The Horrible History Of The East India Company

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
  • Exploitation, political meddling, and military aggression.
    I’m not talking about the dictator of a banana republic; I’m talking about a private company whose personal army was three times that of the British army. The East India Company sounds like the sort of capitalistic nightmare ripped straight from the pages of a Philipp K Dick novel, but these guys were a real dystopian force.
    Their time may be over, but their consequences of their actions shaped the world as we know it. In 1557, a few years before the unofficial Anglo-Spanish War, Francis Drake decided to explore the bank accounts of Spanish settlements in South America. [1] Once he plundered the Spanish colonies, he darted back across the Pacific Ocean, until touching down in the East Indies.
    As Drake sails away, the Spanish throw things at him in anger. While travelling through the Molucca Islands he met Sultan Babullah, then ruler of the Sultanate of Ternate - one of the oldest Muslim Kingdoms in Indonesia.
    This guy was the greatest of the Sultans having run out the Portuguese occupants. Under his rule, the Sultanate reached its golden peak thanks to his reign of free trade and access to valuable forest resources. [2]
    For Francis Drake, the maritime door-to-door salesman, this was the perfect client. After all, both him and the Sultan shared a common enemy with the Portuguese, who were in cahoots with the Spanish.
    Drake offered his linens, gold and silver. But let’s call it what it really was, ‘Evil Thing Number 1
    So it’s time to understand how history works as tally up the evil crimes of the East India Company.
    ------
    #HowHistoryWorks #History #colonialhistory
    Link To My Other Channel: / howmoneyworks
    Written By: Sam
    Video Edited By:
    Svibe Multimedia Studio
    Editor: Cardan
    Media Gatherer: Andrea Rivas
    Footage Courtesy of: Getty Images
    Music Provided By: Epidemic Sound
    For sponsorship inquiries, please contact sponsors@worksmedia.group
    -----
    Sources:
    1. www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK...
    2.www.researchgate.net/publicat...
    AN_BABULLAH_IN_EXPELLING_PORTUGUESE_FROM_NORTH_MALUKU
    3. www.rmg.co.uk/stories/topics/...
    4. www.britannica.com/money/topi...
    5. www.history.com/topics/religi...
    6. www.rmg.co.uk/collections/obj...
    7. www.jstor.org/stable/2862560
    8. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/...
    9. www.britannica.com/biography/...
    10. www.geeksforgeeks.org/anglo-d...
    11. www.history.com/topics/europe...
    12. www.nam.ac.uk/explore/battle-...
    13. blogs.bl.uk/untoldlives/2012/...
    nicholas-skottowe.html
    14. bitterwinter.org/great-bengal...
    15. www.britannica.com/topic/Regu...
    16. www.lhistoire.fr/english-vers...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 211

  • @georgeofhamilton
    @georgeofhamilton 4 місяці тому +101

    Dang, so the EITC from _Pirates of the Caribbean_ is pretty on-brand.

    • @paradigmshift3879
      @paradigmshift3879 2 місяці тому

      East India Company = 169 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.
      World take over = 169 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.
      Wealth transfer = 170 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.
      Tailor made money = 170 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.

    • @John-PaulHunt-pv6ol
      @John-PaulHunt-pv6ol Місяць тому

      How the USA won its freedom from a company only to then become a company! How ironic!

  • @roymagnana2918
    @roymagnana2918 4 місяці тому +57

    At its peak in the 17th century, the Dutch East India Company (Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie/VOC) had a broader global reach and economic clout than the British East India Company. The Dutch East India Company was truly global in scope (East and West), unlike the British East India Company, whose trade was limited mainly to the Indian subcontinent. This makes the Dutch company (and not the British one) the first true multinational company (in addition to being the first joint-stock company in the world). The Dutch East India Company was also the wealthiest commercial enterprise globally, generating enormous profits from the spice trade. It went bankrupt in the late 18th century and was formally dissolved in 1799, opening the doors to the British East India Company (dissolved in 1874).
    The British East India Company grew steadily and eventually surpassed the Dutch in economic power by the late 18th century. However, considering their historical impact, the British East India Company arguably had a more significant and enduring influence on global trade and politics.

