Kaitlan Collins pushes back on Trump attorney's 'brazen' argument over presidential act

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • CNN’s Kaitlan Collins challenges Will Scharf, one of former president Donald Trump’s attorneys in his immunity case before the Supreme Court, about using hypothetical scenarios in defense of arguing for total presidential immunity. #CNN #News

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2 тис.

  • @tjk3430
    @tjk3430 15 днів тому +105

    I don't think the founding fathers could anticipate the lack of shame future politicians exhibit today.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      yes shame of todays politicians cannot be denied - but the founding father's were no one to judge, lets just name a few examples of their morals
      1- G- WASHINGTON keep the teeth of his slaves around his neckeneckbat his slaves and did not free any slaves in his life
      2- Adams when president made anyone writing anything not true about him or his government illegal, which anyone writing anything the least critical about him was charged as sedition
      3 Jefferson - The Civil war was used by him to make him Richer as he was a smuggler whos illegal smuggling business exploded in size and profit because of the war
      4- John hancock - tax cheat, and all round crook
      you mean those people who's morals and actions were horrid
      LOL

    • @seanswinton6242
      @seanswinton6242 12 днів тому

      Exactly!

    • @craigh2980
      @craigh2980 11 днів тому

      They were acutely aware that activists could use law fare against one another…..that’s why impeachment was a high bar

    • @nikolaipersad4098
      @nikolaipersad4098 11 днів тому

      THIS!!!

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 15 днів тому +111

    --- STOP THE STALL ---

  • @chipbhi
    @chipbhi 15 днів тому +41

    Thank you Ms. Collin’s for confronting this guy and not letting him get away with his crafty, evasive verbiage.

    • @jsusna1972
      @jsusna1972 12 днів тому +2

      Gotta love Kaitlan Collins. When he said something that I thought was total BS, she pops up with the EXACT question I have and slaps him in the face with it.

    • @teresaamanfu7408
      @teresaamanfu7408 8 днів тому

      I hope this “Steven Miller” doesn’t have a wife and children.
      These are the kinds of people that Trump will be surrounded with, if he ever gets back in power 🤮

  • @wonder6789
    @wonder6789 15 днів тому +21

    Great work, Kaitlan Collins - as usual.

  • @LAXPLANESPOTTER
    @LAXPLANESPOTTER 15 днів тому +176

    we just watched a female NEWS ANCHOR slowly remove the BALLS of a male lawyer. she made him look like a fool

    • @Bonjour-World
      @Bonjour-World 15 днів тому +28

      "she made him look like a fool" .... well he did provide a lot assistance in that effort

    • @Gordie1450
      @Gordie1450 15 днів тому +4

      @laxplanespotter unfortunately I don’t agree with you, I felt he more than held his own.

    • @LAXPLANESPOTTER
      @LAXPLANESPOTTER 15 днів тому

      @@Gordie1450 all trump supporters are ignorant,,, you are welcome to remain that way. take care

    • @kimguy4159
      @kimguy4159 15 днів тому +10

      You must have watched a different interview

    • @jeremiahsandstrom
      @jeremiahsandstrom 15 днів тому

      ​@Gordie1450 So do you believe that if President Biden did what former President Biden did or has done, should be immune from prosecution?

  • @PattyASMRPatterns
    @PattyASMRPatterns 15 днів тому +494

    How can he say all of that with a straight face. Please Missouri - don't elect him!!!!!!!!

    • @leonardbresland4288
      @leonardbresland4288 15 днів тому +16

      He's a Richard Cranium, but an evil one.

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 15 днів тому +22

      Chief Justice John Roberts and the United States Supreme Court are seemingly quite confused, unsure and will need to hear arguments and then deliberate over the question of whether the United States of America has a king or a president...

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 15 днів тому

      Donald Trump’s attorney actually stood before the United States Supreme Court, furthering his previous argument..."that President Biden has the absolute right to have Donald Trump assassinated by 'Seal Team Six' under the Article Two, official acts clause of the Office of the Presidency"...

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 15 днів тому +19

      "We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American eagle in order to feather their own nests...

    • @honkyking8705
      @honkyking8705 15 днів тому

      @PattyASMRPatterns wants Biden in power so child trafficking can continue to be up by 1080% since 2020. Patty supports child abduction, child sex trafficking, and pedophilia... Sick...

  • @williamjohnson5161
    @williamjohnson5161 15 днів тому +33

    Stephen Miller halfway through Werewolf transformation 😂😅

  • @richgird7959
    @richgird7959 15 днів тому +32

    He was using official power FOR personal crimes. This guy is the reason people believe lawyers are liars and sleezeballs.

  • @progessXperfection
    @progessXperfection 15 днів тому +386

    I feel like I am living in the Twilight zone. The Republican’s alternate reality creating, gas lighting is at an all time high.

    • @drzaius1121
      @drzaius1121 15 днів тому +1

      "Mexico needs to open up Gaza" - joe biden
      Since when was Gaza I Mexico? Only in an alternate reality.

    • @johnatlascrumpjr648
      @johnatlascrumpjr648 15 днів тому +10

      They're the ones living in a twilight zone!!!!! She can't help but laugh at this🤡!!!

