Get $300 PER DAY For FREE From AI Art (New Method)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 чер 2024
  • Learn how to turn FREE AI art into FREE cash!
    ► Get my FREE $10,000 Print On Demand ebook: wholesaleted.com/4-step
    ► Get My Print On Demand Course: theecommclubhouse.com
    ► Get the DALL-E 2 AI art generator: labs.openai.com/
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    WATCH MY MOST POPULAR VIDEOS:
    ►► How I Make $1,000/Day From 5 Sources Of Income: • How I Built 5 Income S...
    ►► How To Start A T-Shirt Business For Free: • Start A T-Shirt Busine...
    ►► 100 Apps & Websites To Earn Free Money: • 100 Websites & Apps To...
    ►► Get $10,000/Month Uploading Basic Videos: • Get $10,000 A Month Fo...
    ►► The REAL Reason I Became A Millionaire: • The REAL Reason I Beca...
    RECOMMENDED WATCHING - My "Legal Stuff" Playlist:
    ►► • Do NOT Sell These Prin...
    Got any questions about "legal stuff" like copyrights, trademarks & refunds? Chances are, by watching these videos, you'll have most of your questions answered!
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    WHOLESALE TED AFFILIATE LINKS
    A lot of people have requested that I posted my affiliate links so that they can register through them as a thank-you for my free tutorial content on UA-cam. Thank you so much for your support! If you would like to use my affiliate links, I would greatly appreciate it as it enables me to keep making UA-cam videos for free:
    ►► Get A FREE 14-Day Trial To Shopify: wholesaleted.com/go/free-shop...
    ►► Get My Favorite Graphic Design App Canva: wholesaleted.com/go/canva
    ►► Get My Favorite Lifestyle Photos On Placeit: wholesaleted.com/go/placeit
    ►► Get The Etsy Research App Alura: wholesaleted.com/go/alura
    ►► Use Printify's Print On Demand App Like I Do: wholesaleted.com/go/printify
    ►► Use Printful's Print On Demand App Like I Do: wholesaleted.com/go/printful
    Please note: an affiliate link tracks whether you click on the link, and register and/or make a purchase. If you do, I may get a commission. Using affiliate links is optional but again, it enables me to keep making my UA-cam tutorial content free & I greatly appreciate the support, thank you!
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA!
    ►► Follow Sarah on TikTok: / sarahchrisp
    ►► Follow Sarah's Adventures on Instagram: / sarahchrispy
    ►► Like us on Facebook: / wholesaleted
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    VIDEO CHAPTERS:
    0:00 - Generate FREE AI Art To Turn Into Cash
    3:15 - Money Method #1
    6:07 - Money Method #2
    10:16 - AI Image Enlarger Trick
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    WHY SUBSCRIBE TO WHOLESALE TED?
    Hey there I am Sarah (aka Ted). My goal is to help new entrepreneurs grow & scale a business that is right for THEM!
    Yes: the right business for THEM. Because there is no "best business" - there are just different businesses. Here on this channel, my mission is to help everyone choose a business to pursue that is right for them. And so a business that I enjoy running, may not be one that you would enjoy.
    Because here is the truth when it comes to building a business: it isn't a way to get rich fast. Nope. A business is simply when you learn to do these 3 things really well:
    1) Creating or finding great products/services to sell.
    2) Putting those products in front of the right customers.
    3) Giving those customers a great reason to buy.
    And each person will have their own journey to get there with a LOT of hard work & sacrifices along the way 💪👊 which is why I believe that choosing the right business that you are passionate about is crucial! Here are some ways that I help new entrepreneurs do that:
    * I show case studies of my businesses that I own & I enjoy running (such as Print On Demand ecommerce businesses), sharing my tips & strategies I've learned along the way.
    * I show case studies of other businesses that other entrepreneurs enjoy (even if I personally wouldn't want to do them myself!).
    * I make videos answering some of the "legal" questions people have when creating a new business (such as questions about copyrights & trademarks).
    * Plus there is a sprinkle of entrepreneurial motivation thrown in too!
    I hope my actionable content can help you: whether you're running your own online business, or are in the process of building one, and want some tactical advice to help you along the way. If that is you, subscribe today! 🔥
    RECOMMENDED WATCHING - Having Realistic Expectations In Business:
    ►► • Mindset For Success: H...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @WholesaleTed
    @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +670

    My New Zealand accent translation for those of you that are new around here 🤭
    Frie = Free
    Itsie = Etsy
    Coffiye = Coffee
    What other ones did a miss? 👀

    • @shiva.chennai
      @shiva.chennai Рік тому +13

      For me, Every accent is comfortable.American, UK, Australian, Newzies. Etc. I am most comfortable with American accent.

    • @jandmharper
      @jandmharper Рік тому +2

      One of the Ukiyo-e images that you showed was pretty explicit. your content is usually pretty clean, so not sure if you realized that was in there or not. Just wanted to let you know.

    • @Misiogry
      @Misiogry Рік тому +5

      Your way of speaking in general was pretty hurtful to my ears 2 years ago and then 1 year ago, but... I must admit that you really improved your way of speaking and while your movies were informative back then but infuriating on your presence side, now they're not only better told but also contain much more valuable information. It's a very nice addition to see tht you're constantly riding your waves and you're owning them instead of just floating on their surface. I truly wish you much more money and even more satisfaction from it.
      Sincere 'thank you' from Poland.

    • @gemmasjourneys
      @gemmasjourneys Рік тому +1

      😂

    • @saulgoodman2018
      @saulgoodman2018 Рік тому +2

      The T is silent in Christmas.

  • @TascaSkelton
    @TascaSkelton Рік тому +188

    As an artist who has spent the better part of my life refining and developing my skills, this is incredibly sad :(

    • @asimhero2057
      @asimhero2057 Рік тому +36

      You're still better than ai because you've feelings and best art comes from the feeling, I'm sure if you use these ai you can create more than a common person creates. So you're always on top dude

    • @neakapla
      @neakapla Рік тому +13

      You have soul dude. There will always be a place for sincere artists. Your audience will find you, don't get disheartened. AI is just another tool

    • @MrStoltverd
      @MrStoltverd Рік тому +14

      AI creates products. It can't pour meaning or feelings behind aesthetic decisions. You can. You make art

    • @amnaal-abadi3864
      @amnaal-abadi3864 Рік тому +2

      I will pay for your art and not from a seller that got his art for free in seconds

    • @badiprof6310
      @badiprof6310 Рік тому +1

      @@asimhero2057
      No Bot can speak like a human.
      No Bot can draw like a human.
      No bot can take shots like a human.
      And no bot can satisfy a woman.
      AI, wrongly called art, is for free or for some bucks. But my Art is for
      hundreds maybe thousands of dollars. because it's the real and the Original Art.

  • @Elnato23
    @Elnato23 Рік тому +33

    AI art just frustrates me so much, shitting on the talent and man hours that goes into producing high quality art, going to put creatives out of a job so people can make more profit

    • @ruthcadioli7403
      @ruthcadioli7403 Рік тому +6

      Right, asides from the fact it is in fact IP THEFT. Use without permission. I mean, to those who want to, by all means use it, but do so with YOUR OWN WORK! Figure out your own unique style, do not COPY AND STEAL from the work of others.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +3

      Just to clarify, a "signature art style" is not protected by copyrights and is not a form of intellectual property and is not IP theft. Anyone is allowed to draw/paint etc in any "style" that they want: www.thelegalartist.com/blog/you-cant-copyright-style
      If "styles" were copyrighted, it would mean then that many forms of art could not exist. For example, all artists who wish to paint in a realism style now could not, for only one person would ever be allowed to do that, which would make no sense.
      Everyone, including AI, is allowed to draw in any "style" that they want - there is no copyright protection and it is not an IP.

