Israel, UAE, and Bahrain debate the Abraham Accords | Oxford Union
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ► is.gd/OxfordUnion
Oxford Union on Facebook: / theoxfordunion
Oxford Union on Twitter: @OxfordUnion
Website: www.oxford-unio...
The Ambassadors to The United Kingdom of The UAE, Israel, and the Deputy Head of Mission from Bahrain discuss the Abraham Accords and the future of the Middle East. The Ambassadors reflected on deepening the implementation of the Abraham Accords and the UK's role in regional peace and prosperity.
ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY: The Oxford Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. Since 1823, the Union has been promoting debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.
This dialogue seems to paint a picture of joy and harmony.
The greatest enemy is from within
Just in the last few days there has been horrendous atrocities and a pogrom by right wing settlers against the Palestinians
It’s bizarre that Netanyahu is praised whereas the reality is that he has convened a total right wing government that would disagree with everything that has been said here in this dialogue
The Arab countries should have entered these accords with an expression of more leverage to ensure that the rights and freedom of the Palestinians is genuinely forged. At this stage it’s only about their financial and geo political gains.
The Great honourable and sincere Nelson Mandela in his fight against apartheid in South Africa said “ We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians “
Thank you to the president of the Union who was highlighting the very true nature of the real situation with his fair and balanced questions
You sound like a brainwashed South African under the age of 40 lol. How's ANC/EFF treating you lately? 😂
@@obsidiansiriusblackheart
You sound like the typical , uneducated low income racist who hides behind the colour of your skin and believe you have the right to to strip others of their dignity
I’m not South African.
They have issues you right but there people enjoy freedoms and rights like no other. Even the past oppressor has been awarded rights and freedoms
You clearly don't know anything about the conflict! If Israel has a small percentage of right wing extremists then probably 90% of Palestinians are right wing extremists. So you have to hold Palestinians accountable first, and stop consuming Aljazeera propaganda!
@@KGF-zf2qj
You’ve said nothing of substance in your comment. I remind you this is a platform for intelligent debate .
@@selloc7433
My point is that these Arab countries were attacked by Iran, the UAE was attacked with rockets by The Houthis and Bahrain Shia population revolted against the government in the Arab spring with Iran assistance. So saying the Arabs should push for the rights of Palestinians who are committing ter*or attacks and clearly don’t want peace is laughable because these countries want to look for their safety first then care about the safety of people who want to be martyrs.
I didn’t find any debate between any of them, this is just like an interview. Make me correct if I am wrong
Because its propaganda.
It's amazing how a viewpoint on one issue can change how the whole world looks to you...
Nobody challenged the Israeli ambassador.. she’s a piece of work kicking Palestinians out of homes and moving settlers in..that was her job!
Did she really say Gaza would become the Middle East Singapore, while under blockade???? Glad he called her out on that
Singapore was built upon multiculturalism, multi-faiths and strong core values of mutual respect. We did not build our country by imposing blockades, looting stolen lands, murdering young boys with gunfire from Israeli warships while they were playing football on the beach, etc (The Bakr Brothers, may God have mercy on their souls). Palestinian have rights to resist. I can't believe she would even compare my country to their murdering apartheid regime. Vile woman.
it would... if arabs would f off....... otherwise no......israel leaves them alone ..they will kill eachother....let's not play games.
@@farda8473 😂🤣😂😂😂😂
Billions of Qatari money! all is gone on weapons and digging tunnels!
I can hear protests in the background.
There was surely a tension there.
GOOD! I hope citizens wake up and revolt. This is a flagrant, blatant support for white colonialism. Fuck that.
As there should be!
Which part of the video can u hear the protests ?
Honestly the president set a fairly harsh tone if you ask me
@@ashii6040 around 5:10 and onward you can hear people shouting
So intimidating having the two bodyguards sat on the front row glowering at the audience the whole time lol
The Oxford Union is such a great place for an open and civil discussion, I hope it continues
no it isn't....there is no such platform anywhere
@@farda8473 I may agree with you. But what do YOU mean?
