If you are interested in Bulgarian History I highly recomend you to check the Channel Bulgarian Empire Mapping : ua-cam.com/video/4A4PpTjn7tQ/v-deo.html
Badly done. There was no "Serbia" in the 12th century, only before that. After 12th century the name of the country you are referring to here is "Rascia". Only after Dushan the Strong is it renamed into Serbian Empire. Duklja is referred to as Serbia as often as Rascia is. Also, the Vlastimirovic Serbia extended it's rule over Zachumlia and Pagania, Travunia and Docleia, which you didn't show. Bulgaria was done pretty well tho.
@Mattias Alterschild Untill 1900 never did balkans hate eachother. Never did croats been in war with serbs or bosnians. Bosnia and Serb people did war but some people bc of land and only bc of that. Mostly they were working together or just alon fighting big powers. They started fighting vs eachother after they kicked otomans... And tho ye serbia did fight Bulgarians back in 10 century but those Bulgarians were ruled by Mongolic tribe who idk if even exist today. Today Bulgarian people have same bloodline as every slavic nation in Balkan.
@@Warsawke yes transylvania is not very known though bro. Still a good video. Also I believe just because the Terter dynasty was of partly Cuman origin Bulgaria shouldn't have disappeared on the map
@@KayraAtakanQX yes I know, but they had a Bulgarian identity and were Bulgarian from their maternal side . Also well done on the magyar raids in the 10th century, many people fail to mention them
Tsar Dushan gained his influence/power because he was half Bulgarian on his Mothers side from Royalty, and he was married to a Bulgarian princess... The first Serbian Backstab starts with Dushan, and again in 1885
You are both a fantastic example of how stupid and toxic Serbian and Bulgarian nationalism can be. First Dushan had a Serbian identity and that is what matters . All monarchs of medieval Europe were of mixed ethnic backgrounds due to the often practice of diplomatic marriages. Secondly calling the Bulgarians mongol is absolutely brainless. All anthropological analysis on the escavations of the supposedly "Turkic" nobility of the first Bulgarian empire clearly show that these people had an absolutely european phenotype with a small and insignificant Asian admixture. Also the slavs with whom the Bulgars mingled had nothing to do with the Serbs. Especially when you consider that the border of the Serbian principality (tribal Union) was almost 200 kilometers westwards from the region inhabited by the seven slavic tribes.
As a Greek, I have to admit, it was the first time to wait for the Ottomans to appear like a hope just to stop all this dazzling dance between Serbia and Bulgaria coming south to Greece one after the other....i got dizzy
@@IvanSam1 Yes! The slavic migration and later occupation of traditional Byzantine territories by the new slavic countries that tried to be established or replace the Byzantine rule is the theme of those early medieval centuries in the Balkans
Few errors are in beginning Dutchy of Croatia was formed in 626. And Kingdom of Croatian in 925. And In the end you used old etchic map form 1991, if not even older beacise there isn't much Italians in istria too Croats make over 90% of Croatia's population today
Wasn't the first bulgarian empire more Turkic rather than Slavic? I mean the leaders controlling the entity were more turkic and later in second bulgarian empire were more slavic?
The greatest obstacle to the empire's revival was the presence to the south ofthe Danube of the Bulgar khaganate with its capital at Pliska and a southern frontier in the Hebros/Maritza valley only three days march from Constantinople. In 780 the Bulgar state had survived in close proximity to Byzantium for almost a century, taking advantage of the empire's internal problems and wars against the Arabs, and this survival had hardened it into an extremely tough political entity. Its Turkic ruling elite combined the military ferocity of the steppe people they had been with the agricultural resource base of the Slav peasantry they dominated and with the skills of civilization acquired from Greek traders, captives, and defectors. Mango, Cyril A. 2002. The Oxford history of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.172
The Pliska temple may have been in fact a monument erected to commemorate Krum, as the surviving elements of the building are strikingly similar to a number of similar monuments erected for the Turkic qagans in present-day Mongolia. Four other similar structures have been found in Pliska, Madara, and Preslav, all of rectangular or square shape with a north-south or east-west orientation. For the architecture of the “pagan temples” of Bulgaria, see S. Curta, F. (2006). The rise of new powers (800-900). In Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250 (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, pp. 111-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Further evidence linking the Balkan Bulgar state to Turkic cultural traditions was the nature of the Bulgars' primary settlement at Pliska, with its resemblance to a steppe encampment, and a Bulgar tradition of stone relief carvings and inscriptions found scattered throughout the eastern Danubian Plain. P. Hupchick, D., 2017. The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Bulgaria at this time had acquired some traits typical of a barbarian state, because the bellicose tribe of the Bulgars had imported the Turkic traditions of the great steppe into the Balkans. The Old Testament in Byzantium Edited by Paul Magdalino Robert S. Nelson Washington, D.C. :Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection : Distributed by Harvard University Press, c2010. pp. 255
@Brotha Box this place populated much very years ago when slavs come here called Dardania and is part of illyria and about that they are Albanians only the religion change and they wanted Albania
@@tonit4233 Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
@Marinko you are wrong, boy. There are 53% Muslims only 31% orthodoxs and 15% catholics. And the population of Orthodox is declinant at the difference of bosniaks that growing every year. It's not good to lie, boy !
The true Slavic people in this region-Slovenes, received newcomers on their territory in 7th century and lost most of their territory due to so called brotherhood. Ancient and modern Slovenes, Jurij Venelin, Moscau 1830.
