Gyana and Bhakti are the two wings of the same Bird..both the wings are to be flapped to fly to transcend the Maya of the Samsara.❣️Pranam Swamiji 🌸🏵️🌼🙏🏻🕉️
Thank you, Swami Ji, for sharing that enlightened beings can embrace both non-duality and devotion, showing they can coexist. Your words really resonate with me. Please continue to guide us from darkness to light. Thank you once again, Swami Ji! Pronam. 🙏🕉️🕉️🕉️
Pranam Maharaj. Excellent explanation. For devotee like me, issue is not whether to worship or not. Issue is more at root of evolution of Maya. When Brahman is in constant Bliss, why fetch Maya/illusion and become sagun. It is understandable that to make gunas from nirguna, all gunas may have to balance each other so as to reach nirguna state when combined again. But why transform to such variations, does it has a purpose?
Interesting question, I think in Buddhism this is one of the questions Buddha never gave an answer to ("The unanswerable questions"), but I would love to hear what others think of this
@@foreverskeptical1Pranam and thank you Maharaj. Till better answer is available, I presume it is diversity in feelings that attracted supreme soul to change self through Maya. However change from Nirgun to Saguna is next hard problem for rational thinkers.
Swamiji was asked something similar to this and I remember he said something like there is no answer about why maya exists because the question is the same as asking what is the cause of causation, what is the space outside of space, time before and after time. The chain of cause and effect is itself maya, so we as humans can't really answer about why it's happening because all whys and how's are within the bounds of maya itself
Separateness and oneness are more interesting and enlightening when viewed through the lens of will and action. Do I act for myself as a separate ego or do I not act for myself as god as one with the unified field of action.
Gyana and Bhakti are the two wings of the same Bird..both the wings are to be flapped to fly to transcend the Maya of the Samsara.❣️Pranam Swamiji 🌸🏵️🌼🙏🏻🕉️
Great explanation as always.
Thank you, Swami Ji, for sharing that enlightened beings can embrace both non-duality and devotion, showing they can coexist. Your words really resonate with me. Please continue to guide us from darkness to light. Thank you once again, Swami Ji!
Pronam.
🙏🕉️🕉️🕉️
Great explanation Swamiji . Pranaam 🙏🏻
🙏🙏🙏 Pranam Maharaj Jai Shree Ramakrishna
Namasshivaya
Great elaboration. Pranam
rightly explained through the example of hanuman, i too wondered about bhakti of ramana maharshi
To make the illusion bearable😉🥳
Hari om swami ji 🙏🏻
You are born and I'm spark❤
"Your first mistake is thinking you were born" -Ramana Maharshi
🙏🙏🙏
Pranam Maharaj. Excellent explanation. For devotee like me, issue is not whether to worship or not. Issue is more at root of evolution of Maya. When Brahman is in constant Bliss, why fetch Maya/illusion and become sagun. It is understandable that to make gunas from nirguna, all gunas may have to balance each other so as to reach nirguna state when combined again. But why transform to such variations, does it has a purpose?
Interesting question, I think in Buddhism this is one of the questions Buddha never gave an answer to ("The unanswerable questions"), but I would love to hear what others think of this
@@foreverskeptical1Pranam and thank you Maharaj. Till better answer is available, I presume it is diversity in feelings that attracted supreme soul to change self through Maya. However change from Nirgun to Saguna is next hard problem for rational thinkers.
Swamiji was asked something similar to this and I remember he said something like there is no answer about why maya exists because the question is the same as asking what is the cause of causation, what is the space outside of space, time before and after time. The chain of cause and effect is itself maya, so we as humans can't really answer about why it's happening because all whys and how's are within the bounds of maya itself
Hari om swami ji 🙏
Can we have yesterday's talk's recording 🙏
Separateness and oneness are more interesting and enlightening when viewed through the lens of will and action. Do I act for myself as a separate ego or do I not act for myself as god as one with the unified field of action.
How confusing is the human mind? How simple is the human heart? I'll take the simple choice.
Turns out it's only a conundrum if you involve the ego. The fluidity of the spirit does not care about the nature of the form.
🙏🙏🙏