@@erhardtharris8727 I mean there are no platforms where actual honest discussions take place....oxford is specially not such a platform.
This discussion here was the worst i have even seen.......bahrain talks as if they are very humane country and nobody says anything? This is insane!!! While people talk about what israel does.....we are talking abou UAE where you go to jail as a tourist if you kiss your wife.........WTF??!! Not even one question. Sure israeli's are a...holes....but compared to bahraini's and emirati's they are angels..... i'm from middle east btw.......i would wish my country would be ruled like israel lol
@@farda8473 Right.
One thing at a time. First, to demonstrate that peace with a modern democratic republic (or whatever the State of Israel is) is possible and can be a permanent good. And Second, that those countries that want to extend some or many of Israel's internal policies into their own states, adopting the better portions, may do so - and it isn't the end of the world (the exact opposite!).
Where is the speech of King Reza Pahlavi of Persia?
almost wanted to answer you.....but realized, i don't know a king called that....i thought you were talking about r pahlavi( once crown price in the 70's) lol
Let’s assume the Palestinian/Israeli or Israeli/Palestinian situation is worse than deadlocked, it certainly has felt that way in my lifetime, so the question I have is: do these accords and the resultant business and cultural exchange do anything to improve the chances that people in the region will feel any differently about each other? From the talk, it feels as if the accords are about money and business connections, which perhaps is a way to break a deadlock, but unless this also leads to shifting mindsets among the average people what’s the point? It’s unfortunate that none of the questioners asked the critical question of ‘how will this make things better?’ I assume/hope the accords will improve the situation, but they could also be a massive distraction from addressing very deep problems. Criticism aside, I’m encouraged to see someone doing something, and I also respect those who speak up and ask if the Palestinians are not being forgotten.
On point. Literally waited the entire time for someone to make that point.
they may help but u cannot solve a problem until the underlying cause is resolved.
the analogy would be this, u and your neighbour are having a dispute over a border. his trees are encroaching onto your drive damaging your car as u park. he comes around with a cake to give u (the accords) that's great short term u say think makes it more civil for a few days maybe a week..... ur still annoyed he needs to cut his trees back to his own border
the land and home stealing of the Palestinian must stop. the 1969 border is clear and had already been agreed upon once by the UN. Once the offending state pulls its settlement back to the correct borderline (or the agreed alternative by the UN decades ago) then bridge building between the two sides can work long term and be effect. but until Palestine get their recognised border and state uphold, there will always be an underlying and justifiable resentment that can not be simply brushed over by gestures. that's before u even additionally talk about illegal blockades and war crimes... just taking about the base underlying issue
Joint accords without Palestine, what a joke
You mean the terrorist state that has rejected EVERY SINGLE peace treaty and offer of land that has been put to the table, you mean THAT palestine?
@@VincenzoInfi LIAR. Read the Palestine Papers.
She kept a straight face when describing her country as a democracy. Amazing. Your in Oxford lady pick up a dictionary Oxford is famous for them.
It is a democracy, that's why the Arab population needs to stay at 20%, they're well aware that Israel can't exist without a jewish majority to vote.
What makes you think Israel isn't a democracy?
israel is 1000x more democratic and free than the other countries.......imagine a jew suing the emirati government hahahahahaha....no don't imagine, it is messy lol
Btw democracy is a system ......it isn't the outcome.
Israelis can have more of a straight face when saying their country is a democracy than usa.........2 party system and in reality corrupt as FFFF
Compared to ( our) muslim countries.... israel is great. I would be more free in israel than any other muslim county in the world...no exception....any muslim country
@@farda8473 😂😂😂
@@kronosDking The NationState can’t be both a Jewish state, and a democracy.
@OxfordUnion could you please upload Reza Pahlavi's appearance at Oxford Union. I have been waiting for over a week, with no upload on any form on online media.
