This guy has no solutions to anything and no understanding of any of the issues he's talking about. He keeps whining about money in politics, but his example is "We might give a weapons contract to a certain company for Ukraine!!!" Yes, and? The only way to help Ukraine is to send them weapons. Running ads calling Putin ugly isn't going to help; they need weapons. And when we provide them weapons, we have to choose a contractor. We might choose poorly, but that isn't necessarily due to evil smelly corporate influence cheating us out of our money. Every company is going to push their weapons, and at that point it's the people CHOOSING who are to blame if they choose poorly. This isn't an example of the evils of lobbying. This guy just has not made a single good point this entire video.
@@freefallingband NC is literally connected to the Atlantic Ocean. That is as East Coast as you can physically get by definition. How you thought it was Midwest in any way is beyond me XD but yeah South East Coast, aka The South. Parents used to own a small ranch home near Raleigh, we'd take summer vacations down there and live with the bugs and owls and wolves for a few weeks. Not a non-European race person and mountain farms for miles. Seriously beautiful nature state as well & some of the nicest people you'll ever meet on the EC (due to the low education/low pay).
Destiny makes good points regarding the bombs. I agree that Trump didn't drop bombs on other countries. I'll tell you who did drop the biggest bomb I've ever seen though. Destiny. When he told everyone he was in fact a man, it was such a major bomb, because as we all know, Destiny is a woman's name.
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
Mr Beast is insanely fit and he doesnt even do it for the vanity... he would be an absolute stuff if he had a more modern style. But he says he purposely picks a non-trendy haircut and clothes because he wants to look his age lol. What an absolute chad.
Mr Beat seems like he has a lot of knowledge but he really needs to work on his oratory style. He keeps quitting his points mid sentence and jumping to a different point making his train of thought hard to follow. I think Destiny did a decent effort trying to pull him back at times to clarify but I don’t think I’ve gotten a full picture of his thinking. Definitely worth looking up more of his content as I think his video essays may be more structured than his free form style.
Btw - only Ron Paul was the Republican I voted for. Why blame Tucker Carlson? He had people yelling at his family at restaurants in public… he isn’t telling his viewers to be hostile to his political rivals. The democratic politicians are doing that but somehow Tucker is causing it?
When Mr beat started to list the things he cares about,at the beginning of the video,I bust a gut laughing knowing that Destiny will disagree with all of it.😂😂😂
Because destiny doesn’t believe in democracy… he believes that how much you matter as a human being depends on whether or not you live in a city. If you live in a city he views you as worthless.
@@RockPile_ And if you've got a different genetic makeup so you're technically not of the species homo sapiens, then he might think it's okay to murder you, but he's not 100% sure. He'll have to think about that one.
Well, that just depends on how uninformed you are. Trump bombed isis. Not countries to try to push regime change. He eliminated isis so that proves how effective and efficient he was in any military operations.
Lmfao, that doesn't explain all the countries he dropped bombs on where ISIS wasn't operating, Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures that he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
So did every other world leader. Trump also bombed an airport in an ally's country without consulting them first. He also approved nuclear weapons for Iran. He put American troops in Syrian ground, but Syria is still fucked. He moved a US embassy outside of the country to which it was assigned. He was staggeringly incompetent on FP.
The minimum age of 18 for voting is meant to be a proxy for a minimum level of knowledge and maturity-and even if 18 is not a perfect threshold (there is no perfect threshold number) there does need to be some threshold. And I think 18 makes a lot of sense for it as below 18 people generally are not expected to work, are instead guaranteed provision of free education and while they do still have to follow laws are generally not tried as adults if they break them.
Drone strikes increase because they're more efficient, advancing tech, cost effective. I bet fighter jet bombings, ground to surface missiles ground fighting have all decreased.
ground fighting with the US is still all over the world just in small cases, the US army with conventional forces is still fighting Boko Haram in Somalia with bases all over Mogadishu thats our only major ground war as of present day. Special Operations is all over the world in tiny countries with tiny terrorist cells they still fight on the ground, Mali, Indonesia couple others. Which is all the same campaigns we've been in since late to mid 2017-2018. I wouldn't put all my chips on ground fighting decreased or increased when we've been the same countries doing the same ops for the past 5ish years.
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
We haven’t forgotten about that bomb, and if it’s truly people that voted for Trump or agreed with his foreign policy and not people claiming to be Trump supporters and giving their sideways comments then that would be one thing, but actually they should’ve taken Afghanistan and turned it into a glass parking lot, remember Afghanistan where Barack Obama said he was going to start getting troops out but he did nothing but increase the troops, oh that’s right that’s something that’s easily forgotten as well.
Trump totally bombed the living shit out of the Syrian countryside killing over 200 Russian soldiers, who ever said that is probably just posing as a Trump supporter saying that he didn’t drop bombs
I remember when Barack Obama was running for president and so many people speaking about the bombs being dropped by drones under bush and then the drone strikes increased under Obama, for some reason he left that out of his comments
Drone strikes increased but total bombs were reduced, and total casualties dropped dramatically too. Meanwhile Trump dropped more bombs in 2 years than all 8 years of Obama combined.
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
Y'all need to learn to accept your politician getting criticized. It's ridiculous to expect people to bring up the negatives of the guy you dislike when bringing up a negative of the guy you like, just to protect your feelings.
@@diobrando6910 I was saying that when Bush was doing drone strikes everybody on the left were losing their minds and then when Barack Obama took office what did he do, he increased the drone strikes in his side of the aisle all of the sudden fell silent, that’s my point. What that guy was talking about was trumps using drones, that had nothing to do with my comment and all I was doing was pointing out that it isn’t just one side of the aisle that uses these drone strikes.
A lot of Americans do think we should spend less on the military and use it less but at the same time a lot also do want it to fight the bad guys (the ones who did attack us) and/or get outraged when anti-American groups gain power.
US has reduced its military presence in the world. They have a smaller military, closed bases and use less soldiers at the front. Sending arms isn't the same. So government has reacted to public pressure.
Destiny is a bit off on his gerrymandering definition. It's not about the shape (although the name itself is), the shape just TENDS to be a visual indicator of gerrymandering. "Gerrymandering" is the act of dividing up districts in order to increase the likelihood of future electoral victory in SPITE of popular interest. The SHAPE is an incidental byproduct OF gerrymandering. You CAN have a geometrically tidy, gerrymandered district AND a fair district that looks like a hot mess on a map.
He REALLY needs to shape up his knowledge about corruption in politics. It's a huge weak point I've noticed him having for a while now, he has WAY too much good faith in politicians
@@catmanmanson799 He doesn't have faith in politicians, he has faith in the system they are required to work in--he says this time and time again. What specifically do you disagree with in this vid re this topic?
