IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 Battle of Midway, America attack - Part1 [Fights, crashes, fails compilation]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @Nylonical_Nonsense72
    @Nylonical_Nonsense72 3 роки тому +3

    Hey man! I just recently discovered your channel and boutgh IL-2 1946! I saw you're a pretty slamm channel and subscribed, liked, turned on notifications and even desabled my Ad-Block on your channel! I hope you gro and get the level of Rensic for example. Keep up the good work! :)

  • @danbell124
    @danbell124 3 роки тому +1

    Hi good video but to make loss rates believable you can set rate of fire for ships. Anything greater will slow them to a more realistic rate. I recommend 8 for Japanese ships and 6 or 7 for American ships :)

    • @deadlyflights1366
      @deadlyflights1366  3 роки тому +2

      Thanks for your suggestion, i'll keep that in mind, yes i increased it a little bit because i wanted more crashed to record, but i will always try to keep as much realistic as possible

  • @titantanic7255
    @titantanic7255 3 роки тому +1

    Do the duantlesses not have bombs in IL-2?

  • @nikkireborn5923
    @nikkireborn5923 4 роки тому +2

    Maybe I don't see the reason....but why fly directly over a Japanese carriers, and subject yourself to AA for no reason? These WERE fighters. I can understand why you would have SBD fly over a carrier, but F4F???

    • @deadlyflights1366
      @deadlyflights1366  4 роки тому +4

      Hello, planes flying over AA is done on purpose, i want to record crashes and shutdowns, it is not historical simulation of the real battle, attacks and planes can be the same but the battle is not accurate, because i want them to crash and explode ^^ F4F had bombs too to strike the carries but the replay somehow was bugged and bombs disappeared after released, btw F4F could be used for bombing too, so i decided to use them aswell to be not repetitive with only SBD

    • @nikkireborn5923
      @nikkireborn5923 4 роки тому +4

      @@deadlyflights1366 thanks for the reply...in any case keep up the great work!