Immunity Exterminated! 😳 $9.5M! POPO Pest Control Co. Terminates Unarmed Citizen on Ground! Bodycam!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 жов 2024
- 2020.03.02
9th US Circuit Court of Appeals
Unpublished Opinion: casetext.com/c...
Uncensored Body Camera Footage: www.tmz.com/20...
$1.5M to Parents: www.azcentral....
$8M to Wife: www.fox10phoen...
Officer Charged But Acquitted: www.fox10phoen...
Other Interesting Cases:
Gangsta CPS Loses Immunity! 😳 Demands the Right to Lie to Violate Citizens & Kidnap Kids! • Gangsta CPS Loses Immu...
-----
I'm just trying to be a dad after my kids were abducted.
Why I am the Father in Exile:
How to Fight Corrupt Family Court (Expose it!)
• How to Fight Corrupt F...
Voter Fraud and Abduction Admission Caught on Court TV in NV
• Voter Fraud and Abduct...
Judicial Misconduct & Rights Violations Caught on Court TV - Santa Clara, CA Judge Roberta Hayashi
• Voter Fraud, Judicial ...
Ring Camera! Kidnapping Coppers Exposed! 😳 Admit I Reported Corruption But Refuse to Investigate! • Kidnapping Coppers Exp...
Kidnapper Judge Cindy Hendrickson Revokes Illegal Order 😳 (2023)! Admits Denying Me Due Process! • Kidnapper Judge Cindy ...
Secret Judge Club Exposed 😳 at Corrupt California State Bar Meeting! (2023) • Secret Judge Club Expo...
Santa Clara County California Superior Court Judges Who Deny Due Process and Participate in Misconduct and Felonies: Roberta Hayashi, Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Brooke Blecher, Thomas Kuhnle. Transcripts and Filings Will be Released Publicly on this Channel.
#fatherson #missingsomeone #pitbull #dogshorts #dogjokes #familycourt #vegas #vegaslocals #clarkcounty #nevada #nevergiveup #dogdad #corruption #exposed #california #santaclara #southlaketahoe #funny #entertainment #comedy #viral #music #trending #shortvideo #fun
Unpublished Opinion: casetext.com/case/sweet-v-langley
Uncensored Body Camera Footage: www.tmz.com/2017/12/07/mesa-police-involved-shooting-bodycam-philip-brailsford-not-guilty-daniel-shaver/
$1.5M to Parents: www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2021/07/22/daniel-shavers-parents-settle-mesa-1-5-million/8064237002/
$8M to Wife: www.fox10phoenix.com/news/deadly-police-shooting-city-of-mesa-to-pay-8m-to-wife-of-daniel-shaver
Officer Charged But Acquitted: www.fox10phoenix.com/news/ex-mesa-police-officer-found-not-guilty-of-second-degree-murder-reckless-manslaughter
Gangsta CPS Loses Immunity! 😳 Demands the Right to Lie to Violate Citizens & Kidnap Kids! ua-cam.com/video/llXqlKB_AME/v-deo.htmlsi=q974eNTgxew4MKqE
Ring Camera! Kidnapping Coppers Exposed! 😳 Admit I Reported Corruption But Refuse to Investigate! ua-cam.com/video/ONUR0GL9Voc/v-deo.html
Kidnapper Judge Cindy Hendrickson Revokes Illegal Order 😳 (2023)! Admits Denying Me Due Process! ua-cam.com/video/hRaX0g7rgS8/v-deo.html
Secret Judge Club Exposed 😳 at Corrupt California State Bar Meeting! (2023) ua-cam.com/video/LHRTQh0WTYk/v-deo.html
I'm just trying to be a dad after my kids were abducted.
Why am I the Father in Exile:
How to Fight Corrupt Family Court (Expose it!)
ua-cam.com/video/pVgudZtNYiQ/v-deo.html
Voter Fraud and Abduction Admission Caught on Court TV in NV
ua-cam.com/video/J9FeWPKEFo8/v-deo.html
Judicial Misconduct & Rights Violations Caught on Court TV - Santa Clara, CA Judge Roberta Hayashi
ua-cam.com/video/Zgog-NLFyC8/v-deo.html
Santa Clara County California Superior Court Judges Who Deny Due Process and Participate in Misconduct and Felonies: Roberta Hayashi, Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Brooke Blecher, Thomas Kuhnle. Transcripts and Filings Will be Released Publicly on this Channel.