I highly recommend you guys to type Political Geometry on UA-cam. It's a bit long but definitely worth the watch! Moon Duchin's book with the same name has been released recently too.
Destiny’s arguments for why money in politics isn’t really a problem are all really really bad. 1) he is looking at presidential elections where there is a lot of free media attention. This dynamic doesn’t happen in senate house races, and money dominates those elections. Presidential races are a bit of an exception to the money rule. 2) He brings up small dollar donors as proof that money just flows from popularity, yet no one believes small dollar donor money is an issue, the big money is. 3) he claims Bloomberg got crushed once people saw him debate and his money didn’t matter - in house/senate races you are lucky to get 1 single debate, often they just skip it entirely or No one watches it, and people remain ignorant and then vote for a Bloomberg. Destiny is really fumbling here. I hope he rethinks his position.
People on the pro side do tend to also not distinguish between Presidential and House races. Sure free media attention and money tracking to reputation/existing popularity particularly are the case and when there's a big lack of any attention/money/exposure that can be particularly troublesome for a candidate, though you shouldn't really need a lot on real local level, can/should be able to get some positive reputation and buzz at real local level. I think the biggest problem is especially at those more local levels incumbency is pretty great advantage hard to overcome although of course incumbent politicians don't think that's a problem and most righteous reformers in general also don't think that's a problem.
First you thought the title said mr beast, then you looked at the dude and thought I’m pretty sure that’s not mr beast. Then you got extra confused when you realized that destiny was infact a girls name.
STAR voting is too complex. Having people write in a percentage for each candidate is way too much for most elections. Approval or Ranked Choice would both be great, but for the most part, we need multi-member districts
Yeah he’s kind of an awkward guy but he’s super nice and really well educated on history. I hope we see some content like that and he becomes destiny’s history guy
What is it now? If we can't predict voting outcomes, why would gerry mandering matter? He said districts must be compact and have similar populations. But that would harm Democrats, because they live closer together.
@@FqYIwgsiRW2MaTDc It's not that they live closer together. It's that they live in places with huge majorities. Suppose you have a state with four equally-populated districts. One is 90 percent democrats. Three are 45 percent democrats. You wind up with 75 percent of representatives as republicans even though 56.25% of the states population are Democrats.
@@FqYIwgsiRW2MaTDc It's OK, I can explain it. Democrats live within and around cities. So districts in or near a city have much more Democrats than Republicans. Therefore, the number of blue districts can be lower even with overall more Democrats. Let's say we have 560 Democrats and 440 Republicans. Each district has 100 people. A district near or in the city has 80 Democrats and 20 Republicans. A district on the countryside has 40 Democrats and 60 Republicans. So there are 4 blue districts and 6 red districts. This proves that "fair" districts can harm Democrats. The problem is if we district fairly, Republicans will always have disproportionately more power. They don't need to have more districts but they will have more than they should (based on population size). For example, above we have 560 Democrats and 440 Republicans. From 10 districts 6 should be blue and 4 should be red, but it's the opposite.
Economic populism can be popular while, because of, being incoherent, like we should stop unfair competition from taking jobs but should not have tariffs, or we should have tariffs but not have other countries put tariffs on us.
No one should get paid for lobbying. Period. Especially regarding laws that would help a particular industry or not, not deciding which weapons systems to use. You can poll the people to see what amount of money we would want to spend on the system, and then a panel can hear out the weapons makers and use the allocated funds.
800, 900 or more Representatives in the House seems like it would be a much more negative positive change, yes we are a big country with increased population but having that many Representatives feels like it would be a lot harder to have accountability or people even wanting to, trying to have that, just too many to at all be tracked or try to be held accountable. 435 (and the ratio of being a little more than 4 times the size of the Senate) seems a decent good compromise amount.
This is just not true at all. This is such a harmful fucking lie to spread. Drones are way more effective at LOWERING the civilian casualties. This is one of the reasons why Russia which didn't use drones offensively in Syria has more civilian casualties than every other coalition nation COMBINED, as well as including ISIS. Drones are an incredibly powerful tool for reducing the human cost of war.
I mean everyone knows about drone strikes and the innocent people who die in war, but no one seems to really care. it's used as a joke about how evil our military operations are and that's about it.
I don't think there's much public feeling against drone strikes in general, there was against invading and perpetually occupying/fighting in countries, that's very different from some strikes against groups, understandably the latter has much less opposition and much more support, thinking that's appropriate.
after i build my first electric drills and supply coal to the boiler by conveyor belt i always quit factorio. i dont know if it's due to general boredom or feeling overwhelmed by the research tree. i want to like factorio please help me destineeeeee xqcL
I don't think it's that kids are morons I think it's more so they're political views can be heavily based off their parents. Kids often times regurgitate the things they see without critical thinking. Adults do it to but atleast they had time to concrete/loosing their minds. Next we'll see people having bigger families just to win.
walmart employs the most workers on food stamps in America. in 2014 Walmart employees took 18% of the total snap market. Walmart employs millions but what is the point of allowing lobbying from companies that don't provide a living wage to a vast majority of employees? Americans end up paying for Walmart employees food every month while they have record profits
In 2014, Walmart had 2.2 million employees. The average number of people served by SNAP in 2014 was 46.5 million. 18% of 46.5 million is 8,370,000. Your math is wrong
but as it stands now, you have pro-liberal and pro-conservative districts based on local demographics. so if you have distrcits of a similar physical and demographic size, it's not going to be much different from what you have now.
You’ll have a lot more swing districts though, right? Admittedly I’m no expert, but I always felt the biggest issue in gerrymandering isn’t too many red or blue districts but rather the polarization of those districts. Which means no candidate needs to compromise or reach across the aisle to win, they can just play to their bases.
A good reason to have districts is it allows voters of a district to elect more independent, less (or more) ideological representatives, also to reject candidates who are ideologically good matches but disliked by constituents for personal reasons rather than just have parties controlling who actually goes to and stays in the capital.
Districts should be divided by a) history and b) geography. While history is probably difficult after all that gerrymandering (although I know too little about that) I think just dividing areas into somewhat coherent neighborhoods should not be that tricky. The only thing that I think is kind of important is the actual number of people living there. That should be somewhat equal to ban people winning districts that only contain them and their friends. Looking at race, sex gender etc. Can become a problem so making sure that there is roughly an equal number of people living there gives you more fairness in general
Districts makes sense in that the people of a given area actually get represented people on dfw dont fuck with houston and neither fuck with el paso the problem isnt that there districts its likely that there should be subdistricts that pick district reps.
