Neil is a scientist whom has character, he is not fake.. his knowledge has not make him arrogant... the more he knows the more he respects ignorance.. He has not left us the ordinary people behind.. he is pure love. thank you for all NDT..
Thank you for uploading these lectures!!! I have wanted to revisit these for so long, but during one of the several moves in my life, I have lost ALL of my lectures I had collected. The box of tapes was inadvertently placed on top of the box which held 45 pounds of my neodymium magnets. Foolishly, I labeled the the magnet box, but not the box of tapes.
😮😮I enjoy Dr. Tyson because he says things at my level. He is an effective communicator. . . . . I have tried reading and listening to well known scientists but they are way over my head and I get bored. Maybe someday I will learn enough to understand the other scientists. . I am not stupid. I have college degree and work in an area not related to science.
Yes, diet pepsi cans floats, regular pepsi cans sink. Not a mystery, sugar water is a bit heavier than water. Pour sugar on the water in the cooler, or salt for that matter, and the regular can of pepsi will surface from the bottom.
It's due to a few reasons. First, he repeats himself verbatim. Often. I also listen to Sean Carroll, Brian Cox, Janna Levin, and others. They don't repeat themselves like Neill does. (btw I don't mean repeating yourself for learning purposes. I mean repeating yourself cuz it's easy and a quick soundbite. Like a politician giving the same stump speech over and over) 2nd, he gets stuff wrong in ways I don't understand. For example, he said The JWST is in earth's shadow on a few occasions. Absolutely false, and he has to know that. Also his bit about the billiard ball is wrong. Or at least incomplete. 3rd, his hubris is annoying. On a recent Star Talk with Wendy Freedman, she said there was not evidence there would be a "big rip" and he basically told a working scientist "you're wrong." I'm glad it happened at the end of the show cuz I turned it off after that. And that interaction happens fairly often.
He might be a great entertainer, but as a science communicator he's garbage because he's just so wrong so often or exaggerates things to make topics seem more dramatic.
Neil Degrasse Tyson and Richard Feynman. They didn’t care about being jargonistic, and are all the better for it. I’m sure others fit the mold, Bill Nye, Adam Savage and Michio Kaku have earned my respect for these regards, but I’m especially attached to these sorts of lectures.
Neil deGrasse tyson, at his best, is brilliant. Usually, however, he is a loudmouth bully. Pictures of Iron Man. [Richard Feynman!] was a certified genius in many ways, particularly as a teacher.
Michio Kaku is horrible! He just cares about getting in front of a camera and making people think "oh wow, he's really smart!" Take a critical look at him. Really, he's the worst.
He is a very smart guy who has worked very hard to get to where he is. Which is a professional physicist and (at his best) brilliant explainer of astrophysics and the like to the public.
You've said you'd like to meet Sir Isaac Newton if you could go back in time... But Bruno is the guy I'd like to meet. He just seems like a kindred spirit. (... except for... I suck at math... lol )
It's a disturbing testimonial about our society when 1,100 people have watched this presentation in the past year, but 6.3 million have watched a video of someone named Kardashian allegedly taking a dump in the salad bar at Wendy's.
The problem with Neil (if you want to consider it a problem...and you may not) is that I don't know of any important discovery he's made. What he does well is he's a great explicator. Not an inconsiderable accomplishment. But in terms of doing basic science (like Murray Gell-Mann, for instance, or Steven Weinberg), that's not his strength. So, I don't see him as "great" or as a "genius." But I do think he's very good at explaining mathematical complexities -- which can only be fully understood mathematically -- in plain English, explanations that come close to their mathematical equivalents. That's hard to do, and it takes a lot of training and experience to do well. But genius, greatness??? I'd reserve those descriptions for someone like Andrea Ghez or Roger Penrose or the other great discoverers. They're the people who write the scripts that Neil then interprets and explicates in ways most people can understand. I think even Neil would agree with me.
OMG! that's the great courses! not the awful modern carsalesman version. this is vintage! note how he doesn't look at a different camera every five seconds. or prance back and forth. oh, no! no rostrum. this is not a good sign....
Neil degrasse Tyson said these 4 are our most common in the universe, 1.oxygen 2. Nitrogen 3. Hydrogen 4. Carbon..... Does anybody else see the fault in this?
