I have been doing it all with my Tittle 36! 3D, 2 TAC events, indoor, and hunting multiple states. This bow isn’t going anywhere for a long, long time.
Hey bro I just shot that bow the 35 and I shot the 35 Elite exalt long draw which I would have to get the regular draw version but I shot both of them and they are freaking amazing there's a little bit more hand shock in the sequel than there is in the elite but they both shot amazing no great big dump into the back wall no huge Valley at this point A to point B draw the boat back and comes back super smooth
Man I. was thinking the exact same thing. What else does this side load affect besides cam lean? And how long before limbs start to fail from the added stress?
just a question about the new tuning system as far as us at home do it ourselfers, If the cam is "slaved" to the left limb (for a right handed bow) how does a complete string change work with this new system? I guess to me if it's slaved as was stated and is geared for turns with an alan wrench, how does the axle come out? Vid on that would be great for us tuner/tinkerers
"Best crossover bow" ...Mathews removes the quiver holes from the TRX 34... Sorry but this doesn't fit in the same league as the Shootdown Pro, Exalt 35, Highline or the Departure Pro which are true crossoves between target/3D7hunting...
@@DBZSTAY TS boted to the tiny screws holes of the sight can't compare to having a two pieced quiver bolted to the riser is the way as the Low Pro or the Supertilte in other brands... The bow already has the highest MSRP in the entire line and they don't even bother to CNC two holes for a quiver system? Come on, that's not a crossover, is a money grabbing disgrace...
@MFJJ; this might be covered elsewhere but as an EU res why are you allowed to ship Titles but not Lifts? There is only target shooting here so I'm not in need of a Lift but I'm curious.
Hunting bows are what keeps the US manufacturers in business for compound. Almost no shops in the US will stock a target bow so manufacturers started allowing shipping for target bows. For hunting they want to make sure you visit your local shop hence the ban on shipping their hunting bows.
Most money is made on hunting in the US. Having dealer only products helps keep the pro shops alive. People have to go into dealers to buy. Target is all but an off season byproduct of archery hunting in the US. Unless you're diehard archery, most Americans don't even understand it outside hunting.
I hoping you do a comparison with all the long hunting bows. Like the Title 35 and Bowtech 34 or 35 this years and PSE Mach 35 Darton 35 and compare there speeds and groups at 60 to 100 see which ones shoot the best. Im hoping you add the full draw brace height to your measurements please and measure groups at 50 yards with all bow reviews to see which bow performs
@@joshfredrickson6224 You measure from the "load out point", as this is the dynamic brace height at full draw. PSE's "Full Draw Stability System" is specifically marketed to change the dynamic brace height and improve accuracy (as an example). Bow manufacturers can alter the dynamic brace height by tinkering with the limb angle and deflection, combined with the cam design.
@@ApexArchery This is the first I've ever heard of this. Maybe I don't understand, but if you're measuring the brace height at full draw instead of static, then any bow with a more upright limb at rest will have a longer dynamic brace height than when it is at rest. I don't think I'm completely understanding what advantage you get from just measuring the brace height at draw.
Question/video idea for you! Could you do a speed comparison of different bows at shorter draws? Like around 26 inches? I'd be curious which bows are more efficient as their draw length goes down, as well as if bows designed for shorter archers are actually more efficient.
Insane price aside it's a nice bow. It's a pure target bow though - not a crossover like the Sequel 35 or Exalt. I guessing there will be a bunch of TRX 34s for sale.........
“possibly the best crossover bow ever”, REALLY WOW ,, sounds like a Mathews marketing rep. There seems to be many many questions and issues with this design. Time will tell if Mathews will need to send out another letter this year . What will MFJJ say then about his beloved Lift X!!
Noice,, right Meowwww, those snozzburries taste better when shooting a Mathews,,, lol 😮😂😅 keep up the good work jj,, and the good T-Shirts , was looking at the new lift X but now thinking the building out a BeefCake Title like crazy and rock that…!!!🎉
Why on earth do they not have shorter (< 24.5") draw length mod options on this bow? I know a couple of female archers and some juniors in my local club with draw lengths in the 23-24" range. Ironically one of them is using a TRX 34 at 23.5" draw. The Title 34 would have been perfect for them otherwise. Just seems weird that they are making a 34" version with a shortest draw being only 0.5" less than shortest draw on their 36" version?!
