Umari Question on shia hadees books | Answer By Hassan Allahyari | shia muhadessena | shia vs sunni
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 січ 2023
- To Support Allahyari:
abtv.org/en/?page_id=639
paypal.me/ABTV
/ allahyari
bit.ly/3bX6VJs
For Further Information On How To Donate Email: paypal@abtv.org
Hassan Allahyari Direct Contact Information:
info@abtv.org
wa.me/+19177832536
To Schedule a Call During Live Show Please Contact:
Brother Jafar Ali Kazmi: Operators Available
wa.me/+17187101138
Short Clips Channel: / @allahyariclips
Umari Question on shia hadees books | Answer By Hassan Allahyari | shia muhadessena | shia vs sunni
I m suni but this Hassan Allahyari is most perfect researcher in all over the world God bless u sir
mashalah bhai bohot duaen apky lye . Bohot acha laga apka suni hona or haq ko haq smjhna . Allah hum sab ko raah e mustakeem par chalny ki tofeeq ata kry
He is fluent in multiple languages therefore he reads it for everybody out of these books without having an usool or any adherence to ilm e rijal . Yes theres khurafat in our books and your books but that doesnt make it deen . Deen will need a sanad . Sulaym ibne qais’ book is of no value and imam khoie himself has refuted this theology. Try looking at islah tv . They have valid understandings on display for momineen to ponder .
This is a story about a truth seeker. He took rather quite a difficult route in his quest for knowledge by visiting in person to eminent and known scholars of all faiths. Not many get the opportunity or the desire to choose to take that route, but he accepted this challenge for himself and undertook it with a smile on his face and emanating best behavior at all times. It is very time consuming and difficult just to plan it out indeed as many would agree.
He was honest in his search and quest for knowledge and thus paid visit to scholars of all major faiths in person to hear them one-to-one and face-to-face. He continued visiting promptly and regularly. Aptly pounding and bombarding at them all possible thorny and controversial questions out there in the domain of comparative religions he sought to identify and discover as to how their faith uniquely identified them.
He believed in the purity and sanctity of the Sahaba (RTA) with all his heart and blood which was totally reasonable and fine. But when he searched deeper and deeper, peeling off the layers from the onion he started to question, in the inners of his heart, wondering, if all the companions were indeed virtuous, then why in the prestigious books of his sect there were to be found events and behaviors (WITH proper verified ASNAAD) of some companions that were contrary to the truest Islamic teachings as taught by the Prophet PBUH himself.
Initially, he simply could not believe his eyes. He would often rub his eyes and then open them wide with bewilderment. At times he even pinched himself to make sure he was not dreaming. He made his habit to remain awake at night to read and re-read, analyze and re-analyze, scrutinize and re-scrutinize if all he was reading was indeed true!. How he wished so hard it were not true!
He kept wishing hard for days and crossed his fingers that it was all untrue. But every time he flipped-open the most authentic and known books of his sect, those traditions of not-so-good behavior by some of the companions were right there in black ink staring at him. He had indeed been aware already of many good-behavior traditions about them for which he felt proud, but the bad behavior by the same ones were there too. Why were they there? He got confused! It must have dawned at his brains many times, that, while in an argument or discussion with the opposition, hopefully, somehow these not-so-good behavior traditions never came up. He won a few debates and arguments with the opposition indeed, but, he knew in his heart of hearts, that, if indeed he mentioned the not-so-good behavior traditions of some of the companions of The Holy Prophet PBUH honestly, then it would be extremely hard to win a debate or a MUNAZARA or any argument of any kind against the most opposing sect. There was simply no defense for that. One was helpless to defend, approve, or validate that kind of behavior against the Holy Prophet PBUH.
Upon being so disturbed and perturbed, he simply could not sit at home and decided to begin visiting people of his sects at first and have friendly conversations with them about this thorn of thorns i.e., about the not-so-good behavior of the selected companions of the Holy Prophet PBUH. It seems probable he was told to ignore those traditions or that the ASNAAD ( chain of narrators ) was weak for those not-so-good behavior traditions. But from a very young age he had always been a very keen person and an enthusiast when it came to finding the true original and correct source of all matters pertaining to traditions as well as the chain of narrators. On his own territory at home, with ample time at his disposal , he double-checked, triple checked, and quadruple-checked the source as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the chain of narrators. And he performed this ritual at several different occasions on different days over many years.
There thus remained immersed for a long time, in the back of his mind, subconsciously, the pinching thought that why when a person who has talked or acted negatively-on-purpose all the while knowing that it was wrong and contrary to the teachings of our Holy Prophet PBUH, is that person ( the companion ) still regarded high and esteemed in position. If he really committed non-Islamic acts of speech or action that were not part of Islam rather against its teachings, then why uphold him among the most elevated and superior at all? This really deeply and painfully troubled him. The most problematic part was that it was all written in black and white in the verified and validated traditions of his sect of Islam. He really wished it was not there. But it was all there. He then, finally, after a continuous battle with his soul started to feel bad for himself. Because he knew that praising a person when he or she deliberately performed negative sayings and acts that were present right there in his books and that too with the most authentic chain of narrators was really tough to live with as a truth seeker. This acceptance of the non-so-good behavior of some of the companions then turned into a nightmare for him. He could not swallow that reality. It became stuck in his throat
He then turned to start looking into the lives of the Ahlul Bayt AS. And there he found the names of those personalities that were respected and revered in all sects of Islam. There were good things written about them. And if he found any wrongdoing, he wondered if that were true. He argued with himself further that if indeed their misdeeds were true then it was just The Prophet PBUHAHP, the only being who was ever virtuous and others from his closest family through his blood failed time and again and submitted to worldly affairs as well as committed errors even though they were from his purest blood as well as spent maximum time with The Prophet PBUH himself in his house after his PBUH's marriage with his PBUH's first wife Hazrat Khadija SA.
