People can lament all they want about Witten... But at least he teaches sth to the common people who don't get all that deep into the matter.... Very "not expert friendly" but very well targeted for people like, who tried to study physics but didn't know "what the fuss was all about".... Excellent teacher in my view.... ( Highly opinionated opinion)
As a bhikkhu, usually i used the time for listening, analysing and practicing Dhamma which was taught by Gotama the Buddha, of course through the lectures or presentations by elders monks and buddhist authors. But honestly, the way these scientists have been making the conversations, or how they observe the things and learnt from that... encouraged me so much on the way truths need to be figering out by my own. It may be called, at least for me, a consolation, which is hard to see in the native communities (monks and others). Thanks Prof!
@@lachris8710 yes upon reflecting, I think you are correct this is the problem. Although he is working on other things too like pure Quantum field theories, Chern Simons theory etc, he might be having some bad feelings too of what the sentiment on string theory is currently in the physics community
@@lachris8710 my point was that theoretical physicists don't stop working on things because it's "probably wrong". If they did we would be missing alot of physics today
We weren’t consulted when the nose disappeared off the Spinx. When cities where destroyed and all kinds of things done out of opinion. Even today highly educated people can’t gather enough clues to figure it out. So maybe the Babylon clay tablets will leave more to posterity than we do. Your attention is not misplaced with admirable respect
Hey dude thanks for sharing this, i can listen to this over and come back and slowly make sense of bits and pieces of this crazy world. My mind isn't evolved enough to make sense of the math and with a pollution of information out there it's really refreshing to hear from someone who knows what they are talking about. you coulda used this genius for evil and instead you're helping me make sense of stuff thanks.
That string theory enables us to unite gravity and QM is in itself a miracle, giving us an insight into the reality that is related to hologram, counting entropy etc. Loss of information in a BH that reappears when the next cycle of CCC is indeed shown by Penrose as indispensable.
The striking thing is to realise that when Physicists ‘discover’ various particles that super-unify various string theories, these phenomena have all always existed and have been in operation since the dawn of time, we only just became aware - and when i say ‘we’, i mean Tesla, Einstein & Edward Witten, not me and nearly all of you.
I had to pause 1:30 in. Perhaps a better explanation of how speed is additive (at low speeds) would be those moving conveyor belts at airports. When you hop on those, and then walk, when you get to the end you get a wild burst of speed, both speeds added together.
His genius is contagious. Light always travels at the same speed cz maybe it travels independent of the geometry of space we're used to? I know gravitational lensing but then there's the doppler effect to counter it at macro level. So why is the universe 'expanding' ?
Anyone reading this to you I admire your hunger for knowledge as my vibrations become more collective. I’m starting to be able to understand more complex ideas.
using medication as a way to insult or belittle someone is not productive or helpful. It's important to respect others' experiences and perspectives, and to avoid making assumptions about their mental state based on their medication use or lack thereof. By learning more about mental health and developing greater empathy and understanding, you can help reduce stigma and discrimination and create a more supportive and compassionate environment for everyone.
Yes, to truly understand physics one must learn the prerequisite mathematics and then learn physics within the mathematical context. That said, it is still certainly enlightening to read and listen to physics communicators that transcribe the precise mathematical descriptions of physics into crude english.
Ok, so I get it! "Stuff" is crystalized "spacetime! There you go! I figured it all out! (lol) See - there is just SO MUCH spacetime, an INFINITE amount, so much of it that there's a tiny bit of "residue" from it all - and that "residue" is "matter"
Schrödinger: If you ask a physicist what is his idea of yellow light, he will tell you that it is transversal electromagnetic waves of wavelength in the neighborhood of 590 millimicrons. If you ask him: But where does yellow come in? he will say: In my picture not at all, but these kinds of vibrations, when they hit the retina of a healthy eye, give the person whose eye it is the sensation of yellow. Weyl: The characteristic of an n-dimensional manifold is that each of the elements composing it (in our examples, single points, [...] colors, tones) may be specified by the giving of n quantities, the "co ordinates," which are continuous functions within the manifold. EPR: ...every element of the physical reality must have a counterpart in the physical theory.
Hebrews11: 3 "By faith we perceive that the systems of things were put in order by God's word, so thet what is beheld has come to be out of things that do not appear."