    • @jacc9061
      @jacc9061 15 днів тому +9

      It going to get much worse. Prepare yourself

    • @dench2695
      @dench2695 15 днів тому +19

      They've shown that they have no qualms moving lockstep into fascism. Scary times in America.

    • @borisjohnson5985
      @borisjohnson5985 15 днів тому +6

      I'm starting to think the entire Democratic party and its voters were homeschooled by Elmo.

  • @CalamityJ765
    @CalamityJ765 15 днів тому +174

    Missouri. Go figure🙄. This guy wants to reinterpret the constitution to fit his clients wishes, nothing more.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому +1

      yes if trump wins he will......
      Prosecute political rivals
      try remove rivals from ballets
      oh

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      Really? or is he using legal means to hear all sides and experts to weigh them

    • @CalamityJ765
      @CalamityJ765 15 днів тому +1

      @@voteformethanks5307
      There is no side where a president can break the law and be immune from consequences though. If that were the case there wouldn’t need to be an impeachment clause in the constitution. Trump has said he wants to rewrite the constitution. Here is where he’s starting.

    • @whitehouseplumber
      @whitehouseplumber 14 днів тому +3

      ​@voteformethanks5307 Blah blah blah the Orange indicted guy tried to overthrow the government because his ego couldn't accept he lost, period.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 12 днів тому

      @@whitehouseplumber the orannge indicted guy despite 91 charges is still the Poll leader! which tells you just how biden has performed! ThaT a orange man thatis bad and has 91indictments is the one judged to be a better leader, better policies and more fitter .

  • @saltovar8981
    @saltovar8981 15 днів тому +34

    THAT BOY JUST GOT TAKEN TO SCHOOL BY THE LOVELY AND SMART KAITALN.

    • @Saiputera
      @Saiputera 11 днів тому

      This zionist woman yikes🤢

  • @utube4indigo
    @utube4indigo 15 днів тому +12

    Kaitlan does a great job here asking the tough questions, navigating the legal jargon in a way that is funny and easy to understand. Great job!

  • @lazzar1903
    @lazzar1903 15 днів тому +255

    Credit to Kaitlan for giving it to the Trump Knob.

    • @drzaius1121
      @drzaius1121 15 днів тому +8

      Luckily the supreme court sided with President Trump, making kaitlans temper tantrum irrelevant.

    • @vforwombat9915
      @vforwombat9915 15 днів тому +12

      @@drzaius1121 so, two more words you don't know the meaning of.

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      She is an uninformed tart with an earpiece. Her hubris is appalling.

    • @johnbrattan9341
      @johnbrattan9341 15 днів тому +7

      @@drzaius1121 Huh?

    • @user-py7hk5mo7k
      @user-py7hk5mo7k 15 днів тому

      Kaitlin, the proven liar? The same Kaitlin who talked out of her poop chute? Yeah..... she gave it good.

  • @user-un4zm6mu2o
    @user-un4zm6mu2o 15 днів тому +80

    Great job by Kaitlin keeping the conversation going through the madness of the lawyer's statements.
    My head was spinning every time he opened his mouth.

    • @JOE-6824
      @JOE-6824 15 днів тому

      Seems like you might want to get your head fixed? Both physically and politically....

    • @marcinmerrimack1726
      @marcinmerrimack1726 15 днів тому +4

      Props to Kaitlin for this interview. She’s really picked up her game

    • @yoshiclubcaptainfeerick7750
      @yoshiclubcaptainfeerick7750 15 днів тому +3

      @@JOE-6824rude and unnecessary.

    • @nickpalladino9710
      @nickpalladino9710 9 днів тому

      ​@@JOE-6824so why do you want a criminal, rapist, fraudster who claims to be sent by God 😅😂 as your president.

  • @petethebeatz9574
    @petethebeatz9574 15 днів тому +33

    Is it just me but I'm fedup with these lawyer's trying so hard to find loopholes and being pleased with themselves

    • @Saiputera
      @Saiputera 11 днів тому

      how is joe biden isn't charge with Palestinians genoside crimes?? 🤔🤢

    • @narda1072
      @narda1072 10 днів тому

      You are watching you democracy being thrown in a ditch. Are you going to save it? What are you going to do. ?

    • @Saiputera
      @Saiputera 9 днів тому

      @@narda1072 What kind of democracy that genocide Palestinian?? 🤔

    • @petethebeatz9574
      @petethebeatz9574 9 днів тому +1

      @@Saiputera I feel your pain but you have to recognise the differences,
      1. Palestinians put murdering Hamas in power
      2. Israelis are actively trying to remove their murdering leader.
      3. Hamas get support from Iran
      4. Iran is supporting and supplying Russia.
      5. Palestinians haven’t criticised Hamas.
      6. It was Trump who moved the US Embassy
      7. Biden didn't causes the conflict.
      8. Citizens have to choose their leaders for the good of all humanity and not be blinded by propaganda on both sides or this is what happens.
      With all these simplified basics how and why should Palestinians expect equality?

