Sir you explained well but one thing should not be said in the video that Ramayan and Mahabharat are myths by the people. They are not myths, they are truth. Thank you...
It was criticised on the basis that indian nationalist movement are on the basis pf bourgeois classes to complete their self interest amd even peasent etc are those in this movement they are also bourgeis clases
R p datta today 1847 says about that this nationalist movement take by the bourgeoisis classes rather than these classes proteletraits due to which the interest of capitalist classes remain successful . Even the creation of the Indian National Congress created by the colonial for their self interest of the Britishers .
Namaste sir,first of all congratulations in advance for 100k family ❤️, secondly sir can you make a video on CUET-PG 2023 preparation strategy?if you are able to,we will be highly thankful.
Thank you so much sir aap iss hi tarah political sc hons k Sara syllabus complete kra dijiye jald se jald . Sir dsc ke teeno subjects cover kra dijiye Kyuki (Feb ) end se paper start h .
A r desai tell about some phases of national movement which included 1885 till phase by the educated elite ,secondly by the 1885 to 1905 by the lal bal pal bourgeosis classes ,1905 to 1918 by the lower middle class and 1918 to 1939 by the peasent ,industrailust etc because they realised that nothing will happens from that because these are not understabd our demands .
After that it started assuming that the subalterns people are those which against the colonial rule there and against Europeans and many people wrote about the subalterns people .
@@POLSCHELP marxist or nationalists approach towards nationalism isme Marxists or nationalists dono pucha ja rha hai or probable question mai bhi dono pucha ja rha hai to paper mai sath mai pucha jayega ya nationalists approach alg or Marxist alg question bnega?
Sub alterns are those people which called as tribes , proletraits and middle class people .and even those elites people also which are native of India against Britishers . It says about the elite people movement are legaltics , Pacific and controlled on the other hand subalterns people are more spontaneous and really violent .
Pros and cons of marxist approaches pn colonialism and nationalist .. It shows people to the economic aspect behind the nationalist movement . Due to which those countries which became independent from the colonial movement did not enfireces capitalist system . Influence colonial movement and sub alters . Cons It only focused on the economic aspect not ideas , culture etc . It reject the whole leadership of the Indian National movement people . Completely break from the past and according to them Indian National movement is only for the interest of the bourgeoisis classes which do capitalist development .
Marxism approchrs says that nayionalist are the capitalist people and national movemsnt against the imperalist which is of the capitalist nature and gandhi use of non violemce to protect the interest of the bourgeoisis classes because proteletraits classes started violence against them .and these people who do violence even also come from the bourgeiosis classes so how they can go again their interest and how they can understand the dukh of the proletraits classes .and another thing is that it did not support the violence because if violence happens like chauri chaura etc which creared lot of problems like violence problems etc if these people do violence like that .
Subalterns perspective history according to them they created their own history by imagination like Gandhi as Mahatma that there shrap can do bad for the Britishers even some people says ramayana and Mahabharat are also myth these are created story .
Thank you sir for providing helpful lectures but please make more lectures because exam is coming soon
Appreciate your work sir.
You have gave a clear thought about all the approaches.
Very helpful videos, thank you soo much sir ❤
Sir you explained well but one thing should not be said in the video that Ramayan and Mahabharat are myths by the people. They are not myths, they are truth.
Thank you...
I really appreciate your effort..thank you sir
Ramayana and Mahabharat is not a myth.
U r right. It was a story. With morals and values to teach .
Thank you god and sir
Give me your blessings bhahwaan ji ❤❤
Sir please make a video on Hindu nationalism , once again a big thank your video's are very helpful.
Thank you sir ....very nice explaination
❤😊 thank you so much sir 🙏☺️
Thank you so much sir 🙏👍
Sir very helpful thankyou
well explained video.
It was criticised on the basis that indian nationalist movement are on the basis pf bourgeois classes to complete their self interest amd even peasent etc are those in this movement they are also bourgeis clases
Pls sir 🙏 ko apne concept diye hue h ussi se explain kre,smj nei aata ky k bolta h nd likha hua concept kaha k
Right
Sir aap D.A.V College mein padhte hain na??