Imagine 8B Ed Witten brains on one planet...since there are billions of possibilities for planets like ours...it could exist now...imagine that society, that world...
@@DonRoyalX True but garbage man is essential job, mcdonald isnt. And maybe in an intellectually advanced society, all the shitty jobs are done by robots
Think about an explosion creating shockwave through air. If you run toward or away from the explosion, it will take less or more time for that shockwave to reach you. The shockwave moves at the speed of sound and only at the speed of sound. However, photons created in the explosion will reach you in the same exact amount of time regardless of where or how you move. The only thing that changes is the frequency of the light. However, this is only from your perspective. Another observer further away will see the light reach you at different at different times, depending on your motion. This is nearly impossible to detect in ordinary circumstances, but boy, is it weird. What does it mean when two different observers have two different observations of the same reality? This is where I understand the time component comes in, shifting in it's rate, to compensate for the difference between observers?
Dr Written, I have a question..when you blow a balloon, and when we say that balloon is expanding, then something is expanding it which is air in this case..but when we say that space is expanding..what is expanding it? What is the fabric of space made up of? If the space of fabric is made of something then it means that the big bang is still happening and there is a fundamental energy or force that is pushing everything and creating time as well. If we could figure it out I think we would be able to find different dimensions of time as well.
Wow it the 1st person besides myself that has ever mentioned wondering that! If we describe the big bang like an m80 going off, what constitutes the "bang?" From the time it starts till it's no longer seen or heard. So the big bang did not happen 13.8 billion years ago! We are in the midst of it right now. And if time is relative, I believe that when there wasn't a lot going on, B4 novelty, time would have been perceived differently. So I think either there was and is still acceleration, or since time is related to matter and novelty, things we think happened in milliseconds actually took longer but we're thinking of time as linear. What u think? I been thinking about this long time
modern physicists are debating whether it is the negative pressure of dark energy that expands the universe or not or the higgs field or a couple other things but nothing is written in stone so to speak
@39:00 one could equally _legitimately_ say that if your theory requires supersymmetry _and_ extra dimensions for consistency it is a hint telling you your theory is likely wrong and you are not using the correct physical constraints. Is the hint saying your theory is more likely wrong than not? I could not say, I'm "just sayin". The fact a theory has gravitons is a pretty mild favourable result, since gravity occurs in any theory which is generally covariant (respects position and rotation gauge invariance). I think strong theory is the right conceptual idea, but it is not well formulated, and finding alternative extended object models for matter that are minimalist (4D spacetime, no supersymmetry) is something more people should be working on.
Say I’m going the speed of light and hypothetically turned on a flash light, if my eyes were good enough and body resilient enough, would I see the tail end of that beam of light as I chase it? What does it look like to be chasing light at the speed of light?
Well no, why? The closer you go to the speed of light the slower time flows, meaning photons don't actually experience any time at all so if you moved at the speed of light time would stop for you and let's say in 0s an infinite time would pass outside your reference frame. I hope that this helps
Dank, There is no such thing as 'the speed of light' any more than there is a speed of water, or rocks. There are as many speeds as there are influences on a partical/wave, by a massive object. Eddington proved that. Leave the flashlight in the glove box-until you get a faster car.
I can’t understand what is difference between electric and magnetic fields. What is the carrier of the magnetic field. And why light is an electromagnetic wave if there are no electrons there
would be nice when the available automatic subtitles would include all spoken languages in the video. is this something that one can configure as creator, or is it solely on youtube? this would be a nice fix!
You can follow this up with, "why aren't all the smart people hyper wealthy?" Because they are human. And like all humans, have their own psychology. Which is shaped by genetics and environment (past experiences etc).
Correct! It is a 1 dimensional manifold, though the behavior of an "open" string matches that of a violin string and a "closed" string a rubber band. The one dimensional generationalization isn't even quite correct, the abstract object is a "brane", a 0 dimensional brane is a point, 1 a string, and 2 a membrane. The beautiful analogy to a musical instrument shouldn't fool you into thinking the behavior of strings is simple, dirichlet branes aka d-branes are crazy weird. String theory also give weird but brilliant ideas like AdS/CFT correspondance and ER=EPR
1:45 is the real peculiarity of the speed of light not that it is independent of its source speed but that it is independent of the observer's speed. Since mechanical waves are independent of their source's speed also. So has he misspoken here. I cant believe i'm correcting Ed Witten. Edit: it's pretty amazing to have a history of physics talk given by such a giant of physics
A atom is to the entire observable universe, as a string is to an atom, so small is a string. And a string is a filament vibrating. But is it possible that a string is just energy vibrating knot’s. And how can the know how small a string is. Is I possible that they are let’s say only 1/1000 of an elementary particles?