    • @petethebeatz9574
      @petethebeatz9574 9 днів тому

      @@narda1072 I'm not a US citizen are you

  • @NoirNouveau
    @NoirNouveau 15 днів тому +23

    This man is why many people hate lawyers

  • @samjinping9796
    @samjinping9796 15 днів тому +105

    *These Trump attorneys are out of their minds!!!*

    • @LT-em1vu
      @LT-em1vu 12 днів тому

      Why, you don't like what their saying? It's the law

    • @allenkavanagh6604
      @allenkavanagh6604 12 днів тому

      @@LT-em1vu Then Biden could order trumph killed?

    • @Saiputera
      @Saiputera 11 днів тому

      how is joe biden isn't charge with Palestinians genoside crimes?? 🤔🤢

    • @rathertiredofthemess2841
      @rathertiredofthemess2841 10 днів тому +2

      And they will pay for it!

    • @rathertiredofthemess2841
      @rathertiredofthemess2841 10 днів тому

      @@LT-em1vuno! It isn’t the law! It Trump Law, but it is not the LAW. Your Orangesama is going to prison.

  • @lostmysoul1595
    @lostmysoul1595 15 днів тому +13

    Isn't it crazy how lawyers and government officials are bending backwards to save one man from going to prison for all his criminal activities

  • @Woody54321
    @Woody54321 15 днів тому +9

    You tell him Kaitlin!! You always cut through the bologna to get to the truth. Bravo!!

  • @conorkennedy3304
    @conorkennedy3304 15 днів тому +244

    Is this an AI clone of Stephen Miller talking about Private Acts?

  • @jmuel3424
    @jmuel3424 15 днів тому +132

    This guy is as shameless and craven as Trump.!

    • @june8395
      @june8395 15 днів тому

      Is crooked Biden shameless?

    • @drzaius1121
      @drzaius1121 15 днів тому +4

      If you don't like the constitution you're free to find another country

    • @robertsuch672
      @robertsuch672 15 днів тому +4

      This Lawyer is a dreadful “ Orange ring Kisser” … for sure!

    • @johnbrattan9341
      @johnbrattan9341 15 днів тому +4

      @@drzaius1121 Whats wrong with you.

    • @SydH171
      @SydH171 15 днів тому

      In Trump we Trust 🇺🇸

  • @ayungclas
    @ayungclas 15 днів тому +17

    I could see this guy wearing an SS uniform.

  • @kathleentorres2010
    @kathleentorres2010 15 днів тому +9

    Kaitlan did a great job pushing back here.

  • @J-dizzle2021
    @J-dizzle2021 15 днів тому +100

    It's a mistake to have an attorney on here lying to us right after today, when some of us watched it. This guy is a clown of an attorney. He seems to make a perfect trump AG because he has already shown us how good of a liar he is.

    • @makeracistsafraidagain
      @makeracistsafraidagain 15 днів тому +1

      Seven long hours.

    • @leslieortenzi8875
      @leslieortenzi8875 15 днів тому +9

      Well, he's fluent in lying, but most of us saw through it!

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      yes a mistake to have anyone with a different view on here, because simply if i dont agree with you , you are a liar!!! and letting anyone on who has different opinion is dangerous ! how dare we allow all sides and views on and allow people to decide

    • @leslieortenzi8875
      @leslieortenzi8875 15 днів тому +3

      @@voteformethanks5307 A POV not based on facts is a delusion and doesn't further the conversation.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      @@leslieortenzi8875 how about mention what fact is wrong

  • @Airbrushkid
    @Airbrushkid 15 днів тому +175

    Another Trump lying lawyer.

    • @Chulitatr
      @Chulitatr 15 днів тому

      The GOP appointed SCOTUS justices are a huge threat to the constitution and democracy..

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому +1

      lawyers dont lie they twist

    • @mantis10_surf85
      @mantis10_surf85 15 днів тому

      What did Trumps Lawyers lie about??? Nothing
      Trump 2024 🇺🇸

    • @BassRck50
      @BassRck50 15 днів тому +2

      Talk about "hypothetical" defenses of those charges!

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому +1

      @@BassRck50 if a president believes election its his duty to challenge. He is the highest office. and sworn duty to do so.

  • @dogriffiths
    @dogriffiths 15 днів тому +6

    The devil no longer needs the horns, the hooves, and the cloak. He just needs to run a law firm.

  • @floridagirl4407
    @floridagirl4407 15 днів тому +4

    This is absolutely terrifying!!!

  • @Joey-ee7wp
    @Joey-ee7wp 15 днів тому +176

    She is having too much fun with this clown.

    • @Ohreallybro95
      @Ohreallybro95 15 днів тому

      She sounds like an idiot campaigning for Biden and communism

    • @lilibee3443
      @lilibee3443 15 днів тому +7

      Have you looked up Kaitlan Collins? She isn’t a neutral news anchor by any means.

    • @davemitchell6281
      @davemitchell6281 15 днів тому +4

      you are right for a news station she failed its more like SNL

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      @@davemitchell6281 She lapsed into giggling party girl near the end. CNN is a home for the psychotic.

    • @julesnagbunga1204
      @julesnagbunga1204 15 днів тому +7

      What you mean is that Collins is an experienced and professional journalist whose principles differ from yours!

  • @debracarlson5511
    @debracarlson5511 15 днів тому +7

    Attorney wearing a clown tie, how appropriate!