    • @iRaven23
      @iRaven23 Рік тому +9

      ​@@WholesaleTed Article you put is talking about HUMANS , not machines. AI cannot draw, it can generate images based on whever you put in the database, it is not drawing. Putting copyrighted images into a software should be illegal and I sincerly hope there will be some laws placed soon regarding the issue. Whatever image ai will spit out is not yours, you didnt make it so you have no rights to it. I can sell exact same image you will generate since it's not copyrighted.
      It's so sad how everyone wants to be an artist yet they have no respect to actual artists. It's disgusting
      If you want to be an artist so much just grab a pencil and learn how to draw.

    • @syafiqahasseggaf
      @syafiqahasseggaf Рік тому +4

      @@WholesaleTed its not about style. Its not about its not art. Its not about its allowed or not. Its about art ethic. Right now it's allowed. But soon it will not be. You of course only care about profit and set aside the ethic.
      I really hope things are changing with the movement that C.A.A do. Its already ground on serious matters for us artist and have no doubt that this won't stay as it is.

    • @ProblematicRat
      @ProblematicRat Рік тому +6

      People can be really selfish when it comes to this. All they want is more money but no real meaning to it.

  • @cherylbrucecreativ
    @cherylbrucecreativ Рік тому +409

    This makes me so sad for the future of actual artists using their hard practiced skills

    • @tvoovm7254
      @tvoovm7254 Рік тому +12

      What's also worse is that digital artists make more money than traditional artists who put the work in.

    • @Golden504
      @Golden504 Рік тому +16

      @@odesamusic already happened now we got ai that writes stories

    • @Dizek
      @Dizek Рік тому +27

      its like handcrafted bread vs factory made, you can buy a factory one on every corner store, but there is a reason bakery made has more value

    • @Lissbirds
      @Lissbirds Рік тому +14

      As someone with art as a persuit, yeah, it's so depressing. We are in the process of a race to the bottom with videos like this.

    • @micaholson7293
      @micaholson7293 Рік тому +9

      @@Golden504 I think the future is going to be ai pretty much. Soon we'll have ai robots flipping our hamburgers.

  • @LastNight0
    @LastNight0 Рік тому +71

    as an artist who has struggled to get clients this hurts.

    • @effortcivilengineersinteri3784
      @effortcivilengineersinteri3784 Рік тому +3

      Yeah same

    • @syafiqahasseggaf
      @syafiqahasseggaf Рік тому +6

      This video, this lady actually telling people to sell unethical art. Its so heart breaking that people who claimed to be "artist" sells money by contributing to a machine that constantly stealing an identity from a real artist.
      But fellow Real artist! Good news!
      Thankfully, recently there's a big movement on implementing a lawsuit against people like this.
      Go search : Protecting artist from AI Technologies by Concept Art Association
      This is a huge movement for us. 65k USD is already donated within 2 days. Its gonna be interesting to see how ironic this video will be

    • @Alexandraadftxr7052
      @Alexandraadftxr7052 Рік тому

      @@syafiqahasseggaf there has been someone who sayd that someone want's to make they portfolio by using an AI. I just sad.

    • @ProblematicRat
      @ProblematicRat Рік тому +1

      To me, the best thing about doing art is the process of it. Although making art takes a long time, it is soothing and the longer you work on it, the more meaning it gets. But now, people type stuff and it is all meaningless. Quite a shame if you ask me.

  • @kaamkic
    @kaamkic Рік тому +247

    As an artist, AI is terrifying to me lol.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +51

      I think AI Art will be an incredible tool in the future for artists to help speed up some of their work if they choose to use it. You can use it to generate parts of it, and then modify/expand it yourself 🌞

    • @kaamkic
      @kaamkic Рік тому +10

      @@WholesaleTed that’s true!

    • @kwaimin141
      @kwaimin141 Рік тому +8

      As an artist, AI makes me work faster

    • @chloevaillant9430
      @chloevaillant9430 Рік тому +22

      @@WholesaleTed Please look more into it before promoting such thing !

    • @geo-mic
      @geo-mic Рік тому +30

      photography was terrifying for painters at that time

  • @ArtVlog
    @ArtVlog Рік тому +54

    we already know how bad AI art is for artists but another point is that it's also lowering art prices like crazy. People don't understand how much it takes to create a true art piece: time, skills, materials, ideas etc and some people are already contrary to paying an artist what they actually should. Now, with AI art that people sell for 5$ a piece (because they didn't put any effort into it), it will become normal to spend that low for an art piece. it's crazy and very sad.

    • @PhilipXander
      @PhilipXander Рік тому +3

      AI generated art always has some degree of randomness in it. These processes won’t take anything away because demand for custom work or in general human inspiration will always be there, even when the two will get indistinguishable. The AI doesn’t know what is gonna generate, you will that’s the difference.
      At least bad artists that do degeneracy like furry will not get paid.

    • @user-uv8hp4jh7k
      @user-uv8hp4jh7k Рік тому +1

      Art is meaningless.

    • @cirnocandrive1254
      @cirnocandrive1254 Рік тому

      ​@@user-uv8hp4jh7kjust like your life 😢

  • @lenoralore
    @lenoralore Рік тому +188

    It takes me 8+ hours to paint an original work (from my own thought process without technology) not to mention the time to photograph it, frame it etc or seal it so it is ready for sale. Then I put it online and AI steals it based on a user generated search but changes a few things and there you have a 5 minute or less hack that makes the user millions and me nothing for the original.

    • @knight808.
      @knight808. Рік тому +25

      that’s not how it works 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @DGreen951
      @DGreen951 Рік тому +24

      That's not how it works. Plus you're nobody online. No AI or person is stealing your art style lol

    • @absence9443
      @absence9443 Рік тому +1

      The second half doesn't make sense.

    • @egg2628
      @egg2628 Рік тому +3

      Yea bro it's not how it works, until someone takes your artwork then upload it to img2img and call it theirs

    • @ruby9898
      @ruby9898 Рік тому

      I think technology needs to be updated and protect artists more by NFT codes.

  • @AquarianPsychonaut
    @AquarianPsychonaut Рік тому +263

    As much as I am astonished by this AI generated "art" or should I say pixels (I have to admit I had quite fun testing some promts), I believe we will slowly loose touch with or own human creativity/life force, if we are going down further this road. As many other people and especially artists wrote in the comments: these images are mixed and made out of the real talented minds, humans, people, maybe your friend or family relative who spend hours, if not even months or years, to channel and express the wonders of life into something that would impact and touch peoples hearts. By that we denial the credit & respect to those important individuals and what they do for our health and culture.
    To sell those 10sec generated "artworks" to people for ridiculously high prices seems more than morally reprehensible, even though it seems tempting in times, where we all have to pay increasingly large bills.
    Much respect & love to all the true artists out there 🙏🏻❤️

    • @kuroibuta
      @kuroibuta Рік тому +17

      People still respect the real thing and are willing to pay more to support creators. Usually an artist sells his/her work at high prices through reputation and marketing. That takes time and can't really be replicated. Basically art without a personality with it is going to get CHEAP because with these AI systems, the supply is about to skyrocket.

