So, Ukrainian's Kursk offensive cost the AFU the use of its best brigades in Donetsk allowing the Russians to more easily advance. Meanwhile, the AFU's most elite brigades get decimated in open areas within Kursk while a lot of their equipment gets destroyed. Sounds like an equation for disaster to me.
Don't underestimate AFU's ability to double down on their f*ck ups. I have a feeling they will be willing to sacrifice an entire division just to get their PR victory
Getting rid of general Zelushny was the biggest mistake Selensky made. And all because his general became too famous for his liking and that the general spoke his mind didn't sitt well witz Selensky either of course. Well, sacking generals that are too popular and successful has been a move we have seen since almost forever. And it almost never was a smart move...
@@cdeford2 I am no insider of course, but all I ever heard was that the general was growing more and more popular and was considered to be a favorite if it came to a vote. And that he told Selensky stuff the president didn't like to hear. Pro U. channels spoke about his growing popularity as well and that he did not agree to everything the president said as well. So it is not some R. propaganda to slander Selensky. I can be mistaken of course, but afaik there is nothing that hints at a coup or stuff like that.
sounds similar to ancient times. usually after this the army faltered and the kingdom / empire was thrown into disarray, or shortly crushed thereafter.
On the night of August 20, a series of fires broke out on military facilities in Europe which were involved in military supplies to Ukraine. A large fire broke out at the warehouses located on the outskirts of the city of Brasov in Romania. The facilities belong to the Eurotex company. The warehouses stored various military equipment, including UAVs, and medicines prepared for transfer to the AFU. The fire spread over an area of more than 10,000 square meters. 12 fire brigades were involved in its extinguishing. Another incident took place at night in Poland. Three trucks full of military equipment for the Ukrainian army burned out on their way from military warehouses to the airfield. The cargo included military equipment, casques, bulletproof vests, and ammunition. As a result of the fire, the loud secondary detonation was heard in the villages of Aleksandrovitsa and Muravitsa located nearby. These are far from the first mysterious incidents on military facilities in European countries, involved in military supplies to the war-torn Ukraine.
@@namur-iq6ih fake news, at least the part about Poland. Not a single such incident took place in recent memory, I've just invested 10min to dig something up. Even the village names that sound remotely similar to what you mentioned (the ones in your comment simply don't exist) are over 300kms apart and separated by large (over 250,000 residents) cities. This leads me to believe the Romanian part of your comment is fake too.
I simply do not understand what the whole point of this Kursk offensive was. Did they really expect that they could just grab a bunch of Russian land of limited strategic significance and trade it during peace negotiations? But the Russians have not even given any guarantees that they would even take part in any peace negotiations yet. Did they think they could capture the Kursk NPP and blackmail Russia? The Kursk NPP is 60+km from the border, there is no way to hold it even if they did capture it. Was it to draw Russian troops away from other fronts to defend Kursk? That could not have been it either, since the Ukraninians themselves drew troops away from the other fronts for the Kursk operation. No matter how you look at it, it simply does not make any strategic sense.
It's hard to say. I do think that russian territory probably holds 'some' negotiating leverage. And that the area needed to contain the incursion is larger than the area of the incursion itself, so it 'might' draw more russian forces from the main lines than ukrainian. It's also possible that Ukraine thought they would try fighting in an area where they could 'try' to apply F-16's to the battle (which definitely won't work very well). But I think all it did was solidify russia on deciding to aim to take everything east of the Dnieper (the whole east half of ukraine). I think Ukraine doesn't have any "good" options available though. So they chose one of their bad option which would re-shuffle the deck a little bit, and then crossed their fingers. It satisfies the principal of hitting where a foe is weak, and the principal of being unpredictable. But that alone isn't enough to win at chess. I do think that when a side is losing in a conflict, they are in desperation, and all desperate options are poor. And history is a little too eager to call a desperate act "mistake" even though pretty much every available option would be called that after the loss.
@@sebastijanglozinic8630 I know who has your answers! Joe Biden and his Washington elites in the Pentagon! They have masterminded this entire fiasco, Im surprised you couldn't see their fingerprints all over it.
@@alanr2609 They failed to capture a bog city. Their advances have halted or with small gains around their sector. They control forests. Bad place to be on enemy ground. They will have a bit more gains, but Kursk city is lost. Without it, they don't have anything to bargain with the Russians who won't be exchanging anything for 1000-2000sq km of forests. They will pummel all.
That’s why they’ve destroyed columns of Russians and trapped a few thousand Russians there? Living in denial. That little area you led with was all the Russian progress. They’ve abandoned the rest of the front to reinforce Kursk. It’s Russia who are out of moves and in”check”
@@Dimension37 It suspect the complete disaster is Ukraine's decision to redeploy elite units from the Pokrovsk front to the Kursk front, because it was the elite units that slowed down Russian advances there, allowing the others to prepare the next line of defence when one line of defence was taken. Also, pay attention to Weeb's last words: the Ukrainians are taking heavy casualties in the open fields in the Kursk offensive, which is whence Syrsky got his nickname "general 200", "cargo 200" being the transport of dead bodies.
At this point, Ukraine is just training a very large Russian fighting force. Russia will emerge from this, with the best trained and most integrated military in the World, bar none. They won't be peer to NATO, but superior.
This has god to be the most perfect mental gymnastics I’ve ever seen in my life. “We aren’t loosing ground and having thousands of troops captured. No. We are training our army (apparently Russians have no other way to train lmao)
@@Annou7layou do not understand much if you think this is not true. Every military is green until forged in combat, and a combat forged army is much more competent. As long as you balance it with replacement of losses, you end up with a much stronger force. This is what happened in all winning nations in WWII, in case you don't believe me. Why else do you think every army from the Red army to the US army ended up much more competent than at the beginning of WWII? It is dangerous to fight your enemy and not win - the enemy grows stronger You can even see the same phenomenon on BOTH sides in this very war!! The Ukrainian army is much more competent than it was in 2022, and the Russian army is much more competent than it was at the end of 2022-start of 2023. The rebels prior to the war also turned into a tough nut for Ukraine to crack. The difference is that Russia has a superior ability to replace its losses in men and materiel, while Ukraine is slowly losing. It is a disgusting Anglo Saxon fantasy to believe that making Slavs fight themselves will somehow weaken Slavic nations. Apart from the disgusting attitude to human life, the winner actually ends up with a much more competent military that will pose a long term threat. Meanwhile all Anglo Saxon and most western nations are being tunnelled out from the inside by demographic conquest and low birth rates, disruption in their core social order through excessive immigration, and tunnelling out of their economies and industrial capacities. It is a desperate situation that these countries should focus on and bring to heel, and I speak as an Australian. Yet instead they are distracted by escapades elsewhere. In 100 years, I doubt if many western ethnic groups will even exist as majorities in their countries! In the long term, it is the BRICS countries that gain strength
Hi Weeb Union, ptiche means a little bird or baby bird. It is a deminutive. There are only two silables PTI-CHE (not 3 P-Ti -Che). Same word exists in Srbian language - my native language and we sometimes omit P in front of the T. That P is not very loud anyway, pronounced so close to T :-). Thanks for your work, updates and unbiased approach. I prefere to know truth than doctored reports.