He wondered in solitude, that, if such close proximity to The Prophet PBUH, and teachings by him all the time, by virtue of living with him continuously for so many years, cannot make a person free of all worldly errors and misjudgments, then what will. Also, his daughter who was made the Queen of heavens for all women folk made errors of judgement as per the traditions in the books of his sect. She remained with The Prophet PBUH, was from him PBUH, learned from him PBUH every single minute in his PBUH's house till her marriage, yet was prone to mistakes, and most especially after The Prophet PUBH's demise when she made a grave error or probably lied about claiming a property that did not belong to her.
This is what she learned from the highest being ever (PBUH) to grace the heavens and the earth, the CAPTAIN of every creature created with power to move heavens and earth with the tip of his holy finger. She remained with the Prophet PBUH till her marriage and all she learned was to claim a thing which did not belong to her right after the Prophet's PBUH demise for which she went in person to claim in the court of the Caliph of the time.
Since the subject of our story, this truth seeker, craved for a genuine win against those who contested with him about the piety and legitimacy of supremacy of companions of The Holy Prophet PBUH, and not a fake win, he started to lose charm of all his wins. He wanted to win by mentioning everything, hiding nothing, and then prove his point with a bang. But he became exhausted and tired in thinking for months how in the world could he possibly prove his point ( and win a debate ) when the not-so-good behavior traditions of some of the companions (Sahaba) of the Holy Prophet PBUH were there in the most authentic books of his sect. If these traditions were in the books of the opposing sect or sects only, then, it would have been an absolutely great thing for him as opposing parties are generally doubted ( and alleged/accused of writing false on-purpose ) to smear the honorable personalities of other party or parties. He did know the opposing party did have those not-so-good behavior traditions in the books of their sect and brought those traditions right away in a matter of seconds as a hardcore proof at every argument, debate, or MUNAZARA against his sect. But having the exact traditions ( or similar to them ) in his own sect were just a hands down loss. And he could not win any argument this way at all ever if he spoke about all those not-so-good behavior traditions about some of the companions. This was an extreme disappointment, which he thought about often for many years to have those not-so-good traditions in the sect he was born in. And he absolutely hated and detested that. He really hated why he was born in a sect that had not-so-good behavior traditions of those personalities since it was those exact personalities who were placed in the highest and top-most hierarchy of leaders from where he took the basics of what Islam was.
And finally after many years of meditating over the subject the truth seeker had a change of heart.
@@Mohammad.A96 you have no evidence for what you said run away from your religion with ilm al rijal because you’re followers of the original runner Umar but unlike you we follow our books and we don’t run from our religion everything in them is true
@@ShiaRafidhiAkhbariIslam Have you even seen shia books other than nahjul balagha and kaafi yourself ? The liar here must be yourself . Shaiykh tusi has written a whole series to settle the differences in the ahadith collected by the shia community since he says himself that people are disbelieving in the shia madhab due to the enormous differences amongst the quotes of aima ahlul bayt . Go open imam majlisi book only to find out that yall cant even prove the birth of 12th imam .
Imam khoie has published fatwas disregarding sulaym bin qays book yet your zakireen tend to only quote this untrue book not just that but hes refuted the idea of taking a riwayat as an aqeeda if it comes from one or two asnad which in turn refutes the birth of 12th imam. Brother worry about what you have been told to believe since this isnt the deen of Rasoolallah .
The first one to start matam was muawiya bin abu sufyan in shaam and he used to bring about uthmans bloody shirt to heighten the emotions of muslims under his rule . Who follows the sunnah of matam today ? Who follows the sunnah of tabara on the sahaba today which was also started by muawiya . Brother worry what school you have adopted since this shiasm that is brought about by rawafiz like allahyari is not very old and has fabricated originals.
Absolutely world class response by Allahyari Sahab.
بہت عمدہ جواب دیا اللہیاری نے، جزاک اللہ
Mola Qaim A.s
Apko haq pohchane ki mazeed tofeeq ata farmaaae
This is a story about a truth seeker. He took rather quite a difficult route in his quest for knowledge by visiting in person to eminent and known scholars of all faiths. Not many get the opportunity or the desire to choose to take that route, but he accepted this challenge for himself and undertook it with a smile on his face and emanating best behavior at all times. It is very time consuming and difficult just to plan it out indeed as many would agree.
He was honest in his search and quest for knowledge and thus paid visit to scholars of all major faiths in person to hear them one-to-one and face-to-face. He continued visiting promptly and regularly. Aptly pounding and bombarding at them all possible thorny and controversial questions out there in the domain of comparative religions he sought to identify and discover as to how their faith uniquely identified them.
He believed in the purity and sanctity of the Sahaba (RTA) with all his heart and blood which was totally reasonable and fine. But when he searched deeper and deeper, peeling off the layers from the onion he started to question, in the inners of his heart, wondering, if all the companions were indeed virtuous, then why in the prestigious books of his sect there were to be found events and behaviors (WITH proper verified ASNAAD) of some companions that were contrary to the truest Islamic teachings as taught by the Prophet PBUH himself.
Initially, he simply could not believe his eyes. He would often rub his eyes and then open them wide with bewilderment. At times he even pinched himself to make sure he was not dreaming. He made his habit to remain awake at night to read and re-read, analyze and re-analyze, scrutinize and re-scrutinize if all he was reading was indeed true!. How he wished so hard it were not true!
He kept wishing hard for days and crossed his fingers that it was all untrue. But every time he flipped-open the most authentic and known books of his sect, those traditions of not-so-good behavior by some of the companions were right there in black ink staring at him. He had indeed been aware already of many good-behavior traditions about them for which he felt proud, but the bad behavior by the same ones were there too. Why were they there? He got confused! It must have dawned at his brains many times, that, while in an argument or discussion with the opposition, hopefully, somehow these not-so-good behavior traditions never came up. He won a few debates and arguments with the opposition indeed, but, he knew in his heart of hearts, that, if indeed he mentioned the not-so-good behavior traditions of some of the companions of The Holy Prophet PBUH honestly, then it would be extremely hard to win a debate or a MUNAZARA or any argument of any kind against the most opposing sect. There was simply no defense for that. One was helpless to defend, approve, or validate that kind of behavior against the Holy Prophet PBUH.
