[Hearthstone] Prince Taldaram N'Zoth Shaman (Part 2)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @JokerB94
    @JokerB94 7 років тому +13

    huge shout outs to your deckbuilding! its really a pleasure watching ur creativity and knowledge with synergies in this game

  • @Heltonheta
    @Heltonheta 7 років тому

    You really deserve more viewers. Awesome deckbuildings and good commentary during the plays.

  • @cosmodash6360
    @cosmodash6360 7 років тому +3

    You are the architect of the hidden ladder. People should play these decks, these ones who make the game funny and all cards actually useful, not that expensive cancer we meet so often nowadays.

    • @Begeru
      @Begeru 7 років тому +1

      this deck is kinda expensive though

  • @jollaby1241
    @jollaby1241 7 років тому +13

    of all the decks this expansion, which one has been the most fun for you to play?

  • @etherealg3940
    @etherealg3940 7 років тому

    So lovely to see a Control Shaman wrecking Priest. Reminds me of my adventures in Wild during MSOG and Un'Goro. Only with less Kel'Thuzads. :P

  • @Begeru
    @Begeru 7 років тому +5

    Damn ZERO respect for Exodia Mage. I like it :)

  • @melficecoe
    @melficecoe 7 років тому +5

    I love seeing Raza Priests getting rekt hard on the ladder!!!

  • @victorfernandez7516
    @victorfernandez7516 7 років тому +1

    Chump, any plans to stream in the near future?

  • @Nedmarx
    @Nedmarx 7 років тому +2

    With so much overload why did you remove the Snowfury Giants?

  • @O-Negative
    @O-Negative 7 років тому

    Dude I enjoy your decks. Just wish I had the dust to craft the cards you have.

  • @chumperinoskipperino3511
    @chumperinoskipperino3511 7 років тому +21

    0:01

  • @castellanosalondra2432
    @castellanosalondra2432 7 років тому

    This deck kicks ass

  • @natebelanger2280
    @natebelanger2280 7 років тому +1

    I havent seen Taldaram one time

  • @fydorm
    @fydorm 7 років тому +3

    hey man I'm here if you need to talk to somebody

  • @0equals1ao
    @0equals1ao 7 років тому

    Leave it up to Chump to find viable methods of play for the least played card in any expansion.

  • @raviel498
    @raviel498 7 років тому

    Very strong 👍

  • @Karp_Dominion
    @Karp_Dominion 7 років тому +4

    Actually have had better results running this deck with mistress of mixtures or firefly than emerald hive queen.

    • @ryanfowler2669
      @ryanfowler2669 7 років тому +1

      you'd also have better results scrapping every card and playing a jade druid list. the point of his decks is to use cards that don't see play

    • @Zwijger
      @Zwijger 7 років тому

      ryan fowler It already uses cards that don't see play when you just use prince 3 alone. Just swapping out the emerald hive queen is actually a significant improvement for a deck that would then still be very different from other decks.

  • @xdeception8611
    @xdeception8611 7 років тому

    This video is Bello!

  • @Toxicflu
    @Toxicflu 7 років тому +1

    Why prince taldaram over faceless manipulator? you get a lot of stats for that extra 2 mana in most situations.

    • @teorox256
      @teorox256 7 років тому +1

      Ian Bartczak Because Taldaram is a legendary

    • @teorox256
      @teorox256 7 років тому +1

      Ian Bartczak Because Taldaram is a legendary

    • @joef7884
      @joef7884 7 років тому +1

      1. Taldaram is cheaper cost
      2. Doesn't care so much about body since N'Zoth will summon back the full-stat version
      3. Taldaram isn't played at all. Gotta play the off meta cards!

    • @ChumpHS
      @ChumpHS  7 років тому +3

      Two mana is a lot. Faceless is good, too.

  • @lingonberry2524
    @lingonberry2524 7 років тому

    It would be better with some draw mechanics, !

  • @jenskiks2
    @jenskiks2 7 років тому

    if you cut the jades, i would approve of this deck. it's still a cool deck tho. keep it up :)

    • @etherealg3940
      @etherealg3940 7 років тому +1

      Pfft. Shaman Jades are honorable Jades, because they don't go infinite.

    • @sakarasomapa
      @sakarasomapa 7 років тому

      EtherealG what about rouge jade's they can go infinite in wild lol.

    • @etherealg3940
      @etherealg3940 7 років тому

      +Lucerna Sempiternus Yeah, they *can* go infinite, but unlike Jade Druids they have to actually work for it, so I'd say they're fine too.

  • @Toxicflu
    @Toxicflu 7 років тому

    why dont you post your losses? It's obvious the deck isn't climbing. It would help us learn the weaknesses of the deck and together we could find ways of improving the deck.