Greetings content creator. Was wondering, how do you get these court videos to publish on your channel? Thanks in advance for your reply. All the best!
It was murder for sure!
Hey bro, I understand what your doing with your keyword terms at the bottom of the description, using certain ones to extend the reach and all that, which personally I think this needs to be seen far and wide to help you get justice, but using terms like comedy or entertainment and the like I just worry could you used against you in someway but any lawyer with the average Iq and not the average lawyer with a shoe size Iq. So just be careful dude. Keep up your work and stay strong.
@freewillchoice8052 "hello content creator" hello AI why don't you go tell your Indian overlords to F off an stop trying to take this serious stuff to just make a quick buck...I hope I'm wrong but I really feel like this is exactly what your doing and who you are....
Holy crap, that man was begging for his life and they shot him in cold blood. If the man who shot him, wearing full body armor with an assault rifle, really feared for his life, he should have never become a cop. He shouldn't even own a gun. Mans on the ground, crying, crawling towards you as you commanded, and you're the one that's so scared you have to use deadly force? The guy giving the commands, really? You should be forced to go through that and see how well you'd comply. (I would make sure that the guy with the gun doesn't have bullets, but I wouldn't let you know that.)
The guy was begging for his life and these cops just murdered him.
I'm gonna have nightmares tonight after watching that body cam today.
@@fatherinexile I'm sort of wishing I hadn't watched it.
He was found not guilty by jury. Citizens on jury are the problem also.
Don’t want police violence but vote to allow it
I remember when this happened. The cop has the guy crawling on the ground telling him to be moving forward, but also telling him not to move the wrong way. This was a setup and the guy was murdered. Disgusting how the cop wasn't even charged, he should he rotting in prison.
The hardest part of the body cam for me was the vindictive orders that were being shouted at this poor man.
Wasn't the cop charged with second degree and acquitted?
He was, by a jury. And then he reapplied to get hired to get a pension.
And justice for all.
@@eshootziscrs2868and to add insult to injury he got a lifetime pension for PTSD over him shooting an innocent person. If you watch the trial he had zero remorse for his actions and came over as nothing more than a cold blooded and calculated killer.
@@eshootziscrs2868that’s horrible. But still better that the jury acquited him rather than qualified immunity
@@89bazoly
I forgive the jury, I didn't hear the case.
I can't forgive the city for giving him a pension for life.
His conscience will be the true jury and his sentence life. We can expect no more.
The judges were having none of that BS. The cops’ attorney was left stuttering half the time. What an embarassing argument to even make.
It seems their sole strategy is to try to get the case kicked out on immunity, and if that fails, pay a big settlement to stay away from a jury, which would likely destroy them.
_"The judges were having none of that BS"_
Sure, but at the end of the day the officer was found not guilty, cops rarely face real consequences.
@@davelordythat just means the defense got very lucky and/or planted someone on the jury. It went to trial and only a for hire would let that cop walk.
Article 6, clause 1
Article 1, section 8, clause 17
Article 4, section 4
Article 2, section 4
Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2
FRCP 38
I thought they gave him immunity for shooting Daniel..or am I wrong. I know they didn't charge him which is insane to anyone who watched the video. It was a murder..period
I’m loving these rejections of qualified immunity. This case was so crazy. That man was murdered by the government and his family was left with nothing. And nobody is in prison for this horrific crime.
All that man did was walk out of a hotel room! Life ended! Family destroyed! Nobody is responsible? Three or four cops had guns! The dead man did not! You do not have to point a finger at anyone! The evidence is there! The police shot an unarmed man! But they are not responsible! With a hooded wink! The murderers walk!
They sued and the wife and children were awarded 8 or 9 million but their their family has been disemboweled because they will never have their husband and father to consult for strength and comfort again
Family got 8 million. Us Arizona taxpayers get to pay Brailsford 30k a year for ptsd for him being a murderer.
American government is a cancer. No accountability ever. Not with local cops, not with state agencies, and certainly not with cesspools like the Veterans Administration. I’m posting these to educate the masses and hopefully provoke some change. Thanks for watching.
The cops are trying to avoid the "Three men enter a bank and one pulls a gun to rob the bank. All three are charged with bank robery because of participating with knowledge" All officers on scene at the time of the murder need to be charged as participating subjects.
