SCOTUS and the Trans Rights Healthcare Case: Why It Matters | Amanpour and Company
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 гру 2024
- This week the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case from Tennessee concerning medical care for transgender minors. Masha Gessen, opinion columnist for the New York Times, listened to the oral arguments. They talk with Michel Martin about the salient issues.
Originally aired on December 11, 2024
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major support for Amanpour and Company is provided by Jim Attwood and Leslie Williams, Candace King Weir, the Sylvia A. and Simon B. Poyta Programming Endowment to Fight Antisemitism, the Leila and Mickey Straus Family Charitable Trust, Mark J. Blechner, the Filomen M. D’Agostino Foundation, Seton J. Melvin, the Peter G. Peterson and Joan Ganz Cooney Fund, Charles Rosenblum, Koo and Patricia Yuen, Barbara Hope Zuckerberg, and Jeffrey Katz and Beth Rogers.
Subscribe to the Amanpour and Company channel here: bit.ly/2EMIkTJ
Subscribe to our daily newsletter to find out who's on each night: www.pbs.org/wne...
For more from Amanpour and Company, including full episodes, click here: to.pbs.org/2NB...
This program is made possible by viewers like you. Please support your local PBS station: www.pbs.org/donate
Like Amanpour and Company on Facebook: bit.ly/2HNx3EF
Follow Amanpour and Company on Twitter: bit.ly/2HLpjTI
Follow Amanpour and Company on Instagram: bit.ly/3SaTUhk
Watch Amanpour and Company weekdays on PBS (check local listings).
Amanpour and Company features wide-ranging, in-depth conversations with global thought leaders and cultural influencers on the issues and trends impacting the world each day, from politics, business and technology to arts, science and sports. Christiane Amanpour leads the conversation on global and domestic news from London with contributions by prominent journalists Walter Isaacson, Michel Martin, Alicia Menendez and Hari Sreenivasan from the Tisch WNET Studios at Lincoln Center in New York City.
#amanpourpbs
Thank you M. Gessen!! So much love and respect for you--your intellect, your compassion and kindness, pushing us to think deeply.
Also, I deeply hear the analysis of how dumbed down the SC is now with Kavanaugh and Comey-Barrett. They are not intellectual rigorous people. That is obvious. Thank you, Justice Jackson!
Thank you PBS, and M. Gessen💌
Thank you for reporting on this topic. As a trans man myself I am so frustrated that all these people are talking about us one way or the other like we don't exist. We are real people. We know what's best for us. If you want to form an opinion then please ASK A TRANS PERSON. It is so sad that the government thinks they know more than doctors, therapists, parents, and kids about this. The fact that some politicians use this to say that parents and doctors somehow WANT kids to be trans. Most parents I know try everything until they finally accept this about their kid. We need to TRUST PEOPLE to make decisions about their own lives.. even if they are under 18 while under the care of their parents, doctors, and therapists. Puberty is one of the most damaging things that can happen to a transperson, and unfortunately puberty happens before we turn 18.
Thank you.
My surgery was over twenty years ago. Many of my (too often senior) peers have expressed the wish that we were the last generation that would have to get to adulthood before being able to live the lives we needed.
your arguments are based upon coddling the narcissistic ideas of unwell individuals ... cuz kind?
NO.
truth and the rights of women and children matter.
Puberty is a natural, biological process, not a disease.
They won’t allow the due process issue, because then the state bans on abortion would be overturned on the same topic. No govt agency should be controlling Americans’ healthcare decisions.
How would that overturn abortion? This Supreme Court tends to defer to the democratic process, if the people vote to ban abortion and cosmetic treatments for children, that's the will of the people. If the people vote to allow those things that their decision.
When did the democrats become so anti democracy?
Republicans be like 'We champion parental rights'
and when people actually do claim those rights they go 'no, not like this'
No parent has the right to abuse their child.
@@imperialmotoring3789Then you better not take your children to doctors. Healthcare is not abuse.
Can a parent cover their 8-year-old face with tattoos?