Like in the Turkey video, you can see maybe some patches of minorities of South Slavs because as a Bosniak myself living in Germany I know that the countries there are facing decline due to many moving to Germany to seek for a better life. It's sadly the truth that ethnic divisions and corruption are still relevant and nobody cares about it.
bu mappinglerde renksiz olan ama isimleri yazan ülkeler neyi temsil ediyor tam olarak, mesela 1:10 da Hırvatistan ,Sırbistan vs mevcut ancak renkli neden değiller
Önemsiz küçük veya Hakkin da hicbir bilgi olmayan (yönetici bayrak vb) demek ama duruma göre farkli anlama da gelebilir kökeni mesela tartışmalı devletler yada kocaman imparatorluklar yanında herseyi belli olmasına rağmen yöneticilerini göstermeye gerek olmacak kadar gereksiz devletler için yada kültürler için de kullanılabilir . Henüz devletesmemis boylar için de kullanılabilir. genelde seyirci anlıyor onu . Duruma gore değişiyor anlayacağın
En 2020 85,5% bulgares en Bulgarie 83,3% serbes en Serbie 83,1% slovènes en Slovénie 69,8% croates en Croatie 64,2% macédoniens en Macédoine 50,1% bosniaques en Bosnie 45,0% monténégrins au Monténégro In 2020 85,5% bulgarian in Bulgaria 83,3% serbian in Serbia 83,1% slovene in Slovenia 69,8% croatian in Croatia 64,2% macedonian in Macedonia 50,1% bosniak in Bosnia 45,0% montenegrin in Montenegro
Well a lot of info that is gathered is not that exact. For example number of Turks and gypsies in Bularia is higher. In Serbia there is about 300,000 people who did not make a general statement when asked who are they. Slovenia will not recognize minorities so we can only guess. A lot of Croatians left Croatia the second they joined EU. In Bosnia they have calculated even those bosniaks that live outside of Bosnia,and that was a huge issue. And for Montenegro,people say that there are around 40 percent of those who say that they are Montenegrin but around 45 percent say that they speak Serbian.
@@temistogen Slovenia would not recognised minorities? That's bullshit, is more the other way around (looking at Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia). Italian and Hungarian minority + Roma people (Gypsies) have special (political) rights because they are autochthonous. They have much more rights than Slovene minority in their national countries. Serbs, Bosniaks and Croatians are not autochthonous in Slovenia, but they are included in statistics.
@@valentintapata2268 no,slovenia does not recognize any of the former yugoslav republic ethnicities as minorities.We don't have our schools,our rights and we are nor recognized.In serbia slovenians have dedicated schools,and much more rights than vice versa.
Macarların kurucu unsuru olan on kabileden yedisi fin-ugor, üçü türk-ogur kökenli. Hristiyanlık resmi din olduktan sonra yerel slav, cermen ve rumen unsurlarıyla karışım olmuş. Moğol istilası ve osmanlı fetihleri yüzünden nüfusları inanılmaz derecede düştüğü için genetik payları Volga çevresinden biraz uzak. Ama Sekellerde belirgin
din değiştirmekle alakası yok Gagavuzlar Altaylar Yakutlar Çuvaşlar Tuvalılar Hakaslar müslüman değil ama Türk sayılıyorlar çünkü konuştukları dil Türkçe gelenek ve görenekleri Türk ayriyetten Türk olduklarını kabul ediyorlar Ama Bulgarlar ise Türk olduklarını kabul etmiyorlar biz slavız diyorlar hatta Türklerden nefret ediyorlar ayriyetten konuştukları dil Türkçe değil Slavca ve gelenek görenek leri Zaman içinde Slavlaşmış bu yüzden Bulgarlar Türk kabul edilmiyor farklı bir dine mensup olmalarıyla alakalı değil yani😉
Hayır knk Slav türk olan Bulgar kabilesi ile Slav olan Bulgarlar farklı mesela türk kazaklar ile Slav kazakların farklı olması gibi (Türkçe konuşabilirsin bura türk kanalı)
kardeşim biliyorsun bunları benimde aşırı merakım var ama argumanlara nereden ulaşacağımı bilmediğim için bilgi edinmede eksikler yaşıyorum eğer yorumumu okuyorsan tavsiye verebilirmisin rica etsem ?
Povijest i Geografija TV the other information thats wrong is that its showing ethnic macedonians in greece when there isn’t me myself im not greek, macedonia had serbians, bulgarians, and not alot of greeks.
Why did you miss Terter dynasty in Bulgaria? Dynasty had Turk origin but are you sured that there was Turk culture and Terters weren't slavicisated? And you didn't miss period 865-991 when Bulgaria was ruled by Krum's dynasty which had Turk origin as Terter dynasty. And Tsardom of Bulgaria was ruled by German dynasty.
It isnt same . German Dynasty just ruled country but turkic-nomadic countries is different others . Dynasty for state in Europa but state for Dynasty in nomadic countries . The kut faithy is base of nomadic empires. we using when searching central asian nomad history . Kut faithy id confusing topic you can research . But i can say terter Dynasty impressed bulgaria . It is symbol of cuman dominance on balkans. It is important for turkic history and not bulgarian state .