Shooter found not guilty and he’s out looking for another victim as of today
So good to hear a judge say that! There doesn't need to be exact case law! How about COMMON MF SENSE!!!
Agreed!
How can you crawl with your legs crossed
What I learned from this,
If the cops show up at your door,
Be prepared to fight for your life.
Bingo!
Don’t open your door don’t talk to police they’re not your friend they’re not there to do anything good for you don’t open the door
Dont answer the door.
Never open the door!!
Absolutely. The cops are NOT there to help you.
That middle judge said it best, "What if that was a child on a tricycle?" I am appalled just hearing that attorney's argument that someone called 911. Just because someone calls 911 and the police get dispatched with information, it does not mean it is factual. Anybody can call and make an allegation to 911 that could be a mentally challenged person hallucinating events that never happened. The alleged suspect victim was given a lose lose situation escalated by these officers by their shear cowardice and neglect of sworn duty to protect the rights of all parties involved.
911 calls to the police are hearsay.
I think this was the case where the guy was crawling down the hallway begging them not to kill him.
It is! Bodycam and news stories in description and pinned comment.
This case was outright murder. No charges for the cops. At least they lost here.
One officer was prosecuted but the jury acquitted him 🤷♂️
And that is why no one trusts any part of the justice system.
Yeah, one officer was acquitted, but the department got to pay the wife and kids 8 million dollars.
yea no the cop WAS charged with 2nd degree murder and found NOT guilty, so he can't even be charged again this court is moot at this point.
Most definitely and Philip Brailsford gets to walk away free.
Thank you for posting this. They murdered that poor kid and got away with it.
Again
Bruh even he knew the argument was so asinine the second the judges said so its the victims fault for not crawling right??? Cops lawyer tries to hold back every giggle in his soul like "yea i know your honor help me lie fam" lol
“Help me lie fam!” 😂 what a great quote u just made up! Love it!
😂😂😂😂😂
“The suspect must understand the seriousness of the situation.” The fact that the agency hired officers prone to violent random hysterical behavior does seem to be a pretty serious situation.
great point !
Yup!
We're to trust incompetent feckless incompetent lunatic tyrants!
Makes some of us feel safer already!
Especially an idiot who has mental hysteria who was given a badge and a gun, and then turned loose in public.
Maybe they should allow tyrants to show up to work on drugs and alcohol abuse as well.
Lol!
I mean, qualified impunity and all!
Smh!
Don't forget there is a IQ cap on hiring cops they weed out smart people and only hire idiots.
End qualified immunity and Terry v Ohio and Pennsylvania v Mimms NOW!!
🎯
The lawyer for police always kill me. The guy should be in jail. The warnings were on video. This was an execution.
100%. If they were thay afraid the guy was armed they should have told him to just lay completely still and not to move at all. Then cops move in slowly and put the cuffs on the guy. Instead they set him up, telling him not to move but having him moving forward.
Why does everyone feel the need to attack the lawyer? Personally I would quit and find another job, but maybe he can't if he is under contract. Can a lawyer be under threat of contract and lose his license if he doesn't fully represent his client? Maybe he can't quit. I don't know but the lawyer isn't the guilty party the murdering cop is. Someone has to represent the murdering cop as everyone is entitled to representation.
No but the lawyer is making a bullshit argument that Would make this OK for other officers to do this is not just one person these things become caselaw and then get used over and over and over and
@@Ginger-g8j Lawyers make an oath to defend their client to the best of their ability. Would you want a lawyer to act contrary to that? I certainly wouldn't want a lawyer to represent me that wasn't doing their best.
It is qualified immunity that is the problem, not lawyers put in a position to defend it.
The lawyer has to defend the indefensible. It is his job, disgusting as that sounds.
I remember this body cam and watching again it legit made me sick. Ive rarely been that angry on behalf of another
It made me sick too today 😢 I had to take some deep breaths.
was this the one in the hotel or apartment building ?
@@freewillchoice8052Yes, in the hall. He was in shorts and a T shirt crawling when they murdered him.
What gets me is that SINCE THERE IS NO CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW ON SHOOTING A UNARMED MAN 5 TIMES WHO IS FOLLOWING COMMANDS AND CRAWLING TO YOU THEN HE SHOULD GET Q.A. YOU THINK COMMON PHUCKING SENSE SHOULD KICK IN.....NOPE!
