over insecurities of things i cannot control
How could you be insecure about a scar you know you don't really have though? I don't see how this experiment would be tainted by insecurity, I think it is a good example of victimhood as they were primed with the idea that they will be judged. Edit: just realized I commented a reply, I wasn't targeting the op of this comment, just that some people argue that this experiment is tainted by insecurity which i doubt.
@@archive8080that’s just not true. Some don’t care, some are curious, and some are cruel about it. There’s always at least those 3, maybe a mix of them, and maybe something else.
I’ve know people with disabilities that were stay at home and draw a check bad and had difficult jobs that were very demanding but acted like it no big deal. That’s true wealth. I remember one lady that would get up from her desk, got on crutches and come to the counter to wait on me. She always had a smile and treated me like I was the only customer she had all day. She doesn’t even know how that affected me even today. ❤
I get what you’re trying to say here, but as a multi disabled person who works in advocacy, I’m absolutely begging you to hear me out when I say that *this is damaging*. That’s not playing victim-that’s just a fact. Disabled people are constantly praised for “not letting their disabilities define them” but do you know what that results in?? Burnout. Increased chronic pain. Depression. Anxiety. Ostracism. Poor hygiene and diet. Terrible sleep. More medications… The only time we seem to be appreciated is when we have something “valuable” to offer because if we don’t, then we’re considered deadweights to society.
It wasn't even about interviews. This man is lying about the study and how it was presented and what the raw findings might indicate. You can look the study up. It's not like he says. Makes you wonder why he'd be so deceptive.
@@cs5384 What in the world are you talking about?? The study was described exactly as he does, in “The New York Times”…..It was conducted at Dartmouth University in 1991, with 27 participants. The results were exactly what has been revealed in this post. Why are you seemingly lying about this? What is your agenda?
I agree with the dangers of victimhood. But you cant ignore the actual experience of being a victim. Some Persons arent preached discrimination they experience it.
And? They didn't say that discrimination is impossible, they just said that if you look for discrimination you will find it in things that are not discriminatory.
And most people "experience" discrimination because they are told it exists literally everywhere and they are a poor innocent victim who needs special treatment. In current year, "discrimination" is refusing to install a litter box in the school restroom because you identify as a cat.
That's not the point of the video. He's simply pointing out that if people believe they are being oppressed, they will feel oppression whether it's there or not. Teaching people that they are at a disadvantage when they are not, really hamstrings society. We have way too many minorities that believe they are living unhappy lives due to white privilege, and women believing they can't achieve success due to a patriarchy. There's nothing stopping minorities from pursuing an education and starting a business and investing their money. In fact, it's easier for them to pursue an education due to minority scholarships and affirmative action. If anything, there's a real case of minority privilege, rather than white privilege. White males face more criticism and oppression than any other group in the US. It seems anything they do that is within their nature is considered toxic masculinity, and any success they achieve was the result of privilege. They can't win.
@@vvhitevvabbit6479 this must be the most dumb comment I have read in a while. oh while males are so oppressed even though stats show otherwise. you are the perfect example of confirmation bias
As a woman who has a scar on my forehead, I have never felt discriminated because of it. I actually became topic of conversation. People ask me how i got the Harry Potter scar 😆
The men had a heightened sense of confidence. Visual proof of past hardship gives credit to the wisdom and advice you share. It's the opposite of narcissism.
I had a friend with terrible facial scars, she was lovely, her personality not only made her scars of no consequence but she often said that she believed she got treated better simply because people felt sorry for her, which i thought was so sad :( but at the same time i appreciated that people tried so hard to not make her feel conscious of it, such a conundrum, so its difficult for people to react because either way can be deemed as wrong.
You're doing exactly what he said. You're making her scars everything. You're even "so sad" because people treat her nicely. You're definitely playing the victim about something that doesn't even affect you.
So what you're saying is that the West is so out of touch with reality that they're so afraid to speak the truth out of fear of hurting her so called feelings? I would wonder if she got into those jobs by being a charity case then. In my country, she would be grilled with how she'd interact with the company or the team. If she showed any signs of being a problem, she would never make it pass the initial interview.
I work in retail, so part of working in retail is greeting the customers and checking to see if they need anything. There were a few instance where I would check on someone and they would immediately say “I’m not stealing so you don’t have to follow me” or “I promise there’s nothing in my bag.” It always leaves me speechless.
I just had this a couple of months ago. I was the only person on the sales floor and so had to help customers and ring them out. I also had a cart of back stock to put on the shelves right where this lady was. I went into the aisle just to be there to help and took advantage of that time to get things on the shelf. She left and it looked like she was headed toward the register. I started back and she said she felt like I was following her. I told her no, and after I checked her out, I apologized for appearing that way. She thanked me for the apology. Having said that, I did nothing wrong to have to apologize. It was in her mind. I've done this with many people over seven years or more and have never had anyone say this.
You should understand some ppl definitely do get profiled when shopping and it makes you feel like a dog. So please give them grace, we can't tell who's being nice and who's just keeping an eye on us thinking we are nothing but a dirty thief, it tends to make you a bit defensive.
i feel like this only works if there also was a group that actually kept the scars, so that we can compare it to something. also self perception is a different thing, i wanna see results of which group was more likely to get hired. edit: this blew up and i am obviously not gonna read everything. just adding that i didn't mean to criticize the study. i understand the study itself is about perception, but in the context it is used for in the video makes it sound like people who say they face discrimination only have it all in their head.
This, its no good claiming discrimination is in our heads without gathering the data on the percentage of people with actual disfigurements that got hired vs those without. Yes sometimes we victimise ourselves, but this video seems to be saying that discrimination doesn't actually happen when it most certainly does
Sure, but it sounds like the experiment was only about how the scars changes their self-perception, not about how it actually changes their chances of getting hired. Point being that if you are primed to think you will be discriminated against, you probably will think your being discriminated against.
@@TheRedfire555 nope it’s just the part of the experiment he described. All experiments have control groups. So there has to be at least two other groups. One group who knows they have no scares and another who knows they have scares. Also was this experiment just in women or is he omitting the male arm. He doesn’t even give the name of the study or anything.
@@TheRedfire555 I totally get that, I just feel that they could have done more to point out that some discrimination is real, and we shouldn't go around thinking all discrimination is in our heads because sometimes it is real and if we think its just in the persons head we essentially ignore the victim, which I think is how a lot of people end up committing suicide, they feel unseen
I hired a lot of people. I don't care about scars, unless they would be the result of auto mutilation or self scarification as that might suggest a mental issue
If you tell people they are in a study to examine discrimination based on facial deformities and show them the scars, of course they're actively looking for those things, and reporting them back, because that's what they expect to happen. That's why in most psychology experiments, you leave the subjects clueless about what they're trying to find out. Otherwise they're gonna be already influenced and won't behave like normal.
@@Mewmew-lv5iv insecurity and oppression are two different things. You literally only feel oppressed if you actually are oppressed. Feeling made fun of or insecure is not the same thing as feeling discriminated against and this study has absolutely nothing to do with oppression or perceived oppression
Except that the study he mentioned did none of that. The study he referring to is called "gender and responses to disfigurement in self and others" and it didn't even have those women go look for a job. The purpose of the study was to see if facial discrimination differs in gender, and how the participants react to their own disfigurement and how it impacts their relationship... Dude just bs an entire study :)))
@@hhbddjstar I thought it sounded weird when he specified that women were the ones being tested on, because if you're looking for information about feelings of victimhood, it would be helpful to look at everyone. I feel like he's using the fact that they used a group of women in the study to subtly imply that feeling like a victim is a "female trait" along with saying that doing such is inherently bad. Kinda yucky all round
@@butchcoolidge2533 You're missing the fact perception isn't as black and white as you wish it was. Feeling oppressed and being oppressed aren't necessarily correlated. Idk, where you came up with the idea that you only feel that way through the action. You can translate an action of being made fun of into discrimination which would then be oppression. Perception is key
@@hhbddjstar Dude, the women in the study specifically mentioned people staring at their scars. Obviously their perception of how people were treating them had been very much influenced by their expectations.
It's the same study... You can call it victimhood if you want.. but it's not really about that. It's about confirmation bias which has already been said elsewhere. If the manager gets in his head that a worker is trouble, he'll confirm that suspicion even when it isn't true.
I worked with a guy once who said his mother did hiring for higher level managers for a corporation. One thing he told me she would do is take them to lunch on the interview and if the interviewee salted or peppered their food before they tasted it she was unlikely to hire them because she thought that was an indication of them being a premature problem solver. I told him his mother seems to be the one with that problem.
This is so true! To many times I've been asked Are you depressed, do you suffer Anxiety; I tell these folks You must be talking about yourself! From the looks of things; they did not expect my answer to turn it back to where it comes from .them!
Yes and so can lying like this man has done. The study he's referencing isn't like what he said and their conclusions were not the same as his, because they are scientists are educated in their field and understand how scientific studies work... and Konstantin Kisin is a writer with no formal post-secondary education. But you are lucky today, as you can go look for this study. It takes three search terms. You can find this study and see for yourself how this man has deceived people in this video. And then ask yourself why he'd do such a thing.
Cuntstantine is a liar. that's not how the experiment was set up and its not what it found. look up "Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction"
I love how guys immediately get biased because he's talking about women (without actually citing that "study" btw) and not recognize the whining men everywhere in the interwebs leave about feminism, about how women are too proud and whatever. Because that's what a lot of MRAs and PUAs do, talk men into some victim role 😂😂
I worked in the job centre and everyone would go on about they aren't given a chance because... their age, lack of experience, career break for children, disability etc. They all convinced themselves that they were not going to be successful. Mindset is the single most important thing for our success
Yes but people are judged on looks colour race religion language. Understand him but their is something wrong in his opinion also what would something said to think this unless knowing what was said cannot believe it
The fact is they are using it as excuses for things they don't want to do ...if people can play on things to benefit them .. that's exactly what they will do . More and more of these lazy people are multiplying as the years go on.
Yes but it is very hard when you are told to apply for x amount of jobs a week. And get just any job. I hated applying for jobs. The constant rejection. You find a job im an area where you would be able to excel. And you get turned down. I was trying to find a garage for my college placement. Ended up getting a place at the biggest garage in the district.
@@cincin4515 I should point out that it wasn't that sort of college. It was a technical college for trade skills. We are also talking 23 years ago. Back then woke meant to wake up. Now I think it means you are asleep...
I think that's a fair argument to make and certainly warrants more research. It's just important to remember that so much research has definitively proven that discrimination exists in job applications and many other settings. You can't ignore all of those studies just because you hate "woke culture"
as some has already mentioned in the comments, he's pushing an agenda about "woke-ism". of course, people often misinterpret things based on their bias, just look at people with anxiety or depression. that doesn't mean that the feeling of being oppresed is barely valid as he implies
This experiment was also executed in the worst way possible. The experiment he talks about has no experts involved and doesn't control the results with a different group of people. You can easily influence peoples perception by using the wrong words and thats what they probably did for this experiment.
@@highinfovoter8909 sure it's all in our heads. Including the heads of those prospective employers. Maybe yours is empty enough that these things pass you by?
@@justaguy3538 I’m not talking about a situation where you don’t actually have the thing. This comment is about peoples paranoia around their gender or race. You can’t stop being a black person or a woman. It’s not some thing in your head like fake scars. So you can’t say that you are seeing some thing because of a trait you don’t have like this experiment.
Its a two sided problem, in that people often are victimised in one way or another, but viewing yourself as a victim makes it easier to see victimisation around every corner. It's a tough subject without many good answers, though it does highlight the importance of attitude.
