1901 Brand New Wind Turbine Design For Camper Vans, Boats And Roof Ridges

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 974

  • @toml.8210
    @toml.8210 Рік тому +116

    Would you mind adding a few marks to the magnet wheel, so we can tell if it's turning? A Dark Sharpie or a paint pen should be enough. You could then use a tachymeter to measure the RPMs.

    • @amvkarthik
      @amvkarthik Рік тому +9

      Would appreciate testing it with a bldc motor and check it's real energy value.

    • @hendrikjbboss9973
      @hendrikjbboss9973 Рік тому +6

      Well, I can see that it is turning, and quite fast at that. 😊

    • @nickybeingnicky
      @nickybeingnicky Рік тому +8

      @@hendrikjbboss9973 that doesn't give us accurate measurements though....

    • @davebean2886
      @davebean2886 Рік тому +8

      A mark is a great suggestion.

    • @alanhat5252
      @alanhat5252 Рік тому +2

      videos aren't good at capturing rotation because they're 25 still images per second. They will always give an unrepresentative view & at certain speeds will show a rotating object as motionless. Much better is some sort of gauge. A simple analogue gauge is a magnet in an aluminium cup, one part rotates with the mechanism & the other holds a pointer & acts against a spring, the eddy currents in the cup drag the magnet. It works with either part rotating.

  • @BenEBrady
    @BenEBrady Рік тому +34

    Howdy from Central Texas, Robert. I stumbled across your channel at about 4:30 AM and its now 8:15 AM. I've thoroughly enjoyed your videos and I have to say this has been a most educational experience. I'm fascinated by your boat turbine idea and the possibilities for mounting it on the roof to charge batteries. I've got several 3D printers and now you've given me something useful to print. Most of my friends print silly superhero figurines that sit on the shelf and collect dust. I'd much rather print useful, functional things. Thank you for your inspirational and very entertaining, educational videos. I'll be looking forward to seeing what other brilliant ideas you publish.

    • @rittzbyitch3682
      @rittzbyitch3682 Рік тому +2

      Try printing his stuff and make improvements here and there and report back please. Do Mr. Robert and all of us a solid!

  • @bar1066
    @bar1066 Рік тому +60

    I love your enthusiasm when you explain these concepts. The concepts send my limited grey matter off on a journey every time.👍

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +11

      Awesome! Thank you!

    • @TheClembo
      @TheClembo Рік тому +4

      @@G58 Well said that man, cheers and thanks.

    • @G58
      @G58 Рік тому +2

      @@TheClembo Thank you. 12 months ago my comment would have been deleted! Progress?

    • @timwoodger7896
      @timwoodger7896 Рік тому +3

      @@G58 you articulated that superbly!
      I 100% agree 👍👍

    • @G58
      @G58 Рік тому +3

      @@timwoodger7896 Thank you for your kind words. After six and a half decades on this spinning ball, I finally feel like I understand what’s really going on.
      Peace

  • @jamesconorobrien5449
    @jamesconorobrien5449 Рік тому +8

    This episode is the very reason I've been waking up each morning and turning on Rob and looking for an integrated wind turbine for a boat. All it needs now is a collapsible set of funnels so the boat doesn't blow over in a cross wind, a venturi tube to maximize the power output of an Archimedes generator which is connected to a sand battery which runs a Sterling engine which pushes a Sharrow Propeller - and when that happens I won't need to get out of bed in the morning. Thanks Rob, you stick in there - you're almost there!
    Also we do need some statistics on the power, the Amperage and the wind velocity.

  • @FOSS365
    @FOSS365 Рік тому +31

    Love the design. I may never actually try to build anything on your site, but I enjoy the enthusiasm you have in every video! I almost always dislike the "curb" appeal to wind generation, but I think you could use this design up the corner of a home and it would look amazing!

    • @DUKE_of_RAMBLE
      @DUKE_of_RAMBLE Рік тому +9

      Down here in the southern US states (specifically, "the south"), everyone loves their pillars/columns. They'd do great on there. Same for classical courthouses!
      Although, I don't expect them to be adopted, in *_either_* case. 😕
      Still, I like your idea with stylizing ones home using them.
      Functionally speaking, in terms of maintaining ease of construction of homes, I think just having a 1yd/1m stack hanging under each corner if the roof, would work well! All the wiring can be easily plumbed up through the roof then, and into the house. Mounting hardware consisting of only a bearing block bolted under the eave, and an L-type bracket with a bearing for the bottom.

  • @markbowen6493
    @markbowen6493 Рік тому +7

    Nice idea. I recommend an exhaust horn that mounts over the turbine outlet that is slightly flared and exits down wind. It would be interesting to see how much torque is generated when a load is applied (watts).

  • @hewyn1
    @hewyn1 Рік тому +2

    I’ve been watching Robert for weeks and thinking “hmmm, how do I translate this to a boat,’ and then “Ta-dahhhhh!” He goes and does it for me. Cheers bwtt!!

  • @Moist_yet_Crispy
    @Moist_yet_Crispy Рік тому +5

    I love seeing all of these different designs! Eager to start building and testing them but that won't be for some time still. Still, grateful for the enthusiasm and motivation I find here.

  • @stevevenus1
    @stevevenus1 Рік тому +5

    It's great. Love to see a full size operational one to see what it can really do integrated into commercial or residential properties.

  • @mrpants8976
    @mrpants8976 Рік тому +16

    That looks like it would do wonders for boats, only thing I think people would complain about is you did not show the power output, but with as simple of a design you have, anyone should be able to replicate it and test it on their own

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +5

      my thoughts exactly mate

    • @markseamans4682
      @markseamans4682 Рік тому +2

      @@ThinkingandTinkering I'm pretty sure this is a series....be patient.