Crazy right?!
From watching a few of these type videos, it appears judges are fed up with police misconduct
Good to see. Now judges need to realize how often and easily cops lie!
🎯
doesn't matter the cop was already found NOT guild of 2nd degree murder so he can't even be charged again. what is this court for?
@@MrDhalli6500
This was the civil trial that follows after the criminal trial. Cops don't have immunity in criminal court, only civil. The lower court denied qualified immunity, the cop is appealing.
The widow got $8 million from the city, $0 from the cop.
@al1383
Remember the courts created qualified immunity, and unconstitutional policing under RAS.
If the courts are angry it should be directed at themselves, they are the biggest cause of this mess.
@@MrDhalli6500 so there you have it, murder is legal.
If the CO was surprised he should have arrested the officer. He didn't, he's liable.
Why do the defense lawyers defending immunity always sound like they spent 15 minutes studying their case? They all seem to sound like they quickly figured out one defense and their egos told them, "You got this! In and Out if 15 minutes! Then you go in the law books as a hero!"
There sole tactic is to delay delay delay and if immunity is lost then pay pay pay before forced in front of a jury.
Because they dont have a defense, they try wording things to fit into not being a violation.
It’s because they are attempting to defend the indefensible, they grasp at straws because that is all they have got. If the lawyer wants to know what precedent disallows this shooting he should read Garner v Tennessee which set the precedent you can’t shoot an unarmed person on the ground when they don’t pose a direct threat.
That’s because their arguing the indefensible!!
If an officer doesn't know if his actions are un constitutional, he should not do it. Also, knowing the consistution would help greatly in knowing.
I don’t think it mattered in this case. The officers INTENT was to kill!! Period!!
They don't know the Constitution, most can't tell you the 5 rights in the 1st Admendment. They need 6 weeks @ least in police school to go over the Constitution since they swear to uphold it. I'm not against good police, but most are clueless to how the law works or what is even said in the Constitution. They should be tested on the law and actually have a degree of some sort about the law, not just training on how to detain a person and preserve their safety. Things need to change.
@RozeechildRN I agree the police academy gives one day for the consistution. If it was about protect and serve, they would know the consistution.
Appreciate the update on this case. This one drove me mad. Too bad the cop is still free, living.
This is disgusting how these lawyers are trying to let cops get away with murder
This attorney is terrible. He couldn't argue his way out of a ticket.
His last words were "please don't shoot me" as he was crying for his life.
I thought defense lawyers were just to make sure the defendant isn't railroaded this lawyer should lose his bar license cuz he's flat out making s*** up
Lawyers rarely get in trouble even though there are rules about candor to the court and not bringing meritless legal arguments to waste the courts time.
If your child was on trial would you rather the lawyer gave the best defense he could or just make sure your kid isn't railroaded too badly?
Even if your kid is guilty, odds are you find excuses and reasons why it's not their fault and you would be very glad the lawyer helped get an acquittal.
Btw, the officer that pulled the trigger was charged, tried and found not guilty. Pretty sure the criminal trial is already over.
AGREED!!
@@Anomoomin do you mean like the 4000 exonerated people who were wrongfully convicted of crimes like murder when they were innocent?
Or are you suggesting someone like Kyle Rittenhouse just say, yep I did it, guess we don't need a trial. Some idiots would say that was murder, most say that was entirely self defense. I guess without a trial and a real defense the truth will be whatever you like?
@@Anomoomin
Then why are you arguing? Or did you mean to ask it as a question of something you don't understand?
You don't see the point in exactly what you are doing?
I'm not sure I can help, but I'll give it a shot.
You think something, you even believe it. Yet here we are, having different perspectives. This is why we argue, we listen, we share we discuss. Because even a video can show different things.
Ever hear of " one movie, two screens"? There is a famous example of a Japanese movie shown from two different perspectives. The exact same things telling a completely different story.
It is perfectly fine to not defend yourself, just don't cry about the outcomes being unfair.
Honestly I don't know exactly what you are trying to say, I suspect it's not as pointless or ridiculous as it might seem.
It would be wonderful if people were always honest but unfortunately this is the real world. Not even the police, the prosecutor or the judge can be or should be trusted to be honest.