I don't think anyone has measured his IQ, not like it really matters. IQ is a subjective metric at the end of the day. I would estimate between ~160-180 IQ.
Why suddenly UA-cam is pushing this person in the mid of the show ? Do you really believe things happens out of causality ? I think here is a reason and someone who has the power to do it is pushing him in the social media.
I’m not sure when this was recorded, I would say at least two decades if not 3 to be honest. Eventually the fact that the super large hadron collider did not come up with any single slightest signs of super symmetric particles since then we’ve been left with you know not much in fact. That doesn’t take away the brilliance and sharpness of this guy’s mind to be honest, but fundamentally and I think he knows it we have been wrong and possibly we have been wrong for quite awhile.
I feel you don’t diminish achievement. He is someone idolized by who knows. Some that are here or maybe others that aren’t born yet. Even the courts reverse decision. It’s the way life goes on. My time here has been with a personal positive characteristic regarding the importance of Demi- gods
If you take, for example, the periodic table Alpha=Sigma squared, you have the mass of all the gases. 18 times 18 = 324.; X .Z.Y axis is each 108. . You live in the 6th house. 18 in the periodic table.
mind you this is all my opinion and you can discard it as you will but I'm likely never to agree with GR and QM and the consensus scholars likewise me, for I have found no convincing evidence to suggest that spacetime is a real thing beyond a conceptual tool for measurements nor that light is non-mechanical or a wave-particle duality. also, no thing can be a wave-particle duality for this is an irreconcilable contradiction and a lackadaisical description thereof. GR is merely a few presumptive equations conceptualized by observing for example the path in which two celestial sized magnets travel as their fields impress upon each other. the appearance of light curving around massive objects is merely the faraday effect on a grand scale. Gravity also is not the acceleration of mass toward mass along the curve of space time but the acceleration toward a null pressure point between the two fields. light is a field perturbation modality rather than a particle-wave and is in other words a disturbance in the medium in which it travels along, within and cannot escape from. so you need to understand what manifests empty space to know what that medium is. there is a missing component to the EM and EMR model which is dielectricity and this is that invisible inert energy field that is responsible for the existence of everything in the physical universe. there are only two types of geometry and that is the physical and field geometries. what manifests empty space is magnetism and what manifests electricity and illumination is the impression of the magnetic field upon the dielectric field as the electric field converts into the magnetic and so on. so the dielectric field is inertia and the magnetic field is the loss of that inertia and they necessitate polarity and the electric field is the hybridization of the two which then results in the field perturbation modality that is light. it is typically thought that the electric field and magnetic create each other but this is an incorrect description of the phenomena to justify the idea of light being self propagating or non-mechanical. everything within the physical geometry is light and everything outside of it is of dielectricity. so when the dielectric overcomes the magnetic, light vanishes from the physical universe ie becomes a black hole. the mass maintains but is converted into inert energy and you can no longer see it and these same principles explain atoms and so called subatomic particles. subatomic particles are essentially descriptions of various modalities of the proton which is electrostatic. this means that atoms are essentially electrostatic dynamos or spherically harmonic manifestations of high energy light. electrons do not exist but are merely units of diectric discharge due to the spherical harmonics of the electrostatic dynamo. all this is a simplified description and explanation of a new unifying model where gravity is merely a modality of magnetism and light is a field perturbation modality of the three fields that are one and necessitate each other's existence(dielectric field, magnetic field, electric field), but to the average human mind this will likely appear as a pile of word salad and excrement, but to a true academic with an open competent faculty of mentation it will prove to be worth investigation and the inevitable truth that persists through scrutiny and lies.
Honestly, how has Witten helped you on an individual level? Physics is a great subject, but it’s a distraction. And if it’s true that it hasn’t progressed in the last 40 years makes things even more interesting. Anyhow, what the world needs is more people like Linus Pauling. The priorities are soooo off with people. It’s such smoke and mirrors.