Upon being so disturbed and perturbed, he simply could not sit at home and decided to begin visiting people of his sects at first and have friendly conversations with them about this thorn of thorns i.e., about the not-so-good behavior of the selected companions of the Holy Prophet PBUH. It seems probable he was told to ignore those traditions or that the ASNAAD ( chain of narrators ) was weak for those not-so-good behavior traditions. But from a very young age he had always been a very keen person and an enthusiast when it came to finding the true original and correct source of all matters pertaining to traditions as well as the chain of narrators. On his own territory at home, with ample time at his disposal , he double-checked, triple checked, and quadruple-checked the source as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the chain of narrators. And he performed this ritual at several different occasions on different days over many years.
There thus remained immersed for a long time, in the back of his mind, subconsciously, the pinching thought that why when a person who has talked or acted negatively-on-purpose all the while knowing that it was wrong and contrary to the teachings of our Holy Prophet PBUH, is that person ( the companion ) still regarded high and esteemed in position. If he really committed non-Islamic acts of speech or action that were not part of Islam rather against its teachings, then why uphold him among the most elevated and superior at all? This really deeply and painfully troubled him. The most problematic part was that it was all written in black and white in the verified and validated traditions of his sect of Islam. He really wished it was not there. But it was all there. He then, finally, after a continuous battle with his soul started to feel bad for himself. Because he knew that praising a person when he or she deliberately performed negative sayings and acts that were present right there in his books and that too with the most authentic chain of narrators was really tough to live with as a truth seeker. This acceptance of the non-so-good behavior of some of the companions then turned into a nightmare for him. He could not swallow that reality. It became stuck in his throat
He then turned to start looking into the lives of the Ahlul Bayt AS. And there he found the names of those personalities that were respected and revered in all sects of Islam. There were good things written about them. And if he found any wrongdoing, he wondered if that were true. He argued with himself further that if indeed their misdeeds were true then it was just The Prophet PBUHAHP, the only being who was ever virtuous and others from his closest family through his blood failed time and again and submitted to worldly affairs as well as committed errors even though they were from his purest blood as well as spent maximum time with The Prophet PBUH himself in his house after his PBUH's marriage with his PBUH's first wife Hazrat Khadija SA.
He wondered in solitude, that, if such close proximity to The Prophet PBUH, and teachings by him all the time, by virtue of living with him continuously for so many years, cannot make a person free of all worldly errors and misjudgments, then what will. Also, his daughter who was made the Queen of heavens for all women folk made errors of judgement as per the traditions in the books of his sect. She remained with The Prophet PBUH, was from him PBUH, learned from him PBUH every single minute in his PBUH's house till her marriage, yet was prone to mistakes, and most especially after The Prophet PUBH's demise when she made a grave error or probably lied about claiming a property that did not belong to her.
This is what she learned from the highest being ever (PBUH) to grace the heavens and the earth, the CAPTAIN of every creature created with power to move heavens and earth with the tip of his holy finger. She remained with the Prophet PBUH till her marriage and all she learned was to claim a thing which did not belong to her right after the Prophet's PBUH demise for which she went in person to claim in the court of the Caliph of the time.
Since the subject of our story, this truth seeker, craved for a genuine win against those who contested with him about the piety and legitimacy of supremacy of companions of The Holy Prophet PBUH, and not a fake win, he started to lose charm of all his wins. He wanted to win by mentioning everything, hiding nothing, and then prove his point with a bang. But he became exhausted and tired in thinking for months how in the world could he possibly prove his point ( and win a debate ) when the not-so-good behavior traditions of some of the companions (Sahaba) of the Holy Prophet PBUH were there in the most authentic books of his sect. If these traditions were in the books of the opposing sect or sects only, then, it would have been an absolutely great thing for him as opposing parties are generally doubted ( and alleged/accused of writing false on-purpose ) to smear the honorable personalities of other party or parties. He did know the opposing party did have those not-so-good behavior traditions in the books of their sect and brought those traditions right away in a matter of seconds as a hardcore proof at every argument, debate, or MUNAZARA against his sect. But having the exact traditions ( or similar to them ) in his own sect were just a hands down loss. And he could not win any argument this way at all ever if he spoke about all those not-so-good behavior traditions about some of the companions. This was an extreme disappointment, which he thought about often for many years to have those not-so-good traditions in the sect he was born in. And he absolutely hated and detested that. He really hated why he was born in a sect that had not-so-good behavior traditions of those personalities since it was those exact personalities who were placed in the highest and top-most hierarchy of leaders from where he took the basics of what Islam was.
And finally after many years of meditating over the subject the truth seeker had a change of heart.
You read the entire letter and proved the point beautifully.
♥️❤️Moula App ko Salamat rakhe Hassan Allahyari Sab ❤️♥️
Hassan Allahyari is very good provided answered. Mola Ap ko Slamat Rakhey Ameen.