    • @justcurioushuman
      @justcurioushuman Рік тому +3

      RIP artists... Join me on the catwalk in the wharehouse... Before robots will get this job before you. LOl

    • @fluffyspaceshark
      @fluffyspaceshark Рік тому +9

      Personally I'd pay WAY more for an actual custom piece, like really good artists, specifically ones that draw furry art, make bank even with this out. So, IDK

    • @JoannaLero
      @JoannaLero Рік тому +27

      Beautifully said. I am a musician (we are also impacted by AI already) and what's happening with AI is worrisome. Even if we forget the business aspect of being an artist and making a living out of this, I am also thinking about ridding our lives of creativity and what impact it will have on us as a society. Imagine, soon to be born kids will not understand why they should spend hours getting good at something if they can generate everything online. Creativity and what we get thanks to the process is one of the best mental health meds!

    • @AquarianPsychonaut
      @AquarianPsychonaut Рік тому +11

      @@JoannaLero Thank you! :)
      Yes, I often imagine how the world must be for the new generation without any reference point to the old "analog".

  • @JMulvy
    @JMulvy Рік тому +252

    People might want to read the terms and services of the AI software they are using. Several of them reserve the copyright of what you create, others give you the copyright while reserving a sub-license. What that means is they get to use it however they want, you may not be allowed to sell them, and in the case of sub-licenses, they get to use it but you take responsibility for it. In the recent copyright argument and class action lawsuits, that may be a very bad thing.

    • @JMulvy
      @JMulvy Рік тому +39

      Also; if anyone is interested, I recently found out that as of several months ago the US Copyright Office will not issue copyright for AI generated images. There is no process for it in their files and it needs to be decided upon in Congress before they can issue one. So regardless of what the TOS says, you are creating product for the owners of these engines.

    • @davidbuffalo6821
      @davidbuffalo6821 Рік тому +13

      Read the articles I posted. I would have legal help behind me if I decided to do this. There will be lawsuits over this kind of business. Even Getty Images is refusing to use or sell them.

    • @alhla
      @alhla Рік тому +6

      There was a story on NBC news on 12/9/2022 about Lensa A.I. avatar art. They said the same thing about copyright concerns. And security concerns as well. A security expert said you could be compromised regarding your images being used for facial recognition. The news story video is on UA-cam.

    • @julychris2275
      @julychris2275 Рік тому +1

      @@JMulvy they already gave copyright to AI art

    • @dilldough991
      @dilldough991 Рік тому +38

      Dall e 2 is open source. I bet your doing this and trying to cut competition out by spreading fear good job but not valid

  • @miked4309
    @miked4309 Рік тому +11

    i struggle as an artist. i make about 2 or 3 dollars on a sale if i make one. hours upon hours of painting. now a stupid app makes pictures into digital art in seconds. LIKE IT WASNT HARD ENOUGH TO BE AN ARTIST.

    • @HokkaidoSan
      @HokkaidoSan Рік тому +3

      Many struggle as an artist, even myself when I first started. The phrase "Struggling Artist" has been here for centuries. Adapt or get left behind. Use AI to your benefit.

    • @miked4309
      @miked4309 Рік тому +1

      @@HokkaidoSan i do digital paintings...thats enough adapting for me, thanks.

  • @cosmiccircleswithlindavaro5062
    @cosmiccircleswithlindavaro5062 Рік тому +261

    The dark side of this is that I know many artists whose work is being swiped by Ai softwares in general, then using it produce a version of their work for other people. It's HORRIBLE. It's ruining the lives of well known artists because at this point they are powerless to do anything about it. Someone even had artwork swiped from her BOOK! IF you have a conscience at all, it's time to rethink this until these kinks are ironed out.

    • @stevenchitwood2146
      @stevenchitwood2146 Рік тому +46

      100% agree with this

    • @aaronbowersock
      @aaronbowersock Рік тому +32

      All ai art legally has no copyright, so anyone could just copy all listings from anyone using ai generated images. I hope predatory sellers get their listings copied

    • @missveronica8393
      @missveronica8393 Рік тому +13

      Unfortunately people have always stolen other people's work and tried to pass it off as their own. It doesn't matter if they are using ai or copying it manually on photoshop or procreate, it's the same thing, and it should be treated the same way. Plagiarism is plagiarism, no matter what the medium is.
      I saw a lot of people get procreate and decide to start business copying other people's work and photographs, and it's exactly the same thing as this, and it all needs to be treated in the same way, it's theft.

    • @SynthDrops
      @SynthDrops Рік тому +17

      AI is not the problem, people using it irresponsibly is. And that’s exactly what this person is influencing people to do imo. Very powerful and very useful tech but we must remind ourselves to be kind and not let pure greed be the sole driver of our decisions when using it.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +48

      There is a bizarre myth going around that DALL-E is "stitching together images" - it is not. It is generating them completely from scratch. They are original images, and it does it through this method: ua-cam.com/video/1CIpzeNxIhU/v-deo.html
      The myth seems to come from the fact that, especially earlier on in it's life, DALL-E would sometimes generate watermarks that looked similar to say, Shutterstock watermarks. That isn't because it was stitching together Shutterstock images. It's because it was mistaking that as being a normal part of the image. They made modifications to DALL-E to teach it that the watermark isn't part of the image.
      Despite that, this myth still exists, and people still state it as though it is true.

  • @maryewell7621
    @maryewell7621 Рік тому +1

    Thank you, that was a great video. I've been thinking about starting my own print on demand business.

  • @vickisotomayorleroy6147
    @vickisotomayorleroy6147 Рік тому +3

    Hello from Texas I have many Digital images that I have created over the last five years and been feeling kind of stuck in a rut not selling them or printing them,way too expensive! Thank you for explaining Dall-E I’m really excited to use it! Who knows what the future holds🇺🇸

  • @creativedesigns2946
    @creativedesigns2946 Рік тому +8

    I have a question! What do you mean when you say,
    ¿but do you retain the rights to use the artwork when necessary to maintain the operation of your services?

  • @beckyquint254
    @beckyquint254 Рік тому +3

    Thank you! I’ve followed you for a long time. Nervous about starting. I trust you though you’ve stayed the same! Thank you.

  • @litpapi1849
    @litpapi1849 Рік тому +2

    Sweet I just started doing this about a week ago!! Good to see I'm hopefully doing something right..

  • @jeffb8824
    @jeffb8824 Рік тому +6

    Excellent and inspirational video as always!
    Do you know if you are allowed to alter images, ie make collages out of Dall-e images?
    Thanks for all the great content!

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +1

      Yes you are! There is an example of someone doing that in this video: ua-cam.com/video/TYCNoN9OQww/v-deo.html

  • @docputer
    @docputer Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the always great info. I was watching while falling asleep last night, so I had to go back and grab the website links. Been having fun generating some pictures.

  • @brookebumbaugh5524
    @brookebumbaugh5524 Рік тому +2

    Thank you for this! I love your videos and the transparency you always give ❤️

  • @LearnRunes
    @LearnRunes Рік тому +3

    That was very useful for a reason completely different to what you probably intended it for. Thank you.

  • @capitalmoving10
    @capitalmoving10 Рік тому +7

    2 or 3 best performing etsy shops are not representative. I want to know how many are there TOTAL image shops on etsy and what are their average profits?