When you get politicians, judges and cops to be honest, we will stop arguing.
That's how I see it, you can't, we won't, now what?
The defense attorney said the other party in the room was given the same verbal commands and successfully followed them. The commands given to the female were completely different. I can’t believe the judges didn’t catch that.
I remember this story and it does make me feel slightly better that the qualified immunity was not granted here and the police were held accountable for their haneos actions. This was murder, plain and simple.
They weren’t held accountable, they were acquitted and got away with murder.
@@digitalwasabi2 I did not realize they were acquitted. What an absolute atrocity the justice system is.
Anyone waving his arms around like this attorney was knows he is in trouble and struggling to create an argument. The body language would have been read by the judges.
Jesus Christ! Anyone who carries a firearm for self defense knows there has to be a reasonable belief that they face an imminent threat. A government sanctioned pirate such as these cops should absolutely, 100%know.
i remember that. the dead victim DID realize the gravity of the situation. there was NO good reason that he was given those ridiculous commands. he shouldve been told to lay flat, arms out, etc, & cuffed & searched. the cop is barking immediate orders to a guy clearly submitting, cooperating, & very scared. its almost as if the cop gave super complicated, nit picky orders with death threats so that he could shoot & still be able to CHA, or, he actually wanted to shoot, so made commands & threats so that he would likely make a mistake. under those circumstances, who would NOT make some little mistake, or make a small movement that is a reflex or done by habit or unconciously?? do cops not know that being THAT fearful makes ppl mess or "flub up".??
The bodycam is so so so hard to watch. That poor man!
the coward cop had him playing simon says, " crawl like a dog"!, oops didn;t say "Simon Says " BLAM BLAM BLAM !!!
It’s crazy to think that even these judges believe the shooter was a hair trigger psychopath and he didn’t even get convicted of reckless manslaughter let alone freakin 2nd degree murder. Honestly the more I see these “officers” get away with murder I start to believe the conspiracy theory that ringers fall into the jury box in favor of the officer period end of story. Idk HOW you can know what that man did to shriver and not think he was ATLEAST reckless.
The officers stated that they made Shaver crawl to them because they “could have been shot thru the door by a possible threat”. Yet after they shot him they immediately run right up in front of the door.
Great point!
This is what Madison feared , the idea that if a right is not exactly established that right doesn’t exist.
I like this talk about the superiors being held responsible.
Tha lack of training and oversight ( and consequences)is a huge problem in law enforcement
Agreed!
No.
This is their training.
It's disturbing to say the least and it must end.
We The People must Abolish and Disband the F.O.P. As an Unconstitutional organization and Govern ourselves as it was intended to be under the Constitution.
they are trained. they just dont give af..
They are trained to act this way. They are doing what their told.
It’s seems to me that this is the most blatant case of a cop desperately wanting to shoot someone. When he saw his first opportunity he pumped 5 bullets into an innocent unarmed man crawling in his boxers , sobbing while pleading and found NOT GUILTY by a jury. Holy cow !!
There is a special place in Hell for that man...
In you read the constitution, article 6 paragraph 2, an officer shall uphold the articles and treaties of the constitution .The Bill of Rights, amendment 5 , says " Nor shall ....., not be deprived of life , liberty or property with out due process of law .
Surely the constitution and Bill of Rights must be the first notice of duty for a police officer .
If the notice has been given to the officer.
You suggest the officers have read and are capable of comprehending something that limits their authority.
@@eshootziscrs2868they are required knowledge, to atleast having read the bill of rights and swear to it, before becoming an executioner of the state...
@@Rob_Moilanen
Required how?
Is there a test that if they fail they will face consequences and punishment?
You can say they are required because it is something you dearly NEED to believe. But can you offer any real, tangible and unquestionable proof that such a requirement is upheld?
The reality we see in video after video, thousands and tens of thousands of times, the reality suggests that officers not only don't know the constitution but that they have zero interest in learning or upholding the principles put forth in the constitution.
Here's an analogous situation.
Years ago I took a class to get a professional license. The first thing the instructor said was this. If you want to know how to do this job, you are in the wrong place. If you know nothing at all about this industry but want a license in the industry, you are in the right class.
I'm not here to teach you the job, I'm only here to make sure you can pass the test.
This is what government regulation really means.