@dakotaburnette5353 I hear ya call me a snob I just really like running the mathews accessories and the idea of low pro quiver on a 34 sounded intriguing
Great bows but they need an option for higher letoff and more valley. These cams are set to go. Some of us like this platform but we’re carrying old shoulders 😂
When will Mathews catch up to others with a smooth draw cycle? Their hump at the end is terrible. I might consider a Mathew’s if that jump wasn’t so bad on their draw
Bro I just watched your video on TV I love you to death but you sound crazy on some of this stuff everybody should care about draw length if a boat is a half an inch past spec that's a problem I'm thankful that their new 34 tilt is dead on that is amazing first time ever in Mathews is really starting to not just slap the same cam limbs on a little bit different of a riser they have switched it up I completely agree but the fact of the matter is if I'm standing shooting my bow and I don't like the way it feels with a BowTech I can move the draw stop just a little bit and get more let off I can move it forward back I can adjust the drawings quarter inch half inch at a time you know there's so much to the way of both feels and what sucks is Matthew's only does modules that's my biggest complaint ever and I know that people say it's about efficiency okay I would rather lose a little bit of efficiency and gain the feel that I want to feel when I pull that bow when I'm sitting in the valley when I'm at the back wall everything maybe this new 34 tilt is like going to be lights out but they lose a lot of people I believe when it comes to draw length and the non-adjusted ability and not just that I feel like a lot of Matthews is a lot of Fanboy stuff anymore they bought out pretty much the 3D realm and yeah they got good bows but they pay the most you know what I mean let's just be real that's the reason why they got Levi and Danny otherwise don't you think they would go somewhere else 100% if there was more money you know and you got to really think about that a lot of people are turning into straight Fanboys because they make so much money off these Mathews Bows and like pushing them so hard that they're not realizing there's other bows out there that go past Matthews
@@joshfredrickson6224 it feels really weird to me at full draw. I’m not good at describing it, but when shooting with my hinge it feels like I have to put a lot more into it to go off, and just isn’t comfortable for me at full draw. The title 38 is great, but I think it’s just a little bit big for a bow hunting bow for me. 36 would be on the upper edge. 34 would be great too. I really like how the ExaltLD and Darton Sequel 35 feel at full draw. Just waiting for bowtech, and I’ll be making a decision soon.
I don't know why Mathews got caught up in the parallel limb concept on their hunting bows. In my opinion, bows with upright limbs are much more forgiving and typically have a more stable back wall. I think the only benefit is less vibration. With parallel limbs they really dump into the back wall and feel kind of floppy based on their tension, whereas upright limbs hold much better on target and have a much more stable valley and back wall. Typically less reflex as well.
Also, with a 33.5" riser on my 33"ATA bow it holds super well, also it is lighter than most aluminums at that length so I can put the weight where I want.
@@Kgsoloman-ou6wm Alot of the opinions you've stated have otherwise been disputed. Also, if you didn't want someone to comment and challenge your viewpoint then why would you even comment?
@@joshfredrickson6224 How have they been disputed? Every single target bow is exactly how I described. You think that's for looks? I'm not going to argue with someone on youtube based on their opinions when they likely don't even work on their own bow. All the weight in the front of the draw cycle causes exactly what I explained. A large dump into the back wall that's super jumpy. It's how mathews have been since the switchweight cams. The same reason when you come to full draw the bow twiches left and right. You are not educated or experienced enough for your opinion to matter, because if you were, you would be at my conclusion. Keep fighting, though.
Why did Mathews not get the Title 34 or even the Title 36 to get out to a 31” draw? I’d have to get a Title 38 if I wanted a Mathews that would have a good enough string angle to get the string to my nose.
License and registration, CHICKEN FUCKER! Keep up all the bow reviews man, awesome that you get these all out to us so quickly, I watch all of them, thank you 🫡
I have been doing it all with my Tittle 36! 3D, 2 TAC events, indoor, and hunting multiple states. This bow isn’t going anywhere for a long, long time.
Darton Sequel 35 would be the ultimate all around bow.
Agreed. Plus the option for 80lb peak. Cant beat it for an all around bow
Wish it had an inline sight option but that's minor.