This was back in the day when Tyson was actually doing science instead of talking about it's importance. These days it's like he's done a complete 180 promoting the scientific fallacy that is transgenderism. It's a complete contradiction of everything he's been talking about his entire career
its mind-boggling how a grown man can actually believe so much nonsense. the amount of waste forced and caused by pretty much all of the theories presented in the video will be a case study for the next generation.
What’s man boggling to me as you think you’re so much smarter than Neil Tyson get a break buddy grow up don’t be so oppositional and defiant. You should’ve left that behind it around eight years old.
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist. How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists? Your comment is rediculous
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist. How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists? Your comment is rediculous
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist. How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists? Your comment is rediculous
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist. How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists? Your comment is rediculous
Wish you would come over to Britain and do a tv series! The British public would love ya Neil!..Come on BBC, this is why we pay our TV license,. Give the public what we want!!
This is why people watch what they want online. No license required. It's free. It's available on demand at anytime. If you are relying on the BBC then you are living in the past.
@@keepgoing1973 I don't. But it annoyes me having to pay for stuff i never, ever watch. The BBC is antiquated, and way past its sell buy date. So bias as well!!....If they commisioned people like Tyson, Green and Dawkins, then it might "just be worthwhile watching now and again!!
Neil is a scientist whom has character, he is not fake.. his knowledge has not make him arrogant... the more he knows the more he respects ignorance.. He has not left us the ordinary people behind.. he is pure love. thank you for all NDT..
Okay, settle down
Thank you for uploading these lectures!!! I have wanted to revisit these for so long, but during one of the several moves in my life, I have lost ALL of my lectures I had collected. The box of tapes was inadvertently placed on top of the box which held 45 pounds of my neodymium magnets. Foolishly, I labeled the the magnet box, but not the box of tapes.
I really like channels like this one. Channels that entertain as well as educate. Thanks.
Need more like this
Dude, I used to watch this all the time like 7 years ago. I've been trying to find it forever. Thank you so fucking much
I first checked it out from the Santa Clara Library in 2003. Back when Neil wasn't such a well known celebrity.
This guy is so Smart. Carl Sagan league smart.
Saw him live last week. Great lecture.
Neil does the best lectures hands down. Brian Greene still makes me nod off.
@turdlok feel like brian speaks to fast and too much into one small segment
@@TurdLocked Brian Cox has better documentaries than Neil's Cosmos in my opinion.
Agree...truly intelligent.. to the nth degree.. wow.. love the way his mind works.. it's always something new.. never repetitive
Thank you for posting Neil!!
Sweetie, it's not Dr Tyson that's posting
@@annettegustafson1435 I think what he meant was “thank you for posting content that has niel”
@Mo No, he meant to say thank you for posting it on UA-cam which he he not
😮😮I enjoy Dr. Tyson because he says things at my level. He is an effective communicator. . . . . I have tried reading and listening to well known scientists but they are way over my head and I get bored. Maybe someday I will learn enough to understand the other scientists. . I am not stupid. I have college degree and work in an area not related to science.
I agree. At his best, like here, Neil deGrasse Tyson is brilliant.
Unfortunately, he is often a loud mouth bully.
Yes, diet pepsi cans floats, regular pepsi cans sink. Not a mystery, sugar water is a bit heavier than water. Pour sugar on the water in the cooler, or salt for that matter, and the regular can of pepsi will surface from the bottom.
I don't understand why there are haters who don't see Neil's greatness.
It's due to a few reasons. First, he repeats himself verbatim. Often. I also listen to Sean Carroll, Brian Cox, Janna Levin, and others. They don't repeat themselves like Neill does. (btw I don't mean repeating yourself for learning purposes. I mean repeating yourself cuz it's easy and a quick soundbite. Like a politician giving the same stump speech over and over)
2nd, he gets stuff wrong in ways I don't understand. For example, he said The JWST is in earth's shadow on a few occasions. Absolutely false, and he has to know that. Also his bit about the billiard ball is wrong. Or at least incomplete.