    • @Terra_Lopez
      @Terra_Lopez 4 місяці тому +5

      Wow, that's really informative and helpful -- thank you!

    • @lammm077
      @lammm077 3 місяці тому +1

      that because of Diponegoro and Javanese War that screwed out VOC cashflows

    • @DenUitvreter
      @DenUitvreter 25 днів тому +1

      Not true, the VOC had the Dutch monopoly from the Cape eastwards, the WIC had the Dutch monopoly on the Atlantic. It did an expedition to find the North passage to the East-Indies for which they hired Henry Hudson. European trade wast still much, much bigger and that was dominated by the Dutch merchant fleet consisting of thousands of companies that had nothing to do with the VOC.

    • @roymagnana2918
      @roymagnana2918 25 днів тому

      @@DenUitvreter I am not sure what it is you disagree with.

  • @Leonfei
    @Leonfei 4 місяці тому +23

    Watching this video at 4AM while playing FFXIV was certainly a trip. Especially when nodding off while crafting and hearing the "Moogle Empire" mentioned...

  • @Axel...
    @Axel... 4 місяці тому +72

    Hey, I've noticed you are experimenting with ai images on both channels. To me, they look a bit off every time I see them. They make your videos look less personal imo. I much prefer a quickly photoshopped image over a generated one. Take this feedback as you will. It's your channel, so obviously you can run it however you want. :)
    Other than that, keep up the amazing work. You are one of my favorite youtubers!

    • @SuperSuchties
      @SuperSuchties 4 місяці тому +8

      "a quickly photoshopped image" - did you ever create a video like this? nothing is quick

    • @pflh2391
      @pflh2391 4 місяці тому +8

      ​@@SuperSuchtiesI have done it professionally. it's not as quick as AI, but it's not that long either.
      It's as quick as you want it to be.

    • @SuperSuchties
      @SuperSuchties 4 місяці тому

      fair point @@pflh2391

    • @AwesomeHairo
      @AwesomeHairo 4 місяці тому +1

      Your uses of commas were great until this one: "It's your channel, obviously you can run it however you want."
      You made a comma splice, and could easily fix it by putting "so" (a conjunction) after that comma.

    • @Axel...
      @Axel... 4 місяці тому +2

      @@AwesomeHairo I didn't expect grammar feedback on my comment. Haha thanks :) I did edit the comment.

  • @CarthagoMike
    @CarthagoMike 4 місяці тому +41

    So basically they copied the Dutch East India template but with more crimes against humanity.

    • @danielkaner5156
      @danielkaner5156 4 місяці тому +3

      Well not really, because meanwhile the Dutch East India was the protector of the Spice Islands and more, the British East India Company was the de facto ruler of India. The Dutch East India had way less authority over thier sphere of influenze.

    • @mudra5114
      @mudra5114 2 місяці тому

      Crime against humanity?? 😂 Like what?

    • @riel5197
      @riel5197 4 години тому

      "more" crimes against humanity? i think you need to revisit the Dutch East India side of story once more.

  • @Kushagra.j
    @Kushagra.j 4 місяці тому +208

    If you ever feel stupid always remember that there are still some people who think the East India Company wasn't Evil 😂

    • @Sonny_McMacsson
      @Sonny_McMacsson 4 місяці тому +7

      God save the queen!

    • @CorinnaAtHome
      @CorinnaAtHome 4 місяці тому +18

      There's also people who think it was run by India.

    • @sumeettanwar1608
      @sumeettanwar1608 4 місяці тому

      Don't forget the idiots who think name of India came from British.