Exactly, Ru Paul, the black drag queen said this...."If you are trigger-happy and you’re looking for a reason to reinforce your own victimhood, your own perception of yourself as a victim, you’ll look for anything that will reinforce that.” According to modern standards he is wildly and utterly oppressed... I'm pretty sure he has run into issues before, but he has an amazing attitude.
True. Essentially, it's a trauma-like response. You experience discrimination many times at one point in your life, you expect it to come that many times later on, unless you don't just stop experiencing discrimination, but someone actually affirms you and gives you proper self-confidence (as opposed to going too far and giving you an excessively heightened ego), in which case you're more able to tell which is actual discrimination and which is just badly worded or not discriminatory at all.
@@moondust2365 The scary thing this study showed is that it doesnt have to be the result of real discrimination or trauma though. Just living in a culture that lies to you about the discrimination you will face makes you more likely to invent discrimination.
A person who has *suddenly* experienced something that alters their idea of who they are as a person, isn't going to act the same way as a person who was born a certain way, and has been navigating their whole life as such. Even if the scars were real, the people would act differently, due to the newness of the change to who they are, than someone who had had scars for a lifetime.
This was a test on self-confidence, not discrimination. Simple resume studies have been done as well. People with ethnic sounding names received a lot fewer calls than people with white names, and with the same experience and qualifications.
Why do you think white people can't also have ethnic-sounding names, like Sergei? Also...do you think someone with a name like Kleitus or Bubba (someone who sounds like a white redneck) would get as many calls as someone named Tom? I'm sure they wouldn't. People are naturally attracted to things they're familiar with. "Tom" is a more familiar-sounding name than "Sergei." Also, people are biased in favor of names that are easy to say and easy to spell: studies have shown that people are more likely to buy stock in companies that have simple, easy-to-pronounce names, like Apple. That's not racism...that's just the quirks of the human brain.
This is one of the biggest reasons racism is still alive. People are trained to look for it in everything from birth. Most often it isn't there but People will think it is
I like the part where he gave a link to the actual experiment or literally any information to allow people to find it and read about the methodology themselves, and then explained what they did for the control groups and what they reported. Such transparent reporting and not at all being used to push political beliefs to an audience who won't ask questions. Like, people are treating this as established fact despite there not being any info provided that indicates the study is real(like what group carried it out, what they named the study, when it was done... literally anything that would help someone seek out the information) let alone that it was properly carried out(yeah, methodology is important as how the researchers carry out an experiment will impact the results. And, based on the lack of transparency and lack of a control group, this study seems tailor made to generate this result). But it confirms what people already believe, so why question it.
It’s not that women were lying is that they adopted the scar and became insecure themselves and acted alongside that insecurity. It’s common sense. Tell someone their breath stinks and watch how they will speak as few words as possible
@@Dedded00000 Scars are imperfections. They naturally incite insecurities. It’s like getting a bad haircut. There’s nothing inherently bad about a bad haircut, but it induces insecurity.
Yep, Jimmy's right - he's pretty much just making this up. No such study ever happened and (if you give it a moment's thought) you'd realise the experiment he describes would never work.
@@vicsaturno7274 what a strange perception of how people you have never met want to "feel". Forget the experiment, the behaviour he is talking about is easily discerned just by witnessing how people act .
more like when you're looking soo hard into studies that you have to select some study from the 80s in order to make a random point across (and you also ignore the fact that same study involved men and women but you'll selective mention just one gender to make your point)
Do you accept polls extrapolating %ages for almost 350 million people’s beliefs based on 1000 responses that may be hand picked to create the desired numbers?
@@ophello I don’t object to a bigger study and I detest polls, but I totally believe that someone unused to facial scaring would feel self conscious and project onto others an attitude not in evidence. I see it every time I am in public and someone goes off on a stranger who accidentally bumps into them. We live in a less civil world today where we ascribe intention here it may not be.
1000 is a perfectly reasonable number to do a study on that gives usable data for a population of a few hundred million. If you don’t understand statistics, you can be fooled into thinking bigger is better but the truth is 1000-3000 is ideal. If you get a sample that’s non-negligible compared to the size of the population, you actually fail to get a random sample and now the results are going to be biased to the majority. The difference in error between 100-1000 is small, and the improvement in error margin from 1-3000 is almost nothing. You can look this up if you don’t believe me
It doesn't just change how you interpret the behavior of people you interact with, it also changes how you act. which can't help but affect the entire interaction. You're not just seeing something that isn't there, sometimes you're creating it.
he's not. He's using a study from 1980. It says nothing about today. If anything it shows that women were massively discriminated against in 1980, regardless of the scars.
@Marius Malus Ding ding. It says nothing that he claims it does and sounds deeply, deeply flawed. Just another Right wing grifter or idiot preying on the layman's inability to think critically.
self perception definitely plays a role in perceived levels of discrimination I think this study would have benefitted from having a group WITH the scars to measure the levels of actual discrimination too
@@wowmazin4399 most discrimination these days is self perception. I work with troubled youth and a lot of them have been brainwashed by their parents and schools.
Except people are discriminated against and those people who generally face it are also more likely to recognise it. I've seen it myself. I never put much stock in women complaining about some men being creeps or stalking them, until I got older and entered relationships and saw it happen with my own eyes. I think we need to be cognizant of discrimination also because it is a violation of our civil rights. Unless such people are held accountable by the legal process, they will have no reason to be careful about their discrimination.
@@axa3687 not nearly as frequently as before, at least not in the West. Before me. we're forced into extreme dangerous environments and women were denied education while Irish and African Americans had some of the most frequent history of being enslaved within 200 years ago. Now if someone were to even say the wrong thing to a minority group they are given death threats. We have moved past all this stuff and everyone needs to get over the last because that is the only way to move to the future. The past should be taught in school but if u tell kids that they are discriminated against and there are only 2 people the oppressed and the oppressors then u will have a repeat of history.
The best thing we can learn from this is when we judge someone, we must ask ourselves why? The immediate effect is that we will find out more about ourselves; the second effect is we become happier.
@@Sanquinity I did a quick googling and yes, your version got more hits. Tho I can't deny that OP's version sounds a bit more fitting for some situations (and I like the fanciness of it too). Thank you for teaching me something new~.
It's easier to believe anything that aligns with your biased opinion than it is to verify if something is actually true. This study "they" did, isn't real.
I know this and I think my problem based on knowing this leads me to assuming people are not being mean to me when they actually are being mean. Its a confusing world.
i think that unless the people are taking advantage of you in some way, its always better to just assume theyre not being mean. If youre right, then those people are innocent and its fine. If youre wrong? You live in their head rent free while you go along happier in life than they ever will be.
Problem is that most of the people pontificating about not being a victim are the first ones to clutch pearls when they don’t receive the preferential treatment they feel entitled to.
@@SoundBoss5150 There is a difference between someone feeling the World owes them something, and asking for assistance or something like professional courtesy (being in the same field). Those with negative attitudes don't expect much in life, most don't have positive role models, and their heroes (who they learn from ) are the older guys who seem cool. So they justify stealing, then robbing, then looting and riots to take what must seem that every privileged person has. So they don't feel guilty.
What about a person that is actually a victim of abuse? Should we just pretend like it doesn't matter, and guilt them with toxic positivity when they open up about their struggles?
@@pineappleflow2876 …Victims of abuse don’t need to “open up” during a job interview. They may be more likely to negatively internalize things the employer said, but their inner-dialogue (which is false) is irrelevant!
I went into a job interview with a severely swollen face after having surgery. I went in and told the interview team that if they didn't make fun of my face I would hold it against them. We had a good interview, they didn't make fun of my face. I got the offer before I made it home. What I did is remove the tension around my appearance. I let them know that my appearance wasn't going to affect me.
This is so important to keep in mind. It’s like passing a group of people and they suddenly start laughing so you think it must be about you. It’s so easy to project your own thoughts and insecurities onto someone else or a situation. Personally I always try and err on the side of being nothing to do with me, because even if it is about you, it usually isn’t. Meaning it’s not personal and they would say something to anyone because they aren’t happy people. Hurt people hurt people, and if you remember that it’s easier to have understanding for why they are like that. And if anything is blatant and I have time/energy, I always try to help them be less like that if I can because if you do it right you can really make a difference in the way they think and they’ll be nicer and happier.
I guess this is why when I pass people who are laughing or any similar situation I never think it’s about me because It has never entered my mind to do that to another person. Thank you. I never thought of that.
i almost got beat up by a guy who happened to walk by me and a friend, when my friend said something funny to me and i laughed. the guy, walking down the street without a shirt in the middle of the night, stopped, turned around and went crazy on me asking why i laughed at him. he started pushing me and was extremely aggressive. he must have been on some kind of drug, i dunno how else a person could be so insecure and aggressive :D
So true. Dividing people by giving names to their physical and/or mental state and then talking about inclusiveness is the stupidest thing to do. Just treat everyone with respect.
Yes i do agree with you but i also know hiwcfreeing it feels when you know youve been ill all yr life and soneone finally gives it a name, its fantastic to know it and be able to research it and improve my life and hopefully others around me. Sadly people use diagnosis as a reason for why they behave badly and that has to end.
@@yonathansheldon2903no it's just complacency. Respect aint what those people need, it's better understanding of what theyre going through, but no one even bothers.
Treating people with respect doesn't happen, which is why there is a need for inclusiveness. Imagine if you're tired of hearing about it, imagine living it? You think people want to be mistreated? People are so comical.
"If everywhere you go it smells like sh•t, maybe it's time to check your own shoes." I see this in groups a lot, can be religious, feminist, LGBTQ, BLM, etc. If you are always on a state of alert and jump at the smallest bit of discrimination, even if it's not actually that, then you make people upset and when those people start to recognise a patron, they will get upset at the group, which is anything but helpful. It's not bad to defend yourself and talk some sense to a discriminator, but not everyone who makes a comment is actually one at heart, they can be confused or misunderstood something and the human is a prideful being so insulting them is just going to make it worse. I can't count the amount of times I have chatted with people who, even though they didn't end up agreeing with me, we were able to have a normal conversation, I explained why I supported something and they explained their concerns about the matter, no one insulted eachother, no one attacked and no one tried to make the other feel dumb. Is it that hard to have a civil conversation and stop victimising yourself?
^ ^ this !! ^ ^ l too do this all the time.. it promotes unity as a people.. we be different, but we also are the same.. and connecting like that hopefully is passed along.. (ihisi)
@Siegfried Sieger I know that feeling too, my friend. If a may offer some help, take care of yourself, find a productive skill you can master, and socialize when you can to build yourself up. It's not everything, but it's a start 👍
Years ago i was the only asian in the office. I came into work one monday morning, a coworker gently asked for a quiet word, we went into an empty office, she then started telling me how she had been stressing all weekend, couldnt sleep, hadnt eaten, and felt sick, because of what she said to me on friday and thought that i must have been feeling the same all weekend (i hadnt). I was like "whatchu talkin bout willis", genuinely had no idea what she said and she didnt want to repeat it because it was so nasty. I laughed and told her i had no recollection and that we were good, she didnt believe me but i reassured her. Later on other coworkers asked if i was ok etc etc. I can see how some people are primed for victim hood. I just wanted to play video games.
Saaame. I'm an imported latino here in the states, a co-worker thought it'd be a great idea to go for some tacos and asked me which ones my favorite. Loved her face when I told her down in south america tacos aren't a thing. She immediately assumed I got severely offended or something and another co-worker was also so worried about it because she was the one to come up with the idea of going out to eat Latinx good food with me (she actually said latin-ex) and I had to correct her, real latinos hate being called latin-ex and we find that racist and offensive, but thinking every latino loves tacos is just absolutely normal because we just assume muricans are extremely ignorant about anything outside the planet earth, i.e. USA.