Parental rights have limitations. That is not a republican or Democrat thing
@@imperialmotoring3789 and withholding necessary medical care is abuse
Parents don't have a right to give kids who are having mental health issues drugs that permanently change their bodies.
Please have Dr Sopolsky from Stanford on . This is a medical issue. The Dr is the top neurologist that lectures on this . Knowledge is freedom.
truth is rare.
Asking children to wait until they turn 18 is not a medical crisis. Notice that in oral arguments, counsel for the government purposely avoided saying these treatments reduce suicide. Thats because the data does not support such a claim and an attorney cannot misrepresent facts or information to the court. Kids need to have time to grow into their bodies and can make these serious decisions when they turn 18.
26 years of age
agreed. It is just common sense.
That's right. You know what's best for a kid, rather than the kid themselves, in conjunction with their parents and multiple healthcare professionals. You should decide everyone's healthcare options because of how much better you know than everyone else.
First, puberty blockers are used. Then hormone therapy. Not until adulthood do a small amount of trans people receive bottom surgery. These people know who they are
You do not know what you are talking about beyond your uneducated opinion, and it shows.
No commentary on the state of healthcare of 99% of Americans who are suffering and dying from a predatory insurance industry. The Professional-managerial class can't get enough of ultra-niche issues as a way to distract the public from grabbing their pitchforks!
transing rich bratty children has been part of the distraction from decades of supply side, consumer based, fascism.
since the first Hollywood created puppet prez, Reagan.
trans rites for children is dark. very dark.
Despite what Masha suggested in this interview, there is NOT agreement among experts about whether Gender Affirming Care is the best medical care or even whether it's supported by evidence. Ask the UK and several countries in the EU what they're doing... it's not so clear.
Might be very clear but so many are afraid to actually say
Ask transpeople. As a trans man my only regret is not being able to transition MUCH earlier than I did.
Masha promotes a sheer propaganda..
More than 86 professional medical orgs including AMA, American Academy of Pediatrics, ACOG etc .. affirm gender affirming existence and care based on over 100 yrs of medical research and evidence based practice.
The (only) clinic in the UK was overwhelmed with the number of patients and made rush decisions. Some of them were wrong and caused harm. That's why they stopped the process and now only take kids that can be treated within the research program. The goal is to find out how to properly treat all gender non-conforming children.
thank you both. the discussion of the new attitude toward expertise and the loss of real intellectual engagement was particularly interesting.
Please have Dr Sopolsky from Stanford on . This is a medical issue. The Dr is the top neurologist that lectures on this . Knowledge is freedom. Thank you for having Masha Geesen on !
yes!
Dobbs undermined the legal basis for all substantive due process rights emanating from the previously accepted right to "privacy" as extended by Roe versus Wade in the case of abortion. Logically, if there is no constitutional "substantive due process right" to privacy, meaning right to dominion over one's body, then, just as in the case of abortion, there is no right to dominion over the right of the individual to choose gender-affirming care.
SCOTUS put itself on a slippery slope with Dobbs and feels queasy about going down that path to its logical conclusion: There is no right to privacy hence, the dominoes will begin to fall on the subsidiary rights stemming from the right to privacy: contraception, right to marry the person you love irrespective of gender or race, right to raise a family, et. al.
By concocting an equal protection analysis, they are trying to do a carve-out for equal rights for things like same-sex marriage. You do not have a privacy right to marry a person you love but (so the argument goes) it is not rational to treat marriage between same-sex couples unequal to the way in which you treat heterosexual couples.
SCOTUS has a credibility problem and at least some of the Justices do not want to see same-sex marriage go the way of Dobbs. Intellectually, that is a heavy lift and they will have a hard time trying to explain why same-sex marriage is protected under the equal protection clause but not the due process clause, since the discrimination is not based on exercise of a fundamental right (to marry who you want) it is based on gender, which is not a suspect classification (as for example, race).
Contrast the disdain for expertise in Physical and Mental Health Care with the absolute necessity for expertise in Weapons Technology and the race for Artificial intelligence Dominance.
Very interesting and informative video! Thank you for your attention to detail! 🍭💝
Lots of false data quoted here.