  • @Ai_Plus
    @Ai_Plus Рік тому +6

    Just found this channel yesterday, watched few videos, I just love her! She's so lovely, witty and funny! I understand her accent no problem, and I think that's a style for this channel! Keep sharing Girl!

  • @acupofhappy
    @acupofhappy Рік тому +3

    I just want to say THANK YOU for sharing all this info with us, in whatever accent your little, generous heart desires.... this grandmother gratefully takes as much of your advice as I possibly can manage. :) Much more success to you my dear.

  • @user-gm5lq6jt7t
    @user-gm5lq6jt7t Рік тому +15

    So now talentless people can make money from art they don't make.
    Phew, what a time to be alive

    • @ruthcadioli7403
      @ruthcadioli7403 Рік тому +6

      Yeap, by stealing - “it’s legal, just copy someone’s else’s SIGNATURE STYLE that you like”. Hahahaa
      Do people REALLY THINK THIS IS OK? 😮 Do people really think the artist whose work you’re copying is happy for you to do so? And you dont even need to ask for their permission?? Do you not think there are going to be repercussions down the line? USE YOUR OWN WORK, put in the hard yards and figure out your own unique style.

    • @AlexDSV
      @AlexDSV Рік тому +1

      use ai to your advantage or get left behind in the dark bitching about it it is your own choice

    • @ProblematicRat
      @ProblematicRat Рік тому

      Using ai does not exactly give off the same feeling as the traditional art does. I call it lazy and just trying to gain profit and profit.

  • @eliasrodriguez3238
    @eliasrodriguez3238 Рік тому

    Love this. Thank you! This makes me want to try print on demand again.

  • @freestyleodyssey
    @freestyleodyssey Рік тому +2

    Great inspirational video! I just opened a digital shop on Etsy but haven’t uploaded yet. Can I be successful just creating SVG or png files, or do I need to do both plus jpg, eps, dxf etc?

  • @allthingslostonearthoracle4055

    As an artist, I’m appalled by this 😢

  • @angelic8889
    @angelic8889 Рік тому +19

    With the number of views these videos get, this craft will be completely oversaturated in no time.

    • @andoncroft5154
      @andoncroft5154 Рік тому

      Not necessarily, there is a huge for AI art and many ppl out there who rather just buy them instead of making them. In time it will die down bt for now I have to disagree with you, I've seen certain accounts on various platforms and many are making over $5K a month from AI art alone 😊

    • @andoncroft5154
      @andoncroft5154 Рік тому

      Oh I forgot to say how BEAUTIFUL you are ❤️❤️❤️😁

    • @BizarreAsmrRelaxation
      @BizarreAsmrRelaxation Рік тому

      Most people don't actually try the suggestions thou.

  • @DIGOLOGIST
    @DIGOLOGIST Рік тому

    I have been taking notes on this video. Going to check out your print on demand video and download the free E- book. Thanks for another great video.

    • @DIGOLOGIST
      @DIGOLOGIST Рік тому

      @@whatapp-8178 Stay off her channel Scammer scumbag!

  • @MiLa-rz6ss
    @MiLa-rz6ss Рік тому

    Hello Sara, do you have a video where you explain if we need to officially registrate before to start selling by amazon fba, or print on demand or dropssipping? To start the courses you propose do I need already been registrated as entrepreneur? Thx in advance Sara

  • @plotagonroy7997
    @plotagonroy7997 Рік тому +3

    I just use them as patterns on other sites to sell and have done good with the geese ones, but mostly that is what I do with AI just turn them into patterns, or stickers on redbubble or even zazzle.

  • @moneyinmyroom9636
    @moneyinmyroom9636 Рік тому +5

    I tried Dall-e and sometimes it did alright and sometimes the art was so bad that I doubt anyone would buy it. I typed in Stegosaurus riding a skateboard and Dall-e generated a bunch of mutated weird dinosaur looking things with broken skateboards that looked like it was drawn by a 5 year old child. So even if it can generate images those will likely still have to be edited by an artist to look good.

  • @Nasauniverse001
    @Nasauniverse001 Рік тому +1

    OMG, Sara, marvellous, I think I have found something I can do. I have tried to find a passive income idea, and although it initially looks like I can cope, I do get overwhelmed and hit a wall. But this one combines my love or art with something I can do. This is marvellous, you are wonderful. Where do you find these things? Anyway, Im so glad you do. Cheers.

  • @leviteapparel
    @leviteapparel Рік тому

    I want to say I'm sorry I have taken your videos for granted even though they show every often I watch however this is genius you increase my potential potential higher than I can imagine we'll get started immediately on using this product. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!

  • @tommybucks541
    @tommybucks541 Рік тому +3

    Hi Sarah. Great video as always. Just one minor thing - how much of this is easily possible using the free accounts of things like Alura and Printify or the free credits available or ideally does one have to upgrade to a paid account of these services? Thank you from Auckland NZ.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +7

      Alura isn't free - it's also not required to start a store at all. I use Alura as part of my video to show profits, but you can just easily see what products are popular on Etsy for free, by seeing which products have lots of reviews, which you can check just by clicking around Etsy and browsing yourself.
      I discuss how to set up an Etsy Printify store for free in this video tutorial, I hope it can help you: ua-cam.com/video/7ZlZFPBWC74/v-deo.html

  • @lexnite22
    @lexnite22 Рік тому +3

    This is FANTASTIC!!! Definitely will use it for my p.o.d. store!

  • @Leo-pf3cd
    @Leo-pf3cd Рік тому +2

    Thank you very informative, one the best videos you have done, I have learnt a lot of useful information to help with my Ai, never heard of the Dal one will try.

    • @Leo-pf3cd
      @Leo-pf3cd Рік тому

      how do you remove the four square in the corner of the Ai photo if its in your image

  • @rikinosi
    @rikinosi Рік тому +1

    DALLE-2 ai tool places a watermark in every picture it creates. Are you legally alowed to remove the watermark and use the picture or do you need to keep the watermark there?

  • @melaniekehaya2868
    @melaniekehaya2868 Рік тому +5

    I messed around with Midjourney, haven’t tried Dalle2 yet. The problem is when people want to print them into say posters the art isn’t clear, it’s blurred. How do you get around this?

    • @tobydobo4080
      @tobydobo4080 Рік тому

      She covers this in the 3rd chapter. Ai photo enlarger software

    • @melaniekehaya2868
      @melaniekehaya2868 Рік тому

      @@tobydobo4080 thankyou I saw this but because it’s bigger the quality is then usually bad

  • @winkletter
    @winkletter Рік тому +89

    I'm glad you brought up the resolution issue. As well as upscaling with AI, it's possible to covert bitmaps to vector graphics with free tools like Inkscape. Ukiyo-e sometimes have gradients that don't work well with this technique, but for some images that are mostly solid colors, it works great.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +19

      That is a really great tip, thank you so much for sharing 🙏

    • @ralfschmidt8015
      @ralfschmidt8015 Рік тому +1

      thank you very much

  • @jacobsoriano8946
    @jacobsoriano8946 Рік тому

    I'm in love with your accent. thank you for the info and stay safe.