With gerrymandering if you have 26 percent black ppl in an area they should get that same representation. Not split to 20 and six. When that would help one party over another. Democratic or republicans. It’s one thing if it changes orangically.. it’s gerrymandering if you do it from political power.
yeh i dont think letting teens vote is a good idea... if most kids get their ideas from school/peers in school and most schools have a huge left-wing tilt, i could very easily see most kids voting skewing the vote heavily because of their teachers and friends. even when i was a kid, our teachers force-fed us the liberal talking points as unquestioned fact. at the time i was in high school, the big thing was Al Gore flavor gobal warming, which a few years laters was disproven and moved to man-made climate change. EVERY kid cared way too much about it because they were uncritical and totally trusting of the teachers and letting these people who largely dont know who they are yet and easily moldable vote could be extremely bad for the country.
@@billsherman1565 1. Young adults political views change wildly during the younger stages of their lives. 2. Most kids will parrot their parents or their schools 3. The same reason why the age of consent is 18 and not 14. They just arent mature enough to make big decisions like who runs the country. 4. Imagine if teachers would bribe students with better grades based on who won the election. 5. The people most likely to cast troll votes would be teens. Every time there has been online polls on important things like where to host concerts, 4chan and Reddit brigade them to go to the craziest places possible (ie singers going to schools for the deaf to do a concert). 6. Where else would you draw the line before 18 to make life altering decisions? 16? 14? How old is old enough? I hate how old Americas drinking age is because 21 makes no sense. Just make 18 the arbitrary "adult" age imo. Kids shouldnt have too much autonomy over their lives. I know too many small towns where their homeless shelters are full of kids who got kicked out of their homes for smoking meth.
@@degenxayah 1. This can also happen to adults and is not a reason they cant vote. 2. Adults also do this, and is not a reason to prohibit voting. 3. The discrepency is kids as young as 14 are taxed, they can work. And if you pay into the process, it seems beyond obvious to me you should get a say in it. 4. This can happen to adults too, say college for example. 5. Thousands of american adults voted for kanye west in recent election history. 6. 16, because (i believe) thats when everyone can work in every state. Could make an argument for 14 if they work. But thats the key issue for me at least. We're taxing people who have no say in the process, which was a core issue in our national formation. Its hypocritical All of your reasons can also apply to adults, and if you aren't taking measures to restrict those votes as well, then your reasoning is entirely arbitrary. To be logically consistent you would have to also be against adults who parrot their parents, aren't mature, troll vote etc. Since we don't do that, none of these are good reasons.
@@billsherman1565 all im hearing you say is you want to fuck 14-16 year olds because they are just as adult as anyone else so they have the same autonomy and understanding of the world at adults. Who the fuck taxes teens? Im pretty sure they get exemptions as when i was working as a child i wasnt taxed until i was 18. Besides the point, kids have no concept of the value of money anyways. Childish ideas like $15 minimum wage are fucking our economy right now in Canada. You think they would understand that its bad to increase the wage more or you think they are more likely to vote to inflate the dollar value more because bigger numbers satisfy their brains more? If someone is not old enough to live separately from their parent, they arent adult enough to make decisions that have long term impacts, especially outside of themselves. Listening to anyone under the age of 24 rots the shit out of my brain because of how little substance there is, their understanding isnt very well developed, and most of its just regurgitated from elsewhere. I dont want these people making decisions that impact the country i live in. 14 and 16 year old teens are still children and i dont think they can make life altering decisions, even with mentorship. Grooming exists for this exact reason that they are too impressionable to be trusted to consent.
@@billsherman1565 Kids can work and some do, not many and it's generally not expected, OTOH kids do have free and compulsory schooling to 18 so that they as adults can work and otherwise participate in society maturely.
as i understand it, there are congressional and state districts to represent both state and federal issues. So if a person in LA has an issue, they can take the state-baed issue to their Cali rep, and then the federal issue to their Congressperson.
It helps 4 million Amazon and Walmart workers. But that's the thing, isn't it? It usually doesn't. Most of the workers get nothing from favourable treatment to corporations.
I think it would be good if we could somehow vote on the individual issues, instead of a party and then just have to accept the whole party platform wholesale
There can be, often is diversity on issues in primary elections, which candidates are softer and harder on what issues as well as which ones they prioritize so you can have influence with that. And there occasionally are outright referendum on specific issues/policies.
At about 35:00 what kind of criminal reform though, during the blm riots we were being messed with, I live where there were riots and it killed some nice small shops I used to go to and insurance didn't pay out after their buildings were set ablaze and destroyed. I know of 2 businesses this happened to, but some others were ruined as well in my home area. What reform would fix that and have helped them better and quicker. My understanding is police didn't arrest anyone in the case of these buildings and they didn't even try. So what, we vote for more cops? What am I meant to vote for when the elected representatives don't do anything or don't do enough? Would I want more cops or better cops, more training? Even though my home area had violent riots, nobody seems to be wanting to do anything about it, and nobody is talking about it locally, so what can I do, as a household with 2 votes? I don't want loads more new/wet cops, I want better cops. New cops will be shit for a few years and might mess up, but we need new and better cops. So please, what do I do to vote for reform? Blm were demanding the cops to be abolished, and I was around some of the riots, I heard them say it to my face, at the time I was scared so I just agreed with them and went home. But I don't want new useless cops who might mess up. Its very difficult to fix it.
I'm disappointed in Destiny's lack of knowledge about voting systems. Most political people know how proportional representation works, but it seems like he has just heard about it for the first time. Also, Maine and Nebraska are a horrible way to award electors. If the rest of the country did it that way, the presidency would be gerrymanderable and a lock for the Republicans every time.
What about the people who think the electoral college should be done away with, if they had it their way it would be a popularity contest and then we would have maybe five or six states deciding The outcome for the entire country, since Democrats want everything to be fair and equal, how does that coincide with any type of fairness or equity?
It‘s not that hard to do proportional representation. Here is how we do it in Switzerland: each state gets a number of seats, corresponding to its population (as is now). Now when you vote, you don‘t vote for just one person, you vote for how many seats your state has. You put all the people you want onto a list. Then, instead of the people with the most votes getting elected, you count how much votes the people of each party got. So maybe there are 10 people running, 4 are from party A, 3 from party B, two from party C and one person from party D. Lets say the members of party A got cumulatively 20% of the vote. This means party A will get 20% of 10 seats, so 2 seats. Now you simply look who of the A candidates got the most and second most votes, and they are elected. (This is a bit of a oversimplification, there are a couple of additional things you can do, but this is the principle) This ensures that you have proportional representation, no matter how many people run per party. You only have to vote once.
I thought the PR comments from Destiny were a bit weird. It is like he had never heard about it before and didn't know how it worked - which is weird for a political streamer.