@@rRekko Its more based on the fact that people in the United States have very little interaction with people actually from south america, and their cultures aren't in a ton of media. Id assume you know next to nothing about the cultures of people in say the baltic regions or east africa, but you likely have good/decent knowledge about the United kingdom, Russia, China, India. Even though you lived nowhere close to them. Most people around the world are too busy living their lives to learn about people thousands of miles away, who aren't a major impact on their day to day lives, this is not exclusively a murican thing. They can heck off with that latin-ex though.
How can you be a victim if you don’t even know what happened? You don’t know what she said and she wouldn’t repeat it. How is this story relevant to being a victim?
Of course, this doesn't measure whether someone with scars WOULD actually be treated differently. Having interviewed people for positions, I'd say it is very difficult to remove personal grooming and appearance from your assessment and concentrate on their qualifications.
The experiment wasn't to check whether or not someone with obvious scars is discriminated against, it was to show that if you feel like a victim or if you are constantly told you are a victim you will take everything adverse as an attack.
@@PixelSageYTwell yeah, they had a "victim mentality" because the experiment asked them to look for discrimination, and it's very hard to do this kind of experiment without giving away the fact it's about discrimination, and there was apparently no accounting for changes in behaviour from the participants, it's basically not a good study lol
@@cd8048 The point is that they primed people to look for discrimination. So everything that happened regardless of actual discrimination they attributed to them being the victim and discriminated against. Its a parallel to today's society where people are constantly being told they are victims and always feeling attacked or slighted. It isn't an exact science or a study, but more of a social experiment.
@@PixelSageYT yes the idea is simple but I'm saying the guy is an idiot lol 😂 obviously coopting the social science phenomenon of priming into a political message
@PixelSage no, they were told to look for discrimination specifically so they looked for it I don't think any of the people with scars were acting like victims they were just doing what they were told
I LOVE these types of experiments. I wish we would all sit back and reflect on what these results tell us. Now, I've got to find this experiment to confirm what was said here.
As a scared up man I can honestly say the average person is uncomfortable around someone with visible scars or disabilities it's on the "scared" to deal with it, it's just human nature
I guess it depends on your environment . I dated a man for around 7 years who was burned over 90 percent of his body, including his face.He also had lost half an arm and his other arm and hand were burned badly as well. He said he was never discriminated against for it ,that he was aware of anyway, and rarely did he notice any people who were outwardly uncomfortable around him. Maybe people were uncomfortable but they didn't show it. Many people may have opinions based on what they have experienced and it seems like one thing is normal to some and not to others. There can be a lot of anecdotal evidence for situations.
I have 6 skin grafts on my face alone from skin cancer excisions; first ones in 2008 and latest ones in January this year with more to follow. Being naturally fair skinned, the donor sites have always been areas that have not seen much sun at all -for I have an appendectomy scar where I never had my appendix removed lol - so there is a significant colour match for most of them. I can say in all honesty that strangers are uncomfortable around me and agree completely that that is exactly how society has programmed us. BUT.... it has never affected me at any job interview. Maybe because I am a guy?
The people you deal with are probably scared to say something about your scars or look like they are fixating on them. Not because they are scared of you. They don't want you to feel offended.
Humans, sadly are just naturally frightened by other humans who look radically different from most, especially from injury. On some primitive level we fear going through the same thing. But 100% agree that we should be empathetic and see past that with our conscious mind instead of our innate fears.
This is the only reference I’ve seen to this study from a reputable source (the NYT): “Dr. Robert Cleck, a psychologist at Dartmouth College, has devised an experiment that illustrates how body image affects how people think. Using theatrical makeup, researchers fashioned a scar on female subjects before their interaction with a stranger hired for the experiment. Unbeknown to the women, the scar was removed before the face-to-face conversation with the stranger. Nevertheless, the women said the stranger had stared at the scar and made them uncomfortable.” They reported discomfort, not discrimination.
So what you're saying is that this guy was primed by his preexisting belief that "wokeism" is a problem, to read more into this study than was really there?
Your perception creates your reality. I always remind myself of that and my experiences as a Black person have been very unique. I refuse to feel oppressed and restricted. I refuse that reality. ✌🏾♥️
Yup, people need to get past themselves and have internal confidence. What we have in the world today is a lack of knowing everyone is a beautiful child of God and we have every right to be confident knowing so. Love one another, help one another and love yourself.
Problem with all "We need to have theses" just as the "We need to be tolerant" is that is will mostly reflect in those that want to be that way, people that have no moral compass, children, the unread, will continue to discriminate freely at their leisure. Do Videogames increase violence? No, violent games appeal to people of that mentality, its an outlet of something thats already there.
Preach! I actually have a recent facial scar from surgery, and I just go on being my usual self, but I was very surprised to find most people didn't even notice it!
Everybody notice dude, or it might really be unnoticable. But as someone who was burned on one half of my face, a lot of people ask me about it all the time, i just dont belive you😂
I got a laceration near my eye from a biking accident that needed 19 stitches. Just got them taken out today. Pretty mixed feelings about it. I hope it heals well. I know I just need to accept it but I wish it never happened.
@@benjaminmolnar3881 get some silicon gel or silicon patches. Make sure to massage the scar daily. This really helps make your scar fade. I've been doing it with mine and it's faded a bunch and no longer feels ropey after 2 months.
@XWierdThingsHappenX I got the Mederma advanced scar gel, I was told to use it after the wound closes. You think this is good? Would you recommend something else?
@@benjaminmolnar3881 I would recommend actual silicon gel. Which has been clinicly proven to help reduce scars. Mederma hasn't been as throughly tested. The number one recommend is silicon.
Should have recorded the interviews and shown the ladies their body langue and facial expressions and ask them questions about how they were feeling in that moment believing they had something wrong with them and how it changed the way they behaved in the interview.
They did record the "interviews" which weren't actually interviews. This study did not happen anything like what Kisin, the man in this video, is describing. He misrepresented both the method and the results. Maybe that's why he didn't say what the study was, or who conducted it. The study is called, Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued characteristics on social interaction by Robert Kleck of Dartmouth College 1980
@@kim-urban-edwards2083 its a real study, limited, and grossly misrepresented in this video, but it did happen. Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued characteristics on social interaction
@@kim-urban-edwards2083 exactly: For one, it's not an experiment because they didn't have a control group. Second, he makes a leap to his conclusion on objective data based on unrelated subjective data: We don't know if the discrimination exists because they didn't do that experiment, only that they felt discriminated based on their observations; but their observations were manipulated by being lied to about their appearance. Discrimination statistics have nothing to do with "feelings" they have to do with observable, objective data regarding hiring practices.
1000% TRUTH! Same with micro aggressions and unconscious bias. Not that these things don’t happen, but the degree to which people are victims of these things vs reality.
That’s not exactly how the Dartmouth scar experiment was conducted, and that is not the conclusion that came out of the study. Yes the participants did have different gaze patterns when they thought they had a scar. Or in other words, yes they felt more self conscious. But that study did not prove that discrimination doesn’t exist. Which is the unfortunate awful take from this whole “anti-woke” movement.
@@justadude1443 Thanks for speaking up about this is well. While this “there is no discrimination” propaganda movement is nothing new, I’ve been noticing it more and more on social media. Just hoping not a lot of people buy into the BS as the consequence is we start seeing further support for legislation that marginalizes groups of people. Another critique of this video is it primarily targets women where the study was actually near equal parts men and women, with slightly more men. If you’re stumbling on this discussion, pay attention to videos like these, find the actual studies (not news articles as there are too many propaganda sites that zero in on obscure topics like these and amplify false narratives). Dispel the negative connotation of “wokeism” as it is simply a propaganda campaign to ensure valid complaints and concerns cannot be recognized.
Moreover, the study actually included both sexes with more male participants than female (27:21). Stating that a group of women perceived a discriminatory bias where there couldn't have been any is rather disingenuously suggesting that women are more prone to this phenomenon when in fact there may have been no difference between either group. He does himself no service when he uses a study to support his narrative but misinforms the audience about the said study.
@@DonnyNoMarie No, we're saying the world is not black and white and we should be very very careful of how we view and measure it. Balance in all things.
It's called confirmation bias: when you find what you were looking for because you were looking for it and not because it was there anyway.
The only thing this experiment proves is confirmation bias can affect the experiment. Right now your confirmation bias is allowing you to believe that discrimination doesnt exist when it does. Why are we trying to tell people to give people the benefit of the doubt when its not warranted.
So if he was lying, and this study never actually happened but you want to believe it does because "woke" people are bad or something, would that not mean you are actually demonstrating confirmation bias by buying into the narrative that "wokeism" is bad BECAUSE this study is 100% false but you believe it because it's what you look for in the left's behavior?
That's not an example of confirmation bias. Self fulfilling prophecy is a better description
@@manuelmanolo7099 What prophecy are they self fulfilling?
@@manuelmanolo7099 that's exactly confirmation bias and "self-fullfiling prophecy" lol isn't even a thing
Just looked up the study. This is a fantastic example of bias. If you think of yourself as a victim, you'll find that you see yourself being victimized virtually everywhere you go.
Any link to it?
Were the interviewers in on the study? Were they genuine interviews? It could be that the interviewers were instructed to make loaded statements or ask loaded questions to fit in with the object of the study.
@Royston Richards Then the women would not be complaining about perceived slights; there would have been actual slights.
As the study was to see if people felt they were being victimised when they were not, they would have to be very careful not to ask questions or in any way give the impression that they were victimising the women. The interviewers would have to be impartial, most likely reading from a script, so each woman would have the same experience. The amount of "adlibbing" would be zero, I suspect. Any deviation from the script between interviews would invalidate the whole experiment.
I just looked for it and couldn't find that study. Would you give the reference for it please. There are multiple studies showing discrimination against men and women with facial disfigurement. People with facial disfigurement feel mortified. The women who thought they had fake scars could not possibly all acted as "their normal selves" as they didn't feel normal and had a rational belief they were liable to be treated differently.
Following
"If you go around constantly looking for things to be offended by, you'll find them."
What is truly amazing is the amount of people, who feel they are exempt from this...
Or racial issues which are real or perceived
But if people weren't actually being discriminated against in the first place those people would not be looking for discrimination.
Think about the fact that white people under the same circumstances don't feel that way. It's because they do not generally face discrimination so it's not something to look for.
Here is an example.
I live in Canada and in more than 30 years of driving I have been stopped by the cops a total of THREE times all for speeding. I was speeding.
Last year I decided to visited my sister in Florida and between Ontario and Florida. I was stopped a total of 18 times. I ha e 360 cameras on my car which records sound inside and out. I have external speakers so I don't need roll my windows down but it seems to me that a black man driving a Maserati is a magnet for American ops.
So now every time I cross the border and I see a cop I expect him to stop me and when he does I immediately think it's racially motivated.
If a Canadian cop stops me I would never think that no matter his race.
Do this little experiment as interesting as it may be is really saying absolutely nothing about the realities of human interactions.
@@jussayinmipeece1069
"But if people weren't actually being discriminated against in the first place those people would not be looking for discrimination. "
Have you met a Radical Evangelical Christian?
@@Steelmage99 lol. My bad.
But you get me though😳🤣🤣🤣
Literally black America today. We’re all thinking it no one is saying it
Nothing like black south africa my man, thats all we know here, victims apon victims
So if you watched your grandparents and your parents get beat up by cops dog's turned loose on thim and even sometimes children. Redlining exc. You are not a victim? Well you clearly don't have a good concept of time. 19th century is not gone just in ower rear view meror. Healing takes time isn't that ironic?