  • @adamgentry6239
    @adamgentry6239 15 днів тому +17

    Kaitlan Collins is outright laughing at this guy. Treated him the exact level of respect he deserved.

  • @rawuncutmack1038
    @rawuncutmack1038 15 днів тому +20

    Wth!! As soon as ol' boy smiled I got the creeps.

  • @ineedashave1
    @ineedashave1 15 днів тому +92

    He thinks we are stupid with his word salad.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      well if u believed russian collusion and hunters laptop was fake i do yes

    • @bruceleroy7193
      @bruceleroy7193 13 днів тому

      No! He KNOWS trump supporters are stupid he's just trying to troll the rest of us.

    • @mrmack3176
      @mrmack3176 13 днів тому +1

      If you vote Democrat then you arent pahing attention enough

    • @glennshand4665
      @glennshand4665 13 днів тому +3

      Mumbo jumbo.echos of George Orwell 1984?

    • @ineedashave1
      @ineedashave1 13 днів тому

      @mrmack3176 if you vote Trump, you are in a cult.

  • @LS-by6mt
    @LS-by6mt 15 днів тому +5

    3:06 - oh so now you have to read it closely? You mean you haven't done so before the Supreme Court hearing?

  • @mrloanagentman
    @mrloanagentman 15 днів тому +5

    The official “powers” of the president are actually quite limited by our constitution.

  • @markgorhk
    @markgorhk 15 днів тому +69

    Inciting a coup is an official act? What planet are you people living on?

    • @drzaius1121
      @drzaius1121 15 днів тому +6

      Nobody incited a coup. Think before speaking, there's a reason you aren't on the supreme court.

    • @markgorhk
      @markgorhk 15 днів тому +9

      @@drzaius1121 clearly you dont think at all...

    • @dickjones8119
      @dickjones8119 15 днів тому

      still haven't figured out you were misinformed 🤣

    • @vforwombat9915
      @vforwombat9915 15 днів тому

      @@drzaius1121 "Nobody incited a coup."
      true that.
      trump attempted a coup.
      he didn't incite one.
      and then he caused an insurrection, and it's debatable whether he incited it.
      but he gave aid and comfort to that insurrection, which means he is DQed from being president again.

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      @@drzaius1121 Not a biologist either.

  • @stephenanning7849
    @stephenanning7849 15 днів тому +60

    Well done Kaitlan.

  • @billleonard2015
    @billleonard2015 15 днів тому +3

    If I was one of the SC justices asking hypotheticals, I'd ask "if the president fears that the SC might block a bill as unconstitutional, could the president murder a justice as a political opponent and consider it an official duty? "

  • @sethabel4315
    @sethabel4315 15 днів тому +17

    Look how excited he is to be on TV, and how he has no idea what he's stepping into.

  • @robsantana629
    @robsantana629 15 днів тому +32

    This guy sounds like he’s giving the very argument that just got John Eastman disbarred. Unbelievable how anyone could be so dumb to repeat the same failed argument.

    • @gailflanagan1214
      @gailflanagan1214 15 днів тому

      I was thinking the same thing like he must have been talking to Eastman. He argues that the Fake elector thing was legitimate because there were "allegations" of election fraud. So what... They were all thrown out of court, there was no case pending.

    • @GenghisWanghis
      @GenghisWanghis 15 днів тому +1

      Why? It'll be 4+ years before he loses his license, maybe, and even then Eastman is still living a good life he appears to want

    • @ellamarsters8791
      @ellamarsters8791 15 днів тому +1

      Good point.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      lucky however the supreme court decides whats a failed argument and not you

  • @TeaRex208
    @TeaRex208 15 днів тому +64

    If Putin and Stephen Miller had a baby, it would be this guy.

  • @stantonfriedman
    @stantonfriedman 14 днів тому +4

    Nice uppercut on that lawyer Kaitlin . She wasnt fooled by his B.S. whatsoever

  • @tamonicus
    @tamonicus 13 днів тому +4

    I find it rich that Scharf dismisses "hypotheticals" but is more than happy to talk about an election from 148 years ago.

  • @One.--
    @One.-- 15 днів тому +114

    Kaitlan nailed him bingo, & did a better job in questioning this attorney the Supreme court justice great job

  • @disneymama
    @disneymama 15 днів тому +50

    Mother of… how did we get to this point? It’s so incredibly scary to think about where we could be if 45 is ever allowed to set a toe in the White House again.

    • @Chulitatr
      @Chulitatr 15 днів тому

      ////// The SCOTUS decision should be a unanimous NO, a president does NOT have absolute immunity. The GOP appointed SCOTUS justices are an 'imminent' threat to the constitution and democracy.

    • @louisjr1955
      @louisjr1955 12 днів тому

      He is !

    • @louisjr1955
      @louisjr1955 12 днів тому

      Get over it!

    • @sailingthevic3966
      @sailingthevic3966 10 днів тому

      He’s gonna set all ten. Don’t clutch your pearls too hard you could give yourself arthritis

  • @Tini_Scrapitti
    @Tini_Scrapitti 15 днів тому +2

    So a president will receive carte blanche to act illegally, as long as it is considered official acts!? What an utterly ridiculous view!