Believe it or not I’m pretty sure it’s an aviation bomb UMPB D-30 it’s basically a small diameter bomb with a ramjet umpk glider and krasnopol laser guidance Orlan drones can tag moving vehicles and guide the bombs
Avdivka and bahkmut had ten years and many billions invested in fortifications with the top officials all think tanking for years about all the ways it could go. Those two cities are out of the way now. This is the last major city strong hold major highway rail hub that connects all the fronnt line cities from the very south to the very north. When Russia gets pokrovsk it will be the equivalent of if Ukraine was able to cut russias land bridge and get mariouple back. It is absolutely a disaster. Everything that is coming in as supplies for Ukraine will not be able to be hidden. Way out in the open on long highways
The us said they will conquer 5 middle east countries including iran in 5 years. 20 years later, they upgrading taliban militia into a full fledged modern military.😂😂😂
@@justapassione5554the us army military conquered Afghanistan and Iraq but weren’t equipped to nation building. Propped up phony democracies but to change a culture is impossible
@@ShadyHub9 nope 16 years empty promises to join NATO. And what? Mark Milley quote about "3 days?" And wrecked power grid, the loss of 20% of their territory (so far), and hundreds of thousands dead, wounded, or missing. The 45 million strong Ukraine that received those lofty promises so long ago is now a shattered and battered husk with perhaps 25 million citizens left. From NATO, they receive too many words and far too few shells, vehicles, and air defense interceptors.
@@ShadyHub9 well, what happened to the " Russia can't fight" Russians ’s are too stupid to win?" Did their masters tell them to keep fighting because it was going to be easy to beat Russia?😂
It's pretty obvious that Ukrainians likely did carry it out on the orders of America though so at least they aren't just keeping quiet. You have potential for the US role coming out as long as they are going after someone for it
During the course of Ukraine-Russia war we can see the ACCURACY of ISKANDER MISSILES. I read an article before saying ISKANDER MISSILES are NATO's dilemma. Well, from what I observe that might be true.
@@do.ro99 All people have a certain bias. But the progress on the ground is reported more or less accurately. Ukraine lost New York, and their well fortified lines are crumbling, while Russians have trouble stopping Ukes in poorly fortified and defended area. But the Ukes has slowed down, they will take some more villages, maybe cut the salient and that's it. Meanwhile they are loosing large & strategic places like Selidove, Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Chasov Yar, Kupiansk...
In another report about the 47th Brigade was they were no longer militarily capable and needed to be restored but now they are seen in Kursk. So one of the reasons why Kursk was started was to pressure Russia to move forces from the main frontline to Kursk, but instead it's the Ukrainians that keep moving elite forces (you know the one's that stay in the rear and threaten to shoot any Ukrainian that does not follow orders and push Russia back).
Any news about Ukraine forces is usually a lie. Dima reports what the propaganda is saying. The war was over in 2022 as Ukraine were already defeated 😂 according to propaganda
@@dukecheng5409it's pretty clear there is a significant manpower problem in the north from how effective the blitzkrieg was and how long it took to even slow it down. If men were abundant they would not have announced a move of units from Kaliningrad to Kursk. That is serious and shows how much propaganda we believed was true
Duran and Brian Berletic are liars and propaganda channels too. They literally just quote each other as evidence, which isn't evidence as they are friends. Then their lies start spreading, despite the lack of evidence other channels start talking about what Duran made up as if it's true 🙄
I'm interested in the truth but so many people are interested in hearing comforting propaganda and lies, like geopolitics is a team sport or a movie, not an awful reality - it's a true indictment of the modern world
You will find there is more to the Kursk offensive than you realise. Could you tell me in a month that it is not a success? By the way, those alligator KA 52s, taking out three strikers with precision, have a standoff range of 15km out of the range of MANPADS.
Battle of the Bulge was huge success for Germany too, until it wasn't. The initial push was something to behold, but now week later ukraf advances are miniscule compared to Russian ones. Despite western media reports on no loses of ukraf, based on sat imagery they lost at least 30% of all tech and around 40% of troops deployed for kursk offensive. Their initial use of nato snatch assault tactics should have been the extent of ukraf operation in kursk or anywhere else along border
The weapon is an aviation bomb called UMPKB D-30 It’s a small diameter laser guided bomb with a ram jet glider and krasnopol gyroscopic laser targeting module
I have been hearing that the Russians are using the antiterrorism units in Kursk and not pulling manpower from the regular military units on the front. It’s a separate operation and they are not particularly interested in taking prisoners. A few deserters may survive but the rest will not make it back across the border.
Some people in the comment section still talk as if Ukraine doesn’t have a shortage of man power and weapons. And now they’re trying to tell us that Ukraine is getting wrecked in Kursk but “winning” at the same time ? Hats off too Zelensky, he knows how to play you ignorant folks.
@@jinkazama7491 Zelenksy is a over prescribed zombie. Thinks he’s doing a Hollywood production. It’s worrying that the western governments even entertain the addict
A question you won't hear asked in the news media: does Ukraine have any air cover over their forces on the new northern front? Nope. If this had been a regular US Army operation, there would have been hundreds of aircraft to protect the army and to make strikes against enemy targets behind the front. None of that here and they're unlikely to get it. because NATO countries still want to try to keep up the charade that they are not really active belligerents in the war (also, it's a fairly long way to fly up from Romania, the only country that has so far volunteered to host aircraft flying across Ukraine and close to the frontlines; Ukraine itself doesn't have any safe airfields except maybe in the extreme west)
Even if Ukraine had planes or NATO sent planes, the Russians have their own fighter jets and air defences which are too strong. Particularly in their own territory.