    • @ogi22
      @ogi22 Рік тому +2

      @@markseamans4682 Well, you can call it "a series". Those are building blocks and Robert explained this a few times in his clips. It's like a Lego for a bit bigger kids😁
      This part is about catching wind.
      You can find a part about different ways of forcing wind to move something.
      Then there is a part about how to change that move into electricity.
      When you put everything together, you will make a wind generator. But you will remember it has different parts and understanding how they work will help you to slap one together just for your specific needs.
      It's similar to one bushcraft rule told by Mr. Mors Kochansky: the more you know, the less you carry.
      And Robert is giving this knowledge here. With a big smile and enthusiasm😃

  • @clinturbanek6794
    @clinturbanek6794 Рік тому +16

    I love your idea of putting the moving parts on the bottom (ground level) for easier maintenance. I assume you could switch it back and put the moving parts on top (surface) for the ocean. Catch waves coming in and the current going back out. Heck, maybe even one structure in the ocean. Half below the water directing wave energy up and a tower above the water directing wind energy down. All maintenance done at the surface.

    • @donnievance1942
      @donnievance1942 Рік тому

      You don't want the device in the water, creating drag on the boat. Having it in the air on the boat's topsides does create a little bit of air drag, but this is trivial. Every sailboat has quite a bit of counter-productive surface exposed to the wind anyway.

  • @AndyJenkins999
    @AndyJenkins999 Рік тому +13

    Interesting Rob thank you. I live on a Narrowboat in an extremely windy marina and have a heavily modified Ender 3 and lots of filament to use up so am now inspired by your video to do some experiments.

  • @JSabh
    @JSabh Рік тому +50

    Brilliant, very cool Rob. I lived on a sailboat for several years and often thought about wind turbines being the thing was wind powered anyway lol. I can see the entire mast being replaced with that and a generator powering a motor driving the boat just the same as it already operates. Solar wind is so fascinating. Also could fit several solar panels for non wind days and sail that way. I am thinking a folding mast/turbine tower for low wind days.

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +9

      nice mate

    • @iamkian
      @iamkian Рік тому +4

      The boat next to you (when moored in a harbor) will not like the noise of the turbine!

    • @JoanOfArgghh
      @JoanOfArgghh Рік тому +5

      @@iamkian I never liked the noise of the wind propeller blades next to my boat, either.

    • @drillerdev4624
      @drillerdev4624 Рік тому +2

      ​@@ThinkingandTinkering that'd be FIRST mate :p

    • @JSabh
      @JSabh Рік тому +3

      @@iamkian yeah, I don't like the smell of diesel so I reckon we would be equal lol. Besides, in port it would fold and be silent anyway. Most ports have bridges that require lifting to pass with a sailboat so the mast aka turbine would be folded.

  • @doracotterell2863
    @doracotterell2863 Рік тому +4

    I, for one, absolutely LOVE the authenticity of this man’s personality. If I lived in his neighbourhood - I’d definitely
    love to see first hand how this turbine works on a boat.
    First time viewer & just subscribed. Thank you sir.

  • @401ksolar
    @401ksolar Рік тому +15

    Yes this looks like a definite Improvement to the 4-ft wide 30 ft tall wind turbine Tower that was on one of Jacques cousteau's research vessels in the 70s, as I understand it somebody scrapped that boat out in Oregon and place the turbine in the air to power their house, I recall commenting about this around the time you were doing squirrel cage rotors, with the kind of rotating cowling that you are looking at I think you will achieve very good power levels

  • @DBRGB
    @DBRGB 7 місяців тому

    Have watched many of your videos and have to say, genius!!!!! I love the content and delivery every time. Your enthusiasm is contagious. Thank you and please, keep it just so honest!!!!

  • @johnlshilling1446
    @johnlshilling1446 Рік тому +14

    Uuuhhh... It spins! It spins fast!
    But! But! But! --- There isn't any load. How does it perform when completed; including a generator?

    • @monnoo8221
      @monnoo8221 Рік тому +2

      The expectable load is proportional to the air friction on the surface of the cones. That friction is proportional to the speed of the air, the radius of the cones and c. While the thingy accelerates the air, it does so most in the center where the radius is small, and the cones are smooth... Hence the power output will be pretty small: I agree

    • @cwhyles
      @cwhyles Рік тому +7

      It just isn’t going to work to a useful extent. You are quite correct that as soon as a load is added in the form of the coils and an electrical load, it will probably slow or stop. The biggest problem I see, and I might have said this before on another of his videos, is that it is far too small to collect any useful energy from the wind. Just because it turns at this scale isn’t enough. The power available is proportional to the surface area that the impeller in this case presents. All the funnelling means nothing. And you can’t get something from nothing.

  • @MerwinARTist
    @MerwinARTist Рік тому +10

    Well done Robert .. great design idea!! Love watching this develop!

  • @ashleygriffin3489
    @ashleygriffin3489 Рік тому +1

    Very Inspiring. I have been very interested in renewables, especially in turbines. You videos break it down to make learning very easy.

  • @neildee9834
    @neildee9834 Рік тому +18

    Awesome. Love the concept. Looking at the strength of the wind you were in it could well be more productive than blades (as well as safer).
    Probably a lot quieter too, which would lend well to boat roofs.
    I'd love to see a finished unit with power output numbers.
    Well done!

    • @BenEehayeh
      @BenEehayeh Рік тому +1

      Propeller blades are inefficient.
      The area of force is much greater than the area of the blades.
      If the blades had a larger surface area they could convert more energy from the wind.