  • @DPM917
    @DPM917 12 днів тому +3

    “All I need is 11,780 votes”, Mr. Secretary. Clearly private and clearly criminal.

  • @kevinphillips9408
    @kevinphillips9408 15 днів тому +33

    What a clown. Guess that’s why he’s a Trump lawyer 😂😂😂

    • @Rick-de7to
      @Rick-de7to 15 днів тому +1

      Is it an official Act for Biden to Take out Corrupt Lawyers , and Corrupt Supreme Court Officials?

  • @eugene5438
    @eugene5438 15 днів тому +27

    That was fun to watch. She was really good, and now he's going home to cry himself to sleep tonight.

    • @jd190d
      @jd190d 15 днів тому +3

      No, that is the conservative power now. No shame no matter how foolish you look as long as you defended trump.

  • @blaiseutube
    @blaiseutube 15 днів тому +2

    Funny how he professes to know the indictment and then caves when she asks a simple question

  • @Therealtruthsocial
    @Therealtruthsocial 15 днів тому +4

    All of Trump's life he's believed that he can do whatever he wants. Now he wants the supreme court to affirm it!

  • @user-hy6qx2qp1q
    @user-hy6qx2qp1q 15 днів тому +75

    This guy doesn't believe one word of what he is saying. He is a fast talker and he is too young to know anything.

    • @DontbeAsshole
      @DontbeAsshole 15 днів тому

      .... Good observation, I noticed that too, that he doesn't believe the words that are coming out of his mouth...
      ... He's just going through the motions for paycheck and publicity

    • @Jack-yf3ef
      @Jack-yf3ef 15 днів тому +4

      Exactly. He speak# this way, because Donnie is listening and paying his bills

    • @lynnpalmer8133
      @lynnpalmer8133 15 днів тому +1

      Theoretically paying you mean.

    • @Rick-de7to
      @Rick-de7to 15 днів тому +1

      He records the Fine print for Pharmaceuticals.

  • @mstunameow
    @mstunameow 15 днів тому +209

    The only questions regarding immunity for the 1/6 trial are whether Trump has absolute immunity and whether campaign activity is an official act. No and no. Those corrupt mf's better lift the stay and stop effing around.

    • @diansmith7288
      @diansmith7288 15 днів тому +17

      💯💯💯💯💯💯

    • @harryfarber6435
      @harryfarber6435 15 днів тому +10

      He was the president, he wasn’t campaigning on January 6th. Try again

    • @peetah420
      @peetah420 15 днів тому +21

      @@harryfarber6435Was that supposed to be your ‘mic drop’ moment? Yikes… try again 😉

    • @harryfarber6435
      @harryfarber6435 15 днів тому +5

      @peetah420, I don’t need to try anything, but you better prepare your safe space for a good cry when you don’t hear what you want. Chamomile and fresh pillows is a good start

    • @drzaius1121
      @drzaius1121 15 днів тому +6

      January 6th was a peaceful protest, the right to peacefully assemble is protected by the first amendment. No crime committed, end of story.

  • @eldenringer6466
    @eldenringer6466 15 днів тому +4

    The Republican’s alternate reality creating, gas lighting is at an all time high.

  • @TrixiLovesYou
    @TrixiLovesYou 15 днів тому +4

    This is hardly a conversation. Just words going nowhere. Geez.

  • @Pretty_Fly_on_a_White_Guy
    @Pretty_Fly_on_a_White_Guy 15 днів тому +94

    He seems like he’d get along well w another of 45’s lackeys, -Joseph Goebells- Stephen Miller.

  • @meganwagner9295
    @meganwagner9295 15 днів тому +54

    Don’t trust anyone that doesn’t look you in the eye. This guy doesn’t look her at her when he’s talking to Kaitlin. He’s a scummy creep

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      stupid comment! judge someone by the words they say! Those that lie will look you in the eye and swear on kids life too. mosly people you call scummy are just people with mental health issues like anxiety or not used to being on large media channels that are openly against his client. and just consider what you said about not trusting those who dont look you in the eye is the very reason someone who is lying to you WILL look you in the eye LOL

    • @eleashaeatman
      @eleashaeatman 15 днів тому

      I noticed he keeps looking down as well.

  • @MG-nn8dy
    @MG-nn8dy 15 днів тому +3

    complete immunity for anyone is unAmerican

  • @jaaksavat7916
    @jaaksavat7916 15 днів тому +2

    Trumpsollini "stand back, standby and be ready" "it's going to be wild, very wild, fight hard, fight like hell, I'll be with you". That should be enough to have Trumpsollini incarcerated already, awaiting trial.

  • @DavidTa2
    @DavidTa2 15 днів тому +31

    "Id have to look at the indictment more closely" 😂😂😂 Its been scoured through I am sure.