    • @mralpaca2150
      @mralpaca2150 4 місяці тому +6

      People do not realize It is always relative. You will feel 10x more stupid when you fall for propaganda and choose the greater of the two evils. I would take the East India Company to rule my country any day of the week.

    • @blackerpanther3329
      @blackerpanther3329 4 місяці тому +8

      Wasn’t evil, just pragmatic

  • @Dark0crY
    @Dark0crY 4 місяці тому +6

    That Trujillo photo and description made my day!

  • @harp_recon
    @harp_recon 4 місяці тому +48

    People think we don't act like this anymore, I mean, where do we get our iPhones, chocolate, coffee, bananas, or anything cheap. Then we have the over pricing of these cheaply produced products, guys, I love money.

    • @batman1776
      @batman1776 4 місяці тому +8

      Yes, but oftentimes without these jobs the locals would be even worse off.

    • @Kushagra.j
      @Kushagra.j 4 місяці тому

      No way bro is comparing this with East India Company. When was the last time Apple caused a famine which led to the death of millions? Or Tesla conquered a subcontinent and then plundered it? Or when Proctor & Gamble forced people to grow Opium and fought wars for Exporting it?

    • @harp_recon
      @harp_recon 4 місяці тому

      Yeah, you got a point. Successful super powers started as low level producers, like early United States, China, post war Germany.
      I guess you got to dig in the mud before you can sleep in jewels.

    • @cjthebeesknees
      @cjthebeesknees 4 місяці тому +4

      @@batman1776False, tell that to the Africans dying digging for lithium and other precious metals in Africa.

    • @HarryMonn
      @HarryMonn 4 місяці тому +3

      ​@cjclark1208 China industrialized by the West exploiting it for cheap labor. Mining has high mortality but the really cheap manufacturing jobs are better than subsistence farming.

  • @A_Blip_In_The_Universe
    @A_Blip_In_The_Universe 4 місяці тому +12

    The EITC makes modern corporations look like rank amateurs. And that is not a bad thing.

    • @Vroomfondle1066
      @Vroomfondle1066 4 місяці тому +3

      Don't worry, they're getting there....

    • @mikitz
      @mikitz 4 місяці тому +2

      The EITC?
      The VOC wants to have a word...

  • @anthonyzheng7274
    @anthonyzheng7274 4 місяці тому +11

    tldr; EIC was the cyberpunk corpo minus the cyberpunk

  • @KamikazeMedias
    @KamikazeMedias 4 місяці тому +12

    How about a how money works episode about naval insurance buisness and how it works~? And how similar companies like Dutch East Indies work today?

  • @s80key
    @s80key Місяць тому +2

    Britain has no empire left but the practices of the east India company still carry on with the British state being gutted and left just a Carcass now.

  • @KsenijaCelner
    @KsenijaCelner 4 місяці тому +5

    The West Indian Company was equally bad but the modern Dutch still view it as their Golden Age. No joke.

    • @rosegocheva3309
      @rosegocheva3309 3 місяці тому +2

      How many Dutch people have told you that? 😂😂😂

    • @DenUitvreter
      @DenUitvreter 25 днів тому

      No, it wasn't. It was differently bad. The Dutch Republic already had had the first half of their Golden Age before profits from WIC or VOC came in, both started for war reasons, to protect what you take for granted now. Since you are enjoying freedom of religion, freedom of speech and print, upward social mobility and modern capitalism, citizenship in a nation state, free trade, the Dutch Golden Age was golden for you too.

  • @SteveSmith-qf7xj
    @SteveSmith-qf7xj 4 місяці тому +5

    "The first multi-international" - wouldn't that be the Dutch East India company that the British one was based upon?

  • @user-ef8rt7ru5c
    @user-ef8rt7ru5c 4 місяці тому +33

    Just think that the prevalent narrative still remains that the UK got rich and powerful because of parliamentary institutions and free trade

    • @kacgb5315
      @kacgb5315 4 місяці тому +3

      ....welll those are contributing factors lmao, thats the norm round history of comquerng and exploiting land we over here acting like this is new

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 4 місяці тому +2

      I wouldn't call military enforced monopolies free trade, quite.