Motvated resoning by a trans journalist unchallenged by an interviewer who should know better. Gessen returned multiple times to the argument that legislators and judges don't have the medical knowledge to make this decision and that the various Ameircan medical associations are opposed to the law. Notable by its absence was any mention of the Cass Report or the position of other first-world nations regarding trans youth. There is a tremendous amount of debate over the benefits or harms and long-term effects of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on young people. This is relevant to the issue and should have been mentioned.
Additionally, Gessen tried to mimimize the size of the issue by saying that an infinitesimal number of youth seek medical care for transgenderism. Yet Gessen's own NYT reported that the number of trans-identifying youth had doubled from about 2017 to 2022. As recently as sx weeks ago, the NYT reported that 3.3% of high school students identify as trans and another 2.2% express gender uncertainty. A 2017 study found that 27% of CA students aged 12-17 believe that they are viewed as gender non-conforming. Surveys in some communities find that up to 15% of girls in certain middle and high schools describe themselves as transgender. There is an element of social contagion that must be acknowledged.
This is a complex issue that will not and should not be solved by legislation. Neither will following the advice of unconstrained activists help us arrive at a good solution.
The cass review is an anti trans politically motivated report that ignores all the studies that support gender affriming care while taking carry pick testimony of the very few detrantioners as if it's the majority experince with gender affriming care instead of the vast minority of the outcomes. Gender affriming care has higher success rates than nose jobs and hip replacements.
Stating this is a “contagion” is pure bigotry. Perhaps this generation doesn’t care about gender norms the way other generations did, and that’s just fine. Maybe a hundred years in the future, we won’t even identify ourselves as a specific gender, and that’s called progress. Dividing society into “two camps”, male and female has led to more problems in the world, especially for women and girls who many men view as the “weaker and lesser sex”. As a gender non conforming 52 year old, I’m here for it!
The bunkum Cass Report is not peer reviewed, and IT SHOWS.
Have you even read the Cass Report? It does not recommend bans on GAC.
I have no problem with medical expertise, as long as they are held fully accountable when they get it wrong.
I take Gessen's point that gender affirming care for minors is a niche concern, but "infinitesimal" may be an understatement. Best stats I can find say that there are 34 million kids age 10 to 17. 1.5% of that (no. of trans kids) is about 515,000. And 15% of that (number who actually seek transition care) comes to about 77,000. (I can't say these are absolutely accurate--just the best I can find quickly.) But as an order-of-magnitude estimate, 77,000 still seems like a lot of people. If the opponents of the care are correct--and that is far from firmly established--this suggests a lot of potential harm. But if the supporters of the care are right, this amounts to a lot of BENEFIT. Someone needs to find a way to conclusively and transparently (no pun intended) establish the evidence basis of this, and in a way that both sides will accept--if that is even possible in today's age of misinformation and magical thinking.
Thank you! I also think it’s a bit disingenuous for Gessen not to mention that the numbers are growing. Gessen and many others I’ve seen interviewed want to wave this away by saying it’s “niche”. Well, It’s not “niche” where I live. In fact it’s a booming growth industry that needs a lot more scrutiny.
There IS evidence. Every major medical association has concluded that it is safe and effective, including the American Academy of Pediatrics. Every one of these laws are passed over the objections of medical experts and people who have researched it. If there are places where it seems that there is a lot more of it happening, it's because those families have been forced to move to access that care because of those laws. We're seeing that here in Illinois. It's not a "growth industry," it's families being forced to flee to help their children.
@@user-og9zk9gz6z To be fair, Gessen didn't say "niche." I did. But we could use more facts and less speculation.
@@user-og9zk9gz6z it's growing because I would've come out at 13 instead of 33, but I couldn't because of an abusive father and a society that told me (and continues to tell me as a 40 year-old) that I am broken, worthless, and disgusting. The fact that you and so many others can't comprehend that there are still a ton of us in the closet because of societal hatred that threatens our safety, jobs, housing, and rights is absolutely unfucking believable.