@@lukasmiller8531 I guess if you want to fill an entire football stadium full of representatives, it’s hard enough getting anything done in Congress as it is, just add thousands of more people to Congress and see what doesn’t happen
@@girodeitalia2259 I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. Changing form a system where you have one representative per district to one where you have a proportional system where you vote for all of your state reps doesn't change the number of people in congress you end up with? Maybe you misunderstood what I wanted to say in my last comment, I'm not saying they should have 100000000 people in congress, but that the election process is the same in a country of 320000000 people as in a country with 8000000 people
Wait- I'm not wrong that money in politics extends well past campaign finance, right? Can't politicians get financing from special interests at any point? I always thought it was disproportionate contributions outside of elections that influenced politicians actual efforts
I really like Mr Beat and have been watching his content for a year or two. But not long ago he made a video on what is basically fascism, although it was titled differently, and it immediately set of alarm bells. It sounded like SJW stuff implying Trump supporters must be fascist by default. I lost a lot of respect for him that day. Still like him, but sounded like he was in the bubble.
Sounds based and true. Trump supports certainly have highly fascistic tendencies. Jan 6 Tucker Carlson, and any look at any facebook Trumper group is proof enough.
Is it really that hard to believe that Trump supporters have a greater receptiveness to fascism than non Trump supporters? Note the difference between these two arguments: (1) Trump's administration and policies were functionally fascist, and his supporters were fascist. (2) Trump's non-fascist platform and administration appealed to the subset of the population that would be more likely to support fascism if there was an actual fascist party in the country, due to some family resemblances between Trump's non-fascism and actual fascism.
What i dont know, and i never see compared is how many strikes happened, not just drone strikes. I vastly prefer drone strikes to conventional jet bomb strikes.
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
@@computer_janitor yes, to regular fighter bomber strikes, by a mile. the situational awareness of a drone pilot is vastly superior. the reason we see so many bad strikes with drones is that we see at all. an f15 cant loiter and observe in the way a reaper or predator can. if a thousand f15 strikes were replaced by a thousand predator strikes you'd se a drastic reduction in civilian casualties. unfortunately a predator cant carry the payload the f15 can or respond as fast.
@@ravener96 Do you mean that the reason we see so many bad drone strikes is because “we see at all” as in they’re recorded, whereas the pilot ones aren’t? So the public sees them and gets a bad impression? Cus otherwise I was confused because it sounded like you are saying the drone strikes are bad because their situational awareness is better, i.e. it would be better if they weren’t more accurate.
@@matthewedwards8576 its a combination. drone strikes are better because they can be more accurate and be more sure of the target, reducing civilian casualties, AND the majority of conventional strikes arent recorded in the same way so we dont have the videos of bad strikes to compare to.
Yes, there was a struggle with hammering out the particulars of the Brexit in British parliament but main issue was the tug of war between UK and EU on the terms of the Brexit deal (most crucially on the economic and Irish border stuff).
The ultimate struggle was not with the EU at all. UK politicians, almost 100% of them, including the conservatives, knew leaving the EU was going to be a disaster economically. It’s hard to figure out the best way to blow your feet off. And leaving the EU breaks an agreement in their own country that threatened to have Ireland break off from the UK to preserve the agreement. The EU had 1 bargaining position from day 1, which was essentially preserving the written-in-stone rules of the EU. It was entirely on UK internal politics.
@@sathrielsatanson666 The UK had no position. They signed an agreement saying they’d solve the Irish border problem before continuing negotiations and then refused to solve the Irish border problem, saying there was no problem to be solved or that it was trivial to do so. They literally started breaking the law to avoid dealing with it. Like I said. It was purely a problem with the UK pretending that reality doesn’t exist.
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Check out Mr. Beat, not Mr. Beast
ua-cam.com/users/iammrbeatvideos
How can Destiny choose his friends so poorly when awesome dudes like this are within his grasp? haha
This guy has no solutions to anything and no understanding of any of the issues he's talking about. He keeps whining about money in politics, but his example is "We might give a weapons contract to a certain company for Ukraine!!!"
Yes, and? The only way to help Ukraine is to send them weapons. Running ads calling Putin ugly isn't going to help; they need weapons. And when we provide them weapons, we have to choose a contractor. We might choose poorly, but that isn't necessarily due to evil smelly corporate influence cheating us out of our money. Every company is going to push their weapons, and at that point it's the people CHOOSING who are to blame if they choose poorly. This isn't an example of the evils of lobbying. This guy just has not made a single good point this entire video.
Mr. Beat is the evidence of Midwest Nice
Is north Carolina considered the Midwest? I thought it was kinda part of the South
@@freefallingband North Carolina is in the south. Kansas and Nebraska are part of the Midwest.
@@freefallingband NC is literally connected to the Atlantic Ocean. That is as East Coast as you can physically get by definition. How you thought it was Midwest in any way is beyond me XD but yeah South East Coast, aka The South.
Parents used to own a small ranch home near Raleigh, we'd take summer vacations down there and live with the bugs and owls and wolves for a few weeks. Not a non-European race person and mountain farms for miles. Seriously beautiful nature state as well & some of the nicest people you'll ever meet on the EC (due to the low education/low pay).
@@markharrison6498 I don't think Mr. Beat has been involved in any of that crap.
@@markharrison6498 mr beat doesn’t even do crypto the dude does history videos lol
Destiny makes good points regarding the bombs. I agree that Trump didn't drop bombs on other countries. I'll tell you who did drop the biggest bomb I've ever seen though. Destiny. When he told everyone he was in fact a man, it was such a major bomb, because as we all know, Destiny is a woman's name.
This joke is going to drive me insane.
God you're so funny.
Metaphorical bombs
@@diegoseba12 like it’s not even funny dude Lmaoo
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
Mr. Beat is a cool dude and an actual beast in the gym.
Mr Beast is insanely fit and he doesnt even do it for the vanity... he would be an absolute stuff if he had a more modern style. But he says he purposely picks a non-trendy haircut and clothes because he wants to look his age lol. What an absolute chad.
Been waiting for this collab for a while! Mr beat is a super smart guy
dream teacher. based
Mr Beat seems like he has a lot of knowledge but he really needs to work on his oratory style. He keeps quitting his points mid sentence and jumping to a different point making his train of thought hard to follow. I think Destiny did a decent effort trying to pull him back at times to clarify but I don’t think I’ve gotten a full picture of his thinking. Definitely worth looking up more of his content as I think his video essays may be more structured than his free form style.
@Beaver of the Pola well i guess u are the one who is not smart 🤓
Btw - only Ron Paul was the Republican I voted for.
Why blame Tucker Carlson? He had people yelling at his family at restaurants in public… he isn’t telling his viewers to be hostile to his political rivals. The democratic politicians are doing that but somehow Tucker is causing it?
ron paul is papi.
he wouldve been the only time i voted republican.
why cant there be another younger ron paul
I started watching both of these channels around the same time, back in 2017, so it’s really cool to see this collab!