    • @blackerpanther3329
      @blackerpanther3329 4 місяці тому +1

      I wouldn’t call it exploitation

    • @danielkaner5156
      @danielkaner5156 4 місяці тому +6

      You know that Britain was only able to conquer the world because of it's parliamentary institutions and free trade. Most colonies were even a losing game for Britain and France and they only kept them for prestige and so that they had a market there and could sell goods to. To say that Britain got rich because of India is wrong, Britain got rich because of it's early industrialisation which happened because of it's parliamentary institutions and free trade. Your argument is not logical and you are confusing the chain of causality.

    • @user-ef8rt7ru5c
      @user-ef8rt7ru5c 4 місяці тому

      The european colonialist nations got their empires because they developed weapons far more advanced than their victimcs after endless wars with one another. (Also, especially in the case of the Americas, the devastating diseases they brought with them was a crucial factor). Britain did not industrialise until after the American revolution, as a direct result of their defeat in that war- they needed to build newer, better warships to make up for their losses. The fact that other nations from the same part of the world, with a similar history in warfare, but no meaningful parliaments also had vast colonial empires moere or less disproves that bit of Whig nonsense, not to mention that suffrage was so limited, the parliament was more or less a joke. As for free trade, seriously WTF! What free trade are you talking about? We are referring to colonial empires! Anyway... have a nice day@@danielkaner5156

  • @user-yg3xd5th1p
    @user-yg3xd5th1p 4 місяці тому +5

    Fun fact: Indian spice trader virji vora was the largest creditor of east India company. They play victims and point fingers but were very complacent in profit sharing

  • @anthonyruby2668
    @anthonyruby2668 3 місяці тому +2

    EIC should stand for The Expansionist-Industrial Complex

  • @joem58158
    @joem58158 4 місяці тому

    These emails are html that load when you open them. Similar to html in the browser, three html can render differently depending on viewport (i.e. desktop, mobile, tablet, etc). Usually, you load them differently to fit more or less the same content to look ok in different screen sizes, but you can load whatever you want for each viewport. You could make them completely different if you wanted. So, different text is perfectly possible. I'd guess they didn't intend the difference and someone just fucked up.

  • @MofongoJones
    @MofongoJones 4 місяці тому +3

    The shock I had many years ago when I learned it was a real thing. I thought it was a made up company on Pirates of the Caribbean

  • @nikunjmundhra3119
    @nikunjmundhra3119 4 місяці тому +8

    Its estimated that the UK caused about $45,000,000,000,000 worth of damages to India, and many believe that India had a solid chance of joining the industrial revolution, and be a developed country today if it were not for the brits

    • @blob22201
      @blob22201 4 місяці тому +2

      Don't be silly.

    • @STARK50
      @STARK50 4 місяці тому +3

      ​@@blob22201like you?

    • @blob22201
      @blob22201 4 місяці тому +4

      @@STARK50 nah, I'm not throwing around silly, debunked numbers.

    • @user-yg3xd5th1p
      @user-yg3xd5th1p 4 місяці тому

      That's a lie by a Marxist communist. Look into the article, it compounds the expenses to run india for 200 yrs. By that logic if I were to steal a loaf of bread 1000 yrs ago that'd today be estimated more than what indian gdp is, misuse of compounding

    • @mudra5114
      @mudra5114 2 місяці тому +1

      45 trillion is a cooked up number by a Marxist theorist with very questionable calculations. It was impossible to take 45 trillion from India as it is far more than the cumulative GDP of India during that period. 😂😂

  • @redfoxtress
    @redfoxtress 3 місяці тому

    I'm not sure if it was on purpose, but the opening line of "I'm not talking about a banana Republic" is pretty ironic considering the actual history of banana Republics. Which is deeply intertwined with private companies and western imperialism

  • @dylansmith6078
    @dylansmith6078 4 місяці тому +2

    Im mostly an auditory watcher so Little pause on "McDonald's having a shoot out with burger king wendys and Hawaii" threw me off wtf hawaii do? 😂

  • @joaoandre1594
    @joaoandre1594 3 місяці тому +1

    EIC now is Black rock and the money didn’t change hands.