So, without any air cover how are they still managing to expand? I'm of course taking into consideration the UAF losses from Russian helicopters. I simply don't understand.
@@davidshapiro5616 They have AA systems and manpads, so they have cover. This war just shows that airforce only can work against undeveloped countries with obsolete or no AA.
ghost of kiev came from spacestation and jumped out dived into sea and then drove a sub launched a Torpedo and then swam with the torpedo , untill the torpedo hit a jet in the sky. yes you heard that right. Ukranians have some capability 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Using their rapid reaction elite forcesthe way they have in Kurks is the Robotyne pocket all over again. They attack, get bogged down, then pinned, and destroyed. Meanwhile the main front can no longer check Russian advances in any way. Oof.
According to Astra, seventeen places have already been identified in Russia and occupied Ukraine where illegal torture is carried out, mostly on Russian soldiers who still refuse to fight.
200 is Ukrainian military code for "killed in action". If I recall, it was Ukrainians who started calling Syrsky "General 200" for his ill-thought methods which result in large Ukrainian casualties.
They counterattacked to stop breakthroughs from making a whole fortified line useless. Donbass is fortified naturally defensible terrain, the only relative counter measure that Ukraine has in an attrition war. No better place for them to fight. What is the offensive in Kursk supposed to achieve?
@@bjorntorlarsson the point was to divert RU units from the Donbass I guess. The irony is that Ukraine is the one, diverting more troops to its Kursk endeavor. Meaning that other fronts including the Donbass one have even less defenders now.
@@bjorntorlarsson just to expand...for U there is the moral factor, the give me more weapons factor, the capture conscripts factor and many more. For NATO, it is the only opportunity they have to test their shit against a real opponent, not Afghan militants.
I like your big efforts to cover the war but I have trouble understanding your accent especially naming towns and villages, could you please show the names of towns in big visible letters cause all I hear is ivka ivka ivka, Thank you
Look up "Cargo 200". Apparently, it is military code used in Ukraine for "killed in action". It was Ukrainians who gave Syrsky that nickname "General 200" because of his poorly conceived tactics which result in heavy Ukrainian casualties.
Not at all. 1. If 47th is still in pokrovsk the situation is still very bad, if they are moving to Kursk it just becomes worse. 2. Ukraine has sent 2 additional mechanized brigades to Pokrovsk yet they're unable to stop the Russian advance, if the 47th is still there then they've simply become so weak that the situation simply has become too difficult for the Ukrainians and again the Kursk offensive just makes bad worse.
"Units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are being withdrawn from the Donetsk region, leaving entire front lines to their fate. It looks like we are "giving away" the region," DEPUTY Mariana Bezuglaya According to her, under such circumstances, the loss of Pokrovsk is a matter of the near future, and Toretsk is living out its last days. "But beyond Pokrovsky there is a direct route to Pavlograd, where there are no fortifications at all, then Dnepropetrovsk. Beyond Toretsk is the Kramatorsk agglomeration, and then the Kharkiv region… No equipment has been made for the administrative border of the Donetsk region," Bezuglaya added.
Hier, il nous disait que les russes étaient en fuite à Koursk, qu'ils étaient encerclés et à l'agonie, il nous disait aussi que les russes n'avançaient plus dans le Dombass.. Aujourd'hui, il nous dit que les russes avancent partout dans le Dombass, et qu'ils maintiennent la situation à Koursk, en détruisant tout ce qui bouge. Il a même changé la carte, en supprimant les zones jaune clair, jaune foncé, etc, pour montrer l'avancée de l'Ukraine, et il a supprimé les zones orange ou les russes étaient encerclés. À la place, il a juste mis un contour bleu sans précision. Que s'est-il passé quoi entre hier et aujourd'hui ???
I still see yellow symbols---Ukrainian fortifications---all over the place to the west of the line of contact. How long have they been there and how strong are they?
They started to build fortifications since 2014. Strong? As I understand it is like houses in a story about Wolf and 3 pigs. Some are very useful, and some were for money laundry. Pokrovsk is almost last line of fortifications (comparing what to thos fortifications from Pokrovsk to Russian border) after that it is much easier to get to Dniepr river.
@@cintielderdoria3947 Because it is a pointless operation that will not bring any substance to UAF and certainly won't impact the disastrous falling apart of Eastern front. UAF are advancing in barely defended areas. RU are advancing in multiple layered defenses, some set up for few years. If you can not use your own brain and pull logical conclusions, you are cooked if you rely on any MSM.
@@cintielderdoria3947a stalemate with heavy losses in armour and manpower is hardly something positive for Ukraine. The hype will die down, but they wont be able to return all of those scrapped vehicles and dead elite soldiers. Not to mention that they are rapidly losing fortifications in the Donbass, built from 2014, which could threaten city of Dnepr(there is pretty much nothing behind those defence lines in the donbass)
@@DavorGlasnovićEurope is the one with the most disadvantages though. Pitiful Euroids. Your production capabilities will go to US and China, because production in EU is no longer profitable. Seems like US and UK are planning to turn the EU into another kamikaze. Something like a big Ukraine.
It´s not a Stryker, its a German Marder IFV, Please correct and research millitary technology PLEASE It putss everything you say in doubt when you make such a big mistake on something obvious
Very good analysis especially on the use of Ukraine's best unites & equipment being drawn away and being used in Kursk and taking heavy losses in equipment/personnel
"Units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are being withdrawn from the Donetsk region, leaving entire front lines to their fate. It looks like we are "giving away" the region," DEPUTY Mariana Bezuglaya According to her, under such circumstances, the loss of Pokrovsk is a matter of the near future, and Toretsk is living out its last days. "But beyond Pokrovsky there is a direct route to Pavlograd, where there are no fortifications at all, then Dnepropetrovsk. Beyond Toretsk is the Kramatorsk agglomeration, and then the Kharkiv region… No equipment has been made for the administrative border of the Donetsk region," Bezuglaya added.
So, Ukrainian's Kursk offensive cost the AFU the use of its best brigades in Donetsk allowing the Russians to more easily advance. Meanwhile, the AFU's most elite brigades get decimated in open areas within Kursk while a lot of their equipment gets destroyed.
Sounds like an equation for disaster to me.
Russian propaganda is not to be beleived 😂😂😂😂
So illogical it may not be true. But you assume it is?
@@GeorgesPataponSince when are satelite and drone images from both sides Russian propaganda?