Doc, Marylin (Norma Jean) Monroe understood the power of sex so well, she probably never thought of it. That was in the 50s. Today, she might not get a second look. Same for Liz Taylor. I like Weinstein's style of intellect. Not that I 'understand' either his, or Witten's genius. But more because I don't enjoy laboring over a technical construct, finally getting the idea (string theory), only to walk away wondering, 'What is it?' Even Witten says, 'We have five pieces, and another smaller part. Maybe that smaller part is what makes it 'super string theory', and that makes it worth the Fields Medal. 'Norma Jean' probably knows, but doesn't think about it.
The only person I’ve ever seen who seems like he’s reading from a teleprompter, but it’s literally him uploading from the files in his brain to us
I suspect he is autistic ...Or an Alien!👽I think Elon Musk also is on the Autistic scale similar to this man, just not so much...
His slides are word for word what he presents at symposia. If you can hear his voice in your head, you can just read his slides in your own time.
Well this might be what he teaches in an intro physics class
Pretty sure he’s autistic. He shows a LOT of signs.
@@saltydog0539 There's a lot of research that suggests that communication becomes increasingly difficult as the IQs between the individuals diverge.
His humility in his intelligence says it all, consise, factual, and proven, and I love his calmness
Witten is a man who thinks in mathematics and translates it into English in real time.
The real proof of how intelligent this guy is, is that he speaks coherently, correctly and comprehensively about very advanced topics.
It's amazing how such a brilliant mind understands the world! Thank you Mr. Witten.
I like his voice, soft and smooth
Thank you Dr. Witten for taking your time to explain this from your valuable perspective.
People can lament all they want about Witten... But at least he teaches sth to the common people who don't get all that deep into the matter.... Very "not expert friendly" but very well targeted for people like, who tried to study physics but didn't know "what the fuss was all about".... Excellent teacher in my view.... ( Highly opinionated opinion)
Has anyone noticed he never once sayed "aaaa..."...he just pauses and takes a breathe...what a calming voice as well
56:59
@@deependra_bro and its 100 points for you sir !! Cheers from Italy !
An amazing mind. It's a privileged time I live in, that I'm able to listen to him speak. Amazing
As a bhikkhu, usually i used the time for listening, analysing and practicing Dhamma which was taught by Gotama the Buddha, of course through the lectures or presentations by elders monks and buddhist authors.
But honestly, the way these scientists have been making the conversations, or how they observe the things and learnt from that... encouraged me so much on the way truths need to be figering out by my own.
It may be called, at least for me, a consolation, which is hard to see in the native communities (monks and others).
Thanks Prof!
What's bhikkhu?
You can literally see the dude uploading the next paragraph with a extended blink.
Nice Interview, his voice communicates peace. I listen him while i was doing my stuff. Vibes from the far Perú.
One can write a book for general physics by these subtitles 🔥🔥🔥
fantastic. would be amazing a to make a new version of this in a similar way, with Witten talking about more recent work etc
The problem is, LHC has shown that supersymmetry and string theory is probably wrong. Nevertheless, i respect him very much.
@@lachris8710 yes upon reflecting, I think you are correct this is the problem. Although he is working on other things too like pure Quantum field theories, Chern Simons theory etc, he might be having some bad feelings too of what the sentiment on string theory is currently in the physics community
@@lachris8710 theoretical physicists don't deal with "probablys"
in any case Witten is considered one of if not the greatest mind of our time
@@neonblack211 String theorists don't deal with probablys, because they can not calculate meaningful probabilities from their theory. (-;
@@lachris8710 my point was that theoretical physicists don't stop working on things because it's "probably wrong". If they did we would be missing alot of physics today
Awesome…should be seen by every high school student…so brilliant
1:00:39 - my favorite Witten quote "but we weren't consulted when the Universe was created."
We weren’t consulted when the nose disappeared off the Spinx. When cities where destroyed and all kinds of things done out of opinion. Even today highly educated people can’t gather enough clues to figure it out. So maybe the Babylon clay tablets will leave more to posterity than we do. Your attention is not misplaced with admirable respect
Wonderful content! This is my first stumble upin your channel and I am very impressed by the offerings I see here...thank you!
Hey dude thanks for sharing this, i can listen to this over and come back and slowly make sense of bits and pieces of this crazy world. My mind isn't evolved enough to make sense of the math and with a pollution of information out there it's really refreshing to hear from someone who knows what they are talking about. you coulda used this genius for evil and instead you're helping me make sense of stuff thanks.