    • @robertjung8929
      @robertjung8929 Рік тому +1

      @@BenEehayeh wind turbines can extract up to 50% of energy from the wind, following your logic the blades should cover 50% of the swept area , but they not. btw... did you know the wind turbine is not "pushed" around by the wind force but rather "pulled" around by aerodynamic lift of the blades generated by the blowing wind ? so this concept turbine of Robert will not increase efficiency (it might actually decrease it due to friction loses while redirecting the flow), but it will transform the "dynamic" swept area with flying blades into a "static" swept area with no moving parts (hence safer). i think it's a neat idea definitely worth of investigating, but i don't think it's anything revolutionary :)

    • @BenEehayeh
      @BenEehayeh Рік тому +1

      @@robertjung8929 What is the cut in speed for propeller blades?
      8-10 miles per hour winds.
      Non-propeller designs, like the helical DNA shaped blades, begin to rotate in 3 mile per hour winds.
      Helical wind turbines have been in use in Europe for 20+ years.

    • @robertjung8929
      @robertjung8929 Рік тому

      @@BenEehayeh where in europe exactly ? i live in europe and all big wind turbine farms i seen are using conventional blades.

    • @BenEehayeh
      @BenEehayeh Рік тому

      @@robertjung8929 Finland.

  • @promess
    @promess Рік тому +18

    You know what'd be interesting? You had one design where you the funnels pointing down to direct wind and catch it. One of the renewable ways to cool your home off is to have a big set of pipes underground that cools the air... I wonder if this could be placed over the inlet as a generative force and something to help move the air? I don't know how much force it creates, if the run would be too long would it stagnate and stop moving the air? I kinda want to build one of the larger ones now to do some home tests! :D thanks for the content!

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +4

      i don't know mate - try it and see

    • @martinsmallridge4025
      @martinsmallridge4025 Рік тому +2

      Might a second unit at the outlet work to act as a pulling force draw air out of such a system too. Albeit, you’d want to find a way to draw other ambient and outlet air together. Hmm… ponderings

    • @nevyngould1744
      @nevyngould1744 Рік тому +2

      ​​@@martinsmallridge4025 a second unit mounted higher than the inlet and inverted would. Wind In at the sides then directed up and out would likely generate a low pressure area centred
      below it in the pipe. Unless my mind is wandering.

    • @kooskroos
      @kooskroos Рік тому +2

      Went it rains it can also spin the rotor on water power. Genius Robert!

    • @Chimel31
      @Chimel31 Рік тому +1

      Agree, although both directions are useful: cool outside air inwards, or warm inside air outwards.
      More importantly, the mechanical movement can power a coffee burr grinder! 😄

  • @srsherman7
    @srsherman7 Рік тому +9

    Robert, you need a lavalier mic..i love listening to you explain things and it would be easier to hear you while in the shop with a lavalier mic

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому

      cheers mate

    • @YoureNowOnTV
      @YoureNowOnTV Рік тому

      I agree. A lavalier mic for $2 and a long extension cord to the Zoom sound recorder, camera or pc, would change things dramatically. The message in the video's is getting through but a better mic position would make a big difference.

    • @bounzig
      @bounzig Рік тому

      I agree, I use the subtitles but I don't know how accurate they are lol. Cheers mate, a real mic would be appreciated :)

  • @pootmahgoots8482
    @pootmahgoots8482 Рік тому

    Ok that's really cool. You could stack these and have them spin each other in a daisy chain, and just have one opened at the top to take the air in and spin, feeding air down into the others. This is such a neat concept!!!

  • @handyhippie6548
    @handyhippie6548 Рік тому

    i ask you for a turbine genny design for my camper and lo and behold, two weeks later you come up with one. how's that for service with a smile? forget about a day, you've made my year! thank you from the bottom of my little black heart!

  • @ant-rg
    @ant-rg Рік тому +23

    Enjoying the content and the way it's all so easy to create and understand. I get the use of 3D printers is also increasing in popularity, but for those of us without one, converting every day items to do the same thing would be interesting. Maybe the use of sport / training cones (which are similar in shape and size to your printed cones) may be a adaption worth considering.

    • @lucasballek
      @lucasballek Рік тому +2

      Most moderate-sized cities will have labs that you can rent a 3D printer for super cheap

    • @sailorstu
      @sailorstu Рік тому +1

      Hi Roy,
      I tend to agree with you.
      I am thinking, since I am in a boat yard at the moment, with several people interested in clean energy I will be talking with a few others about a group buy.
      You may be able to arrange the same thing in your area.

    • @jesse_ronan
      @jesse_ronan Рік тому +3

      some libraries have access to 3D printers as well

    • @redyredfern2276
      @redyredfern2276 Рік тому +1

      Traffic cone for a bigger one

  • @Nailnuke
    @Nailnuke Рік тому +19

    Hmmm. The power from a conventional propeller is generated at the tips which in turn produces leverage, which is why the larger the propeller diameter (think wind farm) the greater the power. This turbine is too small, as soon as you add coils to produce a voltage, then attach a load, you generate electromagnetic breaking. There won't be enough leverage to overcome this unwanted effect. The whole thing would need to be much larger, including the turbine.

    • @warrenelliott4555
      @warrenelliott4555 Рік тому +2

      I agree, the effort to produce ant dereee of electrical energy would be so tiny it is useless unless of great size. The only advantage I see is that the wind direction is not a factor as in a conventional wind generator. Height and blade diameter is a major factor in utilising the generating capacity of wind.

    • @Nailnuke
      @Nailnuke Рік тому

      @@warrenelliott4555 I agree, also wind at rooftop level is completely unreliable , buildings interfere causing eddies etc which is why wind farms are on top of hills or at sea.

    • @mykota2417
      @mykota2417 Рік тому +2

      Alternatively 100's of those dotted all over my house n garden would produce a lot of battery charging power n not disturb neighbours(they'd just think it's that crazy guy again) ... I'm thinking rainbow colour...

    • @FLodge100
      @FLodge100 Рік тому

      Wrong…. he explains why.