  • @muhammadaqibjaved4799
    @muhammadaqibjaved4799 Рік тому +2

    Really amazing and helpful as always ...Thanks for sharing

  • @Chazzvc
    @Chazzvc Рік тому +4

    This video is gonna trigger so many artist. It's not so much the ai is stealing from art itself, But the Ai learned from the art and now the ai is kicking the artist butts at their job and eating a large slice of the pie.
    It forces artist to create art in a non-creative way. I personally enjoy it but i'm not a "real artist". I can draw well and have lots of art skills but I'm not super attached to the process of making art. If I could press a button and get the image in my brain onto the canvas saving 100s of hours of time and energy I would love that. But I still respect that for some people, The act of making the art slowly is an art in itself.

  • @SWATxPolicy
    @SWATxPolicy Рік тому +7

    It’s only legal for now. And it shouldn’t be. Musicians must pay to legally use a sample from another song, but AI art using other artists pieces to articulate an artwork doesn’t require a contribution?
    It’s harder than ever to win against technology, and people who come up with how to monetize it think that justifies their greed.

    • @johnberry8133
      @johnberry8133 Рік тому

      I think it depends. Take the Japanese art style discussed here. How can a human artist learn the style without studying and to a degree copying the style of the old masters of the art? Who would the contribution be paid to when someone copies the style of Da Vinci?
      Even with a contemporary artist, if an art student sits for hours studying the style in a gallery are they required to pay the artist? I can see some interesting court cases possibly on the horizon though.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому

      I actually don't think there will be any court cases in the future in regards to that, because it's already been litigated & the courts have decided that art styles can't be copyrighted, so anyone can use any art style they like. Otherwise you can just imagine how many artists would be sued for painting in a Realism style! 😉 www.thelegalartist.com/blog/you-cant-copyright-style

  • @geekatari4391
    @geekatari4391 Рік тому +1

    I wanted to be a translator, but I tried to when apps already do most of the job. Now I see artists are going to be struggling in a few years. But hey! Don't feel bad, you guys are talented, gifted, and my zero creative skills will forever envy and appreciate your talent.

  • @stevebarnes-cx5qx
    @stevebarnes-cx5qx Рік тому +4

    found this on the t&c page od dall-e : Use for non-commercial purposes: As this is an experimental research platform, users are not allowed to use generated images for commercial purposes. For example, users may not license, sell, trade, or otherwise transact on these image generations in any form, including through related assets such as NFTs. Users also may not serve these image generations to others through a web application or through other means of third-parties initiating a request.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +3

      People keep quoting that page - it's outdated & poorly written. DALL-E have clarified recently many times, including this week that you can use the images for commercial purposes. This is their LATEST update to their FAQ on the matter: help.openai.com/en/articles/6468065-dall-e-content-policy-faq
      "Can I use DALL·E for commercial uses, including NFTs and freelancing? - Yes."
      "Can I sell DALL·E generations I created during the research preview?" - Yes."
      "Can I remove the watermark? - Yes."

    • @Top10TipsforSportsBetting
      @Top10TipsforSportsBetting 14 днів тому

      Can we use DALLE for affiliate marketing?

  • @JonBaran
    @JonBaran Рік тому +4

    Thanks for all your great advice! As an artist and print on demand designer I'm very excited about this new frontier of AI art!

  • @alternativestate4237
    @alternativestate4237 Рік тому +3

    I always come away from your videos completely gob-smacked... You are so inspiring!

  • @Mandyglee22
    @Mandyglee22 Рік тому +1

    THIS IS AN AMAZING FIND!!!!!!!!!! CAN NOT THANK YOU ENOUGH FOR REVEALING THIS TECHNIQUE, this is gonna help soooo much. :)

  • @fehrmendez4881
    @fehrmendez4881 Рік тому +50

    "Great I no longer have to pay the person that actually put their time and effort learning how to and then creating art for me. I just type words and I can take away their money" awese video...

    • @emily00firebomb
      @emily00firebomb Рік тому +25

      My thoughts exactly. Especially since this program doesn’t create “new” art. It pieces together existing art which is why you see a watermark or signature from time to time. Sad. However, Shutterstock partnered with DALLE to ethically create AI art via the Shutterstock website where artists will get paid. Ethical AI option.

    • @thomasknight-wagener6630
      @thomasknight-wagener6630 Рік тому

      so you're telling me that if i spend all day making ai art and adapting prompts, that i put no effort into making the art? you're fkn ignorant and retarded to say such things...

    • @jennyheidewald5006
      @jennyheidewald5006 Рік тому

      @@emily00firebomb I hadn't heard those two partnered together, that is good. I have no issue with AI being trained on images that are ethically sourced and artists/contributors get paid, that is the way they ALL should have been trained.

    • @AlexDSV
      @AlexDSV Рік тому +1

      im just saying if your not gona be able to deal with ai and robots i feel bad for you because every year more and more ai and more stuff will get replaced

  • @CyberTechJordan
    @CyberTechJordan Рік тому +6

    when using Dall-E, do you include the watermark on the lower right corner when you sell?

    • @ashen_kills
      @ashen_kills Рік тому +1

      Yes, then you sell it on your shopify site with only $5 in FB ad`s and make 40k p/m, understand?

    • @generalzucc462
      @generalzucc462 Рік тому +9

      You're allowed to remove the watermark, ignore the person above.

    • @redballoonstickers
      @redballoonstickers Рік тому +1

      crop it out

    • @morrisalanisette9067
      @morrisalanisette9067 Рік тому +2

      us AI to remove to watermark lol

    • @lblack_sugarl1213
      @lblack_sugarl1213 Рік тому

      the AI images are not protected by copyright.

  • @nmck2687
    @nmck2687 Рік тому

    I have yet to find a more informative You Tuber on the whole of You Tube than you. You content is amazing and the detail you go into is beyond helpful. Thank you so much xx

  • @22bseano
    @22bseano Рік тому

    When does this channel become Wholesale Sarah and not Wholesale Ted?? 😁😁 thank you Sarah. Helping to change lives. I only have time to catch up to what you find out there so it's great for motivation to check in and see what's next! G'day from over the ditch.

  • @erastal
    @erastal Рік тому +6

    you know artist don’t even make that much money normally right? What make you think some congeal shit from an AI will net you passive income?

  • @jitendraarora2878
    @jitendraarora2878 Рік тому +3

    Hi Teddy!
    Your videos are inspiring!

  • @jagomastic
    @jagomastic Рік тому +1

    This woman is an absolute BEAST! You rock Sarah🤘

  • @stargazeronesixseven
    @stargazeronesixseven Рік тому +1

    Thank You So Much Sarah for the illumination! 🐕

  • @stereoscope360v6
    @stereoscope360v6 Рік тому +81

    Imagine an artist who spends tens of thousands of hours practicing and developing a unique style only to have someone start making pictures by the second, potentially millions of variations that all look like the artist's work, and the artist inadvertently creates works in their own style but looks too much like works in the vast database of copies in the AI "Artist's" hard drive and gets sued by the AI "artist" for infringing on their intellectual property because the artist made something that wasn't transformative enough and it looks just like AI "artist's" work because it was made in the style of the original artist.

    • @daniellepaxton7427
      @daniellepaxton7427 Рік тому +6

      Yeah, it's not like AI creates original artwork really. It just sees what is already out there from images on the web and from other "real" artists works and then reconfigures it. This is NOT real art. It is more like theft if it is taking images from sources that are not open source or offered as free images.

