MJJC Pro Foam Cannon VS MJJC S 3.0 Foam Cannon!! There Is A Difference For Me!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @apexdetail85
    @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому +9

    Do you use a foam cannon? Which is your favorite?

    • @Carlos.Rivera
      @Carlos.Rivera 10 місяців тому +2

      Griots Brilliant foam cannon. It come 1.1 orifice installed and works well with cheap electric pressure washers. Big mouth so less mess adding chemicals and stainless steel ball in the straw.

    • @richardseem7948
      @richardseem7948 10 місяців тому

      Tri nova and pro..

    • @dtna
      @dtna 10 місяців тому

      I don't know why they went with the narrow base. I don't like the idea of the bottle being less stable.

    • @240sxdriver
      @240sxdriver 10 місяців тому

      MJJC 3.0 blows away my old MTM foam cannon. Also easier on the ears compared to some cheap foam cannons with their higher pitched induction noises.
      The aeration is a noticeable difference like you've experienced in the video so I can turn down the mixture knob a bit up top.
      Please try out the original orifice as well!

    • @Andresthebigkat
      @Andresthebigkat 10 місяців тому

      @@Carlos.Riverasame liked it better than mjjc and mtm it’s stout

  • @archiepezek
    @archiepezek 10 місяців тому +4

    Thanks for the comparison Brian. I have the MJJC V2.0 and I love it. I, like you, want my foam to move down the panel and take the dirt with it. Also, the older version has a wider base which I prefer.

  • @gnawty4662
    @gnawty4662 9 місяців тому +1

    The shop is looking BEAUTIFUL! What a turn around 👏

  • @bryanjohnson665
    @bryanjohnson665 10 місяців тому +3

    My guess is if both were brand new, they'd be nealry identical. The older model likely has some clogging or deposits on the screen and filter based on the amount of usage. I'd say you can't go wrong with either. Got my pro a few years ago for $55.

  • @swoldierjan5332
    @swoldierjan5332 6 місяців тому +3

    The filter is just newer on the S line that’s why it’s producing a thicker foam. If both were new, they’d produce the same quality foam.

  • @wescat2
    @wescat2 10 місяців тому +3

    You could definitely tell a difference. I too like the runnier foam. That is the perfect consistency for an alkaline pre-wash.

  • @bhcamaro2002
    @bhcamaro2002 10 місяців тому +1

    Ive had the 2.0 for 2 years it still works great!

  • @DetailsNMe
    @DetailsNMe 10 місяців тому +1

    I use the MJJC Pro 2 with my active 2.0 and together they feel like Gods gift 🎁….I have yet to try the version 3; but until my Pro 2 falls part…I’m completely satisfied with the level of foam I obtain with my unit 😊 great video!! And gorgeous vehicles!!!

  • @steveclark2426
    @steveclark2426 10 місяців тому

    I just got the MJJC 3 and I have vey hard water. I find I have to use slot of soap. So far armour detail has given me the best results with less foam. I appreciate the solid build and clear bottle of the 3.

  • @Jayb21724
    @Jayb21724 10 місяців тому +1

    Appreciate the time for another great video! Keep those comparisons going!

  • @limoman4125
    @limoman4125 10 місяців тому

    My cannon is cheap one!! I said i will up grade when it starts failing. So far so good. And it's always a pleasure spending time with u also!!

  • @coreymerritt7742
    @coreymerritt7742 10 місяців тому +2

    I have the version 2 pro been working great love the foam thanks Brian

  • @micd9256
    @micd9256 10 місяців тому

    I use the MJJC pro regularly. Had to replace the metal screens and foam piece after about 2 years and it’s back to new. Planning to try the 3.

  • @SaddyTaz
    @SaddyTaz 10 місяців тому

    Thanks Brian for another great video. I got mine a month ago but due to the cold weather here in New York, I haven't got a chance to foam my car with it yet. Can't wait any longer!

  • @dougmasters3875
    @dougmasters3875 10 місяців тому

    I have the S 3.0 purely because it was a little cheaper than the Pro. I've been super happy with it compared to the el cheapo Amazon lances. I learned two things in this video: a) I needed to change the jet, b) the marks on laundry detergent cups are ounces.

  • @icurt06
    @icurt06 10 місяців тому

    I use an Armour All foam cannon. I had to put thread tape on the cup to stop it from falling apart when using it. Not much foam more of a runny soap that runs down the vehicle. The MJJJC would be a nice upgrade! Thanks for the video

  • @paulreichelt1259
    @paulreichelt1259 10 місяців тому +1

    Check out that gorgeous Poison Ivy HSV Commodore in the background.

