Chopstick Full-Speed Testing! S30 ready for static fire and Boeing Starliner...SpaceX Weekly #6
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 чер 2024
- Chopstick Full-Speed Testing! S30 ready for static fire and Boeing Starliner...SpaceX Weekly #6
===
00:00 - 06:18: B13, S30, Mechazilla, and tank farm update
06:19 - 08:22: Refueling and SpaceX achievement
08:23 - 11:59: How Starship Refueling
12:00 - 15:07: Starship HLS uncrewed and new Starship versions
15:08 - 19:04: Starship's potential in orbit
19:05 - 21:06: Starship's potential on the Moon
21:07 - 25:01: Starship's potential on Mars
25:02 - 27:56: Boeing Starliner spacesuit
27:57 - 32:14: SpaceX Dragon spacesuit
32:15 - 34:01: Comparison
34:02 - 37:32: Starliner's delay
37:33 - 40:49: Reason of delays
40:50 - 43:46: Starliner’s problem
43:47 - 46:21: Falcon 9's new milestones
46:22 - 48:10: China’s next lunar mission
48:11 - 48:24: Outro
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: smanager339@gmail.com
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
Chopstick Full-Speed Testing! S30 ready for static fire and Boeing Starliner...SpaceX Weekly #6
Exciting times indeed! May promises to be an explosive month for SpaceX and Starship.
Now, let's take a look at recent developments in Starbase.
One of the most captivating activities has been the testing of B13-the hardware designated for Flight 6, slated for launch at the year's end. Flight 6 may mark SpaceX's inaugural attempt at refueling. Following the production phase, B13 has transitioned into the testing phase, akin to other prototypes. Its initial test involved cryogenic testing, a crucial step in assessing its readiness for upcoming missions.
On the morning of April 25, B13 was transported to the Massey test site, where it underwent its inaugural cryogenic test on April 26. This test focused solely on the liquid methane tank.
Chopstick Full-Speed Testing! S30 ready for static fire and Boeing Starliner...SpaceX Weekly #6
During the test, fuel was introduced into the tank, accompanied by venting from storage tanks, resulting in a somewhat obscured view of the proceedings. Following fuel loading, a distinct frost line emerged on a section of the methane tank. Notably, these frost patterns only manifested on approximately half of the tank, indicating that the liquid methane fuel was not entirely loaded during this test.
Chopstick Full-Speed Testing! S30 ready for static fire and Boeing Starliner...SpaceX Weekly #6
Despite this, the test proceeded without incident, validating the methane tank's compliance with standards for storing cryogenic methane fuel at temperatures as low as -180 degrees Celsius or -292 degrees Fahrenheit.
----
We use images and content in accordance with the UA-cam Fair Use copyright guidelines: ua-cam.com/users/intlen/about...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: colonbina25@gmail.com
To be resolved, thank you. - Наука та технологія
![[SCRUB] SpaceX Static Fires Ship 30 in Preparation for the Fifth Starship Flight](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d7Ialipbgw4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[SCRUB] SpaceX Static Fires Ship 30 in Preparation for the Fifth Starship Flight](/img/tr.png)
This long format coverage was great! Thank you
♥️♥️♥️
Anyone else hear the “ah F*ck” At 47:29 😂 that’s how you know he’s real and not an AI text to speech bot lol
Sorry, AI curses realistically now. Also coughs and sniffs occasionally.
Haha, crack myself, lol 🤣🤣🤣
Well done. Thanks Kevin.
♥️♥️♥️
7:45 Glad to see Einstein is following in Starship development too!
Great Episode, Kev. I think the fuel transfer in outer space is going to be pretty exciting. I think the hook up will be the easiest. You don't have the atmospheric conditions to interfere with the hookup of the two ships. Getting both to the same speed should be easy. You've got all the time in the world to make that happen. The transfer in the weightlessness is going to be the most challenging from ship to ship. What actually happens with the fuel in outer space? Does the gaseous fuel mix with the solid fuel?
Moving on. Have they overcome the chopstick arms shaking back and forth and the vibration when they come to a complete stop? I like the amount of time you and your team put into the update of this episode. Great Job Guys.
Do you think the Raptor engines in themselves with be enough to land and takeoff from Mars? Or do you think it will have to a highbred of Raptor and Raptor Vac engines?
On the New NASA space suit. I don't like the idea of zippers. They leak. The more one uses a zipper in that environment. The more likely it will have the tendency to leak. The other thing is. They tend to jam up. If they jam up in a critical situation. You're screwed. As good as the SpaceX suit is. You can bet that SpaceX is in the process of making a better space suit. I rest my case with the EVA suit.
When Boeing restructured an cut costs. They went about it wrong way. They cut a lot of there top engineers that understood the product line. Partnering with Blue Origin may be a mistake. They are still having BE-4 issues. Falls in line with the management. I wouldn't sign a contract with an industry that hasn't proven there Success or Merit. That's like going to a car company that hasn't built a successful drive train. I like Sierra Space.