Cass report concludes that no good evidential basis for gender affirming care
I think that a lot of doctors in the US are going to relocate after Trump takes office! We see that neonatal doctors are caught up in legal grey areas and don't want legal problems so leaving the country is beneficial so they will look to find a English speaking country that will take them in and pay a decent wage!
They have banned it all Europe. They maybe hard pressed to find any place that's a developed industrial country
This is one-sided.
Read the Respondents' amici briefs, such as WoLF's, for other sides: especially from feminists and other progressives.
I 2nd the motion to interview Dr. Sopolsky!
It matters to prevent kids from making bad decisions, and from adults taking advantage of such situations, both of which has happened too much.
An excellent interview. Gessen's point about the dangers of dismissal of expert & scientific evidence is spot on, and leaves people in peril of losing rights to lowest-common-denominator legislators.
United Kingdom just banned puberty blockers for gender affirmation care. Puberty blockers have unproven benefits and significant risks.
Any parents worth their salt will find ways to help their children.
In fact, I would imagine a healthy black market in these items will blossom.
Sux to be anti-trans
false
Being forced to go thru the wrong puberty has significant risks as well.
I think the proven benefit is a child who is trans is much less likely to commit suicide if they get the puberty blockers .
@@alyssashady How long have you been on puberty blockers Alyssa?
Mind blown but wow, I agree with Tennessee. Anything can be called a medical issue. People…..this is necessary I have to say. The number of factors that contribute to this issue really blow this up. Let them go through puberty! And not for nothin…….we lost this past election in part because of this issue.
With all due respect, what you don't understand is that puberty is one of the most damaging things mentally and physically a transperson can go through. Many many transkids can be and are suicidal during that time. Many of the effects are irreversible for life. Being trans is a real issue and for many people the cure is to transition. If puberty can be prevented the chance that a transperson can be more well adjusted in adulthood.
If they go through puberty, that is harmful and causes problems for a trans person. Think how rough puberty is for all kids, now think if you were assigned male and are actually female, but puberty changes don't fit for you.
Yet they have carve outs for minor cosmetic breast augmentations for girls and puberty blockers for elite gymnasts.
At least 85 professional medical orgs including AMA, American Academy of Pediatrics, ACOG etc .. affirm gender affirming existence and care based on over 100 years of medical research and evidence based practice.
you are obviously not trans. going through the wrong puberty is devastating emotionally and physically. i went through several hospitalizations in my late teens and 20s from un-aliving attempts and endured over a combined 12 hours of surgery with medical debt over 60k to try and fix what being forced through the wrong puberty did. i still have another 10 hours of surgery to go through but have to wait for it to be covered by insurance since i can no longer afford it.
Each of your videos is a real discovery! Thank you for your ideas! 😘🍭
Knowledge is freedom.
Information is not Knowledge.
Knowledge is not Truth.
Truth is not Wisdom.
We can’t wait until they’re adults for surgery?
I need to educate myself.
All I know is is this is a free country and the government needs to bud out of people’s medical decisions.
minors need consent for surgery period, so do we or don’t we belittle in parents rights like the right says we should?
Surgery is not recommended until adulthood, you avoid permanent changes until adulthood. Recommendations for gender care are actually extremely careful of the fact that kids may change their mind, that's why medications like puberty blockers are used, they're the least permanent. Detransitioners are very, very rare, but the field still accommodates them by prioritizing as many nonpermanent changes as possible first. You need to at least be on hormone therapy for a year and get a counselor eval before most surgeries, even as an adult.
And these are all recommended by WPATH, the same organization of doctors that these politicians are calling gender extremists.
There are literally nearly zero minors that have had surgeries. It is an extensive process in which many hoops must be jumped through before surgery.
"Gender affirming care" does not = surgery. There are many, many, many steps short of surgery that this ban threatens, all of them reversible. International standards of care for trans youth do not include sergery for minors. The most recent study by Harvard's Chan School of Public Health found little to no use of gender affirming surgery being performed on minors in the US. The ONLY such care that insurance covers--because it covers it for both straight and trans minors--is breast reduction surgery. In the case of Trans minors, Harvard found almost no instances of this surgery being done for minors being treated for gender dysphoria.