Except that this man is describing the results incorrectly. The experiment PREDICTED complaints of bias but found NONE. Read for yourself. Kleck and Strenta, 1985, for reference
@@ramonmcgee2240 You are referring to the wrong experiment. This one is "Perceptions of the Impact of Negatively Valued Physical Characteristics on Social Interaction" by Kleck and Strenta (1980)
@@davidbroadfoot1864 Roger that. I read the study you referenced (the full report.) The interesting thing about the juxtaposition of the Kleck study and the speaker's point is that the "disfigurement" was apparent to the test subjects and then surreptitiously removed. In the context of race, it can hardly be denied that physical attributes associated with minorities has not been social and historical laced with demeaning and degrading descriptors. In that sense it cannot be said that the "disfigurement" is only the minds of minorities. In the Kleck test, there was no disfigurement to be viewed by the testors. That is not the case socially and historically for majority members looking at minorities.
Any details on the study? Like effect size, sample size, what journal it was published in, or if there was a control. Those are all very important for interpreting the results of just about any study.
Exactly. I'd also like to see if they did the exact same experiment with a group of men. Or if there was a control group setting for comparison (since he mentions 'increased', but compared to what?).
Very important for twisting the results to somehow be racist
@@ootdega are you familiar with the concept of peer review?
@@ootdega If you're already biased before seeing the results, you're not doing a good job.
@@mattdombrowski8435 Yes. I am also familiar with the reality that "peer review" is just as much of a political tool as anything else in current year.
There was a fake study done to "prove" that men were the cause of literally every single problem in society. Everything in it was literally made up. It was peer reviewed and published based exclusively by its title and conclusion.
“If you look for the light, you can often find it. But if you look for the dark, that is all you will ever see.” ~Iroh
10/10 comment/ quote lol. This sums up a lot of what’s wrong with the world these days. 👍🏻
oh year, th Legend of Korra
leaves on the vine, falling so slow
Amen
@@vantaestheticslike fragile tiny shells, drifting in the foam
This is also a good lesson in self esteem.
That's why part of an interview is being told to look your best, because when you look your best you feel your best.
It's a lesson to become a Nationalist and seek Jesus, since everywhere else you go is the synagogue of satan.
Look it up. This "experiment" never happened. It was literally made up. Don't you wonder why it's so vague, no clips, no actual testimony? Because it isn't real THIS GUY JUST MADE SOMETHING UP TO GET ANGRY ABOUT
This has absolutely nothing to do with self-esteem 😅
@@ltsgobrando yea it actually does. If you had any braincells you would understand that
This is so true, I worked in dermatology for years, women would come in with complaints of horrible disfigurement on their faces. When asked where they would ask for a mirror to point out where the problem was. Our mirrors were normal and 2x magnification. They would then demand a 10x magnification mirror so they could find the spot that "everyone was staring at" I always wanted to know who all these people were carrying 10x magnifiers to star at people were.
Yes, those mirrors are oppressive!
@@suew4609 2x and 10x more oppressive than your average mirror :)
isn't this also claled the "blue dot effect"?
@@Bloodhoven I've never heard that term before.
@@JGDD7190 look it up. there are 2 to 3 minute videos on yt summing it up. pretty interesting. basically it's about people being more and more hyperfixated and paranoid avout things. best example: especially here in the western world we're living in literally one of the safest periods humanity EVER lived in. and yet people (especially women) over the last 2 decades startes to feel as unsafe as they did the last time over 100 years ago, because they hyperfocus on increasingly trivial things and make them bigger than they actually are.
My dad once said: if you think EVERYONE is against you, then there's something wrong with YOU.
As a general life rule that's true but not when facing a mob, an increasingly common social confrontation these days.
Tell that to Jews from Nazzi times.
But I know there is some truth to your statement.
@@pichelen This answer is both for you and the other comment. You are confusing a GROUP with EVERYONE. Nazis were a group, not EVERYONE. GROUPS tend to follow the same ideology, so a GROUP will act (wait for it) AS A GROUP.
If the whole Planet Earth would've hated and acted as the Nazis against the Jews, then your statement would've been right. But at least 90% of the world condemned the Nazis.
@@pichelen Everyone wasn't against them. Not even the military let alone every citizen. All of that is from the SS officers, many of whom were executed in trial.
Yep, reality is most people you think don’t like you may not even notice you exist because they are only thinking about themselves.
And the reverse is true too: if you constantly believe the ideology of victimhood is behind typical claims of discrimination, you can ignore discrimination which ought to be staring you in the face. The door swings both ways. But pretending it doesn’t is a good excuse not to have to think about prejudice or privilege, ever.
Beautifully said. This is very true
This is the sort of thing that people pushing blanket ststements like him seem to conviently forget about.
Very true. The worst part is, people are very aware of it. There are people who will use the ideology of Victimhood to dismiss any disagreements about how people are treated, but there are also people who will falsify oppression because they know it will be taken seriously and use it as a tool for personal gain rather than getting someone help they need.
Both of these types of people make the other side point and go "look, see! We were right! You all are really oppressors/professional victims!"
It's made a rather simple issue way more complicated than it ever should have been and it frankly pisses me off.
@@umbrellabirb3206 Growing up undiagnosed autistic and realising one day that “not everyone gets bullied for seemingly no reason” was really depressing
It's almost like nuance exists in all things, and rash generalizations somehow miss these....
The study is "Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction.", by Robert Kleck and Angelo Strenta.
*Edited with the correct study after someone pointed it out.
You are a hero. Thank you.
You are the MVP
Are you joking? I had to listen to this 3 times before I understood what he was saying! 😂😮😂
Thank you for citing the study.
You look for Evil You'll find it.
You look for good you'll find it.
Perfect analogy . now get this out to the entire world.
Since nobody here wanted to link to it, the study is called Perceptions of the Impact of Negatively Valued Characteristics on Social Interaction, it was published November 1980. It actually consisted of four studies.
Broadly speaking, the participants who had been primed to believe they had a visible disfigurement (not all were given the scar, some were told that the interviewer was told they some non-visible deviancy such as allergies) were more likely to focus on gaze behavior in social situations.
Importantly, the authors went on to point out in their conclusion that this modification in behavior by the test subjects for an experiment that involved temporarily interacting with one person while believing to be showing a physical impairment may not be consistent with the behavior patterns of individuals who live with physical disfigurement full time.
Quote from the conclusion to the study:
"The leap from these results, therefore, to
the conclusion that they support Wright's
(1960) assertion that physically handicapped persons are often prone to articulate their social
reality entirely in terms of their handicap, even when the objective facts do not support such a construction, is tenuous at best."
In short, this study really doesn't support the conclusion implied in this short. At best, it opens the door to further studies to determine if this is a valid conclusion or not.
www.researchgate.net/publication/232481827_Perceptions_of_the_impact_of_negatively_valued_characteristics_on_social_interaction
Been honestly trying to articulate something along these lines the study did seem to focus nocebo induced self conciousness in someone whi hadnt previously had to deal with it rather than the framing of someone who does
At least thats what i got from the shorts summary
Thank you. :)
I found an extension on this study from 1998.
'The effects of having a facial scar on state self-esteem and face-to-face social interactions'
"targets were rated as more tense in the scar believe condition than in the no scar condition. There was, however, no support for a self-fulfilling prophecy theory"
But most of the people who watch this short will take it at face value and apply it by and large to social inequalities and assert that this proves that social inequality does not exist, specifically racism and sexism…
underrated comment. thank you!
The study is called" Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction" by Kleck and Strena (1980) . Its important to note that theres no interview, no use of discrimination language or asked how they were discriminated, and there was more than just scarring, such as epilepsy. They were asked how they felt the interaction with the person they talked to went and what they were thinking at the time, it was more the internal conflict more than the actual subject of discussion, ie they felt stressed and nervous about the scarring and felt self conscious. Interesting study, shame its misrepresented to try and shut down the "woke crowd".
Thanks for taking the time to clarify.
When someone cites a study, without naming the exact source, it's always a bit sketchy.
Thank you! Already gave this video a thumbs up but changed it to down after reading your comment.
I'm glad there's still people on UA-cam capable of critical thinking and actually understanding how to read studies 😅
So, are you sure this is the study, and that this is the ONLY study?
All that proves is that confirmation bias is a thing and if you tell people they're in a study of discrimination they're going to be actively looking for signs of discrimination.
isn't that the exact point he made? If you tell people they are always facing discrimination, they are going to be looking for signs of discrimination. This effect works both ways, in that telling someone they are a victim causes them to actively look for signs, but also being on the receiving end of even a small amount of discrimination can also create this effect.
Ok, well, people get discriminated against all the time. It is happening, and it's causing certain people who are under certain circumstances to fail. There really isn't anything we really can do to completely stop it either.
No, the point this short seems to be getting across is that the discrimination people face is actually made up; however, the study basically conditioned the women to look for possible discrimination, making it a biased and worthless study if you are attempting to prove said point.
@@miclowgunman1987 As if discrimination was the same as confirmation bias? No.
Where have I seen this movie before?
@@miclowgunman1987 I think the point of the comment is that this will happen to any study even if it's not about discrimination.
this doesn't say much about how we think discrimination is happening when it's not. it just shows if we look for something specific our brains will make connections even if there is none
ex: if you start the day off thinking it's bad you will probably only notice the bad stuff that happens
Absolutely true. Victimhood is nowadays a high status marker.
Or the lack of empathy towards other people who suffer that leads to the refusal of accountability for the well-being of others that leads to the cruelty we now see in our society.
It’s definitely not a status marker, people just think it is and the left begrudgingly now goes along with it since they championed it for so long.
But I can’t name anyone who looks up to someone with a victim complex.
That's right...everyone's a victim today there's a lot of weak minded people around today
@@manuelzeferino2950You need your pills.
Cruelty that we now see in our society?
I would firmly believe that we have never lived in a less cruel society, think about it?
To say otherwise is to completely make us into 'victims'.
Now ask people with REAL facial scarring if they face discrimination. The answer, I guarantee, is yes.
There's a post right next to yours where they say their scars never caused them to be discriminated against 😂
Not nearly as much as you would think.
@@bobbyhempel1513 depends on the scarring. Small ones, probably not. But huge gashes, far more likely.
Though it does depend on the job. If your face is covered in scars, you wont easily get a job dealing with people.
?
@@handsomelarsandhisfabulousjars i dont think scars are seen as bad in general? it works for this experiment, because its only about the perception, but in reallife with people that have scars i dont think its generally seen as negative
As a woman with actual scars on my face due to a car accident when I was a child, I can say that some and I do mean some people do discriminate. Most look more for what you can do for them than what you look like.
Yeah, but as the experiment suggests, I believe you should not think that THAT'S the default of what people think about you. Those 'mean' people were some special cases/the anomaly/the unsual. There are many of them, but they're not the default. It's healthier to think this way.
I mean, people care a lot more about your general looks than any scars, it's a subconscious thing.
Sure, not everyone is a perfect angel and there will be bad apples out there but I think we should never try to assume bigotry as the first thing to come to mind whenever something like this happens.
For every person who would descriminate against your scars there is another person who won't and if you always assume bigotry then that's a very unfair generalization.
The discriminations exist. But this ahort video isn't talking about that.
Like it barely deny it.
This. Discrimination exists but sometimes people who are insecure will see it where it’s not
As someone with actual facial deformities, I can confirm you get treated differently. Not in a good way. You'd think only children who don't know any better will point, snicker, and say something about you, NOPE adults do it too. It's just sad when adults do it because they _should_ know better.
