Review: Sigma 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Contemporary Lens

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @Mango62uk
    @Mango62uk 6 місяців тому +1

    Excellent review. No generic, awful music. Straight to the point. Realistic comparisons.Do more!

  • @jbath302
    @jbath302 7 місяців тому +2

    this is how a review should be done

  • @wbdill
    @wbdill 5 років тому +7

    Great review. I have the Sigma 18-250 on my Canon T4i and it pretty much lives on the camera. The convenience of a single lens outweighs the loss of image quality 90% of the time.

  • @thorshammer5166
    @thorshammer5166 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for the comparison and examples shots from the different lenses.

  • @SIG442
    @SIG442 3 роки тому +1

    first 3 minutes was all I needed to know, thank you.

  • @JStieloSoloPhysique1987
    @JStieloSoloPhysique1987 4 роки тому +2

    You helped me alot.. I'm leaning more towards this than ef-m glass

  • @VoteMarkPolk
    @VoteMarkPolk 5 років тому +2

    Thanks as I am making a decision on the Sigma. This helps.

  • @Kouts182
    @Kouts182 4 роки тому +2

    Interesting review. Well done my friend. What do you mean about the cropping con? My English is not so good, so please explain it to me if you want.

  • @followingghost4355
    @followingghost4355 4 роки тому

    Awesome Video. Very Professional, well done!

  • @himanshu-kandpal
    @himanshu-kandpal 5 років тому

    Nicely explained. I'm thinking of Sigma 17-70 mm f2.8/4. What do you think of this lens in comparison to Sigma 17-50 mm f2.8? Which would be better for everyday use? (considering I'm having D5300))

    • @Channel.W
      @Channel.W  5 років тому +1

      It really depends on your typical usage. In my case, it was a tradeoff for convenience: with the 18-300mm lens, I can shoot up close and far away without switching lenses (or carrying two cameras), which is something I had been doing a lot. As for the lenses you referenced, I have not used either of these to have any specific insights, but at just face value the one that stretches to 70mm should offer a tiny bit of extra zoom range, though both are likely best suited still for more wide-angle applications such as landscapes or portraits than, for example, bird watching.

  • @Milicevic1987
    @Milicevic1987 4 роки тому +4

    Hello, how is the sharpness compared to the two kit lenses from nikon?

  • @GalaxyArtMedia
    @GalaxyArtMedia 6 років тому

    Nice video

  • @raybecerra2738
    @raybecerra2738 5 років тому

    ¿Does it works for the Nikon D5500?

    • @Channel.W
      @Channel.W  5 років тому +2

      While I can't comment with 100% certainty, the D5500 has the same F-mount as the D5100, so I see no reason why it would not be entirely compatible with that body.