  • @hemidas
    @hemidas 4 місяці тому +1

    The ancestor of all Cyberpunk Megacorporations.

  • @orangemanbad
    @orangemanbad 3 місяці тому +1

    These men would not believe their own homeland became occupied with these foreigners.

  • @DenUitvreter
    @DenUitvreter 25 днів тому +1

    Nothing ironic. The States-General already existed before the the Dutch Republic's DOI and the States as provincial parliaments without having a common assembly go back to the 13th century. The English support for the Dutch revolt was half arsed and two faced, and queen Elizabeth kicking the Dutch sea beggars out of English ports and taking back her beloved non valeur Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester where both great turning points in the Dutch war against the Spanish Empire. Lucily for the English, the Dutch had already blocked the Spanish Armada from actually invading England.

  • @MultiVigarista
    @MultiVigarista 4 місяці тому +3

    The image in the background at 9:12 is the parliament of my country, I was so surprised by that!

    • @AwesomeHairo
      @AwesomeHairo 4 місяці тому +1

      This is a misuse of a comma.

  • @Robalogot
    @Robalogot 4 місяці тому +1

    Why keep people confusing the Dutch East India company with the British. The Dutch was first and far larger

  • @sourabhmayekar3354
    @sourabhmayekar3354 4 місяці тому

    Nice

  • @TriumvirSajaki
    @TriumvirSajaki 4 місяці тому +4

    So, my company is not the most evil and powerful corporation in the world?....

    • @Kushagra.j
      @Kushagra.j 4 місяці тому

      We should start a West Britian Company which will colonise the UK!

    • @mikitz
      @mikitz 4 місяці тому

      @@Kushagra.jIt could prove out to be surprisingly hard, given that even the name is misspelled.

  • @ozemg32_ozem_goldwire
    @ozemg32_ozem_goldwire 4 місяці тому

    Just a reminder: James Lancaster was born in Basingstoke in England, NOT Portugal.

  • @ANONYMOUS-DEK012
    @ANONYMOUS-DEK012 4 місяці тому

    Damn I didn't no that

  • @robvoncken2565
    @robvoncken2565 2 місяці тому +2

    LOL EIC was a joke the Dutch VOC was the largest company in the world EVER ...... PERIOD.

  • @paradigmshift3879
    @paradigmshift3879 2 місяці тому +1

    East India Company = 169 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.
    World take over = 169 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.
    Wealth transfer = 170 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.
    Tailor made money = 170 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 54 = 9.

  • @oscarpena7285
    @oscarpena7285 3 місяці тому +1

    Once again, Spain didn’t have colonies, they were viceroyalties, never compare what the Spanish did and what the British did.

    • @sovkhan4359
      @sovkhan4359 3 місяці тому

      Yes. Spanish rule was far more strict than British colonies. I mean, why did every single Spanish viceroyalties revolt against their overlords?

  • @danielsandoval6421
    @danielsandoval6421 3 місяці тому +1

    Lord Beckett did all this?

  • @mugiwaragang
    @mugiwaragang 3 місяці тому

    Were they masons?since they came theres a lodge built in malaya,now you can find a lodge in every state in malaysia..these lodge only exist after english set foot.. especially the east indies company

  • @Old_Jack_Ketch
    @Old_Jack_Ketch 4 місяці тому

    If anything the video is understated, but that’s okay: a video going through the EICs dirty laundry in detail would easily go for several hours.