    • @the_original_skytiger
      @the_original_skytiger Рік тому

      @@FLodge100 lol

  • @gigi3242
    @gigi3242 Рік тому

    that would be awesome for apartment dwellers with a balcony; endless applications really. Thank you

  • @mattmiller220
    @mattmiller220 Рік тому

    I love that you work on and share all these wholesome projects. Very productive use of time. 🤗

  • @KevinHoey1
    @KevinHoey1 Рік тому +5

    Nice idea on a moving vehicle as it's generating during any journey regardless if it's windy or not. I wish you would do a return video on the diesel air heater for efficiently scavenging heat from the exhaust.

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +1

      for sure

    • @Simon-dm8zv
      @Simon-dm8zv Рік тому +4

      obviously using it while driving would increase the fuel consumption.

    • @gilray1977
      @gilray1977 Рік тому +1

      You need to study up on the concept of 'perpetual motion'. The energy needed from the vehicle's engine to combat the windage would not be off set by the amount of power produced. Way more efficient to simply have a mechanically spun alternator / generator. Now if you were camping for a few days next to a desert lake or along a sea cliff say... then it would be a nice bit of kit to augment other power production.

    • @MHLivestreams
      @MHLivestreams 5 місяців тому

      @@gilray1977 it would be interesting to see how much a small unit could produce. Even 1 amp would be great if it's spinning 24 hours a day.

  • @rtfazeberdee3519
    @rtfazeberdee3519 Рік тому +8

    What size does it have to be to make it a useful turbine for 500w/1000w? Having a 500w on my roof would cover power needed for things like fridges/freezers. Great stuff keep it going, its really interesting

  • @johan96149
    @johan96149 Рік тому +2

    Great project. Aeromine aerofoils in front of the device can be used to focus and accelerate the wind. The fence at the back will slow down the airflow. This will result in some of the air flowing around the outside. A dorade type shape at the top, can suck air out through the turbine. This can be part of the direction fin. Can this be used to condense moisture from the air also? Ways to make water will be valuable for the boats taking part in the GGR retro yacht race. Cold sea water can be siphoned through a condensation device. Solar cooker can be used for distillation.

  • @evanleebodies
    @evanleebodies Рік тому

    Above all else....that is a work of art, I love the curving lines.

  • @kevinleebailey
    @kevinleebailey Рік тому +3

    This concept of wind capture implemented in to a panel system similar to the wind wall would be amazing. You could build fencing with it and clad whole side's of buildings with it. Just think of the surface area a typical house wall has.

  • @captainoates7236
    @captainoates7236 Рік тому +5

    Robert.
    I love all your designs but I can't seem to decide what is a thechnical revelation or otherwise.
    I would love to see a comparison with power output on all of your devices.
    So maybe compare the wattage given out per windspeed or even power per uk pound (£) spent on the build

  • @lesliejinks2434
    @lesliejinks2434 Рік тому +1

    Try adding a hood/top on it shaped like an overturned v bottom boat without a transom,with a vane on the rear keel. Free to rotate with the wind. Theoretically this should create a low pressure area at the outlet for the turbine. If attached to the shroud as well that would keep the open face to the wind.

  • @NameIsDoc
    @NameIsDoc Рік тому +1

    Another thing you should look at is differential pressure system based wind generation.
    there are a few new wind turbines where instead of using the wind to turn an turbine outright. they instead use hollow wingforms attached to long tubes with holes in the low pressure areas of the wingform. When air is blown over the wing it creates a small vacuum like we use for lift in airplanes. However in this case with the holes in the right place the vacuum sucks the air out of the pipe attached to the wing rather then creating lift. you can then stick a turbine at the end of the pipe to generate power.

  • @dudleysmith5111
    @dudleysmith5111 Рік тому +14

    Other than measuring some voltage outputs, has anyone measured any power outputs with varying loads to determine how the concept actually performs? It’s a great concept and your work is engaging and really informative. Stay curious!

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +3

      volts is no good mate - you need to measure torque on the shaft

    • @35manning
      @35manning Рік тому +12

      I would argue that watt output is a sufficient measurement as at the end of the day, that is all we really care about.
      Having a generator built up, with a couple wires running down to a test bench, you only need to measure the power output of as you apply a progressively larger load and see where the wattage peaks before stalling the turbine.
      A large fan, such as a positive pressure ventilation fan used by fire departments, could be used within an enclosed environment as a static source of wind, a conventional wind turbine tested and your unit tested to compare.
      My long term life goal is to build a self sufficient electrical powered sailboat (with a diesel generator for backup, because I'm not totally crazy, but hope I never need it).
      Wind turbines are commonly under powered, noisy and bulky compared to solar and hydro power generation, especially when looking at a huge power budget of induction stove tops, convection microwave, electric incinerator toilet AND an electric drive motor.
      Not to mention, fridge / freezers, washing machine clothes dryer and electric heating / cooling (reverse cycle marine AC with sea water heat exchanger most likely).
      A couple of these high on the mast may be quite useful, IF the power output is worth the extra weight up the mast.
      Another thing you might consider, is some way to turn it off.
      On a following wind, capturing and converting to electrical power will also produce some mechanical force helping propel the boat, but any wind coming from forward of 90 degrees will also effect a force on the boat, in the wrong direction.
      In most cases, this won't matter that much, but on light winds where you want everything to work for you, anything working against you is bad.
      BTW, hi. Random UA-cam recommendation brought me here.

    • @dudleysmith5111
      @dudleysmith5111 Рік тому +2

      @@ThinkingandTinkering I agree. Torque will be the ultimate measurement.

    • @skunkjobb
      @skunkjobb Рік тому +6

      @@ThinkingandTinkering Volts and amps together would be most interesting and easier to measure than the torque.