  • @joeystillpoppin1173
    @joeystillpoppin1173 15 днів тому +55

    Ironically running for AG in a red state, this could be considered a favor for a favor or a promise to one another for HELP ?!
    Guys like this shouldn't have a place in government ..
    Smh

    • @jeremiahferguson-sc5rq
      @jeremiahferguson-sc5rq 15 днів тому

      Lmao

    • @SureshMandalapu1
      @SureshMandalapu1 14 днів тому

      Guys like this shouldn't have screen time. I suspected this could happen when Kaitlin in one of her appearances earlier today said something along the lines of "Trump lawyers are sharp today". Journalism these days is just about making money being famous

  • @bgorg1
    @bgorg1 10 днів тому +1

    Scharf is basically saying the indictment should be rewritten in order for this to go to a trial.

  • @chrisper7527
    @chrisper7527 15 днів тому +2

    I’d like to know where did this crazy man get his law degree?🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • @gilbertnau6002
    @gilbertnau6002 15 днів тому +54

    Why didn’t she ask, “why didn’t any other president need this absolute immunity to be an effective president?”

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      They did not need to use the argument before as know one has tried to prosecute a ex president due to presidents have immunity lol
      an example
      Joe biden gave the OK to bomb a car in afghan, yet after we find out the intelligence was rushed and not verified, and the car bombed was aid workers carrying water for aid purposes. now someone could open a case aginst him, but they won't as when he gave the OK he was acting under president immunity
      hope you now understand. simply the reason he is the first is because someone (DEMS) are making the case

    • @AGloriousLife
      @AGloriousLife 15 днів тому +2

      I was thinking this throughout the entire interview...

    • @moetipracticuminstitutempi247
      @moetipracticuminstitutempi247 14 днів тому

      They explain throughout the SCOTUS trial. Trump being an ex-president seems to be targeted by a current president on possible crimes committed. The question raised was that if this is even slightly true, "is it precedence that every president could and should have the same treatment." They further asked about Obama drone strikes and George Bush. While Trump was in office, Obama was never tried. If he was, he too would have requested immunity. Trump runs for office, and now he's tried and requests immunity.

    • @gilbertnau5676
      @gilbertnau5676 14 днів тому +5

      ​@@moetipracticuminstitutempi247he is being targeted, he was under the impression he can whatever he wants and it doesn't work that way. He has follow the law just like everyone else. Q

    • @SPL0869
      @SPL0869 12 днів тому

      @@moetipracticuminstitutempi247sooooo if Obama had attempted to subvert the will of the people to stay in power, you’d have been fine with him using “presidential immunity” as a defense?

  • @Dont.Call.Me.Tall.
    @Dont.Call.Me.Tall. 15 днів тому +203

    It took Trump 4 years to come up with the defense "I can do anything I want".
    This is just insane.

    • @markgorhk
      @markgorhk 15 днів тому

      Slight correction.. he claimed he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and get away with it even before he was president.. and subsequent to becoming president (and I cannot remember which section of the Constitution he claimed gave him this power), he claimed Section 'xyz' gave him the power to do anything he wants... he has spent the last almost 4 years, lying about all the activity he clearly directed to overthrow the 2020 elected govt, but when those lies have not pursued (intelligent) people to his view, he now claims he can do anything he wants.. and, sadly, the Supreme Court, who in recents years have been labelled as partisan, have now dispelled any possibility with their outrageous 'what if' arguments, that they are not..

    • @june8395
      @june8395 15 днів тому

      DEMONRATS do whatever corruption they want and get away with it.

    • @cnnothingburgerletsgobrand6381
      @cnnothingburgerletsgobrand6381 15 днів тому +2

      Oh noo, Kaitlan Collins pushes back. 🤣😂

    • @Dont.Call.Me.Tall.
      @Dont.Call.Me.Tall. 15 днів тому

      @@cnnothingburgerletsgobrand6381 gotta love your schitzo post recently. Really appreciate a good basket case. 🤤

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      You cannot explain yourself, don't even try.

  • @dredre2409
    @dredre2409 15 днів тому

    Great job Kaitlan!! You were well prepared for this interview. These lawyers are unbelievable!

  • @myopinion8761
    @myopinion8761 15 днів тому +1

    Kaitlan sure mopped the floor with this Bozo's arguments. She made him eat a little humble pie. Bravo Kaitlan!

  • @purplespiritzone
    @purplespiritzone 15 днів тому +126

    This Trump lawyer needs a history lesson. There is indeed nothing about immunity in the constitution, and there shouldn't be in the future.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      wow im sure nothing about Abortion rights are in the constitution
      yet how CNN and Dems screamed that the supreme court simply said as much when they rolled back Wade Row as its not covered in the constitution
      LOL

    • @Chulitatr
      @Chulitatr 15 днів тому

      ////// The SCOTUS decision should be a unanimous NO, a president does NOT have absolute immunity. The GOP appointed SCOTUS justices are an 'imminent' threat to the constitution and democracy.

    • @kevincannon2269
      @kevincannon2269 15 днів тому +11

      a history lesson wouldn't do any good. he absolutely knows his position is both ludicrous and lawless, and simply doesn't care.

    • @JOE-6824
      @JOE-6824 15 днів тому +1

      No, I think a good history lesson would be for you to watch the video, an "inconvenient Truth about the Democrat party."