Again Great Episode.
♥️♥️♥️
@@colonbina1 Thanks, Kev. Have a Great Day!
I am truly happy to hear that you are a normal person using normal language at about 45 minutes into the video. I will be back again
Yah - it's better than AI. You ever hear AI try to say WWII (World War two): "Double you, double you, eye eye" :)
Apollo mission didn't have all these technical challenges .. they got to the moon with 1/3 of the fuel and a fraction of the technology
I mean but in the 1960s they were creating an entire new concept of operations , so more development from scratch and with slide rules and written math. So a simpler design but also less computer simulation. SpaceX is doing it cheaper and faster and more complex because of all prior NASA missions and super computers
Always love these reports, especially love the blooper at about 27.30 🤣😂🤣 Love that you left that in just adds a bit of humor to it Good job.
☺️😂😂
Check 47:27 😂
What blooper at 27:30?
I can't wait for f5. this will be musk's Waterloo. the boom bash crash will be spectacular.
Fun fact, oxygen has a freezing point of -218 Celsius. So unless SpaceX is experimenting with using oxygen as a solid rocket fuel source, -270 Celsius is the wrong temperature. I think you mixed it up with liquid hydrogen, whose boiling point is slightly above zero kelvin
Correct. Oxygen liquifies @ -183 degrees Celsius and freezes at -218.79 degrees Celsius. Good catch!
I thought it sounded low since we know what absolute zero is
Baloney. All such figures assume certain parameters like atmospheric pressure. Change those parameters and the other figures like freezing point changes, too.
@@tonysu8860 Are you suggesting that the video is correct that SpaceX is chilling the liquid O2 to -270C???
Jeez, if they are relying on a pressure driven transfer then they are only getting half the prpoellant to transfer as the tank pressures equalise. They need pumps to handle the flow. It'll be really interesting to see how SpaceX will handle fluids whilst in free fall.
I always suspected there may have been a little AI here but seemingly it’s a real human BUT I really have no clue what nationality. Very comfortable and clear voice though! Keep it up.
Most likely Asian. There’s detectable accent of Asian, possibly Chinese language.
"If it's Boeing I'm not going"
About time to see the black hole. Ostrage head in the sand some one has to bring up the rear Boieng its great we can speak openly about time it will take a joint effort on all that dairs to go where no man has gone
The SpaceX standard Dragon flight suits HAVE NEVER BEEN TESTED IN ACTUAL FLIGHT! That is because a Dragon capsule has never been depressurized with crew on board. So don't tell us how they are the penultimate in space suits until they pass that test.
Obviously Isaacman and SpaceX don't think the flight suits aren't up to the task working in a serious vacuum since they have created the EVA suit. You say that the EVA suit does not need an umbilical cord nor bulky backpack. So I hope Isaacman has been doing deep breathing exercises so he doesn't need the umbilical cord you just eliminated from his upcoming space walk. Good luck Jared!
3-2-1 boom
Pray tell us what happens after the fuel pressure becomes equal in the Starship target and chaser. How will the remaining fuel be transferred? Also how many chasers are required to refuel a target? Would the pressure method still be feasible for multiple chasers?
I think this particular video is an excellent example of the girth and momentum of this gigantic undertaking. The best I have seen, it's an epiphany to me.
Just had an idea I'm wondering if SpaceX put 4 extra tanks on the outside of the main rocket it be like fighter Jets have excep there will be 4 fuel tanks.
Propellant slosh - I know F1 cars have a mesh in their fuel tanks. That mesh is primarily meant to be a safety adaptation; that way if the fuel tank has a split in it then the fuel comes out slower so that you do no get a huge fireball. But it would also cut down on slosh quite a bit. Maybe the bottom third of each Starship fuel tank would have this mesh in it? Too much weight?
question, I thought methane was found on a moon aroundb Saturn or Jupiter. why not mine it in space?
What if Space X aborts a planned catch due to catch landing control issues. The booster and/or starship would land in the Gulf of Mexico off Starbase. Would that be considered a event by the FAA. I assume Space X will reserves a designated splash area in the gulf for that as an alternative landing zone.
Flight Four probably will happen May 20th to May 28th.
Great commentry and info. Congrats , must take a lot of effort to produce. Ps: I love the rough editing, with words repeated and a fu#k in there too. Makes it more human. 😅
Thanks for your comment. We'll try harder to make better video, so keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️
Musk's Way Proved Itself.I'm reserved about refueling orbit.The option refueling tank along with the fuel thing should be taken,as an option.Leaving loaded tanks (only) in orbit would open up new possibilities Including for other systems.(Lego systems inqluding for engines)Gas station on Orbit.(and station-ships with gravyti)-Star system.
My opinion.
❤😂🎉
SPACE X 👍🚀💯
🚀🚀🚀
I guess I missed the chopstick test. Did he ever c over it?