Can I ask you question..Don't you find it easier if kids ask you instead of just staring. I know some people isn't always in the mood to answer but I find when younger kids asked and they get their answers they move on and the staring stops whereas adults are worse then kids. They ignorantly stare and will do it till you randomly ask what's up
As an artist, I've always wanted to ask about deformities, especially the facial ones, as I find them very cool and interesting, but I always ignore it and just interact normally cuz I don't want to make anyone uncomfortable, and i especially dont want to direct bystander's attention to it. Maybe the only people who don't make fun are the people most interested, haha.
@@6ColourMeRainbow9 I have lots of facial scarring and a skin condition. I think its difficult topic cuz I rlly don't mind if people ask about it, but I now its a personal preference. its always about time and place I guess. if u hardly know someone probs none of ur business to ask or bringing it up if ur in a big group. I mostly find myself bringing it up when I know someone reasonably well. but asking kindly is always welcome personally as I know the people that ask are interested and curious and not people who would silently judge. :)
But you’re missing the point. No one is arguing that people with deformities are not treated differently. It is about how people can talk themselves into being treated badly because of a deformity that doesn’t even exist! Very clever study.
@Odi Etamo they don't talk themselves into being treated differently. The women in this study perceived discrimination and comments based on facial scarring, while there were none as there were no scars.
This is true. It's part of what makes discrimination so insidious. The fact that one might internalize their oppression does not necessarily mean that they are not being oppressed. This means that those from marginalized communities have to navigate both their own expectation of oppression as well as actual oppression. It is not, however, a reason to ignore the reality of discrimination in our society. It is rather yet another reason to call it out and take responsibility for it. Just imagine how the expectations of the participants in the study would have changed if they grew up in a culture that did not discriminate against people with scars. So you see, it is the discrimination that is the problem, not calling it out. Ignoring it makes it worse
@whocriesforbidennotme641 Indeed. I'm not sure in what way you disagree with what I said.
It adds another layer to the suffering caused by discrimination. Therefore, you can be understanding and cut people a little slack when they are overly sensitive. And, you can do your best to be aware of the fact that sometimes we can act in discriminatory ways without consciously intending to do so
People nowadays aren't easily offended. They're eagerly offended.
I think by "nowadays" you meant "throughout all of human history."
@@linksbetweendrinks7032people weren’t getting offended in the 1600s 🤦♂️
@@R11T16_i mean....the nobles probably get offended when a peasant simply breathes on em
this! so true 😂
@@linksbetweendrinks7032 did I offend you?
the one thing i learned in social research is that if they TELL YOU WHAT THEYRE LOOKING FOR, it's misdirection.
that and they are women ☕️
@@bxyxg not that all women would, but most men wouldn't
Keys.
"If you think everyone around you is judging you, then you might be the one judging them by assuming the worst of their character." - from a website I visited
My wife does that to me from time to time. I bought a loaf of bread a few weeks ago to make sandwiches for lunch at work that week. She fussed at me and called me a snob because i bought a loaf of bread different from her loaf of bread. I told her i bought it to make sandwiches to take to work. A week and a half later i told her she owed me an apology because i had eaten the entire loaf of bread. She smiled and didn't say anything. Good thing she's not like this all the time i would have divorced her 20 years ago
Pornhub... i didnt know they were that deep 😳
Being honest with myself I discovered I had fallen into this habit
@@brianstrutter1501 I would say: " I am snob, so what??? I save money being snob."
So absolutely everyone is judging everyone else
I used to do air conditioning and one day I was given a helper. It was a young girl that had a little bit of experience because her dad owned an ac business and yes, she knew how to do her job. She got paid the same as me but did about half the work I did because she wasn't strong enough to lift up the air conditioners or the condensers but she could crawl through the attics better than I could. I got paid for my strength, she got paid for her size.
🤔
Nice! If you want to narrow the pay gap, you need to bring just as much to the table.
Was up in an attic for much of the day yesterday, and would have happily traded it for heavy lifting...
Sounds like you’re all for what those video is speaking against. You’re acting like you’ve been victimized because a woman wasn’t as strong as you. She probably did all the other work, poor, oppressed white guy.
@@Callofthevoid3 wow...talk about completely missing the point. You are a prime example of what's wrong with this world. You see someone giving praise to another person, but because of your preconceived ideas, all you can see is negativity. How sad for you.
Imagine one woman deviates from the experiment and goes, “ You wanna know how I got these scars ?”
The interviewer sat there like ,
” I’m sorry , what ? “
underrated comment. This should get more likes. The classic joker dialog 😂😂😂
Most reasonable comment here.
That's probably why they chose women instead of men
@@jaglinuxmint "And the result of the experiment is that we now have like 130 female Jokers running around causing havoc... But it's okay, we're gonna do another experiment where we tell a bunch of trust fund babies their parents were shot leaving the movies."
@@Nympho4Hire 🤣🤣🤣 that's hilarious.
He is right, on a systematic level its imporant to not play the victim. HOWEVER, systemically its important to recognize that massive unjust inequalities still exist regardless of attitude.
honestly this feels more like it proves a person, who has never been discriminated against, thinks they know what discrimination is like.
Best case scenario it proves that it's difficult to tell when someone is discriminating against you, nothing to do with the actual fact that discrimination exists
Good thing there is little to no discrimination now, most of it is actually against white straight people, complete overcorrection.
Humans will naturally discriminate because it is in our nature.
It's not systemic.
@@juice6521 even those freedom fighters who are fighting against discrimination, they discriminate heavyly many people :D
I do have a facial scar. As a kid, people , usually boys, commented on it and made fun of me. I was about 29 when i no longer cared what people thought. A coworker commented the other day on the scar and was shocked that im not self-conscious about it. I told her i had a long time to get over insecurities of things i cannot control
So up until 29 you claimed victim hood according to this video.
@@MrHorserider15Having insecurities and "claiming victimhood" are two, distinct things. This is where your critical thinking skills come in:
How could you be insecure about a scar you know you don't really have though? I don't see how this experiment would be tainted by insecurity, I think it is a good example of victimhood as they were primed with the idea that they will be judged.
Edit: just realized I commented a reply, I wasn't targeting the op of this comment, just that some people argue that this experiment is tainted by insecurity which i doubt.
People notice, but they don't care. They may be curious about it though.
@@archive8080that’s just not true. Some don’t care, some are curious, and some are cruel about it. There’s always at least those 3, maybe a mix of them, and maybe something else.
I’ve know people with disabilities that were stay at home and draw a check bad and had difficult jobs that were very demanding but acted like it no big deal. That’s true wealth. I remember one lady that would get up from her desk, got on crutches and come to the counter to wait on me. She always had a smile and treated me like I was the only customer she had all day. She doesn’t even know how that affected me even today. ❤
I get what you’re trying to say here, but as a multi disabled person who works in advocacy, I’m absolutely begging you to hear me out when I say that *this is damaging*.
That’s not playing victim-that’s just a fact.
Disabled people are constantly praised for “not letting their disabilities define them” but do you know what that results in?? Burnout. Increased chronic pain. Depression. Anxiety. Ostracism. Poor hygiene and diet. Terrible sleep. More medications…
The only time we seem to be appreciated is when we have something “valuable” to offer because if we don’t, then we’re considered deadweights to society.
@@All_Im_Saying_Is You are describing "burnout" for anyone, not just disabled, who have tried to do
their absolute best for a long time.
The interviewer probably commented on their expressions of fear, paranoia, and lack of confidence. I think it was real.
thats the point..
It wasn't even about interviews. This man is lying about the study and how it was presented and what the raw findings might indicate. You can look the study up. It's not like he says. Makes you wonder why he'd be so deceptive.
@@cs5384 How do we know YOU aren’t lying?
Why don’t you provide a quote to confirm your claims?
Maybe YOU are the one being deceptive.
@@cs5384 how about you make it easier for us to access the info by providing a link🤗🤗
@@cs5384 What in the world are you talking about?? The study was described exactly as he does, in “The New York Times”…..It was conducted at Dartmouth University in 1991, with 27 participants. The results were exactly what has been revealed in this post. Why are you seemingly lying about this? What is your agenda?
I agree with the dangers of victimhood. But you cant ignore the actual experience of being a victim. Some Persons arent preached discrimination they experience it.
And? They didn't say that discrimination is impossible, they just said that if you look for discrimination you will find it in things that are not discriminatory.
And most people "experience" discrimination because they are told it exists literally everywhere and they are a poor innocent victim who needs special treatment.
In current year, "discrimination" is refusing to install a litter box in the school restroom because you identify as a cat.
The point is that without objective observation it's virtually impossible to tell because of confirmation bias.
That's not the point of the video. He's simply pointing out that if people believe they are being oppressed, they will feel oppression whether it's there or not. Teaching people that they are at a disadvantage when they are not, really hamstrings society.
We have way too many minorities that believe they are living unhappy lives due to white privilege, and women believing they can't achieve success due to a patriarchy.
There's nothing stopping minorities from pursuing an education and starting a business and investing their money. In fact, it's easier for them to pursue an education due to minority scholarships and affirmative action.
If anything, there's a real case of minority privilege, rather than white privilege. White males face more criticism and oppression than any other group in the US. It seems anything they do that is within their nature is considered toxic masculinity, and any success they achieve was the result of privilege. They can't win.
@@vvhitevvabbit6479 this must be the most dumb comment I have read in a while. oh while males are so oppressed even though stats show otherwise. you are the perfect example of confirmation bias
As a woman who has a scar on my forehead, I have never felt discriminated because of it. I actually became topic of conversation. People ask me how i got the Harry Potter scar 😆
Same here I have a scar on my forehead. I wish people wouldn't feel bad for me though.
So how did you get that scar on your forehead?
"If you think I got a scar out of it you should see how Lord Volde--- I mean, yea I could tell you the story."
hehe, same here ^^
Ah so ur the one who lived
The men had a heightened sense of confidence.
Visual proof of past hardship gives credit to the wisdom and advice you share. It's the opposite of narcissism.
I had a friend with terrible facial scars, she was lovely, her personality not only made her scars of no consequence but she often said that she believed she got treated better simply because people felt sorry for her, which i thought was so sad :( but at the same time i appreciated that people tried so hard to not make her feel conscious of it, such a conundrum, so its difficult for people to react because either way can be deemed as wrong.
You're doing exactly what he said. You're making her scars everything. You're even "so sad" because people treat her nicely. You're definitely playing the victim about something that doesn't even affect you.
There is 2 ways to go. You can either try and pretend you didn't notice, or you can acknowledge the elephant in the room.
@@cincin4515 and you're just a clod.
@@cincin4515Well they said 'no consequence' about the scars so I'd have to disagree 😮
So what you're saying is that the West is so out of touch with reality that they're so afraid to speak the truth out of fear of hurting her so called feelings? I would wonder if she got into those jobs by being a charity case then. In my country, she would be grilled with how she'd interact with the company or the team. If she showed any signs of being a problem, she would never make it pass the initial interview.
I work in retail, so part of working in retail is greeting the customers and checking to see if they need anything. There were a few instance where I would check on someone and they would immediately say “I’m not stealing so you don’t have to follow me” or “I promise there’s nothing in my bag.” It always leaves me speechless.
Richard Nixon once said "I am not a criminal."
I just had this a couple of months ago. I was the only person on the sales floor and so had to help customers and ring them out. I also had a cart of back stock to put on the shelves right where this lady was. I went into the aisle just to be there to help and took advantage of that time to get things on the shelf. She left and it looked like she was headed toward the register. I started back and she said she felt like I was following her. I told her no, and after I checked her out, I apologized for appearing that way. She thanked me for the apology. Having said that, I did nothing wrong to have to apologize. It was in her mind. I've done this with many people over seven years or more and have never had anyone say this.