  • @tracyenglish9998
    @tracyenglish9998 10 місяців тому +3

    The new foam cannon has a newer screen in it, that may be why it's a little thicker foam

  • @johngriffiths3394
    @johngriffiths3394 10 місяців тому

    I use the MJJC Pro 2 on an Ava Smart pressure washer P60 for home use- no complaints. Bilt Hamber Touch-less snow foam, just the best on earth for dirt removal. (Your Lambo is gorgeous.)

  • @ShineYourLightDetailing
    @ShineYourLightDetailing 10 місяців тому +1

    Excellent comparison Brian, I have the PRO V2 and love it. 👍🏼👍🏼

  • @Rob12345
    @Rob12345 5 місяців тому

    I just bought the MJJC pro and I love it !

  • @elithegreat6463
    @elithegreat6463 10 місяців тому +1

    The Shop Manager made a surprise inspection , you're lucky it came out well. 😋

  • @dthomson409
    @dthomson409 10 місяців тому +2

    Oh my god a Holden wagon!

  • @JeepJL
    @JeepJL 10 місяців тому +2

    I’d be willing to bet if you put new metal and fiber filters into the Pro V2 the performance between the two would have been identical. Conversely, after using the S V3.0 for some time, I bet you’d get the exact same results as your current Pro V2.

  • @nyernga
    @nyernga 10 місяців тому +1

    Do both cannons have the same size orifice?

  • @kennythomsonjr5553
    @kennythomsonjr5553 10 місяців тому

    They both look great. Can't go wrong with either

  • @davidboyce6427
    @davidboyce6427 10 місяців тому +3

    👀What. You got an Aussie car! So cool Holden a GM collaboration right? So cool.

    • @paulreichelt1259
      @paulreichelt1259 10 місяців тому +1

      If you zoom in it still looks right hand drive?..

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому +1

      This is a right hand drive imported from Aus.

  • @middlegaautomotivedetailin1350
    @middlegaautomotivedetailin1350 10 місяців тому

    I love the V3. I use it about 10 times a week!

  • @Enthusiast_detailing
    @Enthusiast_detailing 10 місяців тому

    I’ve been eying those Mjjc they seem like some of the best foam cannons

  • @millerdetailing4176
    @millerdetailing4176 10 місяців тому

    Great video review and comparison Brian, thank you.

  • @dvlop0018
    @dvlop0018 10 місяців тому

    I still have a soft heart for that Lamborghini. Foam canon, original seems to spread nicer.
    That glossy paint is just awesome.

  • @60trickpa
    @60trickpa 10 місяців тому

    I like the old MJJC Pro foam gun with the runnier foam it is what I use. The attachment on the 3. is nice idea

  • @carlosorengo1809
    @carlosorengo1809 10 місяців тому

    Awsome video, I will use, for the first foaming the PRO with the runny foam first to have the dirt run down first and then when I am ready for the contact wash I will use the new version because you will have more time before the foam dissipate.

  • @bigd9848
    @bigd9848 10 місяців тому

    Good comparison Brian 👊🏼You can get a water filter system for the shop they run about $350 if you have water that is not too good. I have one it is very good to have.Thanks again for the video 👊🏼💎

  • @Carlos.Rivera
    @Carlos.Rivera 10 місяців тому +2

    Shop looks promising 👌

  • @wademiyataki9221
    @wademiyataki9221 10 місяців тому +1

    Looks like the Shop Manager is ready to go home.😁

  • @kidservant
    @kidservant 10 місяців тому

    Question - I enjoy detailing my black, GMC Yukon every 1.5 - 2 weeks. I really liked Turtle wax, "Max Wax" followed with "Flex Wax". Beautiful depth and gloss. I recently found out about the dangers of graphene oxide in the body, its really bad, and I will no longer be using or purchasing graphene products. Im pretty focused on Ceramic products now. Because I detail so often, I dont need a super long lasting product, but I do want depth, shine, protection and ease of use. Do you have some suggestions to replace Max Wax & Flex Wax that doesnt have graphene? Thank for your input!

  • @ddautodetailing
    @ddautodetailing 10 місяців тому

    I have both foam cannons, and each are great. I do need to get a new filter for one of them!

  • @unacarafea567
    @unacarafea567 7 місяців тому +1

    Great..... A new foam cannon works better than an old one with corroding parts. I think I guessed that before the start of the video LOL.....

  • @KotakaSRT
    @KotakaSRT 8 місяців тому

    which one do you preffer?