Cheers
Shame on the Oxford uniom
I’m from the Iceni tribe and we want our historical homeland back, the area that’s wrongfully known as “Norfolk” today. We haven’t being there for 2000 years, but we need it back. Our state has a right to exist
Are the iceni tribe denied the right to live in Norfolk
If only the human shield wielders knew that people genuinely champion thier cause...
@@anirudhk217 we need our own state, we need to be the majority so a lot of the east Anglicans have to be moved and we have make our own settlements in their stead
Did the Jews take your homeland too?
@@voltairedentotalenkrieg5147 don't talk stupid....this is not the historical fact...i'm not gonna waist too much time on this.....simply arabs in that place were called "palestinians" for the first time in 1921 ( by an arab journalist)... For one we are not talking about a tribe or a people as such... besides they were not displaced.... they started a war of greed and they lost
Now there should be no compromise or adjustments between any parties; only one decision should be made to whom it belongs; they will be the sole owners, and the outsiders should kick out of the place without any mercy or hesitation between the periods of years. learned lots of horrible lessons and lost all the peace and happiness for decades. Don't repeat the same mistakes.
ONE AND ONLY ONE
Where we can find prince Reza Pahlavi's debates? I looked everywhere but I couldn't find it.
iran int...in persian ( dubbed ) oxford has not uloaded it yet lol i'm also waiting for the original version... in the meantime watching this BS about bahrain being so free hahahahahaha
The fact that they don't allow recording tells me they can censor whatever they want with impunity
Recording is disturbing to others who want to listen to the discourse. All their debates have this rule
Where is Reza Pahlavi's most recent debate? Please upload it.
He doesn't matter he's not even king? 😅
Can't have an honest dialogue when the participants have been primed with official statements. It means the discussion is political from the outset.
Pick people that have a mind of their own.
Middle east’s Singapore? Are you delusional?
The settlers razed houses and cars yesterday in Nablus. 800 people have lost their homes. More than 30Palestinians are dead since the start of the year
Other Arabs don't care, it seems... Truly sad.
False. And multiple women and babies have been killed by your so called "freedom fighters" after being used as human shield by hamas...
14 innocent synagouge going jews killed in 1 month for the crime of being jews.
@@joshberman9318 they're colonizers.
It's like saying an indigenous attacked a church on their lands in 17th century Americas. The Europeans are invaders butchering them. They will just fight to free their land, no empathy.
Seems perfectly legit. And no one is attacking them for being Jewish. Muslims and Jews have tbe same message from God and very similar cultures and religion.
@@chtadow13 the arabs are colonisers,but they will never admit it,they will just cry and whine while the jews kick they a$$es
It’s so refreshing to see CIVIL discourse.
Colonizing and calling their opposers 'civil' is indeed very... CIVIL. What hypocrisy...
even worse, calling them 'terrorists', when they are fighting to liberate their land from colonizers, is next level blind and hateful.
@@chtadow13 liberating what from whom?..... you mean the place which was the "damascus province of ottomans, protectorate palestine...... who lived there? first time anybody called anybody a palestinian is 1921 by a "palestinian"arab journalist.........liberate what. from whom, For whom? Do what with it? 30% of people calling themselves palestinian came from surroundin places to find jobs in israeli companies ( yeah nobody ever says this lol ). Even from a muslim perspective........quran says it is their land ( jews).....what do muslm say...yeah yeah...but these are not the right jews hahahahahahaha
no I'm no jew
@@farda8473 PFFFFFTTTT! 😂😂
She makes me believe it's definitely a government issue. Not a fan of hers, USA sadly is probably the best home for jews ironically. I pray for the people of the middle east.
So many adverts, turns out you really can put a price on freedom of speech 🤬
The Bahrain guy helpless may curse of God open you.
The was a protest outside the union with way bigger attendance.
no doesn't matter...arabs make kids like animals and lefties are stoned and like protests lol
@@farda8473 Message for the NationState: Burn baby burn. 🔥
Antisemitism in these comments is disgusting, Oxford Union could you please deactivate comments or please delete these vile posts. many thanks
Right, CANCEL them. Freedom of Speech?