    • @pothos9913
      @pothos9913 15 днів тому

      ⁠@@JOE-6824I have watched it. When democrats began supporting the fighting for the civil rights of all Americans (black & white), All the racists left the democratic party in the 1950's and 60's. They switched parties and started voting republican.
      It's looney propaganda from "Prager U" l. (not a real university btw.) Just an insane right-wing propaganda org.

  • @pathof7494
    @pathof7494 15 днів тому +31

    Second seat before SCOTUS and he’d “have to look more closely at the charges”?? WTH?!? What a loser.

    • @dennishickey7194
      @dennishickey7194 15 днів тому +5

      Same thought. The jury is seated and first witness has testified and he would have to look more closely at the indictment? If true would you want him defending you?

    • @gettingannoyedquick
      @gettingannoyedquick 15 днів тому +2

      @@dennishickey7194 Remember his defense team couldn't even give a good reason how he didn't violate his gag order. The judge went out his way to give them an out and they still messed it up.

    • @dennishickey7194
      @dennishickey7194 15 днів тому +2

      @@gettingannoyedquick He hasn't had "A" team lawyers in a while. Maybe stiffing previous lawyers, compromising them and throwing them under the bus has something to do with that.
      I believe he has the right to representation denied us por folk and he's been shrewd enough to scam his cult for legal fees he's actually paid ( $100 million so far and counting). Not to seem too sympathetic to them but look what they have to work with- no facts on their side, a client that self-incriminates and blows up any defense they can muster all while trying not to destroy their careers.

    • @brockstanford7608
      @brockstanford7608 15 днів тому +2

      Of course he knows what's in the indictment. He's just flat out LYING.

    • @Chulitatr
      @Chulitatr 15 днів тому

      ////// The SCOTUS decision should be a unanimous NO, a president does NOT have absolute immunity. The GOP appointed SCOTUS justices are an 'imminent' threat to the constitution and democracy.

  • @newmove4378
    @newmove4378 15 днів тому +2

    His comments have more twists than a pretzel. Self serving nonsense. The lower courts had it right.

  • @tacobreather
    @tacobreather 15 днів тому +1

    Extreme position!! Absolutely shameful!!

  • @BurgerEater289
    @BurgerEater289 15 днів тому +21

    This guy is the ultimate master of mental gymnastics. Mixed with his honest sounding voice, it almost sounds plausible. But it’s all lies, just a more polished Rudy Giuliani type

    • @MG-nn8dy
      @MG-nn8dy 15 днів тому

      he is running for office of AG too

  • @migluciano
    @migluciano 15 днів тому +19

    God have mercy o this word salad!
    Criminality only applies to the powerless, not to the mighty corrupt?
    What a shame!

  • @josephm7606
    @josephm7606 15 днів тому +1

    “Well Rutherford B. Hayes (a Republican president) got away with “alternate electors” so why can’t Trump expand on that idea?”
    Appalling. Absolutely terrifying arguments. We can’t believe the Supreme Court is even entertaining this insane case.

  • @leomuzzy6554
    @leomuzzy6554 14 днів тому +1

    "Parade of Horribles"??? That was awesome! I love that she's laughing in his face. Maybe a career in comedy after he's drummed out of lawfare . . . ?

  • @merrygangemi
    @merrygangemi 15 днів тому +37

    Why do they keep referencing the 19th Century?? 1876??? Go Kaitlan!!!!

  • @GDTBATH
    @GDTBATH 15 днів тому +41

    This fellow is one of the most articulate attorneys to represent Donnie. That said, he's just another Trump lawyer who is on the wrong side of history.

    • @chrispythegull
      @chrispythegull 15 днів тому

      Yeah, from a technical standpoint that lawyer performed a masterclass. He was so good he almost had me saying ok, give the orange fuckface immunity. Almost.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      if a president really believed the election was won on fraud its the duty to oppose it

    • @mdmurray17
      @mdmurray17 15 днів тому

      It's official if its official...? Give me a break. He is pathetic .

  • @marietaffe6907
    @marietaffe6907 15 днів тому +1

    “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue, and not lose any voters.” Trumps own words. The American justice system will allow him to get away with it.

  • @ruthannwatkins3914
    @ruthannwatkins3914 15 днів тому +29

    Good lord this guy's smile is beyond creepy , his handler should tell him never to do this again , yikes .

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      lol coming from a person who prob seen biden sniff kids hair

  • @BellaSC
    @BellaSC 15 днів тому +1

    Why has no other president in our history needed this? One difference, they weren’t criminals.

  • @michaelburgess6556
    @michaelburgess6556 15 днів тому +1

    Very well done, Kaitlan 👍 👏

  • @pamtuffield9385
    @pamtuffield9385 15 днів тому +32

    When they start quoting things that happened 150 years ago you know they are desperately clutching at straws.

    • @robbieesposito3137
      @robbieesposito3137 15 днів тому +3

      Not just that, but he completely mischaracterized the times that alternate slates of electors were used in the past. In those cases it wasn't a secret, and they were only going to be used if their pending challenges succeeded. In Trump's case, the challenges had already failed, and the electors were either tricked or they were liars.