Where is this from? Can't find it anywhere else on the Internet. What a gift for you to have shared it, thank you!
starts at 0:22
I need to hear more, the concepts are so mind altering that it’s almost calming.
His father was a physicist..epigenetic’s anyone?
That string theory enables us to unite gravity and QM is in itself a miracle, giving us an insight into the reality that is related to hologram, counting entropy etc. Loss of information in a BH that reappears when the next cycle of CCC is indeed shown by Penrose as indispensable.
What a truly brilliant man.
He doesn’t care if you live or die
@@hosoiarchives4858I don’t think anyone does. Your point?
@@lazarusmagellan2367 I find simping to be astonishing
@@hosoiarchives4858 fellas, is it simping to admire a great mind? this man has intellect most of us will not truly comprehend.
@@lazarusmagellan2367 he believes in the Big Bang and string theory. He’s not that bright
I find it fascinating that time and gravity are related. What stops time in a black hole or why it slows down at the event horizon.
This guy is Awesome. I wish i could under his mind.
Your voice and thought processes soothe
The striking thing is to realise that when Physicists ‘discover’ various particles that super-unify various string theories, these phenomena have all always existed and have been in operation since the dawn of time, we only just became aware - and when i say ‘we’, i mean Tesla, Einstein & Edward Witten, not me and nearly all of you.
I had to pause 1:30 in. Perhaps a better explanation of how speed is additive (at low speeds) would be those moving conveyor belts at airports. When you hop on those, and then walk, when you get to the end you get a wild burst of speed, both speeds added together.
Inertia
His genius is contagious. Light always travels at the same speed cz maybe it travels independent of the geometry of space we're used to? I know gravitational lensing but then there's the doppler effect to counter it at macro level. So why is the universe 'expanding' ?
Dark energy is behind the expansion. Every billion years the size of the observable universe DOUBLES
Because of big bang theory
He Knew things humans doesnt. Enjoy more the life, the moment. Start living.
You have and are the most amazing mind.
Anyone reading this to you I admire your hunger for knowledge as my vibrations become more collective. I’m starting to be able to understand more complex ideas.
take your meds
using medication as a way to insult or belittle someone is not productive or helpful. It's important to respect others' experiences and perspectives, and to avoid making assumptions about their mental state based on their medication use or lack thereof. By learning more about mental health and developing greater empathy and understanding, you can help reduce stigma and discrimination and create a more supportive and compassionate environment for everyone.
I get it, at 38 years old I am still inspired to learn more than ever
Study maths
Yes, to truly understand physics one must learn the prerequisite mathematics and then learn physics within the mathematical context. That said, it is still certainly enlightening to read and listen to physics communicators that transcribe the precise mathematical descriptions of physics into crude english.
Ok, so I get it! "Stuff" is crystalized "spacetime! There you go! I figured it all out! (lol)
See - there is just SO MUCH spacetime, an INFINITE amount, so much of it that there's a tiny bit of "residue" from it all - and that "residue" is "matter"
Schrödinger:
If you ask a physicist what is his idea of yellow light, he will tell you that it is transversal electromagnetic waves of wavelength in the neighborhood of 590 millimicrons. If you ask him: But where does yellow come in? he will say: In my picture not at all, but these kinds of vibrations, when they hit the retina of a healthy eye, give the person whose eye it is the sensation of yellow.
Weyl:
The characteristic of an n-dimensional manifold is that each of the elements composing it (in our examples, single points, [...] colors, tones) may be specified by the giving of n quantities, the "co ordinates," which are continuous functions within the manifold.
EPR:
...every element of the physical reality must have a counterpart in the physical theory.
I AGREE, BUT IT WOULD TAKE A PARTICLE ACCELERATORS THE SIZE OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM TO PROVE OR DISPROVE STRING THEORY.❤
There are other ways quit exaggerating
Hebrews11: 3 "By faith we perceive that the systems of things were put in order by God's word, so thet what is beheld has come to be out of things that do not appear."
Imagine 8B Ed Witten brains on one planet...since there are billions of possibilities for planets like ours...it could exist now...imagine that society, that world...
Yes, he’s like the next jump in human evolution. Most of us are still stupid.
Who’d serve u ur McDonald’s?
