In that case the shooter confirmed he fired the shots... the shooter never denied the incident he only thought it was the intruder, that was his version and thought he shot at the intruder but he never denied that he is the shooter..
I think he is for the State, and knowing very well that those witnesses will come and agree with Mangenas ballistic report... its a way for the Judge to maybe discredit the defence ballistic expert evidence... 4 against 1, is to just justify it prior to him coming... my opinion😅😅
I like this part of high profile case cross examined by Adv Mnisi.🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Mangena . Testified
G.Nel prosecuter
Deceased R .Steenkamp
Oscar .
Mangena WON
In that case the shooter confirmed he fired the shots... the shooter never denied the incident he only thought it was the intruder, that was his version and thought he shot at the intruder but he never denied that he is the shooter..
😮
Judge trying very hard to prove the defense why judge has to decide who the state to call????
he want more evidence
I think he is for the State, and knowing very well that those witnesses will come and agree with Mangenas ballistic report... its a way for the Judge to maybe discredit the defence ballistic expert evidence... 4 against 1, is to just justify it prior to him coming... my opinion😅😅