  • @jarmago7750
    @jarmago7750 3 місяці тому

    If I have the money, I'll pick the version 2 because that thing is indestructible! It's built like a tank. lol

  • @motiOn732
    @motiOn732 10 місяців тому +4

    Orifice size is based on flow, not pressure

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому +1

      Does it not take pressure to get the water to flow through the orifice?:)

    • @motiOn732
      @motiOn732 10 місяців тому +1

      @@apexdetail85 I'm not an expert in this but from what I understand, if you have a high flow machine (which it sounds like you do) with a small orifice, you're going to be pushing more water through a smaller hole which will strain the pump.

  • @Chris-wb7ni
    @Chris-wb7ni 10 місяців тому

    I use an MTM. Which do you prefer Brian

  • @chriskiefer5132
    @chriskiefer5132 10 місяців тому

    Love these informative videos. Ty.

  • @richardseem7948
    @richardseem7948 10 місяців тому

    Awesome video and product review and comparison good friend

  • @tylerfj24
    @tylerfj24 7 місяців тому +1

    ill bet you had extremely old filters in the PRO vs the brand New S model..

  • @c.javier1203
    @c.javier1203 8 місяців тому

    Nice! Just ordered my 3.0 … don’t have a Lambo, but looking forward to using it on my G80 M3. Also, what wheels are those?

  • @markbenno
    @markbenno 10 місяців тому

    Been considering these lances for some time but how do you recommend cleaning them out? Also what methods do you use on the fabric roof too maintain?

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому +1

      Descale them regularly with CLR. I use Angelwax Excelsior for soft tops.

    • @markbenno
      @markbenno 10 місяців тому

      @@apexdetail85 right ok and do you seal them with anything like fabsil?

  • @AntEloftheHouseofEl
    @AntEloftheHouseofEl 10 місяців тому

    Another good video Brian.
    What I'm seeing appears to be aeration.
    The S appears to be lighter and more airy than the Pro.
    When was the last time you descaled or changed the gauze filter?
    I have water harder than Rocky Balboa and I notice a HUGE difference when I descale my cannon.
    Like night and day difference.

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому

      It is truly way overdue.

    • @AntEloftheHouseofEl
      @AntEloftheHouseofEl 10 місяців тому

      @@apexdetail85 guess that's it then!
      Do wish they'd redesign so you don't need to do a total strip down to get to the gauze.
      Thats the one major flaw I've found with every cannon I've seen.

  • @daveparker8019
    @daveparker8019 5 місяців тому

    At the end of the day, which is your go to

  • @Kiki099
    @Kiki099 10 місяців тому

    I own both I use the 3.0 more the only thing I didn't like about the 3.0 is that it leaks if it's on it's side or upside down.

  • @johnp6987
    @johnp6987 10 місяців тому

    The S line is more foamy. I wonder if you would need to work out a new PIR with a cannon upgrade and I have the Pro one but only use it around once a month so it will last for ages even with hard water😄

  • @MNpicker
    @MNpicker 10 місяців тому

    I see foam... thats the objective 😎👌

  • @kimnewling5728
    @kimnewling5728 10 місяців тому +1

    I have an MTM PF22 cannon. Thick foam looks cool, but I like mine with foam of a lower viscosity. I've seen videos with these 2 cannons before, but your video is more fun.
    When you say cannon clugs up, what actually clogs up? Is it fixable? Thanks, Brian.

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому +1

      I need to descale it...change screens.

  • @weSteh
    @weSteh 10 місяців тому

    Is the Holden owner an Aussie Brian?

    • @apexdetail85
      @apexdetail85  10 місяців тому +1

      Not that I know of....bought it from one however.

  • @kennythomsonjr5553
    @kennythomsonjr5553 10 місяців тому

    The new one seems to make much thicker, better quality foam

  • @jimflanagan6029
    @jimflanagan6029 10 місяців тому

    Nice Lamborghini Brian 👍 NJ fan.

  • @richardseem7948
    @richardseem7948 10 місяців тому

    Imo the pro works better.like you stated pro is runny and thats my perferd method

  • @norcalspitshine6406
    @norcalspitshine6406 10 місяців тому

    Nice

  • @KevinCohn-e5w
    @KevinCohn-e5w 3 місяці тому

    Janiya Lock

  • @SignaSoon-t6v
    @SignaSoon-t6v 3 місяці тому

    Gonzalez Linda Wilson Kimberly Jackson Ronald

  • @JosephAllen-u2e
    @JosephAllen-u2e 4 місяці тому

    Thompson Betty Lewis Kimberly Miller Robert

  • @1stfrompuertorico568
    @1stfrompuertorico568 10 місяців тому +1

    First!!!!

  • @nypigskin
    @nypigskin 10 місяців тому

    So, this was a waste of time. You compared an old clogged up cannon to a new one. The water to soap ratio is not calibrated with the knob on top of the guns. These are pretty much the same guns with different bottles.