Why cannot PAP explain why was brought up in parliament by opposition. As a citizen I want to hear the explanation and not to run opposition down. Only then I can decided what right or wrong, It Takes lots of courage to bring up issues for PAP to explain for citizens to understand and not to ask opposition to withdraw and apologise. Just explain what was brought up.
Jamus vs Chee: Jamus should be the one earning more than $1m salary package and the other is worth $20k a month. Tax moneys are hard earned moneys from the peasants. Its from their sweat, blood and tears. We must spend tax money wisely and PRUDENTIALLY
Issues after issues. Fiascos after fiascos. Policy issues after Policy issues. Clearly, even the blind of singapore can see that SG cannot be left to a One Party rule. We need to act now before the new citizens dwarf our local-born population. Look at Hong Kong
He insist to interprete it negatively but the fact is not so. He can have his opinion of the meaning while others have their right to mean it differently. Does he not understand the meaning of opinion and the fact that English is Ambiguous? Then come to my master class on English
The "urgency" cited aa excuse ir reason seems to be the weakest logic presented by the defensive cht. It seems that Opposition MPs are distracted and unable to see the elephant in the room though Hazel did questioned but i think someobe should have followed up to pursue more rigorously. Imho, the urgency cited is not a good reason and is flawed becos you dont pressure a gov to do things fast for you as shareholders of a company. What if the shareholder is linked to gov? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔💩💩💩💩💩💩🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🤣🤣🤣 who is the share holder? NE? Gov? GLC?
Bill amendment is not necessary at such urgency because it is not like covid type of cases where leading to life and deathupon criticality. Blocking and rejection is enough and now it is behind the scene of those working in partnership to have close door discussion of re evaluating and reviewing redesign the plan.🤔🤫🫣😅🤣😂be it it take years for restructuring open date is enough..
Agree! The MPs should have pursued harder on the urgency cited as reason. A gov should never feel compelled to rush to comply with anyone in the private sector. After all, it's just shareholders of the company. Gov's role is not to serve share holders of a company but to the People and country. I am a bit disappointed
Why cannot PAP explain why was brought up in parliament by opposition. As a citizen I want to hear the explanation and not to run opposition down. Only then I can decided what right or wrong, It Takes lots of courage to bring up issues for PAP to explain for citizens to understand and not to ask opposition to withdraw and apologise. Just explain what was brought up.
The problem with Ivory Tower
Jamus vs Chee: Jamus should be the one earning more than $1m salary package and the other is worth $20k a month. Tax moneys are hard earned moneys from the peasants. Its from their sweat, blood and tears. We must spend tax money wisely and PRUDENTIALLY
Is he not used to being challenged? I don't mean surrounded by yesmen. Why so angry and defensive?
Who vote that Chee Hong MP in office?
Uncle i don't know anything...Don't know anything... yah.. I only give grand speeches😂😂😂😂
Breakdown !
Issues after issues. Fiascos after fiascos. Policy issues after Policy issues. Clearly, even the blind of singapore can see that SG cannot be left to a One Party rule. We need to act now before the new citizens dwarf our local-born population. Look at Hong Kong
Who handpicked this guy ? Harry?
KNN give me another GRC $$$
Now im nomore no support me my Data going $0.
Let Dame done they cant done Tiece and Quartet, so many group in longer time why im just want to know.im C4
He insist to interprete it negatively but the fact is not so. He can have his opinion of the meaning while others have their right to mean it differently. Does he not understand the meaning of opinion and the fact that English is Ambiguous? Then come to my master class on English
OP always waited until the gov or press releases the findings then start to make queries and arguments 😂 but never once solve anything prior to..
Are you sure? 😅😅😅
Jamus someone asked you to produce evidence so do yourself justice
The "urgency" cited aa excuse ir reason seems to be the weakest logic presented by the defensive cht. It seems that Opposition MPs are distracted and unable to see the elephant in the room though Hazel did questioned but i think someobe should have followed up to pursue more rigorously.
Imho, the urgency cited is not a good reason and is flawed becos you dont pressure a gov to do things fast for you as shareholders of a company. What if the shareholder is linked to gov? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔💩💩💩💩💩💩🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🤣🤣🤣 who is the share holder? NE? Gov? GLC?
Bill amendment is not necessary at such urgency because it is not like covid type of cases where leading to life and deathupon criticality. Blocking and rejection is enough and now it is behind the scene of those working in partnership to have close door discussion of re evaluating and reviewing redesign the plan.🤔🤫🫣😅🤣😂be it it take years for restructuring open date is enough..
Agree! The MPs should have pursued harder on the urgency cited as reason. A gov should never feel compelled to rush to comply with anyone in the private sector. After all, it's just shareholders of the company. Gov's role is not to serve share holders of a company but to the People and country. I am a bit disappointed