I didn't have to know how to do the job, do the job safely or correctly. I only needed to know the answers to the questions asked, I missed two, got a license and was considered an authority because of that. Cops get training. Trained how not to get caught violating rights, taught what can be excused not what is necessary.
Trained how not to leave incriminating marks, how to mute or remove body cam, how to answer questions without giving answers......
You say cops are required to know and understand something you can't even prove they are required to read. And every bit of factual evidence available as empirical and indisputable on video, says exactly the opposite. Why would you believe they are "required" except you really want, maybe you need it to be true?
But what if it isn't?
What if the top most law enforcement agent of the world said, no, cops are not required to know, understand of interpret the constitution, just the laws. Would you be shocked?
Currently as far as we are concerned the order of law enforcement goes president, Director of the Department of Justice, The attorney general.....
Trump famously said regarding red flag laws, take the guns first, due process second.
Clearly not in alignment with the constitution, the DoJ and Attorney General have backed equally unconstitutional positions. They lied to the people regarding matters of national importance and acted as the armed enforcers of unconstitutional policies put forth by the government.
Is the president required to know, understand and uphold the constitution?
Maybe we want to think so but since George Washington every single president has found the constitution to be a burden and obstacle for their own desires. Every single president has tried to erode and pervert the constitution for one purpose or another, always shielded in benevolence and protection but in reality motivated by cowardice and authoritarianism.
Lincoln decided to suspend the constitution and override the very basis of it. Roosevelt stripped citizens of their rights, suspended/repealed the constitution in order to lock up innocent citizens without charges, trials or any form of due process.
The list is long and expensive. The crimes against the constitution, indisputable and obvious. Yet these crimes have been sanctioned and warranted by the courts, another branch of the government.
.
I'd love to agree with you and know that if a cop actually violated the constitution that officer would face criminal and civil consequences. The fact is, they don't. The fact is there is nothing you can point me to that will make me believe there is such a requirement. If there is, please share.
But I think I can show you ten videos, all new within the last week, showing officers who either don't know the constitution/law or don't care to abide by it because they clearly don't have to.
Give me that thing I can point to and have these officers charged. Show me the consequences, the charges of not knowing the constitution that one would expect if your claim had merit.
I would love for it to be so but I find no actual evidence that it is.
I still don't understand how that insane psychopath, known as a cop, was acquitted on his murder charge! There was absolutely no reason to k*ll a man who was in his underwear, clearly not armed, and trying desperately to comply with bizarre and conflicting commands!
The mcsc judge disallowed evidence against the shooter, Brailsford. One was that Brailsford used his own rifle. The barrel was engraved with "Your F++k+d.
@paulhanson4676 actually the dust cover on the ejection port, but yeah. Any juror who saw that video should have seen right through all their games though.
It must really suck to be that defense attorney.
Abolish Qualified Immunity....And the Judges Immunity Must Go Away Also!
Yes, Judge, of it had been a 3 year old on a tricycle, and they had shot him, the police would still feel that was ok, because they are the police and they have no obligation to honor any law, anywhere.
Not even their own policies!
@@fatherinexile Amen. There is no situation that the police cannot or will not make worse.
Wow.
How fast he went to trying to throw the one officer under the bus when he saw he was losing!
Amazing how this lawyer tries an all out argument to safe a murderer,blame the dead man.
And this is what a lawyer who argued in bad faith looks like and acts. This is NOT what the founding fathers intended at all.
My favorite part about these hearings is that the cop’s whole defense is, I didn’t know that what I did was illegal. Anyone here able to use that excuse when accused of a crime, any crime, m*rd@r maybe, would it work for you?
HOW IN THE F.ng HELL DID YOU DECIDE TO DEFEND THIS EGREGIOUS ACT OF VIOLENCE AT AN UNARMED INNOCENT MAN WHO DIDN'T COMMIT A CRIME. I'm sorry counselor you are not a good person, you are as evil as this evil officer. 😔😠
Unfortunately, this yammering idiot, is just doing his job, albeit very poorly, in pleading the controlling Sgt case, that he is entitled to immunity for having set the rules to which another officer violated the defendant rights and executed the defendant....
AGREED!!!
Without access to competent defence we may as well have mob rule. Even if it turns the stomach of the lawyers defending these awful officers it's his job and their right.