When Mr beat started to list the things he cares about,at the beginning of the video,I bust a gut laughing knowing that Destiny will disagree with all of it.😂😂😂
Because destiny doesn’t believe in democracy… he believes that how much you matter as a human being depends on whether or not you live in a city. If you live in a city he views you as worthless.
@@RockPile_ And if you've got a different genetic makeup so you're technically not of the species homo sapiens, then he might think it's okay to murder you, but he's not 100% sure. He'll have to think about that one.
@@RockPile_that’s a really silly straw man of his arguement, he lives in a very urban city
Sweet! Destiny (girls name) talking with Mr. Beats by Dre. He's one of my favorites. That 'I like Ike' song was a dope track :)
Well, that just depends on how uninformed you are. Trump bombed isis. Not countries to try to push regime change. He eliminated isis so that proves how effective and efficient he was in any military operations.
Lmfao, that doesn't explain all the countries he dropped bombs on where ISIS wasn't operating, Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures that he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
He also surrendered to the Taliban and released thousands of their fighters from our prisons as part of his surrender, he was effective at losing
Bombing ISIS = Bombing another country's territory
LOL
So did every other world leader.
Trump also bombed an airport in an ally's country without consulting them first. He also approved nuclear weapons for Iran. He put American troops in Syrian ground, but Syria is still fucked. He moved a US embassy outside of the country to which it was assigned.
He was staggeringly incompetent on FP.
Destiny is talking to MrBeast Holy Hell? Comedy!
What’s mr beasts Destiny?
I'm so excited to watch this video. I love it when other types of content creators come on to talk to Destiny
I hate how this dude is playing a game while talking
The minimum age of 18 for voting is meant to be a proxy for a minimum level of knowledge and maturity-and even if 18 is not a perfect threshold (there is no perfect threshold number) there does need to be some threshold. And I think 18 makes a lot of sense for it as below 18 people generally are not expected to work, are instead guaranteed provision of free education and while they do still have to follow laws are generally not tried as adults if they break them.
Should be 21
No way Mr Beast said this
I can’t believe destiny (girl name) talked to mrbeast!!! This is one of the collabs ever
Drone strikes increase because they're more efficient, advancing tech, cost effective. I bet fighter jet bombings, ground to surface missiles ground fighting have all decreased.
ground fighting with the US is still all over the world just in small cases, the US army with conventional forces is still fighting Boko Haram in Somalia with bases all over Mogadishu thats our only major ground war as of present day. Special Operations is all over the world in tiny countries with tiny terrorist cells they still fight on the ground, Mali, Indonesia couple others. Which is all the same campaigns we've been in since late to mid 2017-2018. I wouldn't put all my chips on ground fighting decreased or increased when we've been the same countries doing the same ops for the past 5ish years.
more efficient but civilian casualties increased or stayed the same
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
Copium
@@b1bbscraz3y Have they? What's the typical ratio of harmed civilians to harmed militants in ground combat?
How can people forget about the MOAB!?
Easy, Trump supporters in general believe a myth, not a reality.
Trumpers are really selective about when they choose to believe Trump.
Yeah just like when Trumpers supported the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan until they didn't
We haven’t forgotten about that bomb, and if it’s truly people that voted for Trump or agreed with his foreign policy and not people claiming to be Trump supporters and giving their sideways comments then that would be one thing, but actually they should’ve taken Afghanistan and turned it into a glass parking lot, remember Afghanistan where Barack Obama said he was going to start getting troops out but he did nothing but increase the troops, oh that’s right that’s something that’s easily forgotten as well.
Trump totally bombed the living shit out of the Syrian countryside killing over 200 Russian soldiers, who ever said that is probably just posing as a Trump supporter saying that he didn’t drop bombs
“Corey Booker sent me a video” 🤧🤢
I actually thought this was mr beast when i first clicked, absolute throw just like destiny's name
I remember when Barack Obama was running for president and so many people speaking about the bombs being dropped by drones under bush and then the drone strikes increased under Obama, for some reason he left that out of his comments
Drone strikes increased but total bombs were reduced, and total casualties dropped dramatically too.
Meanwhile Trump dropped more bombs in 2 years than all 8 years of Obama combined.
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
Y'all need to learn to accept your politician getting criticized. It's ridiculous to expect people to bring up the negatives of the guy you dislike when bringing up a negative of the guy you like, just to protect your feelings.
34:15
So you were saying...?
@@diobrando6910 I was saying that when Bush was doing drone strikes everybody on the left were losing their minds and then when Barack Obama took office what did he do, he increased the drone strikes in his side of the aisle all of the sudden fell silent, that’s my point. What that guy was talking about was trumps using drones, that had nothing to do with my comment and all I was doing was pointing out that it isn’t just one side of the aisle that uses these drone strikes.
A lot of Americans do think we should spend less on the military and use it less but at the same time a lot also do want it to fight the bad guys (the ones who did attack us) and/or get outraged when anti-American groups gain power.
more like mr based
US has reduced its military presence in the world. They have a smaller military, closed bases and use less soldiers at the front. Sending arms isn't the same.
So government has reacted to public pressure.
Dream collab, i LOVE Mr Beat. Plus hes YOKED
Destiny is a bit off on his gerrymandering definition. It's not about the shape (although the name itself is), the shape just TENDS to be a visual indicator of gerrymandering.
"Gerrymandering" is the act of dividing up districts in order to increase the likelihood of future electoral victory in SPITE of popular interest. The SHAPE is an incidental byproduct OF gerrymandering. You CAN have a geometrically tidy, gerrymandered district AND a fair district that looks like a hot mess on a map.
He REALLY needs to shape up his knowledge about corruption in politics. It's a huge weak point I've noticed him having for a while now, he has WAY too much good faith in politicians
he literally said this.
@@catmanmanson799 He doesn't have faith in politicians, he has faith in the system they are required to work in--he says this time and time again. What specifically do you disagree with in this vid re this topic?
I highly recommend you guys to type Political Geometry on UA-cam. It's a bit long but definitely worth the watch! Moon Duchin's book with the same name has been released recently too.
He dropped a MOAB in Afghanistan first year in office
didn't he also bomb Syria
Think that was on a giant cave and man that was cool
Don't forget hitting the IRGC General Soleimani with a hellfire missile while he was in Baghdad in 2019.
Destiny’s arguments for why money in politics isn’t really a problem are all really really bad.
1) he is looking at presidential elections where there is a lot of free media attention. This dynamic doesn’t happen in senate house races, and money dominates those elections. Presidential races are a bit of an exception to the money rule.
2) He brings up small dollar donors as proof that money just flows from popularity, yet no one believes small dollar donor money is an issue, the big money is.