@@veljkokovacevic8667 for pro-Ukranians, reality is Russian propaganda.
Since it shows things he doesn't like @@veljkokovacevic8667
Complete disaster... just like my second marriage
Oof. Sorry mate.
With my 3rd Russian mail order bribe
You married her too?!?!?
@@DrakeBuilders Heres to the fourth one working out
Don't underestimate AFU's ability to double down on their f*ck ups. I have a feeling they will be willing to sacrifice an entire division just to get their PR victory
Getting rid of general Zelushny was the biggest mistake Selensky made.
And all because his general became too famous for his liking and that the general spoke his mind didn't sitt well witz Selensky either of course.
Well, sacking generals that are too popular and successful has been a move we have seen since almost forever. And it almost never was a smart move...
It depends on why he was sacked. Maybe he was planning a coup. Maybe Z wanted to weaken the Banderite element.
@@cdeford2 I am no insider of course, but all I ever heard was that the general was growing more and more popular and was considered to be a favorite if it came to a vote.
And that he told Selensky stuff the president didn't like to hear.
Pro U. channels spoke about his growing popularity as well and that he did not agree to everything the president said as well.
So it is not some R. propaganda to slander Selensky.
I can be mistaken of course, but afaik there is nothing that hints at a coup or stuff like that.
sounds similar to ancient times. usually after this the army faltered and the kingdom / empire was thrown into disarray, or shortly crushed thereafter.
Putin also sacked "General Armaggedon"... just for note.
At least Zaluzhny is having fun in an amusement park in the UK
On the night of August 20, a series of fires broke out on military facilities in Europe which were involved in military supplies to Ukraine. A large fire broke out at the warehouses located on the outskirts of the city of Brasov in Romania. The facilities belong to the Eurotex company. The warehouses stored various military equipment, including UAVs, and medicines prepared for transfer to the AFU. The fire spread over an area of more than 10,000 square meters. 12 fire brigades were involved in its extinguishing. Another incident took place at night in Poland. Three trucks full of military equipment for the Ukrainian army burned out on their way from military warehouses to the airfield. The cargo included military equipment, casques, bulletproof vests, and ammunition. As a result of the fire, the loud secondary detonation was heard in the villages of Aleksandrovitsa and Muravitsa located nearby.
These are far from the first mysterious incidents on military facilities in European countries, involved in military supplies to the war-torn Ukraine.
This appears to be fake news.
Good
The Ukrainian refugees wants the war to stop. The NATO criminals want to fight Russia to the last ukrainian. Evil
@@namur-iq6ih fake news, at least the part about Poland. Not a single such incident took place in recent memory, I've just invested 10min to dig something up. Even the village names that sound remotely similar to what you mentioned (the ones in your comment simply don't exist) are over 300kms apart and separated by large (over 250,000 residents) cities. This leads me to believe the Romanian part of your comment is fake too.
EU regulations need updating regarding flammable materials, bro..that's all it is.
This Is Nato attacking Russia not Ukraine Alone
No sh!t Sherlock. WTF is Russia gonna do about it? Thats the question.
@@Concerned_Citizen665 fight, apparently
Shit really?! Where are the f35s?!
@@Annou7la Currently unavailable due to technical issues.
@@cristianmorstabilini7826 and aliens and batman also togetjer with all Marvel studio
I simply do not understand what the whole point of this Kursk offensive was.
Did they really expect that they could just grab a bunch of Russian land of limited strategic significance and trade it during peace negotiations? But the Russians have not even given any guarantees that they would even take part in any peace negotiations yet.
Did they think they could capture the Kursk NPP and blackmail Russia? The Kursk NPP is 60+km from the border, there is no way to hold it even if they did capture it.
Was it to draw Russian troops away from other fronts to defend Kursk? That could not have been it either, since the Ukraninians themselves drew troops away from the other fronts for the Kursk operation.
No matter how you look at it, it simply does not make any strategic sense.
It's hard to say. I do think that russian territory probably holds 'some' negotiating leverage. And that the area needed to contain the incursion is larger than the area of the incursion itself, so it 'might' draw more russian forces from the main lines than ukrainian. It's also possible that Ukraine thought they would try fighting in an area where they could 'try' to apply F-16's to the battle (which definitely won't work very well).
But I think all it did was solidify russia on deciding to aim to take everything east of the Dnieper (the whole east half of ukraine).
I think Ukraine doesn't have any "good" options available though. So they chose one of their bad option which would re-shuffle the deck a little bit, and then crossed their fingers. It satisfies the principal of hitting where a foe is weak, and the principal of being unpredictable. But that alone isn't enough to win at chess.
I do think that when a side is losing in a conflict, they are in desperation, and all desperate options are poor. And history is a little too eager to call a desperate act "mistake" even though pretty much every available option would be called that after the loss.
At least everybody has to drive less far to play near kursk.
@@sebastijanglozinic8630 I know who has your answers! Joe Biden and his Washington elites in the Pentagon! They have masterminded this entire fiasco, Im surprised you couldn't see their fingerprints all over it.
Apparently, Russia wasn't as ready to negotiate as they thought. Which leads to the question "Why did they think that?"
They wanted the soyboy cheerleaders to do their little dance, for better morale
I like Weeb's map. (in the description). Thanks for the great updates!
You remain a good citizen, thanks for the long-time support!
@@frank-r5j8z This is not a videogame. Denazification is real.
@@frank-r5j8z Interesting use of the keyboard. It makes your comment almost as illegible as it is illogical, to be frank.
Kursk offensive is swan song of Ukr army.
This is NATO attacking Russia
@@atanasvasilev3228 this is NATO invasion of Russia
@@alanr2609 They failed to capture a bog city. Their advances have halted or with small gains around their sector. They control forests. Bad place to be on enemy ground. They will have a bit more gains, but Kursk city is lost. Without it, they don't have anything to bargain with the Russians who won't be exchanging anything for 1000-2000sq km of forests. They will pummel all.
That’s why they’ve destroyed columns of Russians and trapped a few thousand Russians there? Living in denial. That little area you led with was all the Russian progress. They’ve abandoned the rest of the front to reinforce Kursk. It’s Russia who are out of moves and in”check”
@@alanr2609 right now there’s no sign the Ukrainians are struggling in Kursk. The Russians on the other hand …
Huge thanks for this exceptional video. You seem to get better and better.
When you get a short title from weeb, you know it's going to be interesting
Sorta felt like clickbait ngl, it was just regular Russian progress, I’d argue 3 days ago this title would’ve been good.
