STATUS of ABU HANIFA. And there is no doubt in our view that Abu Haneefah was one of the truthful - but this is not enough for his ahaadeeth to be accepted until there is added to this precision and memory - and that is not established from him - may Allaah have mercy upon him, rather the opposite is established by the witness of the ulemaa whom we have mentioned - and they are those whose witness if accepted, will not lead the one who follows them astray - and that this is no way alters the position of Abu Haneefah - may Allaah have mercy upon him - as regards to his deen, piety and fiqh…since how many scholars, judges and pious people have had there memories criticised by the scholars of hadeeth and likewise their lack of precision - but none of that is taken to be a criticism of their deen or trustworthy character. And this is known to those who occupy themselves with the biographies of narrators - and the likes of this are the Qaadee Muhammad ibn Adur Rahmaan ibn Abee Laylaa, the scholar Hammaad ibn Abe Sulaymaan, the Qaadee Shareek ibn Abdullaah, and Abbaad ibn Katheer and others…."
• The Hanafi Books: When were they written? I. Qudoory 5th Century AH II. Hidayah 6th Century AH III. Qaadiy Khan 6th Century AH IV. Fatawa Saraajiyah 7th Century AH V. Kanz 8th Century AH VI. Nahayah, Sharh Waqayah, Anayah 8th Century AH VII. Tahtawi 8th Century AH VIII. Jami ur Ramooz 8th Century AH IX. Fath ul Qadeer 9th Century AH X. Bazaziyyah, Khalaash, Kaydooriy, Hilyah 9th Century AH XI. Bahr ur Raqaiq, 10th Century AH XII. Tanwir ul Absaar, Zahiratul Uqbaa 11th Century AH XIII. Fatawa Khariyyah, Shaamiy, Durr ul Mukhtaar 12th Century AH XIV. Fatawa Alamgheeriy completed with the agreement of five hundred Hanafi ‘mujtahids’, 12th Century AH XV. Maraaqiy ul Fallah, Malaa Budd, Umda Radiyah 13th Century AH Not one of these books was authored by Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah), the Imam that you claim to follow. These books ascribe statements and fatawa to Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah) usually without chains of narrators (isnad) that reach him. Whose madhab are you following? There are thousands of other books like these, each book contradicting many others, several different fatawa for the same question, where is the so-called ‘solidified madhab based upon centuries of enhancements’?
Subhan ALLAH ❤ jazakallahu khair ❤
Waaah masha allah
I guess it is kinda off topic but does anyone know of a good site to watch new tv shows online ?
@Magnus Barrett Try flixzone. Just search on google for it =)
سبحان اللہ علم اسکو کہتے ھیں ۔
Maseehul uloom Bangalore me seminar Huwa tha shayad 2011 ya 2012 me pls wo bayanaat upload Karen ...
ua-cam.com/channels/TyJamIk0ub_wpb3tQVUvzw.html
Subscribe this channel for islamic videos and documentories
But the Contents are from the first century
What do you mean by contents?
اللہ کا خوف کرو انسان دھریہ بنے لیکن بےغیرت دیو نہ بنے
بے غیرت غیر مقلدین ھوتے ھیں ۔
غیر مقلدین کے دماغ میں بھیجے کی جگہ گوبر بھرا ھوتا ھے ۔اسلئے علمائے اھل سنت والجماعت کی باتیں سمجھ میں نہیں آتیں ۔
STATUS of ABU HANIFA.
And there is no doubt in our view that Abu Haneefah was one of the truthful - but this is not enough for his ahaadeeth to be accepted until there is added to this precision and memory - and that is not established from him - may Allaah have mercy upon him, rather the opposite is established by the witness of the ulemaa whom we have mentioned - and they are those whose witness if accepted, will not lead the one who follows them astray - and that this is no way alters the position of Abu Haneefah - may Allaah have mercy upon him - as regards to his deen, piety and fiqh…since how many scholars, judges and pious people have had there memories criticised by the scholars of hadeeth and likewise their lack of precision - but none of that is taken to be a criticism of their deen or trustworthy character. And this is known to those who occupy themselves with the biographies of narrators - and the likes of this are the Qaadee Muhammad ibn Adur Rahmaan ibn Abee Laylaa, the scholar Hammaad ibn Abe Sulaymaan, the Qaadee Shareek ibn Abdullaah, and Abbaad ibn Katheer and others…."
Go eat lollipops Sanaullah. Your Wahaabi Ulema are not even comparable to the dust of Imam Abu Hanifas shoes. What a dead ignorant brain you have.
@@SHAKHSIYAA what a reply👏👏👏🏼
• The Hanafi Books: When were they written?
I. Qudoory 5th Century AH
II. Hidayah 6th Century AH
III. Qaadiy Khan 6th Century AH
IV. Fatawa Saraajiyah 7th Century AH
V. Kanz 8th Century AH
VI. Nahayah, Sharh Waqayah, Anayah 8th Century AH
VII. Tahtawi 8th Century AH
VIII. Jami ur Ramooz 8th Century AH
IX. Fath ul Qadeer 9th Century AH
X. Bazaziyyah, Khalaash, Kaydooriy, Hilyah 9th Century AH
XI. Bahr ur Raqaiq, 10th Century AH
XII. Tanwir ul Absaar, Zahiratul Uqbaa 11th Century AH
XIII. Fatawa Khariyyah, Shaamiy, Durr ul Mukhtaar 12th Century AH
XIV. Fatawa Alamgheeriy completed with the agreement of five hundred Hanafi ‘mujtahids’, 12th Century AH
XV. Maraaqiy ul Fallah, Malaa Budd, Umda Radiyah 13th Century AH
Not one of these books was authored by Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah), the Imam that you claim to follow. These books ascribe statements and fatawa to Abu Hanifah (rahimahullah) usually without chains of narrators (isnad) that reach him. Whose madhab are you following? There are thousands of other books like these, each book contradicting many others, several different fatawa for the same question, where is the so-called ‘solidified madhab based upon centuries of enhancements’?
Sanaullah Sharif following Ibn Baz and the merrymen wahabis. 100 sects in the UK already salaf8s not allowed in each others Musjid. What a shame.
What is your tragedy??