@@KayraAtakanQX I mean that Lower Pannonia existed in 846-875 and had such territory en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Lower_Pannonia#/media/File:Count_Kocel's_territories.PNG And Duchy of Pannonian Croatia existed in 790-900. You subscribed Pannonian Croatia as Lower Pannonia but it is other state. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Pannonian_Croatia
@@KayraAtakanQX Carantanian Slavs formed a majority in Carantania, Lower Panonia and Carniola (another principality, which you didn't show). They soon came under rule of Bavarians and Franks, some of them were part of Nitra and Great Moravia. Their descendants are Slovenes, Kajkavian Croats and minorities (+assimilated people) in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia. Slovenian language is a mix between West Slavic and South Slavic, South Slavic component being stronger.
Bulgaria is earliest than all slav countries official is same place and name from 681 but actually is earlier around 560 got some elder scrolls which got info about that .... and they aren't the elder scrolls of skyrim:D
Yes theys are different so didnt show in this video . Bosnians and goranis lived together in southern kosovo . And if you see i showed a white piece in southern kosovo . Theys are goranis .d es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goranis#/media/Archivo%3AKrahina_e_Gor%C3%ABs_(Gora_region).png
@@papazataklaattiranimam and no they didn't destroyed byzantine empire the did take a lot of terratory from it but never destroyed it like Byzantium did
Nope, DAI incorrectly coorelates the ruler's ethnicity with the erhnicity of the people living in those states. Out of those 4 states : Pagania - integrated into Croatia Zachlumia - was once a vassal of both Croatia and Serbia and the country was divided in Croatian and Serbian spheres of influence Travunia - integrated into Serbia Dioclea - integrated into Serbia, but would form it@s own kingdom under Bodin and become the basis for the country of Montenegro.
South slavs fighting all day with austrians, hungarians, wallachians, ottomans, venecians, latins, italians, albanians, greeks, themselves, the USA and germany. This is what is happening in the entire video.
marinko čavara isnt and never was the president of Bosnia, curently the president of presidency is Šefik Džaferović, before him it was Željko Komšić, and before him Milorad Dodik, otherwise great video
The start of Bulgaria should be at 681, even then when Bulgars created the country, the main population were indeed slavs. 855 is when the cyrillic alphabet was created in the First Bulgarian Empire not when Bulgaria was established.
Not only that but the slavs did partially participate in the governing of the country as tribal chieftains largely kept their authority after the arrival of the Bulgars. Slavs also made up the majority of the infantry of the Bulgarian military. The correct way of viewing the early First Bulgarian Empire is as a Union between the local slavs and the Bulgars.
@Öksökö danuban bulgars didn't came from Volga bulgaria both of them are successor states of old great Bulgaria and yes we know the bulgars were not Slavic even tho they mostly got assimilated into Slavic culture after accepting Christianity and created a Slavic alphabet
@Çağdaş Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
@Lethean Turks as an ethnic group don't exist anymore. Kazakhs are the cleanest of them Turks were always Mongols until the Greeks mainly made them Europeans, Slavs and Persians did the same. Turkic never existed you were pure Mongols You can't explain these much similarities and commons, except if you admit Turkic peoples don't even exist Turks from Turkey don't exist too, Turks aren't Asian looking by any mean
Draguvites su staro pleme Dragovici, samo grci nemaju glasove da to tako i napisu.. Otvori malo knjigu Srpske povelje Grckih vladara, uporedi kako su upisivali nase toponime
Carantania (Part of Slavic Samo's Empire), Independent Carantania, Carantania a Bavarian vassal, Carantania a Frankish vassal, Frankish provinces,... + (Caranatanian) Slavic principalities of Carniola and Lower Panonia + some Carantanian Slavs were part of Nitra, Great Moravia and later Kingdom of Croatia,... Descendants are Slovenes, Kajkavian Croats, Slovene minorities (+ assimilated people) in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia.
@@mrhippo6040 There were three Principalities of Carantanian Slovenes: Karantanija, Karniola and Lower Pannonia (ruled by a Moravian Prince). Kajkavian Croats speak Kajkavian which is a Slovenian dialectic group, they were assimilated by Croatians. I was speaking about Alpine Slavs/Carantanian Slavs and not other groups. Edit: Minorities that I mentioned are Slovenes living outside of Slovenia, but they are not emigrants. A lot of Austrians, Italians, Croatians and Hungarians are descendants of assimilated (Carantanian) Slovenes.
If you are interested in Bulgarian History I highly recomend you to check the Channel Bulgarian Empire Mapping :
ua-cam.com/video/4A4PpTjn7tQ/v-deo.html
I'm curious about Bulgarian empire but the rulers is between if they did rule or not
Badly done. There was no "Serbia" in the 12th century, only before that. After 12th century the name of the country you are referring to here is "Rascia". Only after Dushan the Strong is it renamed into Serbian Empire. Duklja is referred to as Serbia as often as Rascia is. Also, the Vlastimirovic Serbia extended it's rule over Zachumlia and Pagania, Travunia and Docleia, which you didn't show.
Bulgaria was done pretty well tho.
We are interestig of history of Albania, can yo do something about that?
@@gilbertkasnija7085 i did it
@@KayraAtakanQX ok thank you,, can you give me a link, please?