Hey bro I just shot that bow the 35 and I shot the 35 Elite exalt long draw which I would have to get the regular draw version but I shot both of them and they are freaking amazing there's a little bit more hand shock in the sequel than there is in the elite but they both shot amazing no great big dump into the back wall no huge Valley at this point A to point B draw the boat back and comes back super smooth
Besides it being a darton 👎🏽
@@KodaCutler ...what's wrong with that?
What kind of stress does this add to the limb? The limb is fixed to the pocket so moving one end will add pressure and stress to the limb.
Man I. was thinking the exact same thing. What else does this side load affect besides cam lean? And how long before limbs start to fail from the added stress?
Again… why do we test the Mathew’s at the faster letoff and Hoyt at 85% and Elite at 90%?
Is that how Elite comes stock?
because it's technically a target bow and that's how they usually ship.
just a question about the new tuning system as far as us at home do it ourselfers, If the cam is "slaved" to the left limb (for a right handed bow) how does a complete string change work with this new system? I guess to me if it's slaved as was stated and is geared for turns with an alan wrench, how does the axle come out? Vid on that would be great for us tuner/tinkerers
Axle doesn’t need to come out
@@jasonnester9514false. On all the newer mathews (including this years bows) you have to pull the axles to remove the cables fully.
@ ohhhhhhh well that’s a bummer
I’ve had enuff of Mathews for the next five years.
No one else getting this much hype. None are even getting any coverage
@ I’m almost positive he’s been bought now.
@@paulheberling2750 it’s just through inventory and sales. Still honest, albeit ignoring the other brands that deserve the coverage
@ yes, like APA
I feel like darton doesn't get enough attention.
Thanks for advocating for local pro shops! As a bow tech at one of those, we appreciate it!
Man I wish this had quiver mounts and 80lbs and this would then be my new bow!
Just get the lift 33 or the Atlus it's 34 3/4 axle to axle but 31 to 34 in draw lenghth
So when’s the Mathews tattoo coming
Mathews sellout!
MFJJ can you elaborate on how moving the limbs would affect the stress on them? Seems like adding unequal stress?
I believe the movie you referenced is supertroopers. Right meow. Really enjoy your content, man.
"Best crossover bow" ...Mathews removes the quiver holes from the TRX 34... Sorry but this doesn't fit in the same league as the Shootdown Pro, Exalt 35, Highline or the Departure Pro which are true crossoves between target/3D7hunting...
I mean u can still use a tight spot so wats the problem
Could use a quivalizer
Or just use a quiver in your pack.. Not the end of the world..When I whitetail hunt tree stand/shooting house/ ground blind I pull my quiver off..
@@DBZSTAY TS boted to the tiny screws holes of the sight can't compare to having a two pieced quiver bolted to the riser is the way as the Low Pro or the Supertilte in other brands... The bow already has the highest MSRP in the entire line and they don't even bother to CNC two holes for a quiver system? Come on, that's not a crossover, is a money grabbing disgrace...
Mathews paid for mfjj to go on hunt. He kiss mathews ass
Need a sequel 31 ST2 review
Why is the cable guard so far away from the riser? Looks funky...
@MFJJ; this might be covered elsewhere but as an EU res why are you allowed to ship Titles but not Lifts? There is only target shooting here so I'm not in need of a Lift but I'm curious.
Hunting bows are what keeps the US manufacturers in business for compound. Almost no shops in the US will stock a target bow so manufacturers started allowing shipping for target bows.
For hunting they want to make sure you visit your local shop hence the ban on shipping their hunting bows.
Most money is made on hunting in the US. Having dealer only products helps keep the pro shops alive. People have to go into dealers to buy.
Target is all but an off season byproduct of archery hunting in the US. Unless you're diehard archery, most Americans don't even understand it outside hunting.
How does the draw cycle compare to the Lift X 33
When are you going to review the Prüf sight by dialed archery
I hoping you do a comparison with all the long hunting bows. Like the Title 35 and Bowtech 34 or 35 this years and PSE Mach 35 Darton 35 and compare there speeds and groups at 60 to 100 see which ones shoot the best. Im hoping you add the full draw brace height to your measurements please and measure groups at 50 yards with all bow reviews to see which bow performs
Well, there isn't a Title 35, the longest hunting bow Mathews offers is 33.