3) he claims Bloomberg got crushed once people saw him debate and his money didn’t matter - in house/senate races you are lucky to get 1 single debate, often they just skip it entirely or No one watches it, and people remain ignorant and then vote for a Bloomberg.
Destiny is really fumbling here. I hope he rethinks his position.
People on the pro side do tend to also not distinguish between Presidential and House races. Sure free media attention and money tracking to reputation/existing popularity particularly are the case and when there's a big lack of any attention/money/exposure that can be particularly troublesome for a candidate, though you shouldn't really need a lot on real local level, can/should be able to get some positive reputation and buzz at real local level. I think the biggest problem is especially at those more local levels incumbency is pretty great advantage hard to overcome although of course incumbent politicians don't think that's a problem and most righteous reformers in general also don't think that's a problem.
First you thought the title said mr beast, then you looked at the dude and thought I’m pretty sure that’s not mr beast. Then you got extra confused when you realized that destiny was infact a girls name.
I love this guy
relation between gerry mandering and electorates with the concept of fairness in mind. ? the state is winner takes all in terms of electorates
Lmao, Mr. Beat is not neutral or objective. He might be better about it than many other creators theses days but nah.
the American people are to blame for a large portion of our problems.
too many blissful ignorance on a majority of topics.
STAR voting is too complex. Having people write in a percentage for each candidate is way too much for most elections. Approval or Ranked Choice would both be great, but for the most part, we need multi-member districts
Drone strikes aren't nessairly bad.
Your spelling, on the other hand....
@@tcritt ohh snap attacking my Grammer doesn't refute the argument my dude.
@@johnwinthrop2702 No. I agree with you. Just kidding around. Take it easy.
Mr. Beat is really good
The crossover I never suspected to ever see
Very nice conversation. Mr Beat seemed a bit nervous at the start, but it turned out great later
Yeah he’s kind of an awkward guy but he’s super nice and really well educated on history. I hope we see some content like that and he becomes destiny’s history guy
What is it now? If we can't predict voting outcomes, why would gerry mandering matter?
He said districts must be compact and have similar populations. But that would harm Democrats, because they live closer together.
@@FqYIwgsiRW2MaTDc It's not that they live closer together. It's that they live in places with huge majorities. Suppose you have a state with four equally-populated districts. One is 90 percent democrats. Three are 45 percent democrats. You wind up with 75 percent of representatives as republicans even though 56.25% of the states population are Democrats.
@@FqYIwgsiRW2MaTDc It's OK, I can explain it.
Democrats live within and around cities. So districts in or near a city have much more Democrats than Republicans. Therefore, the number of blue districts can be lower even with overall more Democrats.
Let's say we have 560 Democrats and 440 Republicans. Each district has 100 people.
A district near or in the city has 80 Democrats and 20 Republicans. A district on the countryside has 40 Democrats and 60 Republicans.
So there are 4 blue districts and 6 red districts.
This proves that "fair" districts can harm Democrats. The problem is if we district fairly, Republicans will always have disproportionately more power. They don't need to have more districts but they will have more than they should (based on population size).
For example, above we have 560 Democrats and 440 Republicans. From 10 districts 6 should be blue and 4 should be red, but it's the opposite.
this guy sounds like that actor that played the jeffrey dahmer show on netflix
this conversation is a nightmare for populist
Economic populism can be popular while, because of, being incoherent, like we should stop unfair competition from taking jobs but should not have tariffs, or we should have tariffs but not have other countries put tariffs on us.
I had no idea Trump didn't drop bombs, even though I know destiny is a girl's name.
No one should get paid for lobbying. Period. Especially regarding laws that would help a particular industry or not, not deciding which weapons systems to use.
You can poll the people to see what amount of money we would want to spend on the system, and then a panel can hear out the weapons makers and use the allocated funds.
800, 900 or more Representatives in the House seems like it would be a much more negative positive change, yes we are a big country with increased population but having that many Representatives feels like it would be a lot harder to have accountability or people even wanting to, trying to have that, just too many to at all be tracked or try to be held accountable. 435 (and the ratio of being a little more than 4 times the size of the Senate) seems a decent good compromise amount.
That sweet robotic feel when 90% of drone strike casualties are civilians
A bug that doesn't get patched is a feature
This is just not true at all. This is such a harmful fucking lie to spread.
Drones are way more effective at LOWERING the civilian casualties. This is one of the reasons why Russia which didn't use drones offensively in Syria has more civilian casualties than every other coalition nation COMBINED, as well as including ISIS. Drones are an incredibly powerful tool for reducing the human cost of war.
@@codycigar4409 If it was a feature they wouldn't be using drones to begin with. They'd just stick to carpet bombing cities
@@codycigar4409 based and dronepilled
DALIBAN FACTS DESK rates this claim…
FALSE
90% of casualties were *non-targets*, including other combatants who weren’t the explicit target
pre vivance destiny?
THANKS OBAMNA
I mean everyone knows about drone strikes and the innocent people who die in war, but no one seems to really care. it's used as a joke about how evil our military operations are and that's about it.
I don't think there's much public feeling against drone strikes in general, there was against invading and perpetually occupying/fighting in countries, that's very different from some strikes against groups, understandably the latter has much less opposition and much more support, thinking that's appropriate.
New Mr.Beat video idea, I bomb the house of every Senator
Love Matt Beat. Hope he comes on more.
Kinda sad this wasnt uploaded on the OG destiny channel :/ i really liked this talk and almost wouldnt have found it
really weird this isnt on main
Can't believe there was a mr.beat/ destiny convo🔥🔥🔥
after i build my first electric drills and supply coal to the boiler by conveyor belt i always quit factorio. i dont know if it's due to general boredom or feeling overwhelmed by the research tree. i want to like factorio please help me destineeeeee xqcL
Technological war and fear-mongering. Also who tf is Mr. Beat? I'm not in the loop about that.
Destiny making moves talking to mr.beast 😮
I don't think it's that kids are morons I think it's more so they're political views can be heavily based off their parents. Kids often times regurgitate the things they see without critical thinking. Adults do it to but atleast they had time to concrete/loosing their minds. Next we'll see people having bigger families just to win.
he sounds exactly like jeffery dahmer from the new dahmer netflix show
walmart employs the most workers on food stamps in America. in 2014 Walmart employees took 18% of the total snap market. Walmart employs millions but what is the point of allowing lobbying from companies that don't provide a living wage to a vast majority of employees? Americans end up paying for Walmart employees food every month while they have record profits
In 2014, Walmart had 2.2 million employees.
The average number of people served by SNAP in 2014 was 46.5 million.
18% of 46.5 million is 8,370,000.