South Slavs: *exists*
Peace between them: *Am I joke to you?*
@Mattias Alterschild Untill 1900 never did balkans hate eachother. Never did croats been in war with serbs or bosnians. Bosnia and Serb people did war but some people bc of land and only bc of that. Mostly they were working together or just alon fighting big powers. They started fighting vs eachother after they kicked otomans... And tho ye serbia did fight Bulgarians back in 10 century but those Bulgarians were ruled by Mongolic tribe who idk if even exist today. Today Bulgarian people have same bloodline as every slavic nation in Balkan.
Ban is that something to be proud?
Play at 144p for full South Slavic experience
You Did it! Amazing work!
He has mistakes for example the Transylvania :/
Ok
@@Warsawke yes transylvania is not very known though bro. Still a good video. Also I believe just because the Terter dynasty was of partly Cuman origin Bulgaria shouldn't have disappeared on the map
@@historyrhymes1701 thanks brother !
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terter_dynasty
@@KayraAtakanQX yes I know, but they had a Bulgarian identity and were Bulgarian from their maternal side . Also well done on the magyar raids in the 10th century, many people fail to mention them
5:32 top ten anime deaths
Her ayrı medeniyet için ayrı ayrı müzik koyup bu videoyu yaptığın çok teşekkür ederim
OK SUBSCRIBE
@@KrasnodarMappingUmbreon251 Yes
@@kafkasedits09 waow
@@thehollandian ne oldu reis
EfeliBall görünce şaşırdım jsjsjs
South Slavs: Peace was never an option
3:34 That's hot
1:42 ah that is hot aswell
2:21 dmitar zvonimir's kinda hot doe
Tsar Dushan gained his influence/power because he was half Bulgarian on his Mothers side from Royalty, and he was married to a Bulgarian princess...
The first Serbian Backstab starts with Dushan, and again in 1885
You are both a fantastic example of how stupid and toxic Serbian and Bulgarian nationalism can be.
First Dushan had a Serbian identity and that is what matters . All monarchs of medieval Europe were of mixed ethnic backgrounds due to the often practice of diplomatic marriages.
Secondly calling the Bulgarians mongol is absolutely brainless. All anthropological analysis on the escavations of the supposedly "Turkic" nobility of the first Bulgarian empire clearly show that these people had an absolutely european phenotype with a small and insignificant Asian admixture. Also the slavs with whom the Bulgars mingled had nothing to do with the Serbs. Especially when you consider that the border of the Serbian principality (tribal Union) was almost 200 kilometers westwards from the region inhabited by the seven slavic tribes.
ahahhahahahah nisam jedini iz Juge koji gleda ovog Turcina
How do you make these videos so fast?
....
Wait... Do you have some mapper supernatural super powers? 🤔
I working very hard
He is a super hero
As a Greek, I have to admit, it was the first time to wait for the Ottomans to appear like a hope just to stop all this dazzling dance between Serbia and Bulgaria coming south to Greece one after the other....i got dizzy
Haha that’s funny from a serb/croat/bulgar. Love 🇬🇷
@@sonnycirkovic9087 haha but is true. Serbia and Bulgaria were ultra energetic during the medieval times.
Love them all 🇭🇷 🇧🇬 🇷🇸
I understand but during the middle ages north and central parts of Greece were inhabited by significant Slavic population.
@@IvanSam1 Yes! The slavic migration and later occupation of traditional Byzantine territories by the new slavic countries that tried to be established or replace the Byzantine rule is the theme of those early medieval centuries in the Balkans
As a Macedonian I have to admit, that you should go back to Pelopones and the Islands. United Macedonia 🇲🇰
Nobody:
Bulgaria: *I like holes in my country* 5:57
Macedonia too
@@amko123 ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΊΑ IS GREEK NAME. 2500 YEARS. YOU ARE SLAVES. VARDARSCA IT'S YOUR NAME. OK?
@@s.g.w.agrinio6538 dude chill wtf
Yeah,those holes are the leftovers of Ottomans
turks living in this holes mostly
Her zamanki gibi ellerine sağlık!
Han " Kayra Atakan"
HEDEF:TÜM DÜNYA HALKLARININ TARİHİ
Which Language Is This
izlemedim ama yine çok güzeldir hitit tarihinide yaparmısın
Hitit tarihi ne oglum akfksjf
@@user-op8gi2rp6u araştırda gel
@@gokturkmapperbmo5800 Hititlerin map videosu yapilacak düzeyde bir tarihi olmadığını bilmiyormusun? O zaman ARAŞTIRDA GEL
@@user-op8gi2rp6u ben şunu söyledim hititler anadoluda kurulmuş bir uygarlık sen mapper üzerinden yapılamaz diyorsun onu biliyoruz
@@gokturkmapperbmo5800 Ben hitit uygarliği yok demedim, hititlerin ele alınacak bir tarihi yok dedim. Ama sen Ota boka atlarsan böyle olur.
This is actually very well made! Thanks!
Emegine saglik
Azerbaycandan hepinixe selam 🇦🇿🇹🇷
salam qardaş
İzlemeden like attım Kayra bey kesinlikle güzel bir videoyonuz dur eminim :)
Sonuna kadar bekle emeginin karsiligini alacagina inaniyorum
Proud to be South Slav and Serb!
Greetings to all friendly people. :))
Proud to be.. wait im not Slav lol
Greetings :)
Few errors are in beginning
Dutchy of Croatia was formed in 626. And Kingdom of Croatian in 925.