Typical Israeli tactics. Talking about Freedom of Speech and not really practising it.
Talking about Abraham, while being atheists.
Talking about Jews while they are not Jews, but white colonialist.
Go ahead, deactivate the comments. COWARDS. Cancel culture twat.
Arabs are a Semitic people, is it right that Js have a monopoly on the idea of “Semitism” and on “anti s” and then use it against Arab peoples who are a Semitic peoples?
All of the enlightenment philosophers had strong and usually negative opinions of Js. You can’t understand the world today or the last century without understanding their power and influence, the war in Iraq will make no sense unless you realise their influence. Look at the book “The J century” or “200 years together”
You want to delete the UN and security council who say Israel is in violation of their resolutions ? Or do you want to delete the security council and human rights watch who attest to the war crimes and Apartheid committed by Israel ? Please specify 😅
@K F the UN made no such declaration. It was specific individuals who made those misguided comments. Oh, that same war crime panel that Iran and Iraq paid through the nose to have their 'observers' on to trump up charges against Israel? The one that didn't bat an eye to those rat vermin dog hamas fighters using babies and pregnant women as body shields? Go away, palestine doesn't exist. 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free! 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸 Revolutionary greetings from the Land of Bhagat Singh 🇮🇳
❤
Definitely not a debate.
Now she wants to tell the Palestinians what to study in their schools
Shame on these traitors.
When they kill Palestinians ,then who terrorist tht time or what those should be called Who killed palestinian people inclusive of children. However in case this issue is resolved by peace it is a great succeful step forward.
It's complicated indeed... Since Abraham with lut following Isaac to Jacob and Esau then Moses to David and Saul or Solomon to John, Christ the last Muhammad... I just say that Jerusalem mainly nor for muslim, christianity and jews only but for all people who want to join in... Those religions come from to the one source... God Allah who always we believe... We can't judge Israel is the worst here too or Palestine truely is bad not not... But waving people who provocate the terrorism is the main evil... I clue to the Hamas that Co-op to the Palestinian citizen especially in Gaza... They are the true terrorism 'Hamas' ... Why i said that because this group claims "they are the true wave who flaging the true Islam but the reality, they are absolutely error... Islam never told like that... They argue that after Islam came to this world, christianity and jews must follow this religion then declare Islam is the best religion then whole religions must follow.... that true mistake... "Islam is fullfil religion not the best", please note it these words... Then we argue jews christianity and Islam are brotherhood... love and equal... About why Israel Occupied many Palestinian teritory, i think it because they defende their people, to make their people save they claimed Palestinian teritory as their own to decrese terrorism like Hamas... I still remember back a day, how Hamas fought with president Yasser Arafat, you know, Palestinian vs Palestinian... Very sad indeed... Hamas is the true terrorism there nor the clean palestinian or Israel who defend their people... Let's fight to clean that radical wave Hamas to make this world better... I support the Palestine as well the clean Israel... Make coperation toward those countries... About jews zionism, i think that personal view... Jews is Moses, christianity is Christ and Islam is Muhammad, God Allah prophets...why we must fight each other ? Someday when he coming again, the true love and the true figure assistent will be preserved this world better again... Insya Allah, Ameen 🌐🇬🇧❤️
you asking the question so stay to listen the answer
😂😂👌🏻
Could see UAE being more of a democracy in 30 years than Israel given current Israeli politics.
The House would assent that the Israeli ambassador's command of English is severely lacking.
Minute 38
Tzipi is her excellency?
I'm still watching. 20 minutes in. The first 20 minutes was not good interviewing, to say the least. Where did this Oxford club select the interviewer from? First 20 minutes on part of the interviewer were inhospitable, positively: disrespectful, and ungracious (not human or down-to-earth nor appropriate given the tone of the room and the weighty topic matter). Lets see if he recovers from his own uber-critical social maladaptation.