@@DonRoyalX A world without McDonald would be a much better place lmao
@@ray_gaming7 lmao true but someone has to be the garbage man u get me
@@DonRoyalX True but garbage man is essential job, mcdonald isnt. And maybe in an intellectually advanced society, all the shitty jobs are done by robots
Think about an explosion creating shockwave through air. If you run toward or away from the explosion, it will take less or more time for that shockwave to reach you. The shockwave moves at the speed of sound and only at the speed of sound. However, photons created in the explosion will reach you in the same exact amount of time regardless of where or how you move. The only thing that changes is the frequency of the light. However, this is only from your perspective. Another observer further away will see the light reach you at different at different times, depending on your motion. This is nearly impossible to detect in ordinary circumstances, but boy, is it weird. What does it mean when two different observers have two different observations of the same reality? This is where I understand the time component comes in, shifting in it's rate, to compensate for the difference between observers?
When was this recorded?
thank you for the upload
Dr Written, I have a question..when you blow a balloon, and when we say that balloon is expanding, then something is expanding it which is air in this case..but when we say that space is expanding..what is expanding it? What is the fabric of space made up of? If the space of fabric is made of something then it means that the big bang is still happening and there is a fundamental energy or force that is pushing everything and creating time as well. If we could figure it out I think we would be able to find different dimensions of time as well.
Space is not made of anything like that but the reason for expansion of space is thought to be dark energy
What he means by space expanding is the space between galaxies
Wow it the 1st person besides myself that has ever mentioned wondering that! If we describe the big bang like an m80 going off, what constitutes the "bang?" From the time it starts till it's no longer seen or heard. So the big bang did not happen 13.8 billion years ago! We are in the midst of it right now. And if time is relative, I believe that when there wasn't a lot going on, B4 novelty, time would have been perceived differently. So I think either there was and is still acceleration, or since time is related to matter and novelty, things we think happened in milliseconds actually took longer but we're thinking of time as linear. What u think? I been thinking about this long time
modern physicists are debating whether it is the negative pressure of dark energy that expands the universe or not or the higgs field or a couple other things but nothing is written in stone so to speak
@39:00 one could equally _legitimately_ say that if your theory requires supersymmetry _and_ extra dimensions for consistency it is a hint telling you your theory is likely wrong and you are not using the correct physical constraints. Is the hint saying your theory is more likely wrong than not? I could not say, I'm "just sayin". The fact a theory has gravitons is a pretty mild favourable result, since gravity occurs in any theory which is generally covariant (respects position and rotation gauge invariance). I think strong theory is the right conceptual idea, but it is not well formulated, and finding alternative extended object models for matter that are minimalist (4D spacetime, no supersymmetry) is something more people should be working on.
Say I’m going the speed of light and hypothetically turned on a flash light, if my eyes were good enough and body resilient enough, would I see the tail end of that beam of light as I chase it? What does it look like to be chasing light at the speed of light?
You can watch simulations of traveling at relativistic speeds and its effect on visual perception on UA-cam.
This comment was a result of marijuana and it’s effects. Do not consume marijuana if under the legal minimum age or illegal in your state.
Well no, why? The closer you go to the speed of light the slower time flows, meaning photons don't actually experience any time at all so if you moved at the speed of light time would stop for you and let's say in 0s an infinite time would pass outside your reference frame. I hope that this helps
Dank,
There is no such thing as 'the speed of light' any more than there is a speed of water, or rocks. There are as many speeds as there are influences on a partical/wave, by a massive object. Eddington proved that.
Leave the flashlight in the glove box-until you get a faster car.
@@kennethclayton1526 lol
Sir, How contact you, I am working in Quantum gravity
Thanks for this brother ❤️🙏love and RESPECT
I put one of this man's talks on yesterday, and _slept like a bloody_ *corpse.*
Havent had sleep that good in a very long time. ❤
I can’t understand what is difference between electric and magnetic fields.
What is the carrier of the magnetic field. And why light is an electromagnetic wave if there are no electrons there
How can it be? voldemort has a channel on youtube
would be nice when the available automatic subtitles would include all spoken languages in the video. is this something that one can configure as creator, or is it solely on youtube? this would be a nice fix!
I came here after knowing he is a Michael Jordan of physics
Is he a physicist or mathmatician. I’m just lost on this
if he’s so smart, why don’t we have a theory of everything yet
You can follow this up with, "why aren't all the smart people hyper wealthy?"