    • @gilray1977
      @gilray1977 Рік тому +1

      ​ @Emily35 ~
      "On a following wind, capturing and converting to electrical power will also produce some mechanical force helping propel the boat, "

  • @SimianLive
    @SimianLive Рік тому +4

    would you mind printing the next parts with different colours kinda to match the cad designs so its easier to see what parts are what especally if they have moving and static parts ?,...or a little bit of paint / pen markings just so it has a visual of it spinning on camera 😆 hard to see whats moving and whats static with it all being grey, untill you did the topdown view of the impella but with you adding more and more items to these designs it just helps it stand out.

  • @Behnam_Moghaddam
    @Behnam_Moghaddam Рік тому

    This was pretty much exactly, what i concluded for my use case following this wonderful Channel.
    Thank you very mutch (yet again) for this specific one and for the whole journey up until now!
    And Beyond!☕

  • @traviswansai2784
    @traviswansai2784 Рік тому +1

    i think your wind turbine is a Great idea, and will put it to the test. If you have any print settings you prefer please share them. Otherwise we will post our progress here.
    Printing the cones large end down is just slightly over 7 hours with 80 overhang angle.
    Small end down results hover 11 hours, 80 overhang angle.
    Cura slicer
    Creality 10s Pro
    E-sun PLA + (testing filament) will change to PETG on test completion.

    • @NebulaM57
      @NebulaM57 Рік тому +1

      I too am trying to print this but having issues with the turbine fins. The unit prints fine but the fins are not printing properly. Initial layers don't seem to go all the way across the gap from the hub to the outer ring. Some lay down fine but others only about half way or so. Very frustrating!! haha I'm using Cura also on a Sovol SV01. Overture PLA.. I struggle printing fine details. I'm also trying to print a small King's crown with the little balls on the tips, about 50mm diameter, but they won't attach. The crown prints fine but finishes up with a spiderweb of stringing with little blobs mixed in. Any constructive ideas would be much appreciated. Thank you!

    • @traviswansai2784
      @traviswansai2784 Рік тому

      @@NebulaM57 3D printing can be very frustrating due to all the fine settings that need to be checked. I think You should check different settings using a Benchy.
      A few years ago I eliminated most of my print failures with extruder temperature calibration, and slower print speeds. Print speeds should not change from walls and layers. Every time the print speed changes the nozzle pressure will change requiring the extruder temperature to fluctuate.
      Curing your filament with a food dryer before printing can be a problem solver.
      Hope this helps!

  • @jollygreengiant
    @jollygreengiant Рік тому +14

    I saw a similar looking design for a stacked ion drive the other day, but thrust was impaired as later stages actually restricted the flow from earlier stages. Might this design be improved by increasing the size of the central aperture of each stage as you approach the turbine, encouraging a cylindrical laminar flow?

    • @ferrumignis
      @ferrumignis Рік тому

      I had the exact same thought as I watched this, airflow will progressively increase as you move up the stack. A widening aperture sounds like the logical step, though airflow tends to do unexpected things so would need plenty of testing (ideally simulation to start with).

  • @alexd7466
    @alexd7466 Рік тому +5

    great! Would love to see how efficient this thing is - and how it performs with a somewhat heavy generator (as you probably don't want it to spin too fast ).

  • @richardpeel6056
    @richardpeel6056 Рік тому

    I've just discovered your channel.
    I was discussing solar power on the UK Campsite Forum website today and wrote "If at dawn each day you have less charge left in your battery than the day before you will at some point run out of power. You now have the Apollo 13 problem of saving enough power to get you back to Earth but of being alive when you return." ...... "The alternative to more solar panels is a wind turbine which would provide power during bad weather and at night."
    My jaw dropped open when I saw your turbine as this is something that could bridge the solar panel gap. Every portable wind turbine I've seen before requires an Eiffel Tower to support it and it slices up seagulls and children in operation.
    I want to know more and have clicked on Subscribe and Like.

    • @richardpeel6056
      @richardpeel6056 Рік тому

      I just looked up the RAM Air Turbines fitted to jet airliners for use in emergencies should the power supply fail, these are deploy-able seagull chopper propellers powered by the aircraft's flight through the air. If your wind turbines work they might end up fitted on all jet aircraft, deployment would be on a simple jack in the box spring/dead man switch.

  • @reypolice5231
    @reypolice5231 Рік тому

    Thank you Robert for all the wonderful things you show in your videos.

  • @chriswick6904
    @chriswick6904 Рік тому +6

    Excellent idea.!

  • @alaingrignon
    @alaingrignon Рік тому +9

    @Rob, as a sailor, I love this one. Very interesting indeed. I'd be curious to know how you would calculate the efficiency of that turbine. I know you mentioned the area of the cones would be what you use, but if you could make a video on how you would go about inputting that into Omni Calculator to get a sense of efficiency, would be pretty interesting for anyone looking to expand on this idea and wants to calculate it properly. Just a suggestion mate! Really enjoying the whole wind turbine stuff.

    • @davidanderton2437
      @davidanderton2437 Рік тому

      Turbine efficiency is fairly easy to calculate it's just wind velocity X surface area.

    • @sonic_P
      @sonic_P Рік тому +2

      @@davidanderton2437 What? efficency= wind velocity X surface area? whatever mechanism is in that area? This can not be true - u get it yourslef, right?

    • @davidanderton2437
      @davidanderton2437 Рік тому +1

      @@sonic_P sorry I should be more precise in what I write. You only really need the area and velocity to calculate the available power. It's not as simple as multiplication but not far off. 0.5 X air density X swept area X velocity cubed.

    • @mariosanchez-sj9yv
      @mariosanchez-sj9yv Рік тому

      Make some sails that work as solar panels

  • @SvdSinner
    @SvdSinner Рік тому +1

    This would be a brilliant generator to trickle charge the batteries of vehicles that don't get started often.