And In the end you used old etchic map form 1991, if not even older beacise there isn't much Italians in istria too
Croats make over 90% of Croatia's population today
i doubt that he will see this
Great job but Transylvania was taken in 960-970s
Is not
@@KrasnodarMappingUmbreon251 It is. 900 Is to early.
Every mapper does the same mistake :/
I LIKE CONTENT OF EEVEE
ı saw your comment before ı make this video about this but it is like that according to my sources (centennia historical atlas & Wikipedia)
Slava! from Poland ! great video
4:30 beautiful song
Wasn't the first bulgarian empire more Turkic rather than Slavic? I mean the leaders controlling the entity were more turkic and later in second bulgarian empire were more slavic?
Yes
The greatest obstacle to the empire's revival was the presence to the south ofthe Danube of the Bulgar khaganate with its capital at Pliska and a southern frontier in the Hebros/Maritza valley only three days march from Constantinople. In 780 the Bulgar state had survived in close proximity to Byzantium for almost a century, taking advantage of the empire's internal problems and wars against the Arabs, and this survival had hardened it into an extremely tough political entity. Its Turkic ruling elite combined the military ferocity of the steppe people they had been with the agricultural resource base of the Slav peasantry they dominated and with the skills of civilization acquired from Greek traders, captives, and defectors.
Mango, Cyril A. 2002. The Oxford history of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.172
The Pliska temple may have been in fact a monument erected to commemorate Krum, as the surviving elements of the building are strikingly similar to a number of similar monuments erected for the Turkic qagans in present-day Mongolia. Four other similar structures have been found in Pliska, Madara, and Preslav, all of rectangular or square shape with a north-south or east-west orientation. For the architecture of the “pagan temples” of Bulgaria, see S.
Curta, F. (2006). The rise of new powers (800-900). In Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250 (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, pp. 111-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Further evidence linking the Balkan Bulgar state to Turkic cultural traditions was the nature of the Bulgars' primary settlement at Pliska, with its resemblance to a steppe encampment, and a Bulgar tradition of stone relief carvings and inscriptions found scattered throughout the eastern Danubian Plain.
P. Hupchick, D., 2017. The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bulgaria at this time had acquired some traits typical of a barbarian state, because the bellicose tribe of the Bulgars had imported the Turkic traditions of the great steppe into the Balkans.
The Old Testament in Byzantium Edited by Paul Magdalino Robert S. Nelson Washington, D.C. :Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection : Distributed by Harvard University Press, c2010. pp. 255
6:04: Ah yes good old 1990's statistics
yeah that demographics are a bit off
@@matijas7994 dobre su
The Demographics are way off. There are no Slav majority areas in Greece
Where do you get all of your Maps and Info? (Your Channel is Amazing man, Keep going!)
You want to say that Bulgaria is the biggest country on the Balkans? This was unexpectedly...
Was*
@@ZeytinciDevleti As we see it is still the biggest
Bulgaria is a bit small. 110 thousand km
Reis yine döktürmüş eline sağlık
Great video!!! 🇷🇸 ❤️ 🇲🇪🇧🇦🇭🇷🇲🇰🇧🇬
maded by a turk SRB
@@KayraAtakanQX 💪💪
@Brotha Box this place populated much very years ago when slavs come here called Dardania and is part of illyria and about that they are Albanians only the religion change and they wanted Albania
@@veljkoobradovic8170 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
5:01 Bulgaristan'a Dİmetoka'nın "hediye" edilmesi
3:34 yeah boii
Bulgarians are originally Turkish.
No. Turkish are orign mongol/African mix
@@PAVLOVICDORDESERBIA The Turks brother with mongols.But African people have no relations with Turks
A mix of Turkic and Slavic that kinda became its own ethnicity
Turkic*
@@PAVLOVICDORDESERBIAu serb nvggas are also persian or arab.
Huns and Bulgars were great Turkic nomads
They had iranian names such as Asparukh and also slavic names such as Malamir and Presian, they were barely turkic by the 8th century.
@@tonit4233 nah
Look
Word of Bulgar is Turkic come from verb of Turkic bulga-(today Turkish=bula-)
As you said they were , they aren't turkic anymore
@@altaiccultureandlanguage6184 it could be perfectly well deriving from bulgeron- an eastern Iranian word meaning person coming from the outskirts
@@tonit4233
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity)
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/
Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full
Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable
However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf
Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/
Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region.
online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars
Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
Wow Good video bro. In sha Allah Bosnians muslims will are a majority in their country the Bosnia!
@Marinko you are wrong, boy. There are 53% Muslims only 31% orthodoxs and 15% catholics. And the population of Orthodox is declinant at the difference of bosniaks that growing every year. It's not good to lie, boy !
And how are you going to do that ?
Missed movement of 1 serbian uprising, and second serbian empire of Jovan Nenad 1526
Amazing video and well put historical facts! Greetings from Serbia!
Ama İlk Bulgar İmparatorluğu zamanında Bulgarlar Türk değilmiydi
Rafael Aktaş evet
Zaten belli zamana kadar ilk Bulgar imparatorluğunu Slav olarak göstermemiş
zaten o kısmı koymadım.
Hayır Türk olanlar Volgada kaldı
@@kadirmestoglu5984 1. Bulgar imp. Da 865 yılına kadar türk
The true Slavic people in this region-Slovenes, received newcomers on their territory in 7th century and lost most of their territory due to so called brotherhood. Ancient and modern Slovenes, Jurij Venelin, Moscau 1830.