Because they are human. And like all humans, have their own psychology. Which is shaped by genetics and environment (past experiences etc).
I can imagine that the string is a metaphor, but I find it hard to accept that there really are little strings.
Correct! It is a 1 dimensional manifold, though the behavior of an "open" string matches that of a violin string and a "closed" string a rubber band.
The one dimensional generationalization isn't even quite correct, the abstract object is a "brane", a 0 dimensional brane is a point, 1 a string, and 2 a membrane. The beautiful analogy to a musical instrument shouldn't fool you into thinking the behavior of strings is simple, dirichlet branes aka d-branes are crazy weird.
String theory also give weird but brilliant ideas like AdS/CFT correspondance and ER=EPR
Caught some of his stand-up in a Cambridge dive, killer!
Love from India❤️❤️
1:45 is the real peculiarity of the speed of light not that it is independent of its source speed but that it is independent of the observer's speed. Since mechanical waves are independent of their source's speed also.
So has he misspoken here.
I cant believe i'm correcting Ed Witten.
Edit: it's pretty amazing to have a history of physics talk given by such a giant of physics
I came here from j. R. E podcast with eric weinstein.
Same
Same
cringe
@@josipX wtf
Same❤
"Ever learning,yet never coming into the Knowledge of Truth..."
2nd Timothy 3:7
59:10 causes the (expansion) of the universe to accelerate
no, the acceleration is accelerating, how arrogant of you to assume this guy mis spoke
The acceleration of acceleration is called jerk. Jerk is not acceleration the same is displacement isn't velocity.
A TRUE LEGEND!
It's odd that the parts where Witten isn't speaking are in Italian, but Witten's parts aren't subtitled.
Wow! This gentleman is absolutely brilliant!
A atom is to the entire observable universe, as a string is to an atom, so small is a string. And a string is a filament vibrating. But is it possible that a string is just energy vibrating knot’s. And how can the know how small a string is. Is I possible that they are let’s say only 1/1000 of an elementary particles?
47:12 that smile was terrifying
"Our story begins in 6 dimensions"
greatest physicist of this era the modern day einstein
How can you translate the Spanish narratives?????
Gracias 🙏
I've noticed how something loses it's rarity by becoming commercialized..
this is grand admiral thrawn
What is Ed Witten's I.Q?
I don't think anyone has measured his IQ, not like it really matters. IQ is a subjective metric at the end of the day. I would estimate between ~160-180 IQ.
enough to visualize all sorts of weird mathematical things but i dont know what are the metrics of iq test and dont really care
even if some times the rules make now sense they might be the rules after all
We need to get Edward Witten on the Lex Fridman Podcast 👌🏻👍🏻
I've been wanting to see that for so long
Pls don't. Fridman is such a bad interviewer. It'll turn him off from public fame even more.
i lose it every time he makes an expression like he’s suppressing a giggle
Why suddenly UA-cam is pushing this person in the mid of the show ? Do you really believe things happens out of causality ? I think here is a reason and someone who has the power to do it is pushing him in the social media.
I wish someone would post a version of this without the foreign language parts. I’m wearing my fast-forward button out.
when you tell a tv producer to make some elliptical orbits, but their focus is questionable...
Why do tenured professors at MIT hide under their desks when you visit the campus?
It is actually sad that the public learned of Witten only after the JRE Weinstein interview...
The world has many space for sadness
@pipemaze1 does this space resemble strings in 11 dimensions?
He is trying his best to dumb it down. He must think we are all adorable little ants. What a brain.
Wtf are the brown books in the background?
I’m not sure when this was recorded, I would say at least two decades if not 3 to be honest. Eventually the fact that the super large hadron collider did not come up with any single slightest signs of super symmetric particles since then we’ve been left with you know not much in fact. That doesn’t take away the brilliance and sharpness of this guy’s mind to be honest, but fundamentally and I think he knows it we have been wrong and possibly we have been wrong for quite awhile.
I feel you don’t diminish achievement. He is someone idolized by who knows. Some that are here or maybe others that aren’t born yet. Even the courts reverse decision. It’s the way life goes on. My time here has been with a personal positive characteristic regarding the importance of Demi- gods
Thanks
Edward Witten throwing a ball lol
If you take, for example, the periodic table Alpha=Sigma squared, you have the mass of all the gases. 18 times 18 = 324.; X .Z.Y axis is each 108. . You live in the 6th house. 18 in the periodic table.