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 4 місяці тому

    Not just not nice but hellish 🤣

  • @yurydmorales
    @yurydmorales 4 місяці тому +1

    Banana republic here. It is Dominican republic and the dictator shown it's Trujillo, one of the worst from the Caribbean. Great content as usual, kind regards 🇩🇴

    • @AwesomeHairo
      @AwesomeHairo 4 місяці тому +2

      This is a misuse of a comma.

    • @pupysb6267
      @pupysb6267 3 місяці тому +1

      Trujillo, worst dictator in the Caribbean? Ever heard of Papa Doc Duvalier? Fidel Castro? Trujillo might not have been a good lad, but far from the worst in the region

    • @yurydmorales
      @yurydmorales 3 місяці тому

      @@pupysb6267 Indeed, "worst" could be subjective. Edited to a one of the worst, biased because we suffered him here. Blessings! 🇩🇴✨

  • @jamiedale6301
    @jamiedale6301 Місяць тому +1

    Why do you have to end EVERY SENTENCE in the same tone? Are you a robot? If yes, fair enough

  • @ebecerra85
    @ebecerra85 4 місяці тому +1

    The original Cartel

  • @jonathankerr4859
    @jonathankerr4859 3 місяці тому +1

    There were two East India company’s. The Dutch one was the wealthiest company that has ever existed. Considering how rich n powerful, and despicable n immoral, they were that’s saying something.

    • @DenUitvreter
      @DenUitvreter 25 днів тому

      It was still peanuts. No year in history had the VOC making more money for the Dutch Republic than the good old herring fishery. The Dutch merchant fleet in Europe was a 100 times bigger than that of the whole VOC.

    • @jonathankerr4859
      @jonathankerr4859 24 дні тому +1

      @@DenUitvreter the Dutch East India Company (VOC) was the wealthiest multinational to have ever excised.

    • @DenUitvreter
      @DenUitvreter 24 дні тому

      @@jonathankerr4859 Another YT myth, all based on a dodgy calculation by a Canadian media company. We know it was bigger than the British East India Company, we also know that peak VOC brought in less money to the Dutch Republic than the good old herring fishery. We also know it's less than 200 merchant ships was futile compared to the enormous Dutch merchant fleet in Europe.

    • @jonathankerr4859
      @jonathankerr4859 22 дні тому

      @@DenUitvreter didn’t know about the herring income. But why would it matter that the merchant fleet was larger? There both Dutch. I assume by what you say that the VOC operated globally outside of Europe and the merchant fleet in Europe. The VOC and Dutch merchant fleet would be rivals. Also just because one is larger than the other doesn’t mean that they are a more profitable organisation.
      But like I said, I didn’t know about the herring fishery. 👍

    • @DenUitvreter
      @DenUitvreter 22 дні тому

      @@jonathankerr4859 I'm just putting it in perspective. Besides the dodgy calculations by a questionable source that is taken for a fact all over history videos on YT, the special thing about it was that it was all put in one company with a Dutch monopoly.
      If we decide now that all Dutch trade with Ireland would be done by a single company, that would be a huge company too. The VOC didn't compete with the tens of thousands of individual merchants because it had a monopoly East of the Cape in today's SA, and it was not competitive in the European trade because of operation costs. Bigger ships with lots of guns and bigger crew, double planked, they were specialized in one year journeys with valuable cargo, not suited for shipping wheat from Poland to Sweden at competitive prices.

  • @syedmaricar9946
    @syedmaricar9946 3 місяці тому

    Every one oppressed only economic profits mattered .

  • @freneticness6927
    @freneticness6927 3 місяці тому

    Almost as bad a company as google is.

  • @funmath3835
    @funmath3835 4 місяці тому

    britain always put restrictions after its too late 😢

    • @robspencer5810
      @robspencer5810 3 місяці тому

      After they had profited enough, more like it.