Your math is wrong
but as it stands now, you have pro-liberal and pro-conservative districts based on local demographics. so if you have distrcits of a similar physical and demographic size, it's not going to be much different from what you have now.
You’ll have a lot more swing districts though, right? Admittedly I’m no expert, but I always felt the biggest issue in gerrymandering isn’t too many red or blue districts but rather the polarization of those districts. Which means no candidate needs to compromise or reach across the aisle to win, they can just play to their bases.
A good reason to have districts is it allows voters of a district to elect more independent, less (or more) ideological representatives, also to reject candidates who are ideologically good matches but disliked by constituents for personal reasons rather than just have parties controlling who actually goes to and stays in the capital.
Districts should be divided by a) history and b) geography. While history is probably difficult after all that gerrymandering (although I know too little about that) I think just dividing areas into somewhat coherent neighborhoods should not be that tricky. The only thing that I think is kind of important is the actual number of people living there. That should be somewhat equal to ban people winning districts that only contain them and their friends. Looking at race, sex gender etc. Can become a problem so making sure that there is roughly an equal number of people living there gives you more fairness in general
Destiny... You don't understand the point of districting...? Jeez.
Like... Really?
Districts makes sense in that the people of a given area actually get represented people on dfw dont fuck with houston and neither fuck with el paso the problem isnt that there districts its likely that there should be subdistricts that pick district reps.
not mr beast?
With gerrymandering if you have 26 percent black ppl in an area they should get that same representation. Not split to 20 and six. When that would help one party over another. Democratic or republicans. It’s one thing if it changes orangically.. it’s gerrymandering if you do it from political power.
This is why multi member districts are good
yeh i dont think letting teens vote is a good idea... if most kids get their ideas from school/peers in school and most schools have a huge left-wing tilt, i could very easily see most kids voting skewing the vote heavily because of their teachers and friends.
even when i was a kid, our teachers force-fed us the liberal talking points as unquestioned fact. at the time i was in high school, the big thing was Al Gore flavor gobal warming, which a few years laters was disproven and moved to man-made climate change. EVERY kid cared way too much about it because they were uncritical and totally trusting of the teachers and letting these people who largely dont know who they are yet and easily moldable vote could be extremely bad for the country.
People/adults already do this.... that's the point. What is the functional difference between a child being force fed propaganda vs an adult?
@@billsherman1565 1. Young adults political views change wildly during the younger stages of their lives.
2. Most kids will parrot their parents or their schools
3. The same reason why the age of consent is 18 and not 14. They just arent mature enough to make big decisions like who runs the country.
4. Imagine if teachers would bribe students with better grades based on who won the election.
5. The people most likely to cast troll votes would be teens. Every time there has been online polls on important things like where to host concerts, 4chan and Reddit brigade them to go to the craziest places possible (ie singers going to schools for the deaf to do a concert).
6. Where else would you draw the line before 18 to make life altering decisions? 16? 14? How old is old enough? I hate how old Americas drinking age is because 21 makes no sense. Just make 18 the arbitrary "adult" age imo. Kids shouldnt have too much autonomy over their lives. I know too many small towns where their homeless shelters are full of kids who got kicked out of their homes for smoking meth.
@@degenxayah 1. This can also happen to adults and is not a reason they cant vote.
2. Adults also do this, and is not a reason to prohibit voting.
3. The discrepency is kids as young as 14 are taxed, they can work. And if you pay into the process, it seems beyond obvious to me you should get a say in it.
4. This can happen to adults too, say college for example.
5. Thousands of american adults voted for kanye west in recent election history.
6. 16, because (i believe) thats when everyone can work in every state. Could make an argument for 14 if they work. But thats the key issue for me at least. We're taxing people who have no say in the process, which was a core issue in our national formation. Its hypocritical
All of your reasons can also apply to adults, and if you aren't taking measures to restrict those votes as well, then your reasoning is entirely arbitrary. To be logically consistent you would have to also be against adults who parrot their parents, aren't mature, troll vote etc. Since we don't do that, none of these are good reasons.
@@billsherman1565 all im hearing you say is you want to fuck 14-16 year olds because they are just as adult as anyone else so they have the same autonomy and understanding of the world at adults.
Who the fuck taxes teens? Im pretty sure they get exemptions as when i was working as a child i wasnt taxed until i was 18. Besides the point, kids have no concept of the value of money anyways. Childish ideas like $15 minimum wage are fucking our economy right now in Canada. You think they would understand that its bad to increase the wage more or you think they are more likely to vote to inflate the dollar value more because bigger numbers satisfy their brains more?
If someone is not old enough to live separately from their parent, they arent adult enough to make decisions that have long term impacts, especially outside of themselves.
Listening to anyone under the age of 24 rots the shit out of my brain because of how little substance there is, their understanding isnt very well developed, and most of its just regurgitated from elsewhere. I dont want these people making decisions that impact the country i live in.
14 and 16 year old teens are still children and i dont think they can make life altering decisions, even with mentorship. Grooming exists for this exact reason that they are too impressionable to be trusted to consent.
@@billsherman1565 Kids can work and some do, not many and it's generally not expected, OTOH kids do have free and compulsory schooling to 18 so that they as adults can work and otherwise participate in society maturely.
as i understand it, there are congressional and state districts to represent both state and federal issues. So if a person in LA has an issue, they can take the state-baed issue to their Cali rep, and then the federal issue to their Congressperson.
It helps 4 million Amazon and Walmart workers. But that's the thing, isn't it? It usually doesn't. Most of the workers get nothing from favourable treatment to corporations.
How about a job?
I think it would be good if we could somehow vote on the individual issues, instead of a party and then just have to accept the whole party platform wholesale
There can be, often is diversity on issues in primary elections, which candidates are softer and harder on what issues as well as which ones they prioritize so you can have influence with that. And there occasionally are outright referendum on specific issues/policies.
At about 35:00 what kind of criminal reform though, during the blm riots we were being messed with, I live where there were riots and it killed some nice small shops I used to go to and insurance didn't pay out after their buildings were set ablaze and destroyed.
I know of 2 businesses this happened to, but some others were ruined as well in my home area.
What reform would fix that and have helped them better and quicker. My understanding is police didn't arrest anyone in the case of these buildings and they didn't even try.
So what, we vote for more cops? What am I meant to vote for when the elected representatives don't do anything or don't do enough?
Would I want more cops or better cops, more training? Even though my home area had violent riots, nobody seems to be wanting to do anything about it, and nobody is talking about it locally, so what can I do, as a household with 2 votes? I don't want loads more new/wet cops, I want better cops. New cops will be shit for a few years and might mess up, but we need new and better cops.
So please, what do I do to vote for reform? Blm were demanding the cops to be abolished, and I was around some of the riots, I heard them say it to my face, at the time I was scared so I just agreed with them and went home.