  • @Trexset0323
    @Trexset0323 15 днів тому +21

    When he says I have to look at the indictment more closely he automatically relinquished and incredibility he thought he had

  • @amywilliams3256
    @amywilliams3256 15 днів тому +1

    Omg what a liar . Thanks Caitlin for pushing back

  • @warrinbang1191
    @warrinbang1191 15 днів тому +1

    No incumbent candidate for President should be able to exert any executive powers when it comes to determining the election results. For this would give them an unfair advantage.

  • @JimiCeleste
    @JimiCeleste 15 днів тому +30

    He is brave going up against Kaitlan. She is the best . . .

    • @user-ed2qk6fv1q
      @user-ed2qk6fv1q 15 днів тому +1

      the man replied well agaist the prepared se;f-showing questions

    • @gasovensforqcult
      @gasovensforqcult 15 днів тому

      No. Kaitlan, just like most MSM talking heads allows way too many lies to be broadcast without challenge. Rewatch this segment and count how many times she let him talk all over her withour a rebuttal challenge to the lies and gaslighting. To be fair, Tapper and others, except maybe Erin, miss opportunities or let lies slide by without challenge too, but maybe becasue the volume of lies can't be addressed in a five minute segment?

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 15 днів тому +4

      "We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American eagle in order to feather their own nests...

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      She is the lady Lemon. Clueless and strident, like a bratty jerk.

    • @voteformethanks5307
      @voteformethanks5307 15 днів тому

      LOL you mean after her town-hall with trump? which even lefties admitted she allowed him to walk over her

  • @steve20118
    @steve20118 15 днів тому +11

    Listening to this lawyer made me throw up in my mouth a little.

  • @user-lz6lq2ke5j
    @user-lz6lq2ke5j 14 днів тому +1

    When he is lying he can't look Kaitlin in the face.

  • @toddchristensenwolf2509
    @toddchristensenwolf2509 14 днів тому +1

    this is why people hate lawyers

  • @RWROW
    @RWROW 15 днів тому +7

    Why does it matter if an act is a presidential or private act? If the intention of any act is criminal, then it should be chargeable.

    • @craigh2980
      @craigh2980 14 днів тому

      Because radical prosecutors can impute intention to criminalise intent to upset the left…and layer up a conspiracy RICo case to up really upset the left…..then create a gag order against retweeting for defending yourself ….. pretty obvious really

  • @ericlaplante1376
    @ericlaplante1376 15 днів тому +13

    Aahh. Isn’t he a Corrupt little butterfly…

  • @haidymendoza28
    @haidymendoza28 15 днів тому +1

    Kaitlan is so cool and smooth, my fave

  • @805drifter
    @805drifter 15 днів тому +2

    Wow, that was a great interview. What is so interesting to me is that Republicans, who claim to be small government, law and order, accountability, are saying the president should have unchecked powers. If the intent for criminal activity can be proven, the president should be held accountable.

    • @craigh2980
      @craigh2980 15 днів тому

      They should be immune from radical political DAs and elderly embittered politician using law fare…. Even the framers could see this coming

  • @Tastylick
    @Tastylick 15 днів тому +258

    Kaitlan did an excellent job pushing back!

    • @ineedashave1
      @ineedashave1 15 днів тому +8

      She should have shamed him. Ask him how he can sleep at night. Tell him he is a psycho. That kind of stuff.

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      Too bad she is an ignoramus with a poor education.

    • @SydH171
      @SydH171 15 днів тому +2

      🤣🤣😂🤣😅🤣

    • @user-py7hk5mo7k
      @user-py7hk5mo7k 15 днів тому

      ​@@ineedashave1do your parents have any children with a fully functional brain?

    • @borisjohnson5985
      @borisjohnson5985 15 днів тому +5

      The entire Democratic party and its supporters were homeschooled by Elmo.

  • @1alb
    @1alb 15 днів тому +20

    This lawyer talks like a robot, sans the intelligence.

    • @1247.cccccc
      @1247.cccccc 15 днів тому

      He is talking to a brainless bot, how else to address a CNN clown?

  • @rcox54321
    @rcox54321 15 днів тому +9

    This guy, like most defense attorneys, is FOS.

  • @marvinsmith2116
    @marvinsmith2116 15 днів тому +1

    Hawaii hadn’t concluded its count so it sent two sets so they would be available on Washington when the count was concluded. One was automatically tossed. These ‘little lies’ throw everything out from this liar.

  • @chaebaker3012
    @chaebaker3012 14 днів тому +2

    What kool-aide are these people drinking

  • @RobertEskew
    @RobertEskew 15 днів тому +25

    Tough interview, Kaitlan. You did a great job.

  • @davidgiles9651
    @davidgiles9651 15 днів тому +20

    Look at the indictments CLOSER ?? THIS is what trumps paying for.

    • @ellamarsters8791
      @ellamarsters8791 15 днів тому

      Considering that he is known to stiff his attorneys, this is what Trump might NOT be paying for, lol. There’s a good chance he’s humiliating himself for what will ultimately be free.

    • @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr
      @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr 14 днів тому

      @@ellamarsters8791AND….was publicly “neutered “ by a FEMALE NEWSCASTER !! He will be summarily fired by tRump when he gets wind of his attorney’s disingenuous comments.

  • @mobreal5527
    @mobreal5527 13 днів тому +1

    🗣Read the script attorney, read the script!🤔