Also, How the heck do you measure brace height at full draw?
@@joshfredrickson6224 You measure from the "load out point", as this is the dynamic brace height at full draw. PSE's "Full Draw Stability System" is specifically marketed to change the dynamic brace height and improve accuracy (as an example). Bow manufacturers can alter the dynamic brace height by tinkering with the limb angle and deflection, combined with the cam design.
@@ApexArchery This is the first I've ever heard of this. Maybe I don't understand, but if you're measuring the brace height at full draw instead of static, then any bow with a more upright limb at rest will have a longer dynamic brace height than when it is at rest. I don't think I'm completely understanding what advantage you get from just measuring the brace height at draw.
Question/video idea for you! Could you do a speed comparison of different bows at shorter draws? Like around 26 inches? I'd be curious which bows are more efficient as their draw length goes down, as well as if bows designed for shorter archers are actually more efficient.
Can you adjust the draw length can you adjust the let off without a module
Hell no, Mathews wants all your money and will make you buy an expensive mod for each draw length and letoff
Should weight on target bows get rated on the same scale as hunting?
No 70V mod yet, the V meant it had a valley unlike the standard 70 mod on the TRX. Title still just has the 70 mod with no valley.
Confirmed MfJJ is definitely a Mathews fanboy, Stickers on his truck I bet 😂
STP shirt goes hard
Greatest movie ever. . . . . SUPER TROOPERS! I love MFJJ more now
Insane price aside it's a nice bow. It's a pure target bow though - not a crossover like the Sequel 35 or Exalt. I guessing there will be a bunch of TRX 34s for sale.........
Always good info on these videos. MFJJ your all jacked up on mountain dew for this one man hahaha
So pumped for this bow
Absolutely some of the best information on the web right here. Thanks MFJJ
“possibly the best crossover bow ever”, REALLY WOW ,, sounds like a Mathews marketing rep. There seems to be many many questions and issues with this design. Time will tell if Mathews will need to send out another letter this year . What will MFJJ say then about his beloved Lift X!!
Noice,, right Meowwww, those snozzburries taste better when shooting a Mathews,,, lol 😮😂😅 keep up the good work jj,, and the good T-Shirts , was looking at the new lift X but now thinking the building out a BeefCake Title like crazy and rock that…!!!🎉
Why on earth do they not have shorter (< 24.5") draw length mod options on this bow? I know a couple of female archers and some juniors in my local club with draw lengths in the 23-24" range. Ironically one of them is using a TRX 34 at 23.5" draw. The Title 34 would have been perfect for them otherwise. Just seems weird that they are making a 34" version with a shortest draw being only 0.5" less than shortest draw on their 36" version?!
Whooops…. At .43 seconds you said drive the cam left or right…
Like my trx 34 that title 34 is going to be a killer setup, no quiver cut out is kind of a bummer
Run a bridge lock and bolt on to the site mount for the quiver.
@dakotaburnette5353 I hear ya call me a snob I just really like running the mathews accessories and the idea of low pro quiver on a 34 sounded intriguing
Black is the only hunting color?
Oh it’s a Mathew as he only said it is a Title for the first 3 minutes 😊
Super trooper
Without quiver mount is a no no for hunting. TRX34 had that, oh come on Mathews...