Looking at this day and age when Dearest Hassan Allahyari Sahab has led a marvelous defense and offense like the historic Islamic warrior or shall we knight him by calling him a Knight, we notice how far he has amazingly come. Similarly, his evolution of bringing proofs upon proofs is truly commendable. One of the major driving forces behind this is his immeasurable love for the Prophet of Islam PBUHAHP and his progeny. It makes you think about the wonder of how he has challenged the scholars of this era openly and how he is proving to be a boon in the lives of all Muslims both Shia, Sunni and others, even non-muslims. Most importantly, he has recorded a great number of lectures on his website which all seekers of truest knowledge can go to and listen to at their leisure and must ponder over in solitude. All the advancements that he has made in his popularity, which is by no means is his aim, is through the original Arabic sources and books of the opposing parties that he quotes at every opportunity. It won’t be wrong to say that he has now created a storm, a tsunami if you will, and if once, a seeker of knowledge gets to listen to his lectures and/or his youtube sessions with scholars of opposing sects, he or she is bound to be glued to watch him over and over again. His presence on youtube comes with its own set of advantages for truest seekers of the absolute truth about Islam and its teachings and disadvantages for all the opposing sects who are in deep waters now wondering how the people they have revered and looked up for so long over the centuries could possibly hold ill-feelings about the Ahlul Bayt. But it happens to be in their most prestigious books and that too with the righteous chain of narrators according to them so there is really not much room for them to argue. It is amazing that once they do find out they seem very disturbed and perturbed. I guess anyone in that situation is bound to be in extreme discomfort. Allahyari Sahab's mastery over Arabic and Persian in translating things as and when he reads them in sync is a treat to watch. I guess for a person who has challenged scholars of his time, young and old, from all sects including Shiism, if once a caller is answered adequately, the listener must then stop the argument and say goodbye. Asking unnecessary details and restating and repeating the question with contrary to intelligence shade of meanings makes the integrity of the caller weaker by the minute. And then it becomes a matter of personal pride and integrity in proving his or her intelligence as the caller knows the entire Internet audience is watching and listening whenever this particular video session is seen, they will be introduced to the world too. If it were up to me, I would recommend only people with a mastery of Arabic and knowledge of all the most eminent books in Shia and Sunni Islam to bother to make a call to argue at all with Hassan Allahyari Sahab. Those who are not knowledgeable can call and ask non-arguable questions, but if they want to argue they must be adequately knowledgeable about the fact. Hassan Allhyari Sahab responds with a couple of proofs to certain queries. But those who listen to his lectures know that for certain queries he has an abundance of references which he cannot show in the limited time. To many queries in a particular video session we have seen that he has responded through a particular set of authentic narrations but in his many other lectures we have seen yet many more additional sets of authentic narrations he has quoted at those times which he did not or could not mention, due to shortage of time probably, in this particular session of queries. If he brings all the existing narrative evidence from all books then each question's answer will take half hour or so if not longer. I advise and highly recommend all callers to first visit his website where he has recorded a ton of lectures for all to watch. If after watching and then subsequently double and triple checking on their end through books and sources in their own sect that he mentioned, one comes up with a set of queries about a particular topic, only then take the time out to call him in person. Most of what people ask has already been answered in his video lectures on his website. And remember he spares no one, not even Shias.
Thankyou Hassan Allahyari Sahab for providing us the greatest wealth in explaining the truest teachings of Islam.
Is there anybody else out there to counter this scholar who shows and justifies everything through authentic Arabic sources.
Everybody who comes to Allahyari Sahab's channel must think of one thing deeply with mind and heart. He is out there to set things straight only through references and sources. No personal opinions matter. Even people who may seemingly sound very formal and scholarly will have an extremely hard time conversing with him if they are not backing up their argument with solid original authentic sources. All Allahyari Sahab asks for are sources, and if the caller doesn’t have them then its just a waste of the most precious time of Allahyari Sahab. Please be aware that he has challenged all the eminent scholars of a religion that has 1.97 billion or so followers, so he has to deal with people who absolutely genuinely call him for guidance on original traditions about the family of the Prophet SAWW and his SAWW's Sahaba. If people are taken by the biggest surprise of their entire religious lives that certain Sahaba acted in an oddly way, then, nothing can be changed. Its all in original Arabic sources. Its all in black ink. And cannot be denied even by the most honored, civilized, scholarly or highest in official ranking individual of any cast, creed, or religion of any nation. Its just there. When Shias and Sunnis read these, when Allahyari Sahab is showing all the original sources, very uncomfortable feelings are bound to happen. But what can Allahyari Sahab do, when these original sources of books contain just exactly those things that people don’t want to hear and believe.
This response by Allahyari Sahab cannot be contested! What can one possibly reply! All Shias and Sunnis are in deepest trouble, Shias know why and Sunnis too. Is there anyone out there amongst millions of Muslims who could furnish an adequate reply to Allahyari Sahab that listeners and viewers like us could think about. My Lord, every single topic has been defended by him and there is just no one in plain sight for miles to confront him. He has challenged millions and no one stands a chance. What has the Ummah been busy with that not a single soul could respond in a manner that we viewers could look up to. Hundreds of videos have been watched and due to his mastery over Arabic and exhausting research in original sources Allahyari Sahab roars like a Lion or soars like an Eagle in all of them. That is no easy feat, although certainly that is not his motive. His love for the Prophet SAWW is evident in all his lectures and video sessions.
Love you my Indian friend! Allahyari Sahab is setting things right between Shias and Sunnis! But believe me if he had enough resources and time, he would try his very best convincing our Dear Hindu brethren in humanity to know the truth about one God. We are so thankful that you took time out to cover an important subject in Islam. Please note that if you must know what Islam is all about, its all about the 12 Imams headed by Prophet Muhammad (SAWW) in Shia Islam. If you probe into Shia books you will find out that these 12 and Our Prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny) and his daughter Syeda Fatima (Salam Ullah Aleiyhaa) are the wisest and purest beings on earth. The sayings of these 14 infallible beings and their life history will surely Insha Allah convince you about their truthfulness. Please note that the 14 infallibles in Shia Islam are meant to guide the whole of humanity and not just Muslims. Just read about the 14 infallibles one by one in Shia Books online and you will be glued for an entire year reading about their most pious lives ever to be found in the history of mankind. Please note that once you chance upon the life of any of these pious beings, your nights will be spent searching pages after pages online for the most amazing and mind+life changing days ahead. So, proceed with caution. Remember, only Shia sources must be searched to read about them, strictly Shia sources only. And finally compare them with your most respected deities and beings in Hinduism, and subsequently with any religious and pious beings in any religion. One hundred percent guaranteed these 14 are like none other, starting from the first human on earth till the last human to appear. This is the claim of Shia sect in Islam. But like I said, only Shia sources. Its your priceless treasure waiting to be unearthed by you. I just happen to know where it is, but you have the key, as it is yours, so Dearest kind-hearted Brother, you ought to dig it and see for yourself.
Those who do not pay any heed to Allahyari Sahab will Insha Allah realize someday in near future about the truest intentions of Allahyari Sahab that all he wants is for Shias and Sunnis to read their books for themselves. That is all he is asking.