POZDRAV IZ HRVATSKE SLAVENSKOJ BRACI‼🇭🇷
Привет из Казахстана, бывшего субъекта Российской империи.
I’m half bosnian (slavic) hello 👋
Çok güzel güngör yazıcıoğlu videosu
insanlar yanlış anlayabilir bence bu yorumu
@@KayraAtakanQX bişi olmaz kanka .d
Like in the Turkey video, you can see maybe some patches of minorities of South Slavs because as a Bosniak myself living in Germany I know that the countries there are facing decline due to many moving to Germany to seek for a better life. It's sadly the truth that ethnic divisions and corruption are still relevant and nobody cares about it.
WORLD's best mapper
:/
I want be world's best mapper
sorry you are worlds best mapper too
video çok güzle olmuş eline sağlık
bu mappinglerde renksiz olan ama isimleri yazan ülkeler neyi temsil ediyor tam olarak, mesela 1:10 da Hırvatistan ,Sırbistan vs mevcut ancak renkli neden değiller
Önemsiz küçük veya Hakkin da hicbir bilgi olmayan (yönetici bayrak vb) demek ama duruma göre farkli anlama da gelebilir kökeni mesela tartışmalı devletler yada kocaman imparatorluklar yanında herseyi belli olmasına rağmen yöneticilerini göstermeye gerek olmacak kadar gereksiz devletler için yada kültürler için de kullanılabilir . Henüz devletesmemis boylar için de kullanılabilir. genelde seyirci anlıyor onu . Duruma gore değişiyor anlayacağın
Amazing work! That nations map in the end was really interesting.
Harika Bir Video Daha
How do you upload so fast?
How do you research, trace, draw and animate so quickly within weeks?
It takes me weeks to complete videos.
ı working very hard.
@@KayraAtakanQX Nice it is very impressive. Good luck on your journey to 100,000 subs! 🇵🇰🇹🇷
En 2020
85,5% bulgares en Bulgarie
83,3% serbes en Serbie
83,1% slovènes en Slovénie
69,8% croates en Croatie
64,2% macédoniens en Macédoine
50,1% bosniaques en Bosnie
45,0% monténégrins au Monténégro
In 2020
85,5% bulgarian in Bulgaria
83,3% serbian in Serbia
83,1% slovene in Slovenia
69,8% croatian in Croatia
64,2% macedonian in Macedonia
50,1% bosniak in Bosnia
45,0% montenegrin in Montenegro
Well a lot of info that is gathered is not that exact.
For example number of Turks and gypsies in Bularia is higher.
In Serbia there is about 300,000 people who did not make a general statement when asked who are they.
Slovenia will not recognize minorities so we can only guess.
A lot of Croatians left Croatia the second they joined EU.
In Bosnia they have calculated even those bosniaks that live outside of Bosnia,and that was a huge issue.
And for Montenegro,people say that there are around 40 percent of those who say that they are Montenegrin but around 45 percent say that they speak Serbian.
@@temistogen Slovenia would not recognised minorities? That's bullshit, is more the other way around (looking at Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia). Italian and Hungarian minority + Roma people (Gypsies) have special (political) rights because they are autochthonous. They have much more rights than Slovene minority in their national countries. Serbs, Bosniaks and Croatians are not autochthonous in Slovenia, but they are included in statistics.
@@valentintapata2268 no,slovenia does not recognize any of the former yugoslav republic ethnicities as minorities.We don't have our schools,our rights and we are nor recognized.In serbia slovenians have dedicated schools,and much more rights than vice versa.
@Fg 98 nobody really knows how much people live in Bosnia and on unrecognized Kosovo.
I tought that Albanians are Slavs too but seems that i mistaken! Great work
Why did you make it seem like Bulgaria randomly spawned out of nowhere in the end of the 800’s meanwhile it was there since the 650’s…
Abi hatırladığım kadarıyla Macarlar gibi Bulgarlar da türktü.
Din değiştirdikleri için Türk saymıyor beyfendi aynısını Türkler için de söylediğimizde kuduruyor ama 😂
Mesut Yeseni Burada dikkat edersen 1. Bulgar İmparatorluğunun belli bir kısmı yok yani slavlaşmış hâlini koymuş
Tengrici olmayan tüm kabilelere türk değil diyelim hatta müslümanlara arap budistlerede tibetli diyelim
Macarların kurucu unsuru olan on kabileden yedisi fin-ugor, üçü türk-ogur kökenli. Hristiyanlık resmi din olduktan sonra yerel slav, cermen ve rumen unsurlarıyla karışım olmuş. Moğol istilası ve osmanlı fetihleri yüzünden nüfusları inanılmaz derecede düştüğü için genetik payları Volga çevresinden biraz uzak. Ama Sekellerde belirgin
din değiştirmekle alakası yok Gagavuzlar Altaylar Yakutlar Çuvaşlar Tuvalılar Hakaslar müslüman değil ama Türk sayılıyorlar çünkü konuştukları dil Türkçe gelenek ve görenekleri Türk ayriyetten Türk olduklarını kabul ediyorlar Ama Bulgarlar ise Türk olduklarını kabul etmiyorlar biz slavız diyorlar hatta Türklerden nefret ediyorlar ayriyetten konuştukları dil Türkçe değil Slavca ve gelenek görenek leri Zaman içinde Slavlaşmış bu yüzden Bulgarlar Türk kabul edilmiyor farklı bir dine mensup olmalarıyla alakalı değil yani😉
First Bulgaria was Turkic Empire not Slavic
Hayır knk Slav türk olan Bulgar kabilesi ile Slav olan Bulgarlar farklı mesela türk kazaklar ile Slav kazakların farklı olması gibi (Türkçe konuşabilirsin bura türk kanalı)
@@mutluorge1232 aga devlet kurulduğunda türk devletiydi onu diyorum
But after we accept Christianity, we are no longer Turks
kardeşim biliyorsun bunları benimde aşırı merakım var ama argumanlara nereden ulaşacağımı bilmediğim için bilgi edinmede eksikler yaşıyorum eğer yorumumu okuyorsan tavsiye verebilirmisin rica etsem ?