The cops didn't go to prison, but that's the fault of a broken system where to many of the population still believe cops tell no lies and do no wrong, combined with the ludicrous invention of qualified immunity by the supreme court.
I saw the video and the guy who was shot was so scared. The police officer used intimidation tactics and failed to de escalate the situation. I think the worst part is that the officer got disability
These lawyers are so full of ship……. I know it’s their job, but the audacity of the people to pretend they shouldn’t be held accountable……. Hucksters and scammers
We have a 2nd Amendment in this country WTF!! As Americans we have a right to keep and bear arms and shall not be infringed!! When a gun comes into the situation it doesn't mean shoot first and ask questions later.
Flat out murder
I wonder how many times the panel watched the body cam video before this hearing.
End all qualified immunity
Agreed!
Dam those judges have to work hard to get a straight honest answer from a lawyer. More power to then however.
These lawyers need to be held accountable too!
How is it not clearly established that is not a threat, that you cannot kill them just because you're police officer?
One has to wonder what these justices really think and say to themselves when watching the American Gestapo at work.
Attorney trying to fool the judges
As the people were on the ground, face down, hands out and open, why couldn't the officers go and take the subjects into custody?
So cop didn't know he wasn't suppose to shoot someone unarmed on the floor?
2 minutes in and this psychopath is arguing that deadly force can be used just because a person does not comply? What a disgusting and evil person he must be to even consider that to not be pure, disgusting insanity. I just watched body cams and camera footage of another case where a female cop shot a "suspect" for not complying and she was charged with attempted murder. (Unfortunately though, she was not convicted, which is just pure insanity).
I can’t wait for the case where one of the judges asks the defense attorney ‘are you fucking stupid?’!
This guy is clearly a pathological psychopath, which it's absolutely absurd that at no point the judges didn't stop & state this pursuit of logic from this mental patient is requiring a psychological evaluation before continuing. There's clear evidence his body language, facial expressions & verbiage is self-evident to the fact he is completely devoid any sense of a moral compass & human compassion with full intent to be right to protect his psychopath brothers.
US court system is weird and a complicated system to make it as hard as pissible to an average person get justice.
He lost here to the tune of$9.5 Million but a jury of dimwits was able to see video of what happened and find him NOT guilty for participating in this murder. According to the "warning" he could have been killed if he raised his right hand instead of his left hand. I was aware of this murder at the time it occurred and the disgust I felt then has only ground with time. The idea that you can get 12 random citizens who approve of murder on a jury.
As I recall the judge refused to allow the body cam footage into evidence..to inflammatory I guess 😮
No one thinks that something stinks with law enforcement in Arizona, Colorado, and Florida???
Was Langley ever sued personally? Was he ever held accountable?
Lovely arguments by the lawyer. "It is objectively reasonable for a police officer to look at a man who is nearly naked, crawling on the floor, and begging for his life, and not know whether he has a weapon, to consider him a deadly threat, and to terminate him with extreme prejudice." "The police got a call and somebody said so the police have to believe the caller, not their lying eyes."
I'm Canadian, we have our own problems. You sir are a true patriot. ONLY people like you can save your country.
this all leads to the fact that POLICE SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE AT LEAST AS MUCH TRAINING AS A BARBER OR HAIR STYLIST.
COMBS, BRUSHES AND SCISSORS AREN'T NEARLY AS DEADLY AS GUNS BUT THEIR USE REQUIRES MORE TRAINING THAN THE PERSON WITH THE GUN.
I can't believe some of these attorneys go in front of the judges and know the wrong but they'll still try to argue that their right and you're paying them how much money to do that.
I guess I've talked like a fool for free before but I guess if they're paying me that much money I'll talk it all day long
This was Murder......
Definitely don't look at the dust cover on the rifle used, Brailsford's father's involvement and background, or the pension they rehired him just so he could get. Justus System
These first 2 lawyers were like night and day; stammering, circular stuttering with no damn argument and then calm, collected and articulate with an actual argument.
This was incredibly sad and terrible and horrible this case. They just murdered this guy. This poor guy was sobbing humiliated and murdered. That was just yet another one of the most horrible awful deaths to suffer. That's possibly even worse. That's its just yet another one of these cases.
No clearly established law. I hate qualified immunity.
"We got a call".