  • @rrrusted2883
    @rrrusted2883 Рік тому

    Awesome idea and prototype! Love it!
    Reading through the comments many seem to be hung up on powering up a huge generator and living off grid or just coming up with ways it won't work. This is a prototype. It's the first step of working out an idea!
    Why not start small and maybe focus on charging a cell phone. That would be great for a minor power outage then develop the idea from there.

  • @skampp
    @skampp Рік тому +18

    Hi Robert, this is amazing! I'm wondering if the limiting factor on this isn't the wind input, but the wind exhaust? I love this application! Thank you!

    • @RubenKelevra
      @RubenKelevra Рік тому +1

      The limit is that you compress/speed up the air to move through the smaller area of the turbine. There's quite some loss attached to this. So using a device like this makes only sense if you otherwise cannot achieve such a large area (safely).
      The compression of the wind will increase depending on how much energy you extract - so your electrical load - which would need to be managed to be in an optimal efficiency range for the blade pitch/optimal RPM for the generator.
      If you want to simplify the system electrically, you could use centrifugal force to adjust the blade pitch to keep it in an optimal pitch for the wind pressure (aka wind speed).
      So you get a variable RPM but an optimal pitch to capture the wind with optimal efficiency.
      The variable RPM can then be converted to an optimal RPM of the generator with a CVT - instead of using magnets in the rotor itself (which is a stupid idea to begin with).

  • @thatcheapguy525
    @thatcheapguy525 Рік тому +43

    Robert, the development of this project has really caught my attention. I'm fascinated to see where it concludes. could this be a foundation for a power-system to run your garage from?

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +12

      yes - i think it could mate

    • @thatcheapguy525
      @thatcheapguy525 Рік тому +20

      @@ThinkingandTinkering I currently have a mini solar system running 12v and 5v power supplies in my garage, just enough for simple LED lighting and phone charging. this wind turbine project of yours may well end up as the reason I buy a 3D printer and make some little wind turbines in addition to the solar rig.
      keep up the good work Sir!
      Mike

    • @JesusSaves86AB
      @JesusSaves86AB Рік тому +1

      I'd be happier with just a 12v or even 5v output to match my existing portable solar.

    • @saddamhussainssaddamhussei3613
      @saddamhussainssaddamhussei3613 Рік тому

      Make possible that E V cars to get charged while on drive.
      One side battery discharges power ,on the other side through this wind power generating turbines the battery gets charged.
      So, there is no necessity to plug for a charge . it automatically gets charged through alternator and discharges power for rotary motor.

    • @whiskeyinthejar24
      @whiskeyinthejar24 Рік тому +1

      @@saddamhussainssaddamhussei3613 you will effect the aerodynamics of the vehicle and waste more than you generate.

  • @onnobeckerhof5790
    @onnobeckerhof5790 Рік тому

    It's great to follow and learn. Spinning without friction is first step. Spinning with a load is going to be the next step. Windforce needed to generate a certain amount of energy. Looking forward to that.

  • @roxannerobertson554
    @roxannerobertson554 Рік тому

    Loved it! ☺ Love your enthusiasm and inventive mind! Such a delight to listen to….God bless ya!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻☺

  • @laskartrece
    @laskartrece Рік тому +13

    Also can work for a RV (motorhome). Thank you Sir!!

    • @dannywilson5852
      @dannywilson5852 Рік тому +5

      I was thinking the same, use the wind power while driving to charge the batterys in the camper van as solar is not always great in winter so any extra electricity would help

    • @replikvltyoutube3727
      @replikvltyoutube3727 Рік тому +5

      Other than charging it also can serve as a fan moving air inside. Some RVs have problem with airflow

    • @ThinkingandTinkering
      @ThinkingandTinkering  Рік тому +2

      You bet!

    • @Buzzhumma
      @Buzzhumma Рік тому +2

      @@replikvltyoutube3727 yes they do but unfortunately in tropical areas where that's a huge problem it also coincides with still days . Humidity and still days is the most awful experience especially 4-5 days straight . In this situation you would have to use the energy to spin the motor for airflow

    • @srw_cricket2976
      @srw_cricket2976 Рік тому +2

      @@dannywilson5852 Wouldn’t that cause drag so you’re offsetting fuel for electric?

  • @brettjamesy
    @brettjamesy Рік тому +4

    Free spinning in the breeze is one thing, have you tested the design underload? I'm guessing its good for milliwatts only. Maybe scaled up it may amount to usable energy. Interesting experiment in any case

    • @theodorehyatt1782
      @theodorehyatt1782 Рік тому

      Yeah don't think it would be wise to turn off grid power just yet it more less a potato

  • @lembriggs1075
    @lembriggs1075 Рік тому

    Like the idea a lot! Put this on the roof during a hurricane and might be able to charge a watch battery and then be able to light up an LED or two. Make a full sized model and maybe could operate a small radio.
    Cool Beans!

  • @multiplysixbynine
    @multiplysixbynine Рік тому +1

    This is a cute design but it’s hard to get a sense of the scale of the apparatus that would be required to produce a meaningful amount of power in real world conditions. I imagine you’d need some quite large structures and a gear box to generate a few kilowatts and it would be significantly less efficient than a horizontal axis wind turbine because the air has to change direction as it is funneled through the turbine.

  • @IslandAmazing
    @IslandAmazing Рік тому +5

    So my next question with is, how many can you stack. Do you get better results stacking 6 elements with a single turbine on top, and repeating again with 6 elements and turbine. Or 12 elements and a single turbine in one. which give best performance. at what point is there a diminishing return on the height of a single tower.

    • @petrbrok2468
      @petrbrok2468 Рік тому

      Excellent question, I would like to know answer especially for roof ridge configuration. I think it would depend on wind speed..

    • @neoporcupine
      @neoporcupine Рік тому

      There would be a limit based on the input flow, where if the flow force added by the additional disc air was equal or less than that already rising then no further power is added.