Allahyari App ki Hemat hai jo Jahilon ko Bardasht karty hain or in ki Fazoliyaat ko sunaty hai Muola Ali ka qool hai jahil ki bat ko Bardasht karna he Bara Alam hain Beshak Muola ki khas Karam Nawazi hai apki Hemat k leye Geo Muola salamat rakhain apko ❤
You have done an absolutely marvelous job here.
Panjtan pak AP ko hr bori Nazar se mehfooz rakhy Qibla ge Ameen ❤️
Jeo Allah yari bahi zindabad MOLA ALI AS apko slamat rkhy 😳😹😹😹👍
Wah Sheikh Sab ❤️ Mashaallah 🤲 Maula as Salamat rakhy 🤲 Shair🦁 Shair🦁 hota Hain Yar👍❤️
بسم الله ماشاء الله ياناصر دين النبي صلى الله عليه وآله الطيبين الطاهرين
Mashallah Hassan Allahyaari
Top class reply by Allahyari Sahab.
Salute to Sheikh Hassan Allahyari.
Imam Ali said that he is the Khalifa either way. If through God was the criterion, then he was the Imam. And if the old way (not the right way) of people choosing an Imam, then still he was chosen as the Imam. There was no third way. Absolutely world class reply by Allahyari Sahab.
Ordinary people would sweat upon hearing the argument presented by the honorable caller. So nice of him to have brought up the letter and allowing you to clarify it.
He may say that the two letters are different. Even if we agree that the letters are different (even though the topic of becoming an Imam is the common denominator in both of them) but still the letter in Nahjul Balagha cannot be trusted at all. It becomes completely null and void. If there is no SANAD, then by logic and rationale and the rules of Ahadees, the text cannot be relied upon at all. Because if this methodology of NO SANAD is accepted (even if its a direct letter written to somebody) and taken as the standard of accepting RIVAAYAAT, then God save the world. The author of Nahjul Balagha may have stated this as a letter but still he must have heard or copied it from somewhere, where someone with an actual name mentioned it. And it was only after finding out about the name that we could decide whether it was from a narrator from the opposition or not. And since we now know the overall subject matter of this letter, so a letter that talked about the exact same thing has been shown by Allahyari Sahab with a SANAD and the letter is complete too. Why not then believe in the complete letter that has SANAD too. Allahyari Sahab nailed it like a warrior. Absolutely marvelous. We are so absolutely proud of you. Long live Allahyari Sahab by the grace of Allah Subhanahuu Wa Taalaa. Imam Ali (Aleihissalam) and the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny ) would be so happy with him Masha Allah.
Your point also proved that since this particular letter where the main topic was that of becoming an Imam had no SANAD ; so when you showed the entire letter with SANAD from another authentic book, that somehow rationally and logically proved that with a proper opening and closing of the letter the exact same subject matter was being talked about in detail and comprehensively by Imam Ali. Therefore, after having seen the letter shown by you, the letter in Nahjul Balagha, even if tilts to people choosing the Imam as the rightful method (as the previous three Caliphs were chosen) now somehow seems shady and doubtful in its leaning towards the authenticity of the three caliphs becoming caliphs. Its total subject matter in people having the right seems totally incorrect. It indeed seems and smells like it was taken from the books of the opposition. Why? Because you have shown an original and complete letter with SANAD that, although may be a different letter for argument's sake, but still it talks about the exact same matter of becoming an Imam in its completeness of detail. That is if Allah chooses the Imam (and indeed that is the right way) then obviously Imam Ali is the Imam, and if people choose, still he is the Imam as he was subsequently chosen by three days of discussions between Muhajirs and Ansaars.
ABSOLUTELY MIND BLOWING ALLAYARI SAHAB. Top class in all respects.
Thanks to the caller for bringing up this contentious letter. It is all clear in the minds of all IMAM ALI LOVERS now.
Rightly said,it is wonderful that Allahyari saheb has turned his focus on Urdu language knowing people he has been debating extensively in Arabic for long time,now the issue of this letter ,it was a source of confusion but reference from Sulaim bin Quase has cleared the matter, thanks to Allama for his able response.
Mola Khush Rakkhein.
@@ZeewaqarHusnain-ny1uz Allah appko jaza e khair de.Ahlulbayt ka karam ho.
Allah apko salamat rakhe Allahyariii bhae
Allahyari Sahab, you nailed it big time.
Standing ovation for one complete week.
کلام بولتا ھے کہ مولا ع کا کلام ھے سبحان الله سبحان الله سبحان الله سبحان الله سبحان الله
Zindabad❤Allah sallamat rakhay ap ko Ameen
Allah Yari Sb apka jawab nhi. Really impressed by the way you have taken the discussion and closed it , confined it and concluded it. It was a productive time watching this video. JAZAKALLAH!
ماشاءاللہ قبلہ جیو آپ مولا آپ کو سلامت رکھے بحق الحسین علیہ السلام کے صدقے ❤️
❤🍀💛🍀❤چہاردہ معصومین علیہ السلام کی عزت و عظمت پر لاکھوں کروڑوں درود سلام ❤🍀💛🍀❤
P
P
Pp
P
Masha Allah Bahot Khub Qibla
Imam e zamana.a.t.f.s.Aap Ki Khidmat Ko Qabul kare. Aameen
Allah ne AAP ki itna ilm diya rashk hota hai mashallah
Hassanallah yaari sahab ❤️❤️❤️…laanallaho Umar summa aba Bakr Umar summa usman o Umar
Khtbaee shiqshiqya padhi jisme maula ali ne kha ki zabar dasti khelafat qamees ko pahanliya jabki os par fit nahi thi
Masha Allah
Mashallah, Qibla Hassan Allahyaari👍👍👍 you the best Shia Aalim🌺🌺🌺🌷🌷❤❤ , No One can beat you Inn Fiqaa issues ❤❤❤🌷🌷🌷👍👍👍
MashAllah MashAllah 🙌 Allah Pak Allahyari 🙏 ko salamat rakhain
Me sunni syed hu love you ALLAH YARI SAHAB
Salam
حسن صاحب آواز نہیں روکنا چاہئے
Agha these elements only come up for teasing
جزاکللا شیخ صاحب
Good Explaination Hassan Sahab
Sir you are doing very well work.
i real ejoyed it 🎉
SubhanAllah
Excellent work to answer his questions. Jazakallah sheikh
Mashaallah very well explained and gave the answer with correct proof and detailed explanation.... May God bless you sir Hassan and live happy life with happy life 😍😍😍😍😍
صحیح فرمایا شیخ صاحب ۔۔
Rightly said Sheikh.