You should understand some ppl definitely do get profiled when shopping and it makes you feel like a dog. So please give them grace, we can't tell who's being nice and who's just keeping an eye on us thinking we are nothing but a dirty thief, it tends to make you a bit defensive.
@@sol-leks6122exactly! When i was in retail my manager always said "the best way to prevent shoplifting is good customer service."
That's when you know they're up to something
i feel like this only works if there also was a group that actually kept the scars, so that we can compare it to something.
also self perception is a different thing, i wanna see results of which group was more likely to get hired.
edit: this blew up and i am obviously not gonna read everything.
just adding that i didn't mean to criticize the study. i understand the study itself is about perception, but in the context it is used for in the video makes it sound like people who say they face discrimination only have it all in their head.
This, its no good claiming discrimination is in our heads without gathering the data on the percentage of people with actual disfigurements that got hired vs those without. Yes sometimes we victimise ourselves, but this video seems to be saying that discrimination doesn't actually happen when it most certainly does
Sure, but it sounds like the experiment was only about how the scars changes their self-perception, not about how it actually changes their chances of getting hired. Point being that if you are primed to think you will be discriminated against, you probably will think your being discriminated against.
@@TheRedfire555 nope it’s just the part of the experiment he described. All experiments have control groups. So there has to be at least two other groups. One group who knows they have no scares and another who knows they have scares. Also was this experiment just in women or is he omitting the male arm. He doesn’t even give the name of the study or anything.
@@TheRedfire555 I totally get that, I just feel that they could have done more to point out that some discrimination is real, and we shouldn't go around thinking all discrimination is in our heads because sometimes it is real and if we think its just in the persons head we essentially ignore the victim, which I think is how a lot of people end up committing suicide, they feel unseen
@@darrengillespie1258 missing the point
Positive thinking + positive attitude = positive results.
Negative thinking + negative attitude =
negative results.
I have real scares on my face. Never been discriminated against. It does not bother me at all. Its actually a great conversation starter.
How scary are they?
Hi, Seal. Love your work.
I think like many things how you carry yourself often matters more than how you look.
I hired a lot of people. I don't care about scars, unless they would be the result of auto mutilation or self scarification as that might suggest a mental issue
@LambentLark you want to go clubbing,?
If you tell people they are in a study to examine discrimination based on facial deformities and show them the scars, of course they're actively looking for those things, and reporting them back, because that's what they expect to happen. That's why in most psychology experiments, you leave the subjects clueless about what they're trying to find out. Otherwise they're gonna be already influenced and won't behave like normal.
@@Mewmew-lv5iv insecurity and oppression are two different things. You literally only feel oppressed if you actually are oppressed. Feeling made fun of or insecure is not the same thing as feeling discriminated against and this study has absolutely nothing to do with oppression or perceived oppression
Except that the study he mentioned did none of that. The study he referring to is called "gender and responses to disfigurement in self and others" and it didn't even have those women go look for a job. The purpose of the study was to see if facial discrimination differs in gender, and how the participants react to their own disfigurement and how it impacts their relationship...
Dude just bs an entire study :)))
@@hhbddjstar I thought it sounded weird when he specified that women were the ones being tested on, because if you're looking for information about feelings of victimhood, it would be helpful to look at everyone. I feel like he's using the fact that they used a group of women in the study to subtly imply that feeling like a victim is a "female trait" along with saying that doing such is inherently bad. Kinda yucky all round
@@butchcoolidge2533 You're missing the fact perception isn't as black and white as you wish it was. Feeling oppressed and being oppressed aren't necessarily correlated. Idk, where you came up with the idea that you only feel that way through the action. You can translate an action of being made fun of into discrimination which would then be oppression. Perception is key
@@hhbddjstar Dude, the women in the study specifically mentioned people staring at their scars.
Obviously their perception of how people were treating them had been very much influenced by their expectations.
Now do one that shows how managers can look for bad behavior thats not there.
Is that study based on my dad? :P
@@parthon its based on everyone's family, specially if you're Asian
It's the same study... You can call it victimhood if you want.. but it's not really about that.
It's about confirmation bias which has already been said elsewhere. If the manager gets in his head that a worker is trouble, he'll confirm that suspicion even when it isn't true.
@@AtotehZ it’s actually about the concept of “priming” in behavioural economics. Subtly different
I worked with a guy once who said his mother did hiring for higher level managers for a corporation. One thing he told me she would do is take them to lunch on the interview and if the interviewee salted or peppered their food before they tasted it she was unlikely to hire them because she thought that was an indication of them being a premature problem solver. I told him his mother seems to be the one with that problem.
This is so true! To many times I've been asked Are you depressed, do you suffer Anxiety; I tell these folks You must be talking about yourself! From the looks of things; they did not expect my answer to turn it back to where it comes from .them!
Yes, pre-conditioning can be powerful.
Yes and so can lying like this man has done. The study he's referencing isn't like what he said and their conclusions were not the same as his, because they are scientists are educated in their field and understand how scientific studies work... and Konstantin Kisin is a writer with no formal post-secondary education.
But you are lucky today, as you can go look for this study. It takes three search terms. You can find this study and see for yourself how this man has deceived people in this video. And then ask yourself why he'd do such a thing.
It's why you agree with this
Cuntstantine is a liar. that's not how the experiment was set up and its not what it found.
look up "Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction"
It also works the other way. People coming into a country, unwilling to assimilate, feel empowered by playing the race card.
Exactly why you don't let people what they are being tested on in a social experiment like this.
I'm wonder their reactions after they were informed that they had no scars on their faces.
Probably blamed the patriarchy.
Double down
Probably whinged on about how that’s gaslighting or something
I love how guys immediately get biased because he's talking about women (without actually citing that "study" btw) and not recognize the whining men everywhere in the interwebs leave about feminism, about how women are too proud and whatever. Because that's what a lot of MRAs and PUAs do, talk men into some victim role 😂😂
@@blatterrascheln2267 nerd.
I worked in the job centre and everyone would go on about they aren't given a chance because... their age, lack of experience, career break for children, disability etc. They all convinced themselves that they were not going to be successful. Mindset is the single most important thing for our success
Yes but people are judged on looks colour race religion language.
Understand him but their is something wrong in his opinion also what would something said to think this unless knowing what was said cannot believe it
The fact is they are using it as excuses for things they don't want to do ...if people can play on things to benefit them .. that's exactly what they will do . More and more of these lazy people are multiplying as the years go on.
Yes but it is very hard when you are told to apply for x amount of jobs a week. And get just any job. I hated applying for jobs. The constant rejection. You find a job im an area where you would be able to excel. And you get turned down.
I was trying to find a garage for my college placement. Ended up getting a place at the biggest garage in the district.
@@warrenholmar1129 you spelled it out. "College". People these days just hear "indoctrination camps for adult toddlers".
@@cincin4515 I should point out that it wasn't that sort of college. It was a technical college for trade skills. We are also talking 23 years ago.
Back then woke meant to wake up.
Now I think it means you are asleep...
What a great experiment! I'll use this for my courses I give at work :-)
I think that's a fair argument to make and certainly warrants more research. It's just important to remember that so much research has definitively proven that discrimination exists in job applications and many other settings. You can't ignore all of those studies just because you hate "woke culture"
as some has already mentioned in the comments, he's pushing an agenda about "woke-ism". of course, people often misinterpret things based on their bias, just look at people with anxiety or depression. that doesn't mean that the feeling of being oppresed is barely valid as he implies
@@запрещнка Sure, but your feelings don't equal oppression. That's the point - it's all in your head
@@highinfovoter8909 dude, you made exactly the same logical mistake this man did. learn to think properly Ig
This experiment was also executed in the worst way possible. The experiment he talks about has no experts involved and doesn't control the results with a different group of people. You can easily influence peoples perception by using the wrong words and thats what they probably did for this experiment.
@@highinfovoter8909 sure it's all in our heads. Including the heads of those prospective employers.
Maybe yours is empty enough that these things pass you by?
If you get told something enough times, you'll eventually believe it
No. If you have the thing youre told will happen… happen… you obviously believe itz
exactly right! like the story about God and all that stuff. crazy enough, people believe that too !
@@thezu9250yeah, but those in the experiment weren't discriminated against because of their scares, but they believed so
@@justaguy3538 I’m not talking about a situation where you don’t actually have the thing. This comment is about peoples paranoia around their gender or race. You can’t stop being a black person or a woman. It’s not some thing in your head like fake scars. So you can’t say that you are seeing some thing because of a trait you don’t have like this experiment.
Its a two sided problem, in that people often are victimised in one way or another, but viewing yourself as a victim makes it easier to see victimisation around every corner. It's a tough subject without many good answers, though it does highlight the importance of attitude.
Exactly, Ru Paul, the black drag queen said this...."If you are trigger-happy and you’re looking for a reason to reinforce your own victimhood, your own perception of yourself as a victim, you’ll look for anything that will reinforce that.”
According to modern standards he is wildly and utterly oppressed... I'm pretty sure he has run into issues before, but he has an amazing attitude.
True. Essentially, it's a trauma-like response. You experience discrimination many times at one point in your life, you expect it to come that many times later on, unless you don't just stop experiencing discrimination, but someone actually affirms you and gives you proper self-confidence (as opposed to going too far and giving you an excessively heightened ego), in which case you're more able to tell which is actual discrimination and which is just badly worded or not discriminatory at all.
@@moondust2365 The scary thing this study showed is that it doesnt have to be the result of real discrimination or trauma though. Just living in a culture that lies to you about the discrimination you will face makes you more likely to invent discrimination.
Good Point!! When discrimination is preached to you, you have a tendency to believe it!
A person who has *suddenly* experienced something that alters their idea of who they are as a person, isn't going to act the same way as a person who was born a certain way, and has been navigating their whole life as such.
Even if the scars were real, the people would act differently, due to the newness of the change to who they are, than someone who had had scars for a lifetime.
This was a test on self-confidence, not discrimination. Simple resume studies have been done as well. People with ethnic sounding names received a lot fewer calls than people with white names, and with the same experience and qualifications.
Thank you 🎉
Why do you think white people can't also have ethnic-sounding names, like Sergei? Also...do you think someone with a name like Kleitus or Bubba (someone who sounds like a white redneck) would get as many calls as someone named Tom? I'm sure they wouldn't. People are naturally attracted to things they're familiar with. "Tom" is a more familiar-sounding name than "Sergei." Also, people are biased in favor of names that are easy to say and easy to spell: studies have shown that people are more likely to buy stock in companies that have simple, easy-to-pronounce names, like Apple. That's not racism...that's just the quirks of the human brain.
This is one of the biggest reasons racism is still alive. People are trained to look for it in everything from birth. Most often it isn't there but People will think it is
It's democrats only reason for being. They are useless but very dangerous
The demand for racism seems to far exceed the supply of same.
Morgan Freeman said it best, "Just stop talking about it".
I like the part where he gave a link to the actual experiment or literally any information to allow people to find it and read about the methodology themselves, and then explained what they did for the control groups and what they reported.
Such transparent reporting and not at all being used to push political beliefs to an audience who won't ask questions.
Like, people are treating this as established fact despite there not being any info provided that indicates the study is real(like what group carried it out, what they named the study, when it was done... literally anything that would help someone seek out the information) let alone that it was properly carried out(yeah, methodology is important as how the researchers carry out an experiment will impact the results. And, based on the lack of transparency and lack of a control group, this study seems tailor made to generate this result).
But it confirms what people already believe, so why question it.
I am hunting for a reference. Good point. Keeping my mind open though.