    • @cholou1
      @cholou1 Рік тому

      Its not that easy really lol theres skill needed when it comes to prompt

    • @WeShareTheSameAffliction
      @WeShareTheSameAffliction Рік тому +1

      Eh, that's their bad for choosing that profession. Technology is just gonna keep getting better and better. 🤷🏾‍♀️

    • @biocykle
      @biocykle Рік тому +4

      @@cholou1 It's about a million times easier than becoming a skillful artist and developing your own style

    • @michaelr3578
      @michaelr3578 Рік тому +1

      Original artist needs to date the art through notary if physical image, or creating a web page with the digital image, artist information, then post in several archive websites for date purposes. All AI art is datestamped, so the original artist's date of archival proves beyond a doubt who is the originator.

  • @christiandad5920
    @christiandad5920 Рік тому +4

    180k etsy accounts just started after this video lol. There won't be any one to buy the art, just people selling. 😂

    • @jennyheidewald5006
      @jennyheidewald5006 Рік тому +2

      Yeah, why would anyone buy someone elses stuff if they can just have an AI make it themselves? Etsy used be be a good place to support real artists.

  • @mahalicious2512
    @mahalicious2512 Рік тому +2

    Hii, I am your new subscriber and very happy that i found you 💫

  • @Franzflowerz
    @Franzflowerz Рік тому

    Hello! Thanks for the info! As I was looking for images, I noticed colorful little squares at the bottom right corners..For that bottom colorful watermark, would we just have to crop that out?

  • @andrewdowniephd
    @andrewdowniephd Рік тому +2

    I need to give this a try. Watched a number of your videos but still to actually take the leap and start a p-o-d business.

  • @keiphyn
    @keiphyn Рік тому +6

    If you have an Etsy store that does things like t-shirts and clothes, do you recommend setting up a different shop for things like digital downloads and more graphic art? Or just put it all together?

    • @pllo7488
      @pllo7488 Рік тому

      It depends on the concept of your shop. As in what your shop is about if it's tailored to different types of things available in one place. Or one thing specifically.

  • @henridusasca8077
    @henridusasca8077 Рік тому

    Hello Sarah,
    Is your online courses are updated with the last information on the market? Or its still the same since the creation?
    Thanks

  • @RnbfPw
    @RnbfPw Рік тому +1

    could you do a step by step on how to set one of these shops up thanks

  • @melaniedawn4256
    @melaniedawn4256 Рік тому +3

    I really appreciate the content you share. I never would have thought to check into AI artist/graphic programs. Thank you

    • @Alexandraadftxr7052
      @Alexandraadftxr7052 Рік тому +5

      I can give you a better, more ethical, and fullfiling advice. It's leran to draw.

  • @mikeogden1243
    @mikeogden1243 Рік тому +5

    I'm glad you included a video for us eComm Clubhouse members. This looks like another great income stream. So many possibilities. I signed up for your course a couple weeks ago. I'm having a lot of fun setting up a Shopify store. Still waiting for a few designs to come back from Fivver. But I am progressing along nicely. Thanks, Sarah for your videos.

  • @brgtechdev
    @brgtechdev Рік тому +4

    You really are the best. Thanks for making this, I've got a little bit of hope today that I'll be able to get something selling!

  • @SuperFairymagic
    @SuperFairymagic Рік тому

    Thank you so much, Sarah!
    You accent is lovely

  • @roshanaariel
    @roshanaariel Рік тому +2

    Just wondering, how much marketing do those top shops do to get people to come to their shops and see what they have? Seems to me, that's the hardest part, yeah?

  • @jamestreible4545
    @jamestreible4545 Рік тому +22

    Thank you for this information. I am really excited about the possibility this offers.
    I am, however, confused about the rights to use the generated content for commercial products. You say that the user is given full rights to use the images however they like, including commercial use. But when looking over the info on their site I found the following paragraph, and it leaves me wondering if one really is allowed too use the output for commercial use
    Under "Additional policies":
    Use for non-commercial purposes: As this is an experimental research platform, users are not allowed to use generated images for commercial purposes. For example, users may not license, sell, trade, or otherwise transact on these image generations in any form, including through related assets such as NFTs. Users also may not serve these image generations to others through a web application or through other means of third-parties initiating a request.
    Does anyone have additional comments that may help clarify this?

    • @Una_Singh
      @Una_Singh Рік тому +6

      Seems pretty clear to me 😁 It's not legal..

    • @zigzag2370
      @zigzag2370 Рік тому +1

      Gotta take into consideration that things legal in one country may or may not be legal in new Zealand

    • @Lik3ToSing
      @Lik3ToSing Рік тому +1

      I’m glad you posted this info for awareness

    • @LisaSulingMaslin
      @LisaSulingMaslin Рік тому

      This video is useless then

  • @allaganqueen
    @allaganqueen Рік тому +14

    Or just, you know, pay a living artist a flat fee to license work for printing to compensate them for their time and skill, instead of giving text prompts to a bot who stole the art from those artists anyway.

    • @lanadelrussy531
      @lanadelrussy531 Рік тому +8

      ^ THIS. Recommending everyone use this poorly-generated AI art INSTEAD of supporting local artists is major cringe.

    • @ruthcadioli7403
      @ruthcadioli7403 Рік тому +4

      Let’s call it what it is: IP theft. ‘Their’ work is not possible without the style cue from the stolen without permission artwork. After all, what is it that artists strive for? A RECOGNISABLE AND UNIQUE STYLE of their own. It can take years to develop this.
      To those thinking of using AI: USE YOUR OWN DRAWINGS, DONT STEAL THE USE OF OTHERS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому

      Just to clarify, a "signature art style" is not protected by copyrights and is not a form of intellectual property. Anyone is allowed to draw/paint etc in any "style" that they want: www.thelegalartist.com/blog/you-cant-copyright-style
      If "styles" were copyrighted, it would mean then that many forms of art could not exist. For example, all artists who wish to paint in a realism style now could not, for only one person would ever be allowed to do that, which would make no sense.
      Everyone, including AI, is allowed to draw in any "style" that they want - there is no copyright protection and it is not an IP.

  • @joyfuljourney6854
    @joyfuljourney6854 Рік тому

    Wow!!! So exciting!
    Thank you❤️
    Jen

  • @desliegilson
    @desliegilson Рік тому

    Thank you so much for sharing your info.

  • @Ryu62Alpha
    @Ryu62Alpha Рік тому +38

    Regardless of how these AI generate images, it is very plain to see the market is quickly becoming saturated with people imitating the work of artists.
    Art is more than just an end product for many artists, it's a thing that we do. Its a process that is cultivated, practiced, learned, and slowly crafted after countless hours to develop a visual language. The way the vast majority of artists learn is the same way AI does, but humans are learning the visual vocabulary and creating their own voice. To communcate visually. Style is a difficult thing to quantify or even articulate how deeply personal it is to most people. It's a continuously evolving the process of creating each sketch, painting, or photo, that accumulates emotional weight. So when artists share these pieces, they are sharing a very intimate part of themselves.
    Style is an artist's voice.
    Style can't be copyrighted, but that doesn't make the act of mimicking them with AI any less disturbing.
    AI generators are an amazing technology, but encouraging people to use it to make money like this is giving the green light to bad actors to profit off of someone else's voice. Right now, artists are being harrasses by images that are a warped reflection of the years they have dedicated to crafting a very real part of who they are. It doesn't just diminish their work in terms of monotary value, but also as people. Art isn't just something we want to sell, but a piece of ourselves we a share with others.