  • @abubakrsubedar
    @abubakrsubedar Рік тому +3

    The roof-based collector idea is something I'm really interested in. I'm trying to see if I can make the hyperbolic cones threaded so one can simply screw into the next (though I'm not sure if that might make them too weak)

  • @TheMaDBaRoNHahA
    @TheMaDBaRoNHahA Рік тому +1

    With the amount charged for a fan to push air into a campervan a passive (quiet) option that used mo power or even makes it would be an interesting development of this :)

  • @MasterMindmars
    @MasterMindmars Рік тому

    The wind generator of the future. Congratulations. You are a genius.

  • @D-B-Cooper
    @D-B-Cooper Рік тому +80

    Killing a seagull is the least of our worries 😂. You need to make a new mike.

  • @34136TS
    @34136TS Рік тому +4

    Guys - is there a forum anywhere that these projects are discussed on further? I understand that Rob is creating these concepts and inspiring us, and hasn't the free time or necessarily the motivation to progress each concept to fruition. This generator is hugely interesting to me as a narrowboat owner, so I'd like to take it further, adapt the shield to support a vane, add a suitable coil and then weatherproof the whole device so it can be trialed in-situ. I don't have the skills or the knowledge to do this, but I'm sure there are other viewers here that do - hence the idea of a forum where build threads can be observed by all and thus refined over a period of time from the feedback. So, where do I start? Cheers, Steve

    • @Throku
      @Throku Рік тому +2

      This. Can this post be pinned?

    • @YoureNowOnTV
      @YoureNowOnTV Рік тому +1

      Back when Rob and Luke streamed on Twitch we suggested a Discord server but I can't remember what happened to the idea. I think it was a case of another thing for Rob to manage and feed so it didn't happen.

    • @34136TS
      @34136TS Рік тому

      @@YoureNowOnTV I assume that maybe Luke or a nominated outsider could admin/look after the forum with Rob popping up now and again to chip in if inspired to do so? I can only see it becoming a hotbed of ideas, and it may alleviate the number of messages that Rob appears to receive. Shamefully I'm too old to understand Discord, can you post images etc like in an "old school" forum?

    • @YoureNowOnTV
      @YoureNowOnTV Рік тому

      @@34136TS You sure can post images also videos and can have voice to voice conversations if you wish. 😀👍

    • @34136TS
      @34136TS Рік тому +1

      @@YoureNowOnTV Blimey, you young 'uns are so sophisticated! 🤣🤣 Thanks 👌

  • @torqwrench5901
    @torqwrench5901 10 місяців тому

    At around 2:00 min sound gets ghastly better ! Thanks! Much easier to understand from that point.

  • @StargateNomad-01
    @StargateNomad-01 Рік тому

    The simplicity is simply amazing!

  • @Si-jk4iy
    @Si-jk4iy Рік тому +5

    Robert, super interesting and with great potential. You talked about capture area versus swept area. Is there also a sweet spot of how many and proximity of stacked cones in terms of power output and or efficiency? I can't help but feel that too many stacks or proximity would lead to air being "slowed" by boundary layer surface effects (think friction)- in essence a fixed "overhead" or "cost" (for want of simplification) for trying to make the system bigger and more powerful. Any thoughts or analysis on this side of an otherwise great concept?

  • @FunkOsax
    @FunkOsax Рік тому +47

    The rather poor sound quality of your videos make it difficult to watch your otherwise very interesting videos.

    • @bugsy742
      @bugsy742 Рік тому +5

      😂 wash yer ears out mate, it’s fine

    • @satan.is.my.copilot
      @satan.is.my.copilot Рік тому +9

      ​@@bugsy742 While he's easily understandable, the sound quality is still pretty bad...

    • @bugsy742
      @bugsy742 Рік тому +3

      @@satan.is.my.copilot I hear you mate BUT “make it difficult to watch” 🤣 some folk just need to man up! My ears are smashed to pieces from a full career in warzones with zero hearing protection and predominantly around .5 machine guns, I can hear it fine, it’s actually not bad in the slightest it’s just not perfect, god knows how some people make it through the day 🙄

    • @flhusa1
      @flhusa1 Рік тому

      Maybe try another microphone. Know anybody who can lend you theirs to see if makes a difference ?

    • @MarkoManiac
      @MarkoManiac Рік тому +3

      He ain't wrong though. I scrolled a bit and gave up. Bad audio = no watch. More than a guy can watch in a lifetime uploaded daily, most don't sound like they used a mic in a porcelain bowl in a tile washroom. Get a $30 lav mic and your views will 10x.

  • @FedericoLucchi
    @FedericoLucchi 4 місяці тому

    Very nice concept, it would indeed make a lot of sense on a sailboat. Now it would be particularly interesting to get an actual "power to size" measurement. I think that even a small 50-100W turbine would be very useful on a sailboat, simply to back up the solar panels and give some charge during the night or cloudy days.

  • @craigglewis
    @craigglewis Рік тому

    Well, it seems you just solved our power issues.
    Roof cap a row of this will power a home.
    Fantastic

  • @patsquach4080
    @patsquach4080 Рік тому +1

    Looking forward to when you get into …. Battery banks …. To see ,just how fast your turbines will charge them up !

  • @Dougohere1
    @Dougohere1 Рік тому

    It's efficient, compact, and could be fitted into multiple areas. It surely must have great commercial potential.

  • @kenjohnson5498
    @kenjohnson5498 Рік тому +2

    I always have a breeze to a moderate wind Something on a larger scale could provide a lot of power if done correctly. Iv'e watched a ton of your videos but this one got me to tickle the subscribe button. I already have so many ideas and have started sourcing parts for the build.