It’s not that women were lying is that they adopted the scar and became insecure themselves and acted alongside that insecurity. It’s common sense. Tell someone their breath stinks and watch how they will speak as few words as possible
Agreed. While there is confirmation bias involved, majority of the issue is insecurity.
They became insecure about a fake scar that would be gone after the experiment? No.
@@Vaga-Bard You don't get insecure about a scar that you know is not real. It's pure confirmation bias and bad judgement.
@@Dedded00000 Scars are imperfections. They naturally incite insecurities. It’s like getting a bad haircut. There’s nothing inherently bad about a bad haircut, but it induces insecurity.
Yeah but conservatives will use the study to claim how the only oppressed groups are straight cis white christian men.
This needs to be heard by every person on planet
He completely misrepresented the entire study. Look it up.
Yep, Jimmy's right - he's pretty much just making this up. No such study ever happened and (if you give it a moment's thought) you'd realise the experiment he describes would never work.
Yep...
@@TeethToothmanThey don't care. They just want to feel "on the right side".
@@vicsaturno7274 what a strange perception of how people you have never met want to "feel". Forget the experiment, the behaviour he is talking about is easily discerned just by witnessing how people act .
“When you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will.” - Pollyanna, 1965
Totally
When you are a nail everything is a hammer. Something like that anyway...
🙌
more like when you're looking soo hard into studies that you have to select some study from the 80s in order to make a random point across (and you also ignore the fact that same study involved men and women but you'll selective mention just one gender to make your point)
@@zineguri8515 You've clearly missed the point
Yes! This! I’ve been saying this to my students for the last few years!
This experiment needs to be replicated and made larger.
Do you accept polls extrapolating %ages for almost 350 million people’s beliefs based on 1000 responses that may be hand picked to create the desired numbers?
@@divergentsenior no. Which is why a larger study is needed.
@@ophello I don’t object to a bigger study and I detest polls, but I totally believe that someone unused to facial scaring would feel self conscious and project onto others an attitude not in evidence.
I see it every time I am in public and someone goes off on a stranger who accidentally bumps into them.
We live in a less civil world today where we ascribe intention here it may not be.
1000 is a perfectly reasonable number to do a study on that gives usable data for a population of a few hundred million. If you don’t understand statistics, you can be fooled into thinking bigger is better but the truth is 1000-3000 is ideal. If you get a sample that’s non-negligible compared to the size of the population, you actually fail to get a random sample and now the results are going to be biased to the majority. The difference in error between 100-1000 is small, and the improvement in error margin from 1-3000 is almost nothing. You can look this up if you don’t believe me
@@divergentsenior in the The Musketeers, D'Artagnan is challenged to a duel for bumping in to someone. Civility hasn't plummeted at all.
When you think you are a nail, everyone else becomes a hammer in your mind
Brilliant experiment!
Once you are worried about how other people perceive you it's like a trigger in your brain waiting to go off.
Power of Suggestion. Works everytime. Right?
How is this a good experiment? It sounds completely fake.
It doesn't just change how you interpret the behavior of people you interact with, it also changes how you act. which can't help but affect the entire interaction. You're not just seeing something that isn't there, sometimes you're creating it.
D*** I thought we understood this already
Aren't job interviews about how other people perceive you?
This has implications in so many different directions. Fascinating!
Thank god there are other smart people speaking up on the truth about this major issue
Funny you should mention "god".
Oh yes because in this messed up world we all know the real issues are people not accepting it
he's not. He's using a study from 1980. It says nothing about today. If anything it shows that women were massively discriminated against in 1980, regardless of the scars.
@Marius Malus Ding ding. It says nothing that he claims it does and sounds deeply, deeply flawed. Just another Right wing grifter or idiot preying on the layman's inability to think critically.
@@marius4iasi women were not massively discriminated against in the 1980s in the west you are the victim hes talking about
self perception definitely plays a role in perceived levels of discrimination
I think this study would have benefitted from having a group WITH the scars to measure the levels of actual discrimination too
Rubbish 🗑️!
The discrimination often comes from the people who are looking for it.
@@ryanrogers8211 Rubbish 🗑️.
The study measured the self perception since the interview was obviously controlled.
@@wowmazin4399 most discrimination these days is self perception. I work with troubled youth and a lot of them have been brainwashed by their parents and schools.
Exactly, you're usually gonna find something negative every time you look for it, even if it doesn't exist.
Except people are discriminated against and those people who generally face it are also more likely to recognise it. I've seen it myself. I never put much stock in women complaining about some men being creeps or stalking them, until I got older and entered relationships and saw it happen with my own eyes.
I think we need to be cognizant of discrimination also because it is a violation of our civil rights. Unless such people are held accountable by the legal process, they will have no reason to be careful about their discrimination.
Presentation is key to success in many realms of endeavour.
Yeah... But Holocaust is real, slavery is real, discrimination is real...
But injustice and oppression exist, so do we just ignore them?
@@axa3687 not nearly as frequently as before, at least not in the West. Before me. we're forced into extreme dangerous environments and women were denied education while Irish and African Americans had some of the most frequent history of being enslaved within 200 years ago. Now if someone were to even say the wrong thing to a minority group they are given death threats. We have moved past all this stuff and everyone needs to get over the last because that is the only way to move to the future. The past should be taught in school but if u tell kids that they are discriminated against and there are only 2 people the oppressed and the oppressors then u will have a repeat of history.
The best thing we can learn from this is when we judge someone, we must ask ourselves why? The immediate effect is that we will find out more about ourselves; the second effect is we become happier.
"If the only tool you have is a hammer, it is tempting to treat everything as if it were a nail." -Abraham Maslow
I very much LOVE this. I'll be writing that down somewhere for future reference!
I believe the quote is "If all you have is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail", but yes.
@@Sanquinity I did a quick googling and yes, your version got more hits. Tho I can't deny that OP's version sounds a bit more fitting for some situations (and I like the fanciness of it too).
Thank you for teaching me something new~.
"it's easier to be a victim than a victor"
It's easier to believe anything that aligns with your biased opinion than it is to verify if something is actually true. This study "they" did, isn't real.
@@L3adb3lly Actually, it is, I did the study. You're welcome.
No, it’s easier to be the victor, no question.
What if everyone was named Victor
I knew a Victor growing up, nice guy
“I'm not crazy about reality, but it's still the only place to get a decent meal.”
― Groucho Marx
😂
A decent meal? That's only something that everyone gets in a fantasy.
@@Cyborg_Lenin It depends on what you were feeding yourself with before you ate what you called the decent meal!
@@Its_Shaun_the_Sheep no it depends on you being able to afford a decent meal. Half of the world can't, and millions can't afford a meal at all.
@@Cyborg_Lenin I guess you don’t know Groucho Marx
Excellent points.
I know this and I think my problem based on knowing this leads me to assuming people are not being mean to me when they actually are being mean. Its a confusing world.
i think that unless the people are taking advantage of you in some way, its always better to just assume theyre not being mean. If youre right, then those people are innocent and its fine. If youre wrong? You live in their head rent free while you go along happier in life than they ever will be.
Depends on the situation. You're gonna survive longer than the others
We all know a positive attitude is the best approach towards success. Thinking of yourself as a victim is not a positive attitude.
Problem is that most of the people pontificating about not being a victim are the first ones to clutch pearls when they don’t receive the preferential treatment they feel entitled to.
@@SoundBoss5150 There is a difference between someone feeling the World owes them something, and asking for assistance or something like professional courtesy (being in the same field). Those with negative attitudes don't expect much in life, most don't have positive role models, and their heroes (who they learn from ) are the older guys who seem cool.
So they justify stealing, then robbing, then looting and riots to take what must seem that every privileged person has. So they don't feel guilty.
What about a person that is actually a victim of abuse? Should we just pretend like it doesn't matter, and guilt them with toxic positivity when they open up about their struggles?
@@pineappleflow2876 Those who are victims of abuse are encouraged to try to heal... Doubt that sulking in the trauma will heal anything at all
@@pineappleflow2876 …Victims of abuse don’t need to “open up” during a job interview.
They may be more likely to negatively internalize things the employer said,
but their inner-dialogue (which is false) is irrelevant!
“Face discrimination”. That was the greatest pun I’ve ever heard and he didn’t even mean it.
Yes, I caught that too! Hehe.
Face discrimination, black discrimination😂😊😊😅
@@dnporter5506 ?
Wow! I’m going to use that pun 5 times today
He did smile a little though, maybe he caught it as he was saying it?
I went into a job interview with a severely swollen face after having surgery. I went in and told the interview team that if they didn't make fun of my face I would hold it against them. We had a good interview, they didn't make fun of my face. I got the offer before I made it home. What I did is remove the tension around my appearance. I let them know that my appearance wasn't going to affect me.
Thank you for making this about yourself
The example was that the people in the case had no scars but thought they had. You overcame yours and thats what the interviewers see.
Well done. More people need to see these videos, thank you.
The Christian persecution syndrome is a perfect example of this guy's claims.
@@religionkills4081so you're hanging onto your victimhood for all its worth, l see..
This is so important to keep in mind. It’s like passing a group of people and they suddenly start laughing so you think it must be about you. It’s so easy to project your own thoughts and insecurities onto someone else or a situation. Personally I always try and err on the side of being nothing to do with me, because even if it is about you, it usually isn’t. Meaning it’s not personal and they would say something to anyone because they aren’t happy people. Hurt people hurt people, and if you remember that it’s easier to have understanding for why they are like that. And if anything is blatant and I have time/energy, I always try to help them be less like that if I can because if you do it right you can really make a difference in the way they think and they’ll be nicer and happier.
I guess this is why when I pass people who are laughing or any similar situation I never think it’s about me because It has never entered my mind to do that to another person. Thank you. I never thought of that.
i almost got beat up by a guy who happened to walk by me and a friend, when my friend said something funny to me and i laughed. the guy, walking down the street without a shirt in the middle of the night, stopped, turned around and went crazy on me asking why i laughed at him. he started pushing me and was extremely aggressive. he must have been on some kind of drug, i dunno how else a person could be so insecure and aggressive :D
So true. Dividing people by giving names to their physical and/or mental state and then talking about inclusiveness is the stupidest thing to do. Just treat everyone with respect.
Wouldn't treating them with respect be calling them by the preferred name or pronoun they ask to be called by?
Yes i do agree with you but i also know hiwcfreeing it feels when you know youve been ill all yr life and soneone finally gives it a name, its fantastic to know it and be able to research it and improve my life and hopefully others around me.
Sadly people use diagnosis as a reason for why they behave badly and that has to end.
@@yonathansheldon2903no it's just complacency. Respect aint what those people need, it's better understanding of what theyre going through, but no one even bothers.
Treating people with respect doesn't happen, which is why there is a need for inclusiveness. Imagine if you're tired of hearing about it, imagine living it? You think people want to be mistreated? People are so comical.
@@larrytherustyboii7442Are respect and understanding mutually exclusive?
This was one of the first alarm bells in the process of my deciding to vote no in the referendum
"If everywhere you go it smells like sh•t, maybe it's time to check your own shoes."
I see this in groups a lot, can be religious, feminist, LGBTQ, BLM, etc. If you are always on a state of alert and jump at the smallest bit of discrimination, even if it's not actually that, then you make people upset and when those people start to recognise a patron, they will get upset at the group, which is anything but helpful.
It's not bad to defend yourself and talk some sense to a discriminator, but not everyone who makes a comment is actually one at heart, they can be confused or misunderstood something and the human is a prideful being so insulting them is just going to make it worse. I can't count the amount of times I have chatted with people who, even though they didn't end up agreeing with me, we were able to have a normal conversation, I explained why I supported something and they explained their concerns about the matter, no one insulted eachother, no one attacked and no one tried to make the other feel dumb.
