"America is strong enough to attack Afganistan". Yes PJ, but not strong enough to defeat it. And yes George W did prove the warmonger many of us knew he would be. Two clever centrists proving how stupid clever centrists can be.
O’Rourke never sounds so impressive whenever he’s up against a citizen of the crown. Wonder why? His comments about Bush haven’t aged well, nor his warnings against isolationism. It seems specious of him to suggest that Christianity hasn’t had its own problems in the USA, where it seems quite a lot of people don’t actually like the separation of church and state. And James is an atheist. He was only Presbyterian by birth.
@@oscarwilde5473 The article was so absurd that they mention the Roe v Wade decision (????) but didn't include the actual explanations for the Church and State decisions by the judges themselves. Again, where are the explanations for the decisions by the judges, because every Supreme Court decision has a full explanation after the decision. Conveniently left out by the writers of the article, and yourself. Give me a break.
"America is strong enough to attack Afganistan". Yes PJ, but not strong enough to defeat it. And yes George W did prove the warmonger many of us knew he would be.
Two clever centrists proving how stupid clever centrists can be.
O’Rourke never sounds so impressive whenever he’s up against a citizen of the crown. Wonder why?
His comments about Bush haven’t aged well, nor his warnings against isolationism. It seems specious of him to suggest that Christianity hasn’t had its own problems in the USA, where it seems quite a lot of people don’t actually like the separation of church and state.
And James is an atheist. He was only Presbyterian by birth.
Give an example of some Americans not liking the separation of church and state..
@@tomcarl8021 Try becoming the president without being a christian.
@@stephenb8353 If America could elect Barack Obama it's entirely capable of electing a non-Christain. It's 2021. Stop pretending it's not.
@@oscarwilde5473 The first sentence proves the bias of the article. And Reuters is famous for it.
@@oscarwilde5473 The article was so absurd that they mention the Roe v Wade decision (????) but didn't include the actual explanations for the Church and State decisions by the judges themselves.
Again, where are the explanations for the decisions by the judges, because every Supreme Court decision has a full explanation after the decision.
Conveniently left out by the writers of the article, and yourself.
Give me a break.