was my opinion for some time as well, the thing with the snare on the 1s & 3s and the voice off sync... but i guess it keeps the track fresh when you got that little bit of irritation in it
When that second little tight snare comes in...it just ruins it for me. Like it's about to be the most banging track ever...and then he tries to get tricky with it and all the power goes out of it. oh well.
OK the Kickdrums are nice but the vocals are completly offbeat, there is a much better reedit "C-Edits - So in Love with you". btw the original is by Duke also named "So In Love With You" from 1994 , there is a Maxi CD with an Accapelle on it without cheap Traumprinz' effects.
+Vasili Carlson (Tektōn) the original accapelle, has its own rythm wich is not fitting in perfect scale. if the words came a little bit to fast or to slow in relation to the beat it sound strange. So it is in the Traumprinz-version. I don't think it is intended. Sounds more that he doesn't take care.
that's not what dilettantism means, and no, not really. it's just a stylistic choice. why should vocal samples always be snapped to grid and cut and sliced that way? this has a different effect on the music. it's not like intentionally 'bad'. what even is 'bad' and 'good' when it comes to sampling? where's the rulebook?
![[HQ] Sweely (live) for Mixmag x La Relève présentent : Electronic Subculture](/img/n.gif)
guy makes me melt
Traumprinz's as well as Giegling's releases are vinyl only... almost every each worth buying! Even the one on KANN records was vinyl only.
Loosing my mind to this
+FutureSoundStation glad i'm not alone
best house track ever produced?
This is delicious. Thanks for giving me the reason to buy this album.
Bis auf den mäßigen Tonschnitt, dezent geil 👌🏼
totalmente una pieza maestra
Y siempre lo será
mein gott, how does he create these kickdrums?
+EUROPEAN_ICON imagine this on a function one sound system .... uh yeah
difficult process of choosing, bit of layering, bit of equalizing, but compressing, little reverb little this little that and a little magic
@@k4rb0n3 You forgot lots of luck
perfect!
Crazy song. Anyone knows the story behind this photo ?
@Five Star Panda:
unfortunately you're right. and now it can't be unheard... what a shame!
soo brilliant
was my opinion for some time as well, the thing with the snare on the 1s & 3s and the voice off sync... but i guess it keeps the track fresh when you got that little bit of irritation in it
sick vinyl
smooth
holy fuck
thumbs up! but: where is the (much better) b-side? :)
never ever
limited vinyls also?
❤️💥❤️💥❤️💥❤️💥❤️💥❤️💥❤️
isnt it a vinyl only release? i couldnt find any digital releases yet :(
Dukeeee
vibes
Where can I get this picture???
füüüück
Haha, creative sampling : /watch?v=o2S9p0EvCRI
Am I the only one being annoyed by the lyrics 'off' with the tempo , could 've been brilliant like other side
I think the off tempo nature of the vocals is what keeps me coming back to this song! every once in a while everything syncs up and it becomes magical
@@thibaultvanmalderen4216 this. It makes the track
When that second little tight snare comes in...it just ruins it for me. Like it's about to be the most banging track ever...and then he tries to get tricky with it and all the power goes out of it. oh well.
OK the Kickdrums are nice but the vocals are completly offbeat, there is a much better reedit "C-Edits - So in Love with you". btw the original is by Duke also named "So In Love With You" from 1994 , there is a Maxi CD with an Accapelle on it without cheap Traumprinz' effects.
+Dasomen234 Im sure he actually meant the ''offbeat vocal''? Or he doesn't know what offbeat is you reckon?
+Vasili Carlson (Tektōn) the original accapelle, has its own rythm wich is not fitting in perfect scale. if the words came a little bit to fast or to slow in relation to the beat it sound strange. So it is in the Traumprinz-version. I don't think it is intended. Sounds more that he doesn't take care.
+Dasomen234 the vocal sample is not quantised to the drum grid. this occurs in almost all of his songs. it is done on purpose. listen a little harder.
+aaroninky Ok intentional dilettantism.
that's not what dilettantism means, and no, not really. it's just a stylistic choice. why should vocal samples always be snapped to grid and cut and sliced that way? this has a different effect on the music. it's not like intentionally 'bad'. what even is 'bad' and 'good' when it comes to sampling? where's the rulebook?