Samson's Take: Why Prof Gyimah Boadi indicts Akufo Addo on corruption
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Samson's Take: Why Prof Gyimah Boadi indicts Akufo Addo on corruption
#Newsfile
#MyJoyOnline
#JoyNews
www.myjoyonlin...
Subscribe for more videos just like this:
/ @myjoyonline
Follow us on:
Facebook: / joy997fm
Twitter: / joy997fm
Instagram: bit.ly/3J2l57
Click on this for more news:
www.myjoyonlin...
Samson is a gem and must be protected at all times ❤
NPP has destroyed Ghana
That’s true, you are consistent as always
So who at all is Government Official 1?
wo maame tw3 kankan is government official 1 go and arrest it. jon.
Great.I admire your objectivity.keep it up samson
I'm now beginning to like you, getting a bit objective and now coming out strongly on this current corrupt government.
Set your own question answer and mark your script as'Excellent'
He does that all the time.
We ghanaians don't understand democracy. How come that a president have that much power in a democratic nation? I hope the IWF don't borrow any more money so we learn to create something on our own.
THE CARICATURE STATUTES INFRONT OF THE SUPREME COURT MUST BE REMOVED BECAUSE THERE'S NO MEANING TO THAT.
Akufo Addo the grand mother serpent of corruption
You are what you really are, OR become one of your colleagues in the THAT organisation as the TRADE MARK. Don't you know the difference between Auditor General Department and the Auditor General as a person ?
It's like you are one of those pessimists who always see negative things but not positive aspects
What is positive about npp n that wasteful prez
You just came out from your hole I guess.
Be factual in your narrative. He wasn't sacked.
He was sacked fullstop. The supreme courts ruling calls the president a lawless one.
He was what??? Tell us
@@swugjay7189 Think critically and don't let the opinions of people shape your thoughts. If Domlevo was sacked, why was the matter before the Supreme Court, because an appointing authority can dismiss the appointee at any time.
Let me help you. Domlevo had accumulated leave for about 100 days and was directed by the president to take it (which is within the purview of the president). Few days before he was to resume, he was asked to retire because he had reach the retirement age of 60 years. His contention was that there was a mistake on his age, and that he wasn't 60 yrs but the document on official records had him at 60 and his passport had him at 58. This is the issue that went before the court. The president could have given him extention but he chose not to. So you see, it's not accurate to say he was sacked? You can say he was let go on a technicality but you can't say he was sacked.
@@cojoopoku4946 the GRA boss was granted contract extensions even after clocking 60 yrs, without ever being "forced" to go on leave. Does this show equity?
@@abigailoko8186That is the prerogative of the president. My contention however,is the misleading narrative put out by the host, claiming Domlevo was sacked where as he wasn't.