GD&T Tutorial 13A : Rule #1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
  • GD&T Tutorial : Rule #1 : Part 1 - In this Video, You will get the explanation of Rule #1 in Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Tutorial
    Presentation Link for Download:
    we have removed the link due to miss use by viewers. Apologies for the inconvenience!
    for more videos and professional courses on GD&T visit lms.prolotek.com
    Rule #1 Statement
    Where only a tolerance of size is specified, the limits of size of an individual regular feature prescribe the extent to which variations in its geometric form as well as in its size are allowed
    Rule #1 is also called as
    1. Perfect Form at MMC Rule
    2. Envelope Principle
    3. Individual FOS Rule
    Rule #1 Requirements
    1. The Actual Local Size of the regular FOS at each cross section shall be within the specified size tolerance
    2. Where a regular FOS is produced at MMC. It must have perfect form
    3. When the actual local size of a regular FOS departs from MMC towards LMC, a variation in form is all0wed equal to the amount of departure.
    4. There is no requirement for a perfect form boundary at LMC. A part produced at its LMC limit of size, is permitted to have maximum form variation up to MMC Boundary
    5. Rule #1 applies to regular Feature if size only.
    Rule #1 Does not control the location, or orientation of feature of size, hence it is called Individual Feature of Size Rule.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @akhilchristapher7529
    @akhilchristapher7529 4 роки тому +6

    Rule one is not applicable to the indicated dimension because the part produced at MMC should be in perfect form.
    If I'm wrong please correct me

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +16

      Partially Correct, Rule #1 can not be applied to Irregular FOS, the Arrow is pointing to Irregular FOS

    • @akhilchristapher7529
      @akhilchristapher7529 4 роки тому

      @@PalaniKailash sir how can I know that the shown picture is having irregular FOS. because it is not showing any tolerance.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +10

      Please view my video on Feature of Size, in which i have explained about identifying irregular feature of size type A.
      The arrow in the drawing is pointing to irregular feature of size type A in the question asked in this video.
      How I have answered your question

    • @akhilchristapher7529
      @akhilchristapher7529 4 роки тому +7

      @@PalaniKailash thank you for the quick response
      I have watched the video.
      So it can't be measured by using vernier caliper because it is not having a perfect circularity.

    • @yogeshgupta3572
      @yogeshgupta3572 3 роки тому +2

      this is Irregular FOS because there are break in internal dia (regular FOS, ) by tooth.

  • @yogeshshinde9400
    @yogeshshinde9400 4 роки тому +1

    You are doing great Job sir. I become your fan sir. 😊😁

  • @prashkaushal9471
    @prashkaushal9471 Рік тому

    Great sir thanks 👍🙂😀😃😊

  • @urielhernandez6163
    @urielhernandez6163 4 роки тому +2

    HI Palani, I think the answer is no, because the indicated diameter is an irregular FOS and the rule # 1 only applied in regular FOS. I will appreciate your opinion or correction.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +3

      You are Right
      Hope, now you have clarity on Rule #1.
      I will upload video on Rule #2 Shortly
      Feel free to ask for Any other topic

  • @simrannagi3297
    @simrannagi3297 3 роки тому

    No rule 1 does not apply on this as there is no control of inner profile dia 59/61 with respect to outer diameter. So inner profile should be controlled concentrically from outer profile. Otherwise during its mating with mating part there may be problem and if it is not concentrically controlled then teeth size can vary because of shifting of centres.

  • @Kallem5598
    @Kallem5598 4 роки тому +1

    Rule#1 doesn't apply to the figure shown in the question as it is an irregular FOS and rule#1 is applicable to regular FOS

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +1

      You are right, Rule #1 does not apply

  • @akshayk6437
    @akshayk6437 2 роки тому

    Answer is no, since it is not a regular feature of size.. Correct me if I'm wrong

  • @srotadas2107
    @srotadas2107 3 роки тому +1

    Hi Sir, I think it is not applicable for Rule-1, as the feature is an irregular FOS type A and the Rule 1 is applicable for regular size.

  • @prakashdeshpande8785
    @prakashdeshpande8785 2 роки тому

    Imagine a Dia 60 H7 ( 60.000 /60.045 ) hole is to be controlled for cylindricity. As per the rule 1, if the hole is at MMC, its form must be perfect. Further, if the hole departs from MMC, some deviation at cylindricity can be allowed depending upon the actual size of the hole, but not beyond 60.045. All this will mean that the second chamber of the feature control frame has to indicate 0.00 permissible tolerance with M modifier. But the M modifier is not allowed for cylindricity. This characteristic allows only RFS modifier. How to resolve this controversy ?

  • @David_HX
    @David_HX Рік тому

    To answer the question at the end of this video: I think not - Simply because the Diameter of 69/59 is stated as a "Basic Dimension" and is not associated with a FCF denoting which tolerance type, I.E. Cylindricity, Circularity with any modifiers (or lack of) such as MMC or LMC - Assuming it is RFS is a bad assumption when the entire format is outside of a Feature Control Frame as a GD&T associated dimension should be -

  • @kshitizsinha2945
    @kshitizsinha2945 4 роки тому +2

    Sir in the question the said feature of size can be measured by an vernier callipers. So how it is an irregular feature of size. we dont need an actual mating envelope to measure the diameter

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      can you be specific please, because, your question is not clearly understood by me

  • @jagadeshyuganth2411
    @jagadeshyuganth2411 3 роки тому

    Your explanation good

  • @nabarajgairhe6152
    @nabarajgairhe6152 Рік тому

    Rule no 1 dose not apply in this because, this is not regular feature of size. Diameter can be measured at the tooth, but its not regularu.