Surgery does not happen for kids. It simply doesn't. In rare cases, there MAY be breast reduction for people in their late teens. It NEVER happens for anyone who is still in puberty. EVER.
M Gessen - Very subjective opinions.
Is anyone really surprised that the MSM presents an unidentified trans reporter as an unbiased reporter on the topic?
Minors!! Children. Not adults.
This case is specifically regarding children. Don't make this out to be discrimination. Children need to be protected. Hormones and amputation cannot be reversed. The child will become infertile forever. If an adult wants to undergo these procedures, have at it. Children should not.
Surgeries are not recommended by doctors for pediatric gender care. Puberty blockers are until the age of 16 to prioritize as many nonpermanent changes as possible. When the blockers are stopped, puberty resumes where it was left.
Hormones are partially reversible, we've even found that procedures needed to preserve fertility, like oocyte retrieval for IVF, can even be done while the patient is still on hormone therapy.
The recommendations from WPATH are available to the public if you would like to read them.
Why are there often carve outs for minor girls to have cosmetic breast enhancement surgeries or elite minor gymnasts to have puberty hormone blockers? It is all about control of others and denial of certain parents rights.
Over. 85 professional medical orgs affirm gender affirming existence and care based on over 100 years of medical research and evidence based practice.
You know nothing about trans healthcare they are reversible look it up before commenting.
Hormone treatment only works while you are taking the hormones and puberty blockers are not hormones. Surgery is NOT the standard of care for minors. The only surgery that insurance covers for minors, regardless of their gender identity is breast reduction and a recent Harvard Chan School of Public Health study found almost no evidence that even breast reduction surgery is being done to minors with a gender dysphoria diagnosis.
Parents and doctors know their teen; you do not.
This is such an easy issue. In Tennessee there are people with religious beliefs against taking their child to the doctor at all, against any non-biblical care whatsoever . So ban all medical care for children under the age of majority in Tennessee. What could go wrong? Come on Tennessee legislators take the issue to it's logical conclusion! This is just a common sense issue. No need for experts. 🤣
Why do u justify hurting kids
This individual questioning what is being normalized is quite ironic.
This election was the ultimate self own for this ideology.
Ideology? Being trans isn’t a “belief.”
It would be nice if he would answer the question in regard to their and game.
Religious parents have had the privilege of controlling the medical care of their children and yet these parents do not. I had a friend who broke her arm in 1974. Her parents believed that God would heal the broken arm and doctors should not interfere. The doctors argued that the arm wouldn't heal properly and their child would suffer unduly. That argument was judged without merit in like of parental rights.
False comparison
It’s hard to believe this guy has really been following this case as he can’t articulate the arguments on the other side-clearly, he is not being offered as anything even approaching an objective analyst.
Have you considered that the timing of the lawsuits has more to do with the release of the Cass Review in Britain, which found that the evidence for the benefits of these medical interventions is poor or non-existent? As a result, many countries in Europe, including some which pioneered these interventions, are revising their approach.
It would be interesting to see what scientific basis those organizations that filed amicus briefs have for their position. Like in other fields of science, medical practice is driven by research, not ideology.
"The Cass Report" is a piece of medical propaganda that couldn't pass peer review. It has been debunked by many medical professionals since it was trotted out.
❤
OH, this is sad, so out of touch. I used to like Masha, but she is off the rails her. We knwo all about this sh*t, Mash, and you are lying.
MM……that’s a stretch to equate race and a mental condition
Mental condition?
Someone needs to do actual research.
Race is a made up construct, as we are all the same race or species. We have different ethnicities based on where our ancestors came from and our DNA. Gender dysphoria is NOT a mental condition in the negative way you use it (which is bigoted). It’s an illness that with proper care and nonjudgment, can result in someone living as they are meant to be, happy in their own skin.
Not for MENSA members like Justice "What is a Wuman" Jackson.
Seems Gessen has an evident conflict of interest....
This person speaking is?
Doesn't Masha have a 12-yeqr-old son? I.e. not all her children are grown, as she claimed.