Is it that hard to have a civil conversation and stop victimising yourself?
^ ^ this !! ^ ^ l too do this all the time.. it promotes unity as a people.. we be different, but we also are the same.. and connecting like that hopefully is passed along.. (ihisi)
when you're insecure, everything is perceived to be a threat
@Siegfried Sieger I know that feeling too, my friend. If a may offer some help, take care of yourself, find a productive skill you can master, and socialize when you can to build yourself up. It's not everything, but it's a start 👍
And what happens when you identify AS a threat?
now that's how politics works...
Absolutely! If you endlessly rant rave and preach anything it will become the truth even if it's a lie.
Like every narrative from the left.
Like anti China narrative
@@apersonfromtheinternet3444 no. Free 🇹🇼
@@notpc48 the right never does this. except for all the times it did
YES, YES, YES. I've been saying this for a long, long time, and I have absolutely zero psychological studies background.
Years ago i was the only asian in the office. I came into work one monday morning, a coworker gently asked for a quiet word, we went into an empty office, she then started telling me how she had been stressing all weekend, couldnt sleep, hadnt eaten, and felt sick, because of what she said to me on friday and thought that i must have been feeling the same all weekend (i hadnt). I was like "whatchu talkin bout willis", genuinely had no idea what she said and she didnt want to repeat it because it was so nasty. I laughed and told her i had no recollection and that we were good, she didnt believe me but i reassured her. Later on other coworkers asked if i was ok etc etc. I can see how some people are primed for victim hood. I just wanted to play video games.
You don't have a victim frame of mind thus you're not a victim! 👍👍
Saaame.
I'm an imported latino here in the states, a co-worker thought it'd be a great idea to go for some tacos and asked me which ones my favorite. Loved her face when I told her down in south america tacos aren't a thing. She immediately assumed I got severely offended or something and another co-worker was also so worried about it because she was the one to come up with the idea of going out to eat Latinx good food with me (she actually said latin-ex) and I had to correct her, real latinos hate being called latin-ex and we find that racist and offensive, but thinking every latino loves tacos is just absolutely normal because we just assume muricans are extremely ignorant about anything outside the planet earth, i.e. USA.
@@rRekko Its more based on the fact that people in the United States have very little interaction with people actually from south america, and their cultures aren't in a ton of media.
Id assume you know next to nothing about the cultures of people in say the baltic regions or east africa, but you likely have good/decent knowledge about the United kingdom, Russia, China, India. Even though you lived nowhere close to them.
Most people around the world are too busy living their lives to learn about people thousands of miles away, who aren't a major impact on their day to day lives, this is not exclusively a murican thing.
They can heck off with that latin-ex though.
How can you be a victim if you don’t even know what happened? You don’t know what she said and she wouldn’t repeat it. How is this story relevant to being a victim?
@@rRekkowtf is "imported" latino?
Of course, this doesn't measure whether someone with scars WOULD actually be treated differently. Having interviewed people for positions, I'd say it is very difficult to remove personal grooming and appearance from your assessment and concentrate on their qualifications.
The experiment wasn't to check whether or not someone with obvious scars is discriminated against, it was to show that if you feel like a victim or if you are constantly told you are a victim you will take everything adverse as an attack.
@@PixelSageYTwell yeah, they had a "victim mentality" because the experiment asked them to look for discrimination, and it's very hard to do this kind of experiment without giving away the fact it's about discrimination, and there was apparently no accounting for changes in behaviour from the participants, it's basically not a good study lol
@@cd8048 The point is that they primed people to look for discrimination. So everything that happened regardless of actual discrimination they attributed to them being the victim and discriminated against. Its a parallel to today's society where people are constantly being told they are victims and always feeling attacked or slighted. It isn't an exact science or a study, but more of a social experiment.
@@PixelSageYT yes the idea is simple but I'm saying the guy is an idiot lol 😂 obviously coopting the social science phenomenon of priming into a political message
@PixelSage no, they were told to look for discrimination specifically so they looked for it I don't think any of the people with scars were acting like victims they were just doing what they were told
One of these day's I'll figure out who "they" are and convince them to peer review their "findings"
I LOVE these types of experiments. I wish we would all sit back and reflect on what these results tell us. Now, I've got to find this experiment to confirm what was said here.
describes the whole victimhood narrative to a T. well done sir
Except when people ARE being victimized !
Funny how you excluded that one..
Are you a psychopath ?
there we have the next fool who thinks 'he know the truth' about something that is not a statement, my god you must be american....
Lol and I bet if you show them this they would call you racist for doing so. 🙈
So white victimhood is a real thing then. Good point.
@@grantquinones ¿ juice ?
As a scared up man I can honestly say the average person is uncomfortable around someone with visible scars or disabilities it's on the "scared" to deal with it, it's just human nature
I guess it depends on your environment . I dated a man for around 7 years who was burned over 90 percent of his body, including his face.He also had lost half an arm and his other arm and hand were burned badly as well. He said he was never discriminated against for it ,that he was aware of anyway, and rarely did he notice any people who were outwardly uncomfortable around him. Maybe people were uncomfortable but they didn't show it. Many people may have opinions based on what they have experienced and it seems like one thing is normal to some and not to others. There can be a lot of anecdotal evidence for situations.
I have 6 skin grafts on my face alone from skin cancer excisions; first ones in 2008 and latest ones in January this year with more to follow. Being naturally fair skinned, the donor sites have always been areas that have not seen much sun at all -for I have an appendectomy scar where I never had my appendix removed lol - so there is a significant colour match for most of them.
I can say in all honesty that strangers are uncomfortable around me and agree completely that that is exactly how society has programmed us.
BUT.... it has never affected me at any job interview. Maybe because I am a guy?
The people you deal with are probably scared to say something about your scars or look like they are fixating on them. Not because they are scared of you. They don't want you to feel offended.
Humans, sadly are just naturally frightened by other humans who look radically different from most, especially from injury. On some primitive level we fear going through the same thing. But 100% agree that we should be empathetic and see past that with our conscious mind instead of our innate fears.
*scarred, not scared. 🙏🏽😇💜☝🏽🫡
This is the only reference I’ve seen to this study from a reputable source (the NYT): “Dr. Robert Cleck, a psychologist at Dartmouth College, has devised an experiment that illustrates how body image affects how people think. Using theatrical makeup, researchers fashioned a scar on female subjects before their interaction with a stranger hired for the experiment. Unbeknown to the women, the scar was removed before the face-to-face conversation with the stranger. Nevertheless, the women said the stranger had stared at the scar and made them uncomfortable.”
They reported discomfort, not discrimination.
So what you're saying is that this guy was primed by his preexisting belief that "wokeism" is a problem, to read more into this study than was really there?
WHERE IS THE LINK TO THE STUDY?
Your perception creates your reality. I always remind myself of that and my experiences as a Black person have been very unique. I refuse to feel oppressed and restricted. I refuse that reality. ✌🏾♥️
Yup, people need to get past themselves and have internal confidence. What we have in the world today is a lack of knowing everyone is a beautiful child of God and we have every right to be confident knowing so. Love one another, help one another and love yourself.
Easily said.
Problem with all "We need to have theses" just as the "We need to be tolerant" is that is will mostly reflect in those that want to be that way, people that have no moral compass, children, the unread, will continue to discriminate freely at their leisure.
Do Videogames increase violence? No, violent games appeal to people of that mentality, its an outlet of something thats already there.
Oh I LOVE this.
Absolutely correct. It primes people to look for what they have been told. They come to have a predisposition with preconceived notions.
Exactly! If you're looking to be offended, you will find things that offend you.
Preach! I actually have a recent facial scar from surgery, and I just go on being my usual self, but I was very surprised to find most people didn't even notice it!
Everybody notice dude, or it might really be unnoticable. But as someone who was burned on one half of my face, a lot of people ask me about it all the time, i just dont belive you😂
I got a laceration near my eye from a biking accident that needed 19 stitches. Just got them taken out today. Pretty mixed feelings about it. I hope it heals well. I know I just need to accept it but I wish it never happened.
@@benjaminmolnar3881 get some silicon gel or silicon patches. Make sure to massage the scar daily. This really helps make your scar fade. I've been doing it with mine and it's faded a bunch and no longer feels ropey after 2 months.
@XWierdThingsHappenX I got the Mederma advanced scar gel, I was told to use it after the wound closes. You think this is good? Would you recommend something else?
@@benjaminmolnar3881 I would recommend actual silicon gel. Which has been clinicly proven to help reduce scars. Mederma hasn't been as throughly tested. The number one recommend is silicon.
Should have recorded the interviews and shown the ladies their body langue and facial expressions and ask them questions about how they were feeling in that moment believing they had something wrong with them and how it changed the way they behaved in the interview.
I'm sure they would have, if this experiment ever took place. It did not. This is a complete invention he's making up to support his biases.
I mean... that's literally what they did. He said that in the video
They did record the "interviews" which weren't actually interviews. This study did not happen anything like what Kisin, the man in this video, is describing. He misrepresented both the method and the results. Maybe that's why he didn't say what the study was, or who conducted it.
The study is called, Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued characteristics on social interaction by Robert Kleck of Dartmouth College 1980
@@kim-urban-edwards2083 its a real study, limited, and grossly misrepresented in this video, but it did happen.
Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued characteristics on social interaction
@@kim-urban-edwards2083 exactly: For one, it's not an experiment because they didn't have a control group. Second, he makes a leap to his conclusion on objective data based on unrelated subjective data: We don't know if the discrimination exists because they didn't do that experiment, only that they felt discriminated based on their observations; but their observations were manipulated by being lied to about their appearance. Discrimination statistics have nothing to do with "feelings" they have to do with observable, objective data regarding hiring practices.
1000% TRUTH! Same with micro aggressions and unconscious bias. Not that these things don’t happen, but the degree to which people are victims of these things vs reality.
That’s not exactly how the Dartmouth scar experiment was conducted, and that is not the conclusion that came out of the study. Yes the participants did have different gaze patterns when they thought they had a scar. Or in other words, yes they felt more self conscious. But that study did not prove that discrimination doesn’t exist. Which is the unfortunate awful take from this whole “anti-woke” movement.
Yep, it's total BS, and a disingenuous take on the study. I don't care either way, but I hate this deliberate lie.
@@justadude1443 Thanks for speaking up about this is well. While this “there is no discrimination” propaganda movement is nothing new, I’ve been noticing it more and more on social media. Just hoping not a lot of people buy into the BS as the consequence is we start seeing further support for legislation that marginalizes groups of people. Another critique of this video is it primarily targets women where the study was actually near equal parts men and women, with slightly more men.
If you’re stumbling on this discussion, pay attention to videos like these, find the actual studies (not news articles as there are too many propaganda sites that zero in on obscure topics like these and amplify false narratives). Dispel the negative connotation of “wokeism” as it is simply a propaganda campaign to ensure valid complaints and concerns cannot be recognized.
Moreover, the study actually included both sexes with more male participants than female (27:21). Stating that a group of women perceived a discriminatory bias where there couldn't have been any is rather disingenuously suggesting that women are more prone to this phenomenon when in fact there may have been no difference between either group. He does himself no service when he uses a study to support his narrative but misinforms the audience about the said study.
And that's why we should ignore micro aggressions. They're imagined aggressions.
The old placebo effect, just applied in another discipline. Makes total sense.
Are we pretending that prejudices don't exist?
@@DonnyNoMarie No, we're saying the world is not black and white and we should be very very careful of how we view and measure it. Balance in all things.
No that's not placebo effect.
@@cs5384 It's related to it
A great experiment! The lack of confidence and preconceived ideas!