Lawyer lying his ass off in court
Imagine being that guy who chose that career. He made the choice to go to work as a lawyer for cops… which puts him into the position of having to go to court and do everything in his power to get violent killers with badges off with no consequences. That’s the job he chose. I know… I know someone has to do it. Everyone deserves legal counsel. I’m just saying. Imagine having that job. Imagine how flexible your morals would have to be.
@chancejensen3779 I suppose if he got sick and tired of losing his cases he could always apply to be a cop. He seems to have the right attitude of mind to make an excellent candidate i.e lying through his teeth, not giving a straight answer and as you pointed out - flexible morals.
I can’t believe this cop was acquitted.
These cops executed that innocent man.
Qualified immunity is a scourge.
Right! Like how? The bodycam video is so heartbreaking they knew that young man wasn’t a threat. They gave so many bad directions.
@3:55, "another man in the room with a long rifle", has this lawyer learned something that we commoners don't know? All rifles are long whether they have a long or short barrel.
The lawyer is a pol ice union schill and can only learn to be more pathetic.
That scumbag lawyer is really pissing me of!
can they sue if the shoter was found not guilty?
Yes!
@@fatherinexile great, I remember that trial. I Was shocked over the verdict.
The parents and widow filed civil lawsuites and appears they settled. 1.5 million to the parents and 8 million to his widow and kids. However, you make agreements that either they did no wrongful acts and such. I get the settlement is a common sense of admitting guilt. I'm glad the family got a settlement, bit this officer needs to lose his pension.
Why ATF turned their cameras off.
This doesn't even meet the Graham factors for use of deadly force.
👆this is a commenter who knows what’s up!
A big part of the problem, as I see it, is that police go into every situation believing, knowing, that whatever they do will be supported because of qualified immunity. Why be careful and circumspect if NO MATTER WHAT YOU DO , YOU WILL GET AWAY WITH IT.
idk how that defense lawyer sleeps at night
If the other cop didn't follow orders. Why didn't he arrest him for the murder since he was the senior officer there?
The judges are trying their hardest not to laugh at the atterny the amout of gibberish coming out of his mouth is astounding
Cops Swear an Oath to the Constitution
......BUT........
Very few Cop know or understand the oath they pledge to up hold....
Cop should carry their own liability insurance.
Like many professionals do...
Most cops on these you tube videos can't even get past the first amendment.
If you want to see a real example of this, look up Donald Milazzo ! Jennifer Larson.
Those two cops make law enforcment look like a joke!
This was 1st degree premeditated as evidenced by the commands. Of all the police Vids I have seen, good and bad this is the most outrageous of them all.
It's amazing to me that this is how it has to be. That a cop can claim they had no knowledge shooting an unarmed man crawling on his hands and knees while complying with orders would be unconstitutional. It ridiculous that the people have to meet such absurd standards to see justice because some f*ckwit took 6 months of training and was giving a badge. Is it so much to ask that those given positions of authority have some integrity and be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
Arizona has the worst cops in the country. I know. I live there.
I remember when this happened. The cop that shot the kid, his police issued rifle said "YOU'RE FUCKED" on it. He was fired, then he sued for wrongful termination AND PTSD from killing this kid.
Not only was he not charged for killing someone, he was rewarded in the end.
It seems to me that the Judges hadn’t seen the video?
I know you're busy, but if you could take a look at any cases in contra costa county dealing with police misconduct or sheriffs specifically... well... at least I would appreciate it. 😆
The wealthiest 4 towns in contra costa all have sheriffs as their police "force".
Request noted!
Officers should never assume before shooting someone. They should go by facts and law.
“Integral Participant” if that is accepted as a concept it brings forward something many of us have highlighted in incidents outlined on youtube That of all officers that arrive at a scene and ‘back up’ an officer who is or has acted contrary to policy, contrary to the constitution or in any other manner contrary to law then they are also acting contrary to law. If this is accepted and becomes a precedent then it may allow prosecution of all officers involved in the action/inaction. Including supervisors who might not necessarily be at the scene when the unlawful action occurred but having arrived and been briefed by the incident commander of all relevant facts and actions then fails to correct the situation.
Defense lawyers have no soul
The jury acquitted the cop who killed the hotel guest. I am guessing the jury bought the "he had to make a 1 second life and death" decision" argument. How the jury could miss the fact that the only persons life under threat of death was the hotel guest, boggles the mind.