Classical sociological theory - Marx, Weber, Durkheim
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лют 2016
- In this lecture, Dr. Tom Rudel overviews three classical sociological theorists - Marx, Weber and Durkheim. He notes that all three are structuralists, but that each identifies a different force that structures economic activity and outcomes. He describes Marx’s focus on the factory as the site of consumption and production, and he notes the contemporary theories of the treadmill of production and world systems as deriving from Marx’s theories. He then summarizes the theories of Weber, who sees the rationalized state as structuring production and consumption, and he highlights ecological modernization and notions of a world society as updates of Weber’s theories. Finally, he discusses Durkheim’s ideas about occupations and the division of labor as structuring economic activity, and notes the theoretical assumption that stability and technological developments are generated by economic specialization.
More information on the Immersion Program and other lectures can be found here: www.sesync.org/for-you/educato.... - Наука та технологія
I'm revising for a social theory exam as part of an anthropology degree, and I just wanted to say not only did I learn a great deal, but I thoroughly enjoyed your lecture. I find your pace and delivery really easy to absorb, wish I had you as a lecturer!
I like the classroom n the mix of diff ages..... N obviously the lecture....
14:11 that laughter is more random than my existence
Well explained
Thank you.
Professor I have one Question Regarding karl marx
Did karl marx Advocate for the one party'system??
Thank You SIR
very nice
NICE EFFORT
this guy looks exactly like Durkheim
Specialist in particular things make more alienate form on other.
17:41
I died on the opening slide. Do professors really still kill their audience this way?
😆
I’ve never not said “oeuvre” the same way as this professor.
He's trying to pronounce it the way the French do, but comically fails. It's not "Oooevvv", but rather "Errvruh".
.....................
Mmmm, must buy tangerines tomorrow!
Started with Marx as an economic determinist...ok..
Isn't it weird that all the people with long hair are sitting at the same table?
Cool hair table, no baldies allowed
interesting,
your diction or choice of words are way too big.
but I enjoyed it
Reminds me of Walter White
The first places to introduce institutional entities that managed the macro to the micro was communist Russia, namely the roles of the nomenklatura and the apparatchiks who formed the core of state decision making. Although I take your point about the fascist regimes, after all both fascism and communism are two sides of the same coin (authoritarian, state owned production, militaristic). Even if communist ideals didn't intend to be overtly authoritarian or with any inclinations to militarism, to a dictator, that is how they ended up.
666 Rule: Am I nothing to you?
Jevon's paradox. Not much of a paradox when the efficiency of energy production is outstripped by the increase of wealth of an increasing population. Sounds like a social benefit not a social problem. The issue of oil palm devestation is not the devistation of oil palm than that devistation wrought by oil palm. Oil palm is a consequence of failed and immature view of the environment manifested as climate change action, a failed group think that sought to solve purely theoretical problems and in so doing created very real environmental problems and suffering with the ensuing food shortages and price increases relative to the economic status of that part of the world dependant of food production that was significantly reduced to serve a wealthy western population subversibvly manipulated by neurotic intellectuals desperate to define notional environmental problems as imminent threats to mankind. Such experiences are proof once again (for example Marx's theories all failed in the cold light of reality too), that macro management of society, economies and the evironment (all complex systems) is folly. The complexity of these systems is by necessity of the effectiveness of our modernist political, societal and ethical ideas and actions incomprehensible. If these systems were comprehensible, then we would not be functioning, as a species, to our potential.
wow thats a good lecture, but u r english is too much strog, hence i have do not understand u r lecture . and i am so much interested sociology lecture...
Najid Rehman Im also interested to this but his English is too much
Maybe you guys should learn English
Are you kidding? This is a university accredited lecture where there is an implied knowledge of specialised terms associated with the subject.Get yourself a sociology dictionary and have some fun learning the concepts.This is a privilege getting access to lectures like these.
bruh close caption
dude, you should enrol in an IELTS course, or ESOL to improve your English skills. English is important in learning courses, especially in the academia.
You dont read off a paper in a good youtube video... Very off-putting and dimishes quality