Watched this a few weeks into the new year and still tell people about it. It honestly doesn't feel like 11 months since I did. Most of it is still pretty clear in my mind. The scenes with Kubrick are outstanding and I had no idea they were so innovative to do.
I hope the final product doesn't have such crisp audio. The kind of sound quality just shown makes it feels like a less authentic portrayal. Visually, it's fine, damn near perfect in looking old, but if it sounds brand new it won't really matter how old it looks because it would feel new, which would kinda destroy the purpose of a movie like this.
He stole it from the renowned French mime, Marcel Marceau. Marceau is said to have stolen it from Winston Churchill, who was quite flashy on the dance floor during the Blitz. The ladies loved his style. Fact! 😉
It is probably not that difficult to land on the moon, because the gravity i 1/6. Landing om Mars and taking off is something different! The movie was fake. It was the back-up, as Kissinger and Rumsfeld admitted later. The kameras on the moon froze and couldn't make movies worth seeing.
@@flemmingdalsgaard3231 Kissinger and Rumsfeld were talking about something entirely different. The mockumentary Dark Side of the Moon used their words out of context to build the false narrative.
Kubrick admitted it in ‘99 deeply troubled that it was staged and he was the only one who could pull it off. The authorities coerced them into it and told Armstrong they could do it by ‘69 but couldn’t
Nope. That was just a man named Tom Mayk doing a weak Kubrick impression in T. Patrick Murray's inept 2015 hoax video. It's conspiracy comedy gold - for the aggressively gullible! 😸
ProfessorBean You know that the movie is drastically different from the book? And this line wasn't in the source. Just google this theory and read it through... there's so much symbolism and hints throughout the movie, it's pretty much undeniable.
This movie is going down as a masterpiece in my book.
Yess! So awesome to see some behind the scenes from this masterpiece!
Watched this a few weeks into the new year and still tell people about it. It honestly doesn't feel like 11 months since I did. Most of it is still pretty clear in my mind. The scenes with Kubrick are outstanding and I had no idea they were so innovative to do.
So happy to see Nirvana the Band stuff in the background
I need to see this film...
This looks very intuitive! Now I want to see it!
And it all looks seamless.
I hope the final product doesn't have such crisp audio. The kind of sound quality just shown makes it feels like a less authentic portrayal. Visually, it's fine, damn near perfect in looking old, but if it sounds brand new it won't really matter how old it looks because it would feel new, which would kinda destroy the purpose of a movie like this.
Yeah I really liked the movie, and that was my only pet peeve.
they really just used clip on lapel mics, so its as realistic as it can be
This could make a great mockumentary
Kyle Campbell I’m very late but, it is one
true and nice video guys..............''one small step for a man and one giant leap for a big lie ''
Incredible
Such a great film.
wow. just wow.
BRAVO!
I watched this move 2X ..I liked it
Hey, this looks pretty good
Amazing!!
Holy fuck I need to SEE this now!!! Kubrick & NASA. In one place FUCK yESSsss.
Michael Jackson invented the moonwalk yet gets no credit.
He stole it from the renowned French mime, Marcel Marceau. Marceau is said to have stolen it from Winston Churchill, who was quite flashy on the dance floor during the Blitz. The ladies loved his style. Fact! 😉
Who gave the gal who narrated the information. It was in July, 1969 not 1967 lol...
buen video broo soy así!! a ver que día vienes a Cancún
dulles shining star
moon landing was 1969
but was it? ...
The film takes place over the course of 2 years
Rych3rInLyf3 and it was fake like obama
Blank Space your dumb
They flaunt the hollywood,world events connection with argo
Brilliant magic trick.
@:40 Voiceover lady says "THE *1967* MOON LANDING". No one in The Creators Project knows 'THE' moon landing was in July of 1969 ??
everyone knows. It's common history knowledge. But people make mistakes, and those mistakes some times go past the editors.
Fue intencional así los conspiradores quedan tachados una vez más de estúpidos e ignorantes todo es con un propósito
Wasn't there a movie about this called Moonwalkers?
In Moonwalkers the CIA is looking for Kubrick but get scammed by two other guys but they end up being the CIAs only option
10 years old...
67..? Lol.. research is a killer !
Moon landing was 1969!!!
The film Starts in 1967 and ends in 1969.
Ha
the failed one was in 1967
based on true events
You think NASA had all that 3d-technology? OK...
@@kristitynvaellus2782 that they lost and now can't go back - ha
I know that there was no moon landing.
¬_¬
It is probably not that difficult to land on the moon, because the gravity i 1/6. Landing om Mars and taking off is something different! The movie was fake. It was the back-up, as Kissinger and Rumsfeld admitted later. The kameras on the moon froze and couldn't make movies worth seeing.
@@flemmingdalsgaard3231
Kissinger and Rumsfeld were talking about something entirely different. The mockumentary Dark Side of the Moon used their words out of context to build the false narrative.
Kubrick admitted it in ‘99 deeply troubled that it was staged and he was the only one who could pull it off. The authorities coerced them into it and told Armstrong they could do it by ‘69 but couldn’t
Are you talking about the interview with T. Patrick Murray?
That had an actor playing Kubrick and was filmed in 2015.
This confession? ua-cam.com/video/9mTWOnl3CWI/v-deo.html
Nope. That was just a man named Tom Mayk doing a weak Kubrick impression in T. Patrick Murray's inept 2015 hoax video. It's conspiracy comedy gold - for the aggressively gullible! 😸
No one had that typical whiny Millennial speech pattern in the 1960's. Can green screen that out!
Kubrick pretty much confessed that he shot A11 Moon landing through "The Shining". A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahaha
You know the shining is a book?
ProfessorBean You know that the movie is drastically different from the book? And this line wasn't in the source. Just google this theory and read it through... there's so much symbolism and hints throughout the movie, it's pretty much undeniable.
OK, JUST, OK. CONSPIRACIES, CONSPIRACIES. Bye.
Nah, I'm not one of those tin foil hat guys. I just love movies.
this voice over is terrible
First point, at 0:40 it's 1969* Moonlanding not 1967. HOW IGNORANT
Nikhil Sharma film started in 1967 ended 1969
milktea. I know, I saw it like yesterday. Besides listen to that portion of the audio and try and explain me if 1967 fits there perfectly.
They aren’t Stanley Kubrick.
Kubrick was absolute genius and a perfect artist.
🍃 🌎 💥. 🌔. 🍃