  • @surenthramm1158
    @surenthramm1158 4 роки тому

    the final ques- ans is no, rule #1 wont applied to that shape. because it is irregular feature of size and rule 1 applies to regular FOS

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      Answers in this video
      ua-cam.com/video/SoEwGp1vHG0/v-deo.html

  • @venkatshivareddy7801
    @venkatshivareddy7801 3 роки тому

    Hello sir,
    Limit dimensions are given, it means rule no 1 is applicable. we can apply.

  • @rlee4795
    @rlee4795 4 роки тому

    It will be nice if you could reference which statement/sentence/section was referred to for all the requirements stated in the video. Thank you for the videos. Good job.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      Thanks for the suggestion, will consider in next coming videos

  • @shivambahalaskar2873
    @shivambahalaskar2873 Рік тому

    Because given geometry is not a regular feature of size

  • @kalpitkatpara4363
    @kalpitkatpara4363 Рік тому

    Rule no1 doesn’t apply in this case cause it’s not a feature of size.

  • @udayunwin7648
    @udayunwin7648 4 роки тому +1

    NO...
    and its a regular feature of size by seeing but it's a imaginary ( pcd ). rule no-1 does not apply on imaginary of feature of size
    correct.. my answer

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      the question in this video is already answered, please see my previous comments

  • @rahulvenkat9963
    @rahulvenkat9963 Рік тому

    Rule one will not be applicable because it is irregular feature of size dimension

  • @Pavankumar-be7ir
    @Pavankumar-be7ir Рік тому

    Since it is an Irregular FOS rule #1 can't applicable

  • @rakeshakiwate5644
    @rakeshakiwate5644 4 роки тому

    thank you very much for the videos

  • @DreamDynamicz
    @DreamDynamicz 4 роки тому +2

    hi palani sir, as we know the feature (regular) can have maximum form deviation when it is at LMC, is it possible to have all the form deviations at maximum level in LMC, like max straightness error + max cylindricity error

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +2

      if i have understood your question properly. for one limit of size dimension, if the size is at LMC, all the form errors will be at its Max condition

  • @prashkaushal9471
    @prashkaushal9471 Рік тому

    Great

  • @amoghmangalam3130
    @amoghmangalam3130 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much for video

  • @balaji511
    @balaji511 4 роки тому +1

    I think much more detail explanation of the statement would be better. If it hurts sorry for that

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +1

      more information is given in part 2, hope you have over looked it while putting your comments

  • @nayeemrahiman3230
    @nayeemrahiman3230 3 роки тому

    What if the part is completely straight with LMC. will this obey rule 1

  • @vinayaknilajkar3586
    @vinayaknilajkar3586 4 роки тому

    Dose the Rule #1 applies to internal dimensions like holes, slots etc? If then things are opposite when it comes to FOS, MMC & LMC?

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      yes, Rule #1 applies to both external and internal FOS dimensions

  • @akshaynimkar2458
    @akshaynimkar2458 4 роки тому

    The arrow show only feature not the feature of size. Rule 1 applied only to regular fos.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/SoEwGp1vHG0/v-deo.html
      check this video for answer

  • @prakashdeshpande8785
    @prakashdeshpande8785 Рік тому

    Any reply to my earlier query raised six months ago?

  • @shivarajnavalba5042
    @shivarajnavalba5042 4 роки тому +1

    No bcoz its irregular shape.

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +3

      Your answer is right but the reason is not right.
      This is an example of Irregular Feature of Size and Rule #1 applies to Regular Feature of Size Only

  • @SabariPrabakaran3434
    @SabariPrabakaran3434 4 роки тому

    Where can i get pure basic knowledge about Gd &t when i am not clear about what is meaning for feature,mmc,lmc.....please i want to learn from zero...

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому

      If you are looking for book
      You can download from
      prolotek.com/downloads/
      If you are looking for training contact me on 9886371971

    • @SabariPrabakaran3434
      @SabariPrabakaran3434 4 роки тому

      @@PalaniKailash sure sir..

  • @vijayprasath7768
    @vijayprasath7768 4 роки тому

    Sir can you please leave the answer with video. Because I can't understand answer clearly

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +1

      separate videos are uploaded for answers, please chck

  • @amoghmangalam3130
    @amoghmangalam3130 4 роки тому

    Why MMC envelope is taken for Rule 1 ?

    • @PalaniKailash
      @PalaniKailash  4 роки тому +1

      When there is no GD&T control applied, then with limits of size, if we have to ensure assembly between two mating parts, then that is possible only when we consider MMC boundary.
      For Example:
      Take two parts
      01 Shaft with upper limit Dia. 20 - MMC will be 20
      01 Bush with lower limit Dia. 20 - MMC will be 20
      These two parts can be assembled with '0' clearance
      If either the shaft or the hole exceed the MMC boundary, then assembly is not possible.

    • @amoghmangalam3130
      @amoghmangalam3130 4 роки тому

      @@PalaniKailash great . Thanks sir

  • @tejaschavan9824
    @tejaschavan9824 2 роки тому

    No