The Interrogator seemed to take a bad tone early on, unjustifiably. It's a COMMON TROPE (regardless of topic) in late 19th and early 20th century tone - that of the ascendent (and prideful!) detached neutrality as if we do not exist in a shared universe. That of the interviewer, detached to the n-th degree, taking a sharply negative, superior, almost devilish divide-and-conquer tone to everything and everyone (subtle yet present). How ignorant and posing the interviewer is, in my estimation.
A war of the worlds alien arrives from a distant place and looks at humans like they were ants. Well. This is Oxford and the Middle East - I don't think we're so ignorantly alien to the topics that one another hail from. So why the apparent standoffishness and hostility? The entire room does not seem to match the tone nor intent of the interviewer with his one-way questions (I say, include him in the convo and don't leave his context out - he's part of the universal biological human family tree as well, is he not? Maybe a more down-to-earth tone is required here among those interviewed who are more down-to-earth.) Perhaps the Negative (over Substantive) tone was adopted because the underlying topic was supposed to be Palestine and 'NOT' the Abraham Accords, in his estimation? To which I would respond: 'Which came first? Abraham or those opposed to him? And how and why?'
I am a bit new to the game of international discourses, yet it appears I'm not far behind the game.
To belabor my point, I find the interviewer (whatever his title) a tad too critical, too young (yes), too aloof, too detached, too "divide and conquer" in his questioning and tone - rather than simply impartial and human. As if arriving from some parallel negative universe to inspect these aliens, the underlying approach seems to be toward: "What Have You Done? Are You Indeed United? So You Think These Accords Are So Perfectly Foundational? I, The Inquisitor, Am A Better Judge Than All Of You! Now Justify Yourselves!" It seemed to me that this was the obvious undertone of the interviewer - hyperbole added, of course, to flesh it out with embellishment.
As if the interviewer could speak for himself. I wonder what he has to say for himself, to justify his tone. (For it is not truly impartial tone ...or it would not be so stern as if he was hailing from/with the presence of an enormous prideful standoffish negative without there being an obvious negative, at least not in the first 20 minutes. Rather, in the presence of an enormous positive - the interviewer pretends as if it is almost an enormous negative. I would answer: "Hello, There. We Are Human. We Live On Earth. Permanent, Decentralizing, Multilateral, Economic-Political Peace Is Good. The Abraham Accords Are Good. So How Should We Proceed? - Let That Be The Debate.")
I could use other, more succinct, cultural phraseology that the English and the Americans would be very familiar with. My first response was probably in keeping with what the interviewer's tone may sound like in the back room when not trying to appear formal. (I'll just be polite and call him a young novice and a prideful stuntman.)
Perhaps he adopted this tone of unjustified superiority (and divide and conquer questioning) because there was no 'other side' presented in debate form. So the inquisitor decided to adopt some of the tone of that mysteriously unaccountable 'other side'. As if the Abraham Accords are not a good thing to build with and upon, plain for all to see. As if it was not an historical solution to an historic problem. As if we do not occupy a shared universe and a shared human history with the same concerns of peace everywhere - and this being peace it is a manifestly good thing.
Nothing Is Not Superior To Something. So how shall we moderate between somethings? By recognizing a common Universe of meaning - that exists at the start that we are descended from. And to prevent utter rageful madness, this original Something must include the unified Spirit or Metaphysic that we are all descended from almost as if it were our Designer, Creator, and Father who first made us embodied awarenesses, whereby we even know enough logic to speak, or interview, cogently. (See: Intelligent Design critique and The God Hypothesis) Welcome to the Universe that positively exists while containing boundaries and restraints and justice that some call negative rights. We need to begin from the proposition that we are descended in one family tree, Mankind / Humankind and go from there. The Abraham Accords are aptly named: "In thee, all the families of the earth will be blessed." Take that, Satan.