@@ScenicCitysRealtor frrr
@@Dimension37 It suspect the complete disaster is Ukraine's decision to redeploy elite units from the Pokrovsk front to the Kursk front, because it was the elite units that slowed down Russian advances there, allowing the others to prepare the next line of defence when one line of defence was taken. Also, pay attention to Weeb's last words: the Ukrainians are taking heavy casualties in the open fields in the Kursk offensive, which is whence Syrsky got his nickname "general 200", "cargo 200" being the transport of dead bodies.
@@Donello they didn’t. They were in rotation anyway.
@@Annou7la What rotation? They have run out of men, what are you yapping about?
Zelensky is playing with the precious lives of Ukrainian youngsters!
Small hats dont care for young lives
Since 2022.
@@vaska1999 And Poroschenko was killing kids as long ago as 2014.
No, it's NATO doing that. Elensky is a puppet.
The Kursk offensive was a big mistake by zelensky
Agreed 👍
By that point the ukrainians have only the choice between misstake and misstake.
I can tell in Putin face,he might go live in North Korea for good,then what ! the whole world feel PEACE
Is this joke or what 😂@@fanech14
You mean a mistake by nato
At this point, Ukraine is just training a very large Russian fighting force.
Russia will emerge from this, with the best trained and most integrated military in the World, bar none.
They won't be peer to NATO, but superior.
This has god to be the most perfect mental gymnastics I’ve ever seen in my life. “We aren’t loosing ground and having thousands of troops captured. No. We are training our army (apparently Russians have no other way to train lmao)
@@Annou7la Time will prove me right.
@@Annou7layou do not understand much if you think this is not true.
Every military is green until forged in combat, and a combat forged army is much more competent.
As long as you balance it with replacement of losses, you end up with a much stronger force.
This is what happened in all winning nations in WWII, in case you don't believe me.
Why else do you think every army from the Red army to the US army ended up much more competent than at the beginning of WWII?
It is dangerous to fight your enemy and not win - the enemy grows stronger
You can even see the same phenomenon on BOTH sides in this very war!! The Ukrainian army is much more competent than it was in 2022, and the Russian army is much more competent than it was at the end of 2022-start of 2023. The rebels prior to the war also turned into a tough nut for Ukraine to crack.
The difference is that Russia has a superior ability to replace its losses in men and materiel, while Ukraine is slowly losing.
It is a disgusting Anglo Saxon fantasy to believe that making Slavs fight themselves will somehow weaken Slavic nations. Apart from the disgusting attitude to human life, the winner actually ends up with a much more competent military that will pose a long term threat.
Meanwhile all Anglo Saxon and most western nations are being tunnelled out from the inside by demographic conquest and low birth rates, disruption in their core social order through excessive immigration, and tunnelling out of their economies and industrial capacities. It is a desperate situation that these countries should focus on and bring to heel, and I speak as an Australian. Yet instead they are distracted by escapades elsewhere.
In 100 years, I doubt if many western ethnic groups will even exist as majorities in their countries!
In the long term, it is the BRICS countries that gain strength
Your 💯 right
@@ZappyOh
Hardly.
If the war ended right now then maybe.
But this will go on until both sides are exausted.
Excellent analysis . Thanks!
Thanks for the update Weeb!
Zelenskyy is saying on Sky News (UK) that the eastern front is “Difficult”
Difficult without coke... Is what he really wanted to say.
Hi Weeb Union, ptiche means a little bird or baby bird. It is a deminutive. There are only two silables PTI-CHE (not 3 P-Ti -Che). Same word exists in Srbian language - my native language and we sometimes omit P in front of the T. That P is not very loud anyway, pronounced so close to T :-). Thanks for your work, updates and unbiased approach. I prefere to know truth than doctored reports.
I strongly suspect that in Ukrainian "ptyche" is not a diminutive, but an adjective, like "belonging to birds" or "proper of birds".
Very interesting!
Can you please tell me the etymology of Ocheretyne ( a village in the Avdiivka front) if you know?
nobody cares
Thanks A!ec some of us are interested in the beautiful Russian language.
@@m.cl.ballista4642ocheret stands for cane in Ukrainian
Brilliant analysis 👍
The weapon the Russians used at Korenovo was a Tornado S. Laser guided via a drone.
Believe it or not I’m pretty sure it’s an aviation bomb UMPB D-30 it’s basically a small diameter bomb with a ramjet umpk glider and krasnopol laser guidance
Orlan drones can tag moving vehicles and guide the bombs
Toretsk will be second avdivka
nope. Avdeevka was super fortified
Nah I don't think it will last that long
No selfie from the Clown on its sign, equals rapid capture by the Russians 😅
Avdivka and bahkmut had ten years and many billions invested in fortifications with the top officials all think tanking for years about all the ways it could go. Those two cities are out of the way now. This is the last major city strong hold major highway rail hub that connects all the fronnt line cities from the very south to the very north. When Russia gets pokrovsk it will be the equivalent of if Ukraine was able to cut russias land bridge and get mariouple back. It is absolutely a disaster. Everything that is coming in as supplies for Ukraine will not be able to be hidden. Way out in the open on long highways
FABs….and adios.
Maybe the ukrainian general Syrskyi is doing this on purpose to weaken the AFU. But under the cover of various missions.
Getting rid of all the Nazis in their ranks.
He wanted to have at least one week of tactical success in his resumé from this war.
He is a yesman what else did you expect from him?
Damn this is just a drunken brawl at this point
Yup...a drunken brawl inside a glass shop with a waxxed floor and a broken light switch 😵
A drunken brawl inside a nuclear weapons control centre
It's giving War of the Triple Alliance-vibes.
it always is near the end.
Don't messed with RUSSIA...
or what? 😅 kiev in 3 days?
The us said they will conquer 5 middle east countries including iran in 5 years. 20 years later, they upgrading taliban militia into a full fledged modern military.😂😂😂
@@justapassione5554the us army military conquered Afghanistan and Iraq but weren’t equipped to nation building. Propped up phony democracies but to change a culture is impossible
@@ShadyHub9 nope 16 years empty promises to join NATO. And what? Mark Milley quote about "3 days?" And wrecked power grid, the loss of 20% of their territory (so far), and hundreds of thousands dead, wounded, or missing. The 45 million strong Ukraine that received those lofty promises so long ago is now a shattered and battered husk with perhaps 25 million citizens left. From NATO, they receive too many words and far too few shells, vehicles, and air defense interceptors.