    • @limmoblack
      @limmoblack Рік тому

      Why wouldn't you subscribe even in the middle of 'the ton' of vids you've watched? (just out of interest)

  • @davidshelley6598
    @davidshelley6598 Рік тому

    lovely little gizmo. thanks Robert

  • @kst357
    @kst357 Рік тому +1

    I'd like to see a follow-up piece on how much torque this design puts out in comparison to vertical & horizontal bladed designs.

  • @gacattack1234
    @gacattack1234 Рік тому

    To make it funnel more air and to right it to the wind in a nice package you could put 2 funnel edges added to the sides where the shroud stops wrapping around and a third larger one as a tail in the middle on the back of the shroud.

  • @sascha4324
    @sascha4324 Рік тому

    It's good that this thing is from our manufacturer...

  • @Vopadevas
    @Vopadevas Рік тому

    This could easily be installed on roof lines to power individual homes! Well done, far better idea than windmills.

  • @dazley8021
    @dazley8021 Рік тому

    Love your energy! Keep on doing!

  • @karencurtis6141
    @karencurtis6141 Рік тому

    This looks very exciting 🤗, energy for my caravan 🥰

  • @jakerazmataz852
    @jakerazmataz852 Рік тому

    Nice concept. I'll be back when it generates significant power.

  • @MechThumbs
    @MechThumbs Рік тому

    That is amazing can't wait to start this for my house. The best thing about it is that its actually quite beautiful!!

  • @hendrikjbboss9973
    @hendrikjbboss9973 Рік тому

    Referring back to video's 1869 and 1870, with a little modification of the serpentine coil assembly, by making a larger centre opening, one could turn the coil assembly upside down and fit it to the shield.

  • @philipscott4101
    @philipscott4101 Рік тому

    Brilliant idea. I’ve also just watched a fascinating demonstration of a magnetic gearbox. This could be added to accelerate the speed thus increase power generated. I welcome comments.

  • @averyintrusive7610
    @averyintrusive7610 Рік тому

    That design is well suited to a planetary sun gear configuration based around the spinning exhaust plate. Like an automatic transmission in a car, gear ratios would accommodate variable wind conditions. Except in reverse. The output would spin the generator, naturally. Inspiring idea!

  • @marcfruchtman9473
    @marcfruchtman9473 Рік тому

    Super cool design. This looks very scalable too!

  • @darrenwoodhead7661
    @darrenwoodhead7661 Рік тому

    There is a full size one on Skegness pier - looks awesome and clever engineering

  • @DevineLuLinvega
    @DevineLuLinvega Рік тому

    We'll print one out and try it out aboard our vessel :) thanks for this wonderful series

  • @thompsonyie7506
    @thompsonyie7506 Рік тому +1

    The turbine is still the actual limit as you can get choked flow, hence there is a limit to how much stacks of cones you can effectively stack (beyond which you get diminishing to no returns). Also since the turbine won't be 100% efficient at extracting the energy from the wind the leftover could be the start of the next stack of cones (and presumably you could use less cones before you saturate the following turbine).

  • @LostWaxProcess
    @LostWaxProcess Рік тому

    Damn you. I’ve been resisting the urge to buy a 3D printer for ages. Now I’ve not got an excuse. Wonderful stuff matey.

  • @howardg396
    @howardg396 Рік тому

    This looks like it would be a great design for those places on land that get snow as the generator is on the top. Put some type of a cone on top with an overhang that would keep the snow from mucking things up and it should work quite well I would think. Seeing as our snow has finally gone away I'll have to give it try and see for next fall.

  • @timothyperrigoue3997
    @timothyperrigoue3997 Рік тому

    A year ago I was fooling with the shield idea to help work a vertical rotor ...THIS design is Lightyears ahead ! Plus being omni directional makes it maritime application perfect!

  • @scott41598
    @scott41598 Рік тому

    Awesome job on this!

  • @fifispdc
    @fifispdc Рік тому

    je pense que c'est le meilleur concept pour du transportable de par la taille, et la sécurité, il faut vérifier le rendement. bravo !!

  • @paintedwings74
    @paintedwings74 Рік тому

    Think about what this could do as part of a furnace bellows! In the right arrangement, the heat-driven draft could be set up in a two-part loop; one part as bellows, the other to provide electrical power for some other purpose.

  • @michelharnois1302
    @michelharnois1302 Рік тому

    Great idea Robert, It is always inspiring. I will try to scale it up and show you the result. One of my concern is about snow. I live in Canada, and as you might know we get snow storm sometime. Although, during those events the wind is great and can get up to 12m/s, the snow pushed by that wind can glog any mechanism. The snow can also melt and then freeze again during a 24 hours span. I will have to come with a solution, but the basic design is fantastic.

    • @sindeclerc7506
      @sindeclerc7506 Рік тому

      How about a second cover 😊. Done.

    • @michelharnois1302
      @michelharnois1302 Рік тому

      @@sindeclerc7506 Not really because at that windspeed the snow travels almost horizontally. And the cover would also prevent the wind to exit the turbine. The cover would be usefull though, when the snow falls without any wind. For those situations, there would have to be a space between the turbine and the cover so the wind could exit. I will come up with something

  • @PeaceJourney...
    @PeaceJourney... Рік тому

    Such an elegant and simple design, very effective and attainable. Thank you sir

  • @dinosaur0073
    @dinosaur0073 3 місяці тому

    Thank you, Robert
    Interesting design..!!! 🤔

  • @randyhamilton3395
    @randyhamilton3395 Рік тому

    Excellent! For bet effect for your videos, add a stripe on the rotor to illustrate the speed it is turning!

  • @crossrunnerxx
    @crossrunnerxx Рік тому

    Very good design, as long as it is connected with a generator, it can be widely used.

  • @DeeP_BosE
    @DeeP_BosE Рік тому +1

    V interesting. Maybe the rear curved backing plate cud revolve with the direction of wind.

  • @johnthomas5806
    @johnthomas5806 9 місяців тому

    Thank You Mr. Smith