7th century Balkan Romans and Illyrians- why do I hear boss music?
Отлично! Как всегда лайк!
Это что за карта Европа или азия
89% Croats in Croatia your informations are wrong.
Povijest i Geografija TV
the other information thats wrong is that its showing ethnic macedonians in greece when there isn’t me myself im not greek, macedonia had serbians, bulgarians, and not alot of greeks.
You got something wrong towards the end, the leader of the Republic of North Macedonia is Stevo Pendarovski.
It is only mistake and it is not my mistake i used wikipedia . Wikipedia showed this.
@@KayraAtakanQX
Understandable.
Why did you miss Terter dynasty in Bulgaria? Dynasty had Turk origin but are you sured that there was Turk culture and Terters weren't slavicisated? And you didn't miss period 865-991 when Bulgaria was ruled by Krum's dynasty which had Turk origin as Terter dynasty. And Tsardom of Bulgaria was ruled by German dynasty.
It isnt same . German Dynasty just ruled country but turkic-nomadic countries is different others . Dynasty for state in Europa but state for Dynasty in nomadic countries . The kut faithy is base of nomadic empires. we using when searching central asian nomad history . Kut faithy id confusing topic you can research . But i can say terter Dynasty impressed bulgaria . It is symbol of cuman dominance on balkans. It is important for turkic history and not bulgarian state .
Krums Dynasty is turkic but it slavized after 865
Yine mükemmel bir video izlemekten sıkılmam
İ just love this
everybody gangsta till serbia form an empire
and then collapse
st3f4n
greece was replaced with serbia.
Serbian mediaval states : Bosnia, Raska, Zahumlje, Paganija, Travunija, Zeta (Duklja) and parts of Ragusa
In the 1000s Bosnia not anymore we were politicly free
sonunda bildiğim bir millet hamdolsun
You showed Carantania but did not show Principality of Lower Pannonia although it was Carantanian principality.
I showed lower pannonia pls look again .
@@KayraAtakanQX it had other borders and other years of existence unlike video about West Slavs.
@@alexangelo1998 pannonians and carantanians arent west slav it video is correct other video is wrong.
@@KayraAtakanQX I mean that Lower Pannonia existed in 846-875 and had such territory en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Lower_Pannonia#/media/File:Count_Kocel's_territories.PNG
And Duchy of Pannonian Croatia existed in 790-900. You subscribed Pannonian Croatia as Lower Pannonia but it is other state. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Pannonian_Croatia
@@KayraAtakanQX Carantanian Slavs formed a majority in Carantania, Lower Panonia and Carniola (another principality, which you didn't show). They soon came under rule of Bavarians and Franks, some of them were part of Nitra and Great Moravia. Their descendants are Slovenes, Kajkavian Croats and minorities (+assimilated people) in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia. Slovenian language is a mix between West Slavic and South Slavic, South Slavic component being stronger.
Thanks my Turkish friend
@Sultan Süleyman I owner is turk
@Sultan Süleyman I :( no
@Sultan Süleyman I if istria is italy then turks should leave anatolia LOL
Reis sen iki günde 1000 kare fln yapıyorsun ben 2 günde haritayı anca hazır ediyorum
Bulgaria is earliest than all slav countries official is same place and name from 681 but actually is earlier around 560 got some elder scrolls which got info about that .... and they aren't the elder scrolls of skyrim:D
I like your ethnic maps, but aren't Goranis different?
Yes theys are different so didnt show in this video . Bosnians and goranis lived together in southern kosovo . And if you see i showed a white piece in southern kosovo . Theys are goranis .d
es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goranis#/media/Archivo%3AKrahina_e_Gor%C3%ABs_(Gora_region).png
@@KayraAtakanQX they r all serbian tribes,.....
@@KayraAtakanQX Goranis are just Muslim Slavs
@@KayraAtakanQX Ne saçmalıyorsun? Attığın sitede bile Goranilerin Bir Güney Slav halkı olduğunu yazıyor zaten.
Byzantium : you mean the history of the BARBARIANS
Turkic Bulgars destroyed Eastern Romans many times
@@papazataklaattiranimam I mean byzantine empire called them barbarians
@@papazataklaattiranimam and no they didn't destroyed byzantine empire the did take a lot of terratory from it but never destroyed it like Byzantium did
@@dkgamers1385 Turks were horror story of Romans
@@papazataklaattiranimam turks were scary especially turkic tribes like the kumans
Do history of Ukraine or macedonia
I just want to say that when Serbia was formed, those 4 little states were Serbian vassals and provinces
Nope, DAI incorrectly coorelates the ruler's ethnicity with the erhnicity of the people living in those states.