Does Witten understand the implications of what he says himself?
mind you this is all my opinion and you can discard it as you will but I'm likely never to agree with GR and QM and the consensus scholars likewise me, for I have found no convincing evidence to suggest that spacetime is a real thing beyond a conceptual tool for measurements nor that light is non-mechanical or a wave-particle duality. also, no thing can be a wave-particle duality for this is an irreconcilable contradiction and a lackadaisical description thereof. GR is merely a few presumptive equations conceptualized by observing for example the path in which two celestial sized magnets travel as their fields impress upon each other. the appearance of light curving around massive objects is merely the faraday effect on a grand scale. Gravity also is not the acceleration of mass toward mass along the curve of space time but the acceleration toward a null pressure point between the two fields. light is a field perturbation modality rather than a particle-wave and is in other words a disturbance in the medium in which it travels along, within and cannot escape from. so you need to understand what manifests empty space to know what that medium is.
there is a missing component to the EM and EMR model which is dielectricity and this is that invisible inert energy field that is responsible for the existence of everything in the physical universe. there are only two types of geometry and that is the physical and field geometries. what manifests empty space is magnetism and what manifests electricity and illumination is the impression of the magnetic field upon the dielectric field as the electric field converts into the magnetic and so on. so the dielectric field is inertia and the magnetic field is the loss of that inertia and they necessitate polarity and the electric field is the hybridization of the two which then results in the field perturbation modality that is light. it is typically thought that the electric field and magnetic create each other but this is an incorrect description of the phenomena to justify the idea of light being self propagating or non-mechanical. everything within the physical geometry is light and everything outside of it is of dielectricity. so when the dielectric overcomes the magnetic, light vanishes from the physical universe ie becomes a black hole. the mass maintains but is converted into inert energy and you can no longer see it and these same principles explain atoms and so called subatomic particles.
subatomic particles are essentially descriptions of various modalities of the proton which is electrostatic. this means that atoms are essentially electrostatic dynamos or spherically harmonic manifestations of high energy light. electrons do not exist but are merely units of diectric discharge due to the spherical harmonics of the electrostatic dynamo. all this is a simplified description and explanation of a new unifying model where gravity is merely a modality of magnetism and light is a field perturbation modality of the three fields that are one and necessitate each other's existence(dielectric field, magnetic field, electric field), but to the average human mind this will likely appear as a pile of word salad and excrement, but to a true academic with an open competent faculty of mentation it will prove to be worth investigation and the inevitable truth that persists through scrutiny and lies.
Just seen a comment on string theory and now I can't watch this.
The LHC did not reveal any evidence for super symmetry.
hello and this is Sheldon coopers fun with flags
MAYBE ALBERT EINSTEIN WAS
RIGHT, AND QUANTUM MECHANICS IS NOT THE WHOLE STORY?❤
Bro got a channel?
He would school Michael Jordan
In physics
Lame
For some reasons I just don't like the peculiar string theory including the so-called black hole theory until one day direct proof becomes available.
50:45
This guy seriously needs to donate his sperm. 100 Ed Wittens i believe have the collective power to create a utopia for all.
profound lack of confusion
Honestly, how has Witten helped you on an individual level? Physics is a great subject, but it’s a distraction. And if it’s true that it hasn’t progressed in the last 40 years makes things even more interesting. Anyhow, what the world needs is more people like Linus Pauling. The priorities are soooo off with people. It’s such smoke and mirrors.
Doc,
Marylin (Norma Jean) Monroe understood the power of sex so well, she probably never thought of it. That was in the 50s. Today, she might not get a second look. Same for Liz Taylor.
I like Weinstein's style of intellect. Not that I 'understand' either his, or Witten's genius. But more because I don't enjoy laboring over a technical construct, finally getting the idea (string theory), only to walk away wondering, 'What is it?'
Even Witten says, 'We have five pieces, and another smaller part.
Maybe that smaller part is what makes it 'super string theory', and that makes it worth the Fields Medal.
'Norma Jean' probably knows, but doesn't think about it.
Wasn't Einstein's calculus a _response_ to the findings of Michelson & Morley ?