КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @rhodesmusicofficial
    @rhodesmusicofficial 5 місяців тому +3

    yo!!!! i'm getting into galois theory and these examples are paramount. great stuff, keep uploading!!!

    • @coconutmath4928
      @coconutmath4928 5 місяців тому +1

      Thanks for the support! I have a few Galois theory videos upcoming.

  • @Risu0chan
    @Risu0chan 7 місяців тому +3

    Another subgroup of S5 exists that contains both Z2 and Z5: the dihedral group D5 (order 10).

    • @coconutmath4928
      @coconutmath4928 7 місяців тому +3

      This is a subgroup of S5, but it isn't generated by a 2 cycle and a 5 cycle. See here groupprops.subwiki.org/wiki/Subgroup_structure_of_symmetric_group:S5.
      The issue is that there a lot of subgroups of D5 that are isomorphic to Z2 and not all of them contain a 2-cycle, so knowing we have a transposition limits our options by a lot more.

    • @Risu0chan
      @Risu0chan 7 місяців тому +2

      @@coconutmath4928 aaah indeed, it's a double transposition that generated D5. Thank you for pointing that out.

    • @coconutmath4928
      @coconutmath4928 7 місяців тому +1

      Of course! Subgroups of S_n are tricky.

  • @toddwillsie9612
    @toddwillsie9612 7 місяців тому +3

    5*(2/sqrt(5))^4-4=0?

  • @tim-701cca
    @tim-701cca 26 днів тому

    It is an example of polynomial that is not solvable by radicals

  • @toddwillsie9612
    @toddwillsie9612 7 місяців тому +1

    We still know the shape so not really important.

    • @coconutmath4928
      @coconutmath4928 7 місяців тому +1

      Indeed, it doesn't really affect the argument. But yes, in my head I replaced fourth root of 4/5 with square root of 4/5, which is a bit off, haha.

    • @toddwillsie9612
      @toddwillsie9612 7 місяців тому +1

      Enjoying your videos a lot! Thanks.

    • @coconutmath4928
      @coconutmath4928 7 місяців тому +1

      Sure! I'm glad you like them. If there's any other topics you want covered feel free to suggest something, otherwise I'll be uploading some more Galois theory soon.

  • @tim-701cca
    @tim-701cca 26 днів тому

    I think a way to construct another polynomial not solvable by radicals from the proof.
    f(0)>0, f(1)