Out of those 4 states :
Pagania - integrated into Croatia
Zachlumia - was once a vassal of both Croatia and Serbia and the country was divided in Croatian and Serbian spheres of influence
Travunia - integrated into Serbia
Dioclea - integrated into Serbia, but would form it@s own kingdom under Bodin and become the basis for the country of Montenegro.
no they werent,they were byzantian vassals
@@kristijanEX cortect
yine harika
Isn’t it time to put the name of the music you use in the description?
It is in description already :/
Merak ediyorum, bir video yapmak ne kadar zaman alıyor?
çok
South slavs fighting all day with austrians, hungarians, wallachians, ottomans, venecians, latins, italians, albanians, greeks, themselves, the USA and germany. This is what is happening in the entire video.
Ragusa respublikasi?
1:24 Bulgaria just spawned
Bulgarian empire is from 680
ok but bulgarians were turks back then not slavic
marinko čavara isnt and never was the president of Bosnia, curently the president of presidency is Šefik Džaferović, before him it was Željko Komšić, and before him Milorad Dodik, otherwise great video
The start of Bulgaria should be at 681, even then when Bulgars created the country, the main population were indeed slavs.
855 is when the cyrillic alphabet was created in the First Bulgarian Empire not when Bulgaria was established.
Not only that but the slavs did partially participate in the governing of the country as tribal chieftains largely kept their authority after the arrival of the Bulgars. Slavs also made up the majority of the infantry of the Bulgarian military. The correct way of viewing the early First Bulgarian Empire is as a Union between the local slavs and the Bulgars.
we are not slavs or turkic
@Öksökö danuban bulgars didn't came from Volga bulgaria both of them are successor states of old great Bulgaria and yes we know the bulgars were not Slavic even tho they mostly got assimilated into Slavic culture after accepting Christianity and created a Slavic alphabet
He was Turkic empire or Turco-Slavic empire
@Çağdaş
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity)
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/
Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full
Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable
However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf
Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/
Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region.
online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars
Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
güzel olmuş
Sonunda hesabina erisebilmissin :)
@@KayraAtakanQX hesabım var da pcye geçemiyorum hep :/ telefonda da açık değil hesap ama sağol yine de
the SERBIAN EMPIRE is BIGGER than in the video
please check the wikipedia or cenaennia historical atlas . every sources telling like in this video.
aren't albanians of slavic origin?
No
Yes!
Dud there are many mistakes ! Especialy with North macedonia !
For example ?
@@KayraAtakanQX the video is 95% accurate for me as a Bulgarian.
Türk tarihinin videosu tarzında Latinlerin tarihini lütfen
O zamanki bulgarlar türk olarak biliniyordu Avrupada
865 öncesi evet zaten video da boyle
ExcUse me Bulğars as Slavs????
Omurtag and Asparuh.....
Mongols!
@Lethean Turks as an ethnic group don't exist anymore.
Kazakhs are the cleanest of them
Turks were always Mongols until the Greeks mainly made them Europeans, Slavs and Persians did the same.
Turkic never existed you were pure Mongols
You can't explain these much similarities and commons, except if you admit Turkic peoples don't even exist
Turks from Turkey don't exist too, Turks aren't Asian looking by any mean
kanka sen kırımlı mısın?.kırım türkçesi biliyor musun merak ettiğim bir soru var da.
Değilim
Nobody:
Bulgaria: I LOVE CREATING HUGE EMPIREES AAAAННН
1:41 Bulgarların en büyük yüz ölçümü
Draguvites su staro pleme Dragovici, samo grci nemaju glasove da to tako i napisu..
Otvori malo knjigu Srpske povelje Grckih vladara, uporedi kako su upisivali nase toponime
Aaaaammaaaaan allllahiiim
Anadolu tarihi gelsin
Var
Bosna için burada olanlar+1
Croatia became a kingdom in 925.
2:02 is not first Bulgarian then Macedonian Empire, Capital Skopje and Emperor was Samuil, shit od history maps
Banate of Bosnia is Arpad origin
arpadların vassalı sadece.
Mapleri nasıl yapıyorsun
Carantina
(Franks)
Carantania (Part of Slavic Samo's Empire), Independent Carantania, Carantania a Bavarian vassal, Carantania a Frankish vassal, Frankish provinces,... + (Caranatanian) Slavic principalities of Carniola and Lower Panonia + some Carantanian Slavs were part of Nitra, Great Moravia and later Kingdom of Croatia,...
Descendants are Slovenes, Kajkavian Croats, Slovene minorities (+ assimilated people) in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia.
Yes all these groups are related to them, but by far the closest people to carantanians are slovenes.
@@mrhippo6040 There were three Principalities of Carantanian Slovenes: Karantanija, Karniola and Lower Pannonia (ruled by a Moravian Prince). Kajkavian Croats speak Kajkavian which is a Slovenian dialectic group, they were assimilated by Croatians. I was speaking about Alpine Slavs/Carantanian Slavs and not other groups. Edit: Minorities that I mentioned are Slovenes living outside of Slovenia, but they are not emigrants. A lot of Austrians, Italians, Croatians and Hungarians are descendants of assimilated (Carantanian) Slovenes.
Çok iyi bir video