Christopher Hitchens at Mario Savio Memorial lecture part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • november 21, 2002
    webcast.berkele...
    The Mario Savio Memorial Lecture features Christopher Hitchens in a free-wheeling discussion with author-journalist Adam Hochschild.
    The topic of the lecture is "Fault Lines: Rights, Wrongs & Responsibilities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, Palestine, and The Nation".

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @JoshuaCromarty
    @JoshuaCromarty 12 років тому +2

    Hitchens is absolutely correct about Kissinger. Yet until his dying day he defended the actions of the Bush white house in Afghanistan and Iraq. Hitchens himself shares responsibility for the atrocious crimes of US imperialism in the early 21st century.

  • @shrapn0
    @shrapn0 12 років тому

    Brilliant upload. Thank you.

  • @surelady
    @surelady 13 років тому

    Thanks for sharing this, haven't seen it before.

  • @interestingyoutubechannel1
    @interestingyoutubechannel1 12 років тому

    his argument for iraq & afghanistan isn't that it was faultless, but that an intervention was necessary, and that the outcome (despite disasters in due course) was successful for many reasons.

  • @gulshabbo
    @gulshabbo 13 років тому

    @Giovannisenzaterra He was one of the leaders of the Free Speech Movement at the University of California, Berkeley in the 1960s.

  • @JoshuaCromarty
    @JoshuaCromarty 12 років тому

    Finally, Trotsky's revolutionary internationalism is not a parallel but a polar opposite of imperialism. To the destructive conflict between rival nation-states for military domination over the resources of the globe for the benefit of their respective ruling elites is counterposed the revolutionary overthrow of imperialist and capitalist systems, the unification of the world under the leadership of the world's working people and reorganization of world economy to meet the common needs of all.

  • @Hoopmov
    @Hoopmov  13 років тому

    @surelady i figured i should put it on youtube before the berkeley website, through accident or intention, makes it unavailable.

  • @JoshuaCromarty
    @JoshuaCromarty 12 років тому

    As for Al-Qaeda they were created by the CIA as a proxy army against the Soviet army in Afghanistan in the 80s. They were hostile to Saddam's secularist regime and didn't appear until after US invasion. But it is acknowledged in US military circles that Al Qaeda is once again a useful asset in both last years war on Libya and the current operations for regime change in Syria - a conflict which is reinvigorating their activities across the border in Iraq.

  • @arniemazmax
    @arniemazmax 13 років тому

    Hitch is a Rock Star

  • @Hoopmov
    @Hoopmov  12 років тому

    @shrapn0 Right on. Please share around.

  • @Giovannisenzaterra
    @Giovannisenzaterra 12 років тому

    @stronghurst1 .in a perfect Ted Haggart and catholic bishop's style

  • @Giovannisenzaterra
    @Giovannisenzaterra 13 років тому

    @gulshabbo Thanks

  • @interestingyoutubechannel1
    @interestingyoutubechannel1 12 років тому

    @JoshuaCromarty I didn't get ur point about me being israeli? On trotsky, communism is always used as a guise for a kind of imperialism, better defined as fascistic expansionism.

  • @JoshuaCromarty
    @JoshuaCromarty 12 років тому

    An intervention by imperialism was necessary? For someone who considered himself a Trotskyist at one stage this is an abysmal conclusion to reach. But in what ways were the assaults on Iraq and Afghanistan successful and for who? Certainly not the million-odd dead or the millions more wounded, orphaned, driven from their homes by ethnic terror or those who remain and must try to scratch a living from the shell of societies they once inhabited. And certainly not the troops sent to do the dirty.

  • @MrCarelo
    @MrCarelo 13 років тому

    Kick ass Hitchens :D

  • @interestingyoutubechannel1
    @interestingyoutubechannel1 12 років тому

    well u cud argue trotsky's agenda of making the whole world communist, can be paralleled to imperialism. the iraqi&afghan people wanted regime change, fought&risked their lives for it, its not imperialist to help them, not to mention the overwhelming evidence of al qaeda's presence in hussein's iraq, & pakistani 'imperialist' conquest of afghanistan. the way it was carried out is different to the point that an intervention by the west was Needed, that's his point & mine.

  • @interestingyoutubechannel1
    @interestingyoutubechannel1 12 років тому

    @JoshuaCromarty I dont like labels like trotskyist bcoz of identity politics like "the blood all lies in the hands of US imperialism". This insults the ppl of iraq & afghanistan whose victims of islamofascist tyranny remain voiceless by ur imbalance.

  • @interestingyoutubechannel1
    @interestingyoutubechannel1 12 років тому

    @JoshuaCromarty hh Where do u get ur info? Who's hostile to the west there aside from islamists? Welcoming regime change are all who suffered under it. Out of these, many wanted our help e.g. the kurds, marsh arabs, afghan hazaras etc. Wrong, al qaeda was in iraq before the US.

  • @Giovannisenzaterra
    @Giovannisenzaterra 13 років тому

    who's Mario Savio?