has nothing to do with the intervier... if he would ask shit, he will never get a job like this lol...i wtached the whole thing......not heard one single semi-intersting thing. This was advertisement
@Far Da,
I've now watched the entire thing. It was a disgrace on part of the hosts. It was false advertising bait and switch. Only the final 2.5 minutes out of 65 minutes, were on the professed topic used to lure people to this repetitive struggle session interrogation, that proceeded to filibuster its own topic. An enormous positive for world peace, and all that this Oxford prank could manage was an attempt to project pessimism in the cause of something that was already answered for, repeatedly. There were no discussion nor questions about Bahrain and UAE in particular or the welfare of those states - other than as follows:
Those present and allowed to speak (other than the 3 being interrogated) favor putting a terrorist organization, Hamas, in charge of determining ALL international deals that Israel makes in the middle east. The same crowd that contains radicals that (even at the debate) chant 'from the river to the sea' meaning: no Israel. So the only way The State of Israel is to make any Peace Deals is if it FIRST ceases to exist. That is the direct logic being DEPLOYED at this discourse about the Abraham Accords. What a farce.
This was not a debate or conversation about the details, hopes, strategies of the Abraham Accords. It was entirely about Palestine, a land that is divided and hostile and remained out of the Abraham Accords at this present time. So Oxford (having hosted & directed it) is responsible for false advertising. The entire thing was a bait and switch dance, precisely to avoid any honest discourse about the Accords themselves.
The entire event worked to invalidate itself. It did not invalidate itself from the standpoint or side of the 3 guests who were gracious and eloquent enough - but the shallow, unproductive, inhospitable invalidation came from the majority of those uttering their voice at the event who were fully distracted by the Palestinian Question, and seemed to not care at all about the Greater Middle East Question.
Interviewer side: (Only a fit of:) But Palestine, But Palestine, But Palestine, But Palestine... Therefore Abraham Accords are entirely in question. Palestine must come first.
Interviewee side: We are all in agreement, we all support the Abraham Accords, we look forward to working together across all the middle east including Palestine. "We want to create that space. We need to be better at dialogue and diplomacy." True. This was not a dialogue, nor was it a varied debate, nor was it diplomatic. It was 3 gracious and intelligent representative guests trying to discourse with a "But Palestine first!" bulldog.
(Over and over and over again. Now, this convo could have been something: if different questions were posed - and if the interviewees decided to postulate about the shared prosperity that was implied but not deeply explored.)
Representatives from 3 countries in the middle east championing a productive political-economic peace pact between 5 or 6 middle eastern countries, and all the representatives in this Oxford Ivory Tower can seem to muster is: "But Palestine first!" By which they mean TO REFUSE any peace will be achieved. This is a line I've heard for over 30 years championed by the same crowd that offers no lasting and positive solutions that are real-world and lasting. Those who take the approach to the Abraham Accords as I saw in the discourse above are not responsible actors or genuinely humanist thinkers. They are malicious fraudsters who probably believe themselves to be activists.
My verdict: Oxford looked ridiculous. Like it was acting against the interest of the regular people all over the world and the peace of their countries. They did not cover the topic they professed to cover, and they allowed their event to proceed (by not proceeding) the way that it did. I'd be surprised if there is another such "discussion". Because if I were those representatives, I wouldn't bother with Oxford again.
Shameless panel
And that woman sat there should be arrested for crimes against humanity…..vile woman
No, she's speaking sense. It's the hamas dogs who should be arrested for crimes against humanity. Vile vermin
@@VincenzoInfi every post 1948 illegal settler should be returned back to where they came from….post haste
What is can disenfranchised and rob the Palestinians best? So far Israel has been leading but it seems no longer to be a one horse race
If it's about Islam joining with Christianity and Judaism, what a joke that is but shouldn't a country like Indonesia be in front since they are the largest Muslim country?
free Palestine 🇵🇸
EEESH! Somebody is eating her way through the UK.
mansoor abulhoul friedays he used to go mosque and Sundays go to church. 😂
Do you not see your own settlements as terrorism are you truly so one eyed as to not see your own faults
I’m a Canaanite, the area of Palestine and Isr43l is our historical homeland, we were there first and want it back, we will probably give it back to the Palestinians, but it’s ours to do with as we please
The earth - the entire universe-was created by God and he chose that land for the children of Israel. His creation- his prerogative. It is all through the Bible from Genesis to Revelation.