I know you can’t ship hunting bows but why is it that you can ship a Mathews target bow but not a Mathews hunting bow what’s the difference
Great bows but they need an option for higher letoff and more valley. These cams are set to go. Some of us like this platform but we’re carrying old shoulders 😂
When will Mathews catch up to others with a smooth draw cycle? Their hump at the end is terrible. I might consider a Mathew’s if that jump wasn’t so bad on their draw
Expensive bow
Bro I just watched your video on TV I love you to death but you sound crazy on some of this stuff everybody should care about draw length if a boat is a half an inch past spec that's a problem I'm thankful that their new 34 tilt is dead on that is amazing first time ever in Mathews is really starting to not just slap the same cam limbs on a little bit different of a riser they have switched it up I completely agree but the fact of the matter is if I'm standing shooting my bow and I don't like the way it feels with a BowTech I can move the draw stop just a little bit and get more let off I can move it forward back I can adjust the drawings quarter inch half inch at a time you know there's so much to the way of both feels and what sucks is Matthew's only does modules that's my biggest complaint ever and I know that people say it's about efficiency okay I would rather lose a little bit of efficiency and gain the feel that I want to feel when I pull that bow when I'm sitting in the valley when I'm at the back wall everything maybe this new 34 tilt is like going to be lights out but they lose a lot of people I believe when it comes to draw length and the non-adjusted ability and not just that I feel like a lot of Matthews is a lot of Fanboy stuff anymore they bought out pretty much the 3D realm and yeah they got good bows but they pay the most you know what I mean let's just be real that's the reason why they got Levi and Danny otherwise don't you think they would go somewhere else 100% if there was more money you know and you got to really think about that a lot of people are turning into straight Fanboys because they make so much money off these Mathews Bows and like pushing them so hard that they're not realizing there's other bows out there that go past Matthews
Darton 35 beats the brakes off this bow.
7:38 Cartman from southpark?
The drill hanging on the bow press is the absolute worst part of this video.
I know the 70v mod is slower on the C3x cam, not sure about the SWT system though
The title 36 would have been perfect for me… except my draw length is 31”. So instead I’m just sad.
get the Title 38....
Or the LiftX 33
@@joshfredrickson6224 I don’t particularly like the lift, will likely be getting the ExaltLD or Darton sequel 35.
@@gavinatkins2671 What do you not like about the Lift? Honestly just curious
@@joshfredrickson6224 it feels really weird to me at full draw. I’m not good at describing it, but when shooting with my hinge it feels like I have to put a lot more into it to go off, and just isn’t comfortable for me at full draw.
The title 38 is great, but I think it’s just a little bit big for a bow hunting bow for me. 36 would be on the upper edge. 34 would be great too.
I really like how the ExaltLD and Darton Sequel 35 feel at full draw. Just waiting for bowtech, and I’ll be making a decision soon.
I don't know why Mathews got caught up in the parallel limb concept on their hunting bows. In my opinion, bows with upright limbs are much more forgiving and typically have a more stable back wall. I think the only benefit is less vibration.
With parallel limbs they really dump into the back wall and feel kind of floppy based on their tension, whereas upright limbs hold much better on target and have a much more stable valley and back wall. Typically less reflex as well.
You should rethink your statement. They have very little dump in the back wall, all of the weight is in the front of the draw cycle. I own one.
Also, with a 33.5" riser on my 33"ATA bow it holds super well, also it is lighter than most aluminums at that length so I can put the weight where I want.
@@joshfredrickson6224Do you hear yourself? You’re arguing with me on opinions. If you’re content you dont need to explain yourself.
@@Kgsoloman-ou6wm Alot of the opinions you've stated have otherwise been disputed. Also, if you didn't want someone to comment and challenge your viewpoint then why would you even comment?
@@joshfredrickson6224 How have they been disputed? Every single target bow is exactly how I described. You think that's for looks? I'm not going to argue with someone on youtube based on their opinions when they likely don't even work on their own bow. All the weight in the front of the draw cycle causes exactly what I explained. A large dump into the back wall that's super jumpy. It's how mathews have been since the switchweight cams. The same reason when you come to full draw the bow twiches left and right. You are not educated or experienced enough for your opinion to matter, because if you were, you would be at my conclusion. Keep fighting, though.
🏆
Tender cats go 😅
Why did Mathews not get the Title 34 or even the Title 36 to get out to a 31” draw?
I’d have to get a Title 38 if I wanted a Mathews that would have a good enough string angle to get the string to my nose.
What's your draw length?
@ 31” at the shortest I can comfortably shoot but usually closer to 31.5”
@@derickprice8996 I didn't realize that the 34 and 36 were so short in the draw ranges. I would assume it has to do with the cam technology.
Super Troopers Meow.
You should’ve seen all the crybabies crying about your podcast clip someone posted in the PSE archery talk Facebook group. It was epic🤣
Highly caffeinated Josh is my favourite 😂
$2000 is in line when you take in consideration a sight cost $700
License and registration, CHICKEN FUCKER! Keep up all the bow reviews man, awesome that you get these all out to us so quickly, I watch all of them, thank you 🫡