@@ShadyHub9 well, what happened to the " Russia can't fight" Russians ’s are too stupid to win?" Did their masters tell them to keep fighting because it was going to be easy to beat Russia?😂
Infamous General Syrsky nickname, General 200. 😁😁
Or " Hero of the Russian Federation". 😂
Like from "Gruz 200"?
Or General Strategically not important 💀
German is blaming Ukraine for their losses since the Northstream sobotage.
Angalo-Saxon is one kind.
Germans aren’t Anglo saxons nor are they just Saxons that’s like calling Russia a Slavic country
@@RoCK3rAD people do call Russia a Slavic country, they are Slavic people.
Russia is Slavic @@RoCK3rAD
You are right Germany is not Anglo though. The Anglosphere is the English speaking nations, Britain's are anglo Saxons.
It's pretty obvious that Ukrainians likely did carry it out on the orders of America though so at least they aren't just keeping quiet. You have potential for the US role coming out as long as they are going after someone for it
@@RoCK3rAD well their leadership certainly acts as if they are, which is no wonder to people who are aware of who rules the "west".
During the course of Ukraine-Russia war we can see the ACCURACY of ISKANDER MISSILES. I read an article before saying ISKANDER MISSILES are NATO's dilemma. Well, from what I observe that might be true.
You know someone fucked up when you see this title
3 day special military operation is a failure
@@takasmaka820yeah right, with sjovels they could not do better😂
@@takasmaka820 going better than summer offensive 😹
@@takasmaka820🥱🥱
@@takasmaka820 Your 3-day special circus course by General Milley is a failure.
All i hear for the 1st 5 minutes is
The Russian's have CAPTURED 😅 CAPTURED AND CAPTURED 😂😂
Russian channel.what can you expect
@@do.ro99 ok ukraine captured a supermarket in kurks while loosing a coal mine in the donbass.
@@juamu1132 exactly people don't get it how meaningless and stupid the Kursk thing is
@@do.ro99 All people have a certain bias. But the progress on the ground is reported more or less accurately. Ukraine lost New York, and their well fortified lines are crumbling, while Russians have trouble stopping Ukes in poorly fortified and defended area. But the Ukes has slowed down, they will take some more villages, maybe cut the salient and that's it. Meanwhile they are loosing large & strategic places like Selidove, Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Chasov Yar, Kupiansk...
@@tomislavrasic7766seems pretty meaningful judging from how much the Russians say it isn't.
In another report about the 47th Brigade was they were no longer militarily capable and needed to be restored but now they are seen in Kursk. So one of the reasons why Kursk was started was to pressure Russia to move forces from the main frontline to Kursk, but instead it's the Ukrainians that keep moving elite forces (you know the one's that stay in the rear and threaten to shoot any Ukrainian that does not follow orders and push Russia back).
Russia is not Ukraine. They don't have manpower problem. So the very idea of mobilizing forces from Donbass to Kursk is already flawed.
Any news about Ukraine forces is usually a lie. Dima reports what the propaganda is saying. The war was over in 2022 as Ukraine were already defeated 😂 according to propaganda
@@dukecheng5409it's pretty clear there is a significant manpower problem in the north from how effective the blitzkrieg was and how long it took to even slow it down. If men were abundant they would not have announced a move of units from Kaliningrad to Kursk. That is serious and shows how much propaganda we believed was true
Duran and Brian Berletic are liars and propaganda channels too. They literally just quote each other as evidence, which isn't evidence as they are friends. Then their lies start spreading, despite the lack of evidence other channels start talking about what Duran made up as if it's true 🙄
I'm interested in the truth but so many people are interested in hearing comforting propaganda and lies, like geopolitics is a team sport or a movie, not an awful reality - it's a true indictment of the modern world
When you see those Ukrainian videos they are prior to the total destruction of those vehicles, with the sending of kinjall.
Its mostly Iskander. Idk about Kinzhal usage in Kursk.
17:02 "And this is exactly why he's called General 200", what a hard finishing line
You will find there is more to the Kursk offensive than you realise. Could you tell me in a month that it is not a success? By the way, those alligator KA 52s, taking out three strikers with precision, have a standoff range of 15km out of the range of MANPADS.
That's the problem with both sides. Wait until we see what's happening
Battle of the Bulge was huge success for Germany too, until it wasn't.
The initial push was something to behold, but now week later ukraf advances are miniscule compared to Russian ones. Despite western media reports on no loses of ukraf, based on sat imagery they lost at least 30% of all tech and around 40% of troops deployed for kursk offensive.
Their initial use of nato snatch assault tactics should have been the extent of ukraf operation in kursk or anywhere else along border
Yeah, let's reassess this in mid-September. I bet the situation will be even worse for Ukraine, but let's revisit this a month from now.
Fantastic work, great updates and analysis thank you Weeb
REPORT BELARUS BORDER PLEASE
@@spinnakerthegreat2612 They can't as they want to occupy Transnistria once their kursk fiasco is known.
Great analysis! 👍🏻
Who could have thought it... 😂😂
The weapon is an aviation bomb called UMPKB D-30
It’s a small diameter laser guided bomb with a ram jet glider and krasnopol gyroscopic laser targeting module
Thankyou Web. ❤
D McGregor said that from the initial force of 12000 soldiers, only 4-5000 are left, in Kursk, with no equipement.
I said out of the 120000 there are now 200000. They have been breading and so has there equipment. Who's right? We can't know!
McGregor has been wrong in almost every prediction he made…. Nice guy tho…
@@alanr2609 He's a lunatic and a dreamer. By his predictions Ukraine already capitulated 10 times
I have been hearing that the Russians are using the antiterrorism units in Kursk and not pulling manpower from the regular military units on the front.
It’s a separate operation and they are not particularly interested in taking prisoners. A few deserters may survive but the rest will not make it back across the border.
@@abrakadavra3193 well in 2y ukraine army lost 2 army
Some people in the comment section still talk as if Ukraine doesn’t have a shortage of man power and weapons. And now they’re trying to tell us that Ukraine is getting wrecked in Kursk but “winning” at the same time ?
Hats off too Zelensky, he knows how to play you ignorant folks.
Zelenksy is playing you and everyone like you that falls for the propaganda BS
@@pomg6512
And right off the bat he’s talking about going back to Zhaparozhia again. Which tells you exactly how project Kursk is going.