Then go take it back like the Jews did. Words are wind.
From a broader perspective they sure make the case for Atheism.
Israelis are 90% atheists, yet preaching the 'Abraham Accords'. Two-faced liars.
It’s more to do with ethnicity than religion or God
The accords were a fig leaf for the illegal occupation
Lmao you're wrong but ok
@@VincenzoInfi am I wrong? They haven’t been. Implemented…..how can you expect the occupied to legitimise its occupier? That’s just nonsense……just because the Europeans don’t really want them back they support the occupation….
Al-Nu’man ibn Bashir reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The parable of the believers in their affection, mercy, and compassion for each other is that of a body. When any limb aches, the whole body reacts with sleeplessness and fever.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 6011, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2586
With that said... I call the governments of UAE, Saudi, Morocco and Sudan COWARDS. How dare you abandon your own people and religion (Arab Muslims). Getting in bed with Israel for money? You're just as bad as the Zionists.
I hope people wake up and revolt against your pro-Colonialist actions. Ameen.
You're deluded.
Lol
@@SikanderG The NationState is on fire, cupcake. LOL backatcha.
FOH
Ameen
A devil sitting in the middle and two of her slaves on both sides 🚩
Yeah all arabs and jews are all came from abraham
One family
Only these new religions separates the one family
Middle east people should think much and analize so well their origin
Love peace kindness and unity of new generation families of abraham are the best solution to all on middle east
Middle east people are beautiful people
Well we all come from Noah, indo Europeans are descendants of Japheth. And Js think the west is a descendant of Edom
We are all came from H. Adam and H. Hawa (Eve).
A TRUE Muslim of the region forsakes his race when it is in direct conflict with his DEEN, Islam taught us that we don;t care much for race, after all we're not racists like Zionists movements.
Even Adam's son, Cain, ended up killing Abel.
We may be sons and daughters of Adam, but murderous intents should NEVER be supported. Murderers should be punished.
And besides, Israelis are not real Jews anyways. They are atheists (90%+) and are talking about Abraham. What a joke.
@@chtadow13 and they could be descendants of Khazars
No till abrtai
The people shouting outside would prefer war than diplomacy
Which diplomacy ? Stealing their land - killing their people ? Alright then - why are you boycotting russia and supporting the ‘occupied ‘ Ukrainians militarily ? Why don’t you support the occupied Palestinians and arm them militarily while boycotting Israel who is in violation of the UN for decades ? Pathetic hypocrites
The settlers took away Peace. Don't twist facts.
Israeli colonial settlers.
@@chtadow13 agree
@@chtadow13 agree
Vatt
Entitled-psychopath brats then uae and lastly bahrain
.
Was Israel created...as a Theocracy ?
.
There are only two flags that mean anything at the moment and that is the flag of the R country (which is at war a the minute), and the Palestine flag. They glow with meaning
Go home…..
Any from Abraham is non peaceful 😂
Looks like hindutva bhakt became jealous as he is not invited
Free Palestine!!
Free the 🇷🇺 people from 🇺🇦!
Palestine will be free ❤🇵🇸
The UAE ambassador is not even an Arab…. He doesn’t know what hes talking about.
British mother raised in Britain serving his MOTHERland perfectly I would say 😂
It is genocide accord .nothing to do with our prophet Ibrahim peace be upon him.
I SAY IT AGAIN SUDAN IS NOT ARAB. MOROCCO IS NORTH AFRICAN SUDAN EAST AFRICAN COUNTRY. THEREFORE CANNOT SIGN ABRAHAM ACCORDS.
Free Palestine!
inshaAllah brother. Bangladesh and other Muslims hold this dear to our hearts. We will work and fight to free Palestine. Your true brothers and sisters are there...
No, peace to Israel.
@@VincenzoInfi No peace to military occupiers regardless of who and where they're.
@@jamalnasir3099 🎯 Exactly. No state, no peace.