A hadith is absolute from two people. (According to the hadiths of the books of Ahl al-Sunnah) The Prophet said If there was a prophet after me So Ali Ibn Abi Talib ﷺ would have been Ali (peace be upon him) has the same relationship with me as Moses (peace be upon him) had with (his cousin) Harun (peace be upon him). The only difference is that there will be no prophet after me
If only two hadees are taken 1.Hadeed Manzelat
2.Haders Saqlain , then hardly any thing is left and the path is clear for believers, for this reason we find efforts are made to negate them but in vain.
Mashsallah bahut khoob
1:14:21 pe umari bhai ne Quran ki ayat btai k un ko basharat suna den jo bat sune or haq ki perwi kren... To bhai hum ne Hassan allah yari ki bat sunni wohi haq pe thi..... Hum ne us ki perwi ki....
Janab e allahyari
WAKEEL.E.AHAL.E.BAIT ATAHAAR
MAOLA AAP KE rizq, maal, aolad, Jaan, izzat.o.aabru me barkaten ata farmayen . Ameen
Omari out of his depth, Buried by The Great Allahyari.
Great sir
MashaAllah
Best response Allayari... First learn muqalma sahab
Thanks brother
Mola salamat rakhy
Masha allah bro
Hassan allahyari moula apko salamat rakhy ❤️❤️❤️❤️
As a sunni I am embarrassed by that brother by the way he presented himself which had a tint of arrogance, he does not deserved to be entertained. May Allah bless and guide us all to the truth.
Salute to hassan bhai
Aapse baat kese kare mujhe kuch sawal puchne he
Iproud iam shia al humdulilah
Hasan Allahyari sahab is best
Bhot khobsoart jawab
In musalmano par afsoos hai kh har kisi ko jin ka koi level hei nahe in ko ahlbaith a. s kay moqabalay mai laatay hei afsoos hai aur yah kahtay hei kh hum musalman hei
اس عالم كو سلام يا على ص،ع مدد...على على
جناب سيدة الجليه سلام الله عليها كا چاهني والا.واه سائين آپ سلامت رهين
الهیاری بزرگوار موفق و کامگار باشی انشالله دستت درد نکنه
masallah
یاعلی٠مدد٠السلام علیکم
You deserve clapping for an entire week. That too by all TRUTH LOVERS.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿
Haq
Allahyari mola apko Khush rkhy yar
Allayari shb great mashallah
Very good
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Esa lgta h k shaitan Molvi ban k swal kr rha h 🤔😹😹
Ya molvi shaitan ban kay sawal kar raha hay😉
@@muhammadsiddiqui3038 😹😹😳👍
ALLAH YARI 🎉❤
Hassan great man
There is no Shia-Sunni ( sect ) in Quran! No doubt, those who follow Quran and Ahl e Bait are the perfect followers of the Prophet saw. Because Prophet saw said, I’m leaving two main things Quran and Ahl e Bait (as) whoever follows Quran and Ahl e Bait will never be wrong.
brother ..as salaam alkm...there are numerous hadith from the Prophet stating that Ali a.s and his shia are the people on Haq ,true path of the religion....The word shia has been used numerous amounts of time if u want references do reply back.. thank u...There is not a single hadith in the history of Islam from the Prophet or shahaba stating the word sunni..but the word shia and its explanation have been documentated in a number of hadith brother....
@@Purificationofsoul669 yeah! I know right.
Saare sawalat likh kr de diye jayein aur woh aur uss ke jawabat photo release ho..
Assalamunalaikum Agha.
Meri arz ye hai Imamat pr Quran se ayaat pesh ki jaen jaise ki Qari Sakhawat Ali Yazdani Saheb ne behtareen bayan apni majlis me kiya hai jiska unwan hai ki "IMAM KAISA HONA CHAHIYE ".Allaah ne Quraan me kinki Itteba ka hukm diya hai aur kinki ittèba se mana farmaya hai.Allah ke is hukm ke bar khilaaf Aalame Islaam (Aksariyat) ne jinko Apna Imaam banaya jinki Itteba ki Unke Kirdaar aur unki seerat Hadees se pesh ki jae to mere khayal me madad mile Mukhalefeen ko qaneh karne ke liye.Ghaleban 11 Ayaat hain Imamat aur Itteba ke hukm ke hawale se jo Qari Saheb ne apni Majlis me bayan farmaee hain.
❤️❤️❤️
Khabees roh kabi bi Haq ko nai pehchan sakti. Jis k Dil pr Allah ne mohhar laga de, wo kabi bi seedae raste pr nai ayae ga.
I Love you 💕💕💕💕💕 ALLAH YARE
Opposition is confused and hopeless. Allama is on next level.
Shia sunni is different bat hanest is most important.OK Allahari right way
Moula Ali as madad💕💞🤲🏻🙏🏻💞)(Hussan zindabad 🙋🏻💕🤲🏻🙏🏻)(mauiya lainati yazeed lainati hai,🔥🖐🏿🖐🏿👹❌🖐🏿🖐🏿
عالم سي بات كرنيكي آداب كاهر عام شخص كو پاس هونا چاهئي....شكريه
آفرین صد آفرین حسن
MashAllah Allah Yari saib is banda KO time kay siwa kcuh nayn ata aur bar bar beach main khoud bol ra ha
Allah allah yari saab sy deen k kaam lyta rahay or lambi umer atta frmahy...!😊
Yeh Ahle Sunnat, kabhi haq nahi manay gay Inn k khoon main Nafrat hain Muhammad SAW❤❤ aur Alay Muhammad SAW ❤❤sy yeh sirf baghoray Sahab Jo jangoon main Rasool Allah ko chor k farar ho gaye thy aur siyasat kr k Khalifa banay k liye siqefah main khud talwar k zor per Khalifa ban gaye unn ko afzal mantay hain
Allahyari sb zabardast jawab diya mashallah allah apko salamat rakhe
magar akhr me apne galat kiya agr wo banda apko.jhootha bhi kehe to apko chup kar k sunna tha phir apne bare me jo bolte liken ye galat bat hai k apne usko bolne nh diya bhale to galat bolta
The questioner is asking questions not to get knowledge or any clarifications. He is driven by his ego and here to satisfy it. Such people are in every field of knowledge and waste theirs and others time.
Yeh munafiq loug nahe mantey well done allahyari sahb
وارثانِ قُرآن بہ نفسِ قُرآن حصہ دوم
حضور(ﷺ) نے فرمایا، ”میں تمھارے درمیان دو گراں قدر چیزیں چھوڑے جا رہا ہوں ایک قُرآن اور دوسری میری عِطرت(اہلِ بیت)، یہ دونوں ایک دوسرے سے جدا نہ ہوں گے یہاں تک کہ قیامت میں حوض کوثر پر مجھ سے نہ آن ملیں، جوشخص اِن دونوں سے تمسّک رکھے گا وہ یقیناً نجات یافتا ہے اور جس نے دوری اختیار کی وہ یقیناً ہلاک ہو جائے گا، جب تک ان دونوں سے تمسّک رکھو گے ہرگز گمراہ نہ ہو گے‟ اور یہ کہ، ”میرے بارہ خلیفہ ہوں گے جن سب کا تعلق قبیلہ قریش سے ہو گا اور اِن میں آخری مُحَمَّد المھدی ہو گا‟ (صحاح ستہ)-
ملتِ اسلامیہ میں کوئی سلسلہِ خلافت مذکورہ بالا قُرآنی جملہ وراثتی صفات اور مُستند اَحادیث کے مَعیار پر پورا نہیں اُترتا ما سوائے اِس سلسلے کے: علی بن ابو طالب، حسن بن علی، حسُین بن علی، علی بن حسُین، مُحَمَّد بن علی، جعفر بن مُحَمَّد، موسَىٰ بن جعفر، علی بن موسَىٰ، مُحَمَّد بن علی، علی بن مُحَمَّد، حسن بن علی اور مُحَمَّد بن حسن- امام مُحَمَّد المھدی عَلَیْہ السَّلَام اللہ کی مشیعت کےتحت پردہ ِغیب میں ہیں جس طرح حضرت ادریس، خزر، الیاس اور عیسَیٰ عَلَیْہ السَّلَام- شب قدر میں مَلَائِکہ اور روح القُدس کا نزول ہوتا ہے اور وہ لاتے ہیں اللہ کا اَمر (سورة القَدر آیت-4)، جو کہ دلیل ہے کسی صاحب ِ اَمر کے ہونے کی جن کے پاس اَمر آتا ہے اور وہ امام ِحاضر مُحَمَّد المھدی عَلَیْہ السَّلَام ہیں -”۔ ۔ ۔پھر ہم نے قُرآن کے وارث بناے مصطفےٰ (چُننے ہوئے) بندے۔ ۔ ۔‟ (سورة فَاطر آیت-32)- اللہ مصطفےٰ بندوں پر سَلام بھیجتا ہے (سورة النَّمل آیت-59)- اِسی لیئے وارثِ قُرآن ہونے کی حثیت سے مسجد نبوی میں اِن کے ناموں کے ساتھ عَلَیْہ السَّلَام کندہ ہے- ” اے ایمان والو! اﷲ سے ڈرتے رہو اور اہلِ صدق (کی معیّت) میں شامل رہو‟ (سورة توبہ آیت-119)- حضور(ﷺ) نے فرمایا،” میرے بارویں خلیفہ کا جب ظہور ہوگا تو آسمان سے عیسَیٰ (وارثِ انجیل) آئیں گے اور نماز پڑھیں گے مُحَمَّد المھدی (وارثٍ قُرآن) کے پیچھے‟ (صحاح ستہ)-
Abu ashja tumne to allahyari sahab ka style hi chura liya .har dekhne wala bata sakta hai .samne se to pata chalta hai jinko aap ideal mante hai wo to apse bahot oopar honge
وارثانِ قُرآن بہ نفسِ قُرآن
قُرآن میراث ہے اور اللہ نے اِس کے وَارث مصطفے بندوں کو بنایا (سورة فاطر آیت-32)- کیونکہ وارث ہمیشہ میراث سے اَفضل ہوتا ہے اِسی لیئے اگر وَارث پر مصیبت آجائے تو جان بچانے کے لیئے اپنی میراث ( مال و دولت وغیرہ) کو صرف کر دیتا ہے- اِسی افضلیت کے تناظر میں وارثانِ قُرآن پر نظر ڈالتے ہیں-
قُرآن اَلعِلم ہے (سورة آل ِ عمراَن آیت-61)، تو وارثانٍ قُرآن بابُ العلم، اُوتو العلم (جنہیں علم سے نوازا گیا) اور رَاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ (علم میں راسخ ) ہستیاں ہیں- قُرآن کا حقیقی مفہوم اللہکےعلاواہ رَاسِخُونَ فِي الْعِلْمِ ہستیاں جانتی ہیں (سورة آل ِ عمراَن آیت-7)- ”اگر کوئی قُرآن ہوتا جس کے وسیلے پہاڑ چلاے جاتے یا زمین کے فاصلے طے کیے جاتے یا مردوں سے کلام کیا جاسکتا تو یہ قُرآن ہے ۔ ۔ ۔‟ (سورة الرّعد آیت-31)- لہٰذا جس کے سینے میں قُرآن ہو گا اُس میں قُرآنی اُوصاف ہونگے- قُرآن واضع نورِ ہدایتہے (سورة النِّسَاء آیت-174) اور وارث مجسمِ نورِ ہدایت- قُرآن مُهَيۡمن (اَمین، غالب، حَاکم، محّافظ، نگہبان) ہے (سورة المَائدة آیت-48) اور وارث اَمین، محّافظ، نگہبان اور اَلا کلُ ِغالب ہیں- قُرآن بے عیب ہے یعنی اِس ہیں کوئی کجی نہیں (سورة الزُّمرآیت-28) اور وارث ہرعیب سے پاک- قُرآن معصوم ہے یعنی باطل کا اِس کے پاس گزر ناممکن ہے (سورة فصِلَت آیت-42) اور وارث بھی معصوم ہستیاں ہیں- بہ کتاب بصیرت، حُجت، عقل اور فکر ہے (سورة الأعرَاف آیت-52) اور وارث صاحبِ بصیرت اور حُجّت اللہ ہیں- قُرآن وَاضح بیان اورمُسلمانوں کے لیئے ہدایت، خوشخبری اور رحمت ہے (سورة النّحل آیت-89)، اور وارث نورِ ہدایت اور رحمت ہیں- قُرآن حکمت سے سرشار ہے (سورة یٰس آیت-2) اور وارث حِکمت کی معراج- یہ کتاب برحق ہے یعنی اِس میں سچ کے سوا کچھ نہیں (سورة فَاطرآیت-31) اور وارث اہلٍ حق کیونکہ 9- ہجری میں جب نجران کے عیسَایوں سے حضرت عیسیٰ عَلَیْہ لسَّلَام کی ولدیت کے مسعلے پر اتفاق نہ ہوسکا تو اللہ کے حکم پر حضور نے انھیں مباہلے کی دعوت دی (سورة آل ِ عمراَن آیت-61) اور اِس دعوتِ عام میں جو کہ جنگِ صداقت تھی آپ صرف صدیق ہستیوں (مولا علی، امام حسن و حسُین عَلَیْہ لسَّلَام اور بی بی فاطمہ سلام اللہ علیہا) کو ساتھ لے کر مباہلے کے لیئےتشریف لائے؛ لیکن عیسَایوں کے بڑے پادری عبدل مسیح نے مباہلہ کرنے سے انکار کر دیا اور جزیہ دینا قبول کیا- اِس واقعہِ مباہلے کو اللہنے قصہِ حق کہا (سورة آل ِ عمراَن آیت-62)- قُرآن عظیم ہے یعنی بلند رتبے والا (سورة الحجِر آیت-87) اور وارث نباءعظیم (عظیم خبر: غدیر خم میں اعلانِ ولایت مولا علی عَلَیْہ لسَّلَام)- قُرآن مبین ہے یعنی درخشاں اور مبالغے سے پاک کلام (سورة یٰس آیت-69)، اور وارث اِمام ِمبین (سورة یٰس آیت-12)- یہ کتاب بے مثل ہبے یعنی تمام جن و اِنس مل کر قُرآنی سورتوں کی مثل ایک سوره بهی نہیں لا سکتے (سورة الاسراء آیت-88) اور وارث بے مثل- قُرآن مجید ہے یعنی جلیل اُلقدر (سورة قٓ آیت-1) اور وارث پیکرِ اقدارٍآعلیٰ- قُرآن تبیان ہے یعنی اَپنی بات منواتا ہے (سورة النّحل آیت-89) اور وارث ہر محاز پر غالب رہنے والے- قُرآن فرقان ہے یعنی حق اور باطل میں فیصلا کرنے والا (سورة الفُرقان آیت-1) اور وارث حق اور باطل کو عیاں کرنے والے- وقعہ کربلا کے بعد سرِ مبارک اِمام حسین عَلَیْہ لسَّلَام کا نوکٍ نیزہ پر قُرآن کی تلاوت کرنا اِس اَمر کی روشن دلیل ہے- قُرآن کریم ہے یعنی بڑے رتبے والا (سورة الواقِعَة آیت-77) اور وارث مرتبے کی معراج- قُرآن اہِلِ اِیمان کےلیئے شّفا (پیاس بجهانا)، یعنی حاجت روا ہے (سورة فُصِلَت آیت-44) اور وارث مالکِ شّفا- قُرآن ذکر ہے (سورة صٓ آیت-1) اور وارث اہلِ ذکر- قُرآن کا مکمل سمھجنا مشکل ہے (سورة آل ِ عمراَن آیت-7) اور وارث مشکل کشا ہیں- قُرآن طاہر ہے نیز اِس کی معنویت کی گہرائی تک نہیں پہنچ سکتا مگر طاہر (سورة واقعہ آیت-79) اور طہارت کے زُمرے میں اہلِ بیت کا مقام بلند ترین ہے کیونکہ بی بی فاطمہ سلام اللہ علیہا، مولا علی، اِمام حسن اور حسُین عَلَیْہ لسَّلَام حضور کے ساتھ چادر کے اندر موجود تھے جب ارشاد ہوا: ”۔ ۔ ۔ اللہ نے یہ ارادہ کر لیا کہ صرف اور صرف اے اہلِ بیت تمھیں ہر نجاست سے دور رکھے اور اِس طرح ح پاک رکھے جو پاکیزگی کا حق ہے‟ (سورة الأحزاب آیت-33)-
جاری حصہ دوم میں
A true fact the zulm done on the prophet and his family is way to bad (inna liĺlahi wa inna ilayhi rajioon )lanath ullah alal qaumi'zalmineen (allah humma sale ala muhammadin wa ale muhammad s.a.w.w.
Allama sahab khuda AP ko Salmat rakhy . Ma khak Banda AP alim han mujy AP ki debate sun k bus shaheed ALLMA WAKEEL HAQ R ZEHRA S.A ZAKIR E AHLIBAIT NAISR ABBAS MULATNI KI BAAT YAD ARHI HA WO HOTY TU AIK BAT KAH K BAAT KHTAM KARTY KI ya sab nay Naqal ( duplicate) kia ha Matlab ASal ( Original) nahi ha .Kitna b Bada muhadees ha ASal nhi likh sakta .
Aalama Sahab khabi molna mazoor mingal Sahab se b munazara karin