Anyone else catch the "f###" at 47:29? 🤣
yo ia vice how you doing???????
no one is answering that when the spacex lands on the moon how will it take of the moon
We will need a separate episode to discuss this
With a PTOOOEEE VROOOOMMM duh. :)
Nie ma tłumaczenie napisy po polsku,
Please don't say explosive.😮😮😮😮
shame they can't show the video at normal speed to reflect what 'full speed' testing really looks like. It's obvious the video shown is speeded up. vapour clouds etc.
The cryogenic tests are not performed using methane and oxygen, they use liquid nitrogen for both tanks. Also, the fuel transfer to the tanker ship in orbit will have to be performed several times before a ship can proceed to the Moon or Mars. This video fails to mention this and implies one transfer is all that is needed.
Thanks for your great contribution. Keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️
I don't see proper structural changes in Starship's shape. It makes me sure that Musk's team can't understand what happened during the last test with the Starship. Future fly will repeat the same faulty behavior of the Starship as we previously observed. Lack of imagination, not for the first time: I predicted that the launchpad was faulty and now, after one year, they change it to NASA designed launchpad. Better later than never!
It is about engine, not the shape of the vehicle
Many don't understand that in space NOTHING is sitting still; nothing is motionless. We orbit our planet....which orbits the sun....which orbits in the Milky Way....which is constantly expanding. ALL of this motion must be taken into account when connecting two bodies in space, constantly moving at thousands of miles per hour, although it APPEARS to be stationary.
What number is too many satellites around the earth before they interfere with rockets leaving earths orbit. I don't know but the numbers in this video is frighteningly too much imo.
Why not park a number of freighters in orbit around Earth with just enough fuel to land on Mars then use a tractor rocket to tow the freighters to Mars where then each freighter would detach and land on Mars.
i asked Elon for a job....use a hourglass instead of more baffling and add pressure before booster cutoff.
those astronauts will retire before boeing gets there shit together no doubt its cost plus aholes
I would say tell Boeing to get there rocket Capsule off of NASA property and they need to be made to pay all of the over runs they have had and also if they want any kind of contract in the future they build them on there own property and if there is and kinda of delays they will be find 200,000 dollars a day. And also NASA has the right to fire any Boeing employees at any time.
Once again: the idea of refuelling propellant and fuel is dumb. It comes from airplanes refuelling systems, used in different conditions on Earth. In space ready to use containers with fuel and oxidant waiting for starship would be more practical and safer. They can't use this method with airplanes, but in space it would be much more efficient way to fuel the starship. Ready to use, full containers should wait in space, on proper orbit, for Starship, and should be attached to the starship's body, as it happens when capsules are attached to ISS. Later these containers could be relocated to the Moon surface, and transform into part of Moon city. There is lot of experience with space docking, method eliminates problems with accidental ignition of oxidant (even stainless steel burns in proper conditions) and takes much less time, if many tanks would be joined to the starship's body. Simply instead of two starships docking together in space, it would be a few containers (tanks) joined to one starship. No loss of fuel during refuelling, some simple, automated procedure. Probably it could be automated with use of crane similar to space shuttle's crane, also used on ISS, or automated as docking to ISS.
Kaku is a hack
no way i am first again
You’re not, but your boyfriend still loves you.
Thanks for your great support 🏅
Not another taxpayer penny to Boeing
great content
Bot comment: 40 minute video, released 7 minutes ago, and you commented 5 minutes before this reply.
Get e f'd
@@DxBlack i watch all the content and never took my time to show that so i comented so chill
Thanks all your supports
What's the point n going to the moon again what a waste of money 💰🤑
It's pretty simple. Before we can put humans on Mars we need to make sure we can have humans living on the moon. If we cannot get human safely to live on the moon then there's no way we'll ever get them to Mars. They're using the moon as a testing ground for the trip to Mars. That's been stated numerous times.
And the point of going to mars is even more pointless!
Loading is nitrogen only so stop talking about methane and oxygen
These are getting repetitive. 🤔
stop wasting your time and fuel on tests. just send a ship to the moon berfore someone else gets there first.
Kevin, your AI voice is really annoying. At times. I won't watch or listen to Great SpaceX because of it. It's too bad that the algorithm's don't register the dislike because of your voice.
What wrong about this? We will try to fix that
Well don't Karen. Bye.....
You can tell that it's not AI by his occasional screw up and the word F&%K not getting edited out when he does screw up. Editing is a very intense process sometimes if you get tongue tied every now and then reading your own script. Maybe AI assisted... Keep up the good work Kevin, I know it's a hard job.
@@picklesontheroad Sorry, but I think you are totally wrong. Kevin's voice inflection and use of inappropriate adjectives is beyond the pale. Kevin is as phoney as a $3 bill.
@@doncogswell9596 It's all good. AI or not I really don't care. I'm here for the info and entertainment of it... every now and then the entertainment out weighs the info.
177 views in 10 minutes bro fell off
waste of money !!!!!!!
If you think it’s a waste of money, don’t comment.
177 views in 10 minutes bro fell off
Are you 12?