@@jinkazama7491 Zelenksy is a over prescribed zombie. Thinks he’s doing a Hollywood production.
It’s worrying that the western governments even entertain the addict
Looks like we'll see the fall of a couple larger cities in Autumn as well as the Russians reaching the Oskil.
Very interesting analysis of ukranian movements. Good job
They sent the 47th north? Heck, give them trucks!
A question you won't hear asked in the news media: does Ukraine have any air cover over their forces on the new northern front? Nope. If this had been a regular US Army operation, there would have been hundreds of aircraft to protect the army and to make strikes against enemy targets behind the front. None of that here and they're unlikely to get it. because NATO countries still want to try to keep up the charade that they are not really active belligerents in the war (also, it's a fairly long way to fly up from Romania, the only country that has so far volunteered to host aircraft flying across Ukraine and close to the frontlines; Ukraine itself doesn't have any safe airfields except maybe in the extreme west)
Even if Ukraine had planes or NATO sent planes, the Russians have their own fighter jets and air defences which are too strong. Particularly in their own territory.
Amerykańskie samoloty nad Rosją?? Czyli Rosyjskie nad ameryką
So, without any air cover how are they still managing to expand? I'm of course taking into consideration the UAF losses from Russian helicopters. I simply don't understand.
@@davidshapiro5616 They have AA systems and manpads, so they have cover. This war just shows that airforce only can work against undeveloped countries with obsolete or no AA.
@@xmeda nope it can work against crappy airforce like Russian.
remember the days where 'has managed to gain a foothold' was a big thing? now its casual.
If russians managed to cross the channel before Chasiv Yar… Then the situation in Soledar is difficult 😂
Military Summary channel said the 47th mechanized brigade has now lost its combat capability.
ghost of kiev came from spacestation and jumped out dived into sea and then drove a sub launched a Torpedo and then swam with the torpedo , untill the torpedo hit a jet in the sky. yes you heard that right. Ukranians have some capability 🤣🤣🤣🤣
My 🦌 frienz
Bro😂
Oh dear not this again.😂
I like the fact that you back the claims of Ukrainian/Russian advances with geolocated footage.
It’s over
Invading Russia via Kursk,
Napoleon failed,
Hitler failed,
Did anyone think Zelenski would do it???
But RasPutin was not in control at that time.
@@handsomeman-pm9vy Cocaineskyy is definitely not in control this time.
Using their rapid reaction elite forcesthe way they have in Kurks is the Robotyne pocket all over again.
They attack, get bogged down, then pinned, and destroyed. Meanwhile the main front can no longer check Russian advances in any way. Oof.
yeah but they still control russian land
@@mikesmoth-v4w loosing 10 to 20 armoured vehicles a day for temporary control over a small part of Kursk region is dumb though.
"We're winning!" - A famous short general
Followed by Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu !
Love your videos, good stuff. But hate the amount of total bs bot posts here. Comments will only get worse if this keeps going.
16:55 "...safety of the Donetsk front."
Huh?
According to Astra, seventeen places have already been identified in Russia and occupied Ukraine where illegal torture is carried out, mostly on Russian soldiers who still refuse to fight.
11:13 it could've been Tornado S 300mm arty MLRS
Umpkb d-30 laser guided small diameter bomb
Could you briefly describe me what this video about?
Why he call gendral 200?
Because he gets all his men killed
200 is a dead casualty, 300 is wounded.
Genderal 200? He is now!
200 is Ukrainian military code for "killed in action". If I recall, it was Ukrainians who started calling Syrsky "General 200" for his ill-thought methods which result in large Ukrainian casualties.
@@pineapplesareyummy6352 it is from Soviet times, cargo-200
Very good report.
Damn, that ending was hard!
Remember when pro Ukrainian accounts were claiming that the Kursk offensive would halt the Russian offensive towards Pokrovsk lol
Weeb, what about the F16's? Any news of what they are doing??
They've done a few missions but mostly in reserve til they get better missles
@silvertime7188 then it's F-16 season 😂
hiding
@@silvertime7188Till they can operate beyond S400 and R37 range..
They consider their life expectancy 😂
The last 2-3minutes simply brilliant
Where are Azov and Kraken?
Dead
The live on in our hearts like Bakmut
In Mariupol, 2 feet underground in an unrecognised tomb 😅
They're making it look easy, now that the troops who have been defending the Donetsk for so long have all bedn sent north, they've lost cohesion.
Why would Ukraine having ELITE soldiers defending a trench in Donbass? Does it not make more sense to have them in Kursk?
They counterattacked to stop breakthroughs from making a whole fortified line useless. Donbass is fortified naturally defensible terrain, the only relative counter measure that Ukraine has in an attrition war. No better place for them to fight. What is the offensive in Kursk supposed to achieve?
@@bjorntorlarsson Good question. I thought it was just another PR stunt but I begin now to see several benefits for all involved.
@@bjorntorlarsson the point was to divert RU units from the Donbass I guess.
The irony is that Ukraine is the one, diverting more troops to its Kursk endeavor. Meaning that other fronts including the Donbass one have even less defenders now.
@@bjorntorlarsson just to expand...for U there is the moral factor, the give me more weapons factor, the capture conscripts factor and many more. For NATO, it is the only opportunity they have to test their shit against a real opponent, not Afghan militants.
very interesting point abiut the elite units
The title
MonkaS
Just so you know, the 80 and 80 second brigades were pulled out of the Kursk sector due to being rendered combat ineffective last week
Kiyv when
UA-cam... erases comments. Fu, UA-cam
Ukrainian: In and out 20 minutes in Kursk
Reality: 💀💀💀
I like your big efforts to cover the war but I have trouble understanding your accent especially naming towns and villages, could you please show the names of towns in big visible letters cause all I hear is ivka ivka ivka, Thank you
What does "General 200" mean?
200 is Killed in action - so he is the general who produces many killed in action
Cargo 200 - [corpses] in soviet an post-soviet military codification and jargon.
Look up "Cargo 200". Apparently, it is military code used in Ukraine for "killed in action". It was Ukrainians who gave Syrsky that nickname "General 200" because of his poorly conceived tactics which result in heavy Ukrainian casualties.
300 is WIA
@@pineapplesareyummy6352 Ahh I see, that's pretty accurate tbh 😂
Thanks Weeb 🙏
Hello, Weeb. What about Belarus? Let us know, if you can
Thank you 👍
Odessa will be Russian again
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How old are you ? With this speed it will take decades...
odessa is not realistic.