  • @pedroaugusto656
    @pedroaugusto656 4 місяці тому

    Honestly, why the East India Company didn't took over the British government. If they had a bigger army and a equal naval power that would be pretty easy

    • @sumeettanwar1608
      @sumeettanwar1608 4 місяці тому +1

      Same reason apple Google don't do it. It's the British name which game them the power otherwise it would have been open season on them by combine European power not just British also most of their wealth was in British banks.

    • @mikitz
      @mikitz 4 місяці тому +1

      Even if they had a bigger military, there would've been tons of casualties and loss revenue for practically nothing to win whatsoever.

  • @3DHDcat
    @3DHDcat 4 місяці тому

    60k vs 1Bn...who wins?

    • @giantmastersword
      @giantmastersword 4 місяці тому +1

      Whoever pays more

    • @3DHDcat
      @3DHDcat 4 місяці тому +2

      @@giantmastersword 60k brits

    • @STARK50
      @STARK50 4 місяці тому

      India didn't have 1 billion people in 17th century. Also Europeans didn't arrived as invaders, they arrived as traders. When they gain trust of kings and common people, they backstabbed!

  • @spiritualsayan4330
    @spiritualsayan4330 3 місяці тому

    13:07 Nah there are people who like them

  • @sarahfranco6802
    @sarahfranco6802 4 місяці тому

    1:00

  • @Vroomfondle1066
    @Vroomfondle1066 4 місяці тому +2

    You should do America next...

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 4 місяці тому

      America is still a dominant empire, you can't get accurate information on our business around the world or even domestic history often times.

  • @ProfessorChadwell
    @ProfessorChadwell 4 місяці тому +2

    Nothing will ever make me take my East India Trading Co flag down in my bedroom, lol!

  • @Z-713
    @Z-713 4 місяці тому +2

    How are you?

    • @POPE_FRANC1S
      @POPE_FRANC1S 4 місяці тому +1

      Great thanks. U?

    • @TODBOO11
      @TODBOO11 4 місяці тому +1

      I know you weren't talking to me but I'm good.
      how are you?

  • @Curious_Bieng
    @Curious_Bieng 4 місяці тому +1

    India would have been much more successful & wealthy if Brits didn't loot us. We would have been more Indian culture focused & most importantly Hindus & Muslims would have been living peacefully & there would have no India, Pakistan & Bangladesh, just one nation called Bharat. Also, as There would have been no Separate India & Pakistan, USA & USSR would not have made respective countries their proxy in cold war & there is possibility that many terrorist groups would not have been born.

    • @Iron-Bridge
      @Iron-Bridge 2 місяці тому

      It would be way easier to call the entire land Bharat than all the tiny countries we have now.

    • @mudra5114
      @mudra5114 2 місяці тому

      What garbage. India most likely would have been more poor and backward as well as disunited without the British Empire. Also Muslims would have prayed on Hindus as the Deobandi school of Islam was taking root.

    • @mudra5114
      @mudra5114 2 місяці тому

      What garbage. India most likely would have been more poor and backward as well as disunited without the British Empire. Also Muslims would have prayed on Hindus as the Deobandi school of Islam was taking root.

    • @mudra5114
      @mudra5114 2 місяці тому

      What garbage. India most likely would have been more poor and backward as well as disunited without the British Empire. Also Muslims would have preyed on Hindus as the Deobandi school of Islam was taking root.

    • @mudra5114
      @mudra5114 2 місяці тому

      What garbage. India most likely would have been more poor and backward as well as disunited without the British Empire. Also Muslims would have prayed on Hindus as the Deobandi school of Islam was taking root.

  • @panos617
    @panos617 3 місяці тому

    fIrSt oRdEr is lame. Galactic Empire didn't fall after Sidious three deathes.
    Yea I am STAR WARS EU Fan.

  • @HankBukowski11
    @HankBukowski11 2 місяці тому +1

    A UA-cam video could not bem so uninteresting and unappealing to listen.
    I retained nothing of what you Said.