    • @BearBrave-wk3sy
      @BearBrave-wk3sy Рік тому +3

      Minh P, the way you and many artists describe how you communicate deeply personal feelings through your art is frankly (laughable) a waste of your talents because viewers of your art aren't going to appreciate or 'feel' any of that. People look at art and extrapolate their own reactions from it. You're better off writing to express yourself to be heard. Frankly, your type of artists are (in your own dream world) wasting your time. No one viewing your art cares about the intimate parts of you and whether you got them in. For God's sake, does your art have hidden messages and weirdness that we have to 'get'? It's pictures. Just pictures. AI is just another tool, albeit an amazing tool that creates art out of an idea. Pretty much like you do. You get an idea. The AI gets its idea, it's called a prompt. And creates art. As for copying all the art works in existence. Well, aren't all artists inspired by the art they've looked at. A bit this person's style, a bit of that style, Oh I like how she does skies. And the only thing, at this early stage missing from the AI is the ability to come up with its own style, which is what humans do. But maybe that's the next 'thing' - you get the AI to create a scene that is inspired by six different artists to conjure up something original! Oh, and Wholesale Ted is one of the best communicators on UA-cam, so the haters can stop it. She's lovely.

    • @scribdfukkyu9630
      @scribdfukkyu9630 Рік тому +8

      @@BearBrave-wk3sy You can say that about anything that interests people,
      people who like wine and enjoying the tasting process? who cares its just alcohol
      people who like sports and watching it? who cares its just rich people running with a ball
      people who like video games? who cares its just a bunch of pixels
      people who like music? who cares its just noise
      people who like art? who cares its just pictures
      YOU may not care but people who like art care. Imagine devoting your life in studying art just to be ripped off by an AI. They aren't appreciated as we speak let alone when the AI becomes the norm.
      Now I understand if you are talking about the people that put 2 dots on a huge canvas and call it art, thats bs.
      Have a nice day.

    • @bluesailormercury
      @bluesailormercury Рік тому

      How are artists being harrassed? Are people making art similar to theirs and sending it to them, to taunt them?

    • @TheGoat_LionelMessi
      @TheGoat_LionelMessi Рік тому

      I was in my art nutshell when I get the AI news. My heart is weeping but imiginatly I reminded of the era when these Adobe software's or coral draw like software's harasses the true artists and are the actual reason why people are print addict they don't have soul to feel original art.

  • @phelper4554
    @phelper4554 Рік тому +7

    Think about the fact that she makes a video about making money instead of making the ai art for herself and then sell it. Now ask yourself how does she make more money? With UA-cam or with selling ai art?

    • @TINJ_
      @TINJ_ Рік тому +4

      That's what most of these videos/books/articles are doing. They're telling you 'free/easy money', but they're making their money off ads from the video/book/article.
      Why would people pay for this AI art junk when they can make it themselves just as easily? Maybe someone who doesn't know about AI, but that won't be something that lasts long.

  • @1flatabs
    @1flatabs Рік тому +1

    Thank you for the yet another amazing video. How do you get rid of the watermark on the platform? If you pay, does the watermark go away?

    • @1flatabs
      @1flatabs Рік тому

      Well, I figured out an easy solution. Didn't even need to use AI to find it.

  • @pixelizedneko
    @pixelizedneko Рік тому

    Woahh...this is a true gem! Thanks a bunch, Sarah! 😍

  • @yammykotchakorn9207
    @yammykotchakorn9207 Рік тому +4

    Thank you for sharing this valuable content. It's inspired me to build my own brand soon! Luv your content so so much 💕❤️

  • @zzurmzp
    @zzurmzp Рік тому +4

    I can bet that professionals who invested huge amount of time on their stock portfolios on shutter* for example, are just delighted with this new possibility. Maybe it is free but it's not moral. Thanks for the interesting video, tho!

  • @hassanyoucandoit1710
    @hassanyoucandoit1710 Рік тому

    Thank you so much for the information. Great content as always. I had been watching your videos

  • @adrianb4638
    @adrianb4638 11 місяців тому +1

    You are so awesome for all the content and value you provide. Thank you

  • @tcp_md
    @tcp_md Рік тому +6

    Sarah, what about the copyrights of the original images that AI used as "inspiration" or to compose part of the newly created picture? How can I legally sell my creation if Dall-E used pieces of other copyrighted images to make it?

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +4

      That's a myth a lot of people say: that DALL-E uses parts of other images to make new images. It's not true: it generates them entirely from scratch each time, just like if a human were to create an image pixel-by-pixel within photoshop. Except DALL-E is a computer, so it can do that within seconds.

    • @hnjk588
      @hnjk588 Рік тому +7

      @@WholesaleTed this might not be as true as you think - while it is true that the AI generators don’t use *parts* of existing images, what may be happening is that the AI is generating images that look waaaay too close to other existing images - e.g., some have found that prompting Midjourney for “afghan girl” brings up images that, though inexactly, very closely resemble Steve McCurry’s 1984 image “Afghan Girl” - more than close enough for a successful lawsuit if one of these generated images were to be used commercially without permission. This is “overfitting”, and it is likely that this happens way more than we currently are aware of with these AI generators.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +4

      The original comment I was replying to was about whether DALL-E uses "pieces" or pre-existing artwork to create images. That is a myth, they don't. It is uniquely generated pixel by pixel each time. Your comment regarding the fact that DALL-E can generate pictures similar to others is true: it can due to machine learning. Not because it's using pieces of the picture, but by the nature of AI trying to use it's knowledge bank to generate an image. It's very rare but indeed possible. That is part of their TOS/disclosure statement you have to agree too. I actually included it in this video too. Luckily though it's extremely easy to check if DALL-E has done this with any image before you use it though. You can just put the image in a Reverse Image Search Engine & see if it triggers anything 🙏

    • @jaycollier8632
      @jaycollier8632 Рік тому +6

      Dall-E utilises another OpenAI model called CLIP which is trained on caption and image pairs collected/scraped from the Internet. Whilst Dall-E does generate images, I would not class this as "from scratch" - I have a paid subscription and have seen Dall-E generate images with corrupted portions of artist's signatures or other watermarks present and Dall-E is not the only AI generator guilty of this.

    • @withak7683
      @withak7683 Рік тому

      I don't believe in the TOS you can ask for a famous or known person to use as your base. I might be wrong because I'm trying Midjourney and a couple others, but they tell you not to use such a person, the Mona Lisa would be fine, but not say Elvis.

  • @openyoureyes4799
    @openyoureyes4799 Рік тому +6

    As always Sarah, you are amazing and that's why I stay joined to your monthly payment for the web builder info. Thanks so much, Kathryn

  • @robertcummings5266
    @robertcummings5266 Рік тому

    WOW! Thanks for the awesome video. Do you know of any sites that have public-domain artwork that can be used to create items for resale purposes?

