If you admit to that before you sign the deal you won't get a deal. You already told them what they need to know and now they can link you. Your attorney is a witness because attorney client privilege only exist when there is an expectation of privacy.
@@damionmccoy9966 (sigh) the response would come from the attorney, not a statement of fact from the client. You argue semantics for no reason. That’s weird man.
@@brendan7704 Except when they’re irrelevant to the clients guilt because the client isn’t making a statement, his attorney is. Like in this case. They are not nearly as irrelevant as your comment though which is also pedantic and annoying. If you were trying to sound smart you failed, as it just sounds like you weren’t smart enough to follow the discussion properly and tried to ham fist in an irrelevant factoid.
Don’t take the bait. Instead of a panic button, they should make a have my assistant book a medical appointment in 30 minutes. That way you have legitimate excuse to leave.
These clips are auto generated and uploaded so the youtuber can make money off em for almost no effort. They are auto segmented to fit in the shorts category and rarely capture a whole scene properly and almost always leave off the name of the show. The real douches would be the youtubers uploading auto generated auto segmented crappy clips.
A question objected to as being irrelevant must still be answered in a deposition. Later, a judge may decide if the jury hears the answer. If such a question is not answered, the judge may order sanctions, such as ordering a further deposition with attorney fees paid directly by the offending attorney.
1: It is an interview or questioning, not a deposition. 2: No, the side wanting the answer can take the refusal to answer to a judge, and after a hearing with both sides, the judge can rule on relevance and if it is, then order that the question(s) be answered.
@@Mustangofold Although we cannot tell from the clip whether it is an interview/questioning versus a deposition, your second point assumes it is a deposition; if it is merely an interview or questioning, the client has no obligation to answer, and the judge would have no jurisdiction. Instead of "2. No ... I think you meant "2. Yes..." And it does not have to be a hearing. It can be decided by "paper" motion and reply.
“Not a bribe - extortion, which is why you will give me immunity.” Is the only correct response
Facilitating payment.
If you admit to that before you sign the deal you won't get a deal. You already told them what they need to know and now they can link you. Your attorney is a witness because attorney client privilege only exist when there is an expectation of privacy.
@@damionmccoy9966 (sigh) the response would come from the attorney, not a statement of fact from the client. You argue semantics for no reason. That’s weird man.
Semantics matter in law, it matters
@@brendan7704 Except when they’re irrelevant to the clients guilt because the client isn’t making a statement, his attorney is. Like in this case.
They are not nearly as irrelevant as your comment though which is also pedantic and annoying. If you were trying to sound smart you failed, as it just sounds like you weren’t smart enough to follow the discussion properly and tried to ham fist in an irrelevant factoid.
"In your world, not in this one" i love that line
This guy’s character was a major thorn in the side of Axe AND Chuck at different times but was eventually reeled in if I remember correctly…
All 3 are great actors in this. The investigating prosecutor is slight and skinny but like a cat like the terminator in T2.
Which show?
Hey, that’s the yellow king, carcossa
And George Ramus who read the vulstead act very carefully.
What movie/show is this?
Billions
It's literally in the channel name
that’s captain fucking winters
Major Winters
@@michiganrailfan2141 Winters gave the Nazis the Axe
Show name?
Don’t take the bait. Instead of a panic button, they should make a have my assistant book a medical appointment in 30 minutes. That way you have legitimate excuse to leave.
Remis doesn't give bribes 😂
LOVE IT!!
Herr Flick of the Gestapo has aged rather well...
So Mr. Axelrod, where is the Fallen Madonna with ze big boobies?
*immunity not community
Great catch
Are you aware that my eyebrows were found guilty of bribery?
Band of brothers
Whats the interrogators name?
All these Billions clips... Where's Mafee?🤨
Dannnnnny Sodessssss!
Damien getting only 6 is criminal.
This guy comimg after Bobby was in Charlie Wilson's war.
Name?
Did he burn him ?
No, Axe don't say anything
Immunity not Community.... who's in charge of the subtitles??
Seriously these are worse than the stupid impact font nonsense.
Glamorizing nihilistic materialism is lame.
They did not - they showed how shallow the world was. How lonely Axe became and the toll it took on everyone trying to climb the greasy pole
What in the AI is this caption?
it was hard to root for either Axelrod or Chuck Rhoades he is even worse
Reemis doesn't like all this nickel and dimeing
😂😂😂😂😂
Interesting.
AHHH CARCOSSA
reemis shuns irrelevant questions
A clear name of the movie or series would’ve deserved a like and a possible subscribe
Billions
These clips are auto generated and uploaded so the youtuber can make money off em for almost no effort. They are auto segmented to fit in the shorts category and rarely capture a whole scene properly and almost always leave off the name of the show. The real douches would be the youtubers uploading auto generated auto segmented crappy clips.
I’m with you.
Blocked the channel
Put that in your algorithm and smoke it
Guys the show name is in the channel name but sure find something to cry about.
Burn!@@Frickmook
A question objected to as being irrelevant must still be answered in a deposition. Later, a judge may decide if the jury hears the answer.
If such a question is not answered, the judge may order sanctions, such as ordering a further deposition with attorney fees paid directly by the offending attorney.
1: It is an interview or questioning, not a deposition.
2: No, the side wanting the answer can take the refusal to answer to a judge, and after a hearing with both sides, the judge can rule on relevance and if it is, then order that the question(s) be answered.
@@Mustangofold
Although we cannot tell from the clip whether it is an interview/questioning versus a deposition, your second point assumes it is a deposition; if it is merely an interview or questioning, the client has no obligation to answer, and the judge would have no jurisdiction.
Instead of "2. No ... I think you meant "2. Yes..." And it does not have to be a hearing. It can be decided by "paper" motion and reply.