3rd, his hubris is annoying. On a recent Star Talk with Wendy Freedman, she said there was not evidence there would be a "big rip" and he basically told a working scientist "you're wrong." I'm glad it happened at the end of the show cuz I turned it off after that. And that interaction happens fairly often.
He might be a great entertainer, but as a science communicator he's garbage because he's just so wrong so often or exaggerates things to make topics seem more dramatic.
His greatness at being a charlatan?
Pure contrarianism.
@@jimc.goodfellas226 how is he a charlatan? I dare you to answer.
Instead of a rubber duckie, Neil wanted a little rubber Saturn. 😂 lmao
7:48 Niel says we have to be cleverer than that. Is cleverer even a word Neil? Nonetheless; my favorite astrophysicist of all time.
This is just like Jennifer Garner correcting Conan's grammar.
clev·er
adjective
comparative adjective: cleverer
IMHO, Carl Sagan was the best there's ever been.
I'm a big fan of Brian Green. His PBS specials I think are excellent.
Neil Degrasse Tyson and Richard Feynman.
They didn’t care about being jargonistic, and are all the better for it.
I’m sure others fit the mold, Bill Nye, Adam Savage and Michio Kaku have earned my respect for these regards, but I’m especially attached to these sorts of lectures.
Neil deGrasse tyson, at his best, is brilliant. Usually, however, he is a loudmouth bully.
Pictures of Iron Man. [Richard Feynman!] was a certified genius in many ways, particularly as a teacher.
Michio Kaku is horrible! He just cares about getting in front of a camera and making people think "oh wow, he's really smart!" Take a critical look at him. Really, he's the worst.
Dr. NEIL is awesome!
looks like the same room Alex Fillipenenko did a series of lectures . Fasinating
Fascinating*
@@jhonnyhoestar Ok spelling Nazi
Nature understands.
Keep it simple .
(I wish more big brains could grasp this...)
He's ok with solo lectures, but insufferable in interviews or group discussions.
Love this !
Man, he is nailing that Shat-speak.
What?
I hear Carl Sagan in his voice.
Neil did host Cosmos 2...
I have listened to many niel post, I'm an old retiered carpenter. Golly geez, I could have been a Dr of astro phisics ;)
I'm sure you could school Neil on just a sample of building codes!
love this! what year was this filmed? early 2000s? late 90s?
Has to be late 90s
They mention the 2000s in the beginning so it's probably early 2000s
Great Courses stuff just looks old.
He is a brilliant scientist who just happens to be a black man.His achievements are proof that you can be anything you want to be
But ONLY if one makes the effort. Anything you want to be is not a default outcome for anyone, regardless of what mommy and daddy says.
He is a very smart guy who has worked very hard to get to where he is. Which is a professional physicist and (at his best) brilliant explainer of astrophysics and the like to the public.
Good god, this video came straight out of 8th grade science class
Starfox skewed my sense of the asteroid belt, and possibly space in general.
Yeah but WHICH starfox!?
@@BoonTobias80 64
I wonder, if black holes transmute even heavier elements than what is on our periodic table?
Look into "Hawking Radiation" and the answer will radiate itself upon you.
But I will offer a short answer for the moment... They do not.
You've said you'd like to meet Sir Isaac Newton if you could go back in time...
But Bruno is the guy I'd like to meet.
He just seems like a kindred spirit.
(... except for... I suck at math... lol )
I gather that Newton was not just a plagiarist and bully but also a deeply unpleasant man.
Sometimes when he's not being a loud mouth bully Neil deGrasse Tyson can actually be pretty awesome.
Mister rogers
If you use science fiction on which to base your radiometric dating methods, you can get some pretty accurate timelines for evolution theory.
I’m glad that someone named turd lock reposted this
😊😊
@TurdLocked
You wouldnt happen to be from Turlock, Ca by any chance? I grew up there ... THS class of 2001
I live in Modesto right now. I lived in Turlock up until 2015, Ceres and by far the worst town would have to be Keyes. What a nightmare!
Lmao the anti copyright at the beginning stating personal use only 😂
Thanks for dropping this one turd !!
dropping 😂
Where's the sound?
No sound? I'll have to review the clip and identify my poor editing skills and then it will be fixed. Thank you for the heads up.