  • @anubisgod23
    @anubisgod23 4 місяці тому +5

    I've mixed feelings. It is easy to look back retroactively on the past and apply modern moral values to the actions taken but that is dishonest and lacks context. In my view, "evil" requires malicious intent for the sake of doing harm. The EIC never did anything purely for the purpose of causing harm, it was always for money.

    • @Vroomfondle1066
      @Vroomfondle1066 4 місяці тому +2

      Love of money is the root of all evil...

    • @anubisgod23
      @anubisgod23 4 місяці тому +1

      @@Vroomfondle1066 eh

    • @Vroomfondle1066
      @Vroomfondle1066 4 місяці тому

      Bible Reference: 1 Timothy 6:10 'For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.'
      @@anubisgod23

    • @CorinnaAtHome
      @CorinnaAtHome 4 місяці тому +1

      Isn't modem harm done in the name of money, too?

    • @mikitz
      @mikitz 4 місяці тому +1

      Lots of evil deeds can be made, even though unintentionally, in the pursuit of wealth.
      Especially if the ends justify all means.

  • @charleslarrivee2908
    @charleslarrivee2908 4 місяці тому +2

    It's just...good business.

  • @threlonmusketeers9371
    @threlonmusketeers9371 4 місяці тому +1

    You said it brought universities lmfao, google Nalanda University

  • @juharon
    @juharon 3 місяці тому +2

    still not as greedy as EA

  • @zhongxina728
    @zhongxina728 4 місяці тому

    duh!!

  • @vibeymonk
    @vibeymonk 4 місяці тому

    DNA.

  • @s.v.848
    @s.v.848 3 місяці тому +2

    What is all this gay moral lecturing? I will be the one to decide what is and is not evil. I just want to hear historical facts from you. In my opinion this is quite infantilizing from you, assuming your audience isnt capable of having their own moral compasss instead they need you like mommy to tell them what is a no no.

  • @sarahfranco6802
    @sarahfranco6802 4 місяці тому +1

    12:30, 12:45, 14:00

  • @Nomadith
    @Nomadith 4 місяці тому

    G E K O L O N I S E E R D

  • @EdwardConnors
    @EdwardConnors 4 місяці тому

    where r the funny vids? lol

  • @da90sReAlvloc
    @da90sReAlvloc 3 місяці тому +1

    Rule Britainnia Britainnia. Rules the waves

  • @Watch-0w1
    @Watch-0w1 4 місяці тому +2

    A
    Libertarianism wet dream.

  • @murrayvonmises
    @murrayvonmises 4 місяці тому +2

    Doesn't sound that horrible to me, but I understand the need to label these things so the sensitive beings who cannot think for themselves and draw their own conclusions from universal principles don't get their feelings hurt. Great video nonetheless.

    • @TAKOHUMU
      @TAKOHUMU 4 місяці тому +9

      Please, for all the “sensitive beings who cannot think for themselves” explain why you don’t think this was horrible

    • @mercx007
      @mercx007 4 місяці тому

      Back when Europe was great and not woke

    • @giantmastersword
      @giantmastersword 4 місяці тому +4

      They skipped over the wars that EIC waged on dissenters. Those got extremely ugly. Thousands died.

    • @murrayvonmises
      @murrayvonmises 4 місяці тому

      @@TAKOHUMU
      > "Please ... who cannot think for themselves ... explain"
      Case in point. You want me to do your thinking for you... Tiring.
      The same slushy minded idiots again and again..

    • @Pistolita221
      @Pistolita221 4 місяці тому

      @@mercx007 lmao yes if only we didn't have cures/preventative care for polio, measles, whooping cough, pertussis, tetanus, the black plague and you were a feudal serf maybe you'd have died young enough for us to not hear from you. #MAGA MAGA MAGA.

  • @Buy_YouTube_Views_a050
    @Buy_YouTube_Views_a050 4 місяці тому

    You've got a new follower!