But I don't want new useless cops who might mess up.
Its very difficult to fix it.
M.O.A.B...
MOAB tho..
I'm disappointed in Destiny's lack of knowledge about voting systems. Most political people know how proportional representation works, but it seems like he has just heard about it for the first time. Also, Maine and Nebraska are a horrible way to award electors. If the rest of the country did it that way, the presidency would be gerrymanderable and a lock for the Republicans every time.
What about the people who think the electoral college should be done away with, if they had it their way it would be a popularity contest and then we would have maybe five or six states deciding The outcome for the entire country, since Democrats want everything to be fair and equal, how does that coincide with any type of fairness or equity?
I thought it said Mr. Beast. Disappointed.
When is Mr. Beat doing the next tree giveaway
I love these 2 as debate figures, it’s so logical and beautiful 🥲
Holy shit when I started seeing this pop up in chat I was so hype
It‘s not that hard to do proportional representation. Here is how we do it in Switzerland: each state gets a number of seats, corresponding to its population (as is now). Now when you vote, you don‘t vote for just one person, you vote for how many seats your state has. You put all the people you want onto a list. Then, instead of the people with the most votes getting elected, you count how much votes the people of each party got. So maybe there are 10 people running, 4 are from party A, 3 from party B, two from party C and one person from party D. Lets say the members of party A got cumulatively 20% of the vote. This means party A will get 20% of 10 seats, so 2 seats. Now you simply look who of the A candidates got the most and second most votes, and they are elected.
(This is a bit of a oversimplification, there are a couple of additional things you can do, but this is the principle)
This ensures that you have proportional representation, no matter how many people run per party. You only have to vote once.
I thought the PR comments from Destiny were a bit weird. It is like he had never heard about it before and didn't know how it worked - which is weird for a political streamer.
That’s easier said than done, especially when you live in a country that has approximately 9 million people in it, wouldn’t you say?
@@girodeitalia2259 No I wouldn't say, the math behind the voting process is the exact same, no matter if 10 people are voting or 100000000, right?
@@lukasmiller8531 I guess if you want to fill an entire football stadium full of representatives, it’s hard enough getting anything done in Congress as it is, just add thousands of more people to Congress and see what doesn’t happen
@@girodeitalia2259 I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. Changing form a system where you have one representative per district to one where you have a proportional system where you vote for all of your state reps doesn't change the number of people in congress you end up with? Maybe you misunderstood what I wanted to say in my last comment, I'm not saying they should have 100000000 people in congress, but that the election process is the same in a country of 320000000 people as in a country with 8000000 people
8:30 I know a lot ppl who only drink 1 soda.
Man deals in half thoughts.
I really thought destiny was going to talk to mr.beast…
Wait- I'm not wrong that money in politics extends well past campaign finance, right? Can't politicians get financing from special interests at any point? I always thought it was disproportionate contributions outside of elections that influenced politicians actual efforts
Jordan Peterson debate when
Just here for the gameplay.
didnt see this coming.
Good stuff. More Mr. beat!
I really like Mr Beat and have been watching his content for a year or two. But not long ago he made a video on what is basically fascism, although it was titled differently, and it immediately set of alarm bells. It sounded like SJW stuff implying Trump supporters must be fascist by default. I lost a lot of respect for him that day. Still like him, but sounded like he was in the bubble.
Sounds based and true. Trump supports certainly have highly fascistic tendencies. Jan 6 Tucker Carlson, and any look at any facebook Trumper group is proof enough.
People who still support trump are either facists or have just been duped
Trump was a fascist so supporting him means that one supports fascism
Is it really that hard to believe that Trump supporters have a greater receptiveness to fascism than non Trump supporters? Note the difference between these two arguments: (1) Trump's administration and policies were functionally fascist, and his supporters were fascist. (2) Trump's non-fascist platform and administration appealed to the subset of the population that would be more likely to support fascism if there was an actual fascist party in the country, due to some family resemblances between Trump's non-fascism and actual fascism.
Weird I see 5 comments and can't read any.
Mr beat is the best
What a collab with Mr. Beat! He doesn't live that far from me. I hope this is as good as I want it to be
What i dont know, and i never see compared is how many strikes happened, not just drone strikes. I vastly prefer drone strikes to conventional jet bomb strikes.
Trump dropped more bombs than Bush and Obama combined based on the figures he released, and we have no clue how many he dropped in his final year cause he classified that
@@computer_janitor yes, to regular fighter bomber strikes, by a mile. the situational awareness of a drone pilot is vastly superior. the reason we see so many bad strikes with drones is that we see at all. an f15 cant loiter and observe in the way a reaper or predator can. if a thousand f15 strikes were replaced by a thousand predator strikes you'd se a drastic reduction in civilian casualties. unfortunately a predator cant carry the payload the f15 can or respond as fast.
@@ravener96
Do you mean that the reason we see so many bad drone strikes is because “we see at all” as in they’re recorded, whereas the pilot ones aren’t? So the public sees them and gets a bad impression? Cus otherwise I was confused because it sounded like you are saying the drone strikes are bad because their situational awareness is better, i.e. it would be better if they weren’t more accurate.
@@matthewedwards8576 its a combination. drone strikes are better because they can be more accurate and be more sure of the target, reducing civilian casualties, AND the majority of conventional strikes arent recorded in the same way so we dont have the videos of bad strikes to compare to.
1:05:15 why would that even matter?
Mr.Beat cool.
Lol matt beats what
Yes, there was a struggle with hammering out the particulars of the Brexit in British parliament but main issue was the tug of war between UK and EU on the terms of the Brexit deal (most crucially on the economic and Irish border stuff).
The ultimate struggle was not with the EU at all. UK politicians, almost 100% of them, including the conservatives, knew leaving the EU was going to be a disaster economically. It’s hard to figure out the best way to blow your feet off.
And leaving the EU breaks an agreement in their own country that threatened to have Ireland break off from the UK to preserve the agreement.
The EU had 1 bargaining position from day 1, which was essentially preserving the written-in-stone rules of the EU. It was entirely on UK internal politics.
@@TheIncognitusMe and UK had one position. That's the core of the disagreement. Been there, seen that 😉
@@sathrielsatanson666 The UK had no position. They signed an agreement saying they’d solve the Irish border problem before continuing negotiations and then refused to solve the Irish border problem, saying there was no problem to be solved or that it was trivial to do so. They literally started breaking the law to avoid dealing with it.
Like I said. It was purely a problem with the UK pretending that reality doesn’t exist.
The UK had no position? You get a cookie for the stupidity of the day. Enjoy it.
If destiny had a major he’d be poli sci 😂
Well it would probably be music
Politics and science go together as well as you think and that major is about as credible as sociology
Mr bean