It's a disturbing testimonial about our society when 1,100 people have watched this presentation in the past year, but 6.3 million have watched a video of someone named Kardashian allegedly taking a dump in the salad bar at Wendy's.
Nigel for president
I ate too much cheese and now i have turd lok.
The problem with Neil (if you want to consider it a problem...and you may not) is that I don't know of any important discovery he's made. What he does well is he's a great explicator. Not an inconsiderable accomplishment. But in terms of doing basic science (like Murray Gell-Mann, for instance, or Steven Weinberg), that's not his strength. So, I don't see him as "great" or as a "genius." But I do think he's very good at explaining mathematical complexities -- which can only be fully understood mathematically -- in plain English, explanations that come close to their mathematical equivalents. That's hard to do, and it takes a lot of training and experience to do well. But genius, greatness??? I'd reserve those descriptions for someone like Andrea Ghez or Roger Penrose or the other great discoverers. They're the people who write the scripts that Neil then interprets and explicates in ways most people can understand. I think even Neil would agree with me.
You make a good point. One thing to add is for many years he has run the Hayden planetarium. Which is another way he brings science to the public.
You must feel very, very small
Sanda Bullock and George Clooney is/are sexy-squared
They are 20 years past their prime, perhaps 30. They remind me of expired milk still in the fridge.
OMG! that's the great courses! not the awful modern carsalesman version. this is vintage! note how he doesn't look at a different camera every five seconds. or prance back and forth. oh, no! no rostrum. this is not a good sign....
Доктор Тайсън не може да се спасите от ада ще останат една шепа хора и всичко започва от,,,0,,,, Ангел 2312, на 22 12 година,
How about a big fat no.
Neil degrasse Tyson said these 4 are our most common in the universe, 1.oxygen 2. Nitrogen 3. Hydrogen 4. Carbon..... Does anybody else see the fault in this?
pure click bait
This was back in the day when Tyson was actually doing science instead of talking about it's importance. These days it's like he's done a complete 180 promoting the scientific fallacy that is transgenderism. It's a complete contradiction of everything he's been talking about his entire career
Couldn’t agree more, he has mixed up his opinions with fact these days. Using his reputation to push his ideology
@@dpaul1148what. Talking about facts isn't an ideology l. You realize that? Wow you are .. Nevermind
its mind-boggling how a grown man can actually believe so much nonsense. the amount of waste forced and caused by pretty much all of the theories presented in the video will be a case study for the next generation.
I don't believe in boggling minds.
What’s man boggling to me as you think you’re so much smarter than Neil Tyson get a break buddy grow up don’t be so oppositional and defiant. You should’ve left that behind it around eight years old.
He's a fake. Hasn't done any science in years.
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist.
How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists?
Your comment is rediculous
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist.
How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists?
Your comment is rediculous
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist.
How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists?
Your comment is rediculous
He's a science educator who runs a planetarium, not a working scientist.
How many high school and college science teachers are still working scientists?
Your comment is rediculous
Exactly, exactly, exactly, did I say exactly? That is amazing!
Neil is so overrated.
Kind of a blowhard know it all too. A union carpenter could stump him I'm sure
Wish you would come over to Britain and do a tv series! The British public would love ya Neil!..Come on BBC, this is why we pay our TV license,. Give the public what we want!!
This is why people watch what they want online.
No license required.
It's free.
It's available on demand at anytime.
If you are relying on the BBC then you are living in the past.
@@keepgoing1973 I don't. But it annoyes me having to pay for stuff i never, ever watch. The BBC is antiquated, and way past its sell buy date. So bias as well!!....If they commisioned people like Tyson, Green and Dawkins, then it might "just be worthwhile watching now and again!!
Lol silly child
@@Jay-ft3xh ???
If you where awake in school you know this, if you think you will learn it now you are wrong. You will stay ignorant or you are smart already.
So there was a time when neil had humility. A little ego regression would serve this man and his mission quite well.
Yes hes turned himself into a "personality" .
I like him now.
Your problem is that you are worried about the personality so much that you can't appreciate the mission
This lecture is fine. His interviews and group discussions are insufferable as he constantly interrupts and talks over everyone else.
@@KKMDStyle well said