@@janko6608 ...fewer decades than Ukraine taking Crimea.
@@robertsteele474 I am not saying that is realistic. But your vision is even more unrealistic.
The only trouble with your argument is that the 47th is still in Pokrovsk
Not at all.
1. If 47th is still in pokrovsk the situation is still very bad, if they are moving to Kursk it just becomes worse.
2. Ukraine has sent 2 additional mechanized brigades to Pokrovsk yet they're unable to stop the Russian advance, if the 47th is still there then they've simply become so weak that the situation simply has become too difficult for the Ukrainians and again the Kursk offensive just makes bad worse.
"Complete disaster"
>Taking empty fields
LMAO
wdym? Russia has advanced 150+ sq km this month compared to 30-50 since 2023. This is a disaster
"Units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are being withdrawn from the Donetsk region, leaving entire front lines to their fate. It looks like we are "giving away" the region," DEPUTY Mariana Bezuglaya
According to her, under such circumstances, the loss of Pokrovsk is a matter of the near future, and Toretsk is living out its last days.
"But beyond Pokrovsky there is a direct route to Pavlograd, where there are no fortifications at all, then Dnepropetrovsk. Beyond Toretsk is the Kramatorsk agglomeration, and then the Kharkiv region… No equipment has been made for the administrative border of the Donetsk region," Bezuglaya added.
and 3 bridges that service horse and carts
sounds like kursk
@@Dimension37Nobody shares your dimension, bro..
Hier, il nous disait que les russes étaient en fuite à Koursk, qu'ils étaient encerclés et à l'agonie, il nous disait aussi que les russes n'avançaient plus dans le Dombass.. Aujourd'hui, il nous dit que les russes avancent partout dans le Dombass, et qu'ils maintiennent la situation à Koursk, en détruisant tout ce qui bouge. Il a même changé la carte, en supprimant les zones jaune clair, jaune foncé, etc, pour montrer l'avancée de l'Ukraine, et il a supprimé les zones orange ou les russes étaient encerclés. À la place, il a juste mis un contour bleu sans précision.
Que s'est-il passé quoi entre hier et aujourd'hui ???
En français ce n'est pas vrai aussi. Regarde le video d'hier
Ty już lepiej nie pij😂
Je pense que tu confonds avec la vidéo de Dima
I'm not being allowed to 'like' this presentation.
I still see yellow symbols---Ukrainian fortifications---all over the place to the west of the line of contact. How long have they been there and how strong are they?
They started to build fortifications since 2014. Strong? As I understand it is like houses in a story about Wolf and 3 pigs. Some are very useful, and some were for money laundry.
Pokrovsk is almost last line of fortifications (comparing what to thos fortifications from Pokrovsk to Russian border) after that it is much easier to get to Dniepr river.
@@jackzgb1232 Thank you.
@@stephenvanwoert2447 Welcome
what of the kursk region?
Complete Disaster - 2
Disaster.
An absolute disaster
@@efghggdxlmfn33 how is kursk offensive disaster for Ukraine? They r literally winning there
@@R.sh02 Taking heavy casualties in the open fields.
Ukraine has its best elite soldiers in Kursk and Russia has its best elite soldiers in Pokrovsk. It totally explains what we are seeing on the map.
Первый комент)
How do you get the fortified positions? Do you use commercial sat images? Interesting, and thanks.
Desastre total para a Rússia ou para a Ucrânia?
Para Ucrania
Porque isso ?
Eles continuam avançando em kusck
@@cintielderdoria3947 Because it is a pointless operation that will not bring any substance to UAF and certainly won't impact the disastrous falling apart of Eastern front. UAF are advancing in barely defended areas. RU are advancing in multiple layered defenses, some set up for few years. If you can not use your own brain and pull logical conclusions, you are cooked if you rely on any MSM.
@@cintielderdoria3947 ...and retreating in Ukraine.
@@cintielderdoria3947a stalemate with heavy losses in armour and manpower is hardly something positive for Ukraine.
The hype will die down, but they wont be able to return all of those scrapped vehicles and dead elite soldiers.
Not to mention that they are rapidly losing fortifications in the Donbass, built from 2014, which could threaten city of Dnepr(there is pretty much nothing behind those defence lines in the donbass)
I would save that term to total "special military operation" , all now reported are tactical level minor things..
Simply cannot understand the mindset and moral compass of those cheering on the Russians What deptavity😊
That's because you're Ustaša...
@@robkit6681 Youre on the wrong side of history again not me
Your watching the wrong channel, this is Russian only propaganda
@@DavorGlasnovićEurope is the one with the most disadvantages though.
Pitiful Euroids. Your production capabilities will go to US and China, because production in EU is no longer profitable.
Seems like US and UK are planning to turn the EU into another kamikaze. Something like a big Ukraine.
I didn't knew that Crimea was located via Kursk 😂
Slava Fukraini! Slava Cocaina!
And Slava Bellendski
"The Zelensky Wave" - to be taught at all military academies under "What not to do when you're already fucked".
It´s not a Stryker, its a German Marder IFV,
Please correct and research millitary technology PLEASE
It putss everything you say in doubt when you make such a big mistake on something obvious
Yep, I’m sure the U.S. didn’t give any Stryker Dragoons to Ukraine
Nope, sorry... military experts most of us aren't. The word "geopolitical" commentators better describes many of us.
Very good analysis especially on the use of Ukraine's best unites & equipment being drawn away and being used in Kursk and taking heavy losses in equipment/personnel
Haven’t seen the video yet?? Disaster for who? Russia or Ukraine?? Or clickbait???🤔🤔🤔
Probably click bait
"Units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are being withdrawn from the Donetsk region, leaving entire front lines to their fate. It looks like we are "giving away" the region," DEPUTY Mariana Bezuglaya
According to her, under such circumstances, the loss of Pokrovsk is a matter of the near future, and Toretsk is living out its last days.
"But beyond Pokrovsky there is a direct route to Pavlograd, where there are no fortifications at all, then Dnepropetrovsk. Beyond Toretsk is the Kramatorsk agglomeration, and then the Kharkiv region… No equipment has been made for the administrative border of the Donetsk region," Bezuglaya added.
Watch the video.
@@thewho5786 Don’t want to.!
@@yomeroyomismo8212Then why are you commenting ?
Yep, third year of disaster
Hardly a complete disasterm clickbait.
He meant the war in general
Paul has a weed problem