R p datta today 1847 says about that this nationalist movement take by the bourgeoisis classes rather than these classes proteletraits due to which the interest of capitalist classes remain successful . Even the creation of the Indian National Congress created by the colonial for their self interest of the Britishers .
Namaste sir,first of all congratulations in advance for 100k family ❤️, secondly sir can you make a video on CUET-PG 2023 preparation strategy?if you are able to,we will be highly thankful.
thx...Will try
Thank you so much sir aap iss hi tarah political sc hons k Sara syllabus complete kra dijiye jald se jald .
Sir dsc ke teeno subjects cover kra dijiye
Kyuki (Feb ) end se paper start h .
trying
Sir plzz CNI ka pdf available krwa dijiye...🙏 CNI ka pdf nhi mil rha...
wait...will
@@POLSCHELP plzz sir🙏🙏
Thank you
Thanks a lot sir🥰🥰
Sir please make a video on state in comparative sense: i am not getting any material on this
Ppt or pdf is not download By given your link.
Sir please upload pdf of it on your website. @polscihelp
A r desai tell about some phases of national movement which included 1885 till phase by the educated elite ,secondly by the 1885 to 1905 by the lal bal pal bourgeosis classes ,1905 to 1918 by the lower middle class and 1918 to 1939 by the peasent ,industrailust etc because they realised that nothing will happens from that because these are not understabd our demands .
After that it started assuming that the subalterns people are those which against the colonial rule there and against Europeans and many people wrote about the subalterns people .
Sir plz make a vedio for pg poltical science entrance exam
Sir alag alag to nhi puchenge na approaches ko?
Watch the probable question video
@@POLSCHELP probable question mai 2 ka ek sath do pucha guya hai to sir ek sath do hi pucha jayega.?
@@neha5250 ??
@@POLSCHELP marxist or nationalists approach towards nationalism isme Marxists or nationalists dono pucha ja rha hai or probable question mai bhi dono pucha ja rha hai to paper mai sath mai pucha jayega ya nationalists approach alg or Marxist alg question bnega?
@@neha5250 marxist may be asked with post-colonial
39:46 Ramayan & Mahabharat is not myth
Sub alterns are those people which called as tribes , proletraits and middle class people .and even those elites people also which are native of India against Britishers .
It says about the elite people movement are legaltics , Pacific and controlled on the other hand subalterns people are more spontaneous and really violent .
Sir can you make a video on idealism
Thanks 😊
Sir please share the pdf
Sir aise hi pura DSC 3 COMP. KARA DO 20 FEB TK...
Will try
Sir plz post colonial theory ko discussi kar djye.... Plz 🙏 sir
Pros and cons of marxist approaches pn colonialism and nationalist ..
It shows people to the economic aspect behind the nationalist movement .
Due to which those countries which became independent from the colonial movement did not enfireces capitalist system .
Influence colonial movement and sub alters .
Cons
It only focused on the economic aspect not ideas , culture etc .
It reject the whole leadership of the Indian National movement people .
Completely break from the past and according to them Indian National movement is only for the interest of the bourgeoisis classes which do capitalist development .
Dino james teaching pol sci??
First viewer ✌️🎓
Ye lo medal 🏅
@@brajwasin5024 thanks & love...!!
Jalo mat yrr
@@ananjaypandey1039 jalne ki kya baat h isme😂😂😂hddd h
@@brajwasin5024 fir to bahut achhi baat hai...!! Love mate😍
Marxism approchrs says that nayionalist are the capitalist people and national movemsnt against the imperalist which is of the capitalist nature and gandhi use of non violemce to protect the interest of the bourgeoisis classes because proteletraits classes started violence against them .and these people who do violence even also come from the bourgeiosis classes so how they can go again their interest and how they can understand the dukh of the proletraits classes .and another thing is that it did not support the violence because if violence happens like chauri chaura etc which creared lot of problems like violence problems etc if these people do violence like that .
Subalterns perspective history according to them they created their own history by imagination like Gandhi as Mahatma that there shrap can do bad for the Britishers even some people says ramayana and Mahabharat are also myth these are created story .