  • @HalkerVeil
    @HalkerVeil Рік тому +109

    The lawsuits against AI are going to be interesting because they scrape images that are under copyright for learning on the algorithm.
    Which then is passed on to the user of AI as the copyright infringement.
    But proving it is another thing.
    And then there is the fact that AI datasets can be trained on your own artwork.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +43

      Have you heard of "Fair Use"? Just because images are copyrighted, doesn't mean they can't be used for legal purposes that meet Fair Use. Using images to train an AI is very clearly Fair Use, as it is a transformative purpose. To learn more about Fair Use, and why it is so important, I recommend reading the Wikipedia page: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

    • @hnjk588
      @hnjk588 Рік тому +69

      @@WholesaleTed "transformative" as you (and I, and the rest of us humans mean in ordinary, everyday speech) doesn't mean what "transformative" does in fair use-copyright-legalese - works (i'll call this one new) can only get away with using other unauthorized copyrighted works (and this one old, so i don't repeat "unauthorized" too many times more) when the new work is used in such a way that it doesn't infringe upon the old work's copyright - i.e., cannot be argued to financially damage the old work. i think we'd be pretty hard pressed to say that AI art would not financially damage the artists whose copyrighted work it was trained upon.
      you could (and many do) argue that every artist already does "financially damage" the work they trained themselves upon - but here's the thing: _(traditional) artists do not use -- literally use -- the actual existing images to make new works._ this probably sounds both obvious and incorrect, but that's the distinction here that i don't think we have an English word for - while artists 'use' images (among many other things - reference is probably a better word) to create new images, the AI *_needs_*_ to use -- to be trained upon -- existing images to create new images_ - and the usage of these images - the .jpegs, the .pngs, the literal 1s and 0s, the data that composes these images - is where the infringement comes in. assuming the American iteration, copyright law protects "the tangible form of expression" of works - and what else does AI use but these tangible forms?
      it absolutely can be argued that AI works get exemption due to the third point of fair use - the "amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole" (from copyright.gov again) of the original works in the AI generated image, and that's where the law has yet to catch up due to the tech being so new (even ignoring the fact that the AI art literally had to use existing work to produce a new image). however, i can definitely find a lawyer or three who can argue that the second and fourth points ("nature of the copyrighted work" and "effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work" (from copyright.gov once again) are enough to strike an AI generated work - though by here and beyond, it becomes more of an argument about the spirit of the law than the letter, and there's a reason why i'm not in law school.

    • @WholesaleTed
      @WholesaleTed  Рік тому +20

      Financially damaging an artist has nothing to do with whether something constitutes as Fair Use or not. I could use someone's art to critique them and damage their reputation as a result, causing them to lose money. I can also infringe on their copyrights without financially damaging them. It's not a requirement for or against Fair Use, so the truth is, I'm not quite sure why you're mentioning it. It currently constitutes as Fair Use.

    • @mv1988
      @mv1988 Рік тому +78

      @@WholesaleTed Are you saying that as long as it is "fair use", and it is not, it does not matter if the artist gets financially damaged?
      As an old follower, how can you say that? Or you really do not care about it and see it as such?

    • @mv1988
      @mv1988 Рік тому +22

      You said it on your video, you dont need to buy nothing from them ever again, zero dollars, because somebody is already damaging them.

  • @formulaone07
    @formulaone07 Рік тому +73

    Regarding Etsy, way before AI art came on the scene, it was not allowed to sell "one click" art that could be produced by Photoshop actions for example. The shop owner had to have some kind of creative process. So why do you think Etsy will allow AI work to be sold?

    • @FrozenGm832
      @FrozenGm832 Рік тому +12

      How would they know?

    • @Lissbirds
      @Lissbirds Рік тому +32

      Etsy's full of drop shippers and people flipping cheap stuff from Aliexpress. They don't care, sadly, because it's srill revenue. This is just another example of low effort, non-handmade goods on Etsy.

    • @SunnyGirlFlorida
      @SunnyGirlFlorida Рік тому +17

      They do allow A.I. art and even have a category for it.

    • @excelsior8682
      @excelsior8682 Рік тому +7

      @@Lissbirds In other words, more opportunities to make money

    • @Alexandraadftxr7052
      @Alexandraadftxr7052 Рік тому

      @@SunnyGirlFlorida it's a shame.

  • @iAbrahamMohammed
    @iAbrahamMohammed Рік тому

    Awesome!! Love your work. That's one of the most honest videos I have seen.

  • @mompreneurlife
    @mompreneurlife Рік тому +1

    Thanks for sharing. Love your accent

  • @regotcha
    @regotcha Рік тому +74

    This is great, but it doesn't fulfil the video's title; it doesn't show us HOW to get $300 per day. It doesn't even suggest that Sarah generated $300. Also, Sarah said you can make MORE profit by using the images on Print On Demand. Well, Print On Demand has very low profit margins. Most of people's high dollar amounts are revenue. After all costs and fees, it could even be $0 or negative. Potentially. Other than that, a well presented video. 😁

    • @Ryo8761
      @Ryo8761 Рік тому +14

      It's same style of videos, " you could potentially earn X by doing this..."
      But no real actionable steps to take as the variables are too great. It's the money formula of taking about earning money and not actually earning the money for said method. Rinse and repeat.

    • @CrimsonCrystalRoses
      @CrimsonCrystalRoses Рік тому +6

      $ 300 per year is more realistic! I earn 30 $ per month with 10,000 pictures online! if you don't pay to promote your products nobody will see them

    • @chaddsteinberg3758
      @chaddsteinberg3758 Рік тому +2

      @@CrimsonCrystalRosesplease explain..you do what she explained? You Post printable images on Etsy and Shopify?

  • @henrywilkes6399
    @henrywilkes6399 Рік тому +3

    What tool are you using for ecom research? How are you able to see which products are most popular so quickly?

  • @IntrovertedAffiliate
    @IntrovertedAffiliate Рік тому

    A lot of times Dall-e will generate a picture that looks okay but it part of the object will be cut off like. Or often it will generate things that are totally random and don't make sense. Sometimes it can make decent things though.

  • @AliceLee333
    @AliceLee333 Рік тому

    @WholesaleTed..So does this allow a digital artist to include their signature on an AI creation if the piece is their own original idea, not a copy of some other painting or piece of art?

  • @channelmix3599
    @channelmix3599 Рік тому +2

    Thank you very much

  • @AIartBonaza
    @AIartBonaza Рік тому +9

    AI Art is a combination of Radom people’s art scrapped of the internet combined or melded to make new art. But really it is stealing please people support real artist.

  • @hogiebb1
    @hogiebb1 Рік тому +1

    I tried the Dalle-2 and u may have to make multiple attempts to get the right asthetic for one image. Not all images will hit the right note with color and balance and that spark of brilliance that a human artist can. I found when trying to do a Ukiyo-e, and even using specific artists like Hokusai, that the A.I. would dumb down animals like deer and squirrel and cat..rendering them cartoonish, even after multiple attempts with specific wording. I managed out of 15 tokens to get one possibly usable picture of a crane in front of Mt. Fugi. But I would much rather sell a print of an antique then pass my a.i. crane off as a true blockprint.
    Dalle-2I. seems to be good for futuristic, anime, cgi. It takes shortcuts and slaps the paintstrokes on. It's strength is that it's fast, but it's drawback is it lacks ability for nuances, and detail and harmony.

  • @KellyPKramer
    @KellyPKramer Рік тому

    In the ai image enlarger, what size would I need if I was putting the image on t-shirts?
    Thanks! Love your channel!

  • @JLOwens222
    @JLOwens222 Рік тому +9

    Thank you Sarah for another genius video! You are so helpful! 😊

  • @josuesanchez1
    @josuesanchez1 Рік тому +3

    1st comment!
    Always love to see a new video sarah!
    I want dancing videos again! 😅