How to work out the geometry of any geodesic dome.

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @johnnybayles7412
    @johnnybayles7412 4 роки тому +9

    You're a legend, Paul! Can't wait for the book.

  • @tobygarratt6032
    @tobygarratt6032 4 роки тому +2

    I really look forward to getting my hands on that book!

  • @nicholsconstruction1
    @nicholsconstruction1 3 роки тому

    You are brilliant. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!!

  • @audigit
    @audigit 3 роки тому

    Thank you Paul. I will buy the book, as will thousands of other for reference .

  • @simonchis9333
    @simonchis9333 4 роки тому +1

    Looking forward to the book!

  • @McSchteve
    @McSchteve Рік тому

    Also if there is a link to your book I would be most interested in reading it. Fascinating topic! Thanks in advance! 🙂

  • @NonStopNeal
    @NonStopNeal 4 роки тому

    Incredible ! Cant wait for the book .

  • @PiersRippey
    @PiersRippey 4 роки тому

    extremely clarifying, thank you!

  • @sircharlesr
    @sircharlesr 2 роки тому

    Do you have chord factors for a class Ii geodesic dodecahedron?

  • @jorgemodias1
    @jorgemodias1 2 роки тому

    When is the book available?

  • @CharlieTokowitz-gg9nu
    @CharlieTokowitz-gg9nu 4 місяці тому

    Hi Paul. Any idea how to determine the geodesic geometry of the cinerama dome in Hollywood?

    • @Geo-Dome
      @Geo-Dome  4 місяці тому +1

      Yes it's the same method, just find two pentagons and count between. I looked at a few pictures and a UA-cam video to find the pentagons and it's very similar to the Epcot. Same class II (pentakis dodecahedron) but a 9 frequency open honeycomb design. I'll do a video a post a link as it's a very interesting dome.

    • @CharlieTokowitz-gg9nu
      @CharlieTokowitz-gg9nu 4 місяці тому

      @@Geo-Dome that would be terrific! I am working on building a 3D model and am investigating different geodesic tools

  • @halo2x
    @halo2x Рік тому

    Where can I buy your book sir?

  • @PablitoSroczynski
    @PablitoSroczynski Рік тому

    Hey, what about your book ? I'd love to read it.

  • @pichikian
    @pichikian 3 роки тому

    A Geodesic Rhombic Dodecahedron, or Truncated Rhombic Dodecahedron, have also Squares, in fact the squares have a nice and Tri-Axial formation to work with. And since Rhombic Dodecahedron is derived from compression of most uniform Sphere Packing, these are Space Fillers. And Prefabricated Houses can be accumulated on top of one another.

  • @randallroberts431
    @randallroberts431 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you for your videos! Question: could the EPCOT sphere used in your example also be considered a 16V Class II (Triacon) Geodesic?

    • @Geo-Dome
      @Geo-Dome  4 роки тому +2

      Yes, the trouble is that there are a number of different ways to describe geodesic geometry and it can be quite confusing, Icosahedron used to be called "alternative method" by Fuller then class I. I just find it simpler to say what the base polyhedron is.

  • @markmarsh27
    @markmarsh27 3 роки тому

    Bucky would have kissed you right on the mouth like you were his Son Paul .... LOVE your videos, you're helping BIG TIME to waken human consciousness to the CRITICAL concept of "doing more with less" which is Humanity's ONLY hope.

  • @SwedeEad
    @SwedeEad 4 роки тому

    A book. Excellent!

  • @kickinghorse2405
    @kickinghorse2405 2 роки тому

    Ah,
    A Druidi man.
    Or, whatever. :)
    Where might one acquire your offering?

  • @nicolascote7220
    @nicolascote7220 3 роки тому

    This is a good idea. It allows democratizing this hard-to-chew knowledge. However, I suggest keeping the exact identification in the book as additional information. It allows the purists to trace back

  • @anlfrat8411
    @anlfrat8411 4 роки тому +1

    My dream home is dome in a dome in another dome.

  • @مهندساحترافي
    @مهندساحترافي Рік тому

    شرح ممتاز

  • @JamecBond
    @JamecBond 3 роки тому +3

    Why would you need a base polygon? That defeats the entire purpose of a geodesic dome. The point of a geodesic dome is to approximate a circle using triangles, aka a polygon abstraction of a circle. Why would you then want ANOTHER layer to this? Utterly pointless, its the circle your trying to replicate for its unique structural properties, not a octahedron or dodecahedron, which themselves are further approximations